Robert Fulton

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Robert Fulton Grade 4: New York State History and Government Unit 4: Change Comes to New York State Lesson 4: Inventors and Entrepreneurs Robert Fulton Robert Fulton was born in a farmhouse outside of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in 1765. At the age of 18, he left home for Philadelphia, hoping to make his fortune as an artist. The Revolutionary War was over and Philadelphia’s most important citizen was Benjamin Franklin, just returned from Europe. After painting Franklin's portrait, Fulton is said to have won his friendship and a letter of introduction to the artistic community of London, where he moved in 1786. After exhibiting in the Royal Gallery in 1791, Fulton suddenly abandoned painting for the "useful arts." His first efforts were in canal construction, but by 1793 he was designing steam- powered ships. After failing to impress the British Navy, which had its own designs, Fulton moved to France (1797). There he began working on submarines, for the French Navy to use against Britain. In 1800, Fulton himself piloted his "Nautilus" for 17 minutes in 25 feet of water. But, the French Navy was not convinced to commit to the "plunging boat." In 1804, Fulton returned to England, where he began to build submarines for the British Navy to use against the French. These included "torpedoes," (These were floating mines that were launched, rather than propelling themselves.) and in a field test Fulton blew a 300-ton ship in half. When he returned to the US after 19 years, in 1806, Fulton was considered a hero of the modern age. After he sunk a ship in a demonstration in New York Harbor, Congress sent him $5,000 for further experiments. President Jefferson requested Fulton's help in building canals for the new territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Fulton said no: he had decided to solve the steamboat problem once and for all. Fulton began a twofold effort to design a steamboat that would work. He contracted with James Watt's firm in England for a special steam engine, with a number of improvements of his own. He also used models to develop the ideal shape for his ship. "Fulton's Folly" was flat-bottomed, wall-sided, and with a square rear end, with paddle wheels midway along each side. Watt's engine was installed just in front of the wheels. The ship had fairly luxurious sleeping berths, a saloon, and a ladies' lounge. With later improvements, the total cost was about $20,000. Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Grade 4 Integrated Social Studies/English Language Arts Page 1 Revised October 2014 Grade 4: New York State History and Government Unit 4: Change Comes to New York State Lesson 4: Inventors and Entrepreneurs blog.insidetheapple.net Fulton heard "a number of sarcastic remarks" about his efforts. However, on August 17, 1807, the ship made its first voyage, from New York to Albany (32 hours) and back (30 hours). Finally, Fulton could declare, "The power of propelling boats by steam is now fully proved." Not content with scientific success, Fulton put "The North River Steamboat of Clermont" into commercial service along the same route on September 4th (cost: $7 one-way). The service ran without a hitch until mid-November, when ice in the river became a problem. Fulton obtained a patent (a legal approval so no one could steal his idea) for his steamboat (granted in just 42 days!) in 1809, with a second the next year for improvements. More importantly, the State of New York granted him an exclusive right to steamboat transport on the Hudson River. Other people ignored the patent which actually resulted in games of "chicken" and collisions in the river. Years later, the courts said he could not be the only one to have steamboats on the river. Fulton's last major undertaking was the world's first steam-powered warship. The "Demologos" was 300 feet long, 200 feet wide, 120-horsepower, and double-hulled; with the paddles between the inner and outer hulls, 44 guns on deck, and (slightly successful) underwater cannons. Although Fulton earned his last patents for this ship in 1813, the US Navy never built it. Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Grade 4 Integrated Social Studies/English Language Arts Page 2 Revised October 2014 Grade 4: New York State History and Government Unit 4: Change Comes to New York State Lesson 4: Inventors and Entrepreneurs In February of 1815, Fulton died from complications of a winter chest cold. In response, both houses of the US Congress wore mourning, and businesses in New York City closed for a day. Fulton the engineer was responsible for many new methods of construction, and Fulton the entrepreneur first made steamboat transportation a reality. Adapted from http://web.mit.edu/invent/iow/fulton.html 1. What skills did Fulton develop as a young man? How do you think this skill led to his interest and ability in boat design. 2. What boat-building experience did Fulton gain while living in France and England? 3. How did the steamboat work? 4. How fast could the Clermont travel on the Hudson River? 5. What did Fulton do after his steamboat became a success? Read the following newspaper accounts of the first successful trip of Fulton’s steamboat, the Clermont. The second account was written by Fulton himself and directed to the newspaper’s editors. After you read the accounts answer the questions below. Mr. Fulton’s ingenious [original] Steam Boat, invented with a view to the navigation of the Mississippi from New-Orleans upwards, sails to-day from the North River, near the State Prison, to Albany. The velosity [sic] of the Steam Boat is calculated at four miles a hour; it is said that it will make a progress of two against the current of the Mississippi; and if so it will certainly be a very valuable acquisition [addition] to the commerce of the Western States. New York American Citizen, August 17, 1807 Courtesy of the New York State Library Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Grade 4 Integrated Social Studies/English Language Arts Page 3 Revised October 2014 Grade 4: New York State History and Government Unit 4: Change Comes to New York State Lesson 4: Inventors and Entrepreneurs New York, August 20. To the Editor of the American Citizen: Sir, I arrived this afternoon at 4 o’clock, in the steam boat, from Albany. As the success of my experiment gives me great hope that such boats may be rendered of much importance to my country, to prevent erroneous [inaccurate] opinions, and give some satisfaction to the friends of useful improvements, you will have the goodness to publish the following statement of facts: I left New-York on Monday at 1 o’clock, and arrived at Clermont, the seat of Chancellor Livingston, at 1 o’clock on Tuesday, time 24 hours, distance 110 miles; on Wednesday I departed from the Chancellor’s at 9 in the morning, and arrived at Albany at 5 in the afternoon, distance 40 miles, time 8 hours; the sum of this is 150 miles in 32 hours, equal near 5 miles an hour. On Thursday, at 9 o’clock in the morning, I left Albany, and arrived at the Chancellor’s at 6 in the evening; I started from thence [there] at 7, and arrived at New-York on Friday at 4 in the afternoon; time 30 hours, space run through 150 miles, equals 5 miles an hour. Throughout the whole way my going and returning the wind was ahead; no advantage could be drawn from my sails – the whole has, therefore, been performed by the power of the steam engine. I am, Sir, Your most obedient, Robert Fulton. Courtesy of the New York State Library Putnam/Northern Westchester BOCES Grade 4 Integrated Social Studies/English Language Arts Page 4 Revised October 2014 .
Recommended publications
  • The River Steam Boat: a Ticking Time Bomb out of the Experience of The
    The River Steam Boat: A Ticking Time Bomb Out of the experience of the early years of the river steam boat, there emerged two architectures of steam-engine design and building. The first and for some years the predominant one was that provided by Boulton and Watt, with their low-pressure condensing steam engine. This was the architecture followed by Robert Fulton with his early success on the Hudson estuary. However, it was less than a decade after Fulton’s successful trip up the Hudson that steam engines based on designs using high pressure steam began to evolve. The result was largely to reshape the pattern of steamboat design and virtually eliminate the earlier low-pressure practices of Fulton, Boulton and Watt. The development of the high-pressure steam engine with its attendant steam boiler was governed almost entirely by practical considerations. The advantages of the simple, compact, low-cost high pressure engine over the low-pressure engine with its complicated condensing apparatus, greater size and weight, and heavy requirements of condensing water were clearly apparent and appropriate to American conditions. These conditions were (1) scarcity of capital and skilled labor, (2) scarcity of repair facilities and (3) limited scale of operation. All of these conditions, at one time or another, contributed to the fateful disasters that followed. Although explosions were by no means confined to boilers generating steam at high pressure, it was with this class of boiler that this type of operating hazard appeared in its most destructive and spectacular form. Every high-pressure boiler was in operation a storehouse of concentrated energy in the form of water and steam at high temperature confined under pressures ranging from 30 to 150 psi [i.e., pounds per square inch] and upward.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7 Interact with History
    The port of New Orleans, Louisiana, a major center for the cotton trade 1820 James Monroe is 1817 reelected president. 1824 John Construction 1819 U.S. Quincy Adams begins on the acquires Florida 1820 Congress agrees to is elected Erie Canal. from Spain. the Missouri Compromise. president. USA 1815 WORLD 1815 1820 1825 1815 Napoleon 1819 Simón 1822 Freed 1824 is defeated at Bolívar becomes U.S. slaves Mexico Waterloo. president of found Liberia on becomes Colombia. the west coast a republic. of Africa. 210 CHAPTER 7 INTERACT WITH HISTORY The year is 1828. You are a senator from a Southern state. Congress has just passed a high tax on imported cloth and iron in order to protect Northern industry. The tax will raise the cost of these goods in the South and will cause Britain to buy less cotton. Southern states hope to nullify, or cancel, such federal laws that they consider unfair. Would you support the federal or state government? Examine the Issues • What might happen if some states enforce laws and others don't? • How can Congress address the needs of different states? •What does it mean to be a nation? RESEARCH LINKS CLASSZONE.COM Visit the Chapter 7 links for more information about Balancing Nationalism and Sectionalism. 1838 1828 Removal of Andrew 1836 Martin the Cherokee 1840 William Jackson 1832 Andrew Van Buren along the Henry Harrison is elected Jackson is elected Trail of Tears is elected president. is reelected. president. begins. president. 1830 1835 1840 1830 France 1833 British 1837 Victoria 1839 Opium invades Algeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationalism and Sectionalism 1815-1860
    SECTION 15 NATIONALISM AND SECTIONALISM 1815-1860 1492 1815 1860 Present NATIONALISM Era of good feelings 1815-1825 SECTIONALISMSECTIONALISM Era ofEra good of feelingsbad feelings 1819-18601819 -1860 Industrial economy Agricultural economy (factories) Agricultural economy 211 15–1 # NATIONALISM AND THE ERA OF GOOD FEELINGS, 1815-1825 nationalism —national unity; a sense of pride and interest in one's country; a strengthening of the national government 1492 1815 - 25 Present We Americans were proud of ourselves for standing up to the mighty British Empire a second time. We seemed to have their respect—and Europe’s—and our own for the first time. All sections of the U.S.—North, South, and West—began pulling together, cooperating to build our nation. JAMES M ONROE Republican President, 1817-1825 1816—THREE LAWS STRENGTHEN THE REPUBLICANS ACQUIRE HAMILTONIAN VIEWS NATIONAL GOVERNMENT A new generation of Republicans began shifting from In 1816 Republicans enacted three laws that increased the Jeffersonian to Hamiltonian positions. Why? The war central government’s powers. Hamilton would have been showed them that a strong central government and pleased, Jefferson displeased. industrialization were essential for national security. They were sometimes called “Federalists without 1. TARIFF OF 1816 —first tariff high elitism.” enough to protect American industry 2. BANK OF THE UNITED STATES INSTEAD OF: THEY ADVOCATED: re-chartered ¨ Agrarianism ¨ Industrialism ¨ Narrow construction ¨ Broad construction 3. MILITARY EXPANSION of the Constitution
    [Show full text]
  • The First Steamboat Race
    The First Steamboat Race:Layout 1 4/18/14 10:06 AM Page 1 of the passengers. The NORTH RIVER steamboat The First (often mistakenly referred to as the Cler mont) was under the command of Capt. Andrew Bartholomew and was built by shipbuilder Charles Browne of Steamboat Race. New York City for Fulton and Livingston. She was launched on May 17, 1807 and was the first commercially successful steamboat to operate on the Hudson River (or any other river, for that mat - ter). She measured 133’ x 13’ x 7’, admeasured 182 tons, had a copper boiler, a Watt steam engine (generating 20 hp), and 3 cabins with 52 berths. She was enlarged in 1808 to measure 149’ x 17’11” x 7.’ The HOPE was a slightly larger boat, running 280 tons and measuring 149’ x Jerry Canavit, ASN 20’ x 7’7.” She had a steam engine built by Robert McQueen and her accommo - With the success of Robert Fulton’s The large crowd was present not only to dations were very similar to those of steamboats NORTH RIVER and CAR show their support for the new boat’s the NORTH RIVER. OF NEPTUNE, Captain Elihu S. Bunker challenge to the “Old Line” in defiance The challenge of the new vessels decided he would run an opposition of the present navigation monopoly, would eventually have to be addressed service line on the Hudson River from but to also witness the very popular in the courts, but before the legal Albany to New York City. He planned to Pandean Band, who after the vessel’s problems could be worked out, the do this despite the exclusive monopoly departure, began playing very popular “monopoly” would issue a more imme - held by Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Tripp Lost Three Fingers Today.” a Neighboring Mill Owner Has Just Left After Sharing Some Bad News
    324-329US8P R U3C11S1 11/26/02 2:43 PM Page 325 TERMS & NAMES 1 Early Industry and Samuel Slater Industrial Revolution Inventions factory system Lowell mills interchangeable MAIN IDEA WHY IT MATTERS NOW parts Robert Fulton New machines and factories changed The industrial development that Samuel F. B. Morse the way people lived and worked in began more than 200 years ago the late 1700s and early 1800s. continues today. ONE AMERICAN’S STORY In 1789, the Englishman Samuel Slater sailed to the United States under a false name. It was illegal for textile workers like him to leave the country. Britain wanted no other nation to copy its new machines for making thread and cloth. But Slater was going to bring the secret to America. When he got to New York, he wrote a letter to Rhode Island investor Moses Brown. A VOICE FROM THE PAST A few days ago I was informed that you wanted a manager of cotton spinning . in which business I flatter myself that I can give the greatest satisfaction, in making machinery, making good yarn, either for stockings or twist, as any that is made in England. Samuel Slater, quoted in Samuel Slater: Father of American Manufactures With Brown’s backing, Slater built the first successful water-powered Samuel Slater’s mill was textile mill in America. You will learn in Section 1 how the development located in Pawtucket, Rhode Island. of industries changed the ways Americans lived and worked. Free Enterprise and Factories The War of 1812 brought great economic changes to the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Stephenville Curriculum Document Social Studies Grade: 2 Course: Bundle (Unit) 7 Est
    STEPHENVILLE CURRICULUM DOCUMENT SOCIAL STUDIES GRADE: 2 COURSE: BUNDLE (UNIT) 7 EST. NUMBER OF DAYS: 14 UNIT 7 NAME HISTORICAL FIGURES/INVENTORS Unit Overview Narrative Our lives are better today because of the hard work, inventiveness, and risks taken by people in the past. Generalizations/Enduring Understandings Inventors and their inventions shape the way people live by making life easier and more productive. Historical figures helped shape the way we live today. Concepts Inventors and Historical figures What inventions have had the greatest impact on our lives? Why? Guiding/Essential Questions What role does failure play in achieving success? How did various historical figures help shape America today? Learning Targets Formative Assessments Summative Assessments TEKS Specifications TEKS (Grade Level) / Specifications (1) History. The student understands the historical •MLK, Jr. Day significance of landmarks and celebrations in the •Discuss his life, values, and beliefs in equality for all people. community, state, and nation. The student is expected •Declared as a national holiday to be celebrated the 3rd to: Monday in January (A) explain the significance of various community, state, and national celebrations such as Veterans Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, and Thanksgiving (3) History. The student understands how various •Autobiographies/Biographies sources provide information about the past and •Websites present. The student is expected to: •Photographs (A) identify several sources of information about a given period or event such as reference materials, biographies, newspapers, and electronic sources, (B) describe various evidence of the same time period using primary sources such as photographs, journals, and interviews. EDITED JULY 2013 (4) History. The student understands how historical Irma Rangel-first female Mexican American legislator figures, patriots, and good citizens helped shape the Thurgood Marshall-first African-American on the US community, state, and nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chippewa Riverboats
    Riverboats on the Chippewa Many different forms of boats used the Chippewa as means of transportation. Steamboats traveled up and down the river from Dunnville to as far south as Reeds Landing , at the mouth of the Chippewa River. The steamboats could not travel north of Dunnville because of the shutes located just north of the community unless the river was high. Steamboats on the Chippewa were constucted differently from those used on the deeper Mississippi. Steamboats that traveled on the Mississippi, such as the Delta Queen pictured above, were larger with deeper bottoms. The water on the Chippewa was shallower and more spread out in some areas so ships were constructed with flatter bottoms that didn't draw as much water. Captain Phil Scheckel is one of the most well known steam boat operators from the area. He built his first steamboat, "Golden Start" in 1862 and sold it to E.E. Heerman, another well-known steamboat line operator. In 1880 he built the "Phil Scheckel". The Phil Scheckel was not just a boat, it was an institution. Many stories and legends were built around it. The Phil Scheckel docked at Durand in 1897. Captain Scheckel's steamer carried mostly freight and log drive men upstream and then towed rafts full of lumber downstream to the mouth of the Chippewa and on to the Mississippi where they were towed somewhere else. There were also passengers on some of the trips. Captain Scheckel had made some trips as far as Eau Claire and Chippewa Falls, but the river was not always navigable to those points.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman
    Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman Revised Schedule Use this schedule if you are following the Five-Day Schedule. Week 31—Five-Day Schedule Date: Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Regular: pp. 8-20 pp. 21-31 pp. 32-41 pp. 42-52 pp. 53-64 Robert Fulton, ➣ o Boy Craftsman Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Week 32—Five-Day Schedule Date: Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Regular: pp. 65-73 pp. 73-77 pp. 78-87 pp. 88-95 pp. 95-100 Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Advanced: pp. 8-31 pp. 32-52 pp. 53-73 pp. 73-87 pp. 88-100 Robert Fulton, ➣ o Boy Craftsman Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Week 33—Five-Day Schedule Date: Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Regular: pp. 101-110 pp. 111-116 pp. 116-123 pp. 124-132 pp. 133-144 Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Advanced: pp. 101-116 pp. 116-132 pp. 133-155 pp. 156-175 pp. 176-end Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman ©2008 by Sonlight Curriculum, Ltd. All rights reserved. All Ltd. Sonlight Curriculum, ©2008 by Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Week 34—Five-Day Schedule Date: Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Regular: pp. 145-155 pp. 156-167 pp. 168-175 pp. 176-182 pp. 182-end Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman Reader Guide pp. 41-43 Introduction to American History, Part 1 ♦ Robert Fulton, Boy Craftsman Use this schedule if you are following the Four-Day Schedule.
    [Show full text]
  • R.M. Lintner Riverboat Collection, Ca
    Collection # M 0945, OM 0464 R.M. LINTNER RIVERBOAT COLLECTION, CA. 1860S–1990S (BULK CA. 1940S– 1960S) Collection Information Biographical/Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Series Contents Cataloging Information Processed by Kelly Gascoine February 13, 2008 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF Manuscript Materials: COLLECTION: 14 document cases, 1 card file box, 1 oversize folder Visual Materials: 32 boxes of photographs, 1 box of OVA size photographs, 1 folder of color photographs, 1 box of OVB size graphics, 2 folders of oversize graphics in flat file storage, 1 photograph album, 3 boxes of slides, 4 boxes of 4x5 acetate negatives COLLECTION Ca. 1860s–1990s (Bulk 1940s–1960s) DATES: PROVENANCE: Russell M. Lintner, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1992 RESTRICTIONS: Negatives and slides may be viewed only with the assistance of library staff. Films are not available, see Series 21 for explanation. COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED HOLDINGS: ACCESSION 1992.0232 NUMBER: NOTES: Indiana Historical Society R.M. Lintner Riverboat Collection Page 1 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL SKETCH Russell M. Linter was born 16 December 1904. A Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania resident, Lintner worked for Jones and Laughlin Steel Corporation as a General Office Purchasing Department Expeditor. His interest in steamboats began in 1933 when he visited riverboats docked at the Monongahela River Wharf. Soon Lintner was traveling downriver on packet and supply ships and photographing riverboats.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor and City Council of Baltimore V. Baltimore and Philadelphia Steamboat Company, 65 A. 353, 104 Md. 485 (Dec
    Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Baltimore and Philadelphia Steamboat Company, 65 A. 353, 104 Md. 485 (Dec. 19, 1906) Russell K. George I. INTRODUCTION Mayor and City Council of Baltimore v. Baltimore and Philadelphia Steamboat Company1 concerns the condemnation by the City of Baltimore of properties owned by the Baltimore and Philadelphia Steamboat Company ("BPSC"). After the Great Fire of 1904, which destroyed most of the Baltimore business district, the City embarked on an effort to make various urban improvements. Among other things, the City endeavored to widen Pratt Street fifty feet to the south by condemning wharves at the corner of Light and Pratt Streets that were owned and leased by the Steamboat Company.2 The Burnt District Commission awarded the Company minimal damages for the property that was condemned, and instead assessed benefits against the Company for the widening of Pratt Street.3 The Company appealed to the Baltimore City Circuit Court, where Judge Henry Stockbridge essentially reversed the Commission awards, giving the Company much more compensation than it initially received. Both the City and the Company cross- appealed. The Maryland Court of Appeals rendered its decision on December 19, 1906, affirming Stockbridge's awards. The case represents a microcosm of the improvement efforts in Baltimore following the fire. The litigation pursued by the Steamboat Company shows how property owners posed an obstacle to urban improvements. Christine Rosen discusses this in The Limits of Power: Great Fires and the Process of City Growth in America, 1 65 A. 353 (1906). 2 See Diagram, attached. 1 concluding that the progressive nature of Baltimore, which had developed prior to the fire,4 helped the City to overcome various obstacles to change, including private property ownership and political deadlock.5 In addition, the case presents issues concerning the condemnation value of waterfront property, particularly the value of certain riparian rights and the question of whether they are to be included in the fair market value of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Jeffersontown Historical Society Meetings Are Now Held on the First Monday of the Even Numbered Months of the Year
    GREATER JEFFERSONTOWN HISTORICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER December 2015 Vol. 13 Number 6 December 2015 Meeting The December meeting will be held Monday, December 7, 2015. We will meet at 7:00 P.M. in the meeting room of the Jeffersontown Library at 10635 Watterson Trail. The speaker will be Robert Prather who is going to tell us about The Strange Case of Jonathan Swift and the Real Long John Silver. Swift was a miner in the 1700s and is said to have owned the largest mansion in Alexandria, Virginia. Was the mine in Kentucky or Virginia or Tennessee? Some traditions say it is/was in Kentucky. What is the true identity of the mysterious silver miner? Sources of information provided in Kentucky history books were generally attained through verbal accounts; therefore, no written verifiable description has ever been provided to disclose the miner’s full identity. Mr. Prather says that the identity of the mysterious silver miner is revealed in his book. The author also states, “As with all folk stories and legends, only basic information regarding any particular story is passed on by verbal accounts and in most instances the stories have been embellished and altered from one telling to the next.” Swift’s mining activities took place during the late 1700’s, so how much truth has survived? The Greater Jeffersontown Historical Society meetings are now held on the first Monday of the even numbered months of the year. Everyone is encouraged to attend to help guide and grow the Society. February, 2016 Meeting As part of Black History Month along with the Jeffersontown Branch Library we will have a program presented by local author, Carridder Jones, “Voices from Historical African American Communities Near Louisville, Kentucky.” October Meeting Kadie Engstrom, Education Coordinator for the Belle of Louisville, has worked with the historic steamboat Belle of Louisville in several capacities since 1972, and has been Education Coordinator since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Fulton and the Steamboat
    Name: edHelper Robert Fulton and the Steamboat Robert Fulton was a man of vision. He became interested in the possibilities that a steamboat could create from a very early age. He was born in Pennsylvania in 1765. The story is told that he visited a family friend in 1777, and that is where his interest in steamboats began. He would have been only twelve years old. The Fulton's family friend had visited England. While he was there, he saw a demonstration of a new invention. It was a steam engine developed by a man named Watt. When he returned from England, he made his own version of the engine. His idea was to put it into a boat. Why would anyone want to put a steam engine into a boat? Maybe this explanation will help. Can you whistle? What is it that makes the whistling sound? It is air being forced through your lips. Have you ever heard a tea kettle whistle? What makes that whistling sound? Boiling water has turned to steam and that steam is forcing its way through the top of the kettle. It has quite a force. It doesn't stop when it runs out of breath like your whistle does. As long as the water is boiling and steam is being produced, that energy will last. If you have ever tried to move an object upstream against a current of water, you know that it would take a lot of energy. Inventors reasoned that if they could invent a powerful enough steam engine, they would be able to move boats up the rivers against the current as well as down with the current.
    [Show full text]