DOCSLIB.ORG

Birmingham to Exeter Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Birmingham to Exeter Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1 Birmingham to Exeter Route Strategy March 2017 Contents 1. Introduction 1 Purpose of Route Strategies 2 Strategic themes 2 Stakeholder engagement 3 Transport Focus 3 2. The route 5 Route Strategy overview map 7 3. Current constraints and challenges 9 A safe and serviceable network 9 More free-flowing network 9 Supporting economic growth 10 An improved environment 10 A more accessible and integrated network 10 Diversionary routes 14 Maintaining the strategic road network 15 4. Current investment plans and growth potential 17 Economic context 17 Innovation 17 Investment plans 17 5. Future challenges and opportunities 21 6. Next steps 27 i R Lon ou don to Scotla te nd East London Or bital and M23 to Gatwick str Lon ategies don to Scotland West London to Wales The division of rou tes for the F progra elixstowe to Midlands mme of route strategies on t he Solent to Midlands Strategic Road Network M25 to Solent (A3 and M3) Kent Corridor to M25 (M2 and M20) South Coast Central Birmingham to Exeter A1 South West Peninsula London to Leeds (East) East of England South Pennines A19 A69 North Pen Newccaastlstlee upon Tyne nines Carlisle A1 Sunderland Midlands to Wales and Gloucest M6 ershire North and East Midlands A66 A1(M) A595 South Midlands Middlesbrougugh A66 A174 A590 A19 A1 A64 A585 M6 York Irish S Lee ea M55 ds M65 M1 Preston M606 M621 A56 M62 A63 Kingston upon Hull M62 M61 M58 A1 M1 Liver Manchest A628 A180 North Sea pool er M18 M180 Grimsby M57 A616 A1(M) M53 M62 M60 Sheffield A556 M56 M6 A46 A55 A1 Lincoln A500 Stoke-on-Trent A38 M1 Nottingham A52 Derby A50 A483 A5 A453 A38 A42 A46 A458 M54 Norwich A5 M42 A47 M6 M6 Toll Leicester A47 M69 A1 Birmingham M6 Peterborough A12 A5 M5 M42 A1(M) Coventry A14 A11 A49 M45 M1 A45 A14 Worcesester A14 A46 A5 A428 A421 Cambridge M40 A11 M50 A1 Ipswich A43 Milton A12 A14 A40 Keynes M1 A120 A40 Glou A417 A5 A1(M) cester A120 Oxford M11 M5 A34 M25 M48 M40 A419 A12 M4 Swindon M4 A404 M4 SoSouuthethendnd--onon-S-Seea Br A13 istol M32 Reading London M4 M2 A249 A34 M5 A36 A303 M26 M3 M25 A2 M20 A3 Crawley M23 A36 A303 A21 A20 Folk A23 estoonne Yeovil A31 A259 M27 A3(M) Exeter A27 A30 A30 A27 Bright A259 A35 Portsmouth on Torquay A30 Plymouth A38 Engliglishsh Chhanannel 0 k ilometres 60 0 mi les 40 Highways Agency media se © C rvices MCR N1302 rown copyright and dat 06 abase rights 2015 Ordna nce Survey 100030649 ii z 1iii z Highways England 1. Introduction The modernisation of England’s motorways and major A roads, also known as the strategic road network (SRN), is making a vital contribution to economic wellbeing and growth. This Route Strategy – one of 18 such reports – provides a statement on the current performance of, and perceived pressures on, the Birmingham to Exeter route to inform the planning of future investment. The SRN supports national and local economic prosperity by: ▪ linking together major cities ▪ connecting with extensive local road networks ▪ providing links to major ports, airports, and rail terminals ▪ enabling good access to regions and cross-border routes between the nations of the United Kingdom The establishment of Highways England through the Infrastructure Act 2015 has changed fundamentally the way we plan investment in the network. Funding is now determined every 5 years, in the Road Investment Strategy (RIS), which is set by Government. We are currently delivering on the commitments that were set out in the first RIS covering 2015 to 2020, which are already making a difference for road users across the network. At the same time, we are working closely with the other 3 bodies with statutory responsibility for the RIS – Department for Transport, Office of Rail and Road and Transport Focus – on preparing for the next RIS (RIS2) for the period after 2020. 1 2 London to Scotland West Road Strategy RIS1 Strategic Vision as reiterated in RIS Post 22: Planning ahe ad Purpose of Route Strategies RIS1 Strategic Vision as reiterated in RIS Route Strategies provide a high level view of the current Post 22: Planning ahe ad performance of the SRN as well as issues perceived by E conomy Environment our stakeholders that affect the network. They are one of the key components of research required for developing E conomy Environment the RIS. This suite of Route Strategies builds upon the Network Integration analysis underpinning the first set of Route Strategies capability undertaken between 2013 to 2015, which together Network capability Integration provided the first comprehensive assessment of the entire Safety network. This time the Route Strategies aim to: bring together information from key partners, Safety ▪ motorists, local communities, construction partners, Figure 1.1 - RIS1 strategic vision environmental groups and across the business Highways England Strategic Business ▪ achieve a better understanding of the condition Plans key outcomes and performance of our roads, and local and Highways England Strategic Business regional aspirations Plans keyS outcomesupporting economic growth through a modernised and reliable network that reduces delays, cr eates jobs ▪ shape our investment priorities to improve the service and helps business compete and opens up new areas Suppforo dretingvelo epcmeo nnot m ic growth through a modernised for road users and support a growing economy and reliable network that reduces delays, cr eates jobs and helps business compete and opens up new areas help inform the next RIS1 More free-flowing network where routine delays ▪ for developme nt are more infrequent, and where journeys are safe r and more reliable More free-flowing network where routine delays Strategic themes are more infrequent, and where journeys are safe r andS mafeor ea ndrelia sbelerv iceable network where no one The Government’s vision for transforming the SRN is should be harmed when travelling or work ing on the network described in the Road Investment Strategy post 2020: Safe and serviceable network where no one Planning Ahead document available on www.gov.uk. This should be harmed when travelling or work ing on vision builds on the 5 broad aims published in the Road the Inmeprtworkoved environm ent where the impact of our activities is further reduced, ensuring a long-term and Investment Strategy for 2015-2020: economy; network sustainable benefit to the environment Improved environm ent where the impact of our capability; integration; safety; and the environment. It also activities is further reduced, ensuring a long-term and builds on Highways England’s 5 strategic outcomes (see susMtaoinraeb alecc beensse fitib tloe tahnde e innvtiroegnrmeatendt network that gives peop le the freedom to choose their mode of Figures 1.1 and 1.2). Using the evidence from this and the transport and enable safe movement acro ss and other 17 Route Strategies, we will develop proposals that Moalore nagccsideess thibel en eatndwor ikn t egrated network that gives peop le the freedom to choose their mode of can help bring the Government’s vision for roads to life. transport and enable safe movement acro ss and alongside the network Figure 1.2 - Highways England strategic outcomes 1See Chapter 6 for more information on the next RIS 2 Highways England Transport Focus We commissioned Transport Focus, the road user Stakeholder engagement watchdog, to undertake research on road user priorities. More than 4,400 interviews were undertaken with drivers Building on the engagement we started in the first across the SRN. Figure 1.4 below shows the breakdown round of Route Strategies, we have continued to work by user type and purpose. closely with a wide range of stakeholders to enhance our Completed interviews understanding of the strategic road network, and identify where users and other stakeholders feel investment 3,487Completed interviews79% is needed. We used a number of methods to collate information. 3,487322 79%7% For example, we launched an online tool for customers and stakeholders over the summer of 2016 to inform us 322 7% of the issues and challenges on our roads that affected 407 9% them. As well as information collated from a range of people within Highways England, more than 300 different 407 9% stakeholder organisations provided important feedback 206 5% on the network during the evidence collection period. There were also more than 370 individual members of the 206 5% Commuting 501 11% public who contributed information. In total, around 2,700 individual points were raised by external stakeholders. Commuting 501 11% Business 1,367 31% Business Leisure 1,367 31% 233 354 2,457 56% Business Figure 1.4 - Driver sample breakdown Leisure25 fleet managers2,457 from 56%a mix Local authority 716 of industries sie and regions STBs/LEPs 25 fleet managers from a mix Individuals of industries sie and regions Others 1,233 166 The research found that the Birmingham to Exeter route was well rated, with 62% of users rating their experience of the route as either extremely good or fairly good. However, as Table 1.1 shows, 43% of users still Figure 1.3 - External stakeholder responses experienced problems using the route, with congestion and roadworks cited as the 2 main causes. We are increasingly working with subnational transport bodies (SNTBs), including Midlands Connect, England’s The full report has been published on Transport Economic Heartland and Transport for the North, so we Focus’s website www.transportfocus.org.uk/research- can ensure that their developing strategies and planning publications/publications/road-to-the-future. are integrated into our thinking (and vice versa). We will continue to work closely with Transport Focus to understand customer priorities to ensure that the next RIS reflects their needs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT for TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview
    Appendix 1 I.01: DEPARTMENT FOR TRANSPORT (DFT) ROAD INVESTMENT STRATEGY (2014) Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 Road Investment Strategy: Overview December 2014 The Department for Transport has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the Department’s website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact the Department. Department for Transport Great Minster House 33 Horseferry Road London SW1P 4DR Telephone 0300 330 3000 Website www.gov.uk/dft General enquiries https://forms.dft.gov.uk ISBN: 978-1-84864-148-8 © Crown copyright 2014 Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with the Crown. You may re-use this information (not including logos or third-party material) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third-party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Photographic acknowledgements Alamy: Cover Contents 3 Contents Foreword 5 The Strategic Road Network 8 The challenges 9 The Strategic Vision 10 The Investment Plan 13 The Performance Specification 22 Transforming our roads 26 Appendices: regional profiles 27 The Road Investment Strategy suite of documents (Strategic Vision, Investment Plan, Performance Specification, and this Overview) are intended to fulfil the requirements of Clause 3 of the Infrastructure Bill 2015 for the 2015/16 – 2019/20 Road Period.
    [Show full text]
  • M5 Oldbury Viaduct Traffic Management Study Executive Summary
    M5 Oldbury Viaduct Traffic Management Study Executive Summary Oldbury and Park Street viaducts carry approximately 3km of the elevated sections of the M5 to the west of Birmingham between junctions 1 and 2. Constructed in 1970, it has deteriorated in recent years and has seen increased emergency interventions (55 in 2016). Therefore we need to repair and upgrade sections now in order to prevent bigger challenges and further disruption in the future. By maintaining this key corridor we’re delivering a huge investment that will support economic growth locally and in the wider West Midlands. Once complete, customers will benefit from a safer, more resilient route and enhanced driver experience. Other planned interventions on the strategic network in coming years include HS2, M6 J10 redesign, and on the local network, proposed Birchley island project and M5 junction 1 redesign. Therefore, we have a window of opportunitybetween April 2017 and autumn 2018 to complete this work at M5 Oldbury Viaduct. This section of the M5 motorway is particularly busy, carrying both local and strategic south-west and south-east to north-west traffic, with seasonal peaks. It is a commuter hub with traffic joining with the M6, other roads into and out of the Birmingham hub, and other cities in the region. Our engineers advised that in order to carry out the work safely, the carriageway would have to be treated in sections under traffic management. Four options were progressed to the modelling stage to understand impact and we chose the one that was safest, offered most value for money and most appropriate timeline.
    [Show full text]
  • Walk Instructions
    EXTRACT FROM THE BOOK ‘FROM BRYCGSTOW TO BRISTOL IN 45 BRIDGES’ COPYRIGHT: JEFF LUCAS / BRISTOL BOOKS 2019 WALK INSTRUCTIONS These instructions are to guide you from bridge to bridge, and they begin and takes you through some delightful and varied scenery. I urge you not where it seems most appropriate to start the walk — at Bristol’s first to miss this out! The section from Avonmouth Bridge to Clifton takes bridge. They are not intended to be a guided tour of the whole city, but you over some rough ground and parts of it it can be very muddy in wet some items of significant interest that you pass along the way are pointed weather. Sensible shoes are a must. out. The walk is circular, so you could choose your own preferred starting Much use is made in these instructions of compass directions, so it (and finishing) point if this would be more convenient. Many people will is a good idea to take a compass/GPS. And just to be clear, “Downstream” be tempted to omit the long Clifton–Avonmouth–Clifton “loop” along = same direction as flow of river, “Upstream” = opposite direction to flow the course of the Avon, but this section of the walk is richly rewarding of river. The walk begins at Castle Green. Before you start, Harbour being drained of water in the event of a take a look at the ruined St Peters Church. Note 7. Cross Valentine’s Bridge, then immediately bomb hitting the lock gates. how (in the absence of other buildings) it gives an turn right and continue along Glass Wharf to excellent all round view of the environs.
    [Show full text]
  • Highways England Annual Report and Accounts 2015-2016
    Highways England Annual Report and Accounts 2015-2016 Highways England Annual Report and Accounts 2015-2016 Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 7 of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 13 July 2016 HC 529 © Crown copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] Print ISBN 9781474134279 Web ISBN 9781474134286 ID 2815682 07/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Contents Our role and how to contact us 6 Section 1 Chairman’s statement 7 Section 2 Chief Executive’s review 9 Strategic report Section 3 Overview A snapshot of our performance against our KPIs 12 Performance headlines 13 Section 4 Making our network safer 14 Section 5 Improving customer service Customer satisfaction 17 A better maintained network 19 A free-flowing network 22 An accessible and
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Facilities on the Strategic Road Network Demonstration Project: Stakeholder Engagement Report by Campaign for Better Transport for Transport Focus
    Bus facilities on the Strategic Road Network demonstration project: stakeholder engagement report by Campaign for Better Transport for Transport Focus March 2019 Bus facilities on the Strategic Road Network demonstration project: stakeholder engagement report by Campaign for Better Transport for Transport Focus March 2019 CONTENTS Executive Summary Full report 1. Introduction 2. Methodology Our approach Stakeholder identification and contact Workshops Online survey Other submissions 3. Stakeholder views Common themes M32 case study A27 case study 4. Conclusions and next steps Lessons learned Key messages Next steps Appendices 1. List of participant groups 2. Examples of awareness raising materials 3. Workshop materials 4. Workshop notes 5. Survey questions and responses 6. Other submissions 1 Bus facilities on the Strategic Road Network demonstration project: stakeholder engagement report: Executive Summary Campaign for Better Transport has been commissioned in partnership with Transport Focus to collect stakeholder views on the priorities and opportunities for improving bus facilities on the Strategic Road Network to inform Highways England. This report records how the engagement with stakeholders was undertaken, and the responses received. Having captured their feedback, the report sets out some of the key issues identified by stakeholders, including challenges to be addressed, and opportunities to deliver improvements. It contains full reports of the stakeholder workshops and responses from the online surveys together with some additional individual submissions. This stakeholder engagement is part of a larger demonstration project commissioned by Highways England looking at two locations, to identify issues affecting bus and coach operation on the strategic road network to inform future investment. Methodology We contacted a wide range of local stakeholders in both case study areas and invited them to participate in a workshop held in January 2019 in the local area.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Spatial Plan Joint Transport Study Final Report October 2017
    WEST OF ENGLAND “BUILDING OUR FUTURE” West of England Joint Spatial Plan Joint Transport Study final report October 2017 NOVEMBER 2017 9 www.jointplanningwofe.org.uk West of England Joint Transport Study Final Report Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for the West of England authorities’ information and use in relation to the West of England Joint Transport Study. Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 120 pages including the cover. Document history Job number: 5137782 Document ref: Final Report Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 First Draft JFC TP, SG RT, TM JFC 05/05/17 Rev 2.0 Second Draft JFC, TP 26/05/17 Rev 3.0 Third Draft JFC BD, SG RT JFC 07/06/17 Rev 4.0 Fourth Draft JFC SG RT JFC 21/06/17 Rev 5.0 5th Draft (Interim Version) JFC 27/06/17 Rev 6.0 Sixth Draft JFC SG RT JFC 28/06/17 Rev 7.0 Final Draft JFC RT RT JFC 07/07/17 Rev 8.0 Revised Final Draft JFC JFC 01/09/17 Rev 9.0 Final JFC SG RT JFC 19/10/17 Client signoff Client West of England authorities Project West of England Joint Transport Study Document title Final Report Job no. 5137782 Copy no. Document 5137782/Final Report reference Atkins West of England Joint Transport Study Final Report | October 2017 West of England Joint Transport Study Final Report Table of contents Chapter Pages 1.
    [Show full text]
  • HIGHWAYS ENGLAND Asset Management Development Group
    HIGHWAYS ENGLAND Asset Management Development Group ASSET DATA MANAGEMENT MANUAL Part 2 – Requirements and Additional Information October 2020 Version: 12.0 Asset Data Management Manual Page 1 of 237 Date of Issue: October 2020 Part 2 - Requirements and Additional Information This page is intentionally left blank. Asset Data Management Manual Page 2 of 237 Date of Issue: October 2020 Part 2 - Requirements and Additional Information Revision Sheet For revisions across all ADMM documents see the Revision Log available on Standards for Highways: http://www.standardsforhighways.co.uk/ha/standards/admm/index.htm Version Date Issued 3.0 April 2016 4.0 September 2016 5.0 March 2017 6.0 September 2017 7.0 March 2018 8.0 October 2018 9.0 April 2019 10.0 October 2019 11.0 April 2020 12.0 October 2020 Asset Data Management Manual Page 3 of 237 Date of Issue: October 2020 Part 2 - Requirements and Additional Information Contents Contents……… ......................................................................................................... 4 Foreword…….. .......................................................................................................... 9 Part 2.1 – GENERIC ASSET DATA REQUIREMENTS .......................................... 12 1 Asset Data Lifecycle Requirements ......................................................... 13 1.1 Capture or Update ....................................................................................... 13 1.2 Store ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • M180/M181 A180/A160 Investing in Our Road Network
    M180/M181 A180/A160 Investing in our road network We’ll be working on the M180 At Highways England we believe in a of Immingham which plays a key role in the long- connected country and our network term growth of the economy and provides essential access to global markets. makes these connections happen. Our improvements include vital repairs to the surface We strive to improve our major roads and motorways on the M180 and A180, bridge maintenance and – engineering the future to keep people today and improvements to junction 5 of the M180. moving better tomorrow. We want to make sure all We’re working closely with North Lincolnshire our major roads are more reliable, durable and, most Council to unlock jobs and homes in the Scunthorpe importantly, safe and that’s why we’re investing more area. The Lincolnshire Lakes development one of the than £5 million improving our network in this area. largest residential developments, not just in Yorkshire We’re carrying out a range of improvements along and the Humber region but in the whole of the UK the M180, M181, A180 and A160 over the next 12 and will create new homes, a business park and months to ensure we make the road safer and office accommodation. provide better journeys for drivers and residents. A new M181 junction will be created to improve By improving safety and creating smoother journeys access routes to the motorway and make the area we’ll create better links for those travelling to the Port more accessible as a place to live, visit and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Assessment of Highways England's
    Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance April 2020 to March 2021 HC454 Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance April 2020 to March 2021 Presented to Parliament pursuant to section 10(8) of the Infrastructure Act 2015 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 15 July 2021 HC454 © Crown copyright 2021 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/official-documents. © Crown copyright 2020 Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at This 25 Cabot Square, London, E14 publication is licensed under 4QZ. the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/ open-government-licence/version/3ISBN 978-1-5286-2760-3 . Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain CCS0621812220 07/21 permission from the copyright holders concerned. Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum This publication is available at orr.gov.uk Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery OfficeAny enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at orr.gov.uk/contact-us Office of Rail and Road | Annual Assessment of Highways England’s Performance: April 2020 to March 2021 Contents Foreword ..............................................................................................................6 Executive summary ..................................................................................................8 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions
    Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR & Junctions One Year After Study October 2016 Notice Although this report was commissioned by Highways England, the findings and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Highways England. While Highways England has made every effort to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Highways England does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of that information; and it cannot accept liability for any loss or damages of any kind resulting from reliance on the information or guidance this document contains. Post Opening Project Evaluation M1 J10-13 HSR and Junctions: One Year After Study Foreword Highways England’s motorways are some of the safest in the world. Our road network carries a third of road traffic and we have seen demand grow by a quarter since 2000 with continued growth forecast. One reason for the introduction is smart motorways is because there are more vehicles on the road. By making use of the full width of the road, smart motorways add that extra capacity to carry more vehicles and ease congestion. They have evolved from Controlled Motorways (with variable speed limits) to Dynamic Hard Shoulder Running (opening the hard shoulder as a running lane to traffic at busy periods) to All Lane Running (permanently removing the hard shoulder and converting it into a running lane). Compared to a traditional motorway widening they deliver: • Increased capacity at significantly less cost than traditional motorway widening. • New technology and variable speed limits to improve traffic flow.
    [Show full text]
  • A21 Briefing from Highways England July 2019
    A21 SEVENOAKS TO HASTINGS ALL PURPOSE TRUNK ROAD Overview The A21 travels north south through Kent (M25 Chipstead) to East Sussex (Hastings). The route has gradually been upgraded predominantly from the M25 southwards - the last major project being the Tonbridge to Pembury dualling scheme completed in 2018. The route features strongly in the Highways England, South Coast Central, Route Strategy in terms of safety and congestion. As a result, a preliminary study was carried out which considered the opportunities for safety improvements and any further capacity improvements. The route strategy will support possible options for further safety and capacity improvement needs. Details of the next RIS will be announced by Government later this year and will be prioritised on the basis of strategic need, deliverability, buildability and value for money. Works undertaken on the route (last 5 years) These are works that we have carried out on the network, as well as some additional investigative activities. 1. Tonbridge to Pembury A21 dualling scheme completed 2018. 2. Kent cycle scheme funded in conjunction with Tonbridge to Pembury major project. 3. Double white lining south of Whatlington at Stream Lane and Ricards Lane junction to reduce collisions resulting from overtaking manoeuvres. 4. Resurfacing at A21 Kiln Down and Hurst Green Village including new markings and strengthened verges. 5. Review of Hurst Green pedestrian crossing, adjustment of sensors in response to complaints. 6. New signal heads at Hurst Green School – replacement of failed existing signs. 7. Comprehensive assessment for the installation of average speed cameras – unfortunately the scheme did not meet DfT and police enforcement criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Published Project Report Ppr953
    PUBLISHED PROJECT REPORT PPR953 Perceptions of safety: findings from focus groups Posner R, Christmas S, Cooper A, Shepherd J, & Helman S Report details Report prepared for: Highways England Project/customer reference: 11225334 Copyright: © TRL Limited Report date: December 2019 Report status/version: Quality approval: Lucy Fuller Shaun Helman (Project Manager) (Technical Reviewer) Disclaimer This report has been produced by TRL Limited (TRL) under a contract with Highways England. Any views expressed in this report are not necessarily those of Highways England. The information contained herein is the property of TRL Limited and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the customer for whom this report was prepared. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure that the matter presented in this report is relevant, accurate and up-to-date, TRL Limited cannot accept any liability for any error or omission, or reliance on part or all of the content in another context. When purchased in hard copy, this publication is printed on paper that is FSC (Forest Stewardship Council) and TCF (Totally Chlorine Free) registered. Contents amendment record This report has been amended and issued as follows: Version Date Description Editor Technical Reviewer Draft v1 20/12/2019 RP SH Draft v2 15/01/2019 RP, SC SH Final report 13/03/2020 RP, SC SH Final report with 16/04/2020 Further client comments for RP, SC, SH further comments discussion SH for discussion Final report 17/04/2020 SH, SC SH Final delivered 07/05/2020 Final signed-off version
    [Show full text]