DOCSLIB.ORG

Mojave Trails National Monument Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

28 36 62 Mojave Trails National 3 66 China Lake Naval Air Death Valley National Park 10 Monument Proposal Weapons Center 41 1 11 Ivanpah Bright Source Solar Project Ridgecrest 60 12 71 9 17 23 Proposed Mojave Trails National Monument Route 66 (National Trails Highway) Solar Millennium Ridgecrest Solar Project (941,000 acres) 33 32 Catellus lands account for 199,613 acres within County Boundary Spangler Hills 65 monument boundary OHV Area 17 4 Proposed Wild and Scenic River 14 Administrative/Ownership Summary of Lands Within the China Lake Proposed Mojave Trails National Monument: (in acres) 6 Naval Air 37 ACEC...................................................................................468,672 47 Renewable Energy Action Team (2,720,000 acres) 27 Weapons Center 29 Cady Mountains WSA...........................................................84,000 77 Catellus lands outside ACEC boundaries.............................103,221 5 27 Fort Irwin Other BLM Lands...............................................................285,520 BLM Solar Study Area (351,000 acres) 27 60 Of these lands less than 75,000 are less than 5% slope 27 69 NTC 8 State Lands..........................................................................32,168 Private Lands.......................................................................72,125 Fast-Track Renewable Energy Projects 27 78 70 27 6 Sand to Snow National Monument 27 25 Baker Proposed Sand to Snow National Monument (134,000 acres) 27 10 76 27 Proposed Congressionally Approved Off Highway Vehicle Areas 76 21 7 21 El Mirage NOHV Area (25,678 acres) 70 Mojave National Preserve Johnson Valley NOHV Area (194,092 acres) 22 5 Rasor Rasor NOHV Area (25,316 acres) 19 San Bernardino County OHV Area Stoddard Valley NOHV Area (50,789 acres) 21 - Dead Spangler Hills NOHV Area (57,056 acres) 1 44 40 30 58 40 5 70 Mountains 52 44 Kelso 44 22 38 The Wildlands Conservancy Acquisitions 38 56 11 44 TWC Funded Acquisitions Edwards 44 44 Goffs 44 Stirling Energy Solar One Project Air Force Base Barstow 15 - Kelso Dunes 9 20 - Bigelow Other TWC Donated Lands (10,239 acres) Proposed Mojave Trails 27 Cholla Needles Joshua Tree National Park (19,209 acres) AES Daggett Ridge Wind Energy Project National Monument Garden 45 TWC Preserves 16 - Bristol 13 55 Mountains 18 - Clipper Mountains 19 Piute Mountains Other Lands 43 Stoddard Valley OHV Area National Park Service Santa Rosa/San Jacinto 50 59 14 National Monument Ludlow 44 45 El Mirage State Lands 1 BLM Wilderness OHV Area 17 - Trilobite 22 - Chemehuevi Military 1 Area of Critical Environmental Concern Bureau of Land Management Proposed Wilderness Victorville 7 Potential Wilderness National Forest 74 4 39 24 - Stepladder Mountains Johnson Valley Proposed Transfer to NPS Granite Mountain Wind Energy Project Other Conservation Lands OHV Area 26 - Old Woman Mountains Twentynine Palms Map does not show private properties within Lake government-protected areas. Chevron Energy Systems Lucerne Valley Solar Project Marine Corps Base Havasu 68 13 City 25 - Turtle Mountains BLM Wilderness Areas 35 27 - Cadiz Dunes 12 1 Owens Peak 13 Newberry Mountains 25 Turtle Mountains 37 Palen/McCoy 73 72 2 Kiavah 14 Rodman Mountains 26 Old Woman Mountains 38 Rice Valley De San Bernardino 46 ep 23 3 Bright Star 15 Kelso Dunes 27 Cadiz Dunes 79 39 Riverside Mountains C National Forest r 30 Angeles e ek 4 El Paso Mountains 16 Bristol Mountains 28 Sheephole Valley e e 40 Big Maria Mountains k r National Forest Holcomb C 5 Golden Valley 17 Trilobite 29 Cleghorn Lakes 41 Palo Verde Mountains 6 Grass Valley 18 Clipper Mountains 30 Bighorn Mountains 42 Indian Pass Pioneertown 29 7 Black Mountain 19 Piute Mountains 31 San Gorgonio San 30 Parker 43 North Algodones Dunes Gabrie San Mountains 20 Bigelow Cholla Garden l Mountains Ber 8 Hollow Hills 32 Santa Rosa 44 Fish Creek Mountains Wilderness nard Proposed Sand to Snow Preserve 28 - Sheephole Valley ino 9 Kingston Range 21 Dead Mountains 33 Mecca Hills 45 coyote Mountains Wilderness M National Monument Chemehuevi ou 10 N. Mesquite Mountains 22 34 Orocopia Mountains 46 Sawtooth Mountains Wilderness nt ai 11 Mesquite 23 Whipple Mountains 35 Chuckwalla Mountains 47 Carrizo Gorge Wilderness ns Yucca Valley San Gorgonio Twentynine Palms 12 Stateline 24 Stepladder Mountains 36 Little Chuckwalla Mountains 48 Jacumba Wilderness 44 San Bernardino 63 W hit 31 63 Wilderness ew 53 a 63 ter 44 R iv er Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) 8 54 1 Afton Canyon 27 Fremont-Kramer DWMA 54 Pinto Mountains DWMA Oak Glen 2 Alligator Rock 28 Grimshaw Lake 55 Pisgah 80 39 Preserve 38 3 Amargosa River 29 Halloran Wash 56 Piute-Fenner DWMA Mission 4 Amboy Crater 30 Harper Dry Lake 57 Potrero Riverside Whitewater Creek 5 Barstow Wooly Sunflower 31 Indian Pass 58 Rainbow Basin/Owl Canyon Preserve Preserve 6 Bedrock Spring 32 Ivanpah DWMA 59 Rodman Mountains Cultural Area 7 Bendires Thrasher 33 Jawbone/Butterbredt 60 Salt Creek Hills 18 18 Joshua Tree National Park 8 Big Morongo Canyon 34 Johnson Canyon 61 San Sebastian Marsh/San Felipe Creek 18 FirstSolar Desert Sunlight 37 57 9 Bigelow Cholla 35 Juniper Flats 62 Sand Canyon 10 Black Mountain 36 Kingston Range 63 Santa Ana River Wash 18 Palm 11 Calico Early Man Site 37 Last Chance Canyon 64 Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve 40 12 Carbonate Endemic Plants 38 Manix 65 Shadow Valley DWMA Springs 24 13 Chemehuevi DWMA 39 Marble Mountain Fossil Bed 66 Short Canyon Riverside County 14 Christmas Canyon 40 Mesquite Hills/Crucero 67 Singer Geoglyphs 15 Chuckwalla DWMA 41 Mesquite Lake 68 Soggy Dry Lake Creosote Rings Santa Rosa/ Solar Millennium Palen Solar Project 16 Chuckwalla Valley Dune Thicket 42 Million Dollar Spring 69 Squaw Spring San Jacinto 2 17 Clark Mountain 43 Mojave Fishhook Cactus 70 Superior-Cronese DWMA 51 National NextEra Genesis Ford Dry Lake Solar Project 18 Coachella Valley Fringe-toed Lizard 44 Mojave Fringe-toed Lizard 71 Trona Pinnacles Cleveland Solar Millennium Blythe Solar Project Blythe National San Bernardino Monument 19 Coolgardie Mesa 45 Mojave Monkeyflower 72 Turtle Mountains National Forest 20 20 Corn Springs 46 Mopah Spring 74 Upper Johnson Valley Yucca Rings Forest 33 35 16 21 Cronese Basin 47 Mountain Pass Dinosaur Trackway 75 West Mesa 22 Dead Mountains 48 Mule Mountains 76 West Paradise 34 23 Denning Springs 49 North Algodones Dunes 77 Western Rand Mountain Expansion 48 24 Desert Lily Preserve 50 Ord-Rodman DWMA 78 Western Rand Mountains 15 25 Desert Tortoise Natural Area 51 Palen Dry Lake 79 Whipple Mountains 26 Dos Palmas 52 Parishs Phacelia 80 Whitewater Canyon 32 36 27 Fremont-Kramer DWMA 53 Pattons Iron Mountain Divisional Camp 26 64 Cleveland 42 National Forest Camp Pendleton Anza Borrego Desert 41 Marine Corps Base 34 State Park Chocolate Mountain Salton Naval Aerial Sea Gunnery Range Detail Map Area San Diego 42 County 61 4 0 4 8 12 Miles Imperial County 43 31 49 67 75.
Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions

    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP

    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
  • People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada

    People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: a Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada

    Portland State University PDXScholar Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations Anthropology 2012 People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada Douglas Deur Portland State University, [email protected] Deborah Confer University of Washington Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac Part of the Social and Cultural Anthropology Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Deur, Douglas and Confer, Deborah, "People of Snowy Mountain, People of the River: A Multi-Agency Ethnographic Overview and Compendium Relating to Tribes Associated with Clark County, Nevada" (2012). Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations. 98. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/anth_fac/98 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Anthropology Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Pacific West Region: Social Science Series National Park Service Publication Number 2012-01 U.S. Department of the Interior PEOPLE OF SNOWY MOUNTAIN, PEOPLE OF THE RIVER: A MULTI-AGENCY ETHNOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW AND COMPENDIUM RELATING TO TRIBES ASSOCIATED WITH CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA 2012 Douglas Deur, Ph.D. and Deborah Confer LAKE MEAD AND BLACK CANYON Doc Searls Photo, Courtesy Wikimedia Commons
  • Competitive Renewable Energy Zones

    Competitive Renewable Energy Zones

    From: Megan Lawson To: Gungle, Ashley Cc: Hingtgen, Robert J; Patrick BROWN ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Soitech follow up Date: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:34:46 PM Attachments: image001.png CA_CREZ_Conceptual_Transmission_Segments_Phase_2B_final.pdf Ashley, Here is our response to Mr. Silver's e-mail: Mr. Silver references “Competitive Renewable Energy Zones” (CREZs), which were part of the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) “Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative” (RETI) between 2008 and 2011. From what we can tell, the CEC’s RETI process appears to have stalled in early 2011, and now appears to have been set aside by the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) process. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reti/. As you know, we do not need to address the DRECP in the PEIR because the project areas are located entirely outside of the DRECP area. For the County’s reference, the RETI process identified necessary major updates to the California transmission system to access CREZs. The process identified CREZs that could be developed in the most cost effective and environmentally benign manner. Potential renewable energy projects were grouped into CREZs based on geographic proximity. The CREZ implicated in southern San Diego County is CREZ 27, San Diego South. Each CREZ was developed based on existing and proposed projects (e.g., those projects with a PPA, or PPA pending) and other projects or resources with a high potential of being developed. Because the Soitec projects were not yet proposed at the time of CREZ development (2008- 2010), Soitec’s projects were not accounted for in the CREZ, nor does CREZ 27 account for areas of high solar potential or the most cost-effective or environmentally-benign sites for future solar development.
  • Public Land Statistics 2003

    Public Land Statistics 2003

    Public Land Statistics 2003 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management TABLE OF CONTENTS Table No. WELCOME PART 1 LAND RESOURCES AND INFORMATION 1-1 Acquisition of the Public Domain, 1781-1867 --- Acquisitions (Map) 1-2 Disposition of the Public Domain, 1781-2003 1-3 Mineral and Surface Acres Administered by the BLM --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Lower 48 States (Map) --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Alaska (Map) 1-4 Public Lands Under Exclusive Jurisdiction of the BLM 1-5 Area of Oregon and California (O&C) Revested Lands --- Revested Lands (Map) 1-6 Withdrawals, Revocations, Modifications, and Extensions --- Principal Meridians and Base Lines (Map) 1-7 Cadastral Survey Actions Completed --- Cadastral Survey Costs & Benefits to BLM (Bar Graph) --- Cadastral Survey Field Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) --- Cadastral Survey Office Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) 1-8 Obligations of Appropriations Received PART 2 HEALTHY PRODUCTIVE LANDS 2-1 Percent of Rangeland Acreage by Ecological Status by State 2-2 Condition of Riparian-Wetland Areas 2-3 Resource Conservation and Improvement Accomplishments 2-4 Forest Development Accomplishments in Acres 2-5 Types of Wildlife Habitat on Public Lands 2-6 Estimated Number of Big Game Animals on Public Lands 2-7 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Improvements Completed 2-8 Emergency Fire Stabilization
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    VGP) Version 2/5/2009

    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
  • Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History

    Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History

    Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History Mojave Administrative History From Neglected Space To Protected Place: An Administrative History of Mojave National Preserve by Eric Charles Nystrom March 2003 Prepared for: United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Mojave National Preserve Great Basin CESU Cooperative Agreement H8R0701001 TABLE OF CONTENTS moja/adhi/adhi.htm Last Updated: 05-Apr-2005 http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/moja/adhi/adhi.htm[8/6/2013 5:32:15 PM] Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History (Table of Contents) Mojave Administrative History TABLE OF CONTENTS COVER ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION CHAPTER TWO: PRELUDE TO SYSTEMATIC FEDERAL MANAGEMENT Native Americans and Anglo Contact Grazing Mining Railroads Homesteading Modern Roads and Rights of Way Modern Military Training Recreation CHAPTER THREE: BLM MANAGEMENT IN THE EAST MOJAVE FLPMA and the Desert Plan The East Mojave National Scenic Area and the Genesis of the CDPA The Political Battle Over the CDPA CHAPTER FOUR: AN AWKWARD START AND THREATS OF AN EARLY END The Dollar Budget CHAPTER FIVE: PLANNING FOR MOJAVE'S FUTURE CHAPTER SIX: PARK MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION CHAPTER SEVEN: VISITOR SERVICES Resource and Visitor Protection Interpretation CHAPTER EIGHT: RESOURCE MANAGEMENT Natural Resources http://www.nps.gov/history/history/online_books/moja/adhi/adhit.htm[8/6/2013 5:32:17 PM] Mojave National Preserve: Administrative History (Table of Contents) Cultural Resources CHAPTER NINE: FUTURES BIBLIOGRAPHY FOOTNOTES INDEX (omitted from the online edition) LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Illustration 1 - Joshua tree and buckhorn cholla Illustration 2 - Prehistoric petroglyphs at Indian Well Illustration 3 - The 7IL Ranch Illustration 4 - Stone walls of 1880s-era Providence Illustration 5 - U.S.
  • Martian Crater Morphology

    Martian Crater Morphology

    ANALYSIS OF THE DEPTH-DIAMETER RELATIONSHIP OF MARTIAN CRATERS A Capstone Experience Thesis Presented by Jared Howenstine Completion Date: May 2006 Approved By: Professor M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Professor Christopher Condit, Geology Professor Judith Young, Astronomy Abstract Title: Analysis of the Depth-Diameter Relationship of Martian Craters Author: Jared Howenstine, Astronomy Approved By: Judith Young, Astronomy Approved By: M. Darby Dyar, Astronomy Approved By: Christopher Condit, Geology CE Type: Departmental Honors Project Using a gridded version of maritan topography with the computer program Gridview, this project studied the depth-diameter relationship of martian impact craters. The work encompasses 361 profiles of impacts with diameters larger than 15 kilometers and is a continuation of work that was started at the Lunar and Planetary Institute in Houston, Texas under the guidance of Dr. Walter S. Keifer. Using the most ‘pristine,’ or deepest craters in the data a depth-diameter relationship was determined: d = 0.610D 0.327 , where d is the depth of the crater and D is the diameter of the crater, both in kilometers. This relationship can then be used to estimate the theoretical depth of any impact radius, and therefore can be used to estimate the pristine shape of the crater. With a depth-diameter ratio for a particular crater, the measured depth can then be compared to this theoretical value and an estimate of the amount of material within the crater, or fill, can then be calculated. The data includes 140 named impact craters, 3 basins, and 218 other impacts. The named data encompasses all named impact structures of greater than 100 kilometers in diameter.
  • Castle Mountain Mine Plan and Reclamation

    Castle Mountain Mine Plan and Reclamation

    Castle Mountain Venture (Viceroy Gold Corporation) CASTLE MOUNTAIN MINE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MINE PLAN AND RECLAMATION PLAN Ver.2.1 (90M-013) California Mine ID NO. 91-36-0015 Prepared by: Castle Mountain Venture Castle Mountain Mine 911 American Pacific Drive., Ste. 190 Henderson, NV 89014 January 2, 2019 Castle Mountain Mine January 2019 Mine Plan and Reclamation Plan TABLE CONTENTS DESCRIPTION PAGE NO 1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Background................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Mine Ownership and Prior Approvals .................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Purpose and Need .................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.4 Organization of this Mine Plan/Reclamation Plan ................................................................. 1-4 1.4.1 Description – Site, Access, and Property ................................................................... 1-7 1.4.2 Background and Current Status of Operation ......................................................... 1-10 1.4.2.1 Early History – Hart Mining District ........................................................ 1-10 1.4.2.2 Operations (1990 – 2001) ....................................................................... 1-11 1.4.2.3 Operations
  • Mojave National Preserve California

    Mojave National Preserve California

    A fact sheet from 2017 Dougall Photography/iStockphoto Mojave’s $131.8 million maintenance backlog includes repairs to historic buildings such as the Kelso Depot. Shane McMurphy/iStockphoto Mojave National Preserve California Overview Two hours from the hustle and bustle of Las Vegas and 100 miles from the nearest lodging lies California’s Mojave National Preserve. The Las Vegas Review-Journal dubbed this vast desert in San Bernardino County the “perfect escape for those seeking serenity.” The preserve spans 1.6 million acres, making it the third-largest National Park Service (NPS) unit in the contiguous United States. Mojave is ecologically and geologically diverse, with towering sand dunes, dun-colored mesas, and volcanic formations providing habitat for its abundant plants and wildlife. In addition to the densest forest of Joshua trees in the world, visitors can see bighorn sheep, bobcats, golden eagles, and breathtaking displays of seasonal wildflowers. The preserve also has a rich cultural heritage. Lands first inhabited by the Chemehuevi and Mojave tribes attracted gold miners in the late 19th century and were later crossed by several railroad lines. Visitors can learn more about this history through exhibits at the visitor center and by exploring archaeological sites, abandoned mines, and preserved homesteads and other buildings. The ghost town of Kelso, which once served as a Union Pacific Railroad depot and mining outpost, is one of the park’s most popular destinations. Unfortunately, Mojave faces over $131 million in deferred maintenance. Maintenance challenges Nearly all of Mojave’s needed repairs are for its road network. Severe deterioration of some sections of pavement has prompted the NPS to warn visitors of dangerous potholes.
  • March 21, 2014

    March 21, 2014

    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
  • Cyprinodon Nevadensis Mionectes Ash Meadows Amargosa Pupfish

    Cyprinodon Nevadensis Mionectes Ash Meadows Amargosa Pupfish

    Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfsh Cyprinodon nevadensis mionectes WAP 2012 species due to impacts from introduced detrimental aquatc species, habitat degradaton, and federal endangered status. Agency Status NV Natural Heritage G2T2S2 USFWS LE BLM-NV Sensitve State Prot Threatened Fish NAC 503.065.3 CCVI Presumed Stable TREND: Trend is stable to increasing with contnued on-going restoraton actvites. DISTRIBUTION: Springs and associated springbrooks, outlow stream systems and terminal marshes within Ash Meadows Natonal Wildlife Refuge, Nye Co., NV. GENERAL HABITAT AND LIFE HISTORY: This species is isolated to warm springs and outlows in Ash Meadows NWR including Point of Rocks, Crystal Springs, and the Carson Slough drainage. Pupfshes feed generally on substrate; feeding territories are ofen defended by pupfshes. Diet consists of mainly algae and detritus however, aquatc insects, crustaceans, snails and eggs are also consumed. Spawning actvity is typically from February to September and in some cases year round. Males defend territories vigorously during breeding season (Soltz and Naiman 1978). In warm springs, fsh may reach sexual maturity in 4-6 weeks. Reproducton variable: in springs, pupfsh breed throughout the year, may have 8-10 generatons/year; in streams, breeds in spring and summer, 2-3 generatons/year (Moyle 1976). In springs, males establish territories over sites suitable for ovipositon. Short generaton tme allows small populatons to be viable. Young adults typically comprise most of the biomass of a populaton. Compared to other C. nevadensis subspecies, this pupfsh has a short deep body and long head with typically low fn ray and scale counts (Soltz and Naiman 1978). CONSERVATION CHALLENGES: Being previously threatened by agricultural use of the area (loss and degradaton of habitat resultng from water diversion and pumping) and by impending residental development, the TNC purchased property, which later became the Ash Meadows NWR.