With Or Without Class: a Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

With Or Without Class: a Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S University of Denver Digital Commons @ DU Electronic Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 1-1-2016 With or Without Class: A Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S. and South Korea Minsun Ji University of Denver Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd Part of the International and Area Studies Commons, and the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Ji, Minsun, "With or Without Class: A Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S. and South Korea" (2016). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 1230. https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1230 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. With or Without Class: A Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S. and South Korea ____________ A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver ____________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy ____________ by Minsun Ji November 2016 Advisor: Dr. George DeMartino Author: Minsun Ji Title: With or Without Class: A Comparative Study of Union-Worker Cooperative Relations in the U.S. and South Korea Advisor: Dr. George DeMartino Degree Date: November 2016 ABSTRACT This dissertation examines to what extent union-cooperative partnerships in the U.S. and S. Korea might revitalize labor movements and to what extent class-based narratives (or their absence) shape labor movements. Exploring competing labor ontologies, the dissertation analyzes how variants of traditional Marxism and poststructural thinking shape labor campaigns. Through a historical review of union and worker coop activism, and modern case studies of union-coop partnerships among taxi drivers and bus drivers, the dissertation analyzes the consequences of organizing “with” and “without” class narratives. These labor histories and case studies lend support to the poststructural claim that class identity is constructed and contingent, varying by political-cultural context. However, these case studies undermine the poststructural critique that traditional notions of “class” are unimaginative and disempowering of diverse organizing projects that do not speak of “class.” Countering such arguments, this dissertation provides evidence that in labor organizing, class narratives remain powerful and necessary. Without talk of class in Denver, unionized cooperative taxi drivers constricted their field of action to maximizing individual economic gains through business ownership. The results of their activism were therefore limited. In these efforts, talk of class remains a generative force, capable of uniting workers, challenging regimes, and crafting alternative economies. Class narratives remain a necessary component in the conceptual toolbox of those committed to transformation in their community. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My earliest intellectual and civic inspirations trace to my colleagues during my Korean college days, who I am honored to have worked beside during the Korean student-labor movement of the early 1990s. I continue even now to draw support and inspiration from the lifetime friendships built in those efforts. Thank you, my friends. In Denver, I have been inspired by the immigrant low-wage workers of El Centro Humanitario, who taught me resilience, courage, and commitment to a cause, no matter the obstacles. In completing this dissertation, many taxi and bus drivers, union and coop leaders, and labor activists, both in Korea and the U.S., generously gave their time and insights. Thank you all. For providing me a model of intellectuals with deep and important civic commitments, I thank my dissertation committee members: George DeMartino, Aaron Schneider, and Karin Wedig. In particular, I acknowledge the inspiration of George DeMartino. No professor has ever understood, challenged, or mentored me with the clarity of purpose or care for my growth as George has. I have grown profoundly as a scholar and person due to his mentorship, and I owe this dissertation to his guidance. No words can express my thanks for the support of family during this process. To my departed father, I hope this dissertation would have made you proud. To my mother, brothers, and daughters (Donalyn and Sora), thank you for being patient, loving and supportive. To my husband, Tony, I am honored by your emotional and intellectual support through these long years. I dedicate this work to the inspiration you have provided me in your own tireless work to reach beyond the academy and to bridge theory with practical commitments to improving the real world. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Introduction 1 Global Neoliberalism and Labor in Crisis 1 Union-Coop Relationships: From Indifference to Common Ground 4 With or Without Class? Differing Approaches to Labor Organizing 7 Theorizing Labor Empowerment: Ontology Matters 11 Different Worlds of Labor Activism: the U.S. and South Korea 19 Class Matters: Preview of the Argument 21 Plan of the Dissertation 26 Chapter 2. Methodology 32 Addressing Bias and Presupposition: Multiple-Method Triangulation 34 Conclusion 40 Chapter 3. Traditional vs. Poststructural Marxism 41 Competing Ontologies: Economic Determinism vs. the Decentered Economy 45 Competing Ontologies: the Nature of “Class” 55 Traditional versus Poststructural Marxism: Practical Consequences of Ontological Orientations 71 Chapter 4. Traditional vs. Poststructural Marxism: Labor Unions, Worker Cooperatives, and the Labor Movement 77 Traditional Marxism on Worker Cooperatives 79 Traditional Marxism on Labor Unions 86 Poststructural Marxism on Worker Cooperatives 94 Poststructural Marxism on Labor Unions 101 Conclusion 104 Chapter 5. “There’s No Class in America”: Postructural U.S. Labor Movement 108 Job Consciousness and Business Unionism 112 The State and Business Unionism 125 Identity Politics and Pluralistic Labor Strategies 132 Conclusion 147 Chapter 6. From Radical to Business Cooperativism: Worker Cooperatives in the U.S. 150 Radical Roots: the Class-Conscious Cooperatives 151 State Action and the Rise of Business Cooperativism: The New Deal Legacy 158 iv Post-war Economic Gains and the Degeneration Thesis 164 ESOPS in the 1970s-1990s 172 Unions and Cooperatives Faces the New Economy: The USW-Mondragon Initative and New Era Windows 180 Conclusion 187 Chapter 7. A Case Study of Denver’s Taxi Driver Union-Coop Relations 189 The Harsh World of Taxi Workers 190 The Uber and Lyft Taxi Driver Solution: Cooperatives without Class Consciousness 193 Union Organizing of Denver’s SuperShuttle Transportation Workers 200 From Union to Worker Cooperative: New Direction in Taxi Driver Organizing 210 A Unionized Worker Cooperative in Practice 217 Conclusion 233 Chapter 8. South Korea’s Class Conscious Labor Movement 235 The Authoritarian State and Labor Antagonism 237 Consequences of State Institutions on Labor Organizing Patterns 251 Labor Movements before Democratization in 1987 255 Labor Movements after Democratization: KCTU and labor Militancy 266 Labor Militancy: Organizing Irregular Workers 275 Conclusion 282 Chapter 9. South Korea’s Worker Cooperative Movement 284 The First Stage of worker cooperative development: 1910-1950 286 The Second stage of worker cooperative Development: 1980s-1990s 290 The Third stage worker cooperative Development: 1997- Present 295 Relations between Third-stage Worker Cooperatives and Labor Unions 308 Conclusion 317 Chapter 10. Case Study of Woojin Bus Workers’ Union- Cooperative in South Korea 319 Privately Owned Korea Bus Companies and Worker Exploitation 322 Worker Takeover at Woojin Bus: The rise of a Worker-Cooperative Solution 328 The Analysis of Woojin: Strong Class Consciousness 329 A Growing Ecology of Bus Driver Cooperatives 347 Conclusion 350 Chapter 11. Conclusion 355 Beyond Class: The Post-structural Political Imagination 355 Organizing with Class: Practical Benefits of a Class-Conscious Approach 359 v Bibliography 368 Appendices 425 Appendix 1. Abbreviation 425 Appendix 2. Questionnaire: The Survey of Taxi Workers in Denver, U.S 427 Appendix 3. Survey Results: Denver’s Taxi Workers (U.S.) 429 Appendix 4. Questionnaire: Survey of Woojin Workers, Korea (in Korean) 432 Appendix 5. Questionnaire: Survey of Woojin Workers, Korea (in English) 434 Appendix 6. Survey Results: Woojin Workers (South Korea) 438 Appendix 7. List of Charts 441 vi CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Though the post-1970s era of global neoliberalism has seen a withering of labor power across the globe, recent years have witnessed a florescence of union-coop partnerships, including renewed thinking about how unions can use their resources to build the alternative kind of economy many worker cooperatives support, and of how worker coop owners can think politically and in solidarity with union workers in a struggle to humanize the broader economic system. As Hazel Corcoran, the Executive Director of the Canadian Worker Co-operative Federation, stated at a union-coop solidarity conference in 2011, both labor institutions believe in “economic democracy, wealth sharing and putting people before profits.” It is these shared values of union and coop activists that are increasingly moving the two institutions “from indifference to common ground” (Davidson,
Recommended publications
  • Cooperative Housing in the United States
    HOUSING COOPERATIVES UNITED STATES 1949-1950 Joint publication of Division of Housing Research Housing HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY Research Bureau of Labor Statistics UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WASHINGTON 1951 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Cooperative Housing in the United States 1949 and 1950 Housing Research Paper No. 24 Bulletin No. 1093 HOUSING AND HOME FINANCE AGENCY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Office of the Administrator Bureau of Labor Statistics Housing Research Division For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U . S. Government Printing: Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price 65 cents (paper) Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis P r e f a c e After the end of World W ar II the severe housing shortage in this country led to an increased interest in cooperative housing as one means of solving the problem. This gave further impetus to a movement which began in the United States about a third of a century ago among people who held that by joining together in the purchase of land and the construction of houses they could obtain dwellings of good quality at less cost than those being provided in other ways. As things have worked out, some housing cooperatives have been outstandingly successful and have accomplished everything their sponsors hoped for. Others, however, have proved to be disap­ pointing, either falling by the wayside or failing to attain the original objectives.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do We Really Know About Worker Co-Operatives?
    What do we really know about worker co-operatives? Virginie Pérotin Icon or graphic 2 What do we really know about Worker Co-operatives? Virginie Pérotin is Professor of Economics at Leeds University Business School and specialises in the effects of firm ownership and governance on performance, worker co-operatives, employee ownership and profit sharing. Previous academic and research roles include positions at the International Labour Office, the London School of Economics and the Centre d’Etude des Revenus et des Coûts (CERC) in the French Prime Minister’s Office in Paris. Professor Pérotin has also acted as a consultant to the European Commission, World Bank and OECD on issues of profit-sharing, employee ownership and employee involvement schemes. Executive summary The idea that employees can run their own firms might sound unrealistic to some. This study looks at international data on worker-owned and run businesses in Europe, the US and Latin America and compares them with conventional businesses. It also reviews international statistical studies on the firms’ productivity, survival, investment and responsiveness. It finds that worker co-operatives represent a serious business alternative and bring significant benefits to their employees and to the economy. There are thousands of worker-run businesses in Europe, employing several hundred thousand people in a broad range of industries, from traditional manufacturing to the creative and high-tech industries. Because worker co-operatives are owned and run by them, employees in worker-owned co-operatives have far more say in the business, from day-to-day concerns through to major strategic issues. The largest study comparing the productivity of worker co-operatives with that of conventional businesses finds that in several industries, conventional companies would produce more with their current levels of employment and capital if they behaved like employee-owned firms.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperatives in Industrial and Service Sectors in the Asia-Pacific Region
    Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Models, work and employment, ecosystem and public policies International Cooperative Alliance Asia and Pacific & 9, Aradhana Enclave +91-11-26888067 ica-asia and pacific Sector-13, R. K. Puram International Organisation of the Industrial and Service Cooperatives New Delhi-110066 +91-11-26888250 icaapac [email protected] icaasiapacific ica-ap.coop Cooperatives in industrial and service sectors in the Asia-Pacific region Table of contents List of tables iv List of figures ������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ iv Abbreviations and acronyms ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� v Synthesis note 1 Introduction���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1 2 The scope of target types of the present study ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 1 3 Method����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 2 ‘Type’ and ‘model’�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Growth Ecosystem
    BUILDING the Report 1 Report 2 Report 3 INCLUSIVE Broad-Based Cooperative Growth Strategies for Financing ECONOMY Ownership Models Ecosystems the New Economy THE COOPERATIVE GROWTH ECOSYSTEM Inclusive Economic Development in Action A joint project of Project Equity and the Democracy at Work Institute Melissa Hoover & Hilary Abell, Lead Authors project Building the Inclusive Economy series: Through three groundbreaking reports funded by Citi Community Development, Building the Inclusive Economy series sets out new, cutting-edge economic development models for city leaders and community development practitioners interested in embedding equity, community wealth, and sustainability into their local economic growth plan. This series, authored by The Democracy Collaborative, The Democracy at Work Institute, and Project Equity, lays out key tools and building blocks for equitable local economic growth where all residents are able to maximize opportunities, thereby expanding urban economies where all can meaningfully participate and benefit. To learn more about the series, visit www.CitiCommunityDevelopment.com. The Cooperative Growth Ecosystem Project: This paper is the fruit of a year-long project carried out by the Democracy at Work Institute and Project Equity in 2014 and 2015. Hilary Abell and Alison Lingane of Project Equity, Melissa Hoover and Tim Palmer of the Democracy at Work Institute, and consultant Tim Lohrentz comprised the team that developed the Cooperative Growth Ecosystem framework; piloted it as an analytical and strategy tool looking at five regions around the country; hosted a national convening, in coordination with Citi Community Development, to get feedback and provide space for regions to develop actions plans; and developed this paper to share with the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Cooperative Farming Greenhorns Guidebook
    Cooperative Farming Frameworks for Farming Together a greenhorns guidebook by Faith Gilbert Contributing Authors: Kathy Ruhf, Land for Good • Lynda Brushett, Cooperative Development Institute This guidebook was funded by a Northeast SArE Sustainable Community innovations grant. Additional thanks to: Severine vT Fleming, the Greenhorns Jon Jaffe, Farm Credit East Jerry Cosgrove, New World Foundation Local Economies Project Joe Rhinehart, Democracy at Work Network Betsy Black, Cooperative Fund of New England Steve Hadcock, Cornell Cooperative Extension And to our featured farms and organizations: Corbin Hill Food Project Diggers’ Mirth Collective Farm, VT Little City Growers, RI Intervale Center, VT Island Grown Apprentice Program NOFA Massachusetts Southern Exposure Seed Exchange, VA Sleeping Frog Farm, AZ Tourne-Sol Co-operative Farm, QC Tweefontein Herb Farm, NY Winter Green Farm, OR And to the many individuals who shared their cooperative farming experiences with us. Illustrations by Brooke Budner • Design by Kimberly Boustead contents INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 4 Author’s Note ......................................................................................................4 What is a cooperative? What is cooperative farming? .....................................5 The Cooperative Farming Landscape...............................................................6 CHAPTER 1: Sharing Resources and Services .............7 Marketing & Distribution ...................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Workers in Management
    Review of Radical Political Economics 43(3) 328 –333 The Role of Workers © 2011 Union for Radical Political Economics Reprints and permission: http://www. in Management: The sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0486613411407715 Case of Mondragón http://rrpe.sagepub.com Al Campbell1 Abstract Independent of whatever other advantages it might have for the workers, worker ownership has repeatedly demonstrated in the real world that it is no guarantee for worker participation in management. The participation of workers in management as a first step toward worker self-management requires institutions and practices that will both allow such participation and promote it. This paper considers, in the frame of four standard issues in worker self- management, six specific institutions and practices common to the collection of co-ops that constitute the Mondragón complex that have generated meaningful worker participation in management in this large corporation. JEL classification: J54, L29, M19 Keywords economic democracy, workers’ participation in management, Mondragón, cooperatives This is not a paper about the rich multi-dimensional subject of the economics of the Mondragón complex of worker cooperatives. This is a case study of worker participation in management and self-management at Mondragón, at the present time. Specifically, this article will briefly exam- ine six institutional structures and practices at Mondragón that both allow and promote worker participation in management. 1. Structures1 and Practices for Supporting and Promoting Participation in Management Before examining these six institutions and practices, four issues will be briefly indicated that should be kept in mind. The first issue is the necessary interaction between direct and representative institutions and practices for participation in management.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Immigrant Ethnic Politics? Organizational Innovation, Collaboration and Competition in the Los Angeles Immigrant Rights Movement (1980-2015) Gnes, D
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Beyond immigrant ethnic politics? Organizational innovation, collaboration and competition in the Los Angeles immigrant rights movement (1980-2015) Gnes, D. Publication date 2018 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Gnes, D. (2018). Beyond immigrant ethnic politics? Organizational innovation, collaboration and competition in the Los Angeles immigrant rights movement (1980-2015). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 CHAPTER 6.161 BEYOND THE LOS ANGELES MODEL? UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION OF IMMIGRANT WORKER ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH A HYBRID RESOURCE-BASED MODEL Abstract This paper offers a starting point to explain the emergence, consolidation, and fragmentation of the Los Angeles immigrant workers rights movement over the last three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The LILAC Project
    The LILAC Project Ecological Affordable Co-operative www.lilac.coop The Challenges • Climate change and oil dependency • Affordable AND low carbon, low energy housing • Community led response • Low impact living: design, technology, behaviour, citizenship • Need for policy ‘step change’ • Capacity building and self management • Replicability and growth The Three elements • LILAC = Low Impact Living Affordable Community • Low Impact Living 26% of C02 emissions in the UK come from our homes. The government has set a target of all new buildings to be carbon neutral by 2016. • Affordable We have chosen a Mutual model (Mutual Home Ownership Society) which ensures permanent affordability. • Community Our design will maximise community interaction. It is based on a Danish co-housing model which balances people’s needs for their own private space with shared facilities. About Lilac • Project entails 20 mixed size dwellings and a larger central common house all built from super-insulated natural materials. • Lilac is a fully mutual Co-operative Society registered with FSA. • It is member-led, not for profit • Land owned / managed by the Co-operative Society NOT individuals • Innovative Mutual Home Ownership Society = permanent affordability • All members are leaseholders NOT private owner occupiers • Commitments/restrictions outlined in lease document and Society policies (e.g. Car ownership, communal areas, pets, food etc!). Our values . Environmental sustainability .Diverse . Grass-roots .Self-reliance . Respect .Learning . Inclusive & Affordable
    [Show full text]
  • Constructive Anarchism.Pdf
    The arrival of a new anarchist group in Aotearoa has opened the way for discussion of the various modes of anarchist organisation, including their benefits and their pitfalls. It’s obvious that organisation on a larger scale is needed in order to link the various work done by anarchists in Aotearoa — I don’t think there is too much opposition to this fact. However, it is the form of that organisation that is being discussed at the time of writing, and rightly so. The purpose of this text is not to thoroughly evaluate the merits or flaws of labels such as ‘Platforfism’, ‘Neo-Platformism’, ‘Synthesis’ or other neatly prescribed specifics of organisation. That would be a lengthy text in itself! Instead, I’d like to talk about issues that cut across any kind of organised line or label — primarily, what projects or types of struggle could we undertake as anarchists (without adjectives?) in order to increase the acceptance of anarchist ideas and action, libertarian communism, and truly egalitarian modes of relations in Aotearoa — or more specifically, in our places of work and our communities. From this cohesion of projects, an organisation of anarchists and its specific form could take shape from the bottom up around a program of action collectively decided, discussed and defined. Here is the disclaimer: I am no veteran of anarchism in Aotearoa. My relative outsider status to past and present groups could be held against me, and that’s fine. It could also be a positive thing. Nor do I pretend to be the first or an expert on the practice of ideas I may describe throughout the text.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping: Key Figures National Report: United Kingdom Ica-Eu Partnership
    MAPPING: KEY FIGURES NATIONAL REPORT: UNITED KINGDOM ICA-EU PARTNERSHIP TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT ........................................................................... 2 i. Historical background ........................................................................................... 2 ii. Public national statistics ....................................................................................... 4 iii. Research methodology......................................................................................... 5 II. KEY FIGURES ......................................................................................................... 6 iv. ICA member data ................................................................................................. 7 v. General overview .................................................................................................. 7 vi. Sector overview .................................................................................................... 8 III. GRAPHS................................................................................................................. 11 vii. Number of cooperatives by type of cooperative: ............................................... 11 viii. Number of memberships by type of cooperative: .............................................. 12 ix. Number of employees by type of cooperative: .................................................. 13 x. Turnover by type of cooperative in EUR: ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For All the People
    Praise for For All the People John Curl has been around the block when it comes to knowing work- ers’ cooperatives. He has been a worker owner. He has argued theory and practice, inside the firms where his labor counts for something more than token control and within the determined, but still small uni- verse where labor rents capital, using it as it sees fit and profitable. So his book, For All the People: The Hidden History of Cooperation, Cooperative Movements, and Communalism in America, reached expectant hands, and an open mind when it arrived in Asheville, NC. Am I disappointed? No, not in the least. Curl blends the three strands of his historical narrative with aplomb, he has, after all, been researching, writing, revising, and editing the text for a spell. Further, I am certain he has been responding to editors and publishers asking this or that. He may have tired, but he did not give up, much inspired, I am certain, by the determination of the women and men he brings to life. Each of his subtitles could have been a book, and has been written about by authors with as many points of ideological view as their titles. Curl sticks pretty close to the narrative line written by worker own- ers, no matter if they came to work every day with a socialist, laborist, anti-Marxist grudge or not. Often in the past, as with today’s worker owners, their firm fails, a dream to manage capital kaput. Yet today, as yesterday, the democratic ideals of hundreds of worker owners support vibrantly profitable businesses.
    [Show full text]
  • NASCO Institute 2006 Program Guide.Pdf
    8:30am SMAC Track Registration Opens 9am SMAC Track Begins 12pm Institute Registration Opens lpm Detroit Tour Leaves 2-4pm SkiUshares & Tours Block 1 4-6pr:n Skillshares & Tours Block 2 ?pm NASCO Welcome 8pm Cooper~tive Hall of Fame 9pm-12am Documentary Film Festival · · 8am Registration Opens 8:30-10:30am Annual General Meeting Part 1 10:30am-12pm Course Block 1 12: lOpm-lpm Keynote Address lpm-2:30pm Lunch on the town (not covered by registration) 2 : 40pm -4 ~ 40pm Course Block 2 4:50pm-6:20pm Course Block 3 6:20pm-7:50pm Dinner Active Member Rep Candidate Speeches 8pm-9:10pm Caucus Block 1 9:20pm-10:30pm Caucus Block 2 llpm Spoken Word Performance 9:00am-12:00pm Annual General Meeting Part 2 10am-12pm Course Block 4 12pm-1:30pm . Lunch Diversity Congress NASCO Properties Family Reunion 1:40pm-3: lOpm Course Block 5 3:20pm-4:50pm Plenary Sessions 4:50pm-5:30pm Cider and Goodbyes ·Coffee Haus This year Institute will host its own unique coffee haus-a place where people can network, hang out with friends, hold informal caucuses and meetings, relax, browse the bookstores, drink coffee and tea--.-basically the physical epicenter of Institute. Open from early moring to late at night, this will be the place to take a break from the packed weekend and connect with other co-opers. Cooperative Hall of Fa·me The Hall of Fame gives NASCO co-ops a forum to recognize individuals who have shown an outstanding commitment to the cooperative movement through their hard work and tireless enthusiasm for cooperation.
    [Show full text]