Cold Work Safety Manual Page 1 of 13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cold Work Safety Manual Page 1 of 13 BP U.S. Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) Cold Work Safety Manual Page 1 of 13 Cold Work 1. Purpose The purpose of this policy is to establish the US Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) requirements for controlling and managing a wide range of risks associated with the performance of “cold work” as defined herein. 2. Scope This policy applies to all employees and contractors while performing cold work on behalf of USPL. The following policies and procedures are either referenced or are applicable to this policy and should be consulted for specific related requirements and guidance: • Authorization to Work • Radiation Safety • Diving Procedures • Respiratory Protection Policy • Electrical Safety • Shift Handover Procedure • Lessons Learned Procedure • Stop Work Procedure • Level 2 Hazards Identification and • Working at Heights Task Risk Assessments (HITRA) Procedure • Lockout Program 3. Minimum Requirements Supporting Minimum Requirements Documentation 1. A Cold Work Permit shall be completed and issued prior to conducting any permitted cold Section 6 & work as defined in this policy. Appendix II 2. All Cold Work Permits shall be issued by an Asset Operator (or Asset Operator Designee) Section 5 & 6 and shall be received by a Performing Authority. Self-permitting is prohibited. 3. A Level 2 HITRA shall be conducted prior to issuance of Cold Work Permits specified in Section 6 Section 6. 4. Individuals performing cold work roles shall be trained and competent to execute their Section 7 responsibilities as defined in this policy. 5. All personnel performing work on behalf of USPL have the responsibility and authority to Section 5 stop any work they consider to be unsafe. 4. Definitions Asset Operator (AO)—A BP employee who is responsible for the operation of the asset where work is being performed. The Asset Operator shall be accountable for the asset equipment being in a safe condition for the scope of work to be performed. The Asset Operator or an Asset Operator Designee (if used) is responsible for the completion of the ATW form. Revision Date: July 8, 2014 Effective Date: December 31, 2014 Next Review Date: July 8, 2019 Paper copies are uncontrolled and valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found in DRM in the HSSE Policies folder. BP U.S. Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) Cold Work Safety Manual Page 2 of 13 Asset Operator Designee (AOD)—A BP employee or contractor individual who is authorized to issue ATWs and / or permits on behalf of the Asset Operator. Note: Reference the Authorization to Work policy for additional information Authorization to Work (ATW)—An approved management system that controls work in a safe manner through the use of the ATW form. Boundary—For the purposes of this policy, an approach limit as applied to electrical safety: • Arc flash boundary—When an arc flash hazard exists, an approach limit at a distance from a prospective arc source within which a person could receive a second degree burn if an electrical arc flash were to occur. • Limited approach boundary—An approach limit at a distance from an exposed energized electrical conductor or circuit part within which a shock hazard exists. • Prohibited approach boundary—An approach limit at a distance from an exposed energized electrical conductor or circuit part within which there is an increased risk of shock, due to electrical arc-over combined with inadvertent movement, for personnel working in close proximity to the energized electrical conductor or circuit part. • Restricted approach boundary—An approach limit at a distances from an exposed energized electrical conductor or circuit part within which a shock hazard exists. Cold Work—Cold work is a work classification that includes construction, maintenance, demolition, remediation, operation or other work that does not fall into one of the following categories. • Confined Space Entry • Excavation • Hot Work • Lifting and Rigging Exposed (as applied to electrical live parts)—Capable of being inadvertently touched or approached nearer than a safe distance by a person. It is applied to parts that are not suitably guarded, isolated or insulated. Isolations—Blocking in, blinding or lockout of equipment or systems Job Site—Within visual proximity of the work being performed Level 2 Hazard Identification Task Risk Assessment (HITRA)—Is a structured process to identify the hazards and specify actions to mitigate these hazards for a work activity or task. On-site—Physically being on the property or within the property fence line where work is being performed Overrides—Controls or interlocks that have been bypassed or disabled Performing Authority—A BP employee or individual contractor who receives a permit once it has been issued by the Asset Operator or Asset Operator Designee. The Performing Authority is responsible for ensuring that everyone working under a specific permit adheres to the permit’s documented conditions. Note: Reference the Authorization to Work policy for additional information Permit Issuance—The act of the Asset Operator or Asset Operator Designee issuing a permit to a Performing Authority. Permit Issuance is documented in Section C of the ATW form. Note: Reference the Authorization to Work policy for additional information Permit Issuance Delegation—The act of the Asset Operator delegating the responsibility of issuing permits to an Asset Operator Designee on behalf of the Asset Operator. Permit Issuance Delegation is documented in section D of the ATW form. Permit Register— A log for recording the status of permits and Lock Outs Tag Outs (LOTOs). Revision Date: July 8, 2014 Effective Date: December 31, 2014 Next Review Date: July 8, 2019 Paper copies are uncontrolled and valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found in DRM in the HSSE Policies folder. BP U.S. Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) Cold Work Safety Manual Page 3 of 13 Permitted Cold Work is work that requires a Cold Work Permit and may require a Level 2 Hazard Identification and Task Risk Assessment (HITRA). The types of Permitted Cold Work include the following which are defined in Section 6.1: • Breaking Containment Pressure Relief • Diving • Energized Electrical Work • Movement of Heavy Equipment inside a Facility • Radiation Source • Toxic Substance Exposure • Work at Heights Qualified person—One who has skills and knowledge related to the construction and operation of the electrical equipment and installations and has received safety training to recognize and avoid the hazards involved. Shall—is used where a provision is mandatory. Should—is used where a provision is preferred. Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS)—Separate activities including product movement or work tasks that have the potential to impact each other. Workforce—Any BP employee or contractor who is engaged in performing work on behalf of USPL 5. Roles and Responsibilities 5.1. Asset Operator (or designee) A. Shall issue permits to the Performing Authority or can delegate permit issuance to the AOD. 1. Shall review and verify that permit conditions are deemed acceptable for the defined scope of work and affected equipment. B. Shall determine if changes can be made to a permit if permit conditions are exceeded or if the permit should be cancelled and a new permit issued. 1. If the Asset Operator determines that changes to the permit can be made, he / she shall document their approval of the changes by initialing the changes where they are documented on the permit. Note: Refer to the Authorization to Work policy for additional requirements. 5.2. Performing Authority A. Shall receive permits from the Asset Operator or Asset Operator Designee. B. Shall monitor the permitted cold work and verify that the work is performed within the conditions documented on the Cold Work Permit C. Shall reassess the job site and revalidate the permit before work can resume if permitted work is interrupted or if the job site is left unattended, or if necessary, cancels the permit and returns it to the AO / AOD. D. Shall stop work, suspend the permit, and notify the AO / AOD if permit conditions are exceeded. E. Shall verify that changes to permits issued by phone-validation are verbally approved by the Asset Operator or Asset Operator Designee if utilized, and shall initial approved changes on the permit and communicate them to the workforce before allowing work to recommence (see Section 6.3.H). Revision Date: July 8, 2014 Effective Date: December 31, 2014 Next Review Date: July 8, 2019 Paper copies are uncontrolled and valid only at the time of printing. The controlled version of this document can be found in DRM in the HSSE Policies folder. BP U.S. Pipelines and Logistics (USPL) Cold Work Safety Manual Page 4 of 13 Note: Refer to the Authorization to Work policy for additional requirements. 5.3. Workforce A. Shall participate in the development and / or review of Level 2 HITRAs. B. Shall verify that equipment used in performing work is fit for purpose through visual inspection and / or review of any certification. C. Shall stop work per Stop Work Procedure if conditions change in such a way that permit conditions or controls listed in the permit are not in compliance. D. Shall report any lessons identified per Lessons Learned Procedure. Note: Refer to the Authorization to Work policy for additional requirements. 6. Cold Work Permit A Cold Work Permit (Appendix lll) is a formal documented agreement between the Asset Operator and the Performing Authority that along with a completed ATW and a Level 2 HITRA (if applicable), authorizes the performance of the tasks specifically identified in the permit. 6.1. Types of Permitted Cold Work Note: A Level 2 HITRA is required for the following Cold Work Permits: Breaking Containment Pressure Relief, Diving, Energized Electrical Work, Toxic Substance Exposure, and Work at Heights.
Recommended publications
  • Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment Risk Assessment Forum
    EPA/100/B-19/001 October 2019 www.epa.gov/risk Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment Risk Assessment Forum EPA/100/B-19/001 October 2019 Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment Risk Assessment Forum U.S. Environmental Protection Agency DISCLAIMER This document has been reviewed in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) policy. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. Preferred citation: U.S. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2019). Guidelines for Human Exposure Assessment. (EPA/100/B-19/001). Washington, D.C.: Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. EPA. Page | ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DISCLAIMER ..................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF TABLES.............................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... viii LIST OF BOXES ................................................................................................................................ ix ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS .............................................................................................. x PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................... xi AUTHORS, CONTRIBUTORS AND
    [Show full text]
  • Safety Manual
    Eastern Elevator Safety and Health Manual January 2017 Page 1 of 125 SAFETY AND HEALTH MANUAL Index by Section Number Safety Policy ................................................................................................................. …4 Section 1: General Health and Safety Policies ............................................................. …5 Section 2: Hazard Communication ................................................................................ ..13 Section 3: Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ......................................................... ..18 Section 4: Emergency Action Plan ................................................................................ ..31 Section 5: Fall Protection .............................................................................................. ..34 Section 6: Ladder Safety ............................................................................................... ..38 Section 7: Bloodborne Pathogens ................................................................................ ..42 Section 8: Motor Vehicle / Fleet Safety ......................................................................... ..47 Section 9: Hearing Conservation .................................................................................. ..50 Section 10: Lockout / Tagout ........................................................................................ ..53 Section 11: Fire Prevention ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A PRACTICAL GUIDE for USE of REAL TIME DETECTION SYSTEMS for WORKER PROTECTION and COMPLIANCE with OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS May 2019
    A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USE OF REAL TIME DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR WORKER PROTECTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS May 2019 WHITE PAPER May 2019 A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USE OF REAL TIME DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR WORKER PROTECTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS Prepared by: Energy Facility Contractor’s Group (EFCOG) Industrial Hygiene and Safety Task Group and Members of the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Exposure Assessment Strategies Group Dina Siegel1, David Abrams 2, John Hill3, Steven Jahn2, Phil Smith2, Kayla Thomas4 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory 2 AIHA Exposure Assessment Strategies Committee 3 Savannah River Site 4 Kansas City National Security Campus A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USE OF REAL TIME DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR WORKER PROTECTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS May 2019 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 2.0 Introduction 3.0 Discussion 3.1 Occupational Exposure Assessment 3.2 Regulatory Compliance 3.3 Occupational Exposure Limits 3.4 Traditional Use of Real Time Detection Systems 3.5 Use and Limitations of Real Time Detection Systems 3.6 Use of Real Time Detection Systems for Compliance 3.7 Documentation/Reporting of Real Time Detection Systems Results 3.8 Peak Exposures Data Interpretations 3.9 Conclusions 4.0 Matrices 5.0 References 6.0 Attachments Page | 2 A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR USE OF REAL TIME DETECTION SYSTEMS FOR WORKER PROTECTION AND COMPLIANCE WITH OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE LIMITS May 2019 1.0 Executive Summary This white paper presents practical guidance for field industrial hygiene personnel in the use and application of real time detection systems (RTDS) for exposure monitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary File 2: Assessment of Quality and Bias
    Supplementary File 2: Assessment of quality and bias In preparing the tool, it was not possible to identify a dominant factor for which studies should be controlled for, instead recognising several key variables. Comparability was therefore scored against a single criterion of ‘effectively controlling for relevant factors’, meaning a maximum of eight points, rather than nine, were available. Where a nested cohort or matched case group was identified within an interventional study, it was agreed that the quality of the study as applied to impact of ETS would be appraised, and not the main interventional study outcomes. This acknowledged that high quality trials not relevant to the impact of ETS exposure could contain poor quality cohorts that were appropriate for inclusion, or vice versa. A point was awarded for satisfactory response on each question, indicated by a tick in the relevant table. Cohort Outcome Measures Domain and outcomes Point Representativeness of the exposed cohort A Truly representative of the paediatric population undergoing surgery B Somewhat representative of the paediatric population undergoing surgery C Selected subgroup of the population undergoing surgery D No description of the cohort selection process Selection of the non-exposed cohort A Drawn from the same community as the exposed cohort B Drawn from a different source C No description of the derivation of the non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure A Secure record (e.g. surgical record, biological test) B Structured interview C Written self-report of self-completed questionnaire D No description Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of the study A Yes B No Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis A Study controls for reasonable factors (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure Assessment Concepts
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University, Patrick Breysse, and Peter S. J. Lees. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. Exposure Assessment Concepts Patrick N. Breysse, PhD, CIH Peter S.J. Lees, PhD, CIH Johns Hopkins University Section A Introduction Origin of Hygiene Hygeia was the Greek goddess of health Rene Dubos wrote: “For the worshippers of Hygeia, health is … a positive attribute to which men are entitled if they govern their lives wisely” Prevention is key 4 Exposure—Definition Contact between the outer boundary of the human body (skin, nose, lungs, GI tract) and a contaminant Requires the simultaneous presence of a contaminant and the contact between the person and that medium Quantified by concentration of contaminant and time and frequency of contact 5 Route of Exposure Inhalation Ingestion Dermal Direct injection Inhalation is most common in workplace—but not in general environment Moving towards concept of total exposure 6 Exposure Assessment Magnitude – Concentration in media (ppm, f/cc) Duration – Minutes, hours, days, working life, lifetime Frequency – Daily, weekly, seasonally 7 Types of Air Sampling: Time Source: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Exposure Assessment (Excluding Health
    (excluding health Community Exposure Assessment care providers) Physical distance >2 Duration of interaction1 Ventilation3 Source control and PPE Risk assessment metres maintained2 Case and contact are both wearing masks (cloth or medical); OR Case is wearing both a mask (cloth or Low risk medical) and a face shield4 regardless of PPE worn by (self-monitor)5 <15 minutes (except No Regardless of contact; OR Contact is wearing both a mask and eye for very brief ventilation protection regardless of PPE worn by case interactions such as High risk passing by someone) Either case or contact is not wearing a mask (self-isolate)6 Regardless of Low risk Yes Regardless of PPE worn by either case or contact ventilation (self-monitor) Case and contact are both wearing masks (cloth or medical); OR Case is wearing both a mask (cloth or Low risk medical) and a face shield regardless of PPE worn (self-monitor) Well by contact; OR Contact is wearing both a mask and ventilated eye protection regardless of PPE worn by case No High risk Either case or contact is not wearing a mask (self-isolate) Poorly High risk Regardless of PPE worn by either case or contact ventilated (self-isolate) 15 minutes – 1 hour Well Low risk Regardless of PPE worn by either case or contact ventilated (self-monitor) Case and contact are both wearing masks (cloth or medical); OR Case is wearing both a mask (cloth or Low risk Yes medical) and a face shield regardless of PPE worn (self-monitor) Poorly by contact; OR Contact is wearing both a mask and ventilated eye protection regardless of PPE worn by case High risk Either case or contact is not wearing a mask (self-isolate) COVID-19 Info-Line 905-688-8248 press 7 Toll-free: 1-888-505-6074 niagararegion.ca/COVID19 Created December 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • VHA Dir 7702, Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment Program
    Department of Veterans Affairs VHA DIRECTIVE 7702 Veterans Health Administration Transmittal Sheet Washington, DC 20420 April 29, 2016 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1. REASON FOR ISSUE: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has developed this program to meet Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) requirements established by VA Directive 7700, Occupational Safety and Health. This Directive specifies actions and expected performance criteria for Industrial Hygiene programs. 2. SUMMARY OF CONTENTS: Hazardous exposures adversely impact VHA staff, patients, and visitors. This Directive establishes VHA policy for implementing the Industrial Hygiene Exposure Assessment Program. The Program establishes the responsibilities and procedures for preventing adverse health effects from occupational exposures, ensures compliance with laws and regulations mandating a safe and healthful working environment, and provides a comprehensive approach for prioritizing and managing occupational exposure risks. The systemic approach described in this Directive will allow designated staff to anticipate, recognize, evaluate, and control occupational exposure hazards present in VHA facilities. 3. RELATED ISSUES: VA Directive 7700 and VHA Directive 7701. 4. RESPONSIBLE OFFICE: The Director, Office of Occupational Safety Health and Green Environmental Management (GEMS) Programs (10NA8) is responsible for the contents of this Directive. Questions may be referred to 202-632-7889. 5. RESCISSIONS: None. 6. RECERTIFICATION: This VHA Directive is due to be recertified on or before the last working day of April 2021. David J. Shulkin, M.D. Under Secretary for Health DISTRIBUTION: Emailed to the VHA Publication Distribution List on 5/3/2016. T-1 April 29, 2016 VHA DIRECTIVE 7702 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM 1. PURPOSE This Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Directive provides VHA policy for implementing the elements of the Industrial Hygiene (IH) program.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Compliance (Ec)
    LANL Waste Characterization, Reduction, and Repackaging Facility DOE ORR 7/21 OCCUPATIONAL AND INDUSTRIAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE PROGRAM (OSH) OBJECTIVE OSH.1: LANS has established and implemented Occupational and Industrial Safety and Hygiene (OISH) programs to ensure safe accomplishment of work at WCRR. Sufficient numbers of qualified personnel as well as adequate facilities and equipment are available to support WCRRF operations. (CRs 1, 4, 6, and 7) CRITERIA 1. The IH Program has conducted current and comprehensive exposure assessments. An adequate monitoring program is in place including equipment. (Exposure to radioactive contamination will be evaluated in the Radiological Protection Functional Area). (TSR; 10 CFR 851, CRD 18) 2. The Occupational Safety program has incorporated hazards and appropriate controls for the WCRR work activities such as ladder safety, electrical, Lockout/Tagout, hotwork, and vehicular safety. (TSR; 10 CFR 851) 3. Hoisting and rigging program complies with TSR requirements concerning spotters (TSR 5.6.10) and engineered lifts (5.10.3). Forklift management and operational procedures comply with TSR controls. (TSR; 10 CFR 851) 4. Adequate numbers of Industrial Hygiene and Occupational Safety professionals are assigned and perform effectively (work place surveillances, work package reviews, walk-down, etc). 5. Adequate facilities are available to ensure WCRRF operational support in the area of occupational and industrial safety. 6. The level of knowledge of occupational and industrial safety personnel concerning their roles and responsibilities for WCRR operations is adequate. (DOE O 440.1A, DOE O 5480.20A) APPROACH Requirement: • 10 CFR 851, Worker Safety and Health Program Document Review: • Review Contractor Management Self Assessment Report (MSA), and Contractor Operational Readiness Review (CORR) Report and corrective actions for all findings to determine if: – All Pre-Start Findings are resolved and the corrective actions are appropriate for the issue determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Microplastics Expert Workshop Report
    Microplastics Expert Workshop Report Trash Free Waters Dialogue Meeting Convened June 28-29, 2017 EPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds Primary Author: Margaret Murphy, AAAS S&TP Fellow Report Date: December 4, 2017 1 EPA Microplastics Expert Workshop Report Executive Summary Recent global efforts to better understand microplastics distribution and occurrence have detailed both the ubiquity of microplastics and the uncertainties surrounding their potential impacts. In light of this scientific uncertainty, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) convened a Microplastics Expert Workshop in June 2017 to identify and prioritize the scientific information needed to understand the risks posed by microplastics (broadly defined as plastic particles <5 mm in size in any one dimension (Arthur et al. 2009)) to human and ecological health in the United States. The workshop gave priority to gaining greater understanding of these risks, while recognizing that there are many research gaps needing to be addressed and scientific uncertainties existing around microplastics risk management (e.g., waste management/recycling/ circular economy principles, green chemistry approaches to developing alternatives to current-use plastics). The workshop participants adopted a risk assessment-based approach and addressed four major topics: 1) microplastics methods, including deficits and needs; 2) microplastics sources, transport and fate; and 3) the ecological and 4) human health risks of microplastics exposure. A framework document was developed prior to the workshop to guide discussion. During the workshop, the participants recommended adopting a conceptual model approach to illustrate the fate of microplastics from source to receptor. This approach is helpful in describing the various scientific uncertainties associated with answering the overarching questions of the ecological and human health risks of microplastics, the degree to which information is available for each, and the interconnections among these uncertainties.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental File: Occupational Exposure Assessment
    PEER REVIEW DRAFT - DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE United States Office of Chemical Safety and Environmental Protection Agency Pollution Prevention Draft Risk Evaluation for Carbon Tetrachloride Supplemental File: Occupational Exposure Assessment CASRN: 56-23-5 January 2020 PEER REVIEW DRAFT -DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE TABLE OF CONTENTS/ ABBREVIATIONS ....................................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................9 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................11 1.1 Overview .....................................................................................................................................11 1.2 Scope ...........................................................................................................................................11 1.3 General Approach and Methodology for Occupational Exposures ............................................17 Process Description and Worker Activities ........................................................................... 17 Number of Workers and Occupational Non-Users ................................................................ 17 Inhalation Exposure Assessment Approach and Methodology ............................................. 17 1.3.3.1 General Approach ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure Assessments: a How to Guide Dave Huizen, CIH Grand Valley State University Exposure Assessment: a How to Guide
    Exposure Assessments: A How to Guide Dave Huizen, CIH Grand Valley State University Exposure Assessment: A How to Guide Participant Take-Aways from this Presentation: Understand why qualitative exposure assessments should be used Describe AIHA’s Basic Workplace Characterization Explore Qualitative Assessment Tools Review AIHA’s new Exposure Assessment Checklist Tool Exposure Assessment: A How to Guide How do we traditionally define industrial hygiene exposure assessment? What do we think is done? Exposure Assessment: A How to Guide We often think exposure assessment is primarily quantitative measurement. Air sampling, noise measurements, etc. How good are quantitative measurements? Of 1.4 million samples from OSHA nearly 50% are non-detects 20% of the samples above are double the exposure limit1. Are we spending too many resources assessing exposure quantitatively? Exposure Assessment: A How to Guide How much time do you spend with qualitative assessment tools before moving to quantitative methods? Exposure Assessment: AIHA’s Basic Characterization of Workplace First Step in Exposure Assessment: Gather Information Goal: Collect Information on workplace, work force, agents, etc. Sources of Information SDSs Workers Walk-around Surveys Engineers Records – drawings, process, medical, employment, maintenance, monitoring Literature search OELs Exposure Assessment: AIHA’s Basic Characterization of Workplace Questions to Ask: What are the hazardous agents? In what quantities? What are the health effects? What are the
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Statistical Analysis of Occupational Exposure Data
    GUIDELINES FOR STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DATA FINAL by IT Environmental Programs, Inc. 11499 Chester Road Cincinnati, Ohio 45246-0100 and ICF Kaiser Incorporated 9300 Lee Highway Fairfax, Virginia 22031-1207 Contract No. 68-D2-0064 Work Assignment No. 006 for OFFICE OF POLLUTION PREVENTION AND TOXICS U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 401 M STREET, S.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 August 1994 DISCLAIMER This report was developed as an in-house working document and the procedures and methods presented are subject to change. Any policy issues discussed in the document have not been subjected to agency review and do not necessarily reflect official agency policy. Mention of trade names or products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use. i CONTENTS FIGURES.......................................................... v TABLES........................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENT................................................vii INTRODUCTION.................................................... 1 A. Types of Occupational Exposure Monitoring Data ...................... 1 B. Types of Occupational Exposure Assessments ........................ 2 C. Variability in Occupational Exposure Data ........................... 3 D. Organization of This Report .................................... 4 STEP 1: IDENTIFY USER NEEDS........................................ 9 STEP 2: COLLECT DATA............................................. 15 A. Obtaining Data From NIOSH ................................... 15
    [Show full text]