A406 / Brentfield Road / Drury Way Junction Improvement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A406 / Brentfield Road / Drury Way Junction Improvement A406 / Brentfield Road / Drury Way Junction Improvement Consultation Report November 2015 A406 / Brentfield Road / Drury Way Junction Improvement Consultation Report Contents 1 Background ................................................................................................................ 1 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 2 3 The consultation ......................................................................................................... 5 4 Overview of consultation responses ............................................................................ 8 5 Responses from members of the public .................................................................... 12 6 Responses from businesses, organisations and other stakeholders ......................... 14 7 Conclusion and next steps ........................................................................................ 21 Appendix A – Consultation material and distribution ............................................................ 23 Appendix B - List of businesses, organisations and other stakeholders consulted ............... 38 Appendix C – Summary of all issues raised ......................................................................... 43 Appendix D – Responses to issues raised........................................................................... 48 1 Background We proposed to improve the junction of the A406 North Circular Road with Brentfield Road and Drury Way in the London Borough of Brent. We proposed providing a new southbound bus lane and bus activated signals (for local buses only) in Drury Way (referred to later in this report as the bus priority facility), building a new left turn slip road from the westbound A406 North Circular Road into Brentfield Road, and signalising the pedestrian crossing across Brentfield Road. Southbound buses crossing this junction cannot currently travel from Drury Way into Brentfield Road across the A406 North Circular Road, with buses currently needing to circulate via Great Central Way and the westbound A406 North Circular Road. Northbound buses can cross directly from Brentfield Road into Drury Way. Southbound buses therefore travel approximately 0.6 miles further than northbound buses, leading to longer journey times. The junction has a history of delays and poor journey time reliability. It is the only at- grade signalised junction on the A406 North Circular Road between Staples Corner and the Hanger Lane Gyratory. It currently has insufficient capacity during the peak periods with the A406 North Circular Road westbound queues extending back to Staples Corner in the morning peak. Currently, traffic making left turns at this junction from the westbound A406 North Circular Road into Brentfield Road can hold up westbound straight-ahead traffic on the A406 North Circular Road. Pedestrians crossing Brentfield Road at this junction have to wait for a gap in traffic and the crossing is not signalised. The only right turn permitted at this junction is from Brentfield Road into the eastbound A406 North Circular Road. All left turns and straight on movements are permitted, except there is no straight-ahead movement from Drury Way into Brentfield Road. 1 2 Introduction We invited the public, road users, local residents, local businesses, organisations and other stakeholders to comment on our proposals to improve the junction of the A406 North Circular Road with Brentfield Road and Drury Way in the London Borough of Brent. 2.1 Purpose of the scheme The improvements are aimed at reducing the distance southbound buses have to travel to cross the A406 North Circular Road and smoothing the flow of traffic, reducing journey times and reducing queue lengths on the westbound A406 North Circular Road for both general traffic and buses. They also aim to improve overall safety at the junction and make it safer for pedestrians to cross Brentfield Road. They may also lead to a slight reduction in journey time for eastbound traffic and buses on the A406 North Circular Road. The improvements form part of the TfL Road Modernisation Plan and are also part of our plans to improve bus reliability and bus journey times across London. The Road Modernisation Plan is the biggest investment for a generation consisting of hundreds of projects to transform junctions, bridges, tunnels and pedestrian areas. Working with London’s boroughs, it will make our roads safer and more reliable, and London will be a better place in which to live, work and travel. 2.2 Description of the proposals We proposed the following improvements to this junction: Building a new bus lane and bus activated signals (referred to later in this report as the bus priority facility) in Drury Way to allow southbound buses to travel from Drury Way into Brentfield Road. The bus priority facility would be for local buses only, and only for the straight ahead movement. Coaches and cycles would not be permitted to use this facility Building a new left turn slip road from the westbound A406 North Circular Road into Brentfield Road Signalising the pedestrian crossing across Brentfield Road To allow the above improvements we would also need to: Enlarge the traffic island at the entrance of Drury Way, change the road layout in Drury Way southbound and narrow part of Drury Way northbound. This is to allow us to construct the new bus lane through the island while providing space for pedestrian crossing facilities. The existing signalised pedestrian crossings in Drury Way would be moved south slightly, with a new signalised pedestrian crossing provided across the exit from the new bus lane. We would provide pedestrian guardrail on both parts of the enlarged island. The walking distance to 2 cross Drury Way would be increased and we would need to remove the existing trees on the island Realign the footway and build a new traffic island and signalised pedestrian crossing on the south east corner of the junction. This is to allow us to build the new left turn slip road. We would provide pedestrian guardrail on the new island. We would also build out slightly the footway on the west side of Brentfield Road. Although the overall walking distance to cross Brentfield Road would be slightly increased, we aim to make this crossing safer. We would retain the existing access to the rear of properties on the south east side of the junction but would need to realign the vehicle crossover from the A406 North Circular Road Move southbound bus stop D in Brentfield Road, near Kingfisher Way, a short distance to the south. This is to reduce the impact of traffic building up behind buses at this stop towards the junction with the A406 North Circular Road We also proposed to: Provide new / replacement traffic signal warning signs on the A406 North Circular Road approaches to the junction in both directions Provide new signs, carriageway markings and bollards as required There would be no change to permitted / banned turns, except the introduction of the new local bus only movement from Drury Way into Brentfield Road The junction would operate in a similar way to the current situation. The new straight on local bus only movement from Drury Way would operate at the same time as traffic from Brentfield Road 3 2.3 Plan of proposed improvements 4 3 The consultation The consultation ran for a seven week period from 16 February 2015 to 5 April 2015. The original closing date was 29 March 2015 but we extended this by one week to allow time to respond for some businesses and organisations whom we contacted later. A small number of responses received after the closing date were included. The consultation was designed to help inform and shape our final decision. We wanted to understand the community’s opinions about our proposals to improve this junction. The objectives of the consultation were: To provide easily-understandable information about our proposals and allow consultees to respond To understand the level of support or opposition for our proposals To understand any issues of which we were not previously aware that might affect our proposals To understand concerns and objections To allow consultees to make suggestions To help inform our decision making process To inform where possible the detailed design of these improvements The potential outcomes of the consultation are: We decide the consultation raises no issues that should prevent us from proceeding with the scheme as proposed We modify the scheme in response to issues raised in the consultation We abandon the scheme as a result of issues raised in the consultation 3.1 Who we consulted We consulted the following: Local residents and businesses Local nurseries, schools and higher and further education establishments Pedestrians Cyclists Bus users (who use certain routes passing through the junction) Oyster card holders Congestion Charge customers Commercial drivers Coach operators Cycling and road user organisations Local disability organisations Local residents associations and community groups Local religious organisations and places of worship London Borough of Brent cabinet member, ward councillors and officers Members of Parliament London Assembly Members London TravelWatch 5 Metropolitan Police Other external stakeholders including national and London-wide bodies A list of the businesses, organisations and other stakeholders we consulted is shown in Appendix B and a summary of responses received from
Recommended publications
  • Hanger Lane, London W5
    HANGER LANE, LONDON W5 HANGER LANE, LONDON W5 West World offers an excellent opportunity for office occupiers to take space in a prominent building with excellent road/London Underground access. The building has large open plan floorplates offering excellent occupational efficiencies. Existing occupiers include Mercedes Benz, River Island, Panduit and Lewis Trust Group. 24 hour access and security Amenities West World offers a range of amenities and services, including: a 7th floor cafe, outside seating, 24/7 access and Lift security, bike storage and refurbished Lift lobby and reception area. Lift Male WC Lift Lift Female WC Raised floors Kitchen Suspended ceilings with category II lighting Various suites and offices throughout the building 4 x 12 person lifts Suites Kitchenette From 150 To 650 sq ft Typical Floor Plate 7th floor café From 14 To 60 sq m 24 hour access and security Offices Dedicated on-site From 1,700 To 9,100 sq ft management team From 158 To 845 sq m Male and female WCs on each floor The offices have been measured on a net internal Car parking ratio at 1:600 sq ft area basis in accordance with the RICS Code Of Measuring Practice (6th edition). Indicative floor plan. Not to scale. Hanger Lane currently offers superior value for office space compared to other locations in West London and the West End. Rents are two thirds lower than the West End, and a third Hanger of surrounding markets. The arrival of the Elizabeth Line in 2019 will Lane encourage more office occupiers to West London, as connectively to Central London will £4,700.00 be greatly improved, making Hanger Lane a (cost per desk p.a.) well connected and affordable office location.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY
    Park Royal Transport Strategy LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY 2017 34. Park Royal Transport Strategy Document Title Park Royal Transport Strategy Lead Author Steer Davies Gleave Purpose of the Study Strategic assessment of the existing transport provision in Park Royal, the impact of the planned future growth and identification of the transport interventions required to mitigate those impacts. Key outputs • A review of the existing performance of transport modes in Park Royal • Analysis of future demand in Park Royal and its impact on the transport modes • Identification of six packages of interventions required to improve existing performance and to mitigate the impact of future demand on transport modes. Key recommendations Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relations to other Emerging recommendations include providing transport networks that enhance the communities they serve and help studies local business to operate and grow sustainably, both now and in the future. Relevant Local Plan • Policy SP6 (Places and Destinations) and Policy SP7 (Connecting People and Places) Policies and Chapters • Place policies P4 (Park Royal West), P5 (Old Park Royal), P6 (Park Royal Centre), P7 (North Acton and Acton Wells), P8 (Old Oak Lane and Old Oak Common Lane) and P9 (Channel Gate) • All transport chapter policies Park Royal Transport Strategy Final Report January 2016 TfL and OPDC Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Current public realm in centre of Park Royal Prepared by: Prepared for: Park Royal Transport Strategy Steer Davies Gleave TfL and OPDC Final Report 28-32 Upper Ground Windsor House / Union Street - London January 2016 London SE1 9PD +44 20 7910 5000 TfL and OPDC www.steerdaviesgleave.com Our ref: 22857301 Client ref: Task 15 Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for TfL and OPDC.
    [Show full text]
  • 38 Hallmark Trading Estate
    FOR SALE 38 Hallmark Trading Estate Unit 38 Hallmark Trading Estate, Fourth Way, Wembley HA9 0LB Industrial Freehold Building in the Heart of Wembley Park 38 Hallmark Trading Estate Industrial Freehold Building in Price £595,000 the Heart of Wembley Park Building type Industrial The property comprises a mid-terraced brick built building with pitched roof, divided over ground and S/C Details To be confirmed. mezzanine floors. The ground floor area benefits from Est. rates payable £9,960 per annum access via a manual roller shutter loading door plus a dedicated pedestrian door, W/C and office / reception Rateable value £20,750 towards the front of the building. The mezzanine benefits from good ceiling height, VAT We are advised by the dedicated loading area with access from the ground Vendors that VAT is to floor, fitted office, front and rear staircases. be added to the Sale Price of the property. The property is available with full vacant possession and could be suitable for owner occupiers or Deal type Vacant possession investors. EPC category D Size 3,632 Sq ft Marketed by: Dutch & Dutch For more information please visit: http://example.org/m/39827-38-hallmark-trading- estate-unit-38-hallmark-trading-estate 38 Hallmark Trading Estate Rare freehold in the Hallmark Industrial Estate 3 Phase power Concrete floor W/C 2 x offices Good ceiling height Security Alarm 2-3 parking spaces 38 Hallmark Trading Estate 38 Hallmark Trading Estate 38 Hallmark Trading Estate, Unit 38 Hallmark Trading Estate, Fourth Way, Wembley HA9 0LB Data provided by Google 38 Hallmark Trading Estate Floors & availability Unit Floor Size sq ft 38 Hallmark ground floor 2,050 38 Hallmark mezzanine floor 1,592 Total 3,642 Location overview The Hallmark Trading Estate is located just off Fourth Way which is part of the main one way system serving the Wembley Trading Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • 232 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    232 bus time schedule & line map 232 St Raphael's View In Website Mode The 232 bus line (St Raphael's) has 2 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) St Raphael's: 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM (2) Turnpike Lane Station: 5:25 AM - 11:55 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 232 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 232 bus arriving. Direction: St Raphael's 232 bus Time Schedule 55 stops St Raphael's Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:18 AM - 11:55 PM Monday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM Turnpike Lane Bus Station (S) Langham Road, London Tuesday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM Coleraine Road (O) Wednesday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM Walnut Mews, London Thursday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM Wood Green Shopping City (J) Friday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM High Road, London Saturday 5:30 AM - 11:55 PM Wood Green Station (H) Wood Green Bus Garage (C) 208 High Road, London 232 bus Info Haringey Civic Centre (BP) Direction: St Raphael's Stops: 55 Nightingale Road (BQ) Trip Duration: 75 min Line Summary: Turnpike Lane Bus Station (S), Arcadian Gardens (BR) Coleraine Road (O), Wood Green Shopping City (J), 314 High Road, London Wood Green Station (H), Wood Green Bus Garage (C), Haringey Civic Centre (BP), Nightingale Road Berkshire Gardens (BS) (BQ), Arcadian Gardens (BR), Berkshire Gardens (BS), Tottenhall Road (T), Palmerston Road (S), Tottenhall Road (T) Pymmes Road (GY), Warwick Road (GQ), Arnos Grove Swimming Pool, Arnos Grove Station (A), Palmerston Road (S) Ravenscraig Road (C), Betstyle Circus (D), New North Circular Road, London Southgate Station (J), Whitmore
    [Show full text]
  • London Assembly Minutes
    MINUTES Meeting: London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Date: Thursday 27 May 2021 Time: 10.00 am Place: Chamber, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA Copies of the minutes may be found at: www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/whole-assembly Present: Andrew Boff AM (Chair) Peter Fortune AM Keith Prince AM (Deputy Chairman) Neil Garratt AM Marina Ahmad AM Susan Hall AM Shaun Bailey AM Krupesh Hirani AM Elly Baker AM Joanne McCartney AM Siân Berry AM Sem Moema AM Emma Best AM Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM Hina Bokhari AM Zack Polanski AM Anne Clarke AM Nicholas Rogers AM Léonie Cooper AM Caroline Russell AM Unmesh Desai AM Dr Onkar Sahota AM Tony Devenish AM Sakina Sheikh AM Len Duvall AM City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, London SE1 2AA Enquiries: 020 7983 4100 www.london.gov.uk v1/2021 Greater London Authority London Assembly (Mayor's Question Time) Thursday 27 May 2021 1 Apologies for Absence and Chair's Announcements (Item 1) 1.1 The Chair welcomed Members, officers and the public, both in the gallery and watching on the webcast, to the first Mayor’s Question Time meeting of the London Assembly following the GLA election. There were no apologies for absence. 1.2 The Chair provided an update on recent Assembly activity, including: a continued role for the Assembly in holding the Mayor to account and representing Londoners as the city rebuilt from COVID-19; a letter from the Fire, Resilience and Emergency Planning Committee to the Mayor with recommendations on how to help those living in unsafe and overcrowded homes due to cladding; and the anticipated finalisation of the Assembly’s work programme, with Members working cross-party to achieve Londoners’ priorities.
    [Show full text]
  • HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability
    HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd February 2011 HS2 London to the West Midlands: Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 HS2 London to the West Midlands Appraisal of Sustainability Main Report Volume 1 A Report for HS2 Ltd 55 Victoria Street London SW1H 0EU T 0207 944 4908 [email protected] Principal author Nick Giesler Key contributors Andrew Bryant, Andrew Mayes, Amanda Pownall, Sheenagh Mann, Sam Turner, Tony Selwyn, Yaser Ali Technical contributors Carbon and climate Matt Ireland, Tony Selwyn, Andrew Bryant, Water Environment Landscape & townscape Gillespies, Nick Giesler Cultural heritage Cotswold Archaeology Biodiversity Ecology Consultancy Ltd, Nick Giesler Water and flood risk Water Environment, Andrew Bryant Air quality John Rowland, Enan Keogh Noise and vibration John Fisk, Sasha Villa, Mark Southwood, Rob Adnitt Community integrity and accessibility Vicky Ward, Sheenagh Mann Equality Vicky Ward, Future Inclusion Health and well-being Institute for Occupational Medicine, Sheenagh Mann Socio-economics Derval Cummings, Stuart McCully, Colin Buchanan (consultants) Resources and consumption Andrew Mayes, Tony Selwyn, Sam Turner, Andrew Bryant Reviewers Mark Southwood, Stuart McCully, Roger Cooper This report was commissioned by, and prepared for HS2 Ltd and the Department for Transport (DfT) by Booz & Co. (UK) Ltd (www.booz.com) and Temple Group Ltd (www.templegroup.co.uk) ('The Consultant'). The findings and conclusions set forth in this report represent the best professional judgment of the Consultant based on information made available to it. The Consultant has relied on, and not independently verified, data provided to it by such sources and on secondary sources of information cited in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Number of Ballot Papers Counted 174456 Name Of
    Final Results GLA 2021 ELECTIONS CONSTITUENCY MEMBER OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY RESULTS Constituency Brent & Harrow Total number of ballot papers counted 174456 Name of Candidates Name of Registered Political Party Number of Votes Recorded (if any) Anton GEORGIOU Liberal Democrats 14783 Krupesh HIRANI Labour and Co-operative Party 77782 Ian Jeffrey PRICE ReformUK - London Deserves 3916 Better Molly Irene SAMUEL-LEPORT Conservative Party Candidate 56560 Emma Jane WALLACE Green Party 17472 Total number of good votes 170513 The number of ballot papers rejected was as follows:- (a) Unmarked 3412 (b) Uncertain 137 (c) Voting for too many 391 (d) Writing identifying voter 3 (e) Want of official mark 0 Total number of Rejected ballots 3943 System Logged Electorate 426373 Turnout 40% Page 1 of 1 Generated On: 07/05/2021 19:44:38 Final Results GLA 2021 ELECTIONS LONDON-WIDE ASSEMBLY MEMBER - LONDON MEMBER (AT CONSTITUENCY LEVEL) Constituency Brent & Harrow Total number of ballot papers counted 174500 Name of Registered Political Party or Independent Votes Animal Welfare Party - People, Animals, Environment (Animal Welfare 3018 Party - People, Animals, Environment) Christian Peoples Alliance 2271 Communist Party of Britain 599 Conservatives 60269 Green Party 14127 Heritage Party - Free Speech and Liberty (Heritage Party - Free Speech 677 and Liberty) Labour Party (Labour Party) 66701 Let London Live (Let London Live) 1120 Liberal Democrats 8831 Londependence (Londependence ) 418 London Real Party 1325 National Liberal Party - Self-determination for
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Committee 20/06/2018 Schedule Item No. 01
    Planning Committee 20/06/2018 Schedule Item No. 01 Ref: 174485FUL Address: Hanger Lane Gyratory, Hanger Lane W5 1DL Ward: Hanger Lane Proposal: Demolition of existing structure and construction of a part 7, 9 and 13 storey building with double basement for use as student accommodation (use class sui generis) comprising up to 565 bedrooms, ancillary student facilities including study areas and education facilities, amenity roof terrace, cycle parking, plant, access and servicing, landscaping and public realm, and basement/ground floor retail/café/restaurant (class A1/A3) and gymnasium (class D2) commercial units. Drawing numbers: For full list of plans/supporting documents see condition 2. Type of Application: Full Application - Major Application Received: 05/09/2017 Revised February - June 2018 Report by: Steve Austin Recommendation: Grant planning permission subject to: 1. Stage II referral to the Mayor of London; 2. Section 106 Agreement; and 3. Planning Conditions of Consent. Executive Summary: This is a detailed planning application for development of land inside the Hanger Lane Gyratory North of Hanger Lane Undergound Station and Undergound railway lines. The Application Site is currently occupied by a single storey storage building and hard standing. Part of the Site is designated ‘Green Corridor` and SINC. Part of the Site is also subject to HS2 safeguarding. The site is in an accessible location with a PTAL 4/5 rating ‘Good’. The surrounding area contains a mix of land uses including residential, retail and commercial uses. Hanger Lane Underground Station is locally listed and there are two conservation areas nearby to the South/ West. The proposal is for student accommodation with ancillary teaching and commercial uses.
    [Show full text]
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for GLA Oversight Committee, 25/05
    AGENDA Meeting: GLA Oversight Committee Date: Tuesday 25 May 2021 Time: 10.00 am Place: Chamber, City Hall, The Queen's Walk, London, SE1 2AA Copies of the reports and any attachments may be found on our website at www.london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/london-assembly-committees. Most meetings of the London Assembly and its Committees are webcast live on www.london.gov.uk/about-us/london-assembly/youtube and www.london.gov.uk/media-centre/london-assembly where you can also view past meetings. Members of the Committee Caroline Pidgeon MBE AM (Chair) Dr Onkar Sahota AM Susan Hall AM (Deputy Chairman) Marina Ahmad AM Len Duvall AM Emma Best AM Unmesh Desai AM Peter Fortune AM Joanne McCartney AM Caroline Russell AM Keith Prince AM A meeting of the Committee has been called by the Chair of the Committee to deal with the business listed below. Mary Harpley, Chief Officer & Proper Officer, Monday 17 May 2021 Further Information If you have questions, would like further information about the meeting or require special facilities please contact: Davena Toyinbo, Principal Committee Manager, Telephone: 0208 039 1285; Email: [email protected]. For media enquiries please contact: Aoife Nolan, External Communications Officer, Telephone: 07849 303 897; Email: [email protected]. If you have any questions about individual items please contact the author whose details are at the end of the report. This meeting will be open to the public, except for where exempt information is being discussed as noted on the agenda. The meeting will comply with applicable Government guidance and Regulations in relation to Covid-19.
    [Show full text]
  • Abbey View Mill Hill London U a Abbots Gardens East Finchley
    Street Name Locality Town Road Class Adoption Status Part Adoption Comments Abbey View Mill Hill London U A Abbots Gardens East Finchley London U A Footpath From Abbots Gardens to Deansway East Finchley London U A Footpath From Abbots Gardens to Brim Hill East Finchley London U A Abbots Road Burnt Oak Edgware U A Abbotts Road New Barnet Barnet U A Abercorn Close Mill Hill London U A Abercorn Road Mill Hill London U A Aberdare Gardens Mill Hill London U A Abingdon Road Finchley London U A Accommodation Road Golders Green London U U Acklington Drive Colindale London U A Acton Walk Whetstone London U U Footpath from Acklington Drive to Valiant Walk Colindale London U U Footpath From Acklington Drive side of No12 to Valiant Path Colindale London U A Ada Close New Southgate London U U Adam Close Mill Hill London U U Adams Close Finchley London U U Addington Drive North Finchley London U A Addison Way Golders Green London U A Footpath from Addison Way to Littlewood Open Space Golders Green London U A Adrian Avenue Cricklewood London U U Adrian Close Underhill Barnet U U Aerodrome Road Colindale London U A Footpath from Aerodrome Road to Colindeep Lane Colindale London U A Aeroville Colindale London U U Agnesfield Close North Finchley London U A Agnesfield Close Private Part North Finchley London U U Aitken Road Underhill Barnet U A Footpath from Aitken Road to Well Road Underhill Barnet U A Ajax Avenue Colindale London U A Alan Drive Underhill Barnet U A Alba Gardens Golders Green London U A Albemarle Road East Barnet Barnet U A Alberon Gardens
    [Show full text]
  • In Your Area 2: North Acton to Northolt �
    LOCAL AREA High Speed Rail Consultation In Your Area 2: North Acton to Northolt � Find out here about: • what is proposed between North Acton and Northolt; • what this means for people living in and around North Acton and Northolt; • what would happen during construction; and • possible additional benefits for the local area. What is proposed between Long Drive. Just beyond Northolt station the North Acton to Northolt route allows for a junction so that a branch connection to Heathrow airport could be After leaving Old Oak Common Station, the constructed in the future. proposed route would pass through a short tunnel, emerging to the west of Acton What this means for people living Cemetery. It would then follow the existing rail in and around North Acton and line between Park Royal and Northolt Junction, Northolt keeping as close to the existing railway as possible, and replacing two existing, but rarely Tunnels used, conventional tracks with high speed lines. The proposed tunnel from Old Oak Common West of Hanger Lane, the proposed route station would run from the west end of the would pass over the River Brent on a new station until it reaches the surface to the west viaduct. Through Perivale it would be to the of Acton Cemetery. This section of tunnel is north of, and largely at the same height as, the mostly beneath an industrial area, but, for a existing rail lines, mostly on embankment. short length immediately to the west of the proposed Old Oak Common station, the Passing through Greenford, the proposed route tunnels pass around 15m below a group of would cross the Grand Union Canal on a new residential properties.
    [Show full text]
  • OOC Transport Study.Pdf
    Transport for London Old Oak Common Strategic Transport Study February 2015 MAYOR OF LONDON Transport for London Old Oak Common Strategic Transport Study OAPF consultation February 2015 Acknowledgements Transport for London London Boroughs of Hammersmith and Fulham, Brent and Ealing Greater London Authority Transport for London Old Oak Common: Strategic Transport Study Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................... 8 2 Old Oak Common Opportunity Area .............................................................. 18 3 Policy context .............................................................................................. 22 4 Existing transport infrastructure and issues .................................................... 27 5 Planned and committed developments .......................................................... 55 6 Future year (2031) without development ........................................................ 57 7 Future Year (2031) with development ............................................................ 75 8 Proposed transport interventions to support future development ................... 93 9 Transport strategy performance ................................................................... 121 10 Implementation .......................................................................................... 150 11 Conclusions and next steps .......................................................................... 153 Transport for London Old Oak
    [Show full text]