Annual Report 2007

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2007 Danish National Research Foundation: Center for Subjectivity Research University of Copenhagen Njalsgade 140-142 DK-2300 Copenhagen S Denmark Phone: (+45) 3532 86 80 Fax: (+45) 3532 8681 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cfs.ku.dk Annual report: January 1 - December 31, 2007 Content 1. Introduction 2. Staff 3. External funding for 2007 4. Research 5. Foreign visitors 6. Activities organized by the Center 7. Teaching, supervision, evaluation 8. Various academic and administrative tasks 9. Editorial tasks 10. Collaboration (national and international) 11. Talks and lectures 12. Publications 13. Submitted/accepted manuscripts 1. Introduction The Center is an interdisciplinary "Center of Excellence" funded by the Danish National Research Foundation, with supplementary funding from the University of Copenhagen (Faculty of Humanities, Faculty of Theology and Faculty of Health Sciences). The current research program of the center, which runs from March 1, 2007 – February 28, 2012, is entitled "The Self: An Integrative Approach". The Center’s research is divided into six sections: • Self and consciousness • Core self and extended self: A viable distinction? • Infantile self-experience: A developmental perspective • Self, emotions and understanding • Disorders of self • Self and normativity Although the Center’s research is mainly focused on conceptual and theoretical issues, it is not a narrowly conceived philosophical investigation, but one that is enriched and informed by empirical research, and which involves active collaboration with psychologists, psychiatrists and neuroscientists. 1 During 2007 the Center organized, co-organized, and/or co-sponsored 7 conferences and workshops (with more than 140 speakers) as well as 10 individual guest lectures by invited speakers, and it had more than 45 foreign visitors. The staff of the Center published 56 books and articles, submitted 49 manuscripts for publication, and presented more than 89 papers and lectures in Denmark, Estonia, Sweden, Finland, Germany, UK, France, Italy, Belgium, Spain, Switzerland, Norway, Israel, Canada and USA. The Center’s interdisciplinary meetings have attracted foreign PhD students from Sweden, Norway, Finland, Spain, the Netherlands, Belgium, UK, Turkey, Hungary, Latvia, Italy, Japan and USA. Among the conferences and workshops organized by the Center in 2007, the following two might be singled out as having attracted particular attention in terms of international attendance: Feb. 8-10: Despite Oneself. Subjectivity and its Secret in Kierkegaard and Levinas. April 20-22: Self and Other. 5th Annual Meeting of the Nordic Society for Phenomenology. Among the Center’s many 2007 publications one might highlight the following: • Legrand, D. (ed.): Subjectivity and the body. Special issue of Consciousness and Cognition, 16/3, 2007, 577-768. • Overgaard, S.: Wittgenstein and Other Minds: Rethinking Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity with Wittgenstein, Levinas, and Husserl. New York and London: Routledge, 2007. (xiii+201 pp.) • Grøn, A., Damgaard, I., Overgaard, S. (eds.): Subjectivity and transcendence. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2007. (255 p.) • Gallagher, S., Zahavi, D.: The Phenomenological Mind: An introduction to philosophy of mind and cognitive science. London - New York: Routledge, 2008. (256 pp.) • Jansson, L.B., Parnas, J.: "Competing definitions of schizophrenia: what can be learned from polydiagnostic studies?" Schizophrenia Bulletin 33/5, 2007, 1178-1200. Other highlights include: In his capacity as member of the steering committee of the Research Priority Area “Body and Mind” at the University of Copenhagen, Dan Zahavi was the original promoter and proposer of the new education Cognition and Communication, which subsequently received official approval by the Danish Akkrediteringsrådet. Dan Zahavi joined Shaun Gallagher as co-editor-in-chief of the journal Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (publisher by Springer). Arne Grøn obtained 1.997.590 DKK in funding from the VELUX FONDEN to a project entitled "Trust, Conflict, Recognition". 2. Staff Scientific board • Professor, dr.phil., PhD, Dan Zahavi, Director • Professor, dr.theol., Arne Grøn • Professor, dr.med., Josef Parnas 2 Post.docs • Post.doc. PhD, Thor Grünbaum • Post.doc. PhD, Joel Krueger (since 1.7.2007) • Post.doc. PhD, Dorothée Legrand (since 1.9.2007) • Post.doc. PhD, Claudia Welz (since 1.4.2007) PhD students (all are enrolled at the University of Copenhagen) • Cand.mag., Rasmus Thybo Jensen. The position is financed by the Danish Research Council for the Humanities. • Cand.teol., René Korsholm Rosfort. The position is financed by the Research Priority Area “Body and Mind”, University of Copenhagen. • Mag.art. Johan Eckart Hansen (since 1.3.2007) • Cand.mag. Line Ryberg Ingerslev (since 1.3.2007) • Cand.mag. Christian Beenfeldt (since 1.9.2007) Research assistants • Cand.scient.soc., Gry Ardal Christensen (since 19.2.2007). Technical Staff • Ditte Sæbye, statistician Administrative personnel • Pia Kirkemann, administrator • Mads Henriksen, student helper (until 15.5.2007) • Simon Rodovský, student helper (from 15.5.2007) Visiting professors • Tim Crane, University College London and Institute of Philosophy, University of London, UK (10.4-30.4.2007) • Katalin Farkas, Dept. of Philosophy, Central European University, Budapest, Hungary (10.4-30.4.2007) • Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland (26.3- 26.5.2007) • Werner Jeanrond, Centre for Theology and Religious Studies, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (11.09-31.12.2007) Visiting researchers • Thomas Brudholm, Post.doc, MA (Philosophy & Danish) & Ph.D. (Philosophy) Researcher, Dept. of Holocaust and Genocide Studies, DIIS, Copenhagen, Denmark (1.1.- 1.6.2007) • Wolfgang Fasching, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Austria (1.3.-25.5.2007) • Paul Heefer, Post.doc, Husserl-Archives, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium (01.09.07 - 31.12.07) • Borut Skodlar, MA & MD, Dept. of Psychiatry, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia (26.3-27.4. and 6-24.11.2007) Visiting PhD students • Takaya Suto, Hititsubashi University, Graduate School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences (1.8-19.9.2007) • Morten Sørensen Thaning, cand.phil., University of Aarhus, Denmark (since 1.1.2007) • Somogy Varga, Dept. of Arts and Cultural Studies, University of Copenhagen, Denmark (since 1.9.2007) 3 3. External funding for 2007 The list does not include any external funding already mentioned in the original contract, i.e., it does not include the salary, running expenses, etc. of Dan Zahavi, Arne Grøn and Josef Parnas. In some cases the funding has not been administered directly by the Center, and some of the figures are therefore approximate. Danish Employment Service, job training Gry Ardal Christensen (salary 1.2.07 – 31.12.07) = 128.090 DKK Research Priority Area “Body and Mind”, University of Copenhagen René Korsholm Rosfort (salary and running expenses (1.1-31.12.07) = 364.723 DKK Danish Research Council for the Humanities Morten Sørensen Thaning (salary and running expenses 1.1-31.12. 07) = 285.000 DKK Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen Paul Heeffer (salary 4 months from 01.09.07-31.12.07) = 48.712 DKK Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, France Dorothée Legrand (salary 1 month from 31.3-1.4.07) = 12.672 DKK The French Embassy in Denmark Dorothée Legrand (running expenses) = 18.518 DKK University Hospital of Ljubljana and Medical School of Ljubljana Borut Skodlar (salary 26.3-27.4. and 6-24.11.2007) = 24.000 DKK European Science Foundation Funding the First BASIC Workshop “Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity and Self-representation", ESF-Eurocores programme, CNCC Copenhagen, May 9-12, 2007 = 133.486 DKK Danish Research Agency Thor Grünbaum (salary and running expenses 1.8-31.12.07) = 245.472 DKK Rasmus Thybo Jensen (salary 1.1-31.12.2007) = 290.754 DKK European Commission: Marie Curie Research Training Networks (RTN) Post.Doc. Dorothée Legrand (salary and running expenses 1.9.-31.12.2007) = 186.500 DKK Network activities = 12.000 DKK Austrian Science Fund Wolfgang Fasching (salary 1.3-25.5.2007) = 73.215 DKK Hititsubashi University, Graduate School of Social Sciences Takaya Suto (salary 1.8-19.9.2007) = 15.000 DKK University of Iceland Sigríður Þorgeirsdóttir (salary 26.3-26.5.2007) = 67.000 DKK Carlsberg Foundation Thor Grünbaum (salary 1.1.-31.07.07) = 136.490 DKK External funding in total = 2.041.632 DKK 4 Arne Grøn has obtained funding from the VELUX FONDEN to a research project entitled “Trust, Conflict, Recognition”. The core research group will be Arne Grøn, Anne Marie Pahuus (post.doc.), Claudia Welz (post.doc.) and Gry Ardal Christensen (Ph.D.-student). The project will run from 2008-2011. The precise amount will figure in the center’s annual reports for 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. 4. Research Arne Grøn has worked primarily on the following projects: 1. Within the overall project of a hermeneutical philosophy of religion, studies have focused on a) religion and interpretation, and the question of transcendence, b) religion and (in)humanity, c) phenomenology of religious life and hermeneutics of facticity in Heidegger. 2. Within the overall project of a hermeneutical theory of subjectivity, studies have focused on: a) subjectivity, interiority, and exteriority, particularly in Kierkegaard and Levinas, b) dialectics of recognition, singularity and alterity, c) consciousness, experience and history, particularly in discussing Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, d) freedom and
Recommended publications
  • Contributors
    Contributors Jean-Noël ALETTI, Pontifical Biblical Institute, Wolfgang BEINERT, University of Ratisbonne: Rome: Mystery; Pauline Theology Council; Government, Church; Hierarchy; Struc- Ysabel de ANDIA, CNRS, Paris: Attributes, Divine; tures, Ecclesial; Synod Dionysius the Pseudo-Aeropagite; Negative Theol- Olivier de BERRANGER, Bishop of Saint-Denis: ogy; Simplicity, Divine Lubac, Henri Sonier de Jean-Robert ARMOGATHE, École pratique des Nigel BIGGAR, Oriel College, Oxford: Casuistry; Hautes Études, Paris: Bellarmine, Robert; Leibniz, Obligation Gottfried Wilhem; Quietism André BIRMELÉ, Université de Strasbourg: Eccle- David ATTWOOD, Trinity College, Bristol: Legiti- siology; Ecumenism; Family, Confessional; Protes- mate Defense; War tantism; Unity of the Church; World Council of Gennaro AULETTA, Doctor of Philosophy, Rome: Churches; Works Providence Yves-Marie BLANCHARD, Institut catholique de Joseph AUNEAU, École supérieure de théologie Paris: Johannine Theology; Lamb of God/Paschal catholique, Issy-les-Moulineaux: Blessing; Holi- Lamb; Word ness; Temple Neal BLOUGH, Centre mennonite d’études et de Peter BAELZ, Oxford University: Ethics rencontre, Saint-Maurice: Anabaptists Michael BANNER, University of London: Ethics, François BOESPFLUG, Université de Strasbourg: Sexual; Relativism Images; Nicaea I, Council of Edmond BARBOTIN, Université de Strasbourg: Ex- Hubert BOST, Institut protestant de théologie, Mont- perience pellier: History of the Church; Tradition Richard BAUCKAM, University of St. Andrews: Jacques-Guy BOUGEROL, 1909–1997:
    [Show full text]
  • Being Someone
    PSYCHE: http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/ Being Someone Dan Zahavi Danish National Research Foundation: Center for Subjectivity Research University of Copenhagen Denmark © Dan Zahavi [email protected] PSYCHE 11 (5), June 2005 KEYWORDS: Self, Phenomenology, Self-experience, Metzinger COMMENTARY ON: Metzinger, T. (2003) Being No One. The Self-Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press xii + 699pp. ISBN: 0-262-13417-9. ABSTRACT: My discussion will focus on what is arguable the main claim of Being No One: That no such things as selves exist in the world and that nobody ever was or had a self. In discussing to what extent Metzinger can be said to argue convincingly for this claim, I will also comment on his methodological use of pathology and briefly make some remarks vis-à-vis his understanding and criticism of phenomenology. D. Zahavi: Being Someone 1 PSYCHE: http://psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/ Being No One is a book that engages with some truly interesting questions. It is also a very long book, and it will be impossible to deal with all its suggestions and to discuss all the problems it raises in a short commentary. What I intend to do in the following is to focus on three areas. My emphasis will be on Metzinger’s main claim: no such things as selves exist in the world and nobody ever was or had a self. In discussing to what extent Metzinger can be said to argue convincingly for this claim in Being No One, I will also comment on his methodological use of pathology and briefly make some remarks vis-à- vis his understanding and criticism of phenomenology.
    [Show full text]
  • SBH NL 2018 Aug V25.Pages
    St Benet’s NewsAugust 2018 INSIDE THIS ISSUE Welcome to the latest issue of the St Benet’s newsletter. For this edition, we have followed the example of many of the other colleges in producing an annual, rather than a termly edition. We are therefore featuring a pictorial “Year in the Life of Benet’s”, giving a flavour of what has been happening here over the past academic year. Undoubtedly, the main event was the 120th Anniversary Gaudy, held in the House of Commons on Friday 3rd November 2017, hosted by alum, Damian Green MP. 176 Benetians and friends came together on that evening to celebrate the Hall’s history. It was particularly pleasing to have three Benet’s Masters together for the event. The present Master, Prof Werner G Jeanrond was joined by Fr Henry Wansbrough OSB (1990-2004) and Fr Felix Stephens OSB (2007-2012). As many of you will have heard, Prof Werner Jeanrond, will end his six-year term as Master of Benet’s at the end of August 2018 and will take up the Chair of Dogmatics at the University of Oslo. Under his leadership, Benet’s has successfully gone fully co-educational, has acquired a much-needed second building, has expanded its graduate numbers considerably, and is extremely well-regarded across the University — the Vice-Chancellor, Prof Louise Richardson has publicly stated: “Oxford needs St Benet’s”. Recruitment for Werner’s replacement will start in the autumn and news of the Interim Master will be announced shortly. I will also be leaving my role as Alumni Officer & PA to the Master at the end of August.
    [Show full text]
  • Haquin Spegel Och De Grekiska Kyrkofäderna
    Svensk Teologisk Kvartalskrift. Årg. 78 (2002) Den svenska lutherrenässansen KJELL OVE NILSSON Kjell Ove Nilsson är docent i etik vid Lunds universitet och f.d. domprost i Göteborg. I denna artikel diskuterar han utvecklingen i den svenska lutheiforskningen under 1900-talet och sammanhanget med den tyska lutherforskningen. Han belyser även den nya finska luther- tolkningen. antytts många nya grepp och utgångspunkter. Inledning Luther framstår också inte sällan som den som När man vill beskriva den svenska s.k. luther­ «bäst» ger svar på aktuella teologiska frågor — renässansen får man ta till ett mer än 100-årigt f.ö. ett metodiskt problem som vi återkommer perspektiv. Givetvis fanns det också tidigare ett till. starkt intresse av Luther och hans teologi — i Å andra sidan finns samtidigt och jämsides ett olika tappning. Sverige var ju det kanske mest stort ekumeniskt intresse och engagemang i solida och enhetligt homogena lutherska landet Sverige, från början starkt personifierat i Nathan under flera århundraden. Och Luther stod högt i Söderbloms gestalt, också som lutherforskare. kurs, fast med ganska olika tolkningsmodeller. Det är alltså en lutherforskare som står byst i Kyr­ Begreppet «renässans» tyder ju i och för sig på kornas världsråds stora hall i Genève! Det finns att det finns något förut som man förnyar och går under hela 1900-talet en klart allmänkyrklig vidare med.1 «katolsk» trend i svensk kristenhet, och luther- När man talar om en lutherrenässans innebär forskningen får ofta tjäna som redskap också i det inte bara att det finns ett stort intresse av den utvecklingen. Luthers ekumeniska betydelse Luthers teologi i största allmänhet.
    [Show full text]
  • Protosociology Volume 36/2019: Senses of Self … 4 Contents
    ProtoSociology — www.protosociology.de — An International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research ProtoSociology is an interdisciplinary journal which crosses the borders of philosophy, social sciences, and their corresponding disciplines for more than two decades. Each issue concentrates on a specific topic taken from the current discussion to which scientists from different fields contri- bute the results of their research. ProtoSociology is further a project that examines the nature of mind, Senses of Self language and social systems. In this context theoretical work has been | Approaches to Pre-Reflective done by investigating such theoretical concepts like interpretation and Self-Awareness (social) action, globalization, the global world-system, social evolution, and the sociology of membership. Our purpose is to initiate and enforce Edited by Marc Borner, Manfred Frank, and Kenneth Williford basic research on relevant topics from different perspectives and tradi- tions. Editor: Gerhard Preyer Senses of Self Vol. 36: Vol. ProtoSociology } Vol. 35: Joint Commitments Vol. 34: Meaning and Publicity Vol. 33: The Borders of Global Theory – Reflections from Within and Without Vol. 32: Making and Unmaking Modern Japan Volume 36, 2019 © 2019 Gerhard Preyer Frankfurt am Main http://www.protosociology.de [email protected] Erste Auflage / first published 2019 ISSN 1611–1281 Bibliografische Information Der Deutschen Bibliothek Die Deutsche Bibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Natio nal bibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.ddb.de abrufbar. Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Das Werk einschließlich aller seiner Teile ist urheberrechtlich geschützt. Je de Ver wertung außerhalb der engen Grenzen des Urheberrechtsgesetzes ist ohne Zu stimmung der Zeitschirft und seines Herausgebers unzulässig und strafbar.
    [Show full text]
  • Dogma and History in Victorian Scotland
    Dogma and History in Victorian Scotland Todd Regan Statham Faculty of Religious Studies McGill University Montreal, Quebec February 2011 A Thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Todd Regan Statham Table of Contents Abstract v Résumé vii Acknowledgments ix Abbreviations x Introduction 1 Chapter 1: The Scottish Presbyterian Church ‘in’ History 18 1.1. Introduction 18 1.2. Church, Scripture, and Tradition 19 1.2.1. Scripture and Tradition in Roman Catholicism 20 1.2.2. Scripture and Tradition in Protestantism 22 1.2.3. A Development of Dogma? 24 1.3. Church, Doctrine, and History 27 1.3.1. Historical Criticism of Doctrine in the Reformation 29 1.3.2. Historical Criticism of Doctrine in the Enlightenment 32 1.3.3. Historical Criticism of Doctrine in Romanticism and Idealism 35 1.4. Church: Scottish and Reformed 42 1.4.1. The Scottish Church and the Continent 42 1.4.2. Westminster Calvinism 44 1.4.3. The Evangelical Revival 48 1.4.4. Enlightened Legacies 53 1.4.5. Romantic Legacies 56 1.4.6. The Free Church and the United Presbyterians in Victorian Scotland 61 1.5. Conclusion 65 Chapter 2: William Cunningham, John Henry Newman, and the Development of Doctrine 67 2.1. Introduction 67 2.2. William Cunningham 69 2.3. An Essay on the Development of Doctrine 72 2.3.1. Against “Bible Religion” and the Church Invisible 74 2.3.2. Cunningham on Scripture and Church 78 2.3.3. The Theory of Development 82 ii 2.3.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Empathy≠Sharing: Perspectives From
    Consciousness and Cognition 36 (2015) 543–553 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Consciousness and Cognition journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/concog Empathy – sharing: Perspectives from phenomenology and developmental psychology ⇑ Dan Zahavi a, , Philippe Rochat b a Center for Subjectivity Research, Department of Media, Cognition and Communication, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 140-142, Copenhagen S, Denmark b Department of Psychology, Emory University, 463 Psychology Building, 36 Eagle Row, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA article info abstract Article history: We argue that important insights regarding the topic of sharing can be gathered from Received 30 December 2014 phenomenology and developmental psychology; insights that in part challenge wide- Revised 12 May 2015 spread ideas about what sharing is and where it can be found. To be more specific, we first Accepted 13 May 2015 exemplify how the notion of sharing is being employed in recent discussions of empathy, Available online 10 June 2015 and then argue that this use of the notion tends to be seriously confused. It typically con- flates similarity and sharing and, more generally speaking, fails to recognize that sharing Keywords:: proper involves reciprocity. As part of this critical analysis, we draw on sophisticated anal- Empathy yses of the distinction between empathy and emotional sharing that can be found in early Affective sharing Phenomenology phenomenology. Next, we turn to developmental psychology. Sharing is not simply one Developmental psychology thing, but a complex and many-layered phenomenon. By tracing its early developmental trajectory from infancy and beyond, we show how careful psychological observations can help us develop a more sophisticated understanding of sharing than the one currently employed in many discussions in the realm of neuroscience.
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with Dan Zahavi 47
    108 Philosophical Interviews 114 Philosophical Interviews Husserl, self and others: an interview with Dan Zahavi 47 Picture source: Dan Zahavi's archives. How did you originally get interested in philosophy? I met philosophy early. I read much as a child, and occasionally came across refer- ences to philosophy. I didn’t understand what it meant, but I was curious, and when I was 12 years old, I asked my mother to buy me a copy of Will Durant’s The Story of Philosophy: the Lives and Opinions of the Greater Philosophers. I can’t claim to have understood much at that age, but Durant’s account of Plato was still so in- spiring that I there and then decided that I wanted to study philosophy. And that was basically a decision I stuck to, and which I have never regretted. It made me opt for modern languages in the gymnasium, since I wanted to learn German so that I could read Kant and study in Germany. Right after the gymnasium, I enrolled as a philosophy student at the University of Copenhagen. Initially I was mostly in- terested in the history of philosophy (Aristotle, Thomas Aquinas and Kant), but 47 An earlier version of the present interview appeared in Danish in F.K. Thomsen & J.v.H. Holtermann, eds. 2010. Filosofi: 5 spørgsmål . Automatic Press. AVANT Volume III, Number 1/2012 www.avant.edu.pl/en 115 eventually I got interested in Husserl, which I back then took to be an interesting synthesis of Aristotle and Kant. So I decided to write my MA thesis on him, and it was on this occasion that I finally realized my plans about studying abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Reviews
    Book Reviews Hinduism and Modernity. By David Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003. Pp. 250. £50 / $62.95; paperback £15.99 / $26.95. Hinduism and Modernity by David Smith Christian figures (such as Brahmabandhav when it rolls back into the temple of its seeks to explore how the seemingly Upadhyay), as well as a whole array of origin, Smith’s book slowly rolls to a stop, disparate forces of Hinduism and Western missionaries who played such a leaving the reader wondering how much modernity have interacted with one vital role in stimulating the Bengali progress has actually been made. another. Smith demonstrates his Renaissance, are all curiously neglected. Reminiscent of the famous race around pedagogical abilities through an insightful The role of the printing press and the emer- the universe between Ganesh and Skanda array of metaphors borrowed from gence of vernacular, prose writings by for the mango prize, wherein Skanda popular Hinduism that he uses to illustrate Hindu reformers in mediating modernism actually makes the journey and the various themes within Hinduism and and Hinduism are likewise omitted. elephant-headed Ganesh merely plods modernity. This approach serves him In part 3 the author chooses three around his parents and declares them the particularly well in part 1 of the book themes for comparison: gender issues in universe, the reader may wonder whether when he is defining Hinduism and modernity and Hinduism, idolatry in East we, like Skanda of old, really made the modernity and tracing the broad, historical and West, and the notion of the self in the journey and received the prize or, like themes in each movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Penultimate Draft. Final Version Published in T. Toadvine & L. Embree (Eds.): Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. Kluwer
    Penultimate draft. Final version published in T. Toadvine & L. Embree (eds.): Merleau-Ponty's Reading of Husserl. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002, 3-29. Please quote only from published version. Dan Zahavi University of Copenhagen MERLEAU-PONTY ON HUSSERL. A REAPPRAISAL If one comes to Phénoménologie de la perception after having read Sein und Zeit (or Prolegomena zur Geschichte des Zeitbegriffs) one will be in for a surprise. Both works contain a number of both implicit and explicit references to Husserl, but the presentation they give is so utterly different, that one might occasionally wonder whether they are referring to the same author. Thus nobody can overlook that Merleau-Ponty’s interpretation of Husserl differs significantly from Heidegger’s. It is far more charitable. In fact, when evaluating the merits of respectively Husserl and Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty often goes very much against the standard view. This is not only the case in his notorious remark on the very first page of Phénoménologie de la Perception where he declares that the whole of Sein und Zeit is nothing but an explication of Husserl’s notion of Lifeworld, but also - to give just one further example - in one of his Sorbonne-lectures, where Merleau-Ponty writes that Husserl took the issue of historicity far more seriously than Heidegger.1 1. Husserl and the Merleau-Pontyeans My point of departure will be the slightly surprising fact that a large number of Merleau-Ponty scholars have questioned the validity of Merleau-Ponty’s reading of Husserl. Let me illustrate this with a few references.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism and Phenomenology”
    Information about the Conference: http://eng.iph.ras.ru/7_8_11_2016.htm RAS Institute of Philosophy Tibetan Culture and Information Center in Moscow First International Conference “Buddhism and Phenomenology” November 7–8, 2016 RAS Institute of Philosophy, Moscow Supported by: Save Tibet Foundation Dan Zahavi Center for Subjectivity Research, University of Copenhagen, Denmark Transcendental phenomenology, intentionality and subjectivity Director of the Center for Subjectivity research, Professor of Philosophy at University of Copenhagen, phenomenologist interested especially in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and philosophy of mind. In his writings, he has dealt extensively with topics such as self, self-consciousness, intersubjectivity and social cognition. He is a co-editor of the journal Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. Zahavi's work has been translated into 25 languages. The author and co-author of 10 books. 1 Transcendental phenomenology, intentionality and subjectivity Dan Zahavi Center for Subjectivity Research University of Copenhagen 2 The reign of phenomenology • Phenomenology counts as one of the most influential philosophical movements in 20th century philosophy. • But the question of how to define phenomenology remains contested even today, almost 120 years after the publication of Husserl’s Logical Investigations (1900-01) • A central ambition in Logical Investigations was to explore the intentionality of consciousness • Must phenomenology be appreciated as a continuation of Brentano’s project of descriptive psychology? 3 Plain phenomenology and introspectionism • One is doing plain phenomenology, if (1) one makes and explains mental or psychological distinctions, (2) shows why those distinctions are theoretically important, (3) relies on a source of first-person warrant, and (4) does not assume that first-person warrant derives from some source of third-person warrant (Siewert 2007: 202).
    [Show full text]
  • The Concept of Personhood in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations (2009 -) Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Projects The onceptC of Personhood in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl Colin J. Hahn Marquette University Recommended Citation Hahn, Colin J., "The oncC ept of Personhood in the Phenomenology of Edmund Husserl" (2012). Dissertations (2009 -). Paper 193. http://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/193 THE CONCEPT OF PERSONHOOD IN THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF EDMUND HUSSERL by Colin J. Hahn, B.A., M.A. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2012 ABSTRACT THE CONCEPT OF PERSONHOOD IN THE PHENOMENOLOGY OF EDMUND HUSSERL Colin J. Hahn, B.A., M.A. Marquette University, 2012 This dissertation attempts to articulate the concept of personhood in Husserl. In his research manuscripts, Husserl recognized the need for a concrete description of subjectivity that still remained within the transcendental register. The concept of personhood, although never fully worked out, is intended to provide this description by demonstrating how the embodied, enworlded, intersubjective, and axiological dimensions of experience are integrated. After briefly outlining the characteristics of a transcendental phenomenological account of personhood, this dissertation outlines the essential structures of personhood. The person, for Husserl, includes the passive dimension with the instinctive and affective dimensions
    [Show full text]