DOCSLIB.ORG

1.3 Recent Board & Department of Labor Activity on Union Organizing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ABOUT THE AUTHORS Michael G. Pedhirney is a shareholder in the San Francisco office of Littler Mendelson, P.C., the largest U.S.-based law firm exclusively devoted to representing management in labor and employment law. Michael focuses on the representation of management in a broad range of labor and employment law matters, particularly collective bargaining and matters before the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). In addition to appearing in state and federal courts and before the NLRB, Michael also represents employers in collective bargaining and handles arbitrations and mediations. Karen A. Sundermier, in her current role as a Knowledge Management Counsel for Littler, helped design Littler LaborSmart™, an interactive, online tool that allows in-house legal and labor relations professionals to access all of their company’s collective bargaining agreements in a structured, searchable database. The tool allows companies to swiftly identify and compare language for contract administration, grievance, and negotiation purposes. Prior to turning her focus to offering strategic and innovative legal service solutions, Karen represented employers in a broad spectrum of employment and labor matters and assisted employers with representation elections and collective bargaining as a Littler associate and in- house employment counsel. She currently serves as an editor for Littler’s publications on labor relations topics. © 2018 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. i COVERAGE Scope of Discussion. This publication explains union election procedures and the NLRB’s role in overseeing elections. It also explores NLRB precedent on objectionable conduct by different parties that may result in election results being overturned. Also included is information concerning actions employers are permitted to take and are prohibited from taking in advance of and in response to union organizing drives. Although the major recent developments in federal employment and labor law are generally covered, this publication is not all-inclusive and the current status of any decision or principle of law should be verified by counsel. The focus of this publication is federal law. Although some state law distinctions may be included, the coverage is not comprehensive. To adhere to publication deadlines, developments and decisions subsequent to April 1, 2018 are generally not covered. Disclaimer. This publication is not a do-it-yourself guide to resolving employment disputes or handling employment litigation. Nonetheless, employers may find the information useful in understanding the issues raised and their legal context. This publication is not a substitute for experienced legal counsel and does not provide legal advice regarding any particular situation or employer or attempt to address the numerous factual issues that inevitably arise in any employment-related dispute. The materials in this publication are for informational purposes only, not for the purpose of establishing an attorney-client relationship. Use of and access to this publication does not create an attorney-client relationship between Littler Mendelson, P.C. and the user. © 2018 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. All material contained within this publication is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the express written consent of Littler Mendelson. © 2018 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS § 1 OVERVIEW OF UNIONS & THE ELECTION PROCESS ............................................................................................... 1 § 1.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 1 § 1.2 BRIEF HISTORY OF UNIONS ................................................................................................................ 1 § 1.2(a) National Labor Relations Act & National Labor Relations Board........................................... 1 § 1.2(b) Shifting Union Alliances .......................................................................................................... 2 § 1.2(c) Decline of Modern Unions: Union Membership & Election Statistics .................................... 3 § 1.2(d) Factors Contributing to the General Decline in Union Membership ....................................... 4 § 1.2(e) Labor Movement’s New Strategies .......................................................................................... 5 § 1.3 RECENT BOARD & DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ACTIVITY ON UNION ORGANIZING & ELECTIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 7 § 1.3(a) Union Representation Election Rule: Effective April 14, 2015, But Under Review by the Board .................................................................................................................................. 7 § 1.3(b) “Persuader” Rule: Enjoined June 27, 2016 & Under Consideration for Rescission ................ 8 § 1.4 ELECTION PROCEDURES ..................................................................................................................... 9 § 1.4(a) Petition ..................................................................................................................................... 9 § 1.4(b) Pre-Election Posting............................................................................................................... 10 § 1.4(c) Pre-Election Hearing .............................................................................................................. 10 § 1.4(c)(i) Employer Statement of Position ............................................................................... 11 § 1.4(c)(ii) Initial Employee List ................................................................................................ 11 § 1.4(c)(iii) Topics Covered During Pre-Election Hearing .......................................................... 11 § 1.4(c)(iv) Stipulated Election Agreement ................................................................................. 12 § 1.4(d) Direction of an Election ......................................................................................................... 12 § 1.4(e) Notices of Election ................................................................................................................. 12 § 1.4(f) Excelsior List Rule ................................................................................................................. 12 § 1.4(g) Voting & Ballots .................................................................................................................... 13 § 1.4(h) Language Problems ................................................................................................................ 14 § 1.4(i) Observers ............................................................................................................................... 14 § 1.4(j) Pre-Election Conference ........................................................................................................ 15 § 1.4(k) Challenges .............................................................................................................................. 15 § 1.4(l) Ballot Count ........................................................................................................................... 15 § 1.4(m) Objections to the Election ...................................................................................................... 15 § 1.4(n) Test of Certification ............................................................................................................... 16 § 1.5 ELIGIBILITY TO VOTE IN UNION ELECTION & APPROPRIATE BARGAINING UNIT .............................. 16 § 1.5(a) Eligibility to Vote .................................................................................................................. 16 § 1.5(a)(i) “Employees” v. “Supervisors” ................................................................................. 16 § 1.5(a)(ii) Nontraditional “Employee” Groups ......................................................................... 18 § 1.5(a)(iii) “Part-Time Employees” v. “Casual Employees” ...................................................... 19 § 1.5(a)(iv) Temporary Workers & Joint Employment ............................................................... 19 § 1.5(a)(v) Laid-Off Employees ................................................................................................. 21 § 1.5(a)(vi) Undocumented Workers ........................................................................................... 21 © 2018 LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. iii § 1.5(b) Appropriate Bargaining Unit ................................................................................................. 22 § 1.5(b)(i) Micro-Bargaining Units ............................................................................................ 23 § 1.6 OVERTURNING AN ELECTION BECAUSE OF OBJECTIONABLE CONDUCT BY AN EMPLOYER OR UNION ............................................................................................................................................ 24 § 1.6(a) Changes in Conditions of Employment & Promises by the Employer .................................. 25 § 1.6(b) General Shoe Doctrine: Laboratory Conditions Test ............................................................. 25 § 1.6(c) Misrepresentations ................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Union Security and the Right to Work Laws: Is Coexistence Possible?

    Union Security and the Right to Work Laws: Is Coexistence Possible?

    William & Mary Law Review Volume 2 (1959-1960) Issue 1 Article 3 October 1959 Union Security and the Right to Work Laws: Is Coexistence Possible? J. T. Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Repository Citation J. T. Cutler, Union Security and the Right to Work Laws: Is Coexistence Possible?, 2 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 16 (1959), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol2/iss1/3 Copyright c 1959 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr UNION SECURITY AND RIGHT-TO-WORK LAWS: IS CO-EXISTENCE POSSIBLE? J. T. CUTLER THE UNION STRUGGLE At the beginning of the 20th Century management was all powerful and with the decision in Adair v. United States1 it seemed as though Congress was helpless to regulate labor relations. The Supreme Court had held that the power to regulate commerce could not be applied to the labor field because of the conflict with fundamental rights secured by the Fifth Amendment. Moreover, an employer could require a person to agree not to join a union as a condition of his employment and any legislative interference with such an agreement would be an arbitrary and unjustifiable infringement of the liberty of contract. It was not until the first World War that the federal government successfully entered the field of industrial rela- tions with the creation by President Wilson of the War Labor Board. Upon being organized the Board adopted a policy for- bidding employer interference with the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively and employer discrimination against employees engaging in lawful union activities2 .
  • Governing Body 323Rd Session, Geneva, 12–27 March 2015 GB.323/INS/5/Appendix III

    Governing Body 323Rd Session, Geneva, 12–27 March 2015 GB.323/INS/5/Appendix III

    INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE Governing Body 323rd Session, Geneva, 12–27 March 2015 GB.323/INS/5/Appendix III Institutional Section INS Date: 13 March 2015 Original: English FIFTH ITEM ON THE AGENDA The Standards Initiative – Appendix III Background document for the Tripartite Meeting on the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), in relation to the right to strike and the modalities and practices of strike action at national level (revised) (Geneva, 23–25 February 2015) Contents Page Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 1 Decision on the fifth item on the agenda: The standards initiative: Follow-up to the 2012 ILC Committee on the Application of Standards .................. 1 Part I. ILO Convention No. 87 and the right to strike ..................................................................... 3 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 3 II. The Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) ......................................................................... 3 II.1. Negotiating history prior to the adoption of the Convention ........................... 3 II.2. Related developments after the adoption of the Convention ........................... 5 III. Supervision of obligations arising under or relating to Conventions ........................
  • Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism: an Interview with Charlie Post

    Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism: an Interview with Charlie Post

    Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism | 247 Rethinking Precarity and Capitalism: An Interview with Charlie Post Jordy Cummings1 (JC): The theme of this year’s Alternate Routes is the “paradox of low-wage, no-wage work”, and there is a great deal of analysis of an allegedly new historical subject, “the precariat”. What do you make of this “paradox”? Is capitalism really that different in 2015 than it was 20, 30, 40 years ago? Charlie Post2 (CP): Capitalism is certainly different today than it was during the so-called “Golden Age” of 1945-1975. During those years, “full-employment” – unemployment below the “frictional” rate of 3-4 percent, the dominance of full-time work with unemployment insurance, health care, pensions and the like (provided by the state, private employers, or some combination) – was the norm. This “full-employment” model also included some measure of job security – either legal or contractual protections from arbitrary dismissal, etc. The “Golden Age” was, in my opinion, exceptional in the history of capitalism. It was the product of a combination of a long period of rising profitability (1933-1966) and a militant labor movement across the industrialized world. Workers had threatened the foundations of capitalist rule (France and Spain in the mid-1930s, France and Italy immediately after World War II, France in 1968, Portugal 1974-1975) or severely disrupted capitalist accumulation in mass strike waves in the mid-1930s, immediate post-war years and again between 1965-1975. Capital was forced to make major concessions to labor. The “full-employment” model and the expansive welfare state were the most important gains, giving workers unprecedented security of employment.
  • National Master Ups Freight Agreement

    National Master Ups Freight Agreement

    NATIONAL MASTER UPS FREIGHT AGREEMENT For the Period: August 1, 2013 2018 through July 31, 2018 2023 covering: The parties reserve the right to correct inadvertent errors and omissions. Where no reference is made to a specific Article or Section thereof, such Article and Section are to continue as in the current Master Agreement, as applied and interpreted during the life of such Agreement. Additions and new language are bold and underlined. Language from the prior Master Agreement that is being deleted is struck through. UPS Freight, herein referred to as the “Employer” and/or employees who are not members of the Local Union and all “Company”, and the TEAMSTERS NATIONAL UPS FREIGHT employees who are hired hereafter, shall become and remain NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE, hereinafter referred to as members in good standing of the Local Union as a condition TNUPSFNC, representing Local Unions affiliated with the of employment on and after the thirty-first (31st) day following International Brotherhood of Teamsters. the beginning of their employment, or on and after the thirty- first (31st) day following the effective date of this subsection, or ARTICLE 1 the date of this Agreement, whichever is the later. An employee PARTIES TO THE AGREEMENT who has failed to acquire, or thereafter maintain, membership in the Union, as herein provided, shall be terminated seventy-two Section 3. Transfer of Company Title or Interest (72) hours after the Employer has received written notice from In the event the Company is sold or any part of its operations covered an authorized representative of the Local Union, certifying that by this Agreement is transferred, the Company shall give notice to the membership has been, and is continuing to be offered to such Local UnionTNUPSFNC to the extent required by applicable law.
  • Why Organize and Affiliate Others?

    Why Organize and Affiliate Others?

    Affiliate Organizing Committee Handbook Updated March, 2016 WHY ORGANIZE AND AFFILIATE OTHERS? ........................................................1 - 2 CSO CODE OF CONDUCT ...................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION TO CSO/NSO ...........................................................................4 BENEFITS OF CSO MEMBERSHIP AND LOCAL AFFILIATION .................................5 HOW MEMBERS PARTICIPATE IN CSO/NSO ........................................................6 - 7 ELIGIBILITY, DUES AND STANDARDS FOR AFFILIATION ....................................8 - 9 REPRESENTING A BRAND-NEW BARGAINING UNIT .......................................... 10 - 15 BARGAINING CSO AGREEMENTS .......................................................................16 ONCE THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN BARGAINED ...................................................17 APPENDIX A – AUTHORIZATION FORM ..............................................................19 APPENDIX B – RECOGNITION REQUEST ............................................................20 APPENDIX C – RECOGNITION AGREEMENT ........................................................21 APPENDIX D – NLRB RECOGNITION PETITION ...................................................22 APPENDIX E – CBC GOALS AND SETTLEMENT STANDARDS ........................23 - 31 CSO MEMBERSHIP FORM ..............................................................................33 1 CSO Affiliate Organizing Handbook Welcome to the California Staff Organization (CSO).
  • GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS

    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS

    GLOSSARY of COLLECTIVE BARGAINING TERMS and SELECTED LABOR TOPICS ABEYANCE – The placement of a pending grievance (or motion) by mutual agreement of the parties, outside the specified time limits until a later date when it may be taken up and processed. ACTION - Direct action occurs when any group of union members engage in an action, such as a protest, that directly exposes a problem, or a possible solution to a contractual and/or societal issue. Union members engage in such actions to spotlight an injustice with the goal of correcting it. It further mobilizes the membership to work in concerted fashion for their own good and improvement. ACCRETION – The addition or consolidation of new employees or a new bargaining unit to or with an existing bargaining unit. ACROSS THE BOARD INCREASE - A general wage increase that covers all the members of a bargaining unit, regardless of classification, grade or step level. Such an increase may be in terms of a percentage or dollar amount. ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE – An agent of the National Labor Relations Board or the public sector commission appointed to docket, hear, settle and decide unfair labor practice cases nationwide or statewide in the public sector. They also conduct and preside over formal hearings/trials on an unfair labor practice complaint or a representation case. AFL-CIO - The American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations is the national federation of unions in the United States. It is made up of fifty-six national and international unions, together representing more than 12 million active and retired workers.
  • Beyond Immigrant Ethnic Politics? Organizational Innovation, Collaboration and Competition in the Los Angeles Immigrant Rights Movement (1980-2015) Gnes, D

    Beyond Immigrant Ethnic Politics? Organizational Innovation, Collaboration and Competition in the Los Angeles Immigrant Rights Movement (1980-2015) Gnes, D

    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Beyond immigrant ethnic politics? Organizational innovation, collaboration and competition in the Los Angeles immigrant rights movement (1980-2015) Gnes, D. Publication date 2018 Document Version Other version License Other Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Gnes, D. (2018). Beyond immigrant ethnic politics? Organizational innovation, collaboration and competition in the Los Angeles immigrant rights movement (1980-2015). General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:29 Sep 2021 CHAPTER 6.161 BEYOND THE LOS ANGELES MODEL? UNDERSTANDING THE EVOLUTION OF IMMIGRANT WORKER ORGANIZATIONS THROUGH A HYBRID RESOURCE-BASED MODEL Abstract This paper offers a starting point to explain the emergence, consolidation, and fragmentation of the Los Angeles immigrant workers rights movement over the last three decades.
  • Restoring Equity in Right-To-Work Law

    Restoring Equity in Right-To-Work Law

    Restoring Equity in Right-to-Work Law Catherine L. Fisk & Benjamin I. Sachs* Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 857 I. Reading Section 14(b) ................................................................................................. 860 II. A Genuine Right to Be Nonunion .......................................................................... 866 III. Removing the Obligation to Represent Nonmembers for Free ...................... 874 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 879 INTRODUCTION Under United States labor law, when a majority of employees in a bargaining unit choose union representation, all employees in the unit are then represented by the union and the union must represent all of the employees equally.1 Twenty-four states, however, have enacted laws granting such union-represented employees the right to refuse to pay the union for the services the union is legally obligated to provide.2 Although the name prompts strong objection from union supporters, these laws are known as “right-to-work” laws. Right-to-work laws have been around for decades,3 but they have come to national prominence again as another round of states has enacted the legislation. Michigan—a state with relatively high levels of union density4—enacted a right-to- work statute in 2012, and Indiana became a right-to-work state in 2010.5 As a * The authors are, respectively, Chancellor’s Professor of Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law, and Kestnbaum Professor of Labor and Industry, Harvard Law School. Professor Fisk thanks Daniel Schieffer, and Professor Sachs thanks Ani Gevorkian for excellent research assistance. 1. National Labor Relations Act § 9, 29 U.S.C. § 159(a) (2012). 2. Right to Work Resources, NAT’L CONF. ST. LEGISLATURES, http://www.ncsl.org/issues -research/labor/right-to-work-laws-and-bills.aspx (last visited Sept.
  • Collective Bargaining Agreement the Regional Transportation District

    Collective Bargaining Agreement the Regional Transportation District

    Collective Bargaining Agreement 2018-2021 by and between The Regional Transportation District David A. Genova, General Manager and CEO and Amalgamated Transit Union Local 1001 Julio X. Rivera, President and Business Agent TABLE OF CONTENTS MASTER AGREEMENT ............................................................................................... 10 ARTICLE I ..................................................................................................................... 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................................................. 10 SECTION 1 ................................................................................................................... 10 MANAGEMENT-UNION RELATIONS .......................................................................... 10 SECTION 2 ................................................................................................................... 10 TERM OF AGREEMENT .............................................................................................. 10 SECTION 3 ................................................................................................................... 11 RECOGNITION AND BARGAINING UNIT ................................................................... 11 SECTION 4 ................................................................................................................... 11 ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE PARTIES .......................................... 11 SECTION 5 ..................................................................................................................
  • The Framework of Democracy in Union Government

    The Framework of Democracy in Union Government

    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 1982 The Framework of Democracy in Union Government Roger C. Hartley The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Roger C. Hartley, The Framework of Democracy in Union Government, 32 CATH. U. L. REV. 13 (1982). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE FRAMEWORK OF DEMOCRACY IN UNION GOVERNMENT* Roger C. Hartley** TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ................................................. 15 II. Broad Contours of the Framework .......................... 18 A. The Dual Union Governments .......................... 18 B. Causes of Doctrinal Fragmentation ...................... 20 III. Unions' Assigned Societal Functions ......................... 26 A. The Roots of Ambivalence .............................. 26 1. English and Colonial American Historical and Legal Precedent ............................................ 26 2. Competing Values Raised in the Conspiracy Trials 28 B. Subsequent Forces Conditioning the Right to Assert G roup Interests ......................................... 30 1. Informal Worker Control of Group Conduct ......... 31 2. The Development of Business Unionism ............. 32 a. Worker Political Movements ..................... 32 b. Cooperative Movements .......................... 32 c. The Ascendancy of the Union Movement ........ 33 3. Recognition of the Need for Unions as a Countervailing Force ................................ 34 a. Emergence of Corporate Power .................
  • Catholic Worker

    Catholic Worker

    CATHOLIC WORKER Vol. IV. No. 7 NOVEMBER, 1936 /; Price One Cent Globe Strikers' Mormons Relieve Seamen Strike in Cause Is Right, Brothers Without Face of Corrupt Strike Is Wrong State Assistance Union Leadership· Good Example of Unjust Teach Catholics Lesson New Sit-Down Technique Action by Union and Personalist Way to Used; Hiring Halls Employer • Help Poor Main Issue Dressed as CJ:iinese coolies, a line - Mormons are personalists! Mor­ From Maine to Corpus Christi, of pickets paraded one day last mons have taken the lead from from Grey's Harbor to San Diego, month in front of Globe Mail Serv­ Catholics in caring for their needy. from coast to coast seamen are ice, Inc., at 148 W. 23rd Street, New The Church of the Latter Day striking, registering their common York, in a strike typical of so many Saints has met the crisis in a man­ brotherhood, expressing their dis­ similar cases where the cause is ner which· ought to shame our so­ satisfaction with a system that re• right, but the strike is wrong. called Catholic charitable organiza­ fuses to recognize their digpity as Our first contact was with the tions. · men, as sons of God. strikers, who said that 105 men and Of the 117 "stakes,'' local admin­ We will not repeat details of the women, a majority of the staff, had istrative units, stretching from Alas­ strike, which is spreading so rapidly; walked out on September 29 under ka to Mexico, 112 are participating they have been ably -reported in the the banner of the Bookkeepers', in the "Church Security Plan." daily press.
  • ECCFA Negotiation Glossary

    ECCFA Negotiation Glossary

    ECCFA Negotiation Glossary Bargaining unit The ECCFA. Those employees and job categories that will be covered by the provisions of the contract. Often, not all employees at a work site will be included in the bargaining unit. Supervisors, typically, are excluded by law. Bargaining committee The union representatives who meet with management representatives to negotiate a contract. The committee is often elected by the union membership, may include a union staff person, and speaks for the membership during negotiations. This committee may also draft the contract proposals and counter-proposals. Also known as Negotiation Committee or Team. Collective bargaining The process whereby union and management representatives meet in good faith and attempt to come to mutual agreement on conditions of employment. In most situations, management is required by law to engage in good-faith collective bargaining with a union that has been certified as representing that organization's employees. (See Negotiations) Contract A written document that spells out the terms and conditions of employment as well as the rights and responsibilities of employer and employee. This document applies to a specified group of employees for a specified period of time. Adherence to the terms of the contract is enforceable under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act or appropriate public sector law. Negotiations The process of discussion between the employer and the union for purposes of coming to an agreement on the provisions of a contract governing employment conditions and the rights and responsibilities of labor and management. Chief Negotiators Each side will have a chief negotiator who is charged with the authority to speak for his/her side and to sign agreements resulting from the negotiaiton process.