UDBG Inventory of Tree and and Shrubs June 1, 2018 Page 1
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Wetland Condition Index (WCI): Biological Indicators of Wetland Condition for Isolated Depressional Herbaceous Wetlands in Florida
The Wetland Condition Index (WCI): Biological Indicators of Wetland Condition for Isolated Depressional Herbaceous Wetlands in Florida Report Submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection under Contract #WM-683 By Charles R. Lane with Mark T. Brown, Mike Murray-Hudson, and M. Benjamin Vivas H.T. Odum Center for Wetlands University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-6350 September 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This research was supported under a research contract from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP); M.T. Brown, principal investigator. We would like to acknowledge the support of FDEP staff, especially Russ Frydenborg, Ashley O’Neal, Ellen McCarron, Liz Miller, Lori Wolfe, Joy Jackson, Johnny Richardson, and the FDEP Central Laboratory in Tallahassee. Additional acknowledgement is due to the research group of the H.T. Odum Center for Wetlands, especially Kelly Reiss, Matt Cohen, Jim Surdick, and Susan Carstenn. We also thank the members of the 1999 and 2000 field crew for their tireless and enthusiastic work, especially Mark Fowlkes, Mark Otto, and Michael Stevens. Steven Doherty was an integral part of the initial stages of this research, and his perseverance and hard work helped to ensure this research to fruition. This project and the preparation of this report were funded in part by a Section 319 Nonpoint Source Management grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through a contract with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. -
State of New York City's Plants 2018
STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species. -
Explosive Radiation in High Andean Hypericum—Rates of Diversification
ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 11 September 2013 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2013.00175 Explosive radiation in high Andean Hypericum—rates of diversification among New World lineages Nicolai M. Nürk 1*, Charlotte Scheriau 1 and Santiago Madriñán 2 1 Department of Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, Centre for Organismal Studies Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany 2 Laboratorio de Botánica y Sistemática, Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá DC, Colombia Edited by: The páramos, high-elevation Andean grasslands ranging from ca. 2800 m to the snow Federico Luebert, Freie Universität line, harbor one of the fastest evolving biomes worldwide since their appearance in the Berlin, Germany northern Andes 3–5 million years (Ma) ago. Hypericum (St. John’s wort), with over 65% Reviewed by: of its Neotropical species, has a center of diversity in these high Mountain ecosystems. Andrea S. Meseguer, Institute National de la research agricultural, Using nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences of a broad sample of France New World Hypericum species we investigate phylogenetic patterns, estimate divergence Colin Hughes, University of Zurich, times, and provide the first insights into diversification rates within the genus in the Switzerland Neotropics. Two lineages appear to have independently dispersed into South America *Correspondence: around 3.5 Ma ago, one of which has radiated in the páramos (Brathys). We find strong Nicolai M. Nürk, Department of Biodiversity and Plant Systematics, support for the polyphyly of section Trigynobrathys, several species of which group within Centre for Organismal Studies Brathys, while others are found in temperate lowland South America (Trigynobrathys Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, s.str.). -
National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt. -
St. Joseph Bay Native Species List
Status Common Name Species Name State Federal Amphibians Salamanders Flatwoods Salamander Ambystoma cingulatum SSC T Marbled Salamander Ambystoma opacum Mole Salamander Ambystoma talpoideum Eastern Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum tigrinum Two-toed Amphiuma Amphiuma means One-toed Amphiuma Amphiuma pholeter Southern Dusky Salamander Desmognathus auriculatus Dusky Salamander Desmognathus fuscus Southern Two-lined Salamander Eurycea bislineata cirrigera Three-lined Salamander Eurycea longicauda guttolineata Dwarf Salamander Eurycea quadridigitata Alabama Waterdog Necturus alabamensis Central Newt Notophthalmus viridescens louisianensis Slimy Salamander Plethodon glutinosus glutinosus Slender Dwarf Siren Pseudobranchus striatus spheniscus Gulf Coast Mud Salamander Pseudotriton montanus flavissimus Southern Red Salamander Pseudotriton ruber vioscai Eastern Lesser Siren Siren intermedia intermedia Greater Siren Siren lacertina Toads Oak Toad Bufo quercicus Southern Toad Bufo terrestris Eastern Spadefoot Toad Scaphiopus holbrooki holbrooki Frogs Florida Cricket Frog Acris gryllus dorsalis Eastern Narrow-mouthed Frog Gastrophryne carolinensis Western Bird-voiced Treefrog Hyla avivoca avivoca Cope's Gray Treefrog Hyla chrysoscelis Green Treefrog Hyla cinerea Southern Spring Peeper Hyla crucifer bartramiana Pine Woods Treefrog Hyla femoralis Barking Treefrog Hyla gratiosa Squirrel Treefrog Hyla squirella Gray Treefrog Hyla versicolor Little Grass Frog Limnaoedus ocularis Southern Chorus Frog Pseudacris nigrita nigrita Ornate Chorus Frog Pseudacris -
The Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society
Volume 28: Number 3 > Summer/Fall 2011 PalmettoThe Quarterly Journal of the Florida Native Plant Society Invasion of the Climbing Ferns ● Wildflowers of Tosohatchee ● Stickywilly ● Landscape Awards Part II Right: Checking the book. Photo by Vince Lamb. Hunting Wildflowers at Tosohatchee WMA Walter Kingsley Taylor The long-anticipated day had arrived. It was Thursday, May 19, and the 31st Annual Conference of the Florida Native Plant Society was a reality. The fruits of labor from all the planning, numerous meetings held, and emails exchanged would come to fruition. Field trip “G” to the Tosohatchee Wildlife Management Area (TOS) near Christmas, Orange County, Florida, was about to roll. Just a few days earlier, the new Taylor Creek Road bridge was finished and opened for traffic. This cut traveling miles for the 20 folks scheduled to come on trip “G”, and the other TOS FNPS field trip led by Katherine Bowman and Pete Dunkelberg. The weather was perfect. Fortunately, the area had recently received a needed rain and I knew the plants would be perked-up and ready to show off their colors. About a week before this gorgeous day, Karin and I motored to the TOS to survey things only to find the ground to be quite dry with many plants drooping. As we drove through the TOS main gate, there were our good friends Ray Jarrett, Sid Taylor, and Rita Grant, and a few other attendees to greet us. Ray had his boots on and was ready to go. He had directed the first vehicles to the appropriate parking area. -
Field Identification Guide to WAP Plants 2008 3Rd Ed
The Field Identification Guide to Plants Used in the Wetland Assessment Procedure (WAP) Contributors: Shirley R. Denton, Ph.D. - Biological Research Associates Diane Willis, MS – GPI Southeast, Inc. April 2008 Third Edition (2015 Printing) The Field Identification Guide was prepared by the Southwest Florida Water Management District. Additional copies can be obtained from the District at: Southwest Florida Water Management District Resource Projects Department Ecological Evaluation Section 2379 Broad Street Brooksville, Florida 34604 The Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) does not discriminate on the basis of disability. This nondiscrimination policy involves every aspect of the District’s functions, including access to and participation in the District’s programs and activities. Anyone requiring reasonable accommodation as provided for in the Americans with Disabilities Act should contact the District’s Human Resources Bureau Chief, 2379 Broad St., Brooksville, FL 34604-6899; telephone (352) 796-7211 or 1-800-423-1476 (FL only), ext. 4703; or email [email protected]. If you are hearing or speech impaired, please contact the agency using the Florida Relay Service, 1(800)955-8771 (TDD) or 1(800)955-8770 (Voice). Introduction In 1996, the Florida Legislature directed the Southwest Florida Water Management District (District) to begin the process of establishing Minimum Flows and Levels (MFLs) throughout the District, beginning in Hillsborough, Pasco, and Pinellas counties. MFLs are defined as the flow in watercourses below which significant harm to water resources and ecology of the area would occur, and the level in surface-water bodies and aquifers in which significant harm to the water resources of the area would occur. -
Millepertuis (Hypericum) – Famille : Hypericacées
Millepertuis (Hypericum) – Famille : Hypericacées Les millepertuis utilisés pour l’ornement de nos jardins sont uniquement constitués de petits arbustes dont la hauteur s’échelonne d’une cinquantaine de centimètres à environ 1,20 m. Cependant, il en existe quelques uns qui se présentent comme de véritables arbustes ou petits arbres, mais également de nombreuses plantes vivaces ou annuelles. Leur intérêt est essentiellement porté par leurs fleurs jaunes possédant majoritairement 5 pétales, à leurs très nombreuses étamines, parfois à leur fruits constitués de capsules. Principe de ramification La très grande majorité des millepertuis se régénèrent naturellement par la formation de nouvelles pousses issues directement de la souche, de la base des rameaux (basitonie), ou parfois issues de la partie médiane (arcures). Exceptionnellement, les nouvelles pousses ne se forment qu’en extrémité des rameaux préexistants (acrotonie). Principe de floraison Tous les millepertuis laissent apparaître leur floraison en extrémité des pousses formées au cours de l’année. Parfois, la floraison est cependant plus abondante sur les bois courts issus de ramifications secondaires formées sur des bois plus âgés. La taille des millepertuis Hypericum inodorum ‘Elstead’ Bien que ce millepertuis soit capable de former une mini charpente, la floraison et la qualité du feuillage ne sont jamais si belles que quand les plantes sont rabattues totalement annuellement, en fin d’hiver. Taille de plantation Rabattre les plantes à quelques centimètres du sol. En l’absence de taille (photo de gauche), Hypericum inodorum ‘Elstead’ se dégarnit très vite et son port présente peu d’intérêt. Rabattu sur la souche chaque année, il développe des rameaux vigoureux, un feuillage sain, et présente de délicates inflorescences jaunes. -
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Northeast Region Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Vegetation Classification and Mapping at Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR—2007/079 USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site ON THE COVER Allegheny Hardwood Forest in Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site. Photograph by: Ephraim Zimmerman. USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Vegetation Classification and Mapping at Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site Technical Report NPS/NER/NRTR--2006/079 Stephanie J. Perles1, Gregory S. Podniesinski1, Ephraim A. Zimmerman1, Elizabeth Eastman 2, and Lesley A. Sneddon3 1 Pennsylvania Natural Heritage Program Western Pennsylvania Conservancy 208 Airport Drive Middletown, PA 17057 2 Center for Earth Observation North Carolina State University 5112 Jordan Hall, Box 7106 Raleigh, NC 27695 3 NatureServe 11 Avenue de Lafayette, 5th Floor Boston, MA 02111 March 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Northeast Region Philadelphia, Pennsylvania i USGS – NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site The Northeast Region of the National Park Service (NPS) comprises national parks and related areas in 13 New England and Mid-Atlantic states. The diversity of parks and their resources are reflected in their designations as national parks, seashores, historic sites, recreation areas, military parks, memorials, and rivers and trails. Biological, physical, and social science research results, natural resource inventory and monitoring data, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences related to these park units are disseminated through the NPS/NER Technical Report (NRTR) and Natural Resources Report (NRR) series. -
Meadow and Woodland Toolkit
Meadow & Woodland Toolkit PEOPLE FOR POLLINATORS EXISTING CONDITIONS People for Pollinators is a 8,700 sq.ft planted mead- particular) but also with regards to aesthetics and the ow surrounded by fencing, with a planted shrub visitor experience. layer on the south side of the fence, adjacent to woodland edges and open fields abutting the Lincoln LLCT’s goals for the site include expanding public Public Schools property. The site is situated on the education and programming; access to the location, northernmost portion of a 10.2-acre site owned and therefore, needs to be more clear and welcoming. protected by LLCT. The soils are mesic and nearly The meadow is currently surrounded by an 8 ft. tall all of the site is in full sun. chain link fence, with only one gate for entry, sit- uated on the northern side. The fence was initially Since 2016, LLCT has managed the site for native installed to prevent deer browse and to deter dog pollinators by direct seeding and planting a variety of forbs, graminoids and shrubs. Approximately 25- 35% of the fenced in meadow remains as non-native grasses and common weeds. After an initial survey of plant species diversity on the site by Evan Abramson and Adam Kohl of Landscape Interactions in 2019, Dr. Gegear sur- veyed the site for bumblebees and at-risk butterflies multiple times in 2020. While pollinator populations at the site were categorized as “high abundance, high diversity” by Dr. Gegear, a lot of room remains for improvement, not only in native plant species diver- sity (early season pollen sources and host plants in 38 LINCOLN POLLINATOR ACTION PLAN Off-Site Emergent Wetland Lincoln Public School Parking Lot PASTURE Path to Site walkers from allowing their dogs off leash. -
Task Force on Landscape Heritage and Plant Diversity Has Determined Initial Designations
THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL TASK FORCE ON LANDSCAPE HERITAGE & PLANT DIVERSITY nd 2 EDITION APPROVED BY THE CHANCELLORS BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS COMMITTEE February, 2005 This report is the product of a more than one-year-long effort from concerned members of the University of North Carolina community to ensure that the culturally, historically, and ecologically significant trees and landscaped spaces of the Chapel Hill campus are preserved and maintained in a manner befitting their beauty and grandeur. At the time of this writing, Carolina is in the middle of the most significant building and renovation period in its history. Such a program poses many significant challenges to the survival and well-being of our cherished trees and landscapes. This report attempts to identify, promote awareness, and provide guidelines for both the protection and enhancement of the grounds of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Furthermore, this report is intended to work within the framework of two earlier documents that help guide development of the campus: the 2002 UNC Master Plan and the 1997 Report of the Chancellor’s Task Force on Intellectual Climate at UNC. We hope that members of the university community as well as outside consultants and contractors will find this information both useful and pertinent. The Taskforce on Landscape Heritage and Plant Diversity 1 This report is the product of a more than one-year-long effort from concerned members of the University of North Carolina community to ensure that the culturally, historically, and ecologically significant trees and landscaped spaces of the Chapel Hill campus are preserved and maintained in a manner befitting their beauty and grandeur. -
Native Alternatives to Nonnative, Pest Plants
Native Alternatives to Non-Native Pest Plants Steve Sanchez–Hughes,Good,O’Leary & Ryan, Inc. Ailanthus altissima, Tree-of-heaven- Prolific seed production and a wonderful winged dispersal system helped this tree spread into many urban situations. Not offered in the trade anymore and I doubt planted much on purpose. Alternative: Juglans nigra, Black Walnut–The texture of Black Walnut closely mimics that of the Tree-of-heaven and they grow to roughly the same size. The fruit of Black Walnut, however, may be considered a nuisance to some. Albizia julibrissin, Mimosa- Prolific self-seeder along woodland edges Alternatives: Amorpha fruticosa, Leadplant- This plant is native throughout the eastern United States. It usually is found along large streams and rivers where it often flooded. It has a lacy foliage much like mimosa, however its size is much smaller, only reaching 15-25’.The small purple flowers in late spring are not as showy as mimosa but are interesting in their own right. Pinckneya pubens, Georgia Feverbark Tree–If you like mimosa as a pink summer flowering tree, look no further than this tree. Found in the wetlands of our coastal plain, Georgia Feverbark has unique Poinsettia-like pink bracts that stick around for days after the flower finishes. Robinia hispida, Rose-acacia Locust–This nice spring flowering small tree or large shrub is a relative of mimosa. It has pinnate leaves and pink blooms, but it also has the tendency to sucker. Firmiana simplex, Chinese Parasol Tree–Self-seeder, worse in sandy soils such as those found around Natchez, MS, where this plant is quite the weed.