Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference Lincoln, Nebraska – May 30 - June 1 2

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference Lincoln, Nebraska – May 30 - June 1 2 Blue Water, Green Water and the Future of Agriculture Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference Lincoln, Nebraska – May 30 - June 1 2 ©2013, The Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska. All rights reserved. Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference, May 30-June 1, 2012, Lincoln, NE. Citation: University of Nebraska–Lincoln Office of Research and Economic Development (2013). Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference. Lincoln. ISBN: 978-0-615-73973-1 Additional comments and questions may be directed to: Roberto Lenton, Founding Executive Director, Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute 234 Whittier Research Center 2200 Vine St. P.O. Box 830860 Lincoln, NE 68583-0860 USA (402) 472-5145 • [email protected] Credits Executive Editor Monica Norby Writer Gillian Klucas Managing Editor Ashley Washburn Contributing Editors Elizabeth Banset, Vicki Miller Photography Joel Brehm, Craig Chandler, Brett Hampton Additional Photos Neil Palmer, CIAT International Center for Tropical Agriculture/Flickr, p. 13, p. 14, p. 16, p. 36, pp. 82-83; Alida Vanni/iStock, p. 46 Design Sym Labs Transcription Doris Schuessler The University of Nebraska is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity institution. Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference 3 Conference Sponsors Major conference support underwritten by Robert B. Daugherty Charitable Foundation Generous conference support provided by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Monsanto Syngenta Additional conference support provided by Pioneer, a DuPont Company Global Harvest Initiative Water for Food Conference Committees Senior Advisory Council Michael Doane, Monsanto Simi Kamal, Hisaar Foundation Roberto Lenton, Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute Robert Meaney, Valmont Industries Inc. Keith Olsen, Nebraska farmer, Nebraska Farm Bureau (retired) Prem S. Paul, University of Nebraska–Lincoln University of Nebraska Conference Staff Faculty Planning Committee University of Nebraska–Lincoln Marc Andreini Office of Research and Economic Development Ann Bleed Tom Farrell Elizabeth Banset Sheri Fritz Joel Brehm Michael Fromm Peg Filliez Lilyan Fulginiti Mari Greer John Gates Rachael Herpel Mark Gustafson Bryan Kinnan Suat Irmak Vicki Miller Sally Mackenzie Kristen Ohnoutka Monica Norby Jon Ross Ron Yoder Tim Savage Mike Zeleny Peter Stewart Corrie Svehla Karen Underwood Ashley Washburn Becky Zavala 4 Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Preface ................................................................................................................................................ 9 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... 10 Chapter 1: Solving the Water for Food Equation ............................................................ 20 President’s Welcome ........................................................................................................................... 22 James B. Milliken, President, University of Nebraska The Future of Water for Food: Addressing the Challenge .................................................................. 24 Roberto Lenton, Founding Executive Director, Robert B. Daugherty Water for Food Institute, University of Nebraska The Future of Agriculture: A Look Through the Green-Blue Water Lens ................................................................................................................ 28 Malin Falkenmark, Senior Scientific Adviser, Stockholm International Water Institute, Sweden Water and Food Security: Stumbling Toward Malthusian Oblivion or Pioneering Cornucopia? .................................................................................................. 31 Colin Chartres, Director General, International Water Management Institute, Sri Lanka Working Together for Water: Collective Action and Property Rights ................................................. 35 Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Senior Research Fellow, International Food Policy Research Institute System and Crop-Level Drivers of Grain Production in Rainfed Agriculture ..................................... 39 Victor Sadras, Associate Professor, Principal Scientist, Crop Ecophysiology, South Australian Research and Development Institute Water-Related Challenges to Global Food Security ........................................................................... 43 Charles Iceland, Senior Associate II, World Resources Institute Chapter 2: Blue Water, Green Water and the Future of Agriculture ....................... 46 Agricultural Producers Panel – A View from the Field ....................................................................... 48 Industry Leaders Panel ....................................................................................................................... 54 Women, Water and Food Panel Discussion ....................................................................................... 60 Innovative Water Governance in Nebraska and Brazil ....................................................................... 68 Closing Panel ...................................................................................................................................... 76 Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference 5 Chapter 3: Scientific Sessions ............................................................................................... 82 Emerging Crop Technologies for Improving Performance in Tough Environments .......................... 84 New Technology for Stressed Fields ................................................................................................ 84 Breeding for Drought Tolerance ....................................................................................................... 85 Using Proven and New Technologies ............................................................................................... 85 Aluminum Tolerance Genes ............................................................................................................. 86 Breeding Epigenomes ...................................................................................................................... 86 Groundwater Resource Assessment in Water-Stressed Regions: Past, Present and Future .................................................................................................................... 87 Modeling Studies for Groundwater Systems .................................................................................... 87 Abstractions Versus Recharge ......................................................................................................... 88 Hard Rock Water Resources ........................................................................................................... 88 Assessing and Expanding Zambia’s Resources ................................................................................ 88 Water Laws and Sustainability .......................................................................................................... 89 Appendix ......................................................................................................................................... 90 Juried Poster Competition .................................................................................................................. 92 Conference Participants ..................................................................................................................... 98 Conference Photos ........................................................................................................................... 106 Ag Tour Photos ................................................................................................................................. 112 6 1 – Section Title Proceedings of the 2012 Water for Food Conference 7 Foreword In May 2012, as we convened the fourth global Water for Food Institute is to move innovative Water for Food Conference in Lincoln, Neb., research, technologies and ideas out of the record-setting crop yields were being forecast for laboratory and into the hands of farmers and U.S. farmers. By August, a historic drought had resource managers through creative partnerships engulfed one-third of the nation, driving up grain with private and public sector organizations prices and confirming the linkage between water throughout the world. and food security and the need to address this complex challenge on a global level. The Water for Food Conference, hosted by the University of Nebraska with major support The focus of the 2012 Water for Food Conference, from the Robert B. Daugherty Charitable “Blue Water, Green Water and the Future of Foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Agriculture,” was relevant globally and certainly Monsanto and Syngenta, brought together in Nebraska, where agriculture relies equally about 500 people from 28 countries working to on blue and green water. Forty-six percent of ensure water and food security. We heard from Nebraska’s crops are irrigated with “blue” water small- and large-scale farmers, plant scientists, from the High Plains Aquifer and rivers and industry leaders, natural resource managers, streams; the other 54 percent are rainfed, government officials and many others. This depending on “green” water. report documents the ideas and discussions that emerged from the conference. Nebraska farmers,
Recommended publications
  • R0202'11 LSB Research Services Division MG
    Rep. McCann offered the following concurrent resolution: House Concurrent Resolution No. 41. A concurrent resolution to urge the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) to pursue bicycle friendly policies by providing for bicycles on board trains and bicycle parking in future station plans. Whereas, An efficient, modern, transportation system is a pillar of a healthy economic climate and vital for Michigan's future. All modes of 21st century transportation infrastructure should be made accessible to modern travelers, whether tourists or commuters. Seamless multi-modal connections are essential to facilitate tourism and to allow greater mobility for bike commuters and those without cars. Bicyclists should be able to switch between transportation modes and link trips by bringing bicycles on trains without having to check them as boxed luggage. Bicycle tourism and commuting would be further accommodated with short and long-term bike parking at Amtrak stations. Unfortunately, Amtrak does not allow bicycles on board Michigan routes at this time and bike parking is not always available; and Whereas, Amtrak's routes out of Chicago, the Downstate Illinois Service and Missouri River Runner, offer roll-on bike service; the option to bring bicycles on board, either by storing bikes on board in bike racks, or secured as checked baggage with tie-down equipment (not in a box), and allow folding bicycles on board as carry-on baggage. All three of the Michigan Amtrak routes, The Blue Water, Lake Shore Limited and Pere Marquette lines, use the same equipment as Chicago area trains and would only have to update the reservations system to allow bikes on board in Michigan; and Whereas, Bicycle tourism is a booming industry and many Michigan bike tour events are located in or near cities accessible by Amtrak service.
    [Show full text]
  • 20210419 Amtrak Metrics Reporting
    NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION 30th Street Station Philadelphia, PA 19104 April 12, 2021 Mr. Michael Lestingi Director, Office of Policy and Planning Federal Railroad Administrator U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Lestingi: In accordance with the Metrics and Minimum Standards for Intercity Passenger Rail Service final rule published on November 16, 2020 (the “Final Rule”), this letter serves as Amtrak’s report to the Federal Railroad Administration that, as of April 10, 2021, Amtrak has provided the 29 host railroads over which Amtrak currently operates (listed in Appendix A) with ridership data for the prior month consistent with the Final Rule. The following data was provided to each host railroad: . the total number of passengers, by train and by day; . the station-specific number of detraining passengers, reported by host railroad whose railroad right-of-way serves the station, by train, and by day; and . the station-specific number of on-time passengers reported by host railroad whose railroad right- of-way serves the station, by train, and by day. Please let me know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Jim Blair Sr. Director, Host Railroads Amtrak cc: Dennis Newman Amtrak Jason Maga Amtrak Christopher Zappi Amtrak Yoel Weiss Amtrak Kristin Ferriter Federal Railroad Administration Mr. Michael Lestingi April 12, 2021 Page 2 Appendix A Host Railroads Provided with Amtrak Ridership Data Host Railroad1 Belt Railway Company of Chicago BNSF Railway Buckingham Branch Railroad
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Transit
    Gear boxes and couplings Heavy-duty braking systems Subway cars, commuter cars or trolley cars. Rockwell Our wedge, cam, disc or spring brakes, actuated by air has the capability to supply the type of gear box or or hydraulic pressure, will stop most any vehicle you coupling you specify. Or, we can custom design "special start. Add our Skid-Trol® wheel anti-lock system and drives" for unique vehicle applications. you have a single source for most all heavy-duty stopping requirements. line From Concept to Reality That's what cities like San Francisco, Boston, New York, Chicago and Washington, the Dallas/Fort Worth and Seattle/Tacoma airports, Disney World, the Toronto Zoo and others have done. We can put our 50 years' mass transit experience, the resources of the world's largest independent Automotive Technical Center, and a broad line of components for rail cars, buses and guideway vehicles to work for you, too. Contact Mass Transit Sales, Automotive Operations, Rockwell International, 2135 W. Maple Road, Troy, MI 48084. Rail trucks The broadest line of axles We make complete rail trucks or components for The mass transit industry uses our steering, driving locomotives, freight cars, subway cars, and commuter and trailer axles — single and tandem — in a variety of cars. Or if you have a special rail vehicle in mind, we'll configurations for highway and guideway vehicles. Plus help you make it go. custom design axles for virtually every mass transpor- tation application. Rockwell International ...where science gets down to business ALMEX Passenger self service. This is one wayof looking at it.
    [Show full text]
  • Help Card.Pdf
    St. Clair County Help Card Emergency Services Employment Assistance Police/Fire/EMS 911 Experience Works (ages 55+) (810) 966-3306 Poison Control (800) 222-1222 Michigan Works (810) 966-3300 Blue Water Safe Horizons - Crisis Line (810) 985-5538 Michigan Rehabilitation Services (810) 982-8571 Child /Adult Protective Services (855) 444-3911 The Unemployment Insurance Agency (866) 500-0017 National Suicide Hotline (800) 273-8255 Work First (810) 966-3347 Ok 2 Say - School Safety Tip Line (855) 565-2729 Workforce Development Agency www.mighigan.gov/wda Alcohol/Addiction/Substance Abuse Education Catholic Charities of Southeast Michigan (810) 987-9100 St. Clair County RESA - Administration (810) 364-8990 Celebrate Recovery (810)479-6311 Blue Water Middle College (810) 989-5841 Center for Human Resources (810) 985-5168 TEC Center (810) 455-1010 Cornell Center (810) 987-9500 Virtual Learning Academy (810) 364-1362 Eastwood Clinics (810) 329-5340 Woodlands Developmental Center (810) 455-1011 Families Against Narcotics (810) 434-8687 Adult Education The Harbor for Youth (810) 982-8584 Baker College (810) 985-7000 Huron House (Alcohol/Drug Testing Services) (810) 984-8781 Harrison Center (high school completion & GED) (810) 455-0029 Kairos Healthcare (989) 792-5905 St. Clair County Community College (810) 984-3881 Narcotics Anonymous (NA) (877) 338-1188 Early Childhood Education Professional Counseling Center (810) 984-4202 Early On (810) 364-8990 Sacred Heart Rehabilitation Center (888) 802-7472 Head Start/ Early Head Start (810) 982-8541 St. Clair County Community Mental Health (810) 987-6911 HUB (810) 985-1970 Toll Free (888) 225-4447 Great Start Collaborative (810) 455-4397 Great Start Parent Coalition (810) 455-4443 Child & Family Services Great Start Home Visiting (866) 735-8990 Great Start Readiness Program (810) 364-8990 Great Start to Quality (877) 614-7328 Blue Water Pregnancy Care Center (810) 985-4673 School Districts Kids in Distress (810) 326-4505 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation
    People Before Freight On-time trains on host railroads 3 LATEST REPORT CARD SIGNALS NEW GOLDEN AGE OF ON-TIME TRAINS 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF A 3 Union Pacific A 4 CSX A 5 Canadian National A 6 Norfolk Southern A Average grade for all host railroads: A 4 Amtrak National Network Passengers Continue to Experience Poor On-Time Performance 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C 5 Grading National Network routes on OTP 17 of 28 State-Supported Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time State‐Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on‐time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% Capitol Corridor UP 89% New York ‐ Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% PASS Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% FAIL New York ‐ Niagara Falls CSX 70% Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple Leaf CSX 64% Wolverine NS, CN 60% Heartland Flyer BNSF 58% Carolinian CSX, NS 51% Illini / Saluki CN 37% 6 Grading National Network routes on OTP 14 of 15 Long Distance Services Fail Class I Freight Percentage of trains on‐time Long
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan's Railroad History
    Contributing Organizations The Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) wishes to thank the many railroad historical organizations and individuals who contributed to the development of this document, which will update continually. Ann Arbor Railroad Technical and Historical Association Blue Water Michigan Chapter-National Railway Historical Society Detroit People Mover Detroit Public Library Grand Trunk Western Historical Society HistoricDetroit.org Huron Valley Railroad Historical Society Lansing Model Railroad Club Michigan Roundtable, The Lexington Group in Transportation History Michigan Association of Railroad Passengers Michigan Railroads Association Peaker Services, Inc. - Brighton, Michigan Michigan Railroad History Museum - Durand, Michigan The Michigan Railroad Club The Michigan State Trust for Railroad Preservation The Southern Michigan Railroad Society S O October 13, 2014 Dear Michigan Residents: For more than 180 years, Michigan’s railroads have played a major role in the economic development of the state. This document highlights many important events that have occurred in the evolution of railroad transportation in Michigan. This document was originally published to help celebrate Michigan’s 150th birthday in 1987. A number of organizations and individuals contributed to its development at that time. The document has continued to be used by many since that time, so a decision was made to bring it up to date and keep the information current. Consequently, some 28 years later, the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT) has updated the original document and is placing it on our website for all to access. As you journey through this history of railroading in Michigan, may you find the experience both entertaining and beneficial. MDOT is certainly proud of Michigan’s railroad heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • XL Delay Keeps Sand Hills in Spotlight
    Published Nov 11, 2011 Published Friday November 11, 2011 XL delay keeps Sand Hills in spotlight By Joseph Morton and Paul Hammel WORLD-HERALD BUREAU WASHINGTON — Nebraska's Sand Hills might be an unassuming expanse of sandy-soil prairie in the deepest heart of flyover country, but the area starred Thursday in a decision to put the brakes on a controversial pipeline that has spawned a national political debate. Over and over, State Department officials cited worries about potential damage to the ecologically sensitive Sand Hills as they announced they would delay until 2013 a decision on the Keystone XL. They said they want to examine alternate routes that would avoid the Sand Hills on the pipeline's 1,700-mile path from Canada to the Texas Gulf Coast. "This is an exceptional moment for Nebraska," Gov. Dave Heineman said. "Concerns from Nebraskans have been heard." The delay comes amid a special legislative session. Nebraska lawmakers are considering a bill to require the governor's approval of pipeline routes through the state. Heineman, who has called for a rerouting of the pipeline, said Thursday's federal announcement "lessens" the legal liability facing Nebraska in passing a routing law, because the feds, and not the state, are delaying the project. Heineman said the Legislature will have to decide over the weekend whether to continue in special session. Several senators have suggested adjourning and resuming the debate during the regular session, now that the federal decision won't come until 2013. But Sen. Mike Flood of Norfolk, speaker of the Legislature, said he hasn't had time to talk to his colleagues.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Water Safe Horizons Annual Report 2015-2016
    Blue Water Safe Horizons www.bwsh.org ANNUAL REPORT 2015 -2016 CONTENTS 1 – Message From Executive Director, Diane Baur 2 – Mission & Programs 3 – Programs, Continued 4 – Program Impact 4 – Valuable Community Partnerships 5 – STEPS Program 6 – Promoting Social Change 6 – Honoring Those That Make A Difference 7 – Client Testimonials 8 – Financial Management 9 – We Need Your Help 10 – Donor Acknowledgement Message from Executive Director, Diane Baur Dear Friends, Fiscal year 2015-2016 was a demanding, yet rewarding year for Blue Water Safe Horizons. We experienced a reduction in public and governmental grants, which presented a financial challenge. The challenge was met by an increase in individual giving; however, we still fell short of our fundraising goal. Nonetheless, our dedicated staff did an incredible job at maintaining the services needed to help our community’s most vulnerable citizens; 1,138 people called our 24 hour crisis hotline, and 202 victims of domestic/intimate partner violence and their dependent children received emergency shelter at Carolyn’s Diane Baur, Executive Director Place. Pathway provided emergency shelter to 324 homeless adults Blue Water Safe Horizons and children. Additionally, 551 individuals in the St. Clair County area went from being homeless to moving into a positive housing situation. Of these, 70% moved into their own apartment or home, and the remaining 30% were permanently reunited with family and friends. In July of 2016, our Board of Directors took action to initiate a process wherein our homeless services would be transitioned to another community agency. Blue Water Safe Horizons was founded as an agency to assist victims of domestic violence and sexual assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—Senate S10479
    October 2, 2008 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — SENATE S10479 Community School District. In par- cilities. In many cases, this Federal after serving with the United States ticular, I would like to recognize the funding is used to leverage public and/ Army for 2 years. He continued his leadership of the board of education, or private local funding, so it often has service in the National Guard for 18 president Harm Eggena III, vice presi- a tremendous multiplier effect in a more years, retiring in 2005. Lynn has dent Angie Johnson, Bea Volk, Tim local school district. served in various positions within the Trettin, and Wendy Fullerton, and The West Des Moines Community VA system, most recently as the Vet- former members, Rick Demaray, Scott School District received two Harkin erans Service Center Manager at the Woodruff, Gary O’Connor, Terri Engels, fire safety grants totaling $332,011 Sioux Falls VA Regional Office. Ann Sullivan, Bill Dolan, Lisa Paulus, which it used to make fire safety re- During his tenure with the VA, Lynn and Pat Rooney. I would also like to pairs at the Walnut Creek Campus and has been an invaluable resource for recognize superintendent Steve Ward, at Fairmeadows Elementary School. veterans and their families. He has pro- former superintendent Gary Schwartz, The Federal grants have made it pos- vided important counsel and advice to director of buildings and grounds Norm sible for the district to provide quality VA officials, veterans service officers Kelly, board secretary Janice Kuhlers, and safe schools for their students. and congressional members and their Neil Fullerton, and Neil Wedeking.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolverine Service-Blue Water-Pere Marquette-Chicago-Pontiac-Port
    AMTRAK SERVICE IN MICHIGAN Effective October 31, 2016 WOLVERINE SERVICE® serving CHICAGO - KALAMAZOO BATTLE CREEK - JACKSON DETROIT - PONTIAC and intermediate stations BLUE WATERSM serving CHICAGO - KALAMAZOO BATTLE CREEK EAST LANSING - PORT HURON and intermediate stations PERE MARQUETTE® serving CHICAGO - ST. JOSEPH HOLLAND - GRAND RAPIDS and intermediate stations 1-800-USA-RAIL www.amtrak.com Amtrak is a registered service mark of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, Washington Union Station, 60 Massachusetts Ave. N.E., Washington, DC 20002. NRPC Form W22–Internet only–10/31/16. Schedules subject to change without notice. WOLVERINE SERVICE, BLUE WATER and PERE MARQUETTE Wolverine Wolverine Blue Wolverine Pere Pere Wolverine Blue Wolverine Wolverine Thruway Train Name Thruway Service Service Water Service Marquette Marquette Service Water Service Service 350 352 364 354 370 8356 Train Number 371 351 365 353 355 8651 Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Normal Days of Operation Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily Daily R B R B R B y R B R B y b R B y R B R B y R B R B b y Q å y Q å å O y Q å å O On Board Service å O y Q å å O y Q å y Q å 8364/8150 8958 8354 Connecting Thruway Number 8465 8353/8653 8555/8655 Read Down Mile Symbol Read Up 7 20A 12 50P 4 00P 6 00P 6 30P !• b 10 35P 0DpCHICAGO, IL (CT) ∑w- Ar 9 11A 10 46A 11 45A 3 57P 10 56P b 6 05A –Union Station 7 46A 1 16P 16 Hammond-Whiting, IN >w L3 09P L10 07P 1 58P 7 01P 52 Michigan City, IN (CT) > 9 33P 9 15P 89 St.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAINS. MORE CITIES. Better Service
    MORE TRAINS. MORE CITIES. Better Service. Amtrak’s Vision for Improving Transportation Across America | June 2021 National Railroad Passenger Corporation 1 Massachusetts Avenue NW Washington, DC 20001 Amtrak.com 01 Executive Summary 4 02 Introduction 8 03 The Challenges Expansion Will Address 13 04 The Solution Is Passenger Rail 20 05 The Right Conditions For Expansion 24 06 Analysis For Supporting Service Expansion 33 07 Implementation 70 08 Conclusion 73 Appendix Amtrak Route Identification Methodology 74 01 Executive Summary OVERVIEW As Amtrak celebrates 50 years of service to America, we are focused on the future and are pleased to present this comprehensive plan to develop and expand our nation’s transportation infrastructure, enhance mobility, drive economic growth and meaningfully contribute to reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. With our seventeen state partners we provide service to forty-six states, linking urban and rural areas from coast to coast. But there is so much more to be done, from providing transportation choices in more locations to reducing highway and air traffic congestion to addressing longstanding economic and social inequities. This report describes how. To achieve this vision, Amtrak proposes that the federal government invest $75 billion over fifteen years to develop and expand intercity passenger rail corridors around the nation in collaboration with our existing and new state partners. Key elements of Amtrak’s proposal include: Sustained and Flexible Funding Paths Federal Investment Leadership Amtrak proposes a combination of funding mechanisms, including Following the successful models used to develop the nation’s direct federal funding to Amtrak for corridor development and Interstate Highway System and our aviation infrastructure, Amtrak operation, and discretionary grants available to states, Amtrak proposes significant Federal financial leadership to drive the and others for corridor development.
    [Show full text]
  • Amtrak Host Railroad Report Card 2018 Who Delays Passengers?
    Amtrak Host Railroad Report Card 2018 Who delays passengers? The Host Railroad Report Card grades each of the six Class I freight host railroads based on delays caused to Amtrak trains over the last 12 months. 1 Canadian Pacific A 2 BNSF B 3 Union Pacific B- 4 CSX B- 5 Canadian National D- 6 Norfolk Southern F Average grade for all host railroads: C Grades reflect the passenger experience A Most passengers are on-time B Passengers on some routes are late C Many passengers are very late D Most passengers are very late F Majority of passengers are severely late Please see the last page for more details regarding calculations and definitions. Amtrak Route Grades 2018 How often are trains on-time at each station within 15 minutes of schedule? Class I Freight Percentage of trains on-time State-Supported Trains Route Host Railroads within 15 minutes Pass = 80% on-time Hiawatha CP 96% Keystone (other hosts) 91% 17 of 28 routes fail to Capitol Corridor UP 89% achieve 80% standard New York - Albany (other hosts) 89% Carl Sandburg / Illinois Zephyr BNSF 88% Ethan Allen Express CP 87% Pere Marquette CSX, NS 84% PASS Missouri River Runner UP 83% Springfield Shuttles (other hosts) 82% Downeaster (other hosts) 81% Hoosier State CSX 80% Pacific Surfliner BNSF, UP 78% Lincoln Service CN, UP 76% Blue Water NS, CN 75% Roanoke NS 75% Piedmont NS 74% Richmond / Newport News / Norfolk CSX, NS 74% San Joaquins BNSF, UP 73% Pennsylvanian NS 71% Adirondack CN, CP 70% New York - Niagara Falls CSX 70% FAIL Vermonter (other hosts) 67% Cascades BNSF, UP 64% Maple
    [Show full text]