DOCSLIB.ORG

Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment & Final Environmental Impact Statement (DRECP PLUPA/FEIS)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment & Final Environmental Impact Statement (DRECP PLUPA/FEIS) Director’s Protest Resolution Report Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan Proposed Land Use Plan Amendment & Final Environmental Impact Statement (DRECP PLUPA/FEIS) September 14, 2016 1 Contents Reader’s Guide................................................................................................................................ 3 List of Commonly Used Acronyms ................................................................................................ 4 Protesting Party Index ..................................................................................................................... 5 Issue Topics and Responses ............................................................................................................ 8 NEPA – Range of Alternatives ................................................................................................... 8 NEPA – Best Available Information ......................................................................................... 18 NEPA – Purpose and Need ....................................................................................................... 22 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - General ......................................................................................... 28 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Air ................................................................................................ 42 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Soil ............................................................................................... 48 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Prime Farmlands ......................................................................... 52 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Cultural ........................................................................................ 54 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Livestock Grazing ....................................................................... 58 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Recreation ................................................................................... 60 NEPA – Impacts Analysis – Socioeconomics & Environmental Justice .................................. 64 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Water ............................................................................................ 67 NEPA – Impacts Analysis - Wildlife ........................................................................................ 71 NEPA – Mitigation - General.................................................................................................... 78 NEPA – Mitigation – Air and Water ......................................................................................... 83 NEPA – Mitigation - Wildlife ................................................................................................... 87 NEPA – Mitigation – Cultural .................................................................................................. 91 NEPA – Supplementation ......................................................................................................... 93 NEPA – Response to Comments ............................................................................................. 102 NEPA – Public Participation ................................................................................................... 112 NEPA – Environmental Review and Consultation ................................................................. 123 Secretarial Order 3330 ............................................................................................................ 126 Government-to-Government Consultation .............................................................................. 130 National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) ........................................................................... 135 FLPMA.................................................................................................................................... 141 California Desert Conservation Area (CDCA) ....................................................................... 150 Consistency with Other Plans ................................................................................................. 164 Cooperation & Coordination ................................................................................................... 172 Protest Process......................................................................................................................... 176 General Mining Law ............................................................................................................... 178 Endangered Species Act .......................................................................................................... 182 National Conservation Lands – National Trails System ......................................................... 186 National Conservation Lands – Omnibus Act......................................................................... 190 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ............................................................................... 202 BLM Visual Resource Management Policy ............................................................................ 215 BLM Special Status Species Policy ........................................................................................ 219 Lands with Wilderness Characteristics ................................................................................... 223 Travel Management................................................................................................................. 233 Clarification Issues .................................................................................................................. 236 2 Reader’s Guide How do I read the Report? The Director’s Protest Resolution Report is divided into sections, each with a topic heading, excerpts from individual protest letters, a summary statement (as necessary), and the Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM) response to the summary statement. Report Snapshot Topic heading Issue Topics and Responses NEPA Submission number Issue Number: PP-CA-DRECP-15-120-10 Protest issue number Organization: The Forest Initiative Protesting organization Protester: John Smith Protester’s name Direct quote taken from the submission Issue Excerpt Text: Rather than analyze these potential impacts, as required by NEPA, BLM postpones analysis of renewable energy development projects to a future case-by-case analysis. Summary General statement summarizing the issue excerpts (optional). There is inadequate NEPA analysis in the PRMP/FEIS for renewable energy projects. Response BLM’s response to the summary statement or issue excerpt if there is no summary. Specific renewable energy projects are implementation-level decisions rather than RMP-level decisions. Upon receipt of an application for a renewable energy project, the BLM would require a site-specific NEPA analysis of the proposal before actions could be approved (FEIS Section 2.5.2, p. 2- 137). Project specific impacts would be analyzed at that time (including impacts to surrounding properties), along with the identification of possible alternatives and mitigation measures. How do I find my Protest Issues and Responses? 1. Find your submission number on the protesting party index which is organized by case file number (numbered as received). 2. In Adobe Reader search the report for your name, organization or submission number (do not include the issue number). Key word or topic searches may also be useful. 3 List of Commonly Used Acronyms ACEC Area of Critical Environmental HCP Habitat Conservation Plan Concern IB Information Bulletin ACHP Advisory Council on Historic IM Instruction Memorandum Preservation KOP Key Observation Points ACP Advanced Conservation Practice LUPA Land Use Plan Amendment APE Area of Potential Effects MOU Memorandum of Understanding BA Biological Assessment NAE Native American Element BLM Bureau of Land Management NEPA National Environmental Policy BMP Best Management Practice Act of 1969 BO Biological Opinion NHPA National Historic Preservation CAA Clean Air Act Act of 1966, as amended CDCA California Desert Conservation NLCS* National Conservation Lands* Area NOA Notice of Availability CEQ Council on Environmental NOI Notice of Intent Quality NRHP National Register of Historic CFR Code of Federal Regulations Places CMA Conservation and Management NSO No Surface Occupancy Actions OHV Off-Highway Vehicle COA Condition of Approval PA Programmatic Agreement CSP Concentrated Solar Power PLUPA Proposed Land Use Plan CSU Controlled Surface Use Amendment CWA Clean Water Act PPA Power Purchase Agreement DLUPA/EIS REAT Renewable Energy Action Team Draft Land Use Plan Amendment RFDS Reasonably Foreseeable and Environmental Impact Development Scenario Statement RMP Resource Management Plan DFA Designated Focus Area ROD Record of Decision DM Departmental Manual ROW Right-of-Way (Department of the Interior) SO State Office DOI Department of the Interior T&E Threatened and Endangered DWMA Desert Wildlife Management Area TCA Tortoise Conservation Area EA Environmental Assessment USC United States Code EIR Environmental Impact Report USGS U.S. Geological Survey EIS Environmental Impact Statement VPL Variance Process Land EO Executive Order VRM Visual Resource Management EPA Environmental Protection WA Wilderness Area Agency WEMO West Mojave Route Network ESA Endangered Species Act Project FEIS Final Environmental Impact WSA Wilderness Study Area Statement WSR Wild and Scenic River(s) FLPMA Federal Land Policy and *National
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Special Use Provisions in Wilderness Legislation (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION Natural Resources Law Center University of Colorado School of Law 401 UCB Boulder, Colorado 80309-0401 2004 Table of Contents SPECIAL USE PROVISIONS IN WILDERNESS LEGISLATION ........................................................... 1 I. Overview ................................................................................................................................. 1 II. Specific Special Use Provisions............................................................................................. 1 A. Water Rights ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EIS-0386-DEIS-02-2007.Pdf
    Draft WWEC PEIS September 2007 DOCUMENT CONTENTS VOLUME I Executive Summary Chapter 1: Why Are Federal Agencies Proposing to Designate Energy Corridors in the West? Chapter 2: What Are the Alternatives Evaluated in This PEIS? Chapter 3: What Are the Potential Environmental Consequences of Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 4: How Are Cumulative Impacts Evaluated? Chapter 5: What Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Might Be Caused by Corridor Designation and Land Use Plan Amendment? Chapter 6: The Relationship between Local Short-Term Uses of the Environment and Long-Term Productivity Chapter 7: What Irreversible and Irretrievable Commitment of Resources Would Be Involved with Implementation of the Alternatives? Chapter 8: List of Preparers Chapter 9: References Chapter 10: Glossary VOLUME II Appendix A: Proposed Land Use Plan Amendments Appendix B: Summary of Public Scoping Comments for the Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, Designation of Energy Corridors on Federal Land in the 11 Western States (DOE/FS-0386) Appendix C: Tribal Consultation Appendix D: Federal and State Regulatory Requirements Potentially Applicable When Designating Energy Corridors Appendix E: Energy Transport Technologies and Hypothetical Energy Transport Projects Appendix F: Section 368 Corridor Parameters Appendix G: Sensitive Resource Areas That Would Be Intersected by Proposed West-wide Energy Corridors Appendix H: Geographic Information System Data Appendix I: Summary of WWEC PEIS Webcasts for Corridor Review and Revision, 6/19/06 to 4/24/07
    [Show full text]
  • National Landscape Conservation System: Wilderness Areas
    National Landscape Conservation System: Wilderness Areas State Field Office Wilderness Public Law Date Designated Units Acres AZ Gila District Aravaipa Canyon PL 101-628 8/28/1984 1 19,410 AZ Colorado River District Arrastra Mountain PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 129,800 AZ Colorado River District Aubrey Peak PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 15,400 AZ Gila District Baboquivari Peak PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 2,040 AZ Arizona Strip District Beaver Dam Mountains (3,667 in UT) PL 98-406 8/28/1984 1 15,000 AZ Phoenix District Big Horn Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 21,000 AZ Arizona Strip District Cottonwood Point PL 98-406 8/28/1984 1 6,860 AZ Gila District Coyote Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 5,100 AZ Gila District Dos Cabezas Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 11,700 AZ Colorado River District Eagletail Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 97,880 AZ Colorado River District East Cactus Plain PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 14,630 AZ Gila District Fishhooks PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 10,500 AZ Colorado River District Gibralter Mountain PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 18,790 AZ Arizona Strip District Grand Wash Cliffs PL 98-406 8/28/1984 1 37,030 AZ Colorado River District Harcuvar Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 25,050 AZ Phoenix District Harquahala Mountains PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 22,880 AZ Phoenix District Hassayampa River Canyon PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 12,300 AZ Phoenix District Hells Canyon PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 9,951 AZ Phoenix District Hummingbird Springs PL 101-628 11/28/1990 1 31,200 AZ Arizona Strip District Kanab Creek PL 98-406 8/28/1984 1 6,700 AZ Arizona
    [Show full text]
  • Stepladder Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy
    Stepladder Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy Location: The Stepladder Mountains area is located in the Mojave Desert, in San Bernardino County, to the west of the town of Havasu Lake. The Sacramento Mountains lie to the north and the Turtle Mountains lie to the south. Highway 95 lies to the east and Ward Valley lies to the west. This area abuts the existing Stepladder Mountains Wilderness area. Management Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Field Office Description: The western portion of the existing Wilderness area consists of the relatively low, elongated volcanic Stepladder Mountains. This small range extends for about 10 miles in a north-south direction. The area gently slopes eastward to the northern end of the Chemehuevi Wash and westward to Homer Wash. A significant portion of this area consists of flat bajadas and associated washes, providing excellent desert tortoise habitat. Elevations range from about 1,750 feet to about 2,650 feet. Wildlife and Plants: Species which make this area their home include the protected desert bighorn sheep and golden eagle, and the threatened desert tortoise. Other species which can be found here include the black-tailed jackrabbit, coyote, Emory's crucifixion-thorn, glandular ditaxis, ground squirrel, kangaroo rat (photo above), Le Conte's thrasher, burrowing owl, prairie falcon, quail, roadrunner, and rattlesnake. The importance of the area to the continued viability of the desert tortoise cannot be exaggerated. The area has been designated as critical habitat for the desert tortoise. Scientists have found that the region has had some of the highest tortoise population densities in the eastern Mojave Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • California Desert Protection Act of 1994
    California Desert Protection Act of 1994 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, U. S., The California Desert Protection Act July 27, 1994 of 1994 designated 44,000 acres of Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 21) entitled new wilderness in the “Nevada "An Act to designate certain lands in the California Triangle” of Death Valley National Desert as wilderness, to establish Death Valley, Joshua Park. Tree, and Mojave National Parks, and for other purposes," do pass with the following AMENDMENTS: Strike out all after the enacting clause, and insert: That this Act may be cited as the "California Desert Protection Act of 1994." FINDINGS AND POLICY SEC. 2. (a) The Congress finds and declares that-- •(1) the federally owned desert lands of Southern California constitute a public wildland resource of extraordinary and inestimable value for this and future generations; •(2) these desert wildlands display unique scenic, historical, archeological, environmental, ecological, wildlife, cultural, scientific, educational, and recreational values used and enjoyed by millions of Americans for hiking and camping, scientific study and scenic appreciation; •(3) the public land resources of the California desert now face and are increasingly threatened by adverse pressures which would impair, dilute, and destroy their public and natural values; •(4) the California desert, embracing wilderness lands, units of the National Park System, other Federal lands, State parks and other State lands, and private lands, constitutes a cohesive unit posing unique and difficult resource protection and management challenges; •(5) through designation of national monuments by Presidential proclamation, through enactment of general public land statutes (including section 601 of the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, 90 Stat.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix L, Bureau of Land Management Worksheets
    Chemehuevi Description/Location: The north edge of the unit adjoins the southern and eastern boundary of Mojave National Preserve and the Nevada border and extends south and east to the Colorado River and Riverside County. There are 3 expansions areas proposed for this ACEC. The existing ACEC and proposed ACEC expansions and NLCS lands would link and connect the protected lands in ten wilderness areas (Trilobite, Clipper Mountains, Piute Mountains, Bigelow Cholla, Dead Mountains, Old Woman Mountains, Turtle Mountains, Stepladder Mountains, Whipple Mountains, and Chemehuevi Mountains) with Mojave National Preserve. This extensive and contiguous conservation landscape would stretch from the Colorado River region to the higher East Mojave desert. Nationally Significant Values: Ecological: This area encompasses a transition zone between both Mojave and Sonoran Desert ecosystems. Chemehuevi Wash is one of the largest desert wash systems in the US portion of the Sonoran Desert. The area has some of the best desert tortoise habitat in the southeast Mojave and northeast Sonoran Deserts. The Chemehuevi Desert Wildlife Management Area was established to protect and conserve this desert tortoise habitat. The transitional ecosystem attracts a variety of birds including BLM sensitive species such as prairie falcons, gray vireo, Bendire’s thrasher, and burrowing owls. Specialized habitats include dunes for Mojave fringe‐toed lizards and roosting habitat for several bat species. Numerous rare and sensitive plants inhabit the area including Emory’s crucifixion thorn, white margined penstemon, scrub lotus, rosy two‐ toned beardtongue, as well as Cryptantha clokeyi, Ditaxis claryana, Juncus nodosus, Mentzelia tricuspis, Opuntia wigginsii, and Psorothamnus fremontii var. attenuates. Between the Clipper Mountains and the Trilobite Wilderness areas is Bonanza Spring, one of the few natural watering areas for wildlife in the Mojave Desert.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.14 Recreation
    4. Environmental Setting, Impacts, and Mitigation Measures 4.14 Recreation The purpose of this Section is to identify existing recreation opportunities within the Project area, analyze potential impacts to recreation associated with the development of the proposed Project, and identify mitigation measures that would avoid or reduce the significance of any identified impacts. Thresholds of significance for the impact analysis are derived from Appendix G of the 2011 CEQA Guidelines. 4.14.1 Environmental Setting Regional Setting The Project is located near Cadiz, California, an unincorporated community in the southeast Desert Region of San Bernardino County. The Desert Region includes a significant portion of the Mojave Desert and contains about 93 percent (18,735 square miles) of the land within San Bernardino County. The Desert Region is an assemblage of mountain ranges interspersed with long, broad valleys that often contain dry lakes.1 The County has established numerous regional and community parks in the Desert Region, supporting recreational activities including hiking, camping, picnicking, and nature trails. Table 4.14-1 lists the regional and community parks in the Desert Region. TABLE 4.14-1 COUNTY REGIONAL PARKS AND COMMUNITY PARKS IN THE DESERT REGION Parks Acreage County Regional Parks Big Morongo Regional Park 183 Calico Ghost Town Regional Park 480 Mojave Narrows Regional Park 1,100 Mojave River Forks Regional Park 840 Mojave River Forks Regional Park 2,393 Subtotal: 4,996 Community Parks Big River Park and Recreation Site 14 Covington Park 3 Midway Park 16 Pioneer Park 12 Sugarloaf Park 6 Chet Hoffman 4 Subtotal: 55 Total Regional and Community Park Acres 5,051 SOURCE: County of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County 2007 General Plan Program Final Program Environmental Impact Report, February2007, page IV-146.
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Trails National Monument Proposal
    28 36 62 Mojave Trails National 3 66 China Lake Naval Air Death Valley National Park 10 Monument Proposal Weapons Center 41 1 11 Ivanpah Bright Source Solar Project Ridgecrest 60 12 71 9 17 23 Proposed Mojave Trails National Monument Route 66 (National Trails Highway) Solar Millennium Ridgecrest Solar Project (941,000 acres) 33 32 Catellus lands account for 199,613 acres within County Boundary Spangler Hills 65 monument boundary OHV Area 17 4 Proposed Wild and Scenic River 14 Administrative/Ownership Summary of Lands Within the China Lake Proposed Mojave Trails National Monument: (in acres) 6 Naval Air 37 ACEC...................................................................................468,672 47 Renewable Energy Action Team (2,720,000 acres) 27 Weapons Center 29 Cady Mountains WSA...........................................................84,000 77 Catellus lands outside ACEC boundaries.............................103,221 5 27 Fort Irwin Other BLM Lands...............................................................285,520 BLM Solar Study Area (351,000 acres) 27 60 Of these lands less than 75,000 are less than 5% slope 27 69 NTC 8 State Lands..........................................................................32,168 Private Lands.......................................................................72,125 Fast-Track Renewable Energy Projects 27 78 70 27 6 Sand to Snow National Monument 27 25 Baker Proposed Sand to Snow National Monument (134,000 acres) 27 10 76 27 Proposed Congressionally Approved Off Highway Vehicle Areas 76
    [Show full text]
  • Turtle Mountains
    Turtle Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy Location: This area is located in the Mojave Desert, in San Bernardino County, south/southwest of the town of Havasu Lake. Located north of Hwy 62, south of the Stepladder Mountains Wilderness and Chemehuevi Valley, east of Ward Valley and west of Hwy 95. This area abuts the south end of the existing Turtle Mountains Wilderness. Management Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Field Office Description: The area ranges from broad bajadas to highly-eroded volcanic peaks, spires, and cliffs. The colorful Turtle Mountains vary from deep reds, browns, tans and grays, to blacks. The area contains the two signature Mopah Peaks; the northern most peak is a landmark known as Mexican Hat. The area has several springs and seeps. Much of the Turtle Mountain range has been designated as a National Natural Landmark in recognition of its exceptional natural values. Elevations in the area range from about 2,650 feet to about 8,900 feet. Wildlife and Plants: Species that make this area their home include the threatened desert tortoise, the protected desert bighorn sheep, the prairie falcon, golden eagle, roadrunner, Le Conte’s thrasher, Cove’s cassia (photo above), Arizona pholistoma, three-awned grama, burrowing owl, black-tailed jackrabbit, Bendire’s thrasher, kangaroo rat, Mojave fringe-toed lizard (photo above), Abrams’ spurge, Harwood’s milk-vetch, and Harwood’s eriastrum. A portion of this area lies within designated critical habitat for the desert tortoise. Additionally, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has recognized this area as a wildlife migration corridor. Vegetation Includes creosote bush-bur sage, palo verde-cactus shrub ecosystems, Colorado/Sonoran microphylla woodlands, palo verde, smoke tree, honey mesquite, and catclaw.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 207/Monday, October 26, 2020
    67818 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Proposed Rules ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION All submissions received must include 1. General Operation and Maintenance AGENCY the Docket ID No. for this rulemaking. 2. Biofouling Management Comments received may be posted 3. Oil Management 40 CFR Part 139 without change to https:// 4. Training and Education B. Discharges Incidental to the Normal [EPA–HQ–OW–2019–0482; FRL–10015–54– www.regulations.gov, including any Operation of a Vessel—Specific OW] personal information provided. For Standards detailed instructions on sending 1. Ballast Tanks RIN 2040–AF92 comments and additional information 2. Bilges on the rulemaking process, see the 3. Boilers Vessel Incidental Discharge National 4. Cathodic Protection Standards of Performance ‘‘General Information’’ heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 5. Chain Lockers 6. Decks AGENCY: Environmental Protection this document. Out of an abundance of 7. Desalination and Purification Systems Agency (EPA). caution for members of the public and 8. Elevator Pits ACTION: Proposed rule. our staff, the EPA Docket Center and 9. Exhaust Gas Emission Control Systems Reading Room are closed to the public, 10. Fire Protection Equipment SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental with limited exceptions, to reduce the 11. Gas Turbines Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing risk of transmitting COVID–19. Our 12. Graywater Systems for public comment a proposed rule Docket Center staff will continue to 13. Hulls and Associated Niche Areas under the Vessel Incidental Discharge provide remote customer service via 14. Inert Gas Systems Act that would establish national email, phone, and webform. We 15. Motor Gasoline and Compensating standards of performance for marine Systems encourage the public to submit 16.
    [Show full text]