State Secretariat for Religious Affairs State Secretariat for Religious Affairs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

State Secretariat for Religious Affairs State Secretariat for Religious Affairs State Secretariat for Religious Affairs STATE SECRETARIAT FOR RELIGIOUS AFFAIRS STATE and Religion in Romania 2nd Edition Revised and Added translated by Della L. Marcus Bucharest 2019 2 State and Religion in Romania © 2019 State Secretariat for Religious Affairs web: www.culte.gov.ro e-mail: [email protected] tel.: +40.21.318.81.53; +40.21.318.81.54 fax.: +40.21.318.81.51; +40.21.318.81.60 Descrierea CIP a Bibliotecii Naţionale a României State and Religion in Romania / Secretariatul de Stat pentru Culte.–Bucureşti: Litera, 2019 ISBN 978-606-33-3759-8 I. Secretariatul de Stat pentru Culte (Bucureşti) 2 CONTENT Introduction .....................................................................................................................5 1. What is the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs?. ...................................................9 2. Short Institutional History ........................................................................................15 3. Evolution of the Religious Affiliation Structure........................................................27 4. What Church-State relations exist in democratic countries? ...................................39 5. Publicly Debated Issues ............................................................................................97 6. Religious organizations.......................................... ....................................................127 7. Legislation Relating to Religious Life ......................................................................165 Annexes ....................................................................................................................... 211 Glossary .......................................................................................................................217 Translator’s note ...........................................................................................................219 Bibliography ................................................................................................................221 4 INTroDUcTION This book is an overview by the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs of several issues being debated in connection with the status of religion in society, and specifically of those religions recognized by the Romanian State. The relationship between the State and recog- nized religions, especially with the Romanian Orthodox Church, has become the focus of some public figures, politicians, and the media. Through our activities, including the publication of this work, we wish to contribute to a balanced debate based on concrete data, legisla- tion, and an understanding of the historic evolution of the relation- ship between the State and faith organizations in our country. We are talking about constitutive elements of national identity, whose com- plexity requires an objective approach, as an essential condition for civil, argument-driven debate. The State Secretariat for Religious Affairs knows how to carry out its mission as principal institution through which the Romanian State defines, articulates, and puts into practice pub- lic policies having to do with religious life in Romania, and wish- es to facilitate an honest dialogue, open to all interested parties. This book, compiled by the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs in collaboration with the Ministry for Foreign Affairs through the Romanian Embassies in the North Atlantic region, the National Institute for Statistics, and the National Authority for the Restitution of Properties, makes available to the public a series of data and information that will provide a deeper understanding of the relationship between the State and the various religions from a historic perspective and within a European context. This book is intended to be a working instrument for po- litical decision-makers, the diplomatic corps, civil servants di- rectly involved with such matters, as well as religious leaders. Moreover, this volume is destined for researchers who are con- cerned with the Romanian religious phenomenon, and for civil society players who are directly interested in the improvement of the functioning of the Romanian political and judicial system. 6 First, we wish to offer through this book some clarification of the status of the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs as part of and its role within the central public administration, and an in- cursion into its history as a key institution in the modern State’s relation with the manifestation of various religious phenome- non in Romania. Second, we would also like to provide the pub- lic relevant statistical data to help it understand the evolution of the religious structures of the modern Romanian population. The Romanian model of church-state relations, as it is de- fined by Law 489/2006 on Freedom of Religion and the General Status of Religions, is part of the European family of models of church-state relations, central to which are religious freedom and the principle of state neutrality with respect to the manifestations of religious phenomenon. As is the case also in other European countries, relations between the state and organized forms of re- ligious life in Romania have been developed based on historic, legal, and local institutional traditions, while taking into account existing European models, as well as the demographic situation, social and spiritual needs, and society’s current expectations. An overview of the main themes related to the church-state relation- ship, currently under debate and part of the public agenda, illus- trates the stakes yet to be clarified within Romanian society and the political system. In short, the scope of this book is a clarifica- tion of the place and role of religion in the public space. In order to better understand the main players in Romania’s religious life and the role these have had and are playing in Romanian society, this book offers a short description of the cur- rent situation and activities of recognized religions and religious associations in Romania. Far from being isolated in the private sphere and the liturgical space, one can observe that almost all of these have understood that they must play an active part in vari- ous areas. Whether we speak about education, charitable activi- ties, social or medical services, or cultural projects, organized faiths in Romania are acting as significant players in the public space. The chapter in the previous edition of this book (2015) dedicated to the relationship between the state and religious organizations in Europe has been restructured and expanded. In this way we wish to draw a comparison between the consonance of the Romanian model with the practices in the different European countries in terms of relations between church and state and the place these 7 have in terms of tradition and the legal and political practices of democratic countries. The end of the book contains a selection of legislation in effect in this area which should prove to be a useful instrument for those wishing to understand the way in which the Romanian state relates to the activities of faiths in Romania. To date, the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs has pub- lished several editions of a book on religious life in Romania (in Romanian in 1993, 1999, 2005, 2008, and 2014, and in English in 1999, 2005, and 2015). Because the previous editions were so well received by the religious organizations as well as by decision-mak- ers, the diplomatic corps, universities, etc., this current edition has been expanded, and it focuses on an explanation of the role and contribution of the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs in the de- velopment and administration of the relationship between church and state in Romania. This is the reason why space allocated to legislation and a detailed presentation of the religious organiza- tions has been reduced in favour of greater historical and statisti- cal information and a presentation of the vision of the institution on matters that are presently being publicly debated and which di- rectly affect the dynamic of the relationship between the state and religious organizations. All the data and information carried over from the above-mentioned previous editions has been updated. The data is also presented in a more accessible graphic form. Within the European and Romanian context in which there is increasing talk of a significant rise in the level of religious illiter- acy, as well as an increase in the level of religious illiteracy regard- ing religious freedom, we believe that the publication of this book is a contribution to a better understanding of religious life and es- pecially a duty to raise public awareness about religious freedom as a fundamental, constitutional right at the root of democracy. Likewise, through the publication of this volume in 2019 the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs wishes to contribute to a success- ful Romanian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, by highlighting the fundamental role which religions have had and still have today, both historically and at present, in the building of a better, more democratic, and more unitive society. Victor Opaschi State Secretary for Religious Affairs May 2019 8 CHAPTER 1 What is the State Secretariat for Religious Affairs? The State Secretariat for Religious Affairs (SSRA) is a special- ized, central, public administration body, a legal entity, subor- dinate to the government, and coordinated by the Romanian Prime Minister. 1.1. What are the objectives of the State
Recommended publications
  • No. 279, MARCH - APRIL 2020
    No. 279, MARCH - APRIL 2020 Motto:”Opinions are free, but not mandatory“ I.L.Caragiale 1 CONTENT Geostrategic Pulse, No 279, March - April 2020 45 Opinion: COVID-19 I. EDITORIAL IV. THE WESTERN Pandemic Impact on Defence BALKANS 3 Leadership and Trust 75 China Is Not Replacing the West in Serbia Ciprian-Mircea RĂDULESCU Constantin IACOBIȚĂ III. THE EUROPEAN UNION Jelena MILIĆ II. INTERNATIONAL 77 Old and New Challenges SITUATION 47 Interview : “The High to the European and Euro- Level of Interdependence of Atlantic Integration of the Today’s Globalised World Is 4 The Political Narratives of Countries in the Western Reflected in the Geopolitical a Global Crisis: Competing Balkans. The Western Articulation of the European Ideologies and Strategical Ri- Balkans – Always Something Commission” valries in the Symbolic Man- “Different” from the Rest of agement of the COVID-19 Cri- Europe sis Alexandru PETRESCU V. THE MEDITERANEAN SEE 87 Military Cooperation Alexis CHAPELAN Mihnea MOTOC between Israel, Greece and 20 A Very Distant and Lonely 50 Interview: “The Brexit Cyprus World Earthquake Was Read Differ- Eugene KOGAN ently Not Just by the Leaders V. THE MIDDLE EAST of the Member States, but al- so by the EU Leaders” 93 Idlib: Another Monstrous Face of the Syrian War Dumitru CHICAN Dumitru CHICAN 23 The Politics of Fear and 96 The Palestinians and the Loathing. Coming to Terms “Deal of the Century” - No with a Decade of Radical Dis- Sergiu MIȘCOIU News, No Deal content and Liberal Malaise 52 Romania and Hungary - Dinu COSTESCU Two Geographically Close Alexis CHAPELAN Neighbours. The Romanian- 98 Afghanistan: from Hungarian Relations between “Enduring Freedom” to 39 The Prisons – Potential 1918 and 2018 “Enduring Peace” Sources for the Expansion of Dumitru CHICAN COVID-19 VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Relations Between Russian Federation and Republic of Moldova
    Євгенія Блажевська. Досвід організації спільної імміграційної політики ЄС … 49 11Rapport «Besoins de main d’oeuvre et politique 13Сутормина Л.А. Правовй статус гpaждан тре- migratoire». Centre d’analyse stratégique. – Mars, тьих стран, проживающих в Европейском союзе на 2006. − P. 5-57. [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим долгосрочной основе // Мировая политика: взгляд доступу: http://lesrapports.ladocumentationfrancaise. с университетской скамьи. М., 2009. − С. 86-107. fr/BRP/ 064000296/0000. pdf. 14Rostek К., Gareth D. The impact of Union 12Favell A. The Europeanisation of Immigration citizenship on national citizenship policies // European Politics// European Integration online Papers (EloP). – Intcitialion online Papers (EloP). – 2006. − Vol.10, 1998. − Vol.2., №10. [Електронний ресурс]. – Ре- № 5. − P. 27-28 [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим жим доступу: http://eiop.or.at/ei-op/pdf/1998- доступу: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/iiulf4php/iiop/article/ 010.pdf. viewFile/2006_005a/22. УДК: 327 (470+571:478)(091) © Igor Chiosa (м. Кишинів) RELATIONS BETWEEN MOLDOVA AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW Republica Moldova este un stat mic situat din Igor Chiosa. Relations between Moldova and punct de vedere geografic în sud-estul Europei. În the Russian Federation: historical overview. Re- pofida unui teritoriu mic, acest tânăr stat are o istorie public of Moldova, from a geographical point of view, bogată și pe alocuri controversată. Teritoriu românesc is a small country in south eastern Europe. Contrary to din cele mai vechi timpuri, și făcînd parte din vechea a small area, this young state has a rich history and Țară a Moldovei, spațiul Pruto-Nistrean a fsot ocupat sometimes even contradictory. în anul 1812 de către Imperiul Țarist, iar ulterior de Despite independence, the young nation struggling URSS în 1940 și din nou în 1944.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereby Lost the War.” – Admiral Hara Tadaichi
    MANHATTAN The View from Los Alamos of History’s Most Secret Project UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED | 1 Hitler and Stalin Start WWII ▪ Hitler and Stalin secretly divided Poland in August 1939 ▪ Germany invaded Poland on September 1st ▪ The Soviet Union invaded Poland on September 17th ▪ Britain and France declared war on Germany, but maintained neutrality with the Soviets ▪ In November, the Stalin invaded Finland ▪ The Soviet Union annexed Bessarabia, Northern Bukovina, and the Hertza region of Romania in June 1940 ▪ Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia were forcefully annexed into the Soviet Union in August 1940 UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED | 2 German Aggression, 1940-1941 ▪ Germany invaded Denmark and Norway in April 1940 ▪ The following month, the Germans attacked Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, and France ▪ Italy declared war on Britain and France on June 10th ▪ The Battle of Britain began in early August and ended in October ▪ In the spring of 1941, the Germans invaded the Balkans ▪ The Germans attacked the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941 ▪ By late 1941, the German advance was finally halted at the gates of Moscow UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S. Department of Energy's NNSA UNCLASSIFIED | 3 War Breaks-Out in the Pacific ▪ On December 7, 1941, the Japanese attacked the United States Pacific Fleet at Pearl Harbor ▪ The United States and Britain immediately declared war on Japan ▪ Japan invaded the Philippines on December 8th ▪ On December 11th, Germany and Italy declared war on the United States ▪ “We won a great tactical victory at Pearl Harbor and thereby lost the war.” – Admiral Hara Tadaichi UNCLASSIFIED Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Peace: “Reset” and Coexistence
    The Northeast Asian Economic Review Vol. 2, No. 1, March 2014 39 Cold Peace: “Reset” and Coexistence Steven Rosefielde* Abstract American international relations with Russia until recently were governed by the Obama administration’s “reset policy.” Its goal was to work with the Kremlin to construct a harmonious global order based on democracy, free enterprise and universal human rights. This objective wasn’t realized. The policy instead led to contentious engagement, and has been “paused.” The failure was caused by both sides’ overzealous double gaming, and raises the prospect of renewed cold war. The danger can be averted on a second best basis by both camps committing themselves to the principles of “coexistence,” and mutual self-restraint. Keywords: cold peace, cold war, coexistence, reset Vladimir Putin has steadfastly refused to comply with Washington’s and Brussels’s reset script.1 He hasn’t been enticed by American democratic free enterprise, or EU social democratic rhetoric, and he refuses to be swept away by a “Moscow Spring.”2 Moreover, Putin can barely hide his contempt for western hypocrisy.3 In the hallowed Soviet tradition, he sees the west as a fading power.4 America’s and the EU’s performance since 2008 has reinforced this belief. The Obama administration, after five years of denial has begun to recognize that something is amiss in its American-Russian partnership campaign. Stung by its inability to prevent Putin from granting Edward Snowden asylum,5 Washington has recently decided to “pause and reassess,” 6 a chill subsequently deepened by Russia’s stout support for Syria during America’s confrontation with Bashar al-Assad over his alleged use of chemical weapons against civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • The Eastern Dimension of the United Europe
    UNIVERSITY OF ŁÓDŹ Department of Political Geography and Regional Studies GOVERNMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE Silesian Institute in Opole SILESIAN INSTITUTE SOCIETY THE EASTERN DIMENSION OF THE UNITED EUROPE Political and economical aspects of the Eastern politics of the European Union REGION AND REGIONALISM No. 11 vol. 2 edited by Krystian Heffner Łódź–Opole 2013 REVIEWER prof. dr hab. Stanisław Koziarski prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Marszał MANAGING EDITOR Anna Araszkiewicz COVER Marek Jastrzębski MAPS AND FIGURES Anna Wosiak ENGLISH VERIFICATION BY Jarosław Sawiuk The publication co-financed from founds of the National Science Centre granted based on decision no. DEC-2011/01/B/HS4/02609 and the Minister of Science and Higher Education ISBN 978-83-7126-293-7 978-83-7511-173-6 PAŃSTWOWY INSTYTUT NAUKOWY – INSTYTUT ŚLĄSKI W OPOLU WYDAWNICTWO INSTYTUT ŚLĄSKI Sp. z o.o. CONTENTS Foreword (Krystian HEFFNER) ............................................................................ 5 Section I POLITICAL ASPECTS OF THE EASTERN 9 POLITICS OF THE EU Alessandro VITALE The EU's predominant concept of inside/outside dimensions, the stop of enlargements, and the Eastern European deadlock ............................................ 11 Roman SZUL The West (the EU and NATO) and its eastern neighbours: fading interests, weakening ties? ....................................................................................................... 23 Katarzyna LE ŚNIEWSKA The socio-political situation of Poles in Vilnius after the accession of Lithuania to the EU ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE BORDERS of GREATER ROMANIA Ion M. ANGHEL
    Annals of the Academy of Romanian Scientists Series on History and Archaeology ISSN 2067-5682 Volume 8, Number 1/2016 31 THE BORDERS OF GREATER ROMANIA Ion M. ANGHEL* Motto: I dedicate this study to the Centenary of the Great Union, as sign of profound respect, admiration and gratitude that I feel for all those who sacrificed themselves so that we, their descendants, can rejoice in the mighty realization of this centuries-old dream of Romanians. Abstract. The importance of state frontiers is outlined by the evolution of international life, even these days, when the European Union faces waves of immigrants coming from Asia, which is a hard test for the viability of the European Union. Thus, any underestimation of the role frontiers play in the relationships between states, as well as their effects on human beings, has nothing to do with reality, and the slogans that go before realities are disqualifying; a world in which there is circulation of people and communication between them – facilitated and encouraged by the state – is not necessarily a world without frontiers, but a world with properly operating ones. Keywords: borders, frontiers, the European Union, greater Romania 1. A discourse on frontiers – limes (state frontiers, especially) – an analysis, a presentation, a few comments or mere references to the topic – could be considered, now, when EU no longer requires any controls within its internal borders, as something unusual, amiss and anachronistic, by Europe enthusiasts – people of the world, claiming to be modern, advanced and without prejudice, when in fact – this is my opinion, of course – their vision is ordinary, superficial and even infatuated, wishy-washy and worse.
    [Show full text]
  • Ukraine's Foreign and Security Policy 1991-2000
    Ukraine’s Foreign and Security Policy 1991–2000 This book analyses Ukraine’s relations with each of its neighbours in its first decade of independence. It examines the degree to which these relations fitted into Ukraine’s broad objective of reorienting its key political ties from East to West, and assesses the extent to which Ukraine succeeded in achieving this reorientation. It shows how in the early days of independence Ukraine fought off threats from Russia and Romania to its territorial integrity, and how it made progress in establishing good relations with its western neighbours as a means of moving closer toward Central European sub-regional and European regional organisations. It also shows how the sheer breadth and depth of its economic and military ties to Russia dwarfed Ukraine’s relations with all other neighbours, resulting in a foreign and security policy which attempted to counterbalance the competing forces of East and West. Roman Wolczuk is a specialist on Ukrainian foreign and security policy. He has written extensively on Ukraine’s international relations since independence and is a regular contributor to Jane’s Sentinel on Ukrainian Affairs. BASEES/RoutledgeCurzon Series on Russian and East European Studies Series editor Richard Sakwa, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent Editorial committee George Blazyca, Centre for Contemporary European Studies, University of Paisley Terry Cox, Department of Government, University of Strathclyde Rosalind Marsh, Department of European Studies and Modern Languages, University of Bath David Moon, Department of History, University of Strathclyde Hilary Pilkington, Centre for Russian and East European Studies, University of Birmingham Stephen White, Department of Politics, University of Glasgow This series is published on behalf of BASEES (the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies).
    [Show full text]
  • The Italian Resistance Between History and Memory
    Journal of Modern Italian Studies ISSN: 1354-571X (Print) 1469-9583 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rmis20 The Italian resistance between history and memory Paolo Pezzino To cite this article: Paolo Pezzino (2005) The Italian resistance between history and memory, Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 10:4, 396-412, DOI: 10.1080/13545710500314090 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/13545710500314090 Published online: 20 Aug 2006. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 1638 Citing articles: 11 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rmis20 Journal of Modern Italian Studies 10(4) 2005: 396 – 412 ARTICLES The Italian Resistance between history and memory Paolo Pezzino Universita` di Pisa Abstract Since the 1960s the Resistance has held pride of place in public ceremonial, political debate and to a point also in historcial writing in Italy. The emphasis on its popular and national character transformed the Resistance into the struggle of the whole country to rid Italy of the German invaders and the small number of Italian fascists who remained their allies, but in ways that took no account of the complexity of people’s reactions and the different ways in which Italians experienced the years immediately after the fall of fascism. In the last decade, however, numerous accounts have been published that contradict the images of the Resistance that for 30 years have constituted the ‘official’ memory of the Italian Republic. As a result, the Resistance offers a classic example of the ‘public use of history’, in which historical interpretation has served primarily to justify party political, instutitional and idelogical ends.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Mobility, Return for Development and Sense of Europe: Narratives of Moldavian Immigrants Returning from the European
    REMHU - Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana ISSN: 1980-8585 [email protected] Centro Scalabriniano de Estudos Migratórios Brasil Marcu, Silvia Mobility, return for development and sense of Europe: narratives of Moldavian immigrants returning from the European Union REMHU - Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, vol. 21, núm. 41, julio- diciembre, 2013, pp. 77-98 Centro Scalabriniano de Estudos Migratórios Brasília, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=407042018005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Silvia Marcu MOBILITY, RETURN FOR DEVELOPMENT AND SENSE OF EUROPE: NARRATIVES OF MOLDAVIAN IMMIGRANTS RETURNING FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION Silvia Marcu * The article links migration, cross-border mobility and return for development embedded in terms of identity and approach to sense of Europe. Taking into account the global changes in Moldova, the paper examines the perceptions of mobility, return and identity of the Moldovans engaged in emigration in the countries of the European Union (EU). Utilising a multi-discipline approach and an in-depth qualitative interview technique, this article seeks to analyze how mobility and return can support social change and development of the country, and argues that people, who cross EU borders, living through the experience of emigration, acquire a pro-European mentality. Keywords: mobility, border, Moldova, return, development, European Union. Introduction 1 Over the last two decades, there have been profound transformations in the territory and society of Eastern Europe, characterized by three fundamental factors that interact with each other: mobility, identity and development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact and the Emergence of the “Molodovan” Nation: Reflections After 70 Years*
    ISSN 2029-0225 THE MOLOTOV-RIBBENTROP PACT AND THE EMERGENCE OF THE “MOLODOVAN” NATION: REFLECTIONS AFTER 70 YEARS* OCTAVIAN D. TICU Doctor, director, Institute of History and political science. Free Moldova University [email protected] The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact led to the Soviet annexation of Bessarabia from Romania. Immediately after the Soviet occupation, Bessarabia was to be joined to the Moldovan ASSR, and become the Moldovan SSR under control of Moscow and the Soviet Union had created for the Romanians from Bessarabia (intentionally presented as Moldovans) a ter- ritorial nation The present paper aims explicitly to analyze the Moldovan nation building policies during the Soviet period and the complexity of consequences which derived from Soviet occupation for the sense of Romanian identity in Bessarabia. Key words: Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, Soviet Union, Romania, “Moldovenism”, Nation-Building, Bessarabia. NTRODUCTION The Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, signed in Moscow in the early hours of 24 August 1939 (but dated 23 August), included a secret protocol di- viding Northern and Eastern Europe into German and Soviet spheres of influence, anticipating potential “territorial and political rearrange- ments” of these countries. Thereafter, Germany and the Soviet Union invaded their respective sides of Poland, dividing the country between them. Part of eastern Finland was annexed by the Soviet Union after 7 Octavian D. TICU an attempted invasion. This was followed by Soviet annexations of Es- tonia, Latvia, Lithuania and eastern and northern Romania. On 26 June 1940, four days after France sued for an armistice with the Third Reich, the Soviet Union issued an ultimatum demanding Bessarabia and, unexpectedly, Northern Bukovina from Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Oblast = Judeţul Suceava
    Oblast = Judeţul Suceava Bucovina de Sud în cadrul judeţului Suceava Județul este compus din 5 municipii, 11 orașe și 97 de comune (2005). Municipii [modificare | modificare sursă ] • Suceava (reședința județului) • Fălticeni • Rădăuți • Câmpulung Moldovenesc • Vatra Dornei Orașe [modificare | modificare sursă ] • Gura Humorului • Siret • Solca • Broșteni (2004) • Cajvana (2004) • Dolhasca (2004) • Frasin (2004) • Liteni (2004) • Milișăuți (2004) • Salcea (2004) • Vicovu de Sus (2004) Comune [modificare | modificare sursă ] • Gălănești • Ciprian • Grămești • Mușenița • Sucevița • Adâncata Porumbescu • Grănicești • Ostra • Șaru Dornei • Arbore • Comănești • Hănțești • Păltinoasa • Șcheia • Baia • Cornu Luncii • Hârtop • Panaci • Șerbăuți • Bălăceana • Coșna • Horodnic de • Pârteștii de • Todirești • Bălcăuți • Crucea Jos Jos • Udești • Berchișești • Dărmănești • Horodnic de • Pătrăuți • Ulma • Bilca • Dolhești Sus • Poiana • Vadu • Bogdănești • Dorna-Arini • Horodniceni Stampei Moldovei • Boroaia • Dorna • Iacobeni • Poieni-Solca • Valea • Bosanci Candrenilor • Iaslovăț • Pojorâta Moldovei • Botoșana • Dornești • Ilișești • Preutești • Vama • Breaza • Drăgoiești • Ipotești • Putna • Vatra • Brodina • Drăgușeni • Izvoarele • Rădășeni Moldoviței • Bunești • Dumbrăveni Sucevei • Râșca • Verești • Burla • Fântâna Mare • Mălini • Sadova • Vicovu de • Cacica • Fântânele • Mănăstirea • Satu Mare Jos • Calafindești • Forăști Humorului • Siminicea • Voitinel • Capu • Frătăuții Noi • Marginea • Slatina • Volovăț Câmpului • Frătăuții Vechi • Mitocu
    [Show full text]
  • Ukrainian Bilateral Relations (1992-2006) Ivan, Ruxandra
    www.ssoar.info Patterns of cooperation and conflict: Romanian- Ukrainian bilateral relations (1992-2006) Ivan, Ruxandra Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Ivan, R. (2007). Patterns of cooperation and conflict: Romanian-Ukrainian bilateral relations (1992-2006). Studia Politica: Romanian Political Science Review, 7(1), 133-153. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-56034-3 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/1.0/deed.de Patterns of Cooperation and Conflict 133 Patterns of Cooperation and Conflict Romanian-Ukrainian Bilateral Relations (1992-2006) RUXANDRA IVAN The purpose of this paper is to examine the evolution of the relation between two neighbor countries in Eastern Europe: Romania and Ukraine, in order to un- derstand the patterns of conflict and cooperation that emerged between them in the last fourteen years. While both States can be said geographically belonging to Europe, the political aspects of their positioning are not very obvious. Romania is a former communist country, placed in the sphere of influence of the Soviet Union after the Second World War, but having had a ”non-conventional” foreign policy during the communist regime. In 2006, as we speak, Romania is a NATO member country, and is expecting an answer from the EU as to the date of its accession.
    [Show full text]