DOCSLIB.ORG

Southern Africa Week Special !

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Southern Africa Week Special ! NEWSLETTER OF THE SOUTHERN AFRICA SUPPORT PROJECT SASP P.O. BOX 50103 , Wash., D.C. 20004 vol. JO, No. 2 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SOUTHERN AFRICA WEEK SPECIAL ! •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• SASP, METRO COMMUNITY SOUTHERN AFRICA WEEK 1988 MARK 10 YEARS OF MAY 15-21 SOLIDARITY AND SUPPORT The annual week-long com­ Africa, SASP decided that future ma­ ORGANIZI munity education and material aid terial aid and education programs TO COMBAT campaign sponsored by the Southern would have a regional focus while high­ A RTHEID'S TERR R Africa Support Project (SASP) had its lighting the struggle ofBlack South Af­ beginnings in June of 1978 when SASP ricans inside of South Africa. Thus, in organized several community infonna­ the Spring of 1984 the first in a continu­ tion activities to generate an awareness ing series of annual "Southern Africa of the fight for self detennination taking Week" campaigns was initiated. place in Zimbabwe. 10 YEAR MILESTONE In 1980 SASP organized "Zimbabwe Week", an effort through 1988 marks the tenth anniver­ which the D.C. community contributed sary of the Southern Africa Support Africa to the community, as well as 3,000 pounds of clothing and almost Project and its annual community cam­ facilitate the appeal for material aid. $10,000 in financial support for educa­ paign to raise material aid and public More recently Howard University's tion and medical supplies to help Zim­ awareness about those in Southern WHMM-TV, Channel 32, has helped babwean refugees in Mozambique and Africa who are struggling to bring an to educate the local communtiy about Angola. Zimbabwe continued to be the end to apartheid and create a better life the situation in southern Africa. The focus of SASP's annual material aid for themselves. Since 1978 SASP, with UniversityoftheDistrictofColumbia's and public education campaign through the support and participation of the Black Film Institute has made it pos­ the first year of independence for Zim­ Washington, D.C. metropolitan com­ sible for SASP to acquire and present babwe. 1981 marked the first of three munity, has raised more than $190,000 informative audio visual programs dur­ annual "Namibia Week" campaigns in cash, medical and educational sup­ ing each of its campaigns. Church, ' which focused on educating the com­ plies to help the men, women and chil­ community organizations, and labor munity about the illegal occupation of dren of Southern Africa. unions have encouraged their members Namibia by South Africa, as well as to join with SASP in its annual efforts. providing medical and educational All of these achievements And while we should gather great pride supplies to the people of Namibia. would never have been reached without and inspiration from this solidarity, the a broad range of support from the D.C. increased repression of the South Afri­ Recognizing the continuing metropolitan area community. In every can government during the last two campaign of economic destabilization campaign since 1978 radio stations years should encourage and inspire us and military terrorism being waged WHUR and WPFW have each contrib­ all to mark this tenth anniversary with a against the independent countries of the uted hours of air time to allow SASP to renewed commitment to solidarity, southern Africa region by South, bring vital infonnation about South freedom and justice. WHMM TO AIR REVEALING FILM ON MOZAMBIQUE Nowhere is the battle against white minority rule more stark than in Mozambique. And never has a film captured the horror of Mozambican life today as has "Mozam­ bique: The Struggle for Survival" by independent film makers Bob and Amy Coen. The film was shot on location in Mozambique and ta1ces its audience from the arrival of Portuguese colonists 400 years ago through the death of its charismatic leader Samora Machel, to the situation on the ground today. "Mozambique: The Struggle for Survival" features ordinary Mozambicans whose lives have been touched by the war against the rebels of the Mozambique Na­ tional Resistance better known as RENAMO or the MNR. Mozambiques new president, Joaquim Chissano, explains his government's attitutde toward South Africa A Victim of MNR Te"or. and ther rebels. The film chronicles the development of the MNR, a sabotage those trade routes the region remains locked guerilla movement founded by the white governmnet in into South Africa's economy and vulnerable to pres­ neighboring Rhodesia nearly 20 yeras ago. For the first sure from Pretoria. Whoever controls Mozambique, time ever on camera, the creator of MNR, ex-Rhodesian the film argues, can determine the region's future. intelligence chief Ken Flower explains why he formed MNR and why he turned it over to the South Africans The film also discusses the options facing the United when Rhodesia became independent Zimbabwe in 1980. States as the Reagan administration comes under "Mozambique: The Struggle for Survival" analyzes the strong pressure to support the MNR. It provides importance of Mozambiques's three major transport Americans with the vital information they need to routes which make the country southern Africa's natural understand the key issues in southern Africa. Watch gateway to the outside world. As long as MNR rebels Channel 32, WHMM, Tuesday, May 17 at 9 p.m. HOW YOU CAN HELP PROJECTS FUNDED You can help the work of SASP by WITH SASP/D.C. FUNDS volunteering to join our strike force list; strike force members are During the past year the following projects have been on-call to participate in demon­ supported with funds raised during Southern Africa Week strations and other direct actions and other campaigns: that express our dissatisfaction with U.S. policy in southern Af­ • October 1987 - $3,000 in medical supplies to victims rica. SASP also needs volunteers of drought and MNR attacks. to help publicize the worldwide boycott of Shell Oil and its prod­ • March 1988 - $8,000 in educational supplies for ucts. You can also help us during two projects sponsored by the the annual Southern Africa Week programs by volunteering to work Angolan Women's Organization during the radiothon, or other ac­ tivities that ta1ce place during the week. SOUTH AFRICA'S REGIONAL AGGRESSION FACTS WE SHOULD KNOW UNITA: SOUTHERN AFRICA'S BLOODY TRAITORS The campaign of terror and destruction carried out in Angola by rebels of the National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNIT A), is financed and as­ sisted by the apartheid regime of South Africa. South Africa provides logistic, material and other support to help ensure that the people of Angola will not live normal lives and develop land denied to them by 400 years of Portu­ guese colonialism. UNITA has mined roads, growing fields and other areas frequented by peasants as they go about their daily tasks. UNITA mines have helped to give Angola the highest amputee population in the world. UNITA leader Jonas Savim bi boasts of recognition by many nations, when in fact his support comes mainly from right-wing regimes around the world. His newest and most avid supporters are theReagan administration and the right wing establishment in the U.S. The only leader on the African continent that will acknowledge support for Savimbi and UNITA is South Africa; no leader in Africa wants to be seen with Savimbi ! ANGOLAN AMPUTEE: VICTIM OF UNIT A MINES SOUTH AFRICA'S REGIONAL TERROR • In 1987, an average of 14,200 people were in detention "' The Mozambique National Resistance (MNR), the in South African prisons each day . South African sponsored rebels in Mozambique, are responsible for destroying over 200 schools in the prov­ • In March 1988, South African agents entered Botswana ince of Maputo over the past 5 years. and killed two South African refugees, and two women who were citizens of Botswana; after shooting their •Even the U.S. State Department has recognized the victims, the South African raiders poured gasoline on the wanton destruction that is the hallmark of the MNR; an house and burned the bodies as well as the structure. South April 1988 report stated that: MNR attacks have driven African officials claim to have been conducting pre­ over 872,000 refugees to surrounding countries and that emptive strikes against ANC guerillas. over 100,000 may have been killed by the rebels. • In March 1988, the Paris representative of the ANC, "' To find out about the origins of the MNR read, 'De­ Dulcie September was shot twice in the face while structive Engagement: Southern Africa at War', by David entering her office. Martin and Phyllis Johnson, and' Serving Secretly - An Intelligence Chief on Record: Rhodesia Into Zimbabwe - • ANC representatives have said that its members in 1964-81, by Ken Flower. Both sources tell how South Canada, the U.S., Australia, Rome, Bonn and Stockholm Africa supplied and directed MNR attacks and atrocities have all been threatened. against innocent Mozambicans. SOUTHERN AFRICA: REGION UNDER SIEGE While it is important to continue to try,ithasonly 8millionpeople. Because expose South African government of its abundant mineral reserves, some atrocities against Black South Africans, geologists consider Angola one of the it is also important to recognize that richest countries of southern Africa. REPUBLIC ) South African brutality and repression Since the Popular Movement for the \ OF (po"o ~ SOUTH AFRICA reaches well beyond its borders. South Liberation of Angola (MPLA) came to Africa has used all means to destabilize power in 1975, South Africa has its neighbors. A brief profile of some of launched numerous attacks, raids and in­ those countries will lead to a better vasions of Angolan territory while con­ understanding of the southern African tinuing to advise, coordinate and finance after a long period of liberation war region and the need to continue to the anti-government rebels called against a white-led regime.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa Faculty Research Working Paper Series
    Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa Faculty Research Working Paper Series James K. Sebenius Harvard Business School R. Nicholas Burns Harvard Kennedy School Robert H. Mnookin Harvard Law School L. Alexander Green Harvard Business School December 2016 RWP16-059 Visit the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series at: https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/workingpapers/Index.aspx The views expressed in the HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. Faculty Research Working Papers have not undergone formal review and approval. Such papers are included in this series to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. Copyright belongs to the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. www.hks.harvard.edu Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa James K. Sebenius R. Nicholas Burns Harvard Business School Harvard Kennedy School Robert H. Mnookin L. Alexander Green Harvard Law School Harvard Business School Working Paper 17-051 Copyright © 2016 by James K. Sebenius Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2883212 Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa by James K. Sebenius, R. Nicholas Burns, Robert H. Mnookin, and L. Alexander Green* December 9, 2016 v1.2 Abstract: In 1976, United States Secretary of State Henry A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gordian Knot: Apartheid & the Unmaking of the Liberal World Order, 1960-1970
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: APARTHEID & THE UNMAKING OF THE LIBERAL WORLD ORDER, 1960-1970 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Ryan Irwin, B.A., M.A. History ***** The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Professor Peter Hahn Professor Robert McMahon Professor Kevin Boyle Professor Martha van Wyk © 2010 by Ryan Irwin All rights reserved. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines the apartheid debate from an international perspective. Positioned at the methodological intersection of intellectual and diplomatic history, it examines how, where, and why African nationalists, Afrikaner nationalists, and American liberals contested South Africa’s place in the global community in the 1960s. It uses this fight to explore the contradictions of international politics in the decade after second-wave decolonization. The apartheid debate was never at the center of global affairs in this period, but it rallied international opinions in ways that attached particular meanings to concepts of development, order, justice, and freedom. As such, the debate about South Africa provides a microcosm of the larger postcolonial moment, exposing the deep-seated differences between politicians and policymakers in the First and Third Worlds, as well as the paradoxical nature of change in the late twentieth century. This dissertation tells three interlocking stories. First, it charts the rise and fall of African nationalism. For a brief yet important moment in the early and mid-1960s, African nationalists felt genuinely that they could remake global norms in Africa’s image and abolish the ideology of white supremacy through U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Enue, NE • Washington, OC 20002 • 202/546-7961
    WASHINGTON OFFICE ON AFRICA EDUCATIONAL FUND 110 Maryland Avenue, NE • Washington, OC 20002 • 202/546-7961 October 22, 1987 • EN M • ural Terr rism al W rk What is Renamo? operate from bases in Mozambique. In 1976 Ken Flower, Director General of Rhodesia's Central Intelligence Organi­ ln 1975, Portugal ceded power to Mozambique's single zation (CIO), formed the Mozambique National Resistance, overwhelmingly popular independence movement, the Front for known as Renamo or the MNR, to "provide the opportunity for the Liberation of Mozambique (FRELIMO) following a military Rhodesia to deal with Zanla (ZANU's military wing) in Mozam­ revoit in Portugal precipitated by over a decade of successful bique without doing so directly, and to perpetuate or create armed struggle by FRELIMO. The new Frelimo government instability in areas of Mozambique." soon agreed to allow the Zimbabwe African National Union Flower hired Andre Matzangaiza to lead Renamo, and (ZANU), one of Rhodesia's two main liberation movements, to provided Matzangaiza and his recruits with food, housing and equipment. During the late 1970s, the CIO attributed a number of attacks it made on Mozambique to Renamo, and directed Renamo's infrequent military operations. Renamo gained little experience in battle, and Matzangaiza was killed in 1979 during SOUTHERN one of Renamo's few attempts to attack the Mozambican army. TANZANIA Flower replaced Matzangaiza with Afonso Dhlakama, who AFRICA today is still the nominal head of Renamo. Despite Renamo activities, FRELIMO allowed the Zimbabwe African National Union to operate bases in Mozambique, and was instrumental in helping Zimbabwe achieve independence ANGOLA in 1980.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brutal State of Affairs: the Rise and Fall of Rhodesia
    Book review A brutal state of affairs: The rise and fall of Rhodesia Henrik Ellert and Dennis Anderson 2020 Weaver Press, Harare 412 pp. ISBN 978-1-77922-373-9 (p/b); 987-1-77922-374-6 (pdf); 978-1-77922-375-3 (ePub). Reviewed by Martin Rupiya, Ph.D., Innovation and Training Manager at ACCORD The story about the perpetrators of violence and its impact, associated with the political history of the territory of Southern Rhodesia, Rhodesia and Zimbabwe, remains incomplete. Four decades after the end of the War of Liberation (1966–1979), two participants, Dennis Malcolm Anderson and Henrik Ellert who (in 1956–1979 and 1964–1979, respectively) worked in the British South Africa Police’s Criminal Investigation Department, the Special Branch, and later in the Combined Operations (COMOPS) structure, have joined forces to document their perspectives on the operational role and methods of ‘white nationalism’ executing brutal and ‘violent power retention’ operations. Their renditions have been combined and aligned up until their retirements in 1979 and into the early years of independent Zimbabwe from April 1980 (p. ix). The work therefore represents a combined 39 years’ service and 140 Book review exposition in the country’s politico-military history, informed by intelligence operatives who occupied front row seats as they worked in the ‘Ops Rooms’ of ‘Operation Hurricane’ and ‘Operation Thrasher’, as well as manning the ‘Terrorist Desk’ in COMOPS until the end of the war. This experience, coupled with their unique, post-retirement ability to have access to key informants, such as Marda Fairlie, daughter of the late head of the Central Intelligence Organisation Ken Flower, who allowed them to use her notes from the ‘archives that were not included in his book, Serving Secretly’ (p.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of the Use of Bacteriological and Chemical Agents During Zimbabwe’S Liberation War of 1965–80 by Rhodesian Forces
    Third World Quarterly, Vol 23, No 6, pp 1159–1179, 2002 The history of the use of bacteriological and chemical agents during Zimbabwe’s liberation war of 1965–80 by Rhodesian forces IAN MARTINEZ ABSTRACT In 1979 the largest recorded outbreak of anthrax occurred in Rhodesia, present day Zimbabwe. The incident, widely known in Africa and in intelligence circles is not widely known in the USA or Europe. At the time Rhodesia was fighting a guerilla war against black nationalist insurgents. Rhodesia first accused the nationalist side of using anthrax as a weapon. In allegations that surfaced in 1998—and which persist to this day—external researchers and the current government of Zimbabwe insist that the outbreak in 1978–80 was anything but benign. They argue that the original outbreak was the result of a calculated move by the Rhodesian government with the duplicitous acknowledgment of apartheid South Africa. Furthermore, the government alleges that a current outbreak is the work of disgruntled white farmers in the country. The allegations over the 1979–80 outbreak are given credence by the acknow- ledgement by Ken Flower, Chief of Rhodesia’s Central Intelligence Organisation (CIO), and by CIO Officer Henrik Ellert that the white minority regime of Ian Smith used biological and chemical weapons against the guerillas, against rural blacks to prevent their support of the guerillas and against cattle to reduce rural food stocks. The current government and researchers have drawn inferences from his statements to show that the unusual outbreak in
    [Show full text]
  • Truth and Access to Information About Past Human Rights Violations
    “WHO WANTS TO FORGET?” Truth and Access to Information about past Human Rights Violations “When considering the question should we remember? it is very important to firstly ask, has any victim forgotten? Could they ever forget? Secondly we should ask, who wants to forget? Who benefits when all the atrocities stay silent in the past?” (Roberto Cabrera – Guatemalan human rights activist) ARTICLE 19 The Global Campaign for Free Expresson Contents Introduction ..................................................................................... 1 1. Truth and the right to know ........................................................ 3 2. Malawi ........................................................................................ 10 3. Zimbabwe................................................................................... 19 4. Namibia ...................................................................................... 29 5. Approaches to uncovering the facts........................................ 36 5.1 Official commissions .......................................................................... 36 5.2 Opening the files ................................................................................. 43 5.3 Criminal justice and civil compensation ........................................... 48 5.4 Other sorts of national institution...................................................... 52 5.5 The media............................................................................................. 53 5.6 Museums.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The PIDE/DGS's Dealings with Rhodesia and South Africa
    Article Journal of Contemporary History 2014, Vol. 49(2) 366–389 Parallel Diplomacy, ! The Author(s) 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav Parallel War: The DOI: 10.1177/0022009413515536 PIDE/DGS’s Dealings jch.sagepub.com with Rhodesia and South Africa, 1961–74 Filipe Ribeiro de Meneses National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Ireland Robert McNamara University of Ulster, Ireland Abstract PIDE/DGS, Portugal’s secret police during the New State (1932–74), had an important role to play in the country’s colonial wars, which lasted from 1961 to 1974. Using documentation circulated at meetings held regularly with the police forces and intelli- gence services of UDI Rhodesia and South Africa, this article attempts to reveal the scale, and the limitations, of PIDE/DGS’s ambitions in that conflict. Keywords decolonization, PIDE, Portugal, Rhodesia, South Africa, war On 18 May 1974, The Economist published a scathing attack on the recently extin- guished Portuguese political police, the DGS (Direcc¸a˜ o Geral de Seguranc¸a, better known by its previous name, PIDE (Polı´cia Internacional e de Defesa do Estado)), whose headquarters, in the wake of the revolution of 25 April, was now in the hands of the military. The unnamed correspondent discounted lingering fears about the PIDE agents still at large: ‘I doubt whether those of its members who are still at liberty could constitute a threat to anyone but themselves’. The PIDE was portrayed as hopelessly old-fashioned. Officers were of poor quality; there were no computer- ized records; workshops and labs were out of date; the political indoctrination of the agents ‘would have pleased someone like Marshal Pe´tain 40 years ago’.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa
    Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa James K. Sebenius R. Nicholas Burns Robert H. Mnookin L. Alexander Green Working Paper 17-051 Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa James K. Sebenius R. Nicholas Burns Harvard Business School Harvard Kennedy School Robert H. Mnookin L. Alexander Green Harvard Law School Harvard Business School Working Paper 17-051 Copyright © 2016 by James K. Sebenius Working papers are in draft form. This working paper is distributed for purposes of comment and discussion only. It may not be reproduced without permission of the copyright holder. Copies of working papers are available from the author. Henry Kissinger: Negotiating Black Majority Rule in Southern Africa by James K. Sebenius, R. Nicholas Burns, Robert H. Mnookin, and L. Alexander Green* December 9, 2016 v1.2 Abstract: In 1976, United States Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger conducted a series of intricate, multiparty negotiations in Southern Africa to persuade white Rhodesian leader Ian Smith to accede to black majority rule. Conducted near the end of President Gerald Ford’s term in office, against substantial U.S. domestic opposition, Kissinger’s efforts culminated in Smith’s public announcement that he would accept majority rule within two years. This set the stage for the later Lancaster House negotiations which resulted in the actual transition to black majority rule. The account in this working paper carefully describes—but does not analyze nor draw lessons from —these challenging negotiations. Forthcoming papers will provide analysis and derive general insights from Kissinger’s negotiations to end white minority rule in Rhodesia.
    [Show full text]
  • Mozambique Emergency Appeai4 February 1988
    MOZAMBIQUE EMERGENCY APPEAI4 FEBRUARY 1988 Green Zones Hold Promise Mozambique: Apartheid's for Mozambique Second Front? Mozambique is a country of great beauty and great potential. It was once food self-sufficient and could be again. But continuing violence draws re­ The crisis in Mozambique is directly linked to sources away from development and drains strength and hope from the people. the current instability in Southern Africa In the capital city of Maputo, located on a beautiful stretch of sandy beach according to the Ecumenical Documentation along the Indian ocean, life seems to go on as usual, removed from the violence and Information Centre for Eastern and of the countryside. There are shortages of almost everything, but consumer Southern Africa. Under increasing interna­ goods-though very expensive by local standards-are plentiful. The markets tional pressure to dismantle apartheid, South Africa is engaged in a regional destabilization The zones provide a viable alternative for food production in strategy designed to preserve its regional Mozambique, where 85 percent of the rural population has tradi­ dominance. tionally relied on subsistence fanning. The Ecumenical Documentation and Informa­ tion Center, based in Harare, is sponsored by are filled with fresh vegetables and fruit-oranges, papayas, lettuce, tomatoes, 12 African Christian Councils. The Center carrots, onions, potatoes, cabbage-grown in the "zonas verdes," or green reports that since 1981, Mozambique'Srail sys­ zones cultivated and irrigated mainly by small cooperatives just outside the tem has been systematically sabotaged, city. The zones provide a viable alternative for food production in Mozambique, destroying access for neighboring countries, where 85 percent of the rural population has traditionally relied on subsistence and depriving Mozambique of one third of its farming.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/24/2021 09:39:03PM Via Free Access
    international journal of military history and historiography 39 (2019) 88-120 IJMH brill.com/ijmh Unsung Heroes? The Rhodesian Defence Regiment and Counterinsurgency, 1973–80 Evans B. Tsigo1 Bindura University of Science Education [email protected] Enock Ndawana2 University of Johannesburg and University of Zimbabwe [email protected] Abstract This article examines the Rhodesian Defence Regiment’s role in the Rhodesian Secu- rity Forces’ counterinsurgency efforts against the Zimbabwe African National Libera- tion Army and Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army guerrillas. It argues that the two guerrilla armies successfully used sabotage targeting installations of strategic and economic significance to Rhodesia. This compelled the Rhodesian regime to change its policy of restricting the conscription of Coloured and Asian minorities into the Rhodesian Security Forces to undertake combat duties beyond defensive roles. How- ever, the Rhodesian Defence Regiment largely failed to serve its key duty of countering the guerrilla tactic of sabotage against all major installations and centres of strategic and economic importance. The article concludes that the failure was due to the many 1 Evans B. Tsigo is a postgraduate student at the Bindura University of Science Education. He holds a BA Hons in War and Strategic Studies from the University of Zimbabwe and is inter- ested in Zimbabwean military history. 2 Enock Ndawana is a PhD candidate in the Department of Politics and International Rela- tions, University of Johannesburg, South Africa and a temporary-full time lecturer in the War and Strategic Studies Section of the History Department, University of Zimbabwe, Zimba- bwe. His research interests include: human security, African peace and politics, gender and conflict, conflict resolution and transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain and Rhodesia: the Route to Settlement
    Britain and Rhodesia: The Route to Settlement edited by Dr Michael Kandiah & Dr Sue Onslow ICBH Oral History Programme Britain and Rhodesia: The Route to Settlement The ICBH is grateful to the Institute of Historical Research for its support of the witness seminar programme. ICBH Oral History Programme Programme Director: Dr Michael D. Kandiah © Institute of Contemporary British History, 2008 All rights reserved. This material is made available for use for personal research and study. We give per- mission for the entire files to be downloaded to your computer for such personal use only. For reproduction or further distribution of all or part of the file (except as constitutes fair dealing), permission must be sought from CCBH. Published by Institute of Contemporary British History King’s College London Strand London WC2R 2LS ISBN: 1-905165-23-4 ISBN-13: 978-1-905165-23-0 Britain and Rhodesia: Route to Settlement Edited by Dr Michael Kandiah and Dr Sue Onslow Seminar held 5 July 2005 at The National Archives, Kew Organised by: Institute of Contemporary British History The Cold War Studies Centre, LSE The National Archives Contents Contributors 9 Citation Guidance 11 Questions for Consideration, Sue Onslow 13 Chronology, Sue Onslow 17 Seminar Transcript Session One 49 Session Two 79 Session Three 107 Interview with Sir Michael Palliser 129 Contributors Chairs: PROFESSOR TERENCE Rhodes Professor of Race Relations, and Fellow of St Antony’s RANGER, FBA College, University of Oxford, 1987–97, now Emeritus Profes- sor and Fellow. PROFESSOR ARNE Cold War Studies Centre, London School of Economics and WESTAD Political Science Participants: SIR BRIAN BARDER Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Head of Central and KCMG Southern, later Southern African Department, 1978–82.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspicuous Destruction
    CONSPICUOUS DESTRUCTION War, Famine and the Reform Process in Mozambique An Africa Watch Report Human Rights Watch New York !!! Washington !!! Los Angeles !!! London ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The bulk of the research and writing for this report was done by Karl Maier, a consultant to Africa Watch, during 1990B91. Additional material provided was by Kemal Mustafa, Africa Watch researcher, in 1991, and Alex Vines, Africa Watch consultant, in 1992. Ben Penglase, Africa Watch associate wrote the chapter on U.S. policy. The report was edited by Alex de Waal, Associate Director of Africa Watch. Africa Watch would like to thank the Mozambique government for extending an invitation to visit Mozambique and for facilitating the research upon which this report is based. We would also like to thank the many Mozambicans who have contributed their experiences to the report. Africa Watch is grateful to the J. Roderick MacArthur Foundation for a grant in support of its research on human rights in Mozambique. Copyright 8 July 1992 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalogue Card No.: 92-73261 ISBN 1-56432-079-0 Cover design by Deborah Thomas. Africa Watch Africa Watch was established in May 1988 to monitor and promote observance of internationally recognized human rights in Africa. The chair of Africa Watch is William Carmichael. Alice Brown is the vice chair. Rakiya Omaar, is the executive director. Alex deWaal is associate director. Janet Fleischman and Karen Sorensen are research associates. Barbara Baker, Urmi Shah and Ben Penglase are associates. Human Rights Watch Human Rights Watch is composed of Africa Watch, Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch, Middle East Watch and the Fund for Free Expression.
    [Show full text]