Applications of Recombinant DNA Technology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Applications of Recombinant DNA Technology POGC14 9/11/2001 11:11 AM Page 274 CHAPTER 14 Applications of recombinant DNA technology Introduction Theme 1: Nucleic acid sequences as diagnostic tools Biotechnology is not new. The making of beer, wine, bread, yoghurt and cheese was practised by ancient Introduction to theme 1 civilizations, such as the Babylonians, the Romans and the Chinese. Much, much later came vaccines, Nucleic acid sequences can be used diagnostically in the production of basic chemicals (e.g. glycerol, two different ways. The first is to determine whether citric acid, lactic acid) and the development of anti- a particular, relatively long sequence is present in or biotics. In each of these examples, existing properties absent from a test sample. A good example of such of microorganisms were exploited. For example, an application is the diagnosis of infectious disease. Penicillium species naturally make penicillin. What By choosing appropriate probes, one can ascertain the scientists have done is to increase the yield of in a single step which, if any, microorganisms are penicillin by repeated rounds of mutation and present in a sample. Alternatively, a search could be selection, coupled with optimization of the growth made for the presence of known antibiotic-resistance medium. Similarly, sexual crosses between related determinants so that an appropriate therapeutic plant species have created high-yielding and disease- regime can be instituted. In the second way in which resistant varieties of cereals. These improved cereals sequences are used diagnostically, the objective is to represent new combinations of genes and alleles determine the similarity of sequences from different already existing in wild strains. individuals. Good examples of this approach are With the development of gene manipulation tech- prenatal diagnosis of genetic disease and forensic niques in the 1970s, there was a major paradigm profiling (‘DNA fingerprinting’). shift. For the first time microorganisms could be made to synthesize compounds that they had never Detection of sequences at the gross level synthesized before, e.g. insulin production in E. coli ( Johnson 1983). Soon all sorts of commercially or Imagine that a seriously ill individual has a disorder therapeutically useful proteins were being made in of the gastrointestinal tract. A likely cause is a bacteria, principally E. coli, and thus the modern microbial infection and there are a number of candid- biotechnology industry was born. As the techniques ate organisms (Table 14.1). The question is, which developed for manipulating genes in bacteria were organism is present and to which antibiotics is it extended to plants and animals there was a con- susceptible? The sooner one has an answer to these comitant expansion of the biotechnology industry questions, the sooner effective therapy can begin. to exploit the new opportunities being provided. Traditionally, in such a case, a stool specimen would Today there are many different facets to the com- be cultured on a variety of different media and would mercial exploitation of gene manipulation tech- be examined microscopically and tested with vari- niques as shown in Fig. 14.1. Rather than discuss ous immunological reagents. A simpler approach all these topics in detail, for that would take a book is to test the sample with a battery of probes and in itself, we have chosen to focus on six inter- determine which, if any, hybridize in a simple dot- disciplinary themes that reflect both the successes blot assay. With such a simple format it is possible to achieved to date and the likely successes in the next vary the stringency of the hybridization reaction to decade. accommodate any sequence differences that might POGC14 9/11/2001 11:11 AM Page 275 Applications of recombinant DNA technology 275 Transgenic Nucleic animals acids Therapeutic proteins Anti-sense Improved farm Gene therapy/repair animals Diagnostic probes Disease models Vaccines Recombinant DNA technology ‘Pharming’ Vaccines Vaccines Small molecules Small molecules Therapeutic proteins Therapeutic proteins Improved plants Enzymes Biopolymers Transgenic Recombinant plants microbes Fig. 14.1 The different ways that recombinant DNA technology has been exploited. exist between the probe and the target. The down- Table 14.1 Pathogens causing infection of the side of this approach is that if one wishes to test the gastrointestinal tract. sample with 10 different probes, then 10 different dot blots are required; otherwise there is no way of Bacteria Salmonella spp. determining which probe has bound to the target. Shigella spp. Another disadvantage of this approach is that Yersinia enterocolitica sufficient target DNA must be present in the sample Enterotoxigenic E. coli to enable a signal to be detected on hybridization. Clostridium difficile Both of these problems can be overcome by using the Clostridium welchii Campylobacter spp. polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Aeromonas spp. In a traditional dot-blot assay, the sample DNA is Vibrio spp. immobilized on a membrane and hybridized with a Viruses selection of labelled probes. An alternative is a Rotaviruses ‘reverse dot blot’, where the probes are immobilized Enteroviruses on the membrane and hybridized with the sample. Enteric adenoviruses In this way, only one hybridization step is required, Protozoa because each probe occupies a unique position on Entamoeba histolytica the membrane (Fig. 14.2). For this approach to Giardia Iamblia work, the sample DNA needs to be labelled and this can be achieved using the PCR. This has the added POGC14 9/11/2001 11:11 AM Page 276 276 CHAPTER 14 Conventional dot blot Membrane Test DNA Test DNA Test DNA Test DNA Test DNA Probe Probe Probe Probe Probe A B C D E Reverse dot blot Probe AProbe B Probe C Probe D Probe E Labelled Fig. 14.2 Comparison of conventional test DNA dot blot assay with reverse dot blot method. Note that in the latter there is only a single hybridization reaction, regardless of the number of probes used, whereas in the former each probe has to be tested in a separate hybridization step. benefit of amplifying the sample, thereby minimizing Despite the difficulties noted above, multiplex PCR the amount of target DNA required. The downside has been used successfully in the diagnosis of infec- of this approach is that the amplification step needs tious diseases. For example, Heredia et al. (1996) to be done with multiple pairs of primers (multiplex have used the method to simultaneously examine PCR), one for each target sequence. Although blood for the presence of HIV-1, HIV-2, human multiplex PCR is now an established method, con- T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I and HTLV-II. siderable optimization is needed for each application Similarly, Grondahl et al. (1999) have used the (Elnifro et al. 2000). The major problems encoun- method to identify which of nine different organisms tered are poor sensitivity or specificity and/or pre- is responsible for respiratory infections. Once the ferential amplification of certain specific targets. clinical microbiologist knows the identity of a micro- The presence of more than one primer pair in the organism in a specimen, he/she can select those reaction increases the chance of obtaining spurious antibiotics that might be effective, provided that amplification products because of the formation of the organism in question does not carry multiple primer dimers. Such non-specific products may be drug-resistance determinants. The presence of these amplified more efficiently than the desired target. determinants can also be established using multi- Clearly, the design of each primer pair is crucial to plex PCR. Alternatively, if a virus causes the infec- avoiding this problem. Another important feature is tion, one can monitor the progress of the infection by that all primer pairs should enable similar amplifica- using quantitative PCR (see p. 23). This approach tion efficiencies for their respective targets. has been used to monitor cytomegalovirus infec- POGC14 9/11/2001 11:11 AM Page 277 Applications of recombinant DNA technology 277 tions in kidney-transplant patients (Caballero et al. two 19-mer oligonucleotides, one of which was 1997). It is worth noting that the development complementary to the amino-terminal region of the of multiplex PCR technology is being facilitated by normal β-globin (βA) gene and the other of which the rapid progress in the sequencing of microbial was complementary to the sickle-cell β-globin gene genomes (for an up-to-date list, see http//igweb.integ- (βS). These oligonucleotides were radiolabelled and ratedgenomics.com/GOLD/), since the data gener- used to probe Southern blots. Under appropriate ated enable species-specific genes or sequences to be conditions, the probes could distinguish the normal identified. and mutant alleles. The DNA from normal homo- zygotes only hybridized with the βA probe and DNA from sickle-cell homozygotes only hybridized with Comparative sequence analysis: single- the βS probe. DNA of heterozygotes hybridized with nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) both probes. These experiments, therefore, showed In prenatal diagnosis of genetic disorders, there is that oligonucleotide hybridization probes can dis- a need to determine which alleles of a particular criminate between a fully complementary DNA and locus are being carried by the fetus, i.e. is the fetus one containing a single mismatched base. Similar homozygous for the normal or the deleterious allele results have been obtained (Fig. 14.3) with a point or is it heterozygous? In forensic DNA profiling the mutation in the α-antitrypsin gene, which is implic- requirement is to match DNA from the perpetrator ated in pulmonary emphysema (Cox et al. 1985). of a crime with that of a suspect. In each case, a The single-base changes that occur in the two definitive answer could be obtained by sequencing clinical examples just quoted are examples of single- the relevant samples of DNA. While this is possible, it nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, pronounced is not practicable for mass screening.
Recommended publications
  • Recombinant DNA and Elements Utilizing Recombinant DNA Such As Plasmids and Viral Vectors, and the Application of Recombinant DNA Techniques in Molecular Biology
    Fact Sheet Describing Recombinant DNA and Elements Utilizing Recombinant DNA Such as Plasmids and Viral Vectors, and the Application of Recombinant DNA Techniques in Molecular Biology Compiled and/or written by Amy B. Vento and David R. Gillum Office of Environmental Health and Safety University of New Hampshire June 3, 2002 Introduction Recombinant DNA (rDNA) has various definitions, ranging from very simple to strangely complex. The following are three examples of how recombinant DNA is defined: 1. A DNA molecule containing DNA originating from two or more sources. 2. DNA that has been artificially created. It is DNA from two or more sources that is incorporated into a single recombinant molecule. 3. According to the NIH guidelines, recombinant DNA are molecules constructed outside of living cells by joining natural or synthetic DNA segments to DNA molecules that can replicate in a living cell, or molecules that result from their replication. Description of rDNA Recombinant DNA, also known as in vitro recombination, is a technique involved in creating and purifying desired genes. Molecular cloning (i.e. gene cloning) involves creating recombinant DNA and introducing it into a host cell to be replicated. One of the basic strategies of molecular cloning is to move desired genes from a large, complex genome to a small, simple one. The process of in vitro recombination makes it possible to cut different strands of DNA, in vitro (outside the cell), with a restriction enzyme and join the DNA molecules together via complementary base pairing. Techniques Some of the molecular biology techniques utilized during recombinant DNA include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Engineering and Sustainable Crop Disease Management: Opportunities for Case-By-Case Decision-Making
    sustainability Review Genetic Engineering and Sustainable Crop Disease Management: Opportunities for Case-by-Case Decision-Making Paul Vincelli Department of Plant Pathology, 207 Plant Science Building, College of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA; [email protected] Academic Editor: Sean Clark Received: 22 March 2016; Accepted: 13 May 2016; Published: 20 May 2016 Abstract: Genetic engineering (GE) offers an expanding array of strategies for enhancing disease resistance of crop plants in sustainable ways, including the potential for reduced pesticide usage. Certain GE applications involve transgenesis, in some cases creating a metabolic pathway novel to the GE crop. In other cases, only cisgenessis is employed. In yet other cases, engineered genetic changes can be so minimal as to be indistinguishable from natural mutations. Thus, GE crops vary substantially and should be evaluated for risks, benefits, and social considerations on a case-by-case basis. Deployment of GE traits should be with an eye towards long-term sustainability; several options are discussed. Selected risks and concerns of GE are also considered, along with genome editing, a technology that greatly expands the capacity of molecular biologists to make more precise and targeted genetic edits. While GE is merely a suite of tools to supplement other breeding techniques, if wisely used, certain GE tools and applications can contribute to sustainability goals. Keywords: biotechnology; GMO (genetically modified organism) 1. Introduction and Background Disease management practices can contribute to sustainability by protecting crop yields, maintaining and improving profitability for crop producers, reducing losses along the distribution chain, and reducing the negative environmental impacts of diseases and their management.
    [Show full text]
  • A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel the Father of Genetics
    A Short History of DNA Technology 1865 - Gregor Mendel The Father of Genetics The Augustinian monastery in old Brno, Moravia 1865 - Gregor Mendel • Law of Segregation • Law of Independent Assortment • Law of Dominance 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan Genetics of Drosophila • Short generation time • Easy to maintain • Only 4 pairs of chromosomes 1865 1915 - T.H. Morgan •Genes located on chromosomes •Sex-linked inheritance wild type mutant •Gene linkage 0 •Recombination long aristae short aristae •Genetic mapping gray black body 48.5 body (cross-over maps) 57.5 red eyes cinnabar eyes 67.0 normal wings vestigial wings 104.5 red eyes brown eyes 1865 1928 - Frederick Griffith “Rough” colonies “Smooth” colonies Transformation of Streptococcus pneumoniae Living Living Heat killed Heat killed S cells mixed S cells R cells S cells with living R cells capsule Living S cells in blood Bacterial sample from dead mouse Strain Injection Results 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 One Gene - One Enzyme Hypothesis Neurospora crassa Ascus Ascospores placed X-rays Fruiting on complete body medium All grow Minimal + amino acids No growth Minimal Minimal + vitamins in mutants Fragments placed on minimal medium Minimal plus: Mutant deficient in enzyme that synthesizes arginine Cys Glu Arg Lys His 1865 Beadle & Tatum - 1941 Gene A Gene B Gene C Minimal Medium + Citruline + Arginine + Ornithine Wild type PrecursorEnz A OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Metabolic block Class I Precursor OrnithineEnz B CitrulineEnz C Arginine Mutants Class II Mutants PrecursorEnz A Ornithine
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Creative Components Dissertations Fall 2021 Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops Madeline Esquivel Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents Part of the Agricultural Education Commons Recommended Citation Esquivel, Madeline, "Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops" (2021). Creative Components. 731. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/creativecomponents/731 This Creative Component is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Creative Components by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Barriers to Adoption of GM Crops By Madeline M. Esquivel A Creative Component submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Plant Breeding Program of Study Committee: Walter Suza, Major Professor Thomas Lübberstedt Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2021 1 Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 2. What is a Genetically Modified Organism?................................................................................ 9 2.1 The Development of Modern Varieties and Genetically Modified Crops .......................... 10 2.2 GM vs Traditional Breeding: How Are GM Crops Produced?
    [Show full text]
  • World Resources Institute the Monsanto Company
    World Resources Institute Sustainable Enterprise Program A program of the World Resources Institute The Monsanto Company: Quest for Sustainability (A) “Biotechnology represents a potentially sustainable For more than a decade, WRI's solution to the issue, not only of feeding people, but of providing Sustainable Enterprise Program (SEP) the economic growth that people are going to need to escape has harnessed the power of business to poverty…… [Biotechnology] poses the possibility of create profitable solutions to leapfrogging the industrial revolution and moving to a post- environment and development industrial society that is not only economically attractive, but challenges. BELL, a project of SEP, is also environmentally sustainable.i ” focused on working with managers and academics to make companies --Robert Shapiro, CEO, Monsanto Company more competitive by approaching social and environmental challenges as unmet market needs that provide Upon his promotion to CEO of chemical giant The business growth opportunities through Monsanto Company in 1995, Robert Shapiro became a vocal entrepreneurship, innovation, and champion of sustainable development and sought to redefine the organizational change. firm’s business strategy along principles of sustainability. Shapiro’s rhetoric was compelling. He captured analysts’ Permission to reprint this case is attention with the specter of mass hunger and environmental available at the BELL case store. degradation precipitated by rapid population growth and the Additional information on the Case
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Corporation Obtaining Approval, the Name of Its Representative, and the Address of Its Main Office Name: Bayer Crop Science K
    Corporation obtaining approval, the name of its representative, and the address of its main office Name: Bayer Crop Science K.K. John Gray, President Address: Marunouchi Kitaguchi Building, 1-6-5, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo Approved Type 1 Use Regulation Name of the Type of Glufosinate herbicide tolerant, male sterile and fertility restored Living Modified oilseed rape (Modified bar, barnase, barstar, Brassica napus L.) Organism (MS1RF1, OECD UI :ACS-BNØØ4-7×ACS-BNØØ1-4) Content of the Type 1 Provision as food, provision as feed, processing, storage, Use of Living Modified transportation, disposal and acts incidental to them Organism Method of the Type 1 Use of Living Modified ― Organism 1 Outline of the Biological Diversity Risk Assessment Report I. Information collected prior to assessing Adverse Effect on Biological Diversity 1. Information concerning preparation of living modified organisms (1) Information concerning donor nucleic acid 1) Composition and origins of component elements Glufosinate herbicide tolerant and male sterile and fertility restored oilseed rape (modified bar, barnase, barstar, Brassica napus L., MS1RF1, OECD UI: ACS-BNØØ4-7 x ACS-BNØØ 1-4) (hereinafter referred to as “MS1RF1”) is a hybrid obtained by a cross between glufosinate herbicide tolerant and male sterile oilseed rape (modified bar, barnase, Brassica napus L., MS1, OECD UI: ACS-BNØØ4-7) (hereinafter referred to as “MS1”) and glufosinate herbicide tolerant and fertility restored oilseed rape (modified bar, barstar, Brassica napus L., RF1, OECD UI: ACS-BNØØ1-4) (hereinafter referred to as “RF1”). Composition of the donor nucleic acid that was used for the production of MS1 and RF1, the parent plants of MS1RF1, and the origins of component elements are shown in Table 1-1 and Table 1-2 respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Viral Transfection of Human T Lymphocytes
    processes Article Non-Viral Transfection of Human T Lymphocytes Simon A. B. Riedl 1, Patrick Kaiser 1 , Alexander Raup 1,2, Christopher V. Synatschke 3, Valérie Jérôme 1 and Ruth Freitag 1,* 1 Process Biotechnology, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany; [email protected] (S.A.B.R.); [email protected] (P.K.); [email protected] (A.R.); [email protected] (V.J.) 2 Agap2—HIQ Consulting GmbH, 60323 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3 Department Synthesis of Macromolecules, Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research, 55128 Mainz, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-921-55-7371 Received: 10 September 2018; Accepted: 9 October 2018; Published: 11 October 2018 Abstract: The genetic modification of human T lymphocytes with established non-viral methods is inefficient. Linear polyethylenimine (l-PEI), one of the most popular non-viral transfection agents for mammalian cells in general, only achieves transfection rates in the single digit percentage range for these cells. Here, a well-defined 24-armed poly(2-dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (PDMAEMA) nanostar (number average of the molecular weight: 755 kDa, polydispersity: <1.21) synthesized via atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP) from a silsesquioxane initiator core is proposed as alternative. The agent is used to prepare polyplexes with plasmid DNA (pDNA). Under optimal conditions these polyplexes reproducibly transfect >80% of the cells from a human T-cell leukemia cell line (Jurkat cells) at viabilities close to 90%. The agent also promotes pDNA uptake when simply added to a mixture of cells and pDNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Transgenic Animals
    IQP-43-DSA-4208 IQP-43-DSA-6270 TRANSGENIC ANIMALS An Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Science By: _________________________ _________________________ William Caproni Erik Dahlinghaus August 24, 2012 APPROVED: _________________________ Prof. David S. Adams, PhD WPI Project Advisor ABSTRACT A transgenic animal contains genes not native to its species. The use of these animals in research and medicine has dramatically increased our understanding of genetics and disease modeling. This IQP aims to provide an overview of the technical development and applications of transgenic animals, as well as the ethical, legal, and societal ramifications of creating these animals. Finally, this IQP will draw conclusions from the research performed and the information gathered. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page …………………………………………..…………………………….. 1 Abstract …………………………………………………..……………………………. 2 Table of Contents ………………………………………..…………………………….. 3 Project Objective ……………………………………….....…………………………… 4 Chapter-1: Transgenic Animal Technology …….……….…………………………… 5 Chapter-2: Applications of Transgenics in Animals …………..…………………….. 19 Chapter-3: Transgenic Ethics ………………………………………………………... 32 Chapter-4: Transgenic Legalities ……………………..………………………………. 43 Project Conclusions...…………………………………..….…………………………… 53 3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES The objective of this project was to research and present a multifaceted view of transgenics, including the technology itself and its effects on mankind. Chapter one offers an overview of the different methods for creating and testing transgenic animals. Chapter two provides information on how the different types of transgenic animals are used, and how they affect our daily lives. Chapter three presents the many ethical issues surrounding this controversial technology, and its impact on society. Chapter four describes the legal issues regarding this emerging technology and the patenting of life.
    [Show full text]
  • An Efficient Recombination System for Chromosome Engineering in Escherichia Coli
    An efficient recombination system for chromosome engineering in Escherichia coli Daiguan Yu*, Hilary M. Ellis*, E-Chiang Lee†, Nancy A. Jenkins†, Neal G. Copeland†, and Donald L. Court*‡ *Gene Regulation and Chromosome Biology Laboratory and †Mouse Cancer Genetics Program, National Cancer Institute, Division of Basic Science, National Cancer Institute͞Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD 21702 Communicated by Allan Campbell, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, March 22, 2000 (received for review January 19, 2000) A recombination system has been developed for efficient chromo- frequencies of recombination with linear DNA containing long some engineering in Escherichia coli by using electroporated linear homologies by transforming in the presence of the bacteriophage DNA. A defective ␭ prophage supplies functions that protect and ␭ recombination functions (Exo and Beta) in a bacterial recBCD recombine an electroporated linear DNA substrate in the bacterial mutant background. This ␭ recombination system, like yeast, cell. The use of recombination eliminates the requirement for uses double strand break repair (10, 11). In a recBC sbcA strain, standard cloning as all novel joints are engineered by chemical short regions of homology can function in recombination of synthesis in vitro and the linear DNA is efficiently recombined into linear DNA; however, recombination is inefficient (12). In recϩ place in vivo. The technology and manipulations required are backgrounds, gene replacement on the chromosome has been simple and straightforward. A temperature-dependent repressor accomplished by integration and excision of episomes carrying tightly controls prophage expression, and, thus, recombination bacterial homology (13, 14). functions can be transiently supplied by shifting cultures to 42°C To obtain efficient recombination of linear donor DNA in for 15 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrobacterium-Mediated DNA Transfer, and Then Some
    NEWS AND VieWS Uncloned sequencing Enrichment with DNA- No assembly stable isotopic probes No enrichment and isopycnic centrifuge Substrate enrichment BrdU probe Microbes with labeled DNA identifying those Entire microbial community utilizing specific substrates Community actively growing Functional overview in association with substrate Specific functional guilds comparing differences enabling novel pathways across environments to be identified Subdividing the microbes into functional groups enabling within-environment comparison http://www.nature.com/naturebiotechnology Community Specific capacities metabolic tasks Figure 1 Different methods for analyzing microbial communities provide different levels of selectivity and functional description. These tools enable researchers to describe microbes from community capacities to individual metabolic tasks. once again demonstrates that microbes incor- DNA-SIP) (Fig. 1)1. These metagenomic tools 3. Breitbart, M. et al. PNAS 22, 14250 (2002). 4. Edwards, R.A. et al. BMC Genomics 7, 57 (2006). porate new DNA when exposed to different will provide deeper insights into the produc- 5. Dinsdale, E.A. et al. PLoS ONE 3, e1584 (2008). nutrient sources and that these new acquisi- tivity of microbial communities and the speci- 6. DeLong, E.F. et al. Science 311, 496 (2006). Nature Publishing Group Group Nature Publishing 8 tions allow them to use multiple chemicals. fication of individual metabolic tasks. 7. Tringe, S.G. et al. Science 308, 544 (2005). 8. Dinsdale, E.A. et al. Nature 452, 629 (2008). M. mobilis displayed remarkable flexibility: for 200 1. Kalyuzhnaya, M.G. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 1029– 9. Mou, X. et al. Nature 451, 708 (2008). 1034 (2008). 10. McHardy, A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dawn of Recombinant DNA
    MILESTONES DOI: M ilestone 2 10.1038/nrg2246 The dawn of recombinant DNA The ability to make recombinant DNA molecules is the cornerstone CORBIS of modern molecular biology. Yet 40 years ago, it was hardly a conceivable accomplishment. In the 1960s, biologists had realized that DNA recombination happens in the cell — for example, when breaks caused by ultraviolet irradiation are repaired — and the search for an enzyme that could join DNA molecules was on. The breakthrough came at the beginning of 1967, when Martin Gellert at the National Institutes of Health showed that Escherichia coli extracts could convert λ phage DNA ‘hydrogen- bonded circles’ into a covalently circular form. Within 6 months, Gellert and three other groups inde- fragments from two plasmids experiments. However, the founda- pendently purified the enzymatic (each conferring resistance to one tion had been laid and progress soon activity, which formed phosphodi- antibiotic), joined them using DNA resumed. ester bonds between DNA ends ligase and applied the mixture to Veronique Kiermer, Chief Editor, held by hydrogen-bond pairing in a transform E. coli. As they had hoped, Nature Methods double-stranded configuration. a fraction of the transformed bacteria DNA ligase, which was the first became resistant to both antibiotics ORIGINAL RESEARCH PAPERS Gellert, M. Formation of covalent circles of λ DNA by E. coli ingredient for making recombinant while carrying a single hybrid extracts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 57, 148–155 DNA, was then at hand, but plasmid. Not only had they demon- (1967) | Cohen, S. N., Chang, A. C. Y. & Hsu, L. other ingredients, like restriction strated that bacterial plasmids con- Nonchromosomal antibiotic resistance in bacteria: genetic transformation of E.
    [Show full text]
  • Agricultural Biotechnology: Overview, Regulation, and Selected Policy Issues
    Agricultural Biotechnology: Overview, Regulation, and Selected Policy Issues March 29, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46737 SUMMARY R46737 Agricultural Biotechnology: Overview, March 29, 2021 Regulation, and Selected Policy Issues Genevieve K. Croft Agricultural biotechnology refers to a range of tools—including genetic engineering and some Analyst in Agricultural conventional breeding techniques—to genetically modify living plants, animals, microbes, and Policy other organisms for agricultural uses (e.g., food, feed, fiber). The term commonly refers to recombinant DNA techniques that introduce desired characteristics into target organisms, predominantly pest and herbicide resistance in crops. It also encompasses a range of new genome editing technologies (e.g., CRISPR-Cas9) that manipulate genetic material at precise locations in the genome. Most genetically engineered (GE) agricultural products are crops—in the United States, the only GE animals currently approved for human consumption are the AquAdvantage salmon and the GalSafe pig. When foods containing GE ingredients were first introduced in the 1990s, some members of the public called for banning them based on concerns about their potential to harm human health. In terms of the health and safety of the people consuming them, research repeatedly has found no difference between foods developed with and without genetic engineering. Even so, some consumers remain concerned about genetic engineering, citing health, personal preference, environmental, economic, and other objections. As such, the views of the scientific community, consumers, farmers and ranchers, and the organic industry on the safety, utility, and ethics of agricultural biotechnology do not always overlap. Society continues to debate these issues, and numerous advocacy and trade organizations promote various sides of the debate.
    [Show full text]