DOCSLIB.ORG

BLM Wilderness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BLM Wilderness I;;I LlL-L/ F] NATIONAL LAND PE coNSERVATTOM SYSTEM I ffii**i "t&"Q'it't'q#d;fr 1;I, a D I rt-l orl I -II g a Wilderness: 'Jdnetfty/ 46y^*ry{- -"ir4 National Landscape Preserving and Providing /t il,,^^1yt *.%,'r*o E *J), Conservation System: /*,u [t J America's Natural Treasures - Wallace Stegner Many people use "wilderness" to describe any Wilderness areas help to maintain gene pools that The Bureau of Land Management's National remote, rugged, and undeveloped land. Since provide a diversity of plant and animal life in our Landscape Conservation System contains some passage of the 1964 Wilderness Act, the word has world and serve as a unique and irreplaceable of the West's most spectacular natural areas. lt been defined in very specific terms. According to "living laboratory" for medical and scientific research. includes over 850 federally recognized areas and the Wilderness Act, federal lands must have special approximalely 27 million acres of national monu- Wilderness areas are places where people can characteristics to be designated by Congress as part ments, national conservation areas, wilderness renew their spirits through contact with the natural of the National Wilderness Preservation System: areas, wilderness study areas, wild and scenic world. With many uses, values, and scenic resources, rivers, national scenic and historic trails, and con- "A Wilderness... is hereby recognized as an area wilderness has always been part of the American servation lands of the California desert. where the earth and its community of life are culture and character. untrammeled by man, where man himself is a ln California, the Bureau manages 88 wilderness visitor who does not remain... retaining its primeval areas encompassing almost four million acres, in character and influence, without permanent improve- Wilderness Study addition to 69 wilderness study areas. These and ments or human habitation, which is protected and AfeaSl Keeping options open California's other Conservation System areas are managed so as to preserve its natural conditions...." part of an active, vibrant landscape where people (Wilderness Act ot 1964). live, work, and play. They offer exceptional oppor- Wilderness Study Areas are managed to maintain tunities for recreation, solitude, wildlife viewing, Wilderness areas are generally open to: their wilderness suitability until Congress either exploring history, scientific research, and a wide . hunting and fishing . hiking designates them as wilderness or denies this range of traditional uses. camping . backpacking designation through legislative action. ln the . horseback riding . use of pack animals Th ese landsca pes- s,pq rk.th e, irn gi nati o n . Th e Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976, -.a . float trips . canoeing and kayaking Cooseroatisn Congress provided the Bureau with guidance on sw . scientific research . nature study how to inyentory roa-dless areas on public land and For mote i n abouttruEdilnar Landscape Conservation System, wildernesses, or wilderness study areas near you, contact our local field offices, call (916) 978-4400, oq,vi www.blm .gav/ca/nlcs I Fffi { .li *ifi i &# ,#+# € : f# .: . at Mecca Hills Wilderness Uv gofi$i6l{ , 1 Bf,pkpackers 1r lilSet: Equestrians at Ventana Wilderness I 'ffi' €, kr l WILDERNESS AREAS WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS 1 Jacumba 13 Chuckwalla Mountains 25 Old Woman Mountains 37 Kelso D 1es WSA-1 Garcia Mountain 2 Carrizo Gorge 14 Orocopia Mountains 26 Turtle Mountains 38 DeadM untains WSA-2 Black Mountain 3 Coyote Mountains 15 Mecca Hills 27 Whipple Mountains 39 BlackM untain WSA-3 Sheep Ridge 4 Little Picacho 16 Palen/McCoy 28 Chemehuevi Mountains 40 Grass V ley WSA-4 Milk Ranch/Case Mountain 5 Sawtooth Mountains 17 Big Maria Mountains 29 Stepladder Mountains 41 Golden alley WSA-5 Moses 6 Fish Creek Mountains 18 Rice Valley 30 Trilobite 42 Hollow ills WSA-6 Owens Peak 7 North Algodones Dunes 19 Riverside Mountains 31 Rodman Mountains 43 El Paso ountains WSA-7 Sacatar Meadows 8 Picacho Peak 20 San Gorgonio 32 Clipper Mountain 44 Bright S r WSA-8 Rockhouse 9 Indian Pass 21 Sheephole Valley 33 Piute Mountains 45 Kiavah WSA-9 Scodie 10 Palo Verde Mountains 22 Cleghorn Lakes 34 Bigelow Cholla Garden 46 Kings to WSA-10 Caliente Mountain 11 Santa Rosa 23 Bighorn Mountain 35 Newberry Mountains 47 Mesquit WSA-11 Piute Cypress ISA 12 Little Chuckwalla Mountains 24 Cadiz Dunes 36 Bristol Mountains 48 Statelin WSA-12 Cerro Gordo 49 NorthM squite Mountains WSA-13 Southern Inyo 50 Saddle P ak Hills WSA-14 Independence Creek u 51 Owens P ak WSA-1s Crater Mountain S2 Chimne Peak WSA-16 Symmes Creek S3 Domela WSA-17 Chidago Canyon S4 WSA-18 Fish Slough SS WSA-19 Volcanic Tablelands s6 WSA-20 Casa Diablo 57 WSA-21 Excelsior ss South Nopah Range WSA-22 Mount Biedeman S9 PahrumP. Valley WSA-23 Bodie Mountain 60 Nopah Range WSA-24 Bodie 61 Resting qpring Range WSA-2s Slinkard 62 Surprise Canyon WSA-26 Machesna 63 Coso Rat ge WSA-27 Pit River Canyon 64 Funeral Mountains WSA-28 Tule Mountain 65 Darwin alls WSA-29 Tunnison Mountain 66 Malpais 1esa WSA-30 Bitterbrush ISA 67 Inyo MoI1tains WSA-31 Five Springs 68 Piper M ntain WSA-32 Skedaddle 69 Sylvania Mountains WSA-33 Dry Valley Rim 70 Otay Mo ntain WSA-34 Poodle Mountains 71 Maches a Mtn WSA-3s Buffalo Hills 72 Santa Lupia WSA-36 T\~in Peaks 73 Ventana Additions WSA-37 South Warner Contiguous 74 Cedar Roughs WSA-38 Wall Canyon 7S Cache C ek WSA-39 Sheldon Contiguous 76 Yuki WSA-40 Massacre rum 77 South Fo k Eel River WSA-41 Timbered Crater 78 Elkhorn ·age (&Baker Cypress ISA) 79 Yolla Bo! y-Middle Eel WSA-42 Lava So King Range WSA-43 Yolla Bally Contiguous 81 Rocks and Islands WSA-44 Merced River I 82 Trinity Alps WSA-45 Panache Hills North 83 Ishi ! WSA-46 Panache Hills South 84 Beauty Mountain WSA-47 Bear Mountain 85 Pinto Mountains WSA-48 Bear Canyon 86 Granite l\!!ountain WSA-49 San Benito Mountain ISA 87 Agua Tibia WSA-so Big Butte 88 vVhite M@untains WSA-s1 Thatcher Ridge WSA-s2 Eden Valley WSA-s3 Rocky Creek/Cache Creek / "i WSA-54 Beauty Mountain WSA-ss San Ysidro Mountain WSAcS6 San Felipe Hills WSA-S7 Sawtooth Mountains A WSA-58 Sawtooth Mountains C WSA-59 Carrizo Gorge WSA-60 Table Mountain WSA-61 Hauser Mountain WSA-62 Carson-Iceberg WSA-63 Avawatz Mountains WSA-64 Kingston Range WSA-65 Soda Mountains WSA-66 Death Valley - 17 Visalia• Great Falls Basin Cady Mountains White Mountains 0 7 ± EL CENTRO so .110~.20_ • 00 i:l ~ ...=...r::: ·- !(l 4o ~ zo •(\ " [Y~::--.,]=---_..... Land Status Federal Wilderness Bureau of Land Management Bureau of Land Management BLM Wilderness US Forest Service Wilderness Study Areas National Park Service US Forest Service NATIONAL LANDSCAPE US Fish and Wildlife Ser1ice National Park Service Military CONSERVATION o BLM FIELD OFFICE State SYSTEM • Cities!T owns ReserJations and Rancherias • National Landscape Conservation System NM=National Monument California Desert Conservation Area c:J NGA= National Conservation Area D BLM Field Ottice Boundary ONA=Outstanding Natural Area Leave No Trace: Step Up and Step Lightly America's recreation lands, from state parks to vast wilderness areas, are being used and enjoyed by more people each year. Non-motorized use, be it hiking, camping, river-running, hunting, or other outdoor activities, leaves marks on the land. We must do more than pick up litter and extinguish campfires. Leave No Trace, a national outdoor skills and ethics education program, promotes land stewardship, minimum-impact skills, and wilder- ness ethics for America's public lands. By following the seven Leave No Trace principles, you can help preserve our cherished natural areas: Plan Ahead and Prepare Travel and Camp on Durable Surfaces Dispose of Waste Propetly Leave What You Find Minimize Campfire lmpacts \ Respect Wildlife Be Considerate of Other Visitors vv Yv YV,IJIl I l.5wv/ Usl r llrrp Learn more at Leave No Trace: rI{ewsbytes www. t nt.o r gl progr amslpri nci ples Subscribe to News.bytes, www.lnt.org ou r weekly e-newsletter @ lsg::. *g"lrgs:.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • California Vegetation Map in Support of the DRECP
    CALIFORNIA VEGETATION MAP IN SUPPORT OF THE DESERT RENEWABLE ENERGY CONSERVATION PLAN (2014-2016 ADDITIONS) John Menke, Edward Reyes, Anne Hepburn, Deborah Johnson, and Janet Reyes Aerial Information Systems, Inc. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Renewable Energy Program and the California Energy Commission Final Report May 2016 Prepared by: Primary Authors John Menke Edward Reyes Anne Hepburn Deborah Johnson Janet Reyes Report Graphics Ben Johnson Cover Page Photo Credits: Joshua Tree: John Fulton Blue Palo Verde: Ed Reyes Mojave Yucca: John Fulton Kingston Range, Pinyon: Arin Glass Aerial Information Systems, Inc. 112 First Street Redlands, CA 92373 (909) 793-9493 [email protected] in collaboration with California Department of Fish and Wildlife Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95811 and California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for this project was provided by: California Energy Commission US Bureau of Land Management California Wildlife Conservation Board California Department of Fish and Wildlife Personnel involved in developing the methodology and implementing this project included: Aerial Information Systems: Lisa Cotterman, Mark Fox, John Fulton, Arin Glass, Anne Hepburn, Ben Johnson, Debbie Johnson, John Menke, Lisa Morse, Mike Nelson, Ed Reyes, Janet Reyes, Patrick Yiu California Department of Fish and Wildlife: Diana Hickson, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Anne Klein, Aicha Ougzin, Rosalie Yacoub California
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy
    Iron Mountains Endangered Desert Legacy Location: The Iron Mountains area is located in the Mojave Desert, in both San Bernardino and Riverside Counties, south of the town of Cadiz. The area is located north of Highway 62, northeast of Joshua Tree National Park, south of the Cadiz Dunes Wilderness and southwest of the Old Woman Mountains Wilderness. The area abuts the eastern side of the Cadiz Valley. Management Agency: Bureau of Land Management, Needles Field Office Description: The terrain includes rugged mountains, playas, sand dunes, bajadas, washes and dozens of other geologic features. The area also contains a portion of Danby Lake (dry). Elevations range from about 600 feet to about 3,200 feet. Wildlife and Plants: The Iron Mountains area is habitat for the endangered desert tortoise, the protected desert bighorn sheep (photo above), and several species on the state watch-list, including the Mojave fringe-toed lizard, hepatic tanager, and prairie falcon. Emory's crucifixion-thorn and Harwood's eriastrum can also be found here. In 1999, a Gila monster was also seen in the area. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife recognizes this area as a wildlife migration corridor, which is an area connecting wildlife populations that have been separated due to human activities. Corridors help avoid inbreeding and may help to re-establish populations that have been reduced or eliminated due to random events such as fire or disease. Desert bighorn sheep have also been found to migrate between the Iron Mountains and the Old Woman Mountains, which can be an important factor in trying to ensure that the species does not die out.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlet SIM 3411: Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5' Quadrangle
    Geologic Map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ Quadrangle, Arizona and California By P. Kyle House, Barbara E. John, Daniel V. Malmon, Debra Block, L. Sue Beard, Tracey J. Felger, Ryan S. Crow, Jonathan E. Schwing, and Colleen E. Cassidy Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3411 Kayaker's view of Castle Rock (unit Tac) looking north-northeast from Castle Rock Bay, Arizona. The northern Mohave Mountains are visible in left background, and sediments of the Chemehuevi Formation (unit Qch) are seen along right edge of photo. Photograph taken August 27, 2014, by Kyle House, USGS. 2018 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2018 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov/ or call 1–888–ASK–USGS (1–888–275–8747). For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. To order USGS information products, visit https://store.usgs.gov/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner. Suggested citation: House, P.K., John, B.E., Malmon, D.V., Block, Debra, Beard, L.S., Felger, T.J., Crow, R.S., Schwing, J.E., and Cassidy, C.E., 2018, Geologic map of the Castle Rock 7.5’ quadrangle: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA)
    Chemehuevi Valley Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA) The Chemehuevi Valley Viewshed with the Turtle Mountains National Natural Landmark is directly west of the communities of Havasu Landing, California and Lake Havasu City, Arizona. The Turtle Mountains Natural Landmark is an excellent illustration of volcanic phenomena with superimposed sculpturing of mountain landforms. In combination, the eastern and western sections present some of the finest geological formations in the Mohave Desert. The site is of scenic value and interest; it also contains excellent examples of Mohave Desert flora and fauna. From October to April each year hundreds of travelers “snowbirds” from the northeastern United States, Canada and Europe journey to the area to enjoy the mild winter climate seeking new experiences, enjoying vast landscape which have not existed in European Nations for hundreds of years. Visitors participate in backcountry touring adventure and the discovery of new hiking trails, rock hounding sites and camping opportunities. The Chemehuevi Reservation Havasu Landing Resort depends on the naturalness of the Chemehuevi Valley to support the recreation pursuits of their visitors. The Needles Field Office has developed a system of designated trails entitled the Mojave Adventure Routes in regards to the 2002 Northern and Eastern Colorado Desert Coordinated Management Plan item 3.8.7. These routes are an outstanding network of 4x4 vehicle backcountry touring routes for motorized recreation. These routes were developed for the purpose of traveling to areas not often seen by many people. This network is a shared-use trail system providing recreation opportunities for all persons, including those who use street-legal and non-street legal (Green Sticker) vehicles, hikers, bicyclists, and equestrians.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Project Partners
    Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy Technical Appendix JANUARY 2011 Prepared for: State of California Coastal Conservancy Project team: Natural Resources Services Division of Redwood Community Action Agency Alta Planning + Design Planwest Partners Streamline Planning Consultants Humboldt County Coastal Trail Implementation Strategy TECHNICAL APPENDICES Thank you to the community members and agency staff who provided input during public meetings and advisory team workshops throughout the planning process. Your participation and contributions are key to this and future efforts to bring the CCT to fruition. Peter Jarausch Project Manager State of California Coastal Conservancy [email protected] This plan was made possible through Proposition 40 funding Photo credits: Kids on bicycles, N. Wynne; Trail horses, U. Driscoll; Eureka boardwalk, J. Kalt All other photos by project team Appendix A: Project Partners Primary Partners ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Federal Agencies .............................................................................................................................................................. 2 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ....................................................................................................................... 2 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Competitive Renewable Energy Zones
    From: Megan Lawson To: Gungle, Ashley Cc: Hingtgen, Robert J; Patrick BROWN ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Subject: RE: Soitech follow up Date: Friday, October 04, 2013 2:34:46 PM Attachments: image001.png CA_CREZ_Conceptual_Transmission_Segments_Phase_2B_final.pdf Ashley, Here is our response to Mr. Silver's e-mail: Mr. Silver references “Competitive Renewable Energy Zones” (CREZs), which were part of the California Energy Commission’s (CEC) “Renewable Energy Transmission Initiative” (RETI) between 2008 and 2011. From what we can tell, the CEC’s RETI process appears to have stalled in early 2011, and now appears to have been set aside by the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP) process. http://www.energy.ca.gov/reti/. As you know, we do not need to address the DRECP in the PEIR because the project areas are located entirely outside of the DRECP area. For the County’s reference, the RETI process identified necessary major updates to the California transmission system to access CREZs. The process identified CREZs that could be developed in the most cost effective and environmentally benign manner. Potential renewable energy projects were grouped into CREZs based on geographic proximity. The CREZ implicated in southern San Diego County is CREZ 27, San Diego South. Each CREZ was developed based on existing and proposed projects (e.g., those projects with a PPA, or PPA pending) and other projects or resources with a high potential of being developed. Because the Soitec projects were not yet proposed at the time of CREZ development (2008- 2010), Soitec’s projects were not accounted for in the CREZ, nor does CREZ 27 account for areas of high solar potential or the most cost-effective or environmentally-benign sites for future solar development.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Land Statistics 2003
    Public Land Statistics 2003 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management TABLE OF CONTENTS Table No. WELCOME PART 1 LAND RESOURCES AND INFORMATION 1-1 Acquisition of the Public Domain, 1781-1867 --- Acquisitions (Map) 1-2 Disposition of the Public Domain, 1781-2003 1-3 Mineral and Surface Acres Administered by the BLM --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Lower 48 States (Map) --- Public Lands, On-Shore Federal and Indian Minerals in Lands of the U.S. Responsibilities of BLM - Alaska (Map) 1-4 Public Lands Under Exclusive Jurisdiction of the BLM 1-5 Area of Oregon and California (O&C) Revested Lands --- Revested Lands (Map) 1-6 Withdrawals, Revocations, Modifications, and Extensions --- Principal Meridians and Base Lines (Map) 1-7 Cadastral Survey Actions Completed --- Cadastral Survey Costs & Benefits to BLM (Bar Graph) --- Cadastral Survey Field Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) --- Cadastral Survey Office Accomplishments: Percentage of Work Performed by Agency (Pie Chart) 1-8 Obligations of Appropriations Received PART 2 HEALTHY PRODUCTIVE LANDS 2-1 Percent of Rangeland Acreage by Ecological Status by State 2-2 Condition of Riparian-Wetland Areas 2-3 Resource Conservation and Improvement Accomplishments 2-4 Forest Development Accomplishments in Acres 2-5 Types of Wildlife Habitat on Public Lands 2-6 Estimated Number of Big Game Animals on Public Lands 2-7 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Improvements Completed 2-8 Emergency Fire Stabilization
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Manager's Report Fiscal Year 2015
    Summary Manager’s Report Fiscal Year 2015 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, and Similar Designations Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, Utah Page 2 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 The Bureau of Land Management’s (BLM’s) National Landscape Conservation System (National Conservation Lands) manages 873 units, including 46 National Monuments, National Conservation Areas (NCAs), and similar designations. The National Conservation Lands are uniquely diverse. They encompass red-rock deserts and rugged ocean coastlines, deep river canyons and broad Alaskan tundra. Many areas are remote and wild, but others are surprisingly accessible. The National Conservation Lands also protect our cultural legacy. They safeguard American Indian cliff dwellings and cultural sites and preserve the remaining traces of our nation’s historic trails. These units are the most well-known and well-visited of the National Conservation Lands. The management of these special units supports the BLM’s mission of sustaining the health, diversity, and productivity of public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. This report summarizes the successes and challenges from each unit as reported through the annual “Manager’s Reports” for fiscal year 2015. McInnis Canyons National Conservation Area, Colorado Page 3 Summary of Manager’s Reports for Fiscal Year 2015 - National Monuments and National Conservation Areas Highlights of Fiscal Year 2015 Recreation Mapping In 2015, the National Conservation Lands office achieved its goal of developing standardized recreation maps for every National Monument and National Conservation Area and posting those maps on recreation-focused web pages.
    [Show full text]
  • VGP) Version 2/5/2009
    Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) VESSEL GENERAL PERMIT FOR DISCHARGES INCIDENTAL TO THE NORMAL OPERATION OF VESSELS (VGP) AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provisions of the Clean Water Act (CWA), as amended (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.), any owner or operator of a vessel being operated in a capacity as a means of transportation who: • Is eligible for permit coverage under Part 1.2; • If required by Part 1.5.1, submits a complete and accurate Notice of Intent (NOI) is authorized to discharge in accordance with the requirements of this permit. General effluent limits for all eligible vessels are given in Part 2. Further vessel class or type specific requirements are given in Part 5 for select vessels and apply in addition to any general effluent limits in Part 2. Specific requirements that apply in individual States and Indian Country Lands are found in Part 6. Definitions of permit-specific terms used in this permit are provided in Appendix A. This permit becomes effective on December 19, 2008 for all jurisdictions except Alaska and Hawaii. This permit and the authorization to discharge expire at midnight, December 19, 2013 i Vessel General Permit (VGP) Version 2/5/2009 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 William K. Honker, Acting Director Robert W. Varney, Water Quality Protection Division, EPA Region Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1 6 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, 2008 Signed and issued this 18th day of December, Barbara A.
    [Show full text]
  • Coachella Valley Conservation Commission
    COACHELLA VALLEY CONSERVATION COMMISSION Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:00 a.m. CVAG Offices 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 119 Palm Desert, CA 92260 (760) 346-1127 Teleconferencing will be available at: Imperial Irrigation District 1653 W. Main Street El Centro CA 92243 THIS MEETING IS HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE. ACTION MAY RESULT ON ANY ITEMS ON THIS AGENDA. 1. CALL TO ORDER - Chair Richard W. Kite, Councilmember, City of Rancho Mirage 2. ROLL CALL A. Member Roster P. 4 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENTS This is the time and place for any person wishing to address the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to do so. 5. COMMITTEE MEMBER/DIRECTOR COMMENTS 6. CONSENT CALENDAR` A. Approve Minutes of the April 12, 2012 Coachella Valley Conservation P. 5 Commission B. Receive and File 1. Quarterly Unaudited Financial Statements as at March 31, 2012 P. 8 2. Investment Report as at March 31, 2012 P. 9 3. Participating Special Entity Status for Southern California Edison Pole P. 10 Replacement Project 4. Attendance Roster P. 11 7. DISCUSSION / ACTION (Map 1 – Regional Context for Land Acquisitions is referenced in staff reports 7A through 7E. Map 1 is found only in Item 7A) A. Acquisition of approximately 2.74 acres from private landowners for a total P. 12 purchase price of $38,000 plus closing costs (continued from April 12 meeting) - Kevin McKernan, Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution 12-004 authorizing acquisition of 2.74 acres (2 parcels) within the CVMSHCP Conservation Areas for a total purchase price of $38,000 and an additional amount not expected to exceed $1,000 for closing costs, and authorize the Executive Director or Chair to sign documents and take such actions as necessary to effect the conveyance.
    [Show full text]
  • King Range National Conservation Area Case Study
    University of Colorado Law School Colorado Law Scholarly Commons Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Books, Reports, and Studies Resources, Energy, and the Environment 2004 King Range National Conservation Area Case Study Ann Morgan Doug Cannon University of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/books_reports_studies Part of the Natural Resources and Conservation Commons, Natural Resources Law Commons, and the Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons Citation Information Ann Morgan & Doug Cannon, King Range National Conservation Area Case Study (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Ann Morgan & Doug Cannon, KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA CASE STUDY (Natural Res. Law Ctr., Univ. of Colo. Sch. of Law 2004). Reproduced with permission of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy, and the Environment (formerly the Natural Resources Law Center) at the University of Colorado Law School. KING RANGE NATIONAL CONSERVATION AREA CASE STUDY Ann Morgan and Doug Cannon Natural Resources Law Center January 9, 2004 Table of Contents BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1 PUBLIC LAW 91-476....................................................................................................................... 2 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]