DOCSLIB.ORG

Foreign Military Studies Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Foreign Military Studies Office community.apan.org/wg/tradoc-g2/fmso/ Foreign Military Studies Office Volume 8 Issue #10 OEWATCH October 2018 FOREIGN NEWS & PERSPECTIVES OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT VOSTOK-2018 MANEUVERS EURASIA INDO-PACIFIC AFRICA 3 Reasoning for the Vostok-2018 Strategic Exercise 34 China Stands by Re-education Camps in Xinjiang 61 The African Union Diminishes Its Role in the Western Sahara 6 Vostok-2018 in the Arctic 35 China Building a Military Facility in the Wakhan Corridor: Crisis 9 Increasing Multi-Domain Capabilities: The Iskander draftFact or Fiction? 62 Mysterious Kidnappings in Lake Chad Region Engages the Sea 36 India to Use New Drones at Border with China 63 Violence in Africa: Trends and Drivers 11 Establishing the Gauntlet 37 India’s Appointment of the 14th Corps Commander 64 The ISIS-affiliated Boko Haram Faction Reclaims Territory 12 The Automation of Forward Air Control 38 “New Type” PLA Units Emphasize Mobility, Joint 65 Nigerian Navy’s Rapid Growth Includes Addition of More Fast 13 Current Lessons-Learned From the Battle of Kursk Operations Patrol Boats 14 Constructing Military Ideology... and a Military Church 39 Can China Produce Micro Precision Strike Weapons? 66 South Africa’s New Chief of Police: Concern of a “War Zone” 15 Connecting Slavic Brotherhood and the Russian Army 40 PLA Army Aviation Brigades’ Training Now Includes Urban 67 Eritrea: Why Peace with Ethiopia May Not Translate into 16 Revisiting Russia’s Seizure of Kosovo Airport Operations Domestic Reforms 17 Russian Pipeline Troops: Sustaining the Fight Across the 41 History of China’s Type 99 Main Battle Tank 68 Somalia: A Fractured Nation Might Fracture Further Land and From the Sea 43 Mianyang: The Bellwether in China’s Civil-Military 19 Time Management and Re-Enlistment Integration Initiative 20 Prime Training Time in Tiksi Bay 44 Indonesia Counters Street Gangs Before Asian Games LATIN AMERICA 69 Huge New Study of the Colombian War 21 Consolidating Naval Training at Kronshtadt? 45 Thailand Acquires Chinese Submarines 70 Armed Drones in Mexico 22 No Pirates in the Arctic 46 South Korea Launches New Submarine 71 Jalisco New Generation Cartel Announces Arrival in Salamanca 23 China Builds Icebreaker at Home 47 The Future of Korea’s Military 72 El Salvador Breaks Diplomatic Ties with Taiwan 24 Rising Russian-Ukrainian Tensions in the Sea of Azov 48 South Korean Special Forces in the UAE 73 China’s Growing Influence on the Latin American Economy 26 Prelude to Religious Conflict in Ukraine? 74 How Nicaragua’s Political Instability is Affecting Costa Rica 27 Georgia Seeks to Build a Reserve—Again 75 New FARC War Structure 28 The CSTO Factor in Armenian-Russian Relations MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA 49 Saudis Seek Pathway to the Arabian Sea 76 Spanish-Colombian Relations and Catalonia? 30 EU Holds 3rd Annual “Three Seas Initiative” Summit in 51 Iranian Private Sector to Assist in Rebuilding Syria? Bucharest 52 Deepening Russian Cultural Influence in Syria 31 Russian Influence Operations Target Swedish Elections 53 Normalization of Turkey and KRG Relations 32 Tajik-Uzbek Border Guards Conduct Joint Exercise 54 The Range of Iranian Missiles 33 Risky Business: A Case Study of PRC Investment in 55 Turkey to Establish Naval Base in Cyprus Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan 56 Commander of Iranian Armed Forces: Khamenei is the Ultimate Authority 57 Radicalization and “ISIS Networks” in Turkey 58 Turkish President Announced 48 Defense Projects 59 Morocco Grows Military, Reinstates Obligatory Service 60 Defense or Domination? Building Algerian Power With Russian Arms approved for public release; distribution is unlimited The Foreign Military Studies Office (FMSO) at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, is part of the US Army Training and Doctrine Command G-2, whose mission is to Understand, Describe, Deliver, and OEWATCH Assess the conditions of the Operational Foreign News & Perspectives Environment. For over 30 years, FMSO of the Operational Environment has conducted open source research Volume 8 | Issue 10 October | 2018 on foreign perspectives of defense and security issues, emphasizing those topics that are understudied or unconsidered. Regional Analysts and Operational Environment Watch Expert Contributors provides translated selections with background from a diverse range Eurasia Danny Anderson Chuck Bartles of foreign media that our analysts Dodge Billingsley and expert contributors believe will Matti Dimmick give security professionals an added Ray Finch Les Grau dimension to their critical thinking Robert Kurz about the Operational Environment. Andrew McGregor Matthew Stein Boris Vainer The views expressed in each article are those of Tom Wilhelm the author and do not represent the official policy or position of the Department of the Army, Department Indo-Pacific Cindy Hurst of Defense, or the US Government. Release of this Brent Stedry information does not imply any commitment or intent Matthew Stein on the part of the US Government to provide any Peter Wood additional information on any topic presented herein. Jacob Zenn The appearance of hyperlinks does not constitute endorsement by the US Army of the referenced site Middle East, North Africa Ihsan Gunduz or the information, products, or services contained Michael Rubin therein. Users should exercise caution in accessing Lucas Winter hyperlinks. Africa Robert Feldman The Operational Environment Watch is archived Jacob Zenn and available at: https://community.apan.org/wg/ tradoc-g2/fmso/. Latin America Robert Bunker Geoff Demarest Brenda Fiegel Alma Keshavarz Catalina Wedman ON THE COVER: “Active phase of Vostok 2018 maneuvers.” Image Source: Russian Ministry of Defense, http://eng.mil.ru/en/multimedia/photo/gallery.htm?id=60528@ cmsPhotoGallery, CC 4.0. Editor-in-Chief Tom Wilhelm Editor Matthew Stein Design Editor Lucas Winter EURASIA Reasoning for the Vostok-2018 Strategic Exercise OE Watch Commentary: Russia conducted the Vostok-2018 strategic exercises 11-17 September 2018 and according to Defense Minister General Sergey Shoygu, approximately 300,000 servicemen (approximately one-third of the Ministry of Defense’s uniformed personnel); 36,000 tanks, armored personnel carriers, and other combat vehicles; more than 1,000 helicopters, aircraft, and drones; and ships and auxiliary vessels of the Northern and Pacific Fleets took part in the maneuvers. In addition, approximately 3,000 military personnel from the Peoples Republic of China (PRC) and several units from Mongolia also participated. The accompanying excerpted article from Svobodnaya Pressa, lays out some reasoning behind the exercise. The article points out that these annual major exercises shift on a yearly basis from military district to military district, and discusses parallels between Vostok-2018 and Vostok-1981. One commonality, from the author’s perspective, is that both exercises were conducted during particularly contentious relations with the West and were intended to deter (through their sheer size), but not provoke (due to them not being near a current hot-spot). The accompanying excerpted article from Vzglyad, lays out varying opinions regarding whether the Vostok-2018 exercise is Syria related. Prominent journalist and military expert Pavel Felgengauer is somewhat cynical of this view, pointing out: “It is difficult to use what was employed in Syria in the large-scale operations, which are being tested at the maneuvers.” The article from Gazeta.ru is perhaps the most interesting of the articles as it sheds some light on Russian terminology differences. In particular, strategic command-staff exercises [стратегические командно-штабные учения] are considered to be front-level operations occurring at the operational-strategic level of military activity, since they primarily involve just a single military district/joint strategic command, but maneuvers [маневры] are larger (strategic) in nature and involve multiple military districts and fleets in the context of a continental Theater of Military Operations (TVD) [театр военных действий (ТВД)]. Due to the scale of the Vostok-2018 exercise, it would be considered a ‘maneuver’ by this definition. End OE Watch Commentary (Bartles) “It is unlikely that 300,000 soldiers and commanders, off-shore ships, and Long Range Aviation will be involved to combat strictly terrorists, even international terrorists.” Vostok-2018 Strategic Exercise. Source: Russian Defense Ministry, http://мультимедиа.минобороны.рф/multimedia/photo/gallery.htm?id=60539@cmsPhotoGallery, CC 4.0. (continued) OE Watch | October 2018 3 EURASIA Continued: Reasoning for the Vostok-2018 Strategic Exercise Source: Sergey Ishchenko, “Восток-2018: Россия начинает репетицию Третьей мировой (Vostok-2018: Russia Is Beginning Dress Rehearsals for World War III),” Svobodnaya Pressa, 8 September 2018. https://svpressa.ru/war21/article/210128/ …In a word, what has already begun in Siberia, the Far East, and Arctic and Pacific waters is making an unprecedented impression on the whole world. For there has not been this scale of movement of troops in our country’s Armed Forces for almost four decades. Since the time of the Soviet Zapad-1981 exercises…the main narrative of the Zapad-1981 exercises was the start of a big war on the continent. What are we now about to rehearse at Vostok-2018? Both with us and in the West the majority of specialists are certain that today also we are, in actual fact, preparing for exactly the same thing. There was recently, for example, an article on the upcoming exercises in the German business newspaper Handelsblatt. The authors
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2019 China Military Power Report
    OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China ANNUAL REPORT TO CONGRESS Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 Office of the Secretary of Defense Preparation of this report cost the Department of Defense a total of approximately $181,000 in Fiscal Years 2018-2019. This includes $12,000 in expenses and $169,000 in DoD labor. Generated on 2019May02 RefID: E-1F4B924 OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China Annual Report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China 2019 A Report to Congress Pursuant to the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, as Amended Section 1260, “Annual Report on Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China,” of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, Public Law 115-232, which amends the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, Section 1202, Public Law 106-65, provides that the Secretary of Defense shall submit a report “in both classified and unclassified form, on military and security developments involving the People’s Republic of China. The report shall address the current and probable future course of military-technological development of the People’s Liberation Army and the tenets and probable development of Chinese security strategy and military strategy, and of the military organizations and operational concepts supporting such development over the next 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Military Reform in the People's Republic of China
    BELFER CENTER PAPER 2015 Military Reform in the People’s Republic of China Defense, Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues Andrei A. Kokoshin PAPER OCTOBER 2016 Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs Harvard Kennedy School 79 JFK Street Cambridge, MA 02138 www.belfercenter.org Translated from Russian by Kirill Leonov Edited by Mari Dugas Design & Layout by Andrew Facini Cover image: A Chinese military band conductor leads the band at the end of the opening session of the annual National People’s Congress in Beijing’s Great Hall of the People, Saturday, March 5, 2016. (AP Photo/Ng Han Guan) Statements and views expressed in this paper are solely those of the author and do not imply endorsement by Harvard University, Harvard Kennedy School, or the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Copyright 2016, President and Fellows of Harvard College Printed in the United States of America BELFER CENTER PAPER 2015 Military Reform in the People’s Republic of China Defense, Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues Andrei A. Kokoshin PAPER OCTOBER 2016 About the Author Andrei Kokoshin is a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences and dean of Moscow State University’s Faculty of World Politics. He has served as Russia’s first deputy defense minister, secretary of the Defense Council and secretary of the Security Council. Dr. Kokoshin has also served as chairman of the State Duma’s Committee on the Commonwealth of Independent States and as first deputy chairman of the Duma’s Committee on Science and High Technology. iv 2015 Military Reform in the People’s Republic of China: Defense, Foreign and Domestic Policy Issues Table of Contents Synopsis of the Study .............................................................vi Introduction .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PUTIN's FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD SYRIA Mark N
    PUTIN'S FOREIGN POLICY TOWARD SYRIA Mark N. Katz* This article examines why Russian-Syrian relations were not especially close during the first five years of Putin's presidency and why the relationship suddenly improved at the beginning of 2005. It will also examine how Putin has sought to maintain good relations with Syria and Israel simultaneously, and how various future scenarios might affect Russian-Syrian relations. Despite their many common interests Why did their relationship suddenly (including opposition to American improve at the beginning of 2005? Can Putin "hegemony" in general and to the American- maintain good relations simultaneously with led intervention in neighboring Iraq in Syria and Israel even though hostility particular), Russian-Syrian relations have not between these two countries remains strong? been particularly close during most of the Where do Russian-Syrian relations appear to Putin era. Russian-Israeli relations, by be headed? Each of these questions will be contrast, became very close under both Putin addressed in turn. and Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon. Since Syrian President Bashar Assad met FLOUNDERING AT FIRST with Russian President Vladimir Putin in In July 1999--just a few weeks before Moscow in January 2005, however, Russian- Vladimir Putin became President Boris Syrian relations have improved dramatically. Yeltsin's last prime minister, and just a few Russia has even agreed to sell an advanced months before he became president of Russia air defense missile system to Syria over both himself--Syria's longtime dictator, Hafiz American and Israeli objections. Russian- Assad, paid his last visit to Moscow. Izvestia Syrian cooperation deepened since then noted at the time that Syria still owed despite Damascus's increasing isolation over Moscow as much as $12 billion from Soviet its role in the assassination of Lebanese times and that "Russia virtually froze Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Logistics Capabilities for Expeditionary Operations
    China’s Logistics Capabilities for Expeditionary Operations The modular transfer system between a Type 054A frigate and a COSCO container ship during China’s first military-civil UNREP. Source: “重大突破！民船为海军水面舰艇实施干货补给 [Breakthrough! Civil Ships Implement Dry Cargo Supply for Naval Surface Ships],” Guancha, November 15, 2019 Primary author: Chad Peltier Supporting analysts: Tate Nurkin and Sean O’Connor Disclaimer: This research report was prepared at the request of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission to support its deliberations. Posting of the report to the Commission's website is intended to promote greater public understanding of the issues addressed by the Commission in its ongoing assessment of U.S.-China economic relations and their implications for U.S. security, as mandated by Public Law 106-398 and Public Law 113-291. However, it does not necessarily imply an endorsement by the Commission or any individual Commissioner of the views or conclusions expressed in this commissioned research report. 1 Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Methodology, Scope, and Study Limitations ........................................................................................................ 6 1. China’s Expeditionary Operations
    [Show full text]
  • Between Russia and Iran: Room to Pursue American Interests in Syria by John W
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 27 Between Russia and Iran: Room to Pursue American Interests in Syria by John W. Parker Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for the Study of Weapons of Mass Destruction. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: In the Gothic Hall of the Presidential Palace in Helsinki, Finland, President Donald Trump met with President Vladimir Putin on July 16, 2018, to start the U.S.-Russia summit. (President of Russia Web site/Kremlin.ru) Between Russia and Iran Between Russia and Iran: Room to Pursue American Interests in Syria By John W. Parker Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 27 Series Editor: Thomas F. Lynch III National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. January 2019 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia 2020 Human Rights Report
    RUSSIA 2020 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Russian Federation has a highly centralized, authoritarian political system dominated by President Vladimir Putin. The bicameral Federal Assembly consists of a directly elected lower house (State Duma) and an appointed upper house (Federation Council), both of which lack independence from the executive. The 2016 State Duma elections and the 2018 presidential election were marked by accusations of government interference and manipulation of the electoral process, including the exclusion of meaningful opposition candidates. On July 1, a national vote held on constitutional amendments did not meet internationally recognized electoral standards. The Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Security Service, the Investigative Committee, the Office of the Prosecutor General, and the National Guard are responsible for law enforcement. The Federal Security Service is responsible for state security, counterintelligence, and counterterrorism, as well as for fighting organized crime and corruption. The national police force, under the Ministry of Internal Affairs, is responsible for combating all crime. The National Guard assists the Federal Security Service’s Border Guard Service in securing borders, administers gun control, combats terrorism and organized crime, protects public order, and guards important state facilities. The National Guard also participates in armed defense of the country’s territory in coordination with Ministry of Defense forces. Except in rare cases, security forces generally report to civilian authorities. National-level civilian authorities have, at best, limited control over security forces in the Republic of Chechnya, which are accountable only to the head of Chechnya, Ramzan Kadyrov. Members of the Russian security forces committed numerous human rights abuses.
    [Show full text]
  • Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 25 Putin’s Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket by John W. Parker Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, and Center for Technology and National Security Policy. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the unified combatant commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier, August, 2012 (Russian Ministry of Defense) Putin's Syrian Gambit Putin's Syrian Gambit: Sharper Elbows, Bigger Footprint, Stickier Wicket By John W. Parker Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 25 Series Editor: Denise Natali National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. July 2017 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government. Cleared for public release; distribution unlimited. Portions of this work may be quoted or reprinted without permission, provided that a standard source credit line is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Belarusian Foreign Policy in the Middle East: a Neorealist Model of Relations Between Belarus and Iran
    37 The Journal of Belarusian Studies in the Middle East: A Neorealist Model of Relations between Belarus and Iran BY SIARHEI BOHDAN* Relations between Belarus and Iran have stirred up controversies concerning their alleged anti-American character. Yet, the Belarusian leadership has avoid- ed making serious anti-American gestures with Tehran doing its best to alleviate Western concerns in this regard. The chosen course of relations has demonstrat- cannot ignore the counteractions of their opponents, especially the United States, to this cooperation. With the emergence of a unipolar world, changes factors, such as the state’s own general capacities, have shaped this relationship considerably less. Both Belarusian and foreign media for nearly two past decades have regularly discussed Belarusian relations with Iran. The issue, however, remains almost entirely in the realm of the mass media and political polemics. Students of Belarusian foreign policy have so far failed to seriously analyse the countries links related to relations with Iran, pointing out the need to diversify Belarus’ foreign partners. Analysts and media critical of the government’s policy mostly argue that the Belarusian leadership follows a set of ideological preferences (left and/or anti-American) in dealing with developing countries in general and with Iran in particular. Arguing in this vein they essentially follow liberal theories of in- ternational relations. These prefer domestic factors (for example, the political regime of a country) in explaining the foreign policy behaviour of the govern- ment. * Siarhei Bohdan is a Senior Analyst with the Ostrogorski Centre and a PhD candidate at Freie Universität Berlin. Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/2021 10:45:44AM via free access Belarusian Foreign Policy in the Middle East 38 This article aims to propose a contrary, neorealist model to explain Belarus’ relationship with Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Adda Dcaq 28Jan21 E
    Daily Current Affairs Date: 28 JANUARY 2021 1. Name the Commanding Officer of 16 Bihar Regiment, 6. According to the International Monetary Fund's World who lost his life during the Galwan Valley clash last year, Economic Outlook, India’s economy is expected to bounce who was posthumously awarded with Maha Vir Chakra back strongly in the next fiscal year with how much recently? percentage of growth? (A) Colonel B Santosh Babu (A) 11.5% (B) Colonel Surinder Singh (B) 12.4% (C) Colonel Iqroop Singh Ghuman (C) 13.7% (D) Colonel Yogesh Kumar Joshi (D) 10.7% (E) Colonel Ranbir Singh (E) 09.5% 2. What is the name of the missile which was Successfully 7. The Board of Directors of Kerala-based Dhanlaxmi Bank tested by the Defense Research and Development have given approval to appoint whom as its managing Organization (DRDO) from the Integrated Test Range off director and CEO of the Bank? the coast of Odisha on 25 January 2021, which is a new (A) Sunil Gurbaxani generation Surface to Air Missile meant for use by Indian (B) Sajeev Krishnan Air Force with an aim of intercepting high maneuvering (C) CK Gopinathan low RCS aerial threats? (D) J K Shivan (A) Barak 8 (B) Ashwin BMI (E) G Rajagopalan Nair (C) Akash-NG (D) QRSAM (E) Pradyumna BMI 8. Who will going to take over as the next vice-chief of Army Staff, who is currently serving as the Southern Army 3. What is the name of the large-scale tri-service joint Commander and will be succeeding Lt General SK Saini? amphibious exercise recently held in the Andaman and (A) Lieutenant General Chandi Prasad Mohanty Nicobar Islands? (B) Lieutenant General Manoj Pande (A) AMPHEX-18 (C) Lieutenant General Raj Shukla (B) AMPHEX-22 (D) Lieutenant General Alok Singh Kler (C) AMPHEX-24 (E) Lieutenant General Yogesh Kumar Joshi (D) AMPHEX-28 (E) AMPHEX-21 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia: Continued Violations of the Right to Free
    RUSSIA: CONTINUED VIOLATIONS OF THE RIGHT TO FREE EXPRESSION July 2007 Freedom of expression is steadily deteriorating in the Russian Federation (Russia). Particularly alarming trends include the killing of journalists, and the absence of subsequent thorough and impartial investigations. Public officials, including at the highest level of the government, refuse to view the media as an independent critic and often regard it as a subordinate body aimed at furthering particular political goals. Media outlets who dare to voice independent opinions are silenced. The last year has also witnessed the suppression of opposition groups and peaceful demonstrations; the imposition of criminal sentences in freedom of expression cases; and attacks on minorities, whether religious, sexual or ethnic, thus further weakening Russia’s democratic credibility on the world stage. The instances described below constitute clear violations of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention of Human Rights, to which Russia is a party and which - in Article 19 and Article 10 respectively - guarantee the right to freedom of expression. The State parties to these conventions have an obligation to create an environment that encourages pluralism and political debate and to refrain from interfering in the work of the media. It is clear that such a pluralistic, open and diverse environment does not currently exist in Russia: while the media, journalists, opposition groups are silenced, the Russian public is deprived of its right to information and debate on matters of public importance. The following are just examples of the most serious instances. Death of journalists • Ivan Safronov, an investigative journalist for the Kommersant newspaper, died in mysterious circumstances on 2 March 2007, after falling from the window by the stairwell in his apartment block (one floor above his apartment).
    [Show full text]
  • The Improvement of the PLA's Close Air Support Capability
    The Improvement of the PLA’s Close Air Support Capability Derek Solen Introduction In August 2020 the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) indicated that some of its units had made technological and procedural advancements in its capability to provide close air support (CAS). The PLA has been working to develop the systems and procedures to conduct CAS safely and effectively for more than a decade. While these and other recent developments may indicate that the PLA has finally built the foundation of a complex of systems and procedures for safe and effective CAS, the PLA’s capability to conduct CAS is far from mature. The capability to provide CAS is indispensable for the PLA. CAS is one of two types of operations that the U.S. Air Force calls “counterland” operations, operations against an enemy’s land forces.1 CASi is defined as actions by aircraft, both fixed- and rotary-wing, against enemy land forces that are in close proximity to, and may have already engaged, friendly forces.2 The other type of counterland operation is air interdiction, which is an operation to “divert, disrupt, delay, or destroy” units of an enemy’s land forces before they engage friendly forces. 3 The primary distinction between these two types of operations is the proximity to friendly forces in which they are conducted. CAS is important for what the U.S. military calls “forcible entry” operations, operations to seize and hold lodgments, such as a beachhead or an airfield, through which additional troops and materiel can be transported to the battlefield.4 Forcible entry operations are generally conducted by highly mobile forces, such as amphibious and airborne forces, that cannot transport weapons like artillery and tanks.
    [Show full text]
  • Russia Nuclear Chronology
    Russia Nuclear Chronology 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 2002 | 2001-2000 | 1999 | 1998 | 1997-1993 Last update: July 2010 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation 2010 10 January 2010 UNIT OF VOLGODONSK POWER PLANT UNDERGOES EMERGENCY SHUTDOWN The first power unit of the Volgodonsk nuclear power plant in south Russia was shut down by an emergency protection system. Problems with a steam generator were the likely cause of the protection system activation. Rosenergoatom reported a normal level of background radiation at the plant. The Volgodonsk power plant began operating in 2001. It is situated some 1,000 km (621 miles) south of Moscow and has a single pressurized water reactor. —"Radiation Level Normal at Volgodonsk NPP After Emergency Shutdown," RIA Novosti, 1 January 2010, http://en.rian.ru; "Volgodonsk NPP Shuts Down First Power Unit in Emergency Mode," RIA Novosti, 1 January 2010, http://en.rian.ru.
    [Show full text]