DOCSLIB.ORG

D4.2.1 Review of the Knowledge of the Target Species at the Selected

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
D4.2.1 Review of the Knowledge of the Target Species at the Selected ECOlogical observing System in the Adriatic Sea: oceanographic observations for biodiversity Priority Axis 3: Environment and cultural heritage Specific Objective 3.2: Contribute to protect and restore biodiversity D4.2.1 Review of the knowledge of the target species at the selected Natura 2000 sites WP4 – Establishing the Ecological Observing System in the Adriatic Sea (ECOAdS) A4.2 – Integration of ecological observing system with Natura 2000 target species PP5 Blue World Institute / Jure Miočić-Stošić, Grgur Pleslić Other involved partners: PP1, PP4, PP6, PP8 Final Public 29th June 2020 European Regional Development Fund www.italy-croatia.eu/ecoss Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. ALGAE .................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Fucus (Fucus virsoides) ........................................................................................................................ 7 3. PLANTS .................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.1 Virginia saltmarsh mallow (Kosteletzkya pentacarpos) ...................................................................... 9 3.2 Venice salicorne (Salicornia veneta) ................................................................................................. 10 3.3 Slender seagrass (Cymodocea nodosa) ............................................................................................. 11 4. SPONGES ............................................................................................................................................. 14 4.1 Geody (Geodia cydonium) ................................................................................................................. 14 5. CORALS ................................................................................................................................................ 16 5.1 Cushion coral (Cladocora caespitosa) ............................................................................................... 16 6. MOLLUSCS ........................................................................................................................................... 18 6.1 Date mussel (Litophaga litophaga) ................................................................................................... 18 6.2 Noble pen shell (Pinna nobilis) .......................................................................................................... 19 7. FISH ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 7.1 Adriatic sturgeon (Acipenser naccarii) .............................................................................................. 22 7.2 Twaite shad (Alosa fallax) ................................................................................................................. 23 7.3 Adriatic dwarf goby (Knipowitschia panizzae) .................................................................................. 25 7.4 Po brook lamprey (Lampetra zanandreai) ........................................................................................ 26 7.5 Sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) .................................................................................................. 27 7.6 Canestrini’s goby (Pomatoschistus canestrinii)................................................................................. 28 8. AMPHIBIANS ....................................................................................................................................... 30 8.1 Common spadefoot (Pelobates fuscus) ............................................................................................ 30 9. REPTILES .............................................................................................................................................. 32 1 9.1 Loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) ........................................................................................... 32 9.2 European pond turtle (Emys orbicularis) .......................................................................................... 34 10. BIRDS ............................................................................................................................................... 36 10.1 Mediterranean gull (Larus melanocephalus) .............................................................................. 36 10.2 Mediterranean shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis desmarestii) ..................................................... 37 10.3 Yelkouan shearwater (Puffinus yelkouan) .................................................................................. 38 10.4 Common kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) ............................................................................................. 39 10.5 Purple heron (Ardea purpurea) ................................................................................................... 41 10.6 Squacco heron (Ardeola ralloides) .............................................................................................. 42 10.7 Eurasian bittern (Botaurus stellaris) ........................................................................................... 43 10.8 European nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus) .............................................................................. 45 10.9 Black tern (Chlidonias niger) ....................................................................................................... 46 10.10 Western marsh harrier (Circus aeruginosus) .......................................................................... 47 10.11 Hen harrier (Circus cyaneus) ................................................................................................... 48 10.12 Montagu’s harrier (Circus pygargus) ...................................................................................... 50 10.13 Great white egret (Egretta alba) ............................................................................................. 51 10.14 Little egret (Egretta garzetta) ................................................................................................. 52 10.15 Black winged stilt (Himantopus himantopus) ......................................................................... 54 10.16 Little bittern (Ixobrychus minutus) .......................................................................................... 55 10.17 Black crowned night heron (Nycticorax nycticorax) ............................................................... 57 10.18 Pigmy cormorant (Phalacrocorax pygmeus) ........................................................................... 58 10.19 Ruff (Philomachus pugnax) ..................................................................................................... 59 10.20 Greater flamingo (Phoenicopterus roseus) ............................................................................. 61 10.21 European golden plover (Pluvialis apricaria) .......................................................................... 62 10.22 Pied avocet (Recurvirostra avosetta) ...................................................................................... 63 10.23 Little tern (Sterna albifrons) .................................................................................................... 64 10.24 Common tern (Sterna hirundo) ............................................................................................... 66 2 10.25 Sandwich tern (Sterna sandvicensis) ....................................................................................... 67 10.26 Kentish plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) ............................................................................... 68 10.27 Red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio) ........................................................................................ 70 10.28 Lesser grey shrike (Lanius minor) ............................................................................................ 71 11. MAMMALS ...................................................................................................................................... 73 11.1 Common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) ..................................................................... 73 12. CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................................. 78 13. LITERATURE ..................................................................................................................................... 84 14. ANNEXES ......................................................................................................................................... 96 3 1. INTRODUCTION This review aims to summarize currently available knowledge of target species at six Natura 2000 sites in the Adriatic Sea that were selected as case studies within the project ECOSS. The sites included are: Trezze San Pietro e Bardelli (IT3330009), Delta del Po (IT3270017 and IT3270023; two sites geographically overlapping and thus here combined), Tegnùe di Chioggia (IT3250047), Cres-Lošinj (HR3000161), Vis (HR3000469) and Malostonski Bay (HR4000015). For most of the Natura 2000 sites, the review is given for species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Material
    Alcedo atthis (Common Kingfisher) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Alcedo atthis (Common Kingfisher) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4
    [Show full text]
  • INDUS ECOREGION (English)
    INDUS REGION It is identied amongst the 40 biologically richest ecoregions in the world. It harbours riverine forests along the River, mangrove forests in the coastal areas while desert ecosystems occupy the periphery of the ecoregion. It covers approximately 65% of the province of Sindh and occupies 18 districts of Sindh while a small northwestern part of the ecoregion extends slightly into Baluchistan. 01 NILGAI The nilgai or blue bull is the largest Asian antelope and is endemic to the Indian subcontinent. The short coat is yellow-brown in females and gradually turns blue-grey in males as they mature. There are white spots on the edges of the lips and throat. Males have 8-10 inches long horns which are straight and tilted slightly forwards. As herbivores, the nilgai prefer grasses and herbs; woody plants are commonly eaten in the dry tropical forests of India. Conservation status: Least Concern FUN FACT The nilgai is mainly diurnal (work in daytime) and more active in early morning and late afternoon. 02 ALEXANDRINE PARAKEET The Alexandrine parakeet is a medium-sized parrot named after Alexander the Great, who transported numerous birds from Punjab to various European and Mediterranean countries. Large Indian parakeet is one of the species found in Eastern Afghanistan, Pakistan, North India, Central India, East India, Nepal, and Bhutan. Conservation Status: Near Threatened Adult males have a broader black stripe across the lower cheek. It eats a variety of wild and cultivated seeds, buds, flowers, fruits, and nuts. Flocks can cause extensive damage to ripening fruits and crops like maize and jowar.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Gunung Tambora, Sumbawa, Indonesia: Effects of Altitude, the 1815 Cataclysmic Volcanic Eruption and Trade
    FORKTAIL 18 (2002): 49–61 Birds of Gunung Tambora, Sumbawa, Indonesia: effects of altitude, the 1815 cataclysmic volcanic eruption and trade COLIN R. TRAINOR In June-July 2000, a 10-day avifaunal survey on Gunung Tambora (2,850 m, site of the greatest volcanic eruption in recorded history), revealed an extraordinary mountain with a rather ordinary Sumbawan avifauna: low in total species number, with all species except two oriental montane specialists (Sunda Bush Warbler Cettia vulcania and Lesser Shortwing Brachypteryx leucophrys) occurring widely elsewhere on Sumbawa. Only 11 of 19 restricted-range bird species known for Sumbawa were recorded, with several exceptional absences speculated to result from the eruption. These included: Flores Green Pigeon Treron floris, Russet-capped Tesia Tesia everetti, Bare-throated Whistler Pachycephala nudigula, Flame-breasted Sunbird Nectarinia solaris, Yellow-browed White- eye Lophozosterops superciliaris and Scaly-crowned Honeyeater Lichmera lombokia. All 11 resticted- range species occurred at 1,200-1,600 m, and ten were found above 1,600 m, highlighting the conservation significance of hill and montane habitat. Populations of the Yellow-crested Cockatoo Cacatua sulphurea, Hill Myna Gracula religiosa, Chestnut-backed Thrush Zoothera dohertyi and Chestnut-capped Thrush Zoothera interpres have been greatly reduced by bird trade and hunting in the Tambora Important Bird Area, as has occurred through much of Nusa Tenggara. ‘in its fury, the eruption spared, of the inhabitants, not a although in other places some vegetation had re- single person, of the fauna, not a worm, of the flora, not a established (Vetter 1820 quoted in de Jong Boers 1995). blade of grass’ Francis (1831) in de Jong Boers (1995), Nine years after the eruption the former kingdoms of referring to the 1815 Tambora eruption.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Birds in the Recent Fossil Record of Britain and Northwest Europe John R
    Wetland birds in the recent fossil record of Britain and northwest Europe John R. Stewart 18. Dalmatian Pelican Pelecanus crispus, Deep Bay, Mai Po, Hong Kong, February 1995. Geological evidence suggests that Dalmatian Pelicans bred in Britain, and in other western European countries (including The Netherlands and Denmark), prior to and during the Iron Age. Ray Tipper. ABSTRACT Wetland habitats in Britain and other parts of western Europe have been severely depleted during the latter part of the Holocene owing principally to drainage and land reclamation. Changes in the distribution of a number of wetland bird species can be gauged from archaeological and geological site records of larger birds, whose remains are generally better preserved. Key species are discussed here, including a heron Nycticorax fenensis and a crane Grus primigenia, two extinct species named on possibly uncertain fossil evidence. We can let our minds wander back to the misty realms of fifteen hundred years ago, to a wonderful Britain which was alive with bird song from coast to coast, which sheltered wolves, bears and boars in its dark woodlands, cranes in its marshes, bustards on its heaths and beavers by its streams, and we can visualize the great pink pelican sweeping on its huge pinions over the reedy waterways which then penetrated by secret paths into the very heart of what is now Somerset. (Whitlock, 1953) © British Birds 97 • January 2004 • 33-43 33 Wetland birds in the recent fossil record f all the major habitats in northwest species, including Mute Swan Cygnus olor and Europe, wetlands may have been the Common Crane, may have become physically Omost severely depleted during the smaller owing to habitat impoverishment.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Biology of Blue-Eared Kingfisher Alcedo Meninting Sachin Balkrishna Palkar
    PALKAR: Blue-eared Kingfisher 85 Breeding biology of Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting Sachin Balkrishna Palkar Palkar, S. B., 2016. Breeding biology of Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting. Indian BIRDS 11 (4): 85–90. Sachin Balkrishna Palkar, Near D. B. J. College Gymkhana, Sathyabhama Sadan, House No. 100, Mumbai–Goa highway, Chiplun 415605, Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra, India. E-mail: [email protected] Manuscript received on 30 November 2015. Abstract The breeding biology of the Blue-eared Kingfisher Alcedo meninting was studied in Ratnagiri District, Maharashtra, India, between 2012 and 2015. Thirteen clutches of four pairs were studied. Its breeding season extended from June till September. Pairs excavated tunnels ranging in lengths from 18 to 30 cm, with nest entrance diameters varying from 5.3 to 6.0 cm. The same pair probably reuse a nest across years. A typical clutch comprised six eggs. The incubation period was 21 days (20–23 days), while fledgling period was 23 days (20–27 days). Almost 40% of the nests were double-brooded, which ratio probably depends on the strength of the monsoon. Of 75 eggs laid, 66 hatched (88%), of which 60 fledged (90.9%; a remarkable breeding success of 80%. Introduction and not phillipsi. It is also found in the Andaman Islands (A. The Blue-eared KingfisherAlcedo meninting [113, 114] is m. rufiagastra), where it is, apparently, more abundant than morphologically similar to the Common KingfisherA. atthis but the Common Kingfisher, contrary to its status elsewhere in its is neither as common, nor as widely distributed, in India, as the range (Rasmussen & Anderton 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • La Mancha, Coto Donana & Extremadura 2017
    Field Guides Tour Report Spain: La Mancha, Coto Donana & Extremadura 2017 May 6, 2017 to May 18, 2017 Chris Benesh & Godfried Schreur For our tour description, itinerary, past triplists, dates, fees, and more, please VISIT OUR TOUR PAGE. Spectacular skies greeted us during our visit to old Trujillo in the heart of Extremadura. Photo by guide Chris Benesh. So many birds around that you don´t know which to choose and observe. Do you recognize this feeling? We experienced many of these exciting moments in Spain during the Field Guides tour in May. It started straight away, on the first day, overlooking the natural lagoons of La Mancha Húmeda, where we had the chance to observe a great variety of species of ducks, grebes, terns, and passerines. The highlights here were the White-headed Duck, Eared Grebe, Red-crested Pochard, Whiskered Tern and Penduline Tit. In the National Park of Coto Donana again we found ourselves surrounded by birds: larks, bee-eaters, flamingos, Great Reed Warblers, Glossy Ibis, Squacco and Purple herons and a surprisingly well showing Little Bittern. With a bit of searching, scanning and listening we were able to also detect Red-knobbed Coot, Marbled Teal and Isabelline (Western Olivaceous) Warbler. Later in the week, close to Trujillo (Extremadura), we all enjoyed the excursion on the open, rolling plains, with Great and Little bustards, Eurasian Roller, Hoopoe, Calandra Lark, Montagu´s Harrier and many, many White Storks. For the shy Black Storks we had to wait one day more. In Monfrague National Park we discovered 3 pairs nesting on the breathtaking cliff of Peña Falcón.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamprey, Hagfish
    Agnatha - Lamprey, Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Super Class: Agnatha Hagfish Agnatha are jawless fish. Lampreys and hagfish are in this class. Members of the agnatha class are probably the earliest vertebrates. Scientists have found fossils of agnathan species from the late Cambrian Period that occurred 500 million years ago. Members of this class of fish don't have paired fins or a stomach. Adults and larvae have a notochord. A notochord is a flexible rod-like cord of cells that provides the main support for the body of an organism during its embryonic stage. A notochord is found in all chordates. Most agnathans have a skeleton made of cartilage and seven or more paired gill pockets. They have a light sensitive pineal eye. A pineal eye is a third eye in front of the pineal gland. Fertilization of eggs takes place outside the body. The lamprey looks like an eel, but it has a jawless sucking mouth that it attaches to a fish. It is a parasite and sucks tissue and fluids out of the fish it is attached to. The lamprey's mouth has a ring of cartilage that supports it and rows of horny teeth that it uses to latch on to a fish. Lampreys are found in temperate rivers and coastal seas and can range in size from 5 to 40 inches. Lampreys begin their lives as freshwater larvae. In the larval stage, lamprey usually are found on muddy river and lake bottoms where they filter feed on microorganisms. The larval stage can last as long as seven years! At the end of the larval state, the lamprey changes into an eel- like creature that swims and usually attaches itself to a fish.
    [Show full text]
  • ENSR Letter Format 1 [Temp]
    TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Study Overview.............................................................................................................................1-1 1.2. Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................1-2 2.0 Study Area...................................................................................................................................................2-1 3.0 Methods.......................................................................................................................................................3-1 3.1. Literature Review and Personal Communications ........................................................................3-1 3.2. Database Queries...........................................................................................................................3-1 3.3. Field Surveys.................................................................................................................................3-3 3.3.1. General Survey Methodology..........................................................................................3-3 3.3.2. Transect Surveys..............................................................................................................3-3 3.3.3. Northern Goshawk, Owl, and Gray Wolf Calling Surveys..............................................3-3
    [Show full text]
  • Food-Niche Differentiation in Sympatric Species of Kingfishers, The
    Ornithol Sci 7: 123–134 (2008) ORIGINAL ARTICLE Food-niche differentiation in sympatric species of kingfishers, the Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis and the Greater Pied Kingfisher Ceryle lugubris Satoe KASAHARA# and Kazuhiro KATOH Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1051 Hata-machi, Hanamigawa-ku, Chiba 262–0018, Japan Abstract The Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis and the Greater Pied Kingfisher ORNITHOLOGICAL Ceryle lugubris breed sympatrically along the Chikuma River in central Japan. These SCIENCE kingfisher species differ in body size, with the latter being much larger than the for- © The Ornithological Society mer. To understand the potential mechanisms that might play a role in food-niche dif- of Japan 2008 ferentiation between these two species, we studied their foraging ecology in the breeding seasons of 2005 and 2006. Specifically, we compared the foraging habitat, foraging behavior, and food delivered to nestlings between the two kingfishers. We video-recorded the food delivered to nestlings during the day, and our results indi- cated that these species differed in their foraging ecology in several respects: (1) Common Kingfishers caught prey at sites where the water flow was calm, while Greater Pied Kingfishers hunted at sites where the water flowed rapidly; (2) Greater Pied Kingfishers dove from a higher position and caught fish in deeper water than Common Kingfishers; and (3) Common Kingfishers preferred smaller fish than Greater Pied Kingfishers. Overall, Common Kingfishers used a wider variety of for- aging sites and food types than Greater Pied Kingfishers in the study area. As inter- specific territorially and aggressive interactions between the two species were rarely observed, the food-niche differentiation between the two species was not likely the outcome of competitive exclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Australasian Bittern (Botaurus Poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan
    Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan Wildlife Management Program No. 64 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions August 2018 Wildlife Management Program No. 64 Australasian Bittern (Botaurus poiciloptilus) Western Australian Recovery Plan August 2018 Western Australia Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Locked Bag 104, Bentley Delivery Centre, Western Australia 6983 Foreword Recovery plans are developed within the framework provided in Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Corporate Policy Statement No. 35 (Parks and Wildlife, 2015c), and the Australian Government Department of the Environment and Energy Recovery Planning Compliance Checklist for Legislative and Process Requirements (DoE, 2014). Recovery plans outline the recovery actions that are needed to urgently address those threatening processes most affecting the ongoing survival of threatened taxa or ecological communities, and begin the recovery process. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds necessary to implement actions are subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. This plan will operate for a 10 year period but will remain in force until withdrawn or replaced and will be reviewed at least at five year intervals. This recovery plan was approved by the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Western Australia. Approved recovery plans are subject
    [Show full text]
  • Ixobrychus Minutus (Common Little Bittern)
    Ixobrychus minutus (Common Little Bittern) European Red List of Birds Supplementary Material The European Union (EU27) Red List assessments were based principally on the official data reported by EU Member States to the European Commission under Article 12 of the Birds Directive in 2013-14. For the European Red List assessments, similar data were sourced from BirdLife Partners and other collaborating experts in other European countries and territories. For more information, see BirdLife International (2015). Contents Reported national population sizes and trends p. 2 Trend maps of reported national population data p. 4 Sources of reported national population data p. 6 Species factsheet bibliography p. 11 Recommended citation BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Further information http://www.birdlife.org/datazone/info/euroredlist http://www.birdlife.org/europe-and-central-asia/european-red-list-birds-0 http://www.iucnredlist.org/initiatives/europe http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/conservation/species/redlist/ Data requests and feedback To request access to these data in electronic format, provide new information, correct any errors or provide feedback, please email [email protected]. THE IUCN RED LIST OF THREATENED SPECIES™ BirdLife International (2015) European Red List of Birds Ixobrychus minutus (Common Little Bittern) Table 1. Reported national breeding population size and trends in Europe1. Country (or Population estimate Short-term population trend4 Long-term population trend4 Subspecific population (where relevant) 2 territory) Size (pairs)3 Europe (%) Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Direction5 Magnitude (%)6 Year(s) Quality Albania 100-350 <1 2002-2012 medium 0 0 2002-2012 medium - 10-20 1980-2012 poor Armenia 1,500-2,000 2 2002-2012 medium ? ? Austria 180-270 <1 2001-2012 medium 0 0 2001-2012 medium ? I.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Risk Assessment of Cane Toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT
    supervising scientist 164 report A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park RA van Dam, DJ Walden & GW Begg supervising scientist national centre for tropical wetland research This report has been prepared by staff of the Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist (eriss) as part of our commitment to the National Centre for Tropical Wetland Research Rick A van Dam Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, Locked Bag 2, Jabiru NT 0886, Australia (Present address: Sinclair Knight Merz, 100 Christie St, St Leonards NSW 2065, Australia) David J Walden Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia George W Begg Environmental Research Institute of the Supervising Scientist, GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801, Australia This report should be cited as follows: van Dam RA, Walden DJ & Begg GW 2002 A preliminary risk assessment of cane toads in Kakadu National Park Scientist Report 164, Supervising Scientist, Darwin NT The Supervising Scientist is part of Environment Australia, the environmental program of the Commonwealth Department of Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2002 Supervising Scientist Environment Australia GPO Box 461, Darwin NT 0801 Australia ISSN 1325-1554 ISBN 0 642 24370 0 This work is copyright Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Supervising Scientist Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction
    [Show full text]