Beyond 1984: Undercover in America–Serpico to Abscam Robert Blecker New York Law School, [email protected]

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Beyond 1984: Undercover in America–Serpico to Abscam Robert Blecker New York Law School, Robert.Blecker@Nyls.Edu digitalcommons.nyls.edu Faculty Scholarship Articles & Chapters 1984 Beyond 1984: Undercover in America–Serpico to Abscam Robert Blecker New York Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/fac_articles_chapters Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation 28 N.Y.L. Sch. L. Rev. 823 (1983-1984) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at DigitalCommons@NYLS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles & Chapters by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@NYLS. BEYOND 1984: UNDERCOVER IN AMERICA- SERPICO TO ABSCAM ROBERT I. BLECKER PART ONE PROLOGUE ................................................. 824 SERPICO To ARCHER ........................................ 840 The Archer Trial-United States v. Sherman: Subjective versus Objective Entrapment-Judge Friendly and Federal Jurisdiction-United States v. Russell-Archer reversed-A Second Try-The New York State Archer Case-Hampton v. United States: The Government on Both Sides-Archer's Conviction Affirmed: The Technique Vindicated. ABsc m ................................................... 872 The Undercover Background-Guccione and Williams-The Coaching Incident-Meyers' Payoff-Kelly-Schwartz and Jannotti. TRIALS AND HEARINGS ...................................... 899 United States v. Jannotti: Due Process-Congressional Hearings-The Archer Stain-United States v. Meyers-United States v. Williams-A Linguistic Probe of Abscam-Jannotti on Appeal: Entrapment and Due Process-United States v. Kelly-Meyers affirmed-Kelly reversed-The Judicial Curtain. PART Two PREDICATE SUSPICION ....................................... 966 Threshold Requirements-Probable Cause-Illinois v. Gates. DOUBLE STANDARDS ......................................... 971 Opposition to-Necessity of-Public/Private Distinction. ENTRAPM ENT ............................................... 983 Subjective Entrapment Defended-Objective Entrapment. GARDEN PARTIES TAPED ..................................... 1002 JURISDICTION: A RIGHT To DETERmiNE ........................ 1003 Separation of Powers-Federalism-The Guarantee of a Republican Form of Government. GOVERNMENT'S JURISDICTION OvER PRIvATE Lwvs: 1984 AND BEYOND ................................................. 1018 NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW [Vol. 28 BEYOND 1984: UNDERCOVER IN AMERICA- SERPICO TO ABSCAM ROBERT I. BLECKER* But what is government itself but the greatest of all reflec- tions on human nature? If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither ex- ternal nor internal controls on government would be neces- sary. In framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next place oblige it to control itself. James Madison, The 51st Federalist PROLOGUE The Lord made it tempting: commanding Adam not to eat from the tree in the very center of the garden, and then creating Eve. The Serpent, "more subtle than any other wild Creature that the Lord God had made," approached Eve, an unsuspecting innocent, and questioned her willingness to disobey their Sovereign's command. Deterred by the prospect of punishment, Eve showed no predisposition to crime. Thereupon the Sovereign's snake promised enormous gains from crimi- nal violation: "Gdd knows that when you eat of it your eyes will be opened, and you will be like God, knowing good and evil." * Associate Professor, New York Law School; B.A. 1969, Tufts University; J.D. 1974, Harvard Law School; Special Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Special Prosecutor, New York State 1974-1975. Acknowledgements Several participants in the events described, most notably Robert Leuci, shared their perspectives. Professor William L. Bruce, Justice Ernst H. Rosenberger, and Pro- fessor Marcia Zaroff offered helpful insight and suggestions. This account also benefited from the efforts of the staff of the New York Law School Law Review, especially Mitch- ell G. Williams, who not only criticized earlier drafts but helped structure this article from a larger whole, and Jonathan M. Soroko, a very helpful antagonist who also spent countless hours verifying accuracy. All of them disagreed with some of my conclusions. I believe that "s/he"--a neuter pronoun-is better than "he" in all appropriate con- texts, but have been persuaded that its use would distract the reader. Under protest, therefore, public officials and citizens are referred to as "he." Someday soon, perhaps, an expanded consciousness of sexual equality will offer us a smooth, neutral grammar, which will render this essay a stylistic anachronism. Also, I hope that someday a chang- ing ethic in government will render this essay and the undercover techniques it discusses similarly out of date. 1. THE FEDERALIST No. 51, at 322 (J. Madison) (C. Rossiter ed. 1961). 19841 BEYOND 1984: UNDERCOVER IN AMERICA Eve yielded to the inducement, "took of the fruit and ate; and she also gave some to her husband and he ate." But of course the garden was wired. The all-monitoring Sovereign soon confronted the transgressors: "Have you eaten of the tree of which I commanded you not to eat?" Unheroic, Adam instantly coop- erated-implicating his supplier, sacrificing his wife, and raising a de- fense of sorts: "The woman who Thou gavest to be with me, she gave me fruit of the tree, and I ate." God asked Eve, "What is this that you have done?" and Eve, too, took the route of confession and avoidance. Her response became a classic legal defense of entrapment: "The Serpent beguiled me, and I did eat." The entrapment defense failed here. Eve was condemned to pain in childbirth, Adam to toil the fields, and both to die. By also punish- ing the Serpent, God perhaps disavowed responsibility for the induce- ment. Or perhaps the entrapment defense failed because Adam and Eve had freely chosen to disobey. Whatever the reason, there remains an ambiguous moral residue in our mortality. The Garden story also leaves us queasy because the crime that oc- casioned our expulsion and certain death was non-violent, consensual, unlike robbery or murder, where the victim (or family or friends) will ordinarily protest their loss, so that the Sovereign may apprehend and punish those responsible. But whom did Adam and Eve hurt? Did it warrant such punishment? Their crime was victinless: they merely possessed forbidden fruit. The purchase, sale, and consumption of con- traband, forbidden consensual pleasures, leave no complainants. No one involved wants an investigation; detection is difficult. It may be necessary to monitor the garden and send in the snake. We were expelled from our garden into a jungle, where the greedy grasp for more ways to satisfy their desires, which multiply without limit. On occasion, we are moved to act for a stranger's benefit, and sometimes in nobler moments we care to do what is abstractly right, but by and large, as individuals, we the people are selfishly driven to gratify our desires. Perhaps the greatest of all desires is the desire for power. In 1787 and 1788, when the people of the United States believed themselves the first in history to deliberate freely on their constitutional plan, fear of a lust for total power permeated their debates: The pleasure of controul is palatable to all mankind without a single exception from the cradle to the throne. Let our peculiar situations be what- they may, our proportion of happiness great, our domestic circles pleasing, our love of money un- bounded .... still we are ready to risque the sacrifice of them NEW YORK LAW SCHOOL LAW REVIEW [VCol. 28 all for a share in the exercise of power over our fellow creatures . 2 "History exhibits this melancholy truth" said Centinel during the founding of our republic, "that lust of dominion that is inherent in every mind, in a greater or less degree."3 Widely understood by Ameri- cans of all persuasions who designed, discussed, and ratified the Con- stitution, was that "when possessed of power [any governor] will be constantly struggling for more, disturbing the government, and en- '4 croaching on the rights of others." The American founders were not the first to realize that human nature impelled the powerful to increase their power. Aristotle, a fer- vent advocate of limited constitutional government, portrayed the hor- ror of all-pervasive totalitarianism, describing tyranny's "administra- tive principle," for eliminating independence and self confidence, two things which a tyrant must guard against ... Generally ensure that people do not get to know each other well, for that establishes mutual confi- dence. Another piece of traditional advice to a tyrant tells him to keep the city dweller always within his view. Their ac- tivities then will not be kept secret and by constantly perform- ing servile obligation they will become used to having no minds of their own. Similarly a tyrant should endeavor to keep himself aware of everything that is said or done among his sub- jects; he should have spies [at] any place where there [is] a meeting or gathering of people.5 2. Ti*E CompLE-m ANT-FEDERALIST 30 (John De Witt) (H. Storing ed. 1981) [herein- after cited as THE ANTI-FEDERALIST]. The Complete Anti-Federalistis an exhaustive col- lection and analysis of letters and essays written in 1787-88 by those who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. According to Herbert Storing, the editor, although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists were divided among themselves, they were, at a deeper level, united with one another. Their disagreements were not based on different premises about the nature of man or the ends of political life. They were not the deep cleavages of contending regimes. They were much less sharp and clear-cut differences ... of men agreed that the purpose of government is the regulation and thereby the protection of individual rights and that the best instrument for this purpose is some form of limited, republican govern- ment .... The nation was born in consensus but it lives in controversy, and the main lines of that controversy are well-worn paths leading back to the founding debate.
Recommended publications
  • Bad Cops: a Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers
    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers Author(s): James J. Fyfe ; Robert Kane Document No.: 215795 Date Received: September 2006 Award Number: 96-IJ-CX-0053 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. Bad Cops: A Study of Career-Ending Misconduct Among New York City Police Officers James J. Fyfe John Jay College of Criminal Justice and New York City Police Department Robert Kane American University Final Version Submitted to the United States Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice February 2005 This project was supported by Grant No. 1996-IJ-CX-0053 awarded by the National Institute of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Points of views in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Police Commissioner's Report
    THE POLICE COMMISSIONER’S REPORT JANUARY 2016 THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT 22 40 58 INFORMATION HOUSING BUREAU RISK MANAGEMENT TECHNOLOGY BUREAU BUREAU TABLE OF CONTENTS 26 42 60 DETECTIVE BUREAU VIOLENCE- PERSONNEL REDUCTION TASK BUREAU / STAFFING FORCES 44 ORGANIZED CRIME 62 28 CONTROL BUREAU PERSONNEL COLLABORATIVE BUREAU / REFORM 4 POLICING 46 AND RECRUITMENT TRANSPORTATION LETTER FROM 30 BUREAU 64 THE MAYOR CRITICAL RESPONSE CIVILIAN MEMBERS 6 COMMAND 48 FIELD INTELLIGENCE 66 LETTER FROM 32 OFFICERS THE POLICE FACILITIES COMMISSIONER STRATEGIC RESPONSE GROUP 50 68 10 GRAND LARCENY 34 DIVISION CARS & EQUIPMENT NEIGHBORHOOD POLICING PLAN COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BUREAU / YOUTH PROGRAMS 52 70 14 ADMINISTRATION STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS COMPSTAT 36 COMMUNITY 54 AFFAIRS BUREAU / 72 16 SCHOOL SAFETY USE-OF-FORCE DIVISION POLICY 2014 / 2015 STATISTICAL TRAINING BUREAU ROUNDUP 20 38 56 76 TRANSIT BUREAU DISCIPLINE COMMUNITY NYPD HISTORICAL PARTNER PROGRAM TIMELINE SPRING 3100 ISSN #0038 8572 is published bimonthly by the New York City Police Department, One Police Plaza, New York, 10038. Periodicals postage paid at New York City, NY. “Ride-Along Enclosed” Postmaster: Send address changes to SPRING 3100 c/o New York City Police Department, One Police Plaza, New York, 10038. SPRING 3100 ©2014 BY NYPD. All rights reserved; No part of this publication may be reproduced without written consent of the Editor. L E T T ER FROM MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO appointed Bill Bratton to be New York City Police Department’s technological infrastructure; new use-of-force ICommissioner in January 2014, and, two years later, this policies and procedures; a more efficient and fairer internal report—about the sweeping changes in the NYPD— discipline system; 1,300 new officers; new technological underscores my reasons for doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pawnbroker 1964, USA, B&W, Drama, Running Time: 116 Mins
    The Pawnbroker 1964, USA, B&W, Drama, Running time: 116 mins. Second film in Directed by Sidney Lumet. Cast: Rod Steiger, Geraldine our Sidney Fitzgerald, Brock Peters Lumet Rod Steiger is usually seen these days as an actor who Season specialised in offbeat, volatile and crazed characters resulting Tuesday 17th in a reputation for hamminess, probably deserved if you look only at his film output from the early 1970’s onwards. October at 8.00pm However, if we look back to the 60’s, with the right film role and with the right director it is impossible to deny that he was a ‘Method’ actor of immense power and skill. And the Film essay by performance that kicked off this golden period is one of his Mark very best in Sidney Lumet’s still powerful The Pawnbroker. MacLennan Steiger was certain that he would be awarded the Best Actor (InFiFa) Oscar for his performance (he began to button up his jacket Film Notes in anticipation of leaving his seat) and was shocked when the compiled by name ‘Lee Marvin’ was announced as the winner for his roles Mark in the film Cat Ballou. Steiger’s Oscar came soon after for his MacLennan fine turn as the bigoted sheriff in the celebrated The Heat of (InFiFa) the Night, in which he starred with Sidney Poitier (who considered Steiger and Spencer Tracy the finest actors he worked with). In 1995 Poitier remarked on Steiger: ‘He's so good he made me dig into bags I never knew I had." In 2008, The Pawnbroker was Thirdly the film was controversial for some selected for preservation in the United adult scenes; (that were originally rejected by the Motion Picture Association of States National Film Registry by the Library of Congress as being America but the scenese were eventually "culturally, historically, or aesthetically allowed to stay in); to say more is too much, significant", and it is indeed an but remember that this film was made in important film for a variety of reasons, 1964.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript Sidney Lumet
    TRANSCRIPT A PINEWOOD DIALOGUE WITH SIDNEY LUMET Sidney Lumet’s critically acclaimed 2007 film Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead, a dark family comedy and crime drama, was the latest triumph in a remarkable career as a film director that began 50 years earlier with 12 Angry Men and includes such classics as Serpico, Dog Day Afternoon, and Network. This tribute evening included remarks by the three stars of Before the Devil Knows Your Dead, Ethan Hawke, Marissa Tomei, and Philip Seymour Hoffman, and a lively conversation with Lumet about his many collaborations with great actors and his approach to filmmaking. A Pinewood Dialogue with Sidney Lumet shooting, “I feel that there’s another film crew on moderated by Chief Curator David Schwartz the other side of town with the same script and a (October 25, 2007): different cast, and we’re trying to beat them.” (Laughter) “You know, trying to wrap the movie DAVID SCHWARTZ: (Applause) Thank you, and ahead of them. It’s like a race.” I remember welcome, everybody. Sidney Lumet, as I think all saying that “you know if this movie works, then of you know, has received a number of salutes I’m going to have to rethink my whole idea of and awards over the years that could be process, because I can not imagine that this will considered lifetime achievement awards—which work!” (Laughter) I’ve never seen such a might sometimes imply that they’re at the end of deliberate—I’m going to steal your words, Phil, their career. But that’s certainly far from the case, but—a focus of energy, and use of energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Necessary and Proper
    PROJECT ON GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT Necessary and Proper: Best Practices for Congressional Investigations June 7, 2017 Project On Government Oversight 1100 G St. NW Suite 500 Washington, DC 20005 (202) 347-1122 [ www.pogo.org Project On Government Oversight Necessary and Proper: Practices for Congressional Investigations June 7, 2017 1100 G Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005 (202) 347-1122 • www.pogo.org POGO is a 501(c)(3) organization "In my opinion, the power of investigation is one of the most important powers of the Congress.... The manner in which that power is exercised willlargely determine the position and prestige of the Congress in the future. " -HarryS. Truman, 1944 Contents INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW OF THE TYPES OF INDEPENDENT FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS ............... 3 Special Counsels and Independent Counsels .............................................................................. 3 Investigative Commissions ......................................................................................................... 5 Independence from the Executive Branch? ................................................................................. 6 Congressional Investigative Committees .................................................................................... 6 BEST PRACTICES FOR CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEES ................... 8 True Bipartisanship....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Money Laundering: an Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law
    Money Laundering: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law Charles Doyle Senior Specialist in American Public Law November 30, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RL33315 Money Laundering: An Overview of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 and Related Federal Criminal Law Summary This report provides an overview of the elements of federal criminal money laundering statutes and the sanctions imposed for their violation. The most prominent is 18 U.S.C. § 1956. Section 1956 outlaws four kinds of money laundering—promotional, concealment, structuring, and tax evasion laundering of the proceeds generated by designated federal, state, and foreign underlying crimes (predicate offenses)—committed or attempted under one or more of three jurisdictional conditions (i.e., laundering involving certain financial transactions, laundering involving international transfers, and stings). Its companion, 18 U.S.C. § 1957, prohibits depositing or spending more than $10,000 of the proceeds from a predicate offense. Section 1956 violations are punishable by imprisonment for not more than 20 years. Section 1957 carries a maximum penalty of imprisonment for 10 years. Property involved in either case is subject to confiscation. Misconduct that implicates either offense may implicate other federal criminal statutes as well. Federal racketeer influenced and corrupt organization (RICO) provisions outlaw acquiring or conducting the affairs of an enterprise (whose activities affect interstate or foreign commerce) through the patterned commission of a series of underlying federal or state crimes. RICO violations are also 20-year felonies. The Section 1956 predicate offense list automatically includes every RICO predicate offense, including each “federal crime of terrorism.” A second related statute, the Travel Act (18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2012 Christopher Hayes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    2012 Christopher Hayes ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE HEART OF THE CITY: CIVIL RIGHTS, RESISTANCE AND POLICE REFORM IN NEW YORK CITY, 1945-1966 by CHRISTOPHER HAYES A Dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in History written under the direction of Dr. Mia Bay New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION THE HEART OF THE CITY: CIVIL RIGHTS, RESISTANCE AND POLICE REFORM IN NEW YORK CITY, 1945-1966 By CHRISTOPHER HAYES Dissertation Director: Dr. Mia Bay This dissertation uses New York City’s July 1964 rebellions in Central Harlem and Bedford-Stuyvesant to explore issues of civil rights, liberalism, policing and electoral politics in New York City between 1945 and 1966. The city’s rebellions, the first of the 1960s urban uprisings that would come to define the decade, had widespread repercussions and shaped political campaigns at the local, state and national levels. Looking both backward and forward from the rebellions, I examine the causes many observers gave for the rebellions as well as what outcomes the uprisings had. Using archival records, government documents, newspapers and correspondence between activists and city officials, I look at the social and economic conditions in which black New Yorkers lived during the postwar period, the various ways in which black citizens and their white allies tried to remedy pervasive segregation and its deleterious effects, and the results of those attempts at reform. In providing a previously unavailable narrative of the nearly weeklong July rebellions, I show the ways in which the city’s black citizens expressed their frustrations with city officials, the police and local black ii leaders and how each group responded.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law As King and the King As Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? Eric M
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 1992 The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? Eric M. Freedman Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Eric M. Freedman, The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment?, 20 Hastings Const. L.Q. 7 (1992) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/449 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Law as King and the King as Law: Is a President Immune from Criminal Prosecution Before Impeachment? By ERIC M. FREEDMAN* Table of Contents Introduction ................................................... 8 I. The Original Intents ................................. 15 II. The Historical Practice ............................... 22 A. The Federal Executive Branch ......................... 22 B. The Federal Judicial and Legislative Branches .......... 24 1. The Federal Judicial Branch ....................... 25 2. The Federal Legislative Branch ..................... 30 C. Federal Prosecution of State and Local Officials ......... 33 D. State-Level Practice ................................... 37 III. Theoretical Considerations ........................... 39 A. The Dual Nature of the Impeachment Clause .......... 41 B. The Rule of Law ...................................... 46 1. Civil Immunity .................................... 46 * Assistant Professor of Law, Hofstra University School of Law. J.D. 1979, B.A.
    [Show full text]
  • White Collar Crime
    WHITE COLLAR CRIME Robert J. Anello* & Miriam L. Glaser** INTRODUCTION A mention of New York City, the seat of the Second Circuit, invariably evokes thoughts of finance. The home of Wall Street and the World Trade Center, Manhattan is also home to many of the country’s major banks, hedge funds, and stock exchanges; the Securities & Exchange Commission has a branch office in New York, as do the Federal Reserve Bank, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Even the Court of International Trade is located in Manhattan. Unsurprisingly then, New York City has also played host to some of the most important white collar criminal prosecutions in the nation. As the federal appellate court with jurisdiction over this financial center, the Second Circuit has ruled on many critical issues related to white collar crime. Distinctive in its understanding of business practice, its readiness to identify and oppose legislative encroachment into the realm of the judiciary, and in the high value it places upon legal history and stare decisis, the Second Circuit’s sophisticated jurisprudence has influenced courts nationwide. This Article will address six different areas of white collar law and procedure: (1) fraud, (2) the Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), (3) conspiracy, (4) public corruption, (5) white collar practice, and (6) sentencing. Many of the cases profiled in this Article have driven legal and cultural developments far beyond the federal courts, including the cases of Leona Helmsley, one of New York’s most prominent real estate moguls; the “Mafia Commission,” a take-down of the bosses of the Five Families of La Cosa Nostra; and Abscam, a massive sting operation created by the federal government to expose corrupt officials.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dangerous Breadth of the Hobbs Act and Other Corruption Statutes, The, 87 Notre Dame L
    Notre Dame Law Review Volume 87 | Issue 1 Article 8 11-1-2011 Hobbs Leviathan: The aD ngerous Breadth of the Hobbs Act and Other Corruption Statutes, The John S. Gawey Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr Recommended Citation John S. Gawey, Hobbs Leviathan: The Dangerous Breadth of the Hobbs Act and Other Corruption Statutes, The, 87 Notre Dame L. Rev. 383 (2013). Available at: http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol87/iss1/8 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by NDLScholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Notre Dame Law Review by an authorized administrator of NDLScholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES THE HOBBS LEVIATHAN: THE DANGEROUS BREADTH OF THE HOBBS ACT AND OTHER CORRUPTION STATUTES John S. Gawey* "[T]he more corrupt the State, the greater the number of its laws."' BACKGROUND On March 2, 1942 the Supreme Court infamously upheld the Sec- ond Circuit's reversals of extortion convictions for the Local 807 branch of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters in United States v. Local 807 InternationalBrotherhood of Teamsters.2 For years, Local 807 routinely stopped out-of-state non-union trucks carrying large quanti- ties of merchandise as they entered New York City and demanded, sometimes violently,3 that the drivers pay regular union-fees and per- * Candidate for Juris Doctor, Notre Dame Law School, 2012; B.A., Letters, University of Oklahoma, 2009. Many thanks to Professor G. Robert Blakey for his advice and encouragement during the planning stages of this Note, the staff of the Notre Dame Law Review for their work during the editing process, and finally to my parents Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • If You Have Issues Viewing Or Accessing This File, Please Contact Us at NCJRS.Gov
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file, please contact us at NCJRS.gov. • .f .' DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SPECIAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION THE USE OF STATE REGULATORY ACTION AGAINST CRlIviIN.AL INFILTRATION OF LEGITIMATE BUSINESS Stephen H. Keutz~r Chief Counsel James A. Sanderson Assistant Attornei G~~eral Clark E. !>1ears Chief Investigator o I' . l NCJR5 1 f~UL i 11978 , ACQUnSlTION5 \ THE USE OF STATE REGULATORY ACTION AGAINST ORGANIZED CRIME I. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this'paper i~ to briefly outline the potential resources available to law enforcement authorities in dealing with organized criminal activity through the use of state regulatory power. The suggestions contained here are certainly not entirely original nor are they offered as a panacea to the problems presented by organized criminal activity. It is suggested, however, that these steps could contribute significantly to the prevention and control of organized crime when used in conjuction with the other more conventional methods of combatting organized criminal activity. It has become increasingly evident that organized criminal interests have accelerated their infiltration of legitimate business enterprises in the United States. A variety of factors are responsible for this development. Probably foremost among these is the desire to hide or wash income from gambling, narcotics, prostitution and other illegal criminal activities and to provide those revenues with a guise of legitimacy for tax and other purposes. The veneer of legitimacy thus achieved permits organized crime to expand its influence on the social and economic life of our nation. An informative review of this increasing pro­ blem is contained in the criminal justice monograph entitled IIAn Analysis of Organized Crime's Infiltration of Legitimate Business ll authored by Gene C.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephen J. Cannell, 1941-2010
    STEPHEN J. CANNELL, 1941-2010 Stephen J(oseph) Cannell was born February 5, 1941 to Joseph Cannell, a Pasadena, California entrepreneur. Cannell struggled through his early school years, flunking three different grades of elementary, junior or senior high school, and regularly failing his English classes. Years later, when having one of his own children tested for dyslexia, he discovered that he had suffered from it his entire life. Never the less, he had a passionate love for writing, despite his difficulties with the written word, and set a goal for himself to become a best-selling author. After attending the University of Oregon on a football scholarship and meeting creative writing teachers that bolstered his confidence, Cannell married his high school sweetheart and went to work for his family’s business – driving a furniture truck all day. In the evenings, he set a rigorous writing schedule for himself – writing 5 hours a day, 7 days a week, on spec. He decided that his target market would be the burgeoning television scene, and after 6 years without a sale, he finally sold a script – to the series Ironside. After a few more sales, he caught the eye of the legendary writer/producer Jack Webb, who first hired him to be story editor and ultimately head writer for Adam-12. Cannell was contracted to Universal Television, writing and producing shows for that studio during the early-to-mid 1970s. While there, he produced Chase and wrote for and produced Toma, about real-life New York City detective David Toma. While producing Toma, Cannell and his mentor Roy Huggins (creator of Maverick, and many other tv series) wrote an episode that ended up getting rewritten to serve as a pilot for a series about an unorthodox Southern California P.I.
    [Show full text]