<<

PROJECT Improvement of Central National Park Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern

Inception report for Lots 1,2,3 (Q2)

June 2018

Ev--CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

INDEX OF CONTENTS

ACRONYMS ...... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...... 2 DELIVERABLE 1: Ev-K2-CNR IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ...... 3 DELIVERABLE 2: INFORMATION ABOUT CKNP AND DNP INCLUDING ITS DEMOGRAPHICS, MAPS, TARGET COMMUNITY, VILLAGES, EXISTING LSO/ VCC AND AREAS REQUIRING COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION...... 15 DELIVERABLE 3: LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE LOCAL PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP (LPAG) ...... 43 DELIVERABLE 4: MINUTES OF THE 1ST MEETING OF THE LOCAL PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP ...... 44 DELIVERABLE 5: MOUs WITH RELEVANT GOVT. DEPARTMENTS SIGNED ...... 47 DELIVERABLE 6: CONSULTATION MEETINGS WITH COMMUNITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS IN CKNP AND DNP ...... 48 DELIVERABLE 7: SURVEY FOR TRAINING NEED ASSESSMENT ...... 50 DELIVERABLE 8: MINUTES OF THE INCEPTION WORKSHOP ...... 58 DELIVERABLE 9: PRELIMINARY SURVEY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF – CENTRAL KARAKORUM NATIONAL PARK ECOLOGICAL CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES ... 72 ANNEX I: SIGNED MOUs WITH CONCERNED AUTHORITIES ...... 77 ANNEX II: MINUTES OF THE 1ST CONSULTATION SESSION WITH PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS 87

Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

ACRONYMS

AKRSP - Aga Khan Rural Support Programme

CBO - Community Based Organization

CKNP- Central Karakorum National Park

DNP - Deosai National Park

ETI - Economic Transformation Initiative

GB -

GIS - Geographic Information System

GPS - Global Positioning System

IMARC - Integrated Mountain Areas Research Center

KIU- Karakoram International University

LPAG Local Project Advisory Group

LSO - Local Support Organization

M&E - Monitoring and Evaluation

MP -Management Plan

MPA - Mountain Protected Area

NRM - Natural Resource Management

OP - Operational Plan

PIDSA - Debt for Development Swap Agreement

SEED- Socio Economic and Environmental Development

SO - Social Organizer

SWOT - Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats

TNA - Training Need Assessment

ToR - Terms of Reference

UNDP - United Nations Development Programme

VCSDP - Valley Conservation and Sustainable Development Plan

VCC - Valley Conservation Committee

WO - Women Organization

WWF- World Wildlife Fund for Nature

1 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The inception report describe the main results achieved by Ev-K2-CNR in the second quarter of the Project.

Activity progress allow to present all the 9 foreseen deliverables and in particular: 1. Implementation strategy 2. Information about CKNP and DNP 3. List of members of the Local Project Advisory Group 4. Minutes of the 1st meeting of the Local Project Advisory Group 5. MoUs signed with relevant Govt. departments 6. Consultation meetings with communities and other stakeholders in CKNP and DNP 7. Survey for Training Need Assessment initiated 8. Minutes of the project inception workshop 9. Survey initiated for the identification of boundary of ecological corridor

During this first period of work, no particular criticisms have been highlighted and the activities follow the foreseen workplan. Project team, including local and international experts have been defined and a network of connections with concerned authorities, stakeholder and communities has been established.

This initial period allow to have a more clear picture on the information available for the two protected areas and to initiate a discussion about the ecological corridor possible locations. This starting point is a fundamental step to properly plan further field activities.

Since UNDP suggested to plan the first meeting of the Local Project Advisory Group on July 9, and in order to respect the deadline of June 30 for the delivery of the inception report, this document present the results of the preliminary interactions with LPAG, which allow to confirm group members and to prepare group ToRs which will be presented and approved during the first meeting. LPAG 1st meeting minutes will be thus included in the 3rd quarter progress report.

2 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 1: Ev-K2-CNR IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY

The full document has been officially delivered to UNDP on May 2018. Herewith below project rationale, activities and workplan are reported.

Project Rationale Why an update/review of CKNP and DNP Management and Operational Plans and Delineation of Ecological Corridor Needed? The circumstances and issues that are significant for a National Park may change over time because of emergence of new issues, ongoing projects’ interventions, new types of outdoor activities and climate change. Changes like these may require a new approach to management that may not fit in with the existing Plan of Management. In this situation it is suggested to review and revise the entire management and operational plan of national park through various studies and consultations in coordination with relevant departments. The operational plan divides CKNP in 15 valleys. In Ev-K2-CNR SEED phase II (2016) project, VCSDPs for each valley developed to promote participatory natural resource management and enrich environmental conservation of the park and to create synergies among park stakeholders and to promote community-based conservation in CKNP buffer zone valleys and villages. Given that VCSDPs are the main planning tools for the sustainable development for CKNP valleys and watersheds, its proposed management interventions should be reflected in Park’s MP and OP. It is important to review that other programs including ETI GB supported by IFAD comply with the content of VCSDP in terms of biodiversity and sustainable development in Protected Areas/Watersheds. This will be particularly important in case of development of infrastructures like irrigation channels, roads, introducing new crop cultivars and farming practices. Furthermore, it is important to focus also on the results of CKNP Management Plan Implementation PC-I phase II by GB Forest department through CKNP Directorate. Since the development and approval of the MP and OP it has been almost four years. These are lively documents which require a regular updating through surveys, research and stakeholder consultative sessions. The MP and OP of CKNP will be updated under lot 1 adopting participatory approaches. The draft management plan of DNP has been developed by WWF. However, the operational plan has yet to be developed translating the MP into actions to devise a strategy and for its implementation later on. The objective is to facilitate implementation of certain activities under the “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan”. Activities of the project will be implemented in Gilgit Baltistan, focusing specifically on CKNP and DNP. The activities include review and updating of CKNP and DNP Management and Operational Plans, mapping of an Ecological Corridor between CKNP and DNP, capacity building of relevant stakeholders, design of a web-platform for sharing best practices on biodiversity conservation and park management and others. The analysis of the DNP Management Plan (WWF, 2016) and related literature give a vision not different from the initial situation of the CKNP regarding the requirements for nature conservation and needs of the communities with interest in the Park area. The existing management plan of DNP will be revised and operational plan will be developed with the main objectives: 1. Re-establishment of the area’s inherent self-sustaining biophysical integrity 2. Definition of land use parameters 3. Long term conservation of natural fauna, flora, cultural, and scenic features of the area

3

Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

4. Promotion of sustainable use of the natural resources and historic cultural sites of the park for educational, recreational, and scientific purposes through appropriate regulation 5. Promotion of local, provincial, national, and international tourism development at recreational and geo-tourism levels 6. Promotion of the economic and social uplift and well-being of the park’s human population 7. Development of an integrated conservation and tourism environment within a regional rural social context In the 70s of the last century the concept of conservation biology was developed, and this new interdisciplinary approach starts to link together social sciences with the nature management (Soulè and Wilcox, 1980). From this new point of view it was clear that for the conservation of the biodiversity and natural resources on long term, the protected areas were not sufficient (Noss, 1991a). With the bio- approach (McNeely, 1992) the aim was to avoid habitat loss and territorial fragmentation, one of the most threats for the biodiversity (Wilcove et al., 1986; Noss, 1991b), through the creation and conservation of biological corridors: natural areas (natural or agricultural ecosystems) able to connect the different Protected Areas maintaining the necessary flow of individuals and genes between the populations (i.e. Soulé, 1987; Noss, 1993). The importance of this new approach is growing up during the time also considering the potential impact of climate change on ecosystem and species, especially the ones located in mountain areas that, for their specialized adaptation to the extreme conditions, are more sensitive to this phenomenon. The proposed connectivity corridor between CKNP and DNP can promote biological conservation because it may contribute to habitat connectivity for a range of individual species. Ev-K2-CNR will strive to identify and map the corridor as mentioned in ToRs through a range of proposed interventions under Lot 2. A research planning team ( internal group) comprising planning team and researchers will be established in inception phase, aiming to set objectives and priorities for the smooth and timely accomplishment of the project. Relevant information through secondary sources will be gathered in inception phase on natural, cultural and socio economic aspects including satellite maps. To fill the data gaps and for on ground accuracy, primary information will be collected both in inception and main phase through series of field surveys. Relevant data collected through secondary and primary sources will be analyzed to produce corridor thematic layers in main phase with the support of experts, GIS tools and computer modeling. In main phase SWOT analysis for the potential area will be carried out to have pros and cons of various zones and maps of maps of possible connecting areas. Based on the documents, consultations and research findings, connectivity corridor will be mapped and post project scenarios will be built.

Objective The main objective of the current assignment, in line with the objectives of the project is to improve the governance of mountain ecosystems in northern Pakistan, with regards to ecosystem services, nature conservation and the sustainable use of natural resources and promotion of effective response to climate change.

Specific Objectives Governance: Management of Central Karakoram National Park, Deosai National Pak and connectivity corridor between CKNP and DNP have been improved, which includes enhancing functional capacities of relevant CKNP, DNP, and Government Departments in the target area to undertake the desired activities related to park management. Knowledge: A mechanism to share knowledge, lessons, experiences and best practices in protected area management domestically and internationally has been established. 4 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Deliverables The deliverables under this assignment will include the following

Outputs Deliverables Actions Phase 1 Phase 2 1: Management of Central Karakorum National Park, Activity Result 1.0 : Key Action 1.0(a) Participation in the project and Deosai National Park Stakeholder Mobilized for Orientation workshop and connectivity corridor implementation and between CKNP and DNP ownership for projects Action 1.0 (b). 1.0(b) Conduct 3 Quarterly is improved, which includes intervention develops meetings of Local Project Advisory Group enhancing functional capacities of relevant Action1.1 ( a) Conduct 02 Consultative Action 1.1 (a). Review Progress made in Inception Phase and CKNP, DNP, Government Activity Result 1.1: meetings with communities/stakeholders identify short-comings. departments in the target CKNP Management Plan in CKNP. area to undertake the revised, updated and Action 1.1 (b). Quarterly meetings (04) of Local Project Advisory desired activities related to submitted for Action 1.1(b). Review background Group providing technical support and coordination park management. Government approval information documents, reports including available MP/OP of CKNP, DNP and Action 1.1 (c). Conduct 15 Consultative meetings with potential ecological corridor communities in CKNP region in coordination with WWF Action 1.1 (d). Cover gaps in national park management, priority Action 1.1 (c) Gap analysis of the areas and community interests in MP and OP of CKNP information and data between the MP/OP of CKNP and VCSDPs Action 1.1 (e). Conduct 02 field surveys for the assessment of flora, fauna and impact of implementation of the previous MP/OP Action 1.1 (d) Conduct 2 Consultative meetings with communities/stakeholders Action 1.1 (f). ) Finalize CKNP MP/OP and submit for in CKNP government of GB approval

Action 1.1(e) Develop, print and Action 1.1 (g). Conduct 03 training events for protected area disseminate 1 Project visibility material for managers and staff on park management , biodiversity CKNP conservation and monitoring

Action 1.1 (h). Conduct 02 trainings for the communities

Action 1.1 (i). Print visibility material for CKNP Activity Result 1.2: DNP Action 1.2 (a) Conduct 3 Consultative meetings Action 1.2 (a). Carry out 02 questionnaire based field Management and with communities/stakeholders in DNP surveys and data analysis for customary practices Operational plans revised, Action 1.2 (b) Review of customary laws updated and submitted governing natural resources for Government approval Action 1.2(c). Delineation of DNP Boundary with Action 1.2 (b). Collect Primary data through field surveys

5 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Outputs Deliverables Actions Phase 1 Phase 2 the GPS and remote sensing (preliminary work for floral assessment done) Action 1.2(d) Work out DNP Zoning system and Action 1.2 (c). Collect Primary data through field surveys develop initial concept for fauna assessment Action (e). Develop, print and disseminate Project visibility material for DNP Action 1.2 (d). Record GPS coordinates from all sides of DNP for boundary delineation

Action 1.2 (e). Conduct 04 Meetings with the communities along the boundary of DNP on the park boundary delineation

Action 1.2 (f). Develop GIS based maps for DNP various zones including core zone, minimal use zone, buffer zone etc .

Action 1.2 (g). Finalize zones including Core Zone, Minimal Use Zone, Sustainable Use Zone, Intensive Use Zone and Buffer Zone with GIS techniques, ground verification and community support

Action 1.2 (h). Conduct 1 stakeholders’ meeting for zoning system

Action 1.2 (i). Update Management Plan of DNP and update first draft with all collected information

Action 1.2 (j). Finalize first draft of Operational Plan for DNP will be finalized

Action 1.2 (k). Conduct 1 consultative session with stakeholders to share newly updated OP and MP for DNP

Action 1.2 (l). Print Project visibility material, OP and MP for DNP

Action 1.2 (m). Submit the updated MP and OP of DNP for approval

6 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Outputs Deliverables Actions Phase 1 Phase 2 Activity Result 1.3: Action 1.3 (a). Conduct 02 meetings with Action 1.3 (a) Conduct 2 field surveys for floral and faunal Ecological corridor the communities along the corridor , one assessment and analyse primary data of ecological corridor between CKNP and each in CKNP and DNP DNP identified and mapped Action 1.3 (b). Carryout one field survey Action 1.3 (b). Conduct 05 meetings with the communities along of the potential sites for establishing the corridor corridor for primary data and to have a clear picture of the actual situation. Action 1.3 (c). Develop maps of ecological corridor through field surveys Action 1.3 (c). Identify possible ecological boundary points with GIS and develop Action 1.3 (d). Develop final document of ecological corridor initial concept with identified site, maps and boundary delineation

Action 1.3 (c). Develop, print and Action 1.3 (e). Conduct 2 consultative sessions with key disseminate project visibility material for stakeholders ecological corridor Action 1.3(f). Develop management guidelines for the ecological corridor developed on the basis of field surveys, consultative sessions and available literature.

Action 1.3 (h). Printing of the publications 2: A mechanism to share Activity Result 2.2: Action 2.2 (a). Conduct Training Need 2.2 (a). Printing of TNA, capacity building plan, training manual knowledge, lessons, Training Needs Assessment (TNA) through and visibility material will be printed experience, and best Assessment (TNA) questionnaires and meetings with the practices in protected area carried out and Capacity stakeholders (Directorates of DNP and management domestically Building Plan developed CKNP, CBOs, etc) for the identification and internationally has and implemented of the areas of capacity building been established. Action 2.2 (b) Develop a comprehensive capacity building plan for protected areas staff in GB on the basis of TNA results

7 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Outputs Deliverables Actions Phase 1 Phase 2 Activity Result 2.4: 2.4 (a). ) Development of purpose, goals 2.4 (a). Share for approval with UNDP the specifications and Web-platform on and specifications and feature summary design of the web platform protected areas designed document of web platform. and rolled out 2.4 (b). Finalize web platform in agreement with UNDP and stakeholders feedback, development will be finalized

2.4 (c). ) Hold 03 radio talks of experts on conservation issues in mountain areas

8 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Proposed activities description

Output 1: Management of Central Karakoram National Park and Connectivity Corridor between CKNP and DNP is improved which includes enhancing functional capacities of relevant CKNP and DNP, Government departments and Project staff in the target area to undertake the desired activities related to Park management.

Major Deliverables: 1.1. CKNP management plan revised, updated and submitted for Government approval 1.2. DNP management and operational plans revised, updated and submitted for government approval 1.3. Ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP identified and mapped Activity Result 1.1: CKNP Management Plan revised, updated and submitted for Government and UNDP, at the inception, will conduct one orientation workshop in Gilgit Baltistan. Project staff of Ev-K2-CNR, representatives from UNDP, WWF-P, Government of GB (including line agencies), parks staff, and media and community representatives will be provided with detailed orientation about the Improvement of CKNP Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan Project and its relevant assignments. Participants will be briefed in details about project’s objectives, procedures, activities, project area, proposed target beneficiaries, project duration and project monitoring etc. A Local Project Advisory Group will be established in coordination with UNDP and WWF. The Local Project Advisory Group will provide its technical inputs. Proposed initiatives will be shared with community living in 15 valleys of CKNP and their needs and issues will be identified through participatory approach in consultative sessions. Communities will be selected in coordination with partner organization WWF-P on the basis of park boundaries, recognized rights of communities with in the park and their needs and issues will be identified through participatory approach in consultative sessions. Available data for CKNP, DNP and potential ecological corridor (information from stakeholders, scientific and “gray” literature, technical documents, previous Management Plans) will be collected and analyzed, in order to assess the data reliability of the biological and physical resources and condition of the area, historical and cultural heritages, human activities, also considering traditional natural resources use, recreational aspects and tourism, political, administrative and customary laws and rules, administration, with focus on operational, manpower and financial resources required to run the DNP, CKNP and Ecological Corridor. On the basis of these results, a review and gap analysis will be carried out, identifying if and what further data have to be collected. The information requirements and the indications for the structuring of research activities will be shared with research institutions, government representatives, park staff and stakeholders. The review of literature is required for all major deliverables in devising updated CKNP and DNP management and operational plans and ecological corridor identification and mapping, hence it will be done under one single activity 1.1 (e).

Activity Result 1.2: DNP Management and Operational plans revised, updated and submitted for Government approval The revision of management plan and development of operational plan for DNP will entail rigorous efforts as it will be a new product out of revised management plan. Ev-K2-CNR project team will carry out social mobilization and consultative sessions with community of DNP in coordination with partner NGO, in order to fulfil learning needs of the community and to ensure sustainability of proposed

9 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

interventions in a cooperative, efficient and transparent manner. The approach to delineate park boundaries is very complex and needs a relevant amount of data from different environmental, economic, political, administrative, legal and social sectors. DNP boundaries’ delineation at inception phase will involve initial GIS work; obtaining thematic maps and community meetings. Initial concept of zoning system will be worked out with various zones in DNP including Core zone, Minimal Use Zone, Sustainable Use Zone, Intensive Use Zone. More detailed work on park zonation and boundary delineation will be carried out in main phase.

Activity Result 1.3: Ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP identified and mapped a. 02 meetings with the communities along the corridor , one each in CKNP and DNP b. Carryout one field survey of the potential sites for establishing corridor for primary data and to have a clear picture. c. Possible ecological boundary points identified with GIS and very initial concept writing d. Visibility material for ecological corridor developed for printing Specific field surveys , GPS coordinates and meetings with local groups/ communities in line with selection criteria and in coordination with WWF for different inland zones of Ecological Corridor will be held in order to fill the gaps emerged from the documents review and needs and perspectives of local communities, and analyse field situation with practical perspective for establishing ecological corridor

Output 2: A mechanism to share knowledge, lessons, experience, and best practices in protected area management domestically and internationally has been established. Major Deliverables: Activity Result 2.2: Training Needs Assessment (TNA) carried out and Capacity Building Plan developed and implemented TNA will determine if a training need exists and, if it does, what training is required to fill the gap. TNA seeks to identify accurately the levels of the present situation in the target surveys, interview, observation, secondary data and/or workshop. The gap between the present status and desired status may indicate problems that in turn can be translated into a training need.

Training Needs = Desired Capability – Current Capability of the concerned categories

Based on the TNA, a capacity and development plan will be developed and implemented. The capacity building plan will include the priority topics, on which trainings for GB park managers, parks staff and community will be conducted. TNA and capacity building plan will be carried out in inception phase and it will be implemented in main phase. The numbers of trainings given in deliverables and activities table are subject to amendment as the number of trainings and topics will be generated from capacity building plan.

Activity Result 2.4: Web-platform on protected areas designed and rolled out In Pakistan there is still a lack of centralized data repository to facilitate the sharing and the archiving of the information. While establishing a collaborative network between MPAs managers, a common web tool will not only facilitate the sharing of information and the interactions among Pakistan MPAs managers and Institutions, but also for general public interested in assessing MPAs information which is one of the issues highlighted under this project. The proposed platform for web services will be based on the architecture of Geonetwork Open Source for the metadata acquisition and storing on a database. Development and finalization of web platform will be a continuous process; in inception

10 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

phase the purpose, goals and objectives of web platform will be developed with detailed specification of the web platform; it will be finalized in main phase. It will be an integrated web-portal serving all the national parks of GB in particular and protected area managers and communities of the country in general. In inception phase specifications and features of the web-portal will developed in inception phase but it will be finalized in inception phase.

Proposed methodology and approach Partnership strategy The partnership strategy is intended to figure out the potential partners and devising a mechanism to collaborate for the effective implementation of the project. Multiple partners will have a significant role in entire process project implementation. EvK2CNR will leverage on its strong relations with the community organizations, government institutions and other partners while working in the CKNP and DNP. Overall following strategy will be adopted in reaching out partners and to work with them.

Community involvement strategy The revision of the MP/OP of CKNP and development of OP of DNP will require undergoing a rigorous community involvement plan. Communities around CKNP and DNP will be met to obtain the necessary information and also to mobilize them for their necessary involvement. The communities will have the major role as having their rights inside and around the park. A protected area is governed under the customary and statuary laws which have a direct link with the communities. However, mobilization has a pivotal role in creating among them ownership for a national park. Ev-K2-CNR while developing the MP/OP of the CKNP has created close linkages with the communities also giving them the incentives with livelihood interventions during the past many years. Based on such strong relations, the communities will be contacted again while conducting with them the consultative sessions and workshops for the revision of MP and OP of CKNP and to develop the operational plan for DNP. Since the activities under Lot 4 compliment the activities under Lots 1,2 and 3, the EvK2CNR will liaise closely with WWF for selection of communities for consultation and the mobilization process. i. CKNP: CKNP encompasses an area of 10000 km2 in five districts of GB including Gilgit, , , and Ghanche. There are 15 valleys with the approximate 125.000 people in 220 villages. The communities have use rights in the national parks. However, after the boundary delineation and completion of zoning system in the SEED project, the communities have been sensitized about their rights and restrictions in view of the rules in a protected area. Building upon such initiatives, communities will be involved through existing CBOs to ensure compliance with the laws to protect the parks. CBOs in fifteen valleys of CKNP will be reviewed to know their functional status. Offices of Ev-K2-CNR in Gilgit and Skardu will update the list of LSOs, WOs, VCCS and other CBOs clearly indicating their functioning status. Active CBOs from each valley will be highlighted. Subsequently, for any intended meeting with the communities, the President and General Secretary of the CBO will be contacted. In order to reach the communities, support from these organizations will also be sought wherever needed in coordination of with other partner NGO. ii. DNP DNP is spread over approximately 3626 km2 with 8 valleys around the park. The population is almost 12584 with 1321 households. Balti and Shina are the major languages spoken around the park. A

11 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

vigorous community mobilization will lead to creating maximum awareness among the communities on the rules inside the protected areas and their role in the entire management system. The consultative sessions and meetings with the communities/representatives will be led as part of the revision of the DNP MP and to develop its new OP. Compare to CKNP, the communities in DNP are not very much mobilized. There have been very less interventions on park management practices or on the livelihood improvement of its communities. Taking into account the ground realities, CBOs will be assessed finding out their status. Meeting and sessions will be held with the communities as per plan in every valley of the protected area. Moreover, CBOs that are found dormant and inactive necessary support will be provided for revival and functioning together with other implementing NGO. Subsequently meetings and consultative sessions will be held on need basis which will vary both in the inception phase and the main phase.

II. Government institutions: Close coordination will be established with the Department of Forest Wildlife and Environment, Tourism Department, Agriculture and Livestock Department, Planning and Development Department. At the commencement of the project, meetings will be held with government forest, wildlife and environment department for an orientation of the project and also seeking necessary support in implementation and approvals. A meeting with government planning department GB will also be conducted to give an orientation on the project. Meetings with directorates of CKNP and DNP will also be organized at the inception however; a constant coordination with both directorates will be continuing by end of the project. Moreover, to seek cooperation from the local administration a meeting with the local administration in Gilgit and Skardu will be held. Ev-K2-CNR has the MOU signed with government forest, wildlife and parks department. Under its umbrella, the secretariat will be requested to direct its directorates to extend support in the implementation of the activities under this project. Furthermore, possibilities will be worked out for partnership with KIU for the research studies. Ev-K2- CNR supported to establish IMARC (Integrated Mountain Areas Research Center) established under SEED at KIU. The purpose of its establishment has been to setup a center focusing on research in the mountain areas.

2.2. Communications strategy The communication strategy for Lot 1 will primarily be linked with the output of Lot 3 i.e Web Platform Development. All the information related to the project and parks will be put on to the web- portal for maximum visibility of both parks. Furthermore, in order to reach to the desired results consultative meeting will be held with the relevant target groups in the process to update the management plan of CKNP. Similarly an inclusive approach will be adopted in reviewing the management plan of DNP. Workshops and other participatory sessions can be conducted to obtain information and knowledge from the communities. Moreover, meetings and sessions will be organized with the government organizations and other stakeholders as given in the partnership strategy. Information about interventions on the mountain communities and protected areas do not generally reach the masses and main stream media. It thus requires highlighting the achievements through a proper strategy among media, communities, government institutions, and donor. EvK2CNR cherishes on its wide relations with partner organizations, close relations with the communities, and strong ties with the media over last many years in Gilgit-Baltistan as well as at national and international levels. Thus a robust communication strategy will aim at disseminating and getting across the information on achievements among the stakeholders.

12 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

In addition the communication strategy will seek to disseminate the visibility material among a wider audience. EvK2CNR has previously developed the website for CKNP that will also be linked with the newly developed web platform for the dissemination of the information among the target groups. Different tools will be in place for the visibility of the project including electronic and print media. EvK2CNR, through its robust communication strategy will establish close linkages. Communities will be met on a regular basis as part of the social mobilization, obtaining the indigenous knowledge and to find out ways to work in a collaborative manner. The communication guidelines of the UNDP will be taken into account in the implementation of the communication strategy. Any material for mass communication, interviews to media sources or sending messages through social media will be done after approval from UNDP.

Objectives 8. To disseminate the information and visibility about the project achievements to multiple stakeholders and general public at large. 9. To create strong links with government institutions, organizations, communities and media 10. To take best out of the project initiatives with synergies and collaborations with the interventions from other organizations through proper communication including one meeting in every quarter. 11. Sensitizations and awareness on the key environmental issues and related responsibilities among the relevant stakeholders 12. Liaise and coordinate with donor and implementing NGO 13. To give visibility to the project interventions

Proposed activities; 14. Development of an integrated web platform with information, and visibility of CKNP, DNP and other protected areas of GB. 15. Development and dissemination of visibility material including leaflets, brochures. 16. Development and sharing of revised MP/OP of CKNP and DNP with stakeholders 17. Carryout meeting with stakeholders from time to time to closely liaise on the crosscutting thematic areas. 18. Talks on radio will be organized on environment and livelihood related matters considering the local context and needs. 19. Relevant international days will be celebrated to exploit on the themes with communities, students, and other agencies giving awareness and related information. 20. Frequent meeting will be held with the government departments for necessary support in the project intervention areas and also to share about the results of the project. 21. Development of brochures and leaflets

Target Groups 22. Community 23. Government institutions 24. Media houses 25. Stakeholders 26. Park managers and communities of other protected areas of the country

13 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Channels and tools Electronic and Print Media Electronic and print media will be used for conveying the messages at grassroots level. , PTV, Karakoram Publishing Network, and other local and national broadcasting channels will be used for the necessary communication. Social Media Social media including, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram will have an important role in getting messages across among a wider audience. Website The website of EvK2CNR, Central Karakoram National Park and newly to-be-developed web platform under the lot 3 will be used for the knowledge and information sharing. The websites will be enriched with adequate information, pictures and other material linking it with other relevant and useful websites. Face-to-face meetings Face-to-face meetings are pertinent as part of mobilization and also for the information and knowledge sharing. Among the communities of CKNP and DNP, the meeting will be held at different forums including communication organizations about the park management related issues and their role. Also the awareness sessions will be held on the ecological sensitivities. Reports and Formal documentation Reflecting the project activities reports and other documents will be shared with UNDP, partners and government institutions keeping in view the relevance.

14 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 2: INFORMATION ABOUT CKNP AND DNP INCLUDING ITS DEMOGRAPHICS, MAPS, TARGET COMMUNITY, VILLAGES, EXISTING LSO/ VCC AND AREAS REQUIRING COMMUNITY MOBILIZATION.

This section provides a general overview of the Central Karakorum National Park and the Deosai National Park. While there is a very comprehensive knowledge of CKNP thanks to the data collection done in the previous projects carried out in the area such as Karakorum Trust II and SEED Project phase I and II, the availability of information about DNP could be improved also to support the development of a specific Operational Plan that is lacking for this Protected area. Moreover, to so it is necessary to put together, information as well as to program field missions to improve the knowledge about this Park and to improve the available management documents.

THE CENTRAL KARAKORUM NATIONAL PARK 1. Introduction/Background The Central Karakorum National Park (CKNP), better identifiable as the Park of K2, is located in the Gilgit Baltistan, Pakistan by bordering with China and India. Central Karakorum in the Northern Area of Pakistan is a mountain area endowed with rich biodiversity, superb natural beauty and important resources. It was declared the Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) in 1993. Today it is Pakistan’s largest protected area, covering 10,557.73 km2 in the Central Karakorum mountain range, which includes K2, the second highest peak in the world. It occupies four administrative districts of the Gilgit-Baltistan Region. Pakistan Central Karakoram has not only the highest number of high mountain peaks in the world, but also the highest concentration of forests, pastures, biodiversity, medical plants and protected areas of the entire country. Therefore the Government of Pakistan notified the Central Karakorum National Park (CKNP) in December 1993, in order to protect and develop its huge potential.

1.2. The highest Park all over the world The CKNP encompasses the densest collection of the highest mountain peaks in the world. It includes four, out of the total fourteen, over-8,000-meter-high peaks on Earth − K2, 8611 m, II, 8035 m, , 8080 m, , 8051 m − more than sixty peaks higher than 7,000 metres and more than 700 peaks above 6000 meters .The CKNP area is also the most heavily glaciated part of the world outside the polar . The , a 67 km-long glacier, meets the 49 km-long Glacier to create the world’s longest glacial system outside the polar regions. The , 63 km in length, is also one of the longest glaciers in the world.

2. Localization and access The Central Karakorum National Park (CKNP), officially gazetted as national park in 1993, is the largest protected area of Pakistan, covering over 10,000 km2. It falls into four administrative districts of Gilgit-Baltistan Region.

The Gilgit Baltistan Region covers about 72,500 km2 in the north of Pakistan and it borders with China, Afghanistan and India. Its position represents one section of the Asian high-mountain system of Hindukush- Karakorum-West Himalaya (HKKH).

15 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

For centuries, the Gilgit Baltistan was one of the most remote and inaccessible region of the sub- but, since 1965, roads to the southern lowlands of Pakistan connected the GB on a year- round basis. Then, the realization of the Karakorum Highway (completed in 1978) opened up the Gilgit Baltistan to a series of unprecedented changes (social, economic, cultural and environmental). The Karakorum Highway (KKH), linking Pakistan and China, crosses through the GB for about 840 km and provides them with a vital link to the rest of Pakistan. The road has also spawned a network of “jeepable” roads throughout the Region. The region now has hundreds of kilometres of roads, over 360 bridges and two substantial airports

Climate The Central Karakorum National Park’s area is part of the "transitional zone" between the arid Central and the semi-humid subtropics of the . Local climate is characterized by greater precipitation in winter and spring and by the effects of arid continental climate in summer with sudden onsets of cold weather in early autumn. As a general rule, a decreasing humidity and an increasing significance of continental climate elements can be observed from south to north. The amount of precipitation increases with altitude, an essential precondition for the expanded glaciation of mountain peaks. At high altitudes generally, it occurs to have more snowfalls than rainfalls. Down the valleys, aridity prevails with an average annual precipitation of less than 300 mm . Average rainfall in the valleys is 100-300 mm most of which occurs during winter and early spring. Significant research on glaciers, water and snow melt has been carried out in the CKNP under Ev-K2- CNR/SEED project. CKNP is home to hundreds of peaks higher than 6000 m above sea level (a.s.l.), with wide mountain glaciers. This mountain range is being extensively investigated due to the so-called “Karakorum anomaly”, i.e. a general stability of many central Karakorum glaciers versus the general shrinking of eastern Himalayan and Tibetan glaciers. Despite this, changes in the “average” climate of the Pakistan northern areas, the region where the Karakorum is located, have been observed over the last century by the Pakistan Meteorological Department by analysing surface meteorological data. Moreover, studies carried out in the Upper Indus Basin have reported increasing winter precipitation/decreasing summer temperature over the last two-three decades. Together with the possible transport of short-lived climate forcers (like black carbon and surface ozone) up to the higher mountain, the observed change of meteorological regimes can impact both the mountain cryosphere and the hydrological system, with severe implications to the society and agriculture of the whole country: Karakorum hosts the Upper Indus Basin (UIB), which is one of the main catchment basins which supply irrigation water for Pakistan.

3. Ecological Zoning The great altitudinal range and the climatic conditions (considering, in particular, low precipitation and the effects of westerly humid winds) have carved out distinctive ecological zones, which have been identified on the basis of researches on vegetation and on the rich faunal component associated to each zone . The major ecological zones represented in CKNP are; - Alpine Dry Steppe (Artemisia-Steppe) - Sub-alpine Scrub Zone - Alpine Meadows and Alpine Scrub Zone Permanent Snowfields and Cold Deserts (Sub-Nival and Nival Zones)

16 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

4. Land Cover The land cover map of the area indicates that a major part (66.5%) is covered by snow and glaciers. Bare rocks and bare soils also represent a substantial part (15.4%) of CKNP, whereas vegetation base classes represents about more than 14.7% of the area. Vegetation classes considered for the area are the followings: - Scattered vegetation - Sparse vegetation - Pasture and/or Meadows < 3,750 m a.s.l. - Pasture and/or Meadows > 3,750 m a.s.l. - Open forest - Closed forest - Cultivated areas

5. Fauna Mammals CKNP is a refuge area not only for threatened species, i.e. , musk deer, urial and , but also for not threatened but important “flag” species, i.e. blue , ibex, lynx and . The CKNP was proposed in the early 90s of the 20th century to protect the major mountain massifs, watersheds and glaciers of the Central Karakorum region and to constitute a contiguous conservation area with the and the Deosai National Park. In CKNP area, brown bears are reported in low densities from Shigar, Baraldu and Baltoro Glacier, as well as from Nagir, Chaprote and Bar Nullah. Brown bears in the Baltoro valley subsisted mostly on grass and various roots.

17 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

CKNP Spring Wildlife Survey, 2018

Markhor

CKNP Spring Wildlife Survey, 2018

Ladakh Urial

CKNP Spring Wildlife Survey, 2018

18 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Summary of large mammals’ observations

CKNP Spring Wildlife Survey, 2018

Birds Around 90 species of birds are known to occur in the CKNP in 13 families. Their occurrence status varies from resident to breeder to migratory. Common snow cock, Chukar, rock pigeon, snow pigeon, oriental turtle dove, booted eagle, and common kestrel are among the common resident birds of the area. Common hoopoe, common cuckoo, common swift and Eurasian nightjar represent summer breeding birds of the area. Hen harrier, Eurasian skylark, Spanish sparrow, Himalayan accentor, Eurasian goldfinch, and pine bunting are winter visitors to the area. Rare birds of the CKNP include snow partridge, Himalayan Monal, golden eagle, alpine accentor, mountain finch, and Hume’s Wheatear. The key threats to avifauna are habitat destruction, degradation, and change in land use, pesticides use and hunting.

CKNP Spring Wildlife Survey, 2018

6. Flora The vegetation of Central Karakorum National Park covers 14.7% of the park area. High altitudes, low temperatures, and rough topography restrict the area suitable for plant growth. In particular, temperature is a limiting factor at higher elevations (above 4500 m), while insufficient water availability during the growing season is impeding plant growth at lower altitudes (below 2000 m, where natural

19 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

vegetation is mainly found around water bodies, like streams or lakes). Different vegetation types grow in the CKNP and they are of major importance both for ecological reasons (e.g. as habitat for wildlife, biodiversity conservation) and the sustainment of local communities (e.g. for the provision of grazing ground, firewood, timber). Additionally, environmental services, like protection from soil erosion, regulation of water quantity and quality, nutrient recycling are provided. Also if the most part of this ecosystem is outside of the Park’s boundaries, the forest ecosystem could be classified in five main zones: - Montane sub tropical scrubs: located along the main - Montane dry temperate coniferous, that could be pure or mixed with Montane dry temperate broad-leaved - Sub alpine - Northern dry scrubs Overall, the South-Western sector is characterized by a forest composition and structure which is richer both in area, biomass and species. Most of the largest forests of CKNP are located in the Southern lateral valleys of the main valley (with few exceptions on the southern border of CKNP along Indus River). Good examples of those rich forest ecosystems can be found in Haramosh, Khaltaro, Bagrote, Jaglot Gor and Astak valleys among others. On the contrary, in the North-Eastern valleys, mainly plant adapted to cold and xeric environment can be found. Forest cover is more fragmented and sparse with lower densities, stand biomass and increments. Forests areas here are therefore more scattered.

7. CKNP Glaciers According to CKNP Glacier Inventory (2016); CKNP is one of the most glaciated region on earth hosts 608 ice bodies (glaciers) of various types, sizes, surface conditions (debris occurrence), geometry and ice volume in five basins. The widest basin (for number of ice bodies, glacier extent and ice volume) is the Shigar basin, where the largest glaciers are present (among which Baltoro Glacier), and the smallest one is the Gilgit basin. Finally, the highest numbers of debris-covered glaciers are found in the Shyok basin (62 glaciers). Comparing glacier areas in 2001 and 2010, the Hunza glacierized area is characterized by the maximum shrinkage albeit not particularly intense (i.e. -0.76 km2), and the Upper Indus by the maximum increase (i.e. +0.52 km2). Generally, the glaciers found to be affected by higher variations belong to the 10-20 km2 size class. However, the analysis of area during 2001–2010 reveals a general stability, evidence of the anomalous behavior of glaciers in the Karakorum in contrast to the worldwide shrinkage of mountain glaciers; the Karakorum Anomaly was analyzed in view of the ongoing climate change. A slight increase in late summer average snow covered area during 2001–2010 was observed from MODIS snow data. At the same time, the available weather stations revealed an

20 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

increase of snowfall events and a decrease of mean summer air temperatures since 1980, which would translate into more persistent snow cover during the melt season. These results support enhanced glacier preservation in the ablation areas due to a long-lasting snow cover, and stronger accumulation at higher altitudes, pushing towards positive net balances. Nevertheless, linking these observations to the analysis of glacier area changes is not unambiguous, since there is a delay in the glacier area response to climate change depending on glacier size, with usually longer response times (even several decades) for larger glaciers.

8. Management Planning of CKNP Ev-K2-CNR through Karakorum Trust II (2006-2009), SEED Project (2009-2015), finalizes the process made on the Management Planning for CKNP, which was finally approved by the Wildlife Management Board of Gilgit Baltistan in 2014. The approval of the Management Plan - and its Operational Plan - represents for the Project and the Province a tremendous achievement. In fact, since the establishment of the CKNP in 1993, many attempts were made to prepare and adopt these documents, without succeeding. The MP, along with the OP, is an evidence-based, scientific document that, among others, sets a participatory governance framework providing the much-needed platform to engage local communities in the sustainable management of natural resources. Its main objective is to improve the quality of life of local communities and the conservation of the environment, the architectural and cultural heritage, and enhance the capacity of local communities and institutions to adapt to climate change. It may also be clarified that while the MP provides information about “what is inside the park” in term of knowledge (scientific baselines, research, mapping, etc) the OP gives the strategic and practical guidelines for the management of the CKNP and its natural resources. The preparation of the MP and OP was done through an intensive collaboration between the Project and KIU, focused to primarily collect the baseline data and general knowledge through joint research activities and field campaigns. To this end all the information gathered in previous projects that attempted to formulate the MP, as previously mentioned, were utilized for the preparation of the MP. The definition of the CKNP Management Plan started from a paramount concept: the design of a management plan not strictly “closed” which has given the possibility of further improvements, revisions and updates. Each design phase has been defined by specific documents and each plan revision has been based on the feedbacks received through a participative approach, which saw directly involved the local communities, the institutional and governmental bodies and the stakeholders.

9. Implementation of CKNP boundaries The complete review of CKNP boundaries was a very complex approach considering different set of data related to different sectors as environmental, economic, political, administrative, legal and social. Following step by step approach was used to implement the CKNP boundaries. a. The starting point was the boundaries on the map enclosed in the Government Notification of the Park b. Identification of private land and use right for resources in the Park, tough field survey and interview, and their transfer on map using a GIS system c. Identification of resource use and areas where they occur, considering the not sustainable ones like mining. d. Drafting of the preliminary boundaries

21 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

e. Consultation process with the local affected communities, government departments and stakeholders was carried out to re-evaluate and adjust the assessment of CKNP boundaries and hence to obtaining the acceptance of park by the local communities.

9.1. Park zones In order to facilitate the maintenance of the Central Karakorum National Park’s ecological integrity, while providing sustainable management opportunities for local communities and visitors, a zoning system has been implemented. This consists of two main zones: Buffer Zone and the Core Zone, covering a total of 10,557.73 km²:

CORE ZONE (7,606.83 km2): (7,606.83 km2) It aims to preserve a unique ecosystem, representative of the CKNP Area. A higher degree of conservation must be ensured. Within the Core Zone the following zones are included: a. Strictly Conservation Zone (SCZ); These portions of the Core Zone, are established to ensure the highest level of conservation of the ecosystems and/or threatened species of flora and fauna representative of the Park’s area. Therefore, neither human presence nor any kind of activities are allowed inside it, including trekking and climbing. SCZs were individuated on the basis of the presence of endangered large mammals, such as musk deer, urial, snow leopard, , or ibex. These species have been chosen both for their role as “umbrella species”, and for their need to live in large and well conserved territories. Moreover, they are able to preserve other species and ecosystems of the area. b. Touristic Trails. A net of trails (High Frequency Tourism Treks, Discovery Treks, Occasional Trek, Cultural Treks) each represented by a corridor of about 250 meters on both trail’s sides, starting from the Buffer Zone and continuing for the majority of their length inside the Core Zone, attracting mountaineers and trekkers at worldwide level. The detailed list of treks with indication of their uses and services is attached to this

22 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

document. This net is developed with a sustainable approach considering the quality and type of services provided during treks, and it includes different trails as below described.

BUFFER ZONE (2,950.9 km2) A zone within the Park’s boundaries, where the existing community use rights are permitted and deve- loped in a sustainable way, to assure nature conservation and the possibility of its long-term use by the local communities. The Buffer Zone contains two other sub-areas: the Conservation Areas (CA) and the Community Controlled Hunting Area (CCHA): Conservation Areas (CA) These areas are located inside the Buffer Zone and are focused on the conservation of the endangered species (e.g. Musk deer, Markhor, Brown bear, Snow leopard, Lynx...), and/or of particular vegetation and flora, and/or vulnerable ecosystems. In these areas, the presence of endangered and threatened species and ecosystems is leading to specific protection and conservation actions. Therefore, foreign, national and SAARC tourists/visitors should request a prior permission to the CKNP Directorate before entering these areas. Community Controlled Hunting Areas (CCHA) As for the Conservation Areas (CA), the Community Controlled Hunting Areas (CCHA) are characterized by a considerable presence of wildlife (in particular ungulates). As per IUCN Red List, most of them, like Markhor, are threatened or endangered and thus under protection by national and international agreements. The difference is that in these areas a Trophy Hunting Program was established on ungulates populations reaching specific standards, as effective measure for the conservation of the whole wildlife. Actually the CCHAs are notified by the Wildlife Department of Gilgit Baltistan if, after four consecutive seasonal wildlife surveys, the number of target species is considered viable. The survey request for its activation can be promoted by the local community of the area or by any organization. It is also mandatory that there should be a community organization established, so that the funds can be delivered to it, if the trophy hunting takes place. In case of CCHAs in/around CKNP Buffer Zone, the role of CKNP in assessing wildlife population should be considered. The 80% of the incomes generated by the selling of a hunting licence fee for the harvesting of a trophy male goes to the local communities, and these have to use 30% of this fund for nature conservation programs in the area. To ensure that this harvesting does not affect the target population, a specific monitoring program, based on scientific research, is carried out periodically within these Areas. Actually there are 6/7 Community Controlled Hunting Areas in the following places inside the CKNP Buffer Zone including , Kande, Haramosh and Skindarabad.

10. Socio economic condition of CKNP communities The mainstay of livelihoods in the research area, as in the other parts of Gilgit Baltistan is combined mountain agriculture: it is the complex integration of animal husbandry, agricultural and horticultural productive and reproductive activities across vertical landscapes with different productive potentials in temporal sequence within a yearly cycle.

23 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Basic facilities Generally, all the Union Councils have access to basic facilities as roads, electricity, telephone (except in Basha, Braldo and Dassu UCs), primary education, and health services. However, some of the remoter villages and hamlets within these Union Councils are still deprived of these basic necessities, moreover the health ones. The non-availability of basic health and education services takes a toll particularly on women who suffer the most due to the local culture and traditions that restrict their mobility hampering access to these services at farther distances.

Valleys and Demographics 15 Valleys (Hushey, Thalley, Dhagoni, Shigar, Upper Braldu (Shigar), Lower Braldu (Shigar), Basha (Shigar), Baghicha/Tormik, Astak/Shengus, Haramosh, Bagrote, Ghulmatm, Miachar, Nagar Hunza, Danyore/Jutal/Juglot) - for a total of 150 villages and 19.688 households (population 151.047) – have the use rights of the Park Surface. The use rights percentages are defined considering the percentage of the area of jurisdiction of the aggregate valleys on the total of valleys’ use rights, over the total Buffer Zone surface.

District Valley # Valley Village Household Population

Hushey 170 901 Hushey Kande 166 1079 1 Area Marzigond 73 416 Talis 231 1409 tot 640 3805 757 5829 2 Daghoni Daghoni 428 2739

Tot 1185 8568 Bordas Parangus 208 2240

GANCHE Harangus Tassu 195 1550 Chundu

DISTRICT 3 Thalley Yarkhore 180 1440 Haltaghari 100 800 Broqpa 50 400 Baltoro 182 1456 Daltir 170 1360 Khasumik 70 560 Tot 1155 9806 TOT 2980 22179

24 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Ghzwapa 97 849 Totkhor Markunja 408 3031 Churka Skhora 619 5010 Turoopi Hashupi 388 3276 Pharingbama 112 937 Hurchus 257 2250 Alchori Sildi 81 621 Kashmal 52 410 4 Shigar Yuno 84 640 Thanduro Hyderabad 109 1045 Baha Tissar Lagaf

Chumik

Kahon Kayo 492 4404 Soq Khurid Soggo

DISTRICT SKARDU Ticho Tot 2699 22473 Dassu 166 1190 Dassu Bala Teston 62 473 Nit 104 983 5 Lower Braldu Chaqpo 62 433 Foljo 86 689 Biano Sedar 107 935 Ho 41 217 Tot 628 4920 Pakora 47 338 Hoto 34 242 Chongo 31 268 Sino 38 264 6 Upper Braldu Thongal 51 421 Surongo 43 339 Kurfay 43 410 Monxong 19 166 Askoli 64 654

25 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Tistey 45 482 Tot 415 3584 Thorgo 87 575 Hamisil 100 585 Chutron 61 507 Dogoro 92 816 Bein 54 531 7 Basha Niaslo 74 668 Doko 62 527 Saisko 226 1764 Besil 128 1146 Arindu 130 1063 Arindu Gon Tot 1014 8182 Baghicha 73 569 Khomera 65 489 Dasu 155 1038 Badipa 80 655 Youchung 65 520 Chumik Bazgang 75 600 Harimal 73 584 Khlajing 50 400 8 Baghicha and Tormik Melding 74 592 Toq 50 400 Kashipa 78 624 Khaipa

Bareskor 60 480 Pano 68 544 Kushumal Gialsakhor 65 520 Surbo 75 600 Tot 1106 8615 Jamshaidabad 50 400 Khirizang 70 840 Choksum 45 540 Balay Xong 113 1356 Lagaf 37 436 9 Astak and Shengus Stonging 101 1156 Kakchung 32 364 Mapo 126 1324 Lacho 28 230 Manjar 7 54 Rijing 70 840

26 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Shano 58 840 Burdia 66 795 Soosa 89 1004 Tugla 43 514 Chamachu 100 1143 Shengus 74 823 Tot 1109 12659 TOT 6971 60433 Shoote

Hanochal 223 2141 Sasi 270 2700 Shatot Khaltaro 108 854 10 Haramosh Dache Jutial 330 2276 Barchi 200 2000 Iskere 390 3900 Dasso Tot 1512 13871 Jalalabad Hamaran 31 280 Taysote 149 717 Bilchar 85 493 Girche 12 96 11 Bagrote Sinaker 96 846

DISTRICT GILGIT Hopey 120 812 Datuchi 170 1242 Farfoo 372 3169 Bulche 201 1462 Chirah 125 794 Tot 1361 9911 Danyore 1721 15488 Sultanabad 564 4740 12 Danyore/Jutal/Juglot Jutal 509 3772 Rahimabad 297 2369 Juglot Gooro 200 1499 Tot 3291 27868 TOT 6164 51656 Skandarabad 303 2579 Jaffarabad 225 2264 Nilt 184 1730 13 Ghulmat Thole 113 1273 Ghulmat 265 2297

Pisan 201 1422 DISTRICT NAGAR Minapin 209 1738

27 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Tot 1500 13303 Miachar 390 2848 Dadimal 140 964 Phekar 512 4203 14 Miachar Hakuchar 72 492 Shayar 177 1278 Askqordas 622 4235 Sumayar 819 5815 Tot 2732 19835 Nagar 380 2204 15 Nagar Hopar 243 1315 Hisper 168 1260 Tot 791 4779 TOT 5023 37917 TOT 172185

Community based organizations in CKNP District Gilgit Haramosh Haramosh Development Organization VCC LSO (HDO) Bagrote Dobani Development Organization VCC LSO (DDO) Danyore LSO Danyore LSO Rahimabad Rahimabad Development and VCC Conservation Organization Disctrict Nagar Sikandabad Development Organization VCC - Nagar (I&II) Nonihal Development Organization LSO (NDO) LSO Rakaposhi VCC LSO Hoper Hoper Conservation and Development VCC - Organization Hisper Falahi Tanzeem Bray Tahafuz Qudarti VCC - Wasail District Skardu Nar Goro Social Welfar Association Nar Goro VCC - Tissar Local Support Organization, Tisar - LSO Arndu Arandu Conservation Committee - - Bagicha & Khumera Aga Welfar Organization, Bagicha & VCC - Khemera Tormik Valley Conservation Committee, VCC - Tormik Astak Jamshed Welfare Organization, Astak VCC - Distrcit Shigar Basha Local Support Organization (LSO) VCC LSO Basha Lower Braldo Local Support Organization (LSO) VCC LSO Lower Braldo Local Support Organization Local Support Organization (LSO) VCC LSO (LSO) Upper Braldo Upper Braldo Marapai Local Support Organization (LSO) VCC LSO Marapai Markunja Shigar Town Management VCC LSO (in progress) Development Society Alchori Alchori Conservation Committee VCC -

28 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Churka Valley Conservation Committee, VCC - Churka Wazirpur Valley Conservation Committee VCC - Wazirpur District Ghanche Hushey Village Conservation Committee VCC - Kanday Wildlife Conservation and Welfare VCC - Committee Keris Valley Conservation Committee Keris VCC - Thallay Local Support Organization (LSO), VCC LSO Thallay Daghoni- Local Support Organization, Daghoni- VCC LSO Balghar

Areas requiring community mobilization Several valleys especially the Upper and Lower Braldo valleys are in conflict with CKNP Directorate over the use of park resources including hunting and deforestaion so these valleys should be moblized more. Same some valleys are in good coordination with CKNP and playing their important role in conservation of the natural resources including Haramosh, Basha Hisper, Hushe and Thalley valleys so they must be consulted and need to be mobilzed further.

11. Valley conservation and sustainable development plans (VCSDPs) Villages surrounding the buffer area of CKNP have been defined into 15 distinct valleys. These valleys have been defined by same watersheds, considering some geographical analogies, district appurtenance and other proximity relations. For each valley around CKNP a specific Valley Conservation and Sustainable Development Plan (VCSDP) needed to be prepared to manage core, transition and buffer zone related conservation and development issues. Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan prepared VCSDPs for CKNP which deal with the integrated conservation and sustainable development matters of its 15 valleys namely Danyore, Haramosh, Upper Baraldu, Lower Braldu, Shigar, Astak, Tormik, , Ghulmat, Nagar, Bagrot, Basha, Hoper-Hispar, Nagar and Hushey that fall within CKNP buffer zone and depends upon park resources for subsistence. Integrated Park Management Plan (IPMP) for CKNP (2014) emphasizes to strengthen the community-based organizations (VCCs and LSOs) around CKNP to make them integrated conservation and development bodies, with a view to: a) Institutionalize an integrated conservation and development approach at the community level; b) Empower women and strength representation of communities into the CKNP management process.

29 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

12. CKNP Administrative arrangements The Central Karakorum National Park (CKNP) is currently managed by Project Director with team of 50 members including project Director, Ecologist, Social Organizer, Admin & Finance officer, Range Forest Officers, Game Inspectors, Game Watchers and support staff, and Park Directorate office is established at Skardu. Further the two sub field offices/ visitors registration centers have been established at Askoli and Hushey having CKNP buildings while the one rented building is situated in Hisper where registration process of visitors is in progress. The same staff should continue their duties and accomplished the activities by achieving the Park goals according to below mentioned organizational chart

30 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

THE DEOSAI NATIONAL PARK

1. Introduction/Background Deosai Plateau is one of the most important alpine ecosystems in Pakistan and amongst the highest plateaus of the world, at an average elevation of 13,000 feet above the sea level. In December 1993, Gilgit-Baltistan Administration notified some 3,626 km2 area of the Deosai plain as National Park, mainly to protect the endemic species of Himalayan Brown bear (Ursus arctos isabellinus) in its natural habitat and to maintain the ecological balance of its fragile habitat. DNP harbors some other important species of wildlife. It is well known for its rich flora and fauna. The area is also famous for its floral diversity, which include medical and aromatic plants. Illegal hunting and poaching of wild animals, excessive exploitation of medicinal herbs, over grazing and immoderate tourist flow were amongst the key threats to Park and its natural resources (Haggler Bailey Pakistan). The elevation of Deosai National Park ranges between 3,400 m and 4,500 m above the sea level. The area remains snow bound throughout most of the year. It is category I national park according to IUCN categories of national parks (draft DNP MP 2011). The area of this national park is 3,626 km2. Himalayan Wildlife Foundation (HWF) and Forest and Wildlife Department have started protecting the Himalayan Brown Bear and other biological resources of park since late nineties with its meager resources but desired results could not be achieved and park resources remained under heavy pressure of grazing by communities, nomads and tourists besides global temperature have also been impacting the ecology of the park. No permanent settlements other than jeep road on DNP exist, because of its extreme weather conditions. During summer melt Bakrwalls/Gaffers migrate from AJK and Punjab for using Deosai Plains for grazing their livestock. Grazing is not allowed in core zone of Brown Bear. Northern Areas Wildlife Preservation Act 1975 stands enforced in whole of Gilgit-Baltistan and according to the provision of this Act nobody is allowed to kill hunt, capture or trap any wildlife animal and bird species besides other prohibitions and restrictions.

1.2. History A very short history is known of Deosai National Park. The word Deosai consists of Deo, or Djin, which is the local terminology for spirits and Sai is used for the sitting place, which together mean the “place of spirits”. Deosai served as an important trade route between and Gilgit, and in the pre-partition era, it served as an area where most of the tribal conflicts were resolved. Wars were waged in the Deosai by warriors such as the Dogars, local tribes and the Turks. Its geographic location makes it an important territory from strategic point of view, as it is close to the (LoC) with India, in the Indian held Kashmir.

1.3. Location The Deosai National Park is a high altitude plateau, situated in the Gilgit-Baltistan province of Pakistan at the confluence of three mountain ranges, western , the and . Administratively it falls in Skardu and Astore districts. It is generally divided as Bara (big) and Chota (small) Deosai. Bara Deosai is the main plateau, approximately 30 km in the south of Skardu, accessible from the north through a jeep able road from Skardu that enters the plains via Ali Malik Pass. This jeep road crosses the plains and creeps down into the in the west through the Sheosar Pass near . Connecting jeep roads have recently been added to Matiyal towards the east and Gultari towards the south. There are a number of trails crossing the plains.

31 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Deosai National Park encompasses only the Bara Deosai. This area is the main stronghold of the country’s Brown bear population. Most of the Chota Deosai serves to be an important wildlife corridor between Deosai and Nellum valley in providing the passage for Brown bears to move in between the two luxurious habitats across LoC unrestricted, so far.

2. Boundaries According to the notification of the Northern Areas Administration (1993) now called Gilgit- Baltistan Provincial Government, the boundaries of the Park are described as below:- North: the North boundary traces the watershed of the Tributary nullahs and passes through the water partings and drains into Deosai Nullah through the highest peak of Ali Malik Pass touching the Satpara Game Sanctuary, in . East: The eastern boundary passes through the water partings of the nullah draining into Borbartar and finally joins Brawal nullah at the confluence of small Deosai nullah. South: The southern boundary traces the water partings of the southern tributary nullahs and drains into small Deosai nullah. West: the western boundary is the administrative boundary between Astore Sub Division and Skardu in .

Current Zonation Proper demarcation and zonation is still lacking in case of DNP, and consequently, resource use is not being monitored, excessive exploitation is common in far off valleys, encroachment and habitat fragmentation have also been observed inside the park. In order to monitor and manage park resources effectively, the plan suggests delineating Park boundaries. It also suggests conducting land cover classification, zonation and GIS mapping of different areas to designate strict protection; ecotourism & recreation; livestock grazing; wildlife; restoration and special use zones in the Park and its buffer zone.

32 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

A key aspect in zoning for national parks is consideration of both, use and conservation. In order to strike a balance between use and conservation of resources, while keeping conservation as the priority, without compromising the traditional rights of the dependent local communities and the Gujjar- Bakarwals, the proposed Zones for DNP are;

1. CORE ZONE (IUCN Category Ia): A strict nature reserve maintained to ensure conservation of the Brown Bear; 2. SPECIES MANAGEMENT ZONE (IUCN Category IV): Areas designated for protection of key habitats for different species of the park; 3. WILDERNESS ZONE (IUCN Category Ib): Areas specified to ensure protection of large unmodified to slightly unmodified landscapes, retaining their natural character; 4. SUSTAINABLE USE ZONE (IUCN Category VI): Areas specified for sustainable utilization of natural resources by local communities, visitors and the nomad herders; 5. RECREATIONAL ZONE (IUCN Category VI): Areas specified for camping sites and non-commercial fishing activities in the park.

3. Climate Snow fall starts in September and the area becomes inaccessible by the end of November every year. The weather during the month of July and August remain pleasant. Precipitation in the form of snow ranges from 500 to 700 mm annually. Average daily temperature ranges from -20 °C (Jan-Feb) to 12 °C (July-August). Deosai represents a highland alpine ecosystem characterized by undulating topography with severe climatic and edaphic conditions, supporting dwarfed and stunted vegetation, forming mosaics and flower fields by creating ecological niches and dense moist grasslands at valley plains. DNP (35˚ 56' N and 71˚ 40' E) is an alpine plateau located in the western massif of Himalayas, east of Peak in close proximity of Central Karakoram mountains in GB with an altitudinal range of 3500 to 5200 m. More than half of the plateau is situated between 4000 to 4500 m with average daily

33 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

temperature ranging from –20 ˚C (January-Febraury) to 12 ˚C (July-August). Deosai plains receive higher rainfall than adjoining northern and north eastern valleys of Baltistan due to its geographical location towards monsoon affected outer Himalaya. Annual precipitation varies from 350 to 550 mm- mostly received during winter as snow due to western disturbances. Herbaceous perennials grasses and sedges dominate the vegetation of the plateau.

4. Water resources Sheosar Lake is the main source of water besides streams, small lakes and marsh lands. There are many other small lakes and marshlands, scattered throughout the area. The water is fresh and remains frozen during the winter season. The water table gradually adjusts to the seasons, lowering in the winter and gradually rising during the summer. The plateau is highly significant in terms of watershed value. Three important river systems originate from DNP namely; Shatung, Bara Pani and Kala Pani.

Hydrological Map of DNP

5. Fauna Deosai also hosts a variety of invertebrate and vertebrate fauna: documented fauna include 11 species of large mammals, 13 small mammals, 130 birds, 3 freshwater fishes, one amphibian and two reptiles (Nawaz et al., 2006).It is famous for main string hold of Brown Bear since long. Main species of wildlife include Himalayan Brown Bear (Ursus arctos), Himalayan Ibex (Capra ibex siberica), Snow Leopard (Uncia uncia) and Tibetan Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes montana). Golden are very common. Birds’ species include Horned lark, Citrine Wagtail, Mountain Finch, Eastern Swift, Crag martin. In wetlands, Common Teal, Shoveler and Dippers are found.

5.1. Brown Bear Deaosai the land of Giants possess legendary creature Brown Bear. The Himalayan Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) is found in Deosai plateau. It is threatened species and comparatively smaller than Alaska Bear. Its color varies from dark reddish brown to light standy shades. Brown Bear is characterized by a

34 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

distinctive hump on its shoulder, a slight dished profile of the face and long claws on the front paws. In Pakistan, it is restricted to alpine meadows and sub alpine scrub. Brown bear have been seen in Rama and Biafo glacier. Few Brown bears are suspected to be found in and Khunjrab National Park. Brown Bear is an omnivorous animal and mainly eats grasses, sedges, bulbs and roots of plants and also eats rodents such as rats, ground squirrels, marmots and fishes. Sometimes, it incidentally kills domestic and sheep. During winter it hibernates (winter dormancy). During the breeding season a male associate with female only for two weeks and mating start from May to mid of July, while the baby bears born from the month of January to March. The population of brown bear in 1993 was 19, it increased to 43 in 2006, 62 in 2009, 73 in 2015 and according DNP officials the current population is 76 to 80 individuals. There is a continuous threat to brown bear population in all locals of its existence due to the poaching of young cubs. The little bears are captured by gypsy tribes for taming them for circus shows and dancing. Various hunters are also threat to this important animal, who kill bears to obtain its skin, fats and other body organs for sale in the market.

DNP Mammals N Classification Scientific Name Common Name 1 Order: Carnivore Ursus arctos isabellinus Himalayan Brown Bear Family: Ursidae Genus:Ursus 2 Family: Felidae Uncia uncial Snow leopard Genus:Felis Sub Genus:Uncia 3 Family:Canis Vulpes lupus chanco Tibetan Wolf Genus:Vulpes 4 Genus:Vulpes Vulpes vulpes Montana Tibetan Red Fox

5 Family:Mustelidae Martes foina Martes foina Beach or Sub family:Mustelinea Stone Marten Genus:Martes 6 Genus:Mustela Mustela ermine Tailed Weasal

7 Mustela altaica Alpine or Pale Weasal

8 Sub Family:Lutrinae Lutra lutra kutab Himalayan or Common Genus:Lutra Otter 9 Order:Artiodactyla Moschus moschiferus Musk Deer Sub-order:Ruminanatia Family:Cervidae Sub-Family:Moschus Genus:Moschus 10 Family:Bovidae Capra ibex sibirica Himalayan or Siberian Sub-family:Caprinae Ibex Genus:Capra 12 Genus:Ovis Ovis orientalis vignei Ladakh Urial or Shapu

13 Order:Lagomorpha Lepus capensis Cape Hare Family:Leporidae Genus:Lepus

35 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

N Classification Scientific Name Common Name 14 Family:Ochotonidae Ochotona macrotis Large Eared Pika Genus:Ochotona 15 Order:Rodentia Marmota caudate Golden Family:Sciuridae Genus:Marmota 16 Family:Dipodidae Sicista concolor Chines Birch Mouse Sub Family:Sicistinae Genus:Sicista 17 Family:Muridae Apodemus sylraticus Wood or Feiled Mouse Sub Family:Murinae Genus:Apodemus 18 Genus:Rattus Rattus turkestanicus Turkestan Rat

19 Genus:Rattus Rattus turkestanicus House Mouse

20 Genus:Mustela Mus musculus House Mouse

21 Family:Cricetidae Alticola roylei Royle,s High Mountain Sub Family:Microtinae Vole Genus:Alticola 22 Genus:Hyperacrius Hyperacrius fertilis True,s Burrowing Vole

23 Order:Insectivora Sorex minutes Red Toothed Shrew or Family:Soricidae Lesser/Pigmy Shrew Genus:Sorex 24 Orde:Carnivora Felis bengalensis Leopard Cat Family:Felidae Genus:Felis 25 Order:Chiroptera Eoglacomys fimbriatus Kashmir flying squirrel

26 Pipistrellus sp Apodemus wardi Wood mouse

6. Flora Deosai plateau is lying between sub alpine and glacial fields, where shrubs and forbs are found. It is famous for its rich medicinal and aromatic plant species. Deosai plains are alpine zone lying between sub alpine and glacial fields. Shrubs and forbs are dominant. The climax vegetation represents forbs in meadows. Only goats and can utilize this rugged area. At the higher altitude (Above 14000ft) the topography is extremely rugged and grazing is almost impossible. The plains are a floral extravaganza of the summer months with a recorded number of 582 species. The flora of Deosai is influenced by four major floristic elements: Boreoalpine and Circumpolar; the Euro- Siberain; Southern European/ Mediterranean and Siberian-Mongolian. Examples of genera found with their affinities, include; Boreoalpine & Circumpolar-species of zoogeographic and floral affinities. Ranuncullus, Saxifraga, and Polygonum; Euro-Siberain- Geranium, Bupleurum and Oxytropis, southern European/Mediterranean-Delphinium, Swerita and Thymus, Siberain-Mongolian-Saussurea, Lagotis and Pleurospermum. Other minor floristic elements on the plains such as the Sino-Himalayan, included Cremanthodium and Picrorhiza.

36 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

7. Conservation Measures in DNP In the year 1993, Himalayan Wildlife Protect (HWP) implemented a project funded by an international donor by Himalayan Wildlife Foundation (HWF) for the protection of Himalayan Brown bear as this animal was quite vulnerable from extinction. A team of experts surveyed the area for two months in 1993 and evaluated the status of Brown bear. This team estimated a total population of 19 bears on both sexes in the area. This was a landmark towards protection and conservation of this wonderful animal species. The Administration of Gilgit Baltistan also declared the Deosai plains as “ Deosai National Park”. The HWF team efforts for the conservation of Brown Bear in Deosai are commendable. In 1996, seven brown bear were collard with radio transmitters by HWF to monitor the movements of this valuable animal. The park and Wildlife Department Gilgit Baltistan implemented North Areas Wildlife Preservation Act 1975 and stopped hunting and poaching of wildlife in Gilgit Baltistan including DNP besides conducting survey of wildlife of DNP and detailed observation of Brown Bear was also started every year during July to October. At present the Brown bear population has increased and their current population as per the census of Park and Wildlife Department Gilgit Baltistan is 76 to 80.

8. Management Planning of Deosai National Park In order to assist the government and local communities for sustainable management of the critical alpine ecosystem of Deosai plains, the Himalayan Wildlife Project (HWP) wrote a draft management plan for the Park, mainly based upon its two-years socio-economic and ecological research on the plateau from 1992-1994, which somehow, could not be approved and hence could not be implemented mainly because of technical and financial constraints, at that time. The plan aimed to protect Himalayan Brown bear in Deosai Plains. However its separate operational objectives were designed to address the development of natural processes, minimize the negative impacts of human activities, improve socio economic condition of people and promote research for the scientific management. But the plan did not thoroughly discuss the appropriate management approaches & strategies, research topics related to park issues, community involvement & ownership, legal & policy support, conflicts and ways for conflict management, boundary delineation & demarcation and sustainable resource use practices. For this purpose in November 2007, the Directorate of DNP requested WWF-Pakistan for technical assistance to review and update the HBP drafted Management Plan, mainly based upon its three decadal experience of community based conservation in Gilgit-Baltistan, on conservation of unique species and fragile ecosystems, for socio-ecological uplift of the area. Then WWF Pakistan has prepared a draft Management Plan for DNP in 2011. It was then further updated and approved by Government of Gilgit Baltistan in 2016. This plan elaborately highlights important aspects pertaining to DNP, besides detailed conservation and developmental strategies.

9. DNP Community Eight valleys, namely, Sadpara, Katesho, Dhappa, Karabosh, Gultari, Das-Khirim, Shagarthang and Bubin, serving as entry points into the Park, surround the park. The total population of the villages is approximately 12,584; living in 1,321 households. Balti and Shina are the two languages but a minority of Gujjars also speaks Gujjari. Noorbukhshi, Shia and Sunni are the main sects of that inhibit the surrounding valleys. There are about 17 primary and 5 middle schools in the Park vicinity. Literacy rate is comparatively low amongst the Park communities (33.89%). Subsistence agriculture and livestock herding are the two major sources of livelihood and family income, whereas, a limited number of people, particularly from an age range of 20-50; are also associated with the tourism industry.

37 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

High altitude and extreme climatic conditions although restricted permanent habitation in DNP, however it is burdened with stakes of many settlements along the outskirts. The villages are located in surrounding valleys and exercise different resource uses in Deosai, especially traditional grazing, fishing at large scale to supplement winter nutritional imbalances, grass collection and fuelwood extractions. The livelihood system of these alpine communities is based on centuries old agro-pastoralism and hence the ecology of Deosai plain’s alpine pastures is shaped with influence of their interaction with these resources. The peripheral communities utilize the outer slopes and peripheral valleys of DNP for grazing. The communities have traditional grazing rights inside the demarcated boundaries of DNP and take livestock to summer pastures in eastern and northern edges of DNP. Bakarwals or Gujjars, coming from lowlands have also customary grazing rights in Deosai plains, further intensifying the grazing pressures. Nearly 9000 livestock consisting chiefly of goats and sheep belonging to resident and nomad pastoralists were present within DNP. Certain communities and nomadic Gujjars have customary grazing rights in Deosai Plateau at pre-defined boundary limits.

9.1. Land use for grazing There is no permanent settlement on Deosai Plains due to extreme weather conditions. However, Gujar Bakarwals migrating from the lowlands have been using Deosai as grazing fields for their livestock and also sometimes use to sell off their animals to local people, particularly to Astori and Balti dwellers. In the summer months, people from the surrounding villages take advantage of the vegetation for gazing. Summer grazing is again restricted from mid-July till August. The adjacent villages have a gentlemen agreement and verbal understanding amongst themselves on grazing areas. As per the agreement, villagers from the Satpara valley graze their herds in the east, Katichu and Mehdiabad in the eastern and southern fringes, Chilam and Das villagers graze their livestock in the eastern and southern parts of the plateau. The central Deosai and its Western flanks are grazed by the nomadic Gujjars who travel to the area from the plains Punjab. The Gujjars dominate the Chota Deosai and seldom cross over to the eastern side of the main stream due to long standing rights there of the people of Gultari area.

9.2. Infrastructure: There is no permanent infrastructure, other than the jeep roads and trails crossing the plains. A rest house near the Kalapani is formally operated by the public works department (PWD) and now lies in ruins. The bridge on the jeep road crossing the Barapani is built around mid-July every year and planks are put off by late-October to avoid damage from the winter snow.

38 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

9.3. Tourism The ideal tourist season in Deosai starts from mid-June till the end of September, depending upon the prevailing weather conditions and accessibility through the only jeep able road. The flow of local tourists to Deosai plains is usually high as compared to national and international tourists, making tourism an economically least productive activity for the resident communities. The plateau has immense ecotourism potential for outdoor recreation in terms of sightseeing, jeep safari, trekking and trophy hunting opportunities in the adjoining buffer zone valleys. DNP has unique and contrasting alpine wetland complex in shape of a number of rivers, numerous streams, marshes and peatlands, and high altitude lakes. Efforts are underway to designate the Deosai Wetland Complex as a Ramsar Site for its importance as resting place of certain residential and migratory birds of international importance. This will be the first Ramsar Site in northern parts of the country beyond Taunsa Barrage and Tanda Dam, as the entire 19 Ramsar Sites of the country are mainly concentrated towards the southern coastal zone or in central parts of the country along Indus.

9.4. Community interest in Park management Both the stakeholder communities of Astore and Skardu realize the economic importance and socio- ecological significance of Deosai plains, as they consider Deosai as an important biodiversity hotspot and more interestingly as a peculiar habitat for Himalayan Brown bear in the whole of Asia. They also think that, its geographical location makes it an important strategic point in the country and also main source to connect them with the rest of country, being situated at the cross roads of western Himalayas, linking Astore, Skardu, Gilgit, Chillas, Azad Kashmir and many other surrounding valleys. According to Ev-K2-CNR recent consultative meetings with stakeholders, it was known that in the buffer zone community of DNP lakes in formal community based organizations but there are informal community organizations in Satapara valley and in Chillam side of DNP. Agriculture and livestock are the two major sources of livelihoods and according to the local people, both the sources of their family income do flourish due to Deosai as it provides water for irrigation and

39 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

drinking. Its forests are only sources of fuel and firewood for them, lush green alpine pastures provide fodder and grazing grounds to their livestock and offer medicinal herbs to poor villagers. However, having a natural tourist destination in the shape of Deosai next to their homes, they are quite optimistic and hopeful that, one day, it would be a great source of income for them and their families. Contrary to the hopes that they have attached to Deosai, they appear to be least satisfied with the prevailing park management system. They stressfully mentioned of the lack of their involvement and community based approaches yet to be adopted by the park management to engage with them for the Park. They realize that Deosai could bring a flood of economic opportunities for them, if it is managed in a sustainable way. They explicitly expressed their interest and willingness to join hands with the park management in protection and management of park resources on long term basis, given the opportunity, trust and recognition for their involvement and participation in the park management is guaranteed.

10. Emerging threats and conservation challenges Information gathered through above stakeholders’ consultations, careful analytical review of key documents including Management Plan and research thesis reveal the following conservation challenges and threats to DNP:

Encroachment into wildlife habitat by Gujjar bakarwals Grazing of livestock in Deosai degrades the vegetation cover, and creates disturbance for wildlife. In addition to grass and plants consumed by the livestock, the nomads remove bushes that provide cover to the wildlife and protect the soils from degradation, for use as firewood. Horses and sheep dogs brought in by the Bakarwals threaten the wild animals, which therefore avoid the areas occupied by nomad herders. Grazing in Deosai is also a traditional practice of communities living on the northeastern borders of the park. The threat to the national park from the Bakarwals, however, is considerably higher as the Bakarwals have been rapidly expanding the number of livestock with over 24% increase during 2000- 2013 (n=5500 in 2013), and their areas of use in the recent past. As an indication the valleys of Phialung and Lamalung located northwest of the Ali Malik entrance to the park which were previously available to the bears have now been taken over by the nomads. Similarly, the nomad herders started moving into the valleys along the southern boundary of the park east of the Wolf Peak, after 2005, when the controls exercised by the Wildlife Department became lax. The areas in use and number of livestock grazed by resident communities (about 1500) has not increased that fast.

Damage to habitat and disturbance to wildlife by visitors Studies show that the number of visitors to Deosai has constantly been increasing ever since Deosai was notified as a protected area. Major practices observed and reported that are damaging to the park environment include off-track driving, illicit fishing and littering. It has been noted that the visitors in the absence of Park’s field staff, drive freely into the core area for bears located south of Bara Pani, primarily for off track four wheel driving and fishing, especially in the area from Shatung to Bara Pani using nets and rods. Littering is also common in high tourist influx areas like Bara Pani and the Sheosar Lake.

Inappropriate planning of infrastructure Deosai being a notified protected area, a strict policy of no permanent structures has been followed to date; the authorities demolished even a partially completed structure previously constructed by a local person at Shatung, to maintain the natural integrity of the Park. A building constructed close to the

40 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Bara Pani Bridge for the staff of Works Department for maintenance of the bridge, is illegitimate by all means. Allowing construction of such structures will be very harmful to the park, as this is likely to start a trend of erecting ugly concrete buildings in Deosai wilderness, a building that does not fit into this landscape will be an anomaly at the location, and its associated toilets may seep into adjacent river, which is presently of drinking water quality. Currently, the toilets maintained by the Department are at least a 100 m away from the river.

Damage to habitat and landscape by construction contractors Some important and useful infrastructure like bridges and roads is necessary for the visitors in terms of safety, lower costs, and reduced travel times, as well as for the Department as it improves access and helps in maintaining the integrity of the park, through due diligence, effective control and watch & ward. However, the construction contractors often not aware of the sensitivity of the Park and standard practices followed in National Parks while using local construction materials i.e., sand, stones and gravels for construction do not heed for restoration of the key habitats (fish hatching & breeding areas, marshlands and rocky areas) disturbed by construction. The overall impact of these threats would be considerably negative on the park’s biodiversity, its conservation and sustainable management. It will directly affect the remnant population of Himalayan Brown bear and other associated wildlife species that are the main components of the ecosystem. The longer impact would be more severe; a wilderness on the face of the earth will get faded. Possibly by defining the park boundaries and different Zones on scientific basis, involving all stakeholder communities effectively in the park’s decision support mechanisms, identifying their stakes equitably, providing them with appropriate alternatives for affected livelihoods, energy needs and for sustainable socio-economic and ecological development, ensuring an effective administrative setup, equitable distribution of park benefits amongst communities, maintaining proper check and balance in resource use especially that of pastures, fish and wildlife, the existing as well as emerging park issues can be managed , and the flow of park’s socio-economic and ecological services can be sustained in the longer term.

Area requiring community mobilization Lack of adequate coordination and collaboration amongst major stakeholders, undefined park boundaries and ambiguous state of user rights amongst communities is a major hurdle in collaborative management of the Park and that is the strong reason for DNP to remain, without implementation of a sound management plan. Rigorous community mobilization is required in Chillim side of the Park (District Astore) and Satpara valley in Skardu Districts as both the communities have use rights inside the park and they are in conflict with one another over administrative demarcation and with DNP office over entry fee distribution mechanism.

Park Administration At present, the Park is being administered by an eighteen-grade official of the Gilgit- Baltistan Forest & Wildlife department, as DFO/WLMO, having an established directorate at Skardu. Wildlife Management Officer (WLMO) is officially responsible to look after all technical, administrative and financial affairs of the Park. Under him, is strength of 17 regular staff including 01 RFO, 12 Game Watchers and 04 Admin personnel. Thirty-three staffs have been working against the present proposed, though majority of them are engaged on short-term contractual basis. The number and placement of regular staffs is as under:

41 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

References Ali Nawaz, M. 2013. Ecology, Genetics and Conservation of Himalayan Brown. PhD Thesis. 29 pp

Hussain, Z., S. N. Mirza, M. I. Ashraf, S. M. Nizami. 2015. Grassland productivity and carrying capacity of Deosai National Park. J. Agric. Res., 53(3)

Mari F., M. Gallo, A.A. Khan, D. Milanesi, V. Carminati, E. Vuillermoz, A. Hassain, R.ul Hassan, A. Ali, Y.A. Rizvi, 2014. Management Plan for Central Karakorum National Park.485 + 118 pp.

Mustafa, N., M. Aurang Zaib, G. Musa Shimshali, A. A. Khan, M. Gallo, A. Hussain, R. Ul-Hassan, E. Vuillermoz, L. Listo, M. Raza, N. Nazar, Y. Abbas, A. Khan, R. Pyara, R. Abid, Y. Rivi. 2016. Conservation and Sustainable Development Plan for CKNP Valleay. Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Eds.

WWF Pakistan (2016). Management Plan for Deosai National Park, Gilgit-Baltistan, WWFPakistan, Gilgit. © GCIC, World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) – Pakistan DNP Management Plan

42 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 3: LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE LOCAL PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP (LPAG)

LPAG will be composed of at least one selected senior representative of all the stakeholders to the project. This will include the following:

NAME POSITION Prof. Dr. Mauzzam Nizami Director Integrated Mountain Area Research Center (IMARC), Karakorum International University, Gilgit Mr. Yaqub Ali Khan Conservator Parks & Wildlife Gilgit-Baltistan Mr. Abid Ali Director Central Karakorum National Park, Skardu Mr. Muhammad Akram Director Environmental Protection Agency, Gilgit. Mr. Shehzad Hussain Shigri Wildlife Management Officer, Deosai National Park, Astor Mr. Muhammad Iqbal Director Tourism Development, Gilgit Mr. Asghar Mehmood Director Agriculture, Gilgit Mr. Muhammad Riaz Director Agriculture, Skardu Mr. Muhammad Ibraheem Director Livestock, Gilgit Baltistan Dr. Ghulam Raza Head of Department of Biological Sciences, University of Baltistan, Skardu Mr. Saeed Abbas Regional Coordinator WWF-Pakistan, Gilgit Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan Regional Coordinator Ev-K2-CNR, Gilgit Mr. Sahibzada Irfanullah Khan National Project Manager, CKNP Project, UNDP Pakistan, Islamabad

LPAG members will be approved by Secretary Forest, Wildlife and Environment, GoGB/PMU.

43 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 4: MINUTES OF THE 1ST MEETING OF THE LOCAL PROJECT ADVISORY GROUP

LPAG members have been identified and initial consultation have been carried out. In this regards LPAG ToRs are reported as results of those initial discussions. ToRs detailed LPAG role and its functioning. LPAG first meeting, as requested by UNDP National Project Manager, will be held on July 9, thus, considering that the deadline for the delivery of the inception report is June 30, the meeting minutes will be delivered in the next progress report (Q3). In the meantime a draft meeting agenda is also reported.

Terms of Reference

Local Project Advisory Group Improvement of Central Karakorum National Park Management System as Model of Mountain Protected Areas in Northern Pakistan 1. Purpose The Local Project Advisory Group (LPAG) will support the implementation of the project activities at Gilgit Baltistan level by providing technical support in matters related to the project components to ensure delivery of expected outputs as per approved work plan and in compliance with set procedures.

2. Composition A LPAG will be composed of at least one selected senior representative of all the stakeholders to the project. This will include the following:

1. Director Integrated Mountain Area Research Center (IMARC), Karakorum International University, Gilgit 2. Conservator Parks & Wildlife Gilgit-Baltistan 3. Director Central Karakorum National Park, Skardu 4. Director Environmental Protection Agency, Gilgit. 5. Wildlife Management Officer, Deosai National Park, Astor 6. Director Tourism Development, Gilgit 7. Director Agriculture, Gilgit 8. Director Agriculture, Skardu 9. Director Livestock, Gilgit Baltistan 10. Head of Department of Biological Sciences, University of Baltistan, Skardu 11. Regional Coordinator WWF-Pakistan, Gilgit 12. Regional Coordinator Ev-K2-CNR, Gilgit 13. National Project Manager, CKNP Project, UNDP Pakistan, Islamabad The formation of a LPAG and its initial composition will be approved by Secretary Forest, Wildlife and Environment, GoGB/PMU. The LPAG in its 1st meeting will select the Chair who will preside over the meetings onwards.

44 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

3. Meeting Schedules Meetings will be held on quarterly basis. Virtual meetings are preferred where possible to avoid travel costs. However there should be at least twice face-to face meetings per year. Meetings may also be tied to other scheduled meetings to save costs.

4. Responsibilities The LPAG onquarterlybasis will: a. Assist the Project Implementing Partners at GB level in implementation of the CKNP project in accordance with set procedures, processes and work plans.The Group will provide technical advice in taking strategic decisions relating to the project implementation in Gilgit-Baltistan; b. Review the progress of project against approved work plans by PMUand provide technical guidance in case of issues, or conflict. c. Identify gaps in the implementation of projects and programmes; suggest suitable measures to strengthen weak areas; d. Participate in key meetings and workshops of the project, and seek opportunities for collaboration and advocacy at relevant forums e. Assist in developing liaison with other organizations and institutions to enhance the networking and visibility of the project and cultivate cross-organization awareness through networking opportunities.

5. Minutes Minutes for each meeting of the LPAG meetings will be documented and shared all the members of the group after approval from the Chair.The WWF-P Regional office at Gilgit will be the secretariat for this group and will be responsible for maintenance of record for the Phase –I of the project while Secretariat will be shifted to EvK2CNR Office in Gilgit in Phase-II.

******************************************

Draft Agenda Local Project Advisory Group (LPAG) Meeting July 9, 2018 Background: The LPAG is intended to provide support and strategic guidance in the implementation of the CKNP Project as per approved work plan also considering the defined roles and responsibilities in the ToRs document. One meeting per quarter has been termed mandatory in the ToRs.

In the same respect, the first meeting of the advisory group was scheduled to be held on June 25th in the work plan of EvK2CNR However on the advice of UNDP meeting has been postponed to July 9th to be held at WWF office Gilgit.

Below is the proposed agenda for the upcoming first meeting of LPAG;

Participants: As listed in the ToRs.

45 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Discussion Items

Estimated N. Items Facilitated by time 1. Introduction of the participants 10 minutes WWF 2. Selection of the chair of LPAG for year 2018. 10 minutes UNDP 3. Orientation of the project 20 minutes UNDP Orientation on the current activities in CKNP/DNP  An overview of the past achievements with 4. 15 minutes EvK2CNR/WWF regard to management planning and livelihood activities of EvK2CNR and WWF Discussion on the approved work plan and activities  Deliberations and seek advice on new 5. 60 minutes EvK2CNR/WWF initiatives including ecological corridor and associated actions Discussion on any issues or challenges faced by the 6. implementing organizations in the field and seek 30 minutes EvK2CNR/WWF assistance for possible solutions 7. Way forward and Vote of Thanks 15 minutes UNDP

46 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 5: MOUs WITH RELEVANT GOVT. DEPARTMENTS SIGNED

The MoUs already signed with concerned Authorities are provided in Annex I. Those agreement will facilitate project implementation and networking in the area of study:

N Govt. Department Subjects of the MoU 1 GB Forests, Wildlife & 1. Facilitate Park MP(s) approval and implementation Environmental Dept. (GB 2. Cooperate in the launching of new projects on climate Govt.) change mitigation and adaptation and watershed management in the Upper Indus Basin and in the implementation of REDD+ Projects 3. Cooperate in implementing a Biosphere Reserve Model for CKNP 4. Provide institutional support to Ev-K2-CNR activities. 5. Cooperate in new initiative in the field of Cabpacity Building and Institutional Development.

2 Ministry of Interior – Govt. of Allow and support Ev-K2-CNR socio-economic and Pakistan development initiatives.

47 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 6: CONSULTATION MEETINGS WITH COMMUNITIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS IN CKNP AND DNP

Meetings with the communities of CKNP/DNP and government officials (May 30-June 07, 2018)

Introduction After the inception of the project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan”, the first consultation session of Ev-K2-CNR team comprising Project Coordinator, Consultant NRM and Consultant Community Mobilization was made to Baltistan and Gilgit regions from May 30 to June 7 2018 to meet communities and government authorities. The purpose of the meetings was to discuss about project outcomes, activities and possible ways of collaboration and support from government institutions. Furthermore, it intended to seek support from the communities, also knowing about their expectations, challenges they are faced with. Minutes of all meetings are provided in Annex II.

Meetings At first meetings with the directorate of CKNP and DNP were held in Skardu to discuss the objectives, activities, timelines and other details of the project. The discussion also covered how it was important to have support from both offices in the successful implementation of the project. The Director of CKNP and District Forest Officer (in charge of DNP) assured to provide all kind of support. Any existing research reports and materials/data were agreed to make available to Ev-K2-CNR. A joint meeting of Ev-K2-CNR, Directorate of CKNP and DNP was held to discuss about the idea of establishing an ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP. Different sites considering an easy access and nearby wildlife habitats were discussed and proposed taking also into account many challenges associated with the idea. However, some more visits will be carried out to select at least two or three sites to further work on. Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Office organized a meeting with Regional Coordinator of Economic Transformation Initiative (ETI-IFAD) Project Baltistan. The agenda of the meeting was to discuss about possible ways to creating the synergies and collaboration between the UNDP project the interventions of ETI. The Regional Coordinator informed that ETI was already working on value chain, construction of water channels etc in various buffer zone valleys of CKNP and DNP. As part of the meetings with the communities, the first meeting held with the community of Sadpara; an important village in the buffer zone of the DNP. The project, its objectives its activities and intended role of the communities were discussed with them. Beside several other important points, the

48 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

community of Sadpara shared their issues particularly related to climate change hazards whereby there have been continuous flash floods for last few years causing them massive destruction of land and even loss of human lives. EvK2CNR assured to work closely with the relevant government institutions to draw their attention for adaptation and mitigation measures in the village. Subsequently a visit to the Thaley valley (CKNP) was made to meet the community. The project was introduced to the community stating in detail how it would deliver to them and what was expected of them in making the project a success. The community posed to be very organized working highly united under the LSO. The community turned very cooperative and assured to have their cooperation during the project interventions. The project coordinator, consultant NRM and consultant community mobilization, after meetings in Baltistan visited Gilgit and met with the Secretary Agriculture Gilgit-Baltistan. An orientation on the details of the UNDP project was given to him. He appreciated the proposed activities and promised to extend any needed support from the department of agriculture, livestock and fisheries. An important meeting was convened with Deputy Secretary Forest, Wildlife and Environment GB to brief him on the details of the project his department being the major custodian. He was informed about the recent visit to Baltistan region, meetings with directorates and the communities. The DS applauded the mains features of the project including the idea of establishing a corridor and to carry out the preliminary associated work. He assured of cooperation and support from the department for the project implementation and to play possible role in the sustainability.

Conclusion Stakeholders play an essential role in any project. EvK2CNR will continue to work closely with the communities and government institutions which is pivotal for any project to reach success and for its sustainability afterwards. A national park, mainly owes its management to the communities living in its buffer zones who agree to comply with the customary and statuary laws. As a matter of fact the communities of CKNP and DNP will have a strong role in the successful implementation of the project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan”. Thus a close liaison will be established with the communities, government institutions, organizations implementing projects with crosscutting themes and other stakeholders.

49 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 7: SURVEY FOR TRAINING NEED ASSESSMENT

The following section describes the general methodology used and approved at international level to perform a Training Need Assessment Program. In the next stage those general indications, published by IUCN, will be adapted to this project, in order to carry out a TNA designed for the study area and able to respond to the needs of local Park managers, communities, concerned stakeholders and authorities.

A Training Need Assessment program follow the classic project cycle and within Protected Areas management, it is designed to respond to the needs of future trainees.

Project Cycle (IUCN, 2011)

Identifying training needs should precede any learning initiative from one-day seminars to a series of courses. The TNA helps training institutions by:  enhancing the practical effect of learning;  helping to avoid useless investments of funds and effort;  ensuring a good atmosphere during the workshop as expectations of participants are met;  helping create a good image for the training institutions without costly investment in PR;  facilitating dialogue between the training institution and the government;  aligning training to other human resource processes at the PA such as performance management, development of competency standards etc.;  providing a baseline for the evaluation of training efficacy and planning future training;  providing a base for developing a capacity-building strategy for the PA system.

Assess different PA staff capacities To have an initial idea on how to develop the training program, it is necessary to send a first questionnaire to the participants including very common questions, such as: personal data, work experience, professional position, previous trainings attended.

The principal question for the TNA is the scale of the sample, which means that more PAs staff of the region could be involved, more representative would be the obtained results. The scale of the sample

50 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

will not significantly increase the amount of work if the multi-level approach to TNA is applied. This means training managers only communicate with the heads of PAs asking their assistance in forwarding questionnaires to their middle management, who are then responsible for collecting data from the field staff. The questionnaire templates for each staff level are developed by training managers who send them together with a letter to the PA director. PA staff are not responsible for analyzing information – just for filling in the questionnaires. To facilitate and speed up this process use the “administrative resource” if possible: ask staff of PA agencies to send an official request for information to all PAs. Also the informal relations had with these people could be a good drivers to help move the survey forward. Considering that PA managers are not always aware of their training needs themselves, one possible solution could be the technique of crosscheck questioning. The method is very simple: if you want Mr Y to participate in your training, you ask three people to fill in your questionnaire – Y, X who is Y’s direct supervisor and Z who is directly under Y in the PA hierarchy. Prepare a series of indirect questions for X and Z that will allow you to assess the skills of Y (leadership, communication, team building, partnership etc.) and reveal some problems within the organization of Y’s work. It is particularly useful to compare the responses from X and Z and try to understand the origin of any differences. While composing the TNA questionnaire, three principal points you should be planned to be addressed: knowledge, skills and attitudes. Knowledge could be achieved in the form of lectures on the chosen subject, by providing trainees with materials to read after the course, while to influence trainees’ attitudes a series of different training techniques has to be applied. For the “knowledge level”, it is sufficient to include only direct questions which will reveal what the managers know and then compare it to what they should be aware of, according to their job description. Ask about professional background, work experience, on-the-job training, foreign languages etc. For the “skills level”, add indirect questions which will help to evaluate communication, presentation, leadership, technical and other skills. Finally, you should add questions which reveal attitudes. Examples of this type of question include managers’ perceptions of the PA system as a whole and of their PA, of difficulties and constraints they have to face in their daily work, whether they feel useful given their position and why so, what do they lack for self-satisfaction in their job etc.

Ways and means of identifying training needs 1. Gather and record information  Think about who will gather and record the information (will you do it yourself, will you ask others to help you – if so, who, and do they need training to use the method(s) you have chosen?).  When recording information, try to do it in such a way that you can start immediately to sort it out (leave some space for your own notes; use different colour pens for different themes/ categories of information; use codes to identify different groups of respondents etc.). 2. Analyze and interpret information  Think ahead to sharing your results – if you know what you want to share and how, you can sort your information accordingly (i.e., extract it from the notes/sources where it was gathered).  Review all the information – consider using a small team to do this independently and then pool the results.  Identify and prioritize all the issues – it is useful to decide if your focus is on qualitative results, (e.g., trends) and/or quantitative results (e.g., frequency of responses).

51 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Method A: Questionnaire Tips for developing a good questionnaire  Review existing questionnaires from other sources before automatically starting from scratch and developing your own.  Keep the questionnaires short and simple.  Test (pilot) the questionnaire first with a small group that is representative of your sample. Ensure that you provide clear instructions (including how and by when to return completed questionnaires to you).  Include an explanatory covering letter.  Consider using alternative distribution methods (such as via contact person, e-mail, etc.).  Include a short introductory paragraph to explain the purpose of your survey and highlight the anonymous character of your research. Use different fonts to make information more readable. Thank your respondents at the very beginning of the questionnaire.  Mix various types of questions: open and closed, direct and indirect etc.  Always leave room for an “other(s)” response.

Example of questionnaire to assess training needs

1. Have you ever participated in training courses/in-service training/placements?

□ Yes □ No

If yes, please list ALL training in the field of PA management that you have taken part in:

How do you assess the efficacy of What was the most Training provider that training for you? Training topic Duration useful for you in that and dates (please, put a score from 0 (no seminar? effect) to 5 (very useful)

2. How satisfied are you with your current job? (put a score from 0 to 100 percent):

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

3. What attracts you most in your current job?

______

4. What is your biggest success in your current job?

______

5. What part of your job is the most problematic for you?

______

6. List the principal difficulties (2 or 3) of your current job?

52 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

______

7. What keeps you from doing your job well?

______

8. What does work at the PA mean for you?

______

9. Are you planning to continue working in your current position for the next … : year □Yes □ No 3 years □Yes □ No 5 years □Yes □ No 10 years □Yes □ No

If you are thinking of changing your working place, what are the factors that influenced your decision at most? - Salary - Relations within the team - Policy of your bosses - Unstable situation in the PA system in Russia - You are no longer interested in what you’re doing - Uncertain future - Lack of social package - Lack of career prospects - Lack of self-development opportunities - Difficult working conditions and safety risks - Other (please be precise): ______

10. What training topics would be the most interesting for you to participate in? (Range in order of importance): ______

1 PA management, strategic planning and HR management 2 Environmental education and interaction with local communities 3 Visitor centres and nature museums 4 Eco-tourism development 5 Patrolling PAs: organization of work 6 Scientific monitoring and research 7 Training-of-trainers on environmental education, eco-tourism, patrolling etc. 8 Management planning 9 Alternative livelihood programmes 10 Economics and financial management 11 PR and fundraising 12 Interaction with decision makers, business and local communities 13 The school of PA accountants 14 PAs and tourist companies: ways of interaction 15 Sustainable resource management 16 Other 17 Other

53 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Example of questionnaire to evaluate concrete skills and knowledge of different PA staff categories, including thematic questions for environmental education specialists.

1. What questions would you like to discuss during training? (please mark 5–6 items in order of importance) - Methods of environmental education work - Psychological aspects of interaction with local communities - Eco-tourism development - Legal aspects of nature conservation in Pakistan - History of environmental education work in Pakistan PAs - Others (please be precise): ______

2. How long have you been working in: - environmental education? ______- eco-tourism? ______

3. Please, assess your experience in environmental education on a scale of 0 to 5: (0 – no experience at all, 5 – consider myself an expert)

______

4. What problems do you usually face while working with local communities?

______

______

5. Have you ever organized an ecological tour? If yes, what exactly did you do?

______

______

6. What methods do you use in your work with visitors at your visitor centre?

______

7. Does your PA have: - interactive visitor centre □Yes □ No - nature museum □Yes □ No - equipped ecological trails □Yes □ No - educational toolkits for schoolchildren □Yes □ No - educational toolkits for adults □Yes □ No

8. What’s the difference between the visitor centre and the nature museum?

______

______

54 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

9. You are starting your usual working day. Please list 3–4 principal tasks that you are going to accomplish today:

______

______

Method B: Interviews Tips on how to do a good interview  Structure the interview (this is useful for a few reasons including logical sequencing and consistency over a large number of respondents).  Prepare thoroughly beforehand – knowing the content of your questions and their purpose will help you to stay on track even if a respondent deviates.  Make a definite appointment – even for a telephone interview.  Complete a rough draft of the interview – check back with a respondent to verify your interpretation.  Be aware of your biases and mind-set – these may skew your interpretation.  Think twice in selecting the respondents you need – they should be experts with various backgrounds: PA professionals, decision makers, representatives of local communities, universities, environmental NGOs etc. If you expect to hear opposite opinions from two respondents, interview them both.  Appoint a staff member to transcribe the full texts of the interviews and to make an initial analysis for you. Ask him/her to present the results of the analysis in graphic form.

Method C: Group discussions/focus groups Tips on how to do a good interview  You need a professional moderator to maximize on the value of the group discussion.  Your training courses are a generally underestimated opportunity to get to know your audience better. Use training time to conduct discussions and brain-storming sessions on future training needs of your trainees. You can start a tradition of leaving a couple of hours at the end of each course for planning future seminars together. Besides giving you ideas and a needs assessment, your participants will likely become the main marketing tool for you as they will advertise your future initiatives when back at their PA.  Plan the line-up of the group very carefully and try to make it as diverse as you can.  Think beforehand on how you are going to interpret the results of a focus group: write down a plan of questions you wish to be discussed and try to keep close to it.

Scheme of a Complex TNA Launching a new training initiative, the combination of questionnaires, interviews and focus groups is the best option to receive maximum information about the situation with the target audiences. Special staff member form the organization leading the TNA will coordinate all the surveys, analyze the information and present the generalized results.

55 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Example of Training Packages 1. PA management 2. Institutional setting and management plans a. Strategic planning and operational management of a. Management planning and business planning a PA b. Institutional setting/arrangements b. HR and motivation for a PA c. Financial management c. Social marketing d. Legal aspects of PA system management d. Conflict management e. Monitoring and evaluation of PA management e. Private sector and the PA effectiveness f. PA and governmental structures – ways of interaction g. Cooperation with NGO sector h. PA and local communities i. Work with cultural and religious leaders j. Participatory management k. PA management in the face of global changes 3. Conservation finance mechanisms for protected areas 4. Environmental education and public awareness a. Environmental funds a. How to organize a public awareness campaign b. Payment for bio-rights b. How to organize environmental education c. Fees and royalties campaigns in schools d. Valuing ecosystem goods and services c. How to prepare good awareness-raising material e. Payment for environmental services (PES) d. How best to market a PA f. Kyoto Protocol CDM and Joint Implementation ( e. How to work with mass media JI) projects (carbon offset) f. Visitor centres and nature museums g. Fiscal instruments g. Work with visitors at eco-trails h. Fundraising for PAs h. Groups of Friends of PA and how to organize their work i. Volunteering for a PA 5. Eco-tourism development 6. Alternative livelihood programmes, relations with indigenous a. Basic principles of the organization of a tourist populations and community conservation areas industry, types of tourists a. Evaluating PA impact on regional socio-economic b. Specificity of ecological tourism development c. Visitor planning and management b. Alternative livelihood programmes at a PA: d. d) Limits of acceptable change: different methodology, best practices approaches to calculation c. Integrating local communities into ecotourism e. Legal framework of eco-tourism development in a development at a PA PA d. Developing micro-credit funds and PA-based f. How to develop a tour microcredit programmes for local communities g. How to create and certificate ecological paths in a e. Restoring traditional cultural and ethnographical PA tourism h. Tourism infrastructure development f. Creation of Public Councils and other co- i. Monitoring of the impact of recreational activity management structures on a PA g. Indigenous and community conserved areas j. Marketing and development of the ecotourism product k. Interaction between a PA and tourist companies 7. Ecological monitoring and research 8. Training for rangers a. Innovative methods of data accumulation and a. Legislation and law enforcement processing (GIS etc.) b. Prevention and documentation of law violations b. Ecological monitoring and data interpretation (protocols etc.) c. Complex research at a PA and interaction with c. Work with poachers scientific organizations d. Fire prevention and bio-technical activities d. Application of scientific data in PA management e. Environmental interpretation in the work of practice rangers f. Evaluating the effectiveness of the PA ranger service. 9. PA accounting and finance 10. Cultural heritage management a. Accounting systems a. Cooperation with cultural institutions in studying, b. Financial reporting to international and national inventory and conservation of cultural heritage donors b. Inventory and conservation of museum holdings c. Documentation of the commercial activities of a c. Organization of exhibitions PA d. Public awareness of the cultural value of PAs d. Fiscal policy as it applies to PAs e. Management of sites with special international

56 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

e. Financial management and economics status (UNESCO WH Sites, European Diploma etc.) f. Co-management of areas of traditional nature use with local communities. Community conservation areas and traditional land-use zones within and outside PA. g. Sacred sites and religious values within PAs

Target Groups  Senior PA officials, including superintendents;  Middle and low-level PA staff;  PA policy makers, including staff of PA agencies;  Environmental authorities;  Other decision makers;  Staff of environmental NGOs;  Teachers and schoolchildren;  Young conservationists;  Undergraduates;  Graduate and postgraduate students;  Conservation scientists;  Local community members and others.

References Kopylova, S.L. and Danilina, N.R. (Editors) (2011). Protected Area Staff Training: Guidelines for Planning and Management. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN. xiv + 102 pp.

57 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 8: MINUTES OF THE INCEPTION WORKSHOP

Inception Workshop Report

Proceedings & Outcomes of the

Inception Workshop for the project: Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan

Gilgit

16th May, 2018

A project for mountain protected areas of Central Karakoram National Park and Deosai National Park

58 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

List of abbreviations

CKNP - Central Karakoram National Park

CO - Community Organization

DNP - Deosai National Park

EPA - Environmental Protection Agency

IMARC – Integrated Mountain Area Research Centre

KIU - Karakoram International University

1. Introduction and Background Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan is a nineteen months project being executed by UNDP and being implemented by Ev-K2-CNR and WWF with financial support of Italian Cooperation. The geographic area of the project interventions are CKNP and DNP that are situated in Karakoram and Himalaya mountain ranges which are rich in biodiversity and water resources therefore deserve to be protected from existing and potential threats, both human-induced and natural. Effective approach in protecting and preserving ecosystems is through a network of protected areas. CKNP has been the focus of the Pakistan-Italy Debt for Development Swap Agreement (PIDSA) - Socio-Economic and Environmental Development (SEED) Programme, implemented by the Italian Association Ev-K2-CNR and KIU. After five years of research and field investigations, a management plan was developed, which was converted into an operational plan. Subsequently, both documents received official approval from the Gilgit Baltistan (GB) Government in 2015.

However, there is a further need to consolidate the operations of the CKNP, incorporating strategies to cope with emerging challenges such as growing pressures on natural resources by local communities and increasing climate variability. Findings and experiences from CKNP would be used as a model for other protected areas in Pakistan and elsewhere, particularly the Deosai National Park (DNP) with varying geo-physical properties, natural resources and pressures. Through the proposed project, the main aim is to promote the governance of mountain ecosystem in northern Pakistan by improving ecological services, and developing an effective response to climate change. Specifically the project will focus on consolidating CKNP’s management system, extending it to DNP, delineating a corridor that connects the two sites, and adding priority sites adjacent to DNP that are ecologically important but have not been part of management planning or officially recognized.

All of this further will necessitate the strengthening of capacity in both custodian government departments and local communities, to be part of solutions to emerging challenges and implement effective strategies to cope with climate change.

The project shall provide online platforms for sharing lessons, knowledge and experience among Protected Areas managers both within and outside Pakistan.

59 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

1.1. Planned Objectives of the Inception Workshop a. Kicking - off and launching of the project: Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park Management System as Model for Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan b. Knowing more about project framework and participatory planning c. Enhancing networking and exchange between different partners/ stakeholders and getting to know each other better.

1.2. Design & Methodology The workshop design combined conceptual introductions with brainstorming in plenary sessions as well as working in subgroups on well-defined tasks. The Participants took active roles in presenting pre-prepared conceptual and informational presentations as well as the outputs from the working groups.

1.3. Participants The participants represented partners and stakeholders from the target area; including: 1. Representatives from Cos 2. Gilgit Local Government 3. Department of Forest, Wildlife and Environment 4. EPA 5. Civil Society 6. CKNP representatives 7. DNP representatives 8. UNDP 9. Ev-K2-CNR 10. WWF

60 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

1.4. Workshop Agenda The workshop was conducted on May 16th, 2018 in Gilgit and the programme started at 10:00 a.m. and ended around 3:30 p.m. The detailed agenda is included in this document as Annex. The language of the workshop was for active communication and interaction. 2. Proceedings: Presentations, Discussions & Deliberations The workshop started with the recitation of Holy Quran, and then Mr. Usman Manzoor- Program Officer UNDP has said the welcome remarks.

Honorable guest Mr. Wilayat Noor (Chief Conservator) discussed the CKNP and DNP establishment and role of NGO’s in CKNP management plan and he particularly acknowledged SEED project and offered his all possible support for the project. The chief guest Mr. Usman (Commissioner Gilgit Division) in his speech said that the “main asset of GB is its ecosystem. It is important to save ecosystem for future generation. Now, GB is a tourist spot, last year 1.6 million tourist visited GB. The climate change is affecting GB, in Ghizer due to less snowfall there is scarcity of water in agricultural fields. We need local and international NGO’s with the collaboration of Government to do more for the GB development and to build its capacity for the benefit of the communities. Inception workshop is just beginning, we wish you to run project successfully, and we will provide help in all manners. Due to this project not only ecosystem and tourism but all communities include in project area will get benefits. GB ecosystem is important not only for GB but it also necessary for all Pakistan in many ways for development. I think organizations have to arrange awareness programs for colleges and schools to raise importance of ecosystem”. Summary of presentations: Three presentations were delivered, one each by UNDP, Ev-K2-CNR and WWF, covering key topics including Project Overview, Governance, Knowledge Management and Livelihood.

2.1. 1st Presentation by NPM Sahibzada Irfanullah Khan Mr. Irfan paid his gratitude towards Government and people of GB for their support regarding the project and he further highlighted the important mountain ecosystem of GB and shared an over view of the project.

61 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

“GB represents unique ecosystem, not only for economy of GB but also for the whole country. Water source of Pakistan depend on glaciers and any change affects water supply. We are facing threats due to human and natural activities. Ev-K2-CNR (SEED project), KIU and other departments developed CKNP management plan/Operational Plan. The approved management plan of CKNP and DNP need to be revised to improve management and revised MPs/OPs will work as a model for world and Pakistan. The main objective of this project is to improve the governance mechanism of CKNP and DNP. The expected results of the project are: Improve governance (identify site for ecological corridors between CKNP and DNP) Increase knowledge (capacity building activities, awareness rising programs) Improve livelihoods (assessment study of communities for interventions; water plant, pastures, fuel, livestock extensions, ecotourism, solar system and plantation activities) How project will fulfill agenda 2030 targets? Biodiversity and 2030 agenda: 1. Poverty level 2. Zero hunger 3. Agro biodiversity 4. Watershed 5. Health system 6. Gender equality 7. Clear water and sanitation 8. Sustainable cities and communities 9. Response to consumption and production factors 10. Climate action (especially nature ecosystem) 11. Life on land”

2.2. 2nd Presentation by M. Aurangzaib – Ev-K2-CNR

62 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

2.3. 3rd presentation by Mr. Saeed – WWF The presentation was focused on climate change and its potential impacts. In the presentation he stated that “26% population of GB living in poverty, having daily income less than $1, Malnutrition: 49% in GB • Main livelihood options- agro practices, small scale fishery • No institution for range land • In 21 century climate change is the biggest challenge According to IPCC reports intensity and frequency impart; annual mean temperature graph shows 1°c change in temperature, increase rainfall and season shifting. Weather data from Skardu and Gilgit shows that temperature and rainfall high in spring.

63 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

WWF conducted 25-20 year’s study that shows decrease in glaciers 1 to 1.5km, rivers and streams frozen in past not yet, decrease in soil quantity and quality. Status of species changing Change in vegetation- natural forest depleted WWF role: • Water resilient–solar water lifting pumps and micro irrigation • Energy smart intervention- solar drying heaters and home insulation • Smart crops • Science based action needed to conserve MPA’s and improve maintenance system”

2.4. Question & Answer session Q1. Is there any committee at federal level or GB level for administrative support? From Shehzad Shigri- Director EPA GB Q2: Is there any tool for benchmark? How capacity building change people lives? What are the outcomes of this project? 3. Pro. Dr. Mauzam Nizami from KIU and Director IMARC suggested use DSM model available data for future and management plan.

4. Raja Abid Ali – Director CKNP suggested add local members in project advisory group, and he also shared that for CKNP a management committee already exists. 5. Mr. M. Akram DFO and in-charge DNP suggested develop management plans up to village or valley level. 6. Mr. Zafar, a community representative from Raheemabad (a village in the buffer zone of CKNP) commented that though government and NGOs are working to tackle illegal wildlife hunting and forest cutting but yet no visible results 7. Mr. Yasir Abbas- Ecologist from CKNP suggested inclusion of more livelihood related activities to fulfill community needs. 8. A CO from Haramosh valley of CKNP suggested that like VCCs, WCSDO is also working on both conservation and development, so they should be also considered in implementation. 9. Mr. Mayoor Khan- Country Representative of WCS offered their all support and requested to UNDP to initiate such interventions in Diamir region as well. 10. Unnamed CO member suggested strengthening the communities through building their capacities. 11. Shahadat Noor from of CKNP suggested involving local community representatives in advisory group to fulfill their needs. 12. M. Alam Assistant Chief GB P&D suggested inclusion of field activities and cultural diversity in this project. 12. Wazir Ejaz- CEO BCDF suggested traditional building construction in CKNP. 13. Mansoor Hameed suggested promote tourism in GB and involve community in this project.

2.5. Brainstorming session Three groups were formed to discuss issues and suggest possible solutions for Eco tourism, Governance and Livelihood options.

a. Outputs from the group on Eco- Tourism Issues Possible Solutions Increased Tourist Influx Better coordination for resource availability Deforestation Alternate energy, plantations

64 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Human waste Provision of ecofriendly toilets at touristic sites Current construction trends Switching to more sustainable practices Heritage loss Restoration of heritage sites Waste Management Installation of signage, awareness raising and provision of dustbins Plastic use Discourage use of plastics and promote biodegradable products Unexplored treks Development of new treks, their maps and itineraries Lack of accommodation Promote community based tourism, guest houses, camping sites Degraded pastures Pastures can be good touristic sites, promote good pasture management, restore shepherd huts for tourists Hidden touristic sites Marketing, branding Shortage of food and fuel during tourism Federal government should help season Low level of socio economic conditions Promote enterprise development, local products, value addition and of communities trainings Bad behavior of locals and tourists Sensitization and awareness for both tourists and local people Sustainability of touristic sites Entry fee mechanism No entry point/office of CKNP in Construct one in Gilgit region Gilgit region Ecofriendly accommodation at DNP Promote fiber and wood for huts in Deosai Lack of coordination with all Access all communities around DNP communities

b. Outputs from the group on governance Issues Possible Solutions Huge area and limited resources Increase financial and human resources (financial and human) Increase capacity building of Improve capacity of stakeholders (Govt. NGO and communities stakeholders (Govt. department, through trainings, seminars, visits etc.) CBO and pastures) Conflict due to DNP boundaries Resolve issue through consultations with communities by formulation a joint council of both communities under district administration Community use rights Coverage/ shelter to customary laws under the Govt. rules and issue/ownership/ customary regulations

65 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

laws/institutional laws Lack of coordination among Strengthen the coordination and linkages among partners through stakeholder and relevant departments agreements/MoUs Lack of funds and its utilization, Enhance finance and transparency/ monitoring mechanism accountability and monitoring Degradation of wildlife habitat/ Improve wildlife habitats through social forestry deforestation Sustainability of staff/ employees and Improve staff strength and sustainability/ interventions activities

c. Outputs from the group on Livelihood Resources Issues Problem Solutions Agriculture Traditional agricultural practices, lack of Introduce new agriculture practices, awareness, lack of research, market access, establish research center, cold storage, no good quality seeds, storage certified seeds and nurseries Fruits Diseases, use of chemicals, storage, Natural pest management, establish transportation, processing units, certified certified nurseries, build chemicals nurseries, uniform and commercial orchards manufacturing factory linkages Livestock Less grazing opportunities in pastures, Alternate grazing opportunities, insurance, vaccination, shepherd huts, secondary products, insurance, veterinary clinics construct shepherd huts Forest/wildlife Illegal hunting and deforestation Social forestry, prevent illegal cutting, involve local community, game watcher, alternate energy solutions Pasture Lack of awareness and research Develop grazing guidelines, water availability, involve local people Mountains and glaciers No boundary demarcation, solid and human Boundary demarcation, waste waste, flood due to glaciers melting management, social forestry, flood warning system Minerals No proper mining practices, market, Establish training centers, involve restrictions and no involvement of local local people, develop law enforcement people, lack of awareness, exploration Water/ barren land Management issues Develop barren lands, construct dams and establish power houses Human resources Management issues Develop law enforcement

66 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

ANNEXES OF THE MEETING MINUTES Annex 1: Workshop Agenda

INCEPTION WORKSHOP “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model of Mountain Ecosystems in Northern Pakistan”

May 16, 2018

Serena Hotel, Gilgit

Time Description Presented by

10:00 am Welcome address Programme Officer, UNDP Pakistan

Secretary P&D / Secretary Forest, Wildlife 10:10 am Opening remarks & Environment, Govt of GB Introduction to the CKNP Project and its National Project Manager CKNP, UNDP 10:25 am objectives Pakistan Conservation, management and capacity 10:40 am EvK2CNR Representative building activities Impacts of climate change on biodiversity and 11:10 am WWF Representative coping strategies

11:40 am Tea break

Group work with local communities 12:00 pm Participants (suggestions/recommendations)

01:30 pm Lunch & Prayer break

02:30 pm Presentation of group work Group leaders

Secretary P&D, Government of Gilgit 03:00 pm Concluding Remarks Baltistan

03:15 pm Vote of thanks Country Director/ACD, UNDP Pakistan

67 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Annex 2: Attendance Sheet

68 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

69 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

70 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

71 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

DELIVERABLE 9: PRELIMINARY SURVEY FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF DEOSAI NATIONAL PARK – CENTRAL KARAKORUM NATIONAL PARK ECOLOGICAL CORRIDOR BOUNDARIES

► Introduction In the ’70 of the last century the concept of conservation biology was developed, and this new interdisciplinary approach start to link together social sciences with the nature management (Soulè and Wilcox, 1980). From this new point of view it was clear that for the conservation of the biodiversity and natural resources on long term, the protected areas were not sufficient (Noss, 1991a). With the bio-region approach (McNeely, 1992) the aim was to avoid habitat loss and territorial fragmentation, one of the most threats for the biodiversity (Wilcove et al.,1986; Noss, 1991b), through the creation and conservation of biological corridors: natural areas (natural or agricultural ecosystems) able to connect the different Protected Areas maintaining the necessary flow of individuals and genes between the populations (i.e. Soulé, 1987; Noss, 1993). The importance of this new approach is growing up during the time also considering the potential impact of climate change on ecosystem and species, especially those located in mountain areas that, for their specialized adaptation to the extreme conditions, are more sensitive to this phenomena.

► Deosai NP – Central Karakorum NP Connectivity Delineation – Methodology & Work Plan ▪ Overview approach The aim of our proposal is the delineation of a possible connection area between DPN and CKNP, composed by a net of passages linking together the most natural zones (meaning the less modified by human activities). Each passage could be different in size and structure, but it will be in line with the minimum requirements laid down by the program. The creation of this connection area is a complex and time-consuming process considering the heterogeneity and the complexity of the matrix (public/private land and infrastructures, different degree of naturalness, presence of large number of stakeholders … ); so in the time span of this call it will be possible to delineate the knots, also suggesting new areas that need the development conservation measures, and possible passages forming the net and the related strength and weakness points. The development of this connection area - linking the DNP plateau with the jointed CKNP and Khunjerab NP is focused to maintain and support biodiversity and ecosystem services on a long term perspective. This approach will provide a direct support to long term biodiversity safeguard particularly: - reducing habitat fragmentation - assuring the species migration and dispersal, and related genetic flow able to reduce the inbreeding and support the population recovery and ecosystem process - facing the climate change impact, thanks to the possibility for species to shift their distribution but will also assure economic, social and ecological benefits for human communities, regarding: - livelihood security, considering that most of the communities is strictly depending by renewable natural resources for direct use - benefit assured by the ecosystem services product by the natural area, as: drinking water, carbon sequestration, crop pollination for agriculture ….. - nature-based tourism industry

72 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

▪ Activities The activities will be conducted using a multidisciplinary approach considering the following aspects: a. define first for which “target species” conservation the corridors will be delineated; this will be delineated trough meeting with park and government authorities. b. species-specific habitat requirements: considering both the “flag species”, larger or migrating species moving through the corridor, and the “corridor dwellers”, usually small species that can use full or part of the passage as home range (Beier and Loe, 1992). To consider both type of users, it usually recognized to use large mammals as key species (e.g. brown bear) that, requiring wide areas, work as “umbrella species”. c. connectivity models: based on the degree of human modification on habitat matrix. d. consultation with local stakeholders, communities and park management authorities.

The work activities, summarized below, will follow a logical framework (work plan), which foreseen deliverable are reported in the following table: 1. Definition of the planning team 2. Related to the potential corridor area between CKNP and DNP, collection of: - data on environmental situation and natural resource use - satellite images and land use maps - laws and customary rules - town, cultivated land and infrastructure presence and planning 3. Delineation of “flag species” as key to develop the corridor. Usually a large mammal is considered (e.g. brown bear) to assure the ecological permeability to the other smaller species. 4. Identification of the potential stepping stone and sinks areas, with related field surveys. For sink knots contact with institutional bodies and stakeholders involved will be conducted. 5. Delineation of the potential corridor with a Strengths/Weaknesses analysis for the different knots. 6. Consultation and sharing of the corridor proposal with institutional bodies (Government Dep.…) and stakeholders (local communities, associations ….).

▪ Work Plan 2018 2019 (INCEPTION PHASE) (MAIN PHASE) DELIVERABLES J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N D Preliminary survey for identification of ecological corridor boundaries Consultation meetings with park and government authorities Communities consultative process for CKNP, DNP and the corridor Identification of ecological boundary points and development of initial concept for the corridor Field surveys for data collection Ecological corridor map Management guidelines for the ecological corridor

73 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

► DNP – CKNP Connectivity Corridor– preliminary survey on potential sites of ecological interest for its delineation. During the consultation meeting with main stakeholders and Park authorities held on May-June 2018, some key points that could have an ecological interest for the delineation of the corridor have been proposed, and are described below. A preliminary analysis comparing the proposed key points with the needs of corridor’s delineation will be realized both using preliminary GIS and satellite images, as well as the organization of specific field campaigns for environmental data collection. The proposed ecological corridor will be then shared with stakeholders, Park authorities and Local Communities to complete the consultation process.

Site 1: The pictures are taken from Gol village and across the river is Nar Goro village of CKNP. Recently in the vicinity of Gol village a brown has been sighted by the community and it is assumed that the bear came from DNP and Gol itself lies in the Himalayas and on the other side is Nar Goro which is famous for Urial.

Site 2: Katchura is another alternate route for Deosai National Park and a can be a potential site for the ecological corridor.

Site 3: Basho Valley. Basho village can lies in Himalayas across the River Indus and can be one of the potential site for ecological corridor.

74 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Site 4: Baghicha village in CKNP could be another potential site for ecological corridor.

▪ Preliminary discussion on the location of potential sites of ecological interest for the delineation of the corridor Further to the above mentioned proposal, a preliminary map has been prepared in order to show the location of those sites respect to CKNP and DNP boundaries. The following maps have to be considered as a first working tool to initiate the discussion on the potential location of the corridor, in order to properly plan future field campaigns to collect needed data and information for corridor mapping.

Map 1 provides a complete overview of the two parks and of the area (green and yellow lines) which includes the potential sites proposed during the consultation meetings for corridor location.

Map 1 (Source, Ev-K2-CNR)

Map 2 focuses on potential corridor location. The area between green and yellow lines and corresponding to the location of the sites proposed during the recent consultation meetings, even in this preliminary overview, is showing some criticisms, and particularly: (i) its total surface is too big to be managed, considering Parks surface; (ii) Indus river is crossing the site, thus making difficult or impossible the transit of flag species from one park to the other.

75 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Further to this consideration, additional potential site(s) for corridor location have been shown, and this area is marked with the red lines. All those preliminary hypothesis have now to be analyzed and discussed, first of all through the review of existing information and a more detailed remote sensing analysis, and then through the mapping of the most suitable area to delineate corridor boundaries.

Map 2 (Source, Ev-K2-CNR)

► References

Beier, P. and S. Loe, 1992. A checklist for evaluating impacts to wildlife movement corridors. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:434 - 440.

McNeely, J.A., 1992. IUCN new programme for parks and protected areas. Environmental Policy and Law, 22(3):138- 143.

Noss R.F., 1991a. Thinking big in restoration ecology. Environmental Professional 13:225-234.

Noss R.F., 1991b. Protecting Habitats and Biological Diversity. Part I: Guidelines for Regional Reserve System. National Audubon Society, New York.

Noss R.F., 1993. Wildlife corridors. In: D.S. Smith e P.A. Hellmund, eds. Ecology of Greenways. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.

Soulé, M. E., B. A. Wilcox, 1980. Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates.

Soulé M.E., 1987. Viable population for conservation. Ed. M. Soulé. Cambridge University Press.

Wilcove, D.S., McIellan, C.H. and A.P. Dobson,1986. Habitat fragmentation in the temperate zone. In: Soulè, M.E. (ed) Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. 237-256.

76 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

ANNEX I: SIGNED MOUs WITH CONCERNED AUTHORITIES

77 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

78 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

79 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

80

Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

81 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

82 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

83 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

84 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

85 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

86 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

ANNEX II: MINUTES OF THE 1ST CONSULTATION SESSION WITH PROJECT STAKEHOLDERS

Meeting with CKNP Director Skardu, 31st May, 2018 CKNP Directorate, Skardu Ev-K2-CBR Pakistan Office organized a meeting with CKNP Directorate Officials on Thursday, May 31, 2018 at the office of CKNP Directorate, Skardu. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. Then a brief follow up meeting was arranged on 4th June, 2018 after meeting with community of Thalay Valley in CKNP buffer zone. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

CKNP 1. Mr. Raja Abid Ali, Director Central Karakoram National Park, Gilgit Baltistan 2. Mr. Yasir Abbas, Ecologist Central Karakoram National Park, Gilgit Baltistan 3. Mr. Rashid Minhas, Admin and Finance officer, Central Karakoram National Park, Gilgit Baltistan

Ev-K2-CNR 4. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 5. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 6. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 7. Muhammad Raza, Social Organizer, Ev-K2-CNR 8. Muhammad Ismail, Ev-K2-CNR

87 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Meeting with CKNP officials on 31st may, 2018

Presentation and Discussion Mr. Aurangzaib, NRM consultant presented a detailed introduction of the project, particularly the activities assigned to Ev-K2-CNR. Later on Mr. Arif Hussain, Social Mobilization Consultant presented the consultative process with stakeholders specifically with the various communities of CKNP. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator acknowledged the support of CKNP directorate in previous projects implemented in CKNP and urged the same for this project. Mr. Abid Ali, Director CKNP assured all possible support to this project and also enquired about any direct funding to CKNP. According to him CKNP is passing through a difficult phase as they don’t have even resources to carry out some important field surveys, visits and community meetings. The director also expressed his disappointment about the short duration of the project. Mr. Yasir Abbas, Ecologist CKNP, He also expressed his concerns about the activities going to be implemented by the project implementing partners including Ev-K2-CNR and WWF. Ecologist commented that there are a lot of activities on planning like pasture management plans, water safety plans etc. He suggested having more tangible activities as all such plans have already been developed in previous SEED Project otherwise it will be very difficult for CKNP, UNDP and Ev-K2-CNR to work with the communities. CKNP director and ecologist suggested including livestock insurance scheme against snow leopard and predation, predator proof corrals and wildlife watch towers. CKNP management further added that 6 to 7 watch towers are needed in various CKNP valleys to improve watch and ward mechanism and CKNP can help preparing the designs for such watch towers. Ecologist also asked to share the livelihood activities so that the CKNP directorate could align them according to the actual need of Park and its community. Recently 14 individuals of Ladakh Urials and one Brown Bear have been sighted in Biafo area of CKNP, the director asked more support to carry out in depth field surveys for Ungulates (Urial), Brown Bear, Herpetofauna and Migratory Birds. Snow leopard has been reported by the community in Manthoka area that can be another potential site for corridor but CKNP has no financial and technical capacity to confirm such news. The directorate needs equipment and gadgets like camera traps and radio collaring. Commenting on the Management Planning of CKNP, CKNP director suggested arranging District Conservation Committee Meetings (DCC). CKNP could not arrange such meetings because of financial constraints and it involves financial expense including refreshments and travel. The PC 1 phase II for management plan implementation of CKNP is just covering their salaries, the Director said.

88 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Director told that climate change has now become a real threat for the inhabitants of mountainous region like Gilgit Baltistan. This year agriculture fields are receiving very less water from Nallahs because of late melting of snow and ice. Director also said that other project specifically Economic Transformation Initiative (ETI/IFAD) project is not in coordination with CKNP directorate though they are implementing various activities in the buffer zone of CKNP.

Attendance Sheet

89 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Meeting with Conservator Forest, Baltistan Skardu, 01stJune, 2018 Conservator Forest Office, Skardu

Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Office organized one meeting with Conservator Forest Baltistan on Friday, 01st June, 2018 at the office of Conservator Forest Baltistan in Skardu. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

Conservator Forest 1. Dr. Zakir Hussain

Ev-K2-CNR 2. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

Discussion Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, the Project Coordinator briefed Conservator Forest Baltistan about the Mountain Protected Area Project of UNDP and Ev-K2-CNR as an implementing partner for the management planning of CKNP and DNP and identification and mapping of an ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP. Conservator forest assured its support for the management planning of CKNP and DNP. Conservator was of the view that there are very high hopes from CKNP Directorate but the directorate lakes coordination with line departments and the community. Conservator said there is less trophy hunting in CKNP and the region needs more promotion in this regard. Conservator also expressed his displeasure that the buffer zone community is not getting any benefits of the protected areas and there should be more Community Controlled Hunting Areas (CCHA). The conservator informed the participants about new draft of forest and wildlife acts and hopefully will be effective in July 2018. He emphasized to consult those two acts in management planning of CKNP and DNP as these documents are drafted keeping in view the future need of next 30 to 40 years. The draft acts have already been endorsed by GB assembly and cabinet and need to be approved by GB council now. The conservator appreciated the efforts regarding ecological corridor. He pointed out that even the connectivity with in protected areas is not so good and needs to be improved.

90 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Meeting with WLMO/DFO, Deosai National Park (DNP)/Baltistan Skardu, 01stJune, 2018 Deosai National Park Office, Skardu

Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Office organized one meeting with Wildlife Management Officer/DFO Deosai National Park and Baltistan region on Friday, 01st June, 2018 at the office of Deosai National Park in Skardu. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

WLMO/DFO 1. Mr. Muhammad Akram – WLMO/DFO

Ev-K2-CNR 2. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

Discussion Mr. Arif Hussain consultant social mobilization briefed the WLMO/DFO Deosai National Park about the Mountain Protected Area Project, its goals, objectives, planned interventions and the tasks assigned to Ev-K2- CNR. WLMO/DFO shared the challenges being faced by Deosai National Park office in terms of financial and human resource. The total number of DNP staff is 30 and majority of them are on contractual basis, even the range forest officer (RFO) is also on the contract and his contract is going to be expired in coming months. WLMO/DFO requested direct funds to DNP office and support for human resources. The foremost concern shared by WLMO/DFO DNP is the community conflicts (Skardu and Astore Districts) on the park boundaries. WLMO further suggested to form a group of notables from both sides and to arrange face to face meetings. Mr. Riaz Project Coordinator offered Ev-K2-CNR’s full support regarding this matter. WLMO/DFO DNP informed the participants that Satpara Valley, one of the main buffer zone valleys of DNP is facing threats of soil erosion and silting. According to him, soil erosion and flash floods created havoc for the inhabitants of Satpara valley and asked some soil conservation initiatives for the communities. Mr. Aurangzaib NRM consultant commented that EV-K2-CNR is only assigned to work on management planning of Deosai

91 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

National Park and there are only soft components but he assured to convey the concerns to UNDP and Gilgit Baltistan Disaster Risk Management Authority. While discussing the current and future challenges, WLMO/DFO- DNP shared the issue of Shatung Nallah diversion towards to fulfill the requirement of hydro power and drinking water. But due to potential threats to the population of Satpara valley and negative environmental impacts, the DNP office is not in favour of this proposal.

According to WLMO/DFO there are 11 valleys in DNP but Chilam and Satpara are the main valleys as they are only entry points by road from Districts of Astore and Skardu. WLMO/DFO praised the waste management interventions of Ev-K2-CNR in Baltoro Region of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) and requested to have such interventions in Deosai National Park. The high plateau of Deosai National Park is one of the top tourist destinations in Gilgit Baltistan. Last year in 2017, approximately 29000 people visited and some set camps in Deosai National Park. Due to the construction of Gilgit Skardu road, the pressure of travellers will further increase in Deosai as the National Park is the alternate route to access Skardu, Astore and Gilgit. Ev-K2-CNR Project Coordinator again commented that they have only soft components of the project; such interventions are not in the current scope of the organization. WLMO/ DFO further added that DNP office held a meeting with tour operators on the issue of waste management and tour operators were told either they have to bring all their waste back or they have to pay additional charges for that. WLMO/DFO praised the efforts of DNP staff that despite of the very limited resources both in financial and human, the park achieved excellent conservation results. According to some recent wildlife survey in DNP, the total population of Brown Bear is 76. Deosai National Park discourages the commercial herders to bringing their livestock to Deosai Plateau. WLMO/DFO informed the participants that Wildlife Management Board of Gilgit Baltistan decided to allow only 6 old families to graze their animals in the park.

92 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Consultative session with CKNP, DNP and Communities Skardu, 04th June, 2018 Deosai National Park (DNP) Office, Skardu

A second round of meeting was organized by Ev-K2-CNR with DNP officials, CKNP Directorate and Satpara community representatives at DNP office in Skardu on Monday, 04th June, 2018. The agenda of the meeting was to discuss the possible ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP and identification of sites under the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan”.

Participants The following participants attended the meeting: 1. Mr. Muhammad Akram, WLMO/DFO DNP and Baltistan 2. Mr. Raja Abid Ali, Director CKNP 3. Mr. Yasir Abbas, Ecologist CKNP 4. Mr. Rashid Minhas, Finance & Admin officer, CKNP 5. Mr. Mehdi, Community Representative of Satpara 6. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 7. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 8. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 9. Mr. Muhammad Raza, Social organizer Ev-k2-CNR Pakistan

Discussion and Presentation Ev-K2-CNR project coordinator presented the idea of the ecological corridor and its potential benefits to the flora and fauna of the two protected areas. Consultant NRM emphasized the importance of an ecological corridor; as such intervention is going to be tested very first time in the country. The ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP can promote biological conservation because it may contribute to habitat connectivity for a range of individual species. Ev-K2-CNR will strive to identify the potential sites and map the corridor. The participants appreciated the planned intervention of an ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP and its potential benefits for long term conservation of biodiversity and natural resources of CKNP and DNP.

93 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Mr. Mehdi from Satpara valley said that his valley can be one of the potential sites for the corridor. Wildlife has been seen along the stream coming from DNP and passing through Satpara valley to the Indus River. Director CKNP asked from Ev-K2-CNR about the affiliated possible interventions in the project for the community of the potential ecological corridor. Consultant NRM responded that though Ev-K2- CNR has only soft component that includes consultations, field visits, identification, mapping and management guideline preparation for the ecological corridor but it can be communicated to executing agency (UNDP) and implementing partner (WWF). WLMO/DFO DNP asked to include Basho valley as one of the potential site for the ecological corridor. He further added that the valley has the access to DNP and across the river to CKNP as well, the valley is covered by natural forest of diverse species, wildlife and pastures. He said that the project can have the potential to market such sites with good eco-tourism potential. CKNP officials appreciated the idea of ecological corridor and commented to focus Brown Bear, Markhore and Urial as flagship species for the corridor. Ecologist suggested considering Baghicha village, Basho valley, Kachura, Satpara, Sermik, Gol, Hussainabad, Thole village and Humayun Bridge area as potential sites for the corridor. Recently 4 -5 Markhore individuals have been sites in Baghicha Area and it is being assumed that they came from Himalayan side to CKNP as they the DNP buffer zone is not so far.

Pictorial View of potential sites for Ecological Corridor After the meeting with the stakeholders, Ev-K2-CNR team visited the potential sites for the ecological corridor pointed out by CKNP and DNP officials.

Site1: The pictures are taken from Gol village and across the river is Nar Goro village of CKNP. Recently in the vicinity of Gol village a brown has been sighted by the community and it is assumed that the bear came from DNP and Gol itself lies in the Himalayas and on the other side is Nar Goro which is famous for Urial.

94 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Site 2: Katchura is another alternate route for Deosai National Park and a can be a potential site for the ecological corridor.

95 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Site3: Basho Valley Basho village can lies in Himalayas across the River Indus and can be one of the potential site for ecological corridor.

Site4. Baghicha village in CKNP could be another potential site for ecological corridor

96 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Meeting with Economic Transformation Initiative (ETI) Project Skardu, 31stMay, 2018 ETI Baltistan Office, Skardu

Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Office organized one meeting with Regional Program Manager of Economic Transformation Initiative (ETI) Project Baltistan by IFAD on Saturday, May 31st, 2018 at the office of ETI/IFAD Baltistan office in Skardu. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

ETI/IFAD 1. Mr. Barkat Ali, Regional Program Manager

Ev-K2-CNR 2. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

Discussion ETI project regional programe manager briefed Ev-K2-CNR delegation about the projecy and interventions. He informed that IFAD is carrying out activities in the Buffer Zone of CKNP including Hushe, Kandhe and Thaley valleys. The planned interventions of ETI are value chain component for potatoes and Apricots, land development and farm to market access. The district agriculture department is the main department/ partner with IFAD for above mentioned activities. Commenting on the environmental aspect of the project, the RPM informed that the project is going to prepare water policy for the whole GB and moreover social forestry interventions in the coming future. Though the project is carrying out activities in the buffer zone of CKNP, the water channels they are constructing (the source is the glacial melt from CKNP glaciers) but there is no interaction between the project and CKNP Directorate Ev-K2-CNR asked for more information, and maps , some reports, they asked to wrote one letter to PC of the project and get their approval first.

97 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Meeting with Satpara Community Skardu, 02nd June, 2018 Ev-K2-CNR Office, Skardu Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan Office organized one meeting with the SatparaValley, Buffer Zone Community of Deosai Nation National Park on Saturday,02nd June, 2018 at the office of Ev-K2-CNR in Skardu. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

Satpara Community 9. 6 community representatives ( list is annexed)

Ev-K2-CNR 10. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 11. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 12. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 13. Mr. Muhammad Raza , SO, Ev-K2-CNR, Pakistan 14. Mr. Muhammad Ismail, Office Incharge, Ev-K2-CNR, Pakistan

Discussion Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, briefed the community representatives of the Satpara valley about the Mountain Protected Area Project of UNDP and Ev-K2-CNR as an implementing partner for the management planning of CKNP and DNP and identification and mapping of an ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP. The community briefed the Ev-K2-CNR staff about the Satpara valley which is one of the most important buffer zone valleys of Deosai National Park, the valley 400 households and five villages; out of them three( Central Gaon or Skillgronh, Bara Gaon and Daari) have pasture use rights in Deosai National Park. Satpara valley falls in UC Shigri Khurd and one of the entrance routes to Deosai. Daari village is very important for the valley as the road to Deosai passes through it and the only micro hydal power unit lies here. Satapara valley as a whole and particularly Daari village is one of the most active Buffer Zone communities of Deosai National Park. They provide help and facilitation to tourists in case of any accident, disaster, provides first aid, clearing road from snow and landslides, usually they are the ones who reach first in case of any accident. Due to their location, the valley inhabitants are the victim of mass tourism as well. Tourists spread garbage and waste and enter into their fields in the season of fruit trees blossom and sometimes damage their crops.

98 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

The community told that the locals can take their livestock anywhere in the park except the core zone. Coomenting on the nomads the community informed that Gilgit Baltistan Wildlife Management Board only allows six old families of nomads to graze their animals in the park. Majority of nomads enter into the park from Chillam, District Astore. The forest department of District Astore also charges then with some grazing fee as well that is PKR 10 for and sheep and PKR 20 for horses and large ruminants. After the wildlife management board decision, DNP restricts the entry of nomads into the park. Allowed nomad families can graze their animals till Bara Pani and Mutaza top. The community shared the boundary conflict between them and the community of Chillam, District Astore. Administratively Bara Pani is considered as the frontier between Astore and Skardu Distrcits. The community of District Astore claims their territory till Ali Malik top and Skardu community claims till Daskharam. Mr. Mehdi, Coomunity Representative and Game Inspector of DNO suggested close and continuous coordination and face to face meetings between these two communities to solve the issue. There are total 11 valleys in the buffer zone of DNP and Satpara community demands more share from the revenue of DNP as compared to other valleys in District Skardu. They claim they provide services to park and tourists, provide rescue and first aid, manage waste and victim of tourists intrusion to their fields, even government did not any compensation aginst the 3000 kanal land that is now submerged in Satpara dam reservoir, so they should be given 80% of revenue that is collected from the entry fee tickets. According to them two valley of DNP (Satpara and Chillam) are the main community stakeholders and they have the right over the resources generated by the park. The entry fee structure is: $8/person for foreigners, PKR 100 for Pakistani nationals and PKR40 for the locals. In the history of DNP, it is the first time that even locals are being charged. The community urged to have predator proof corrals, jobs in DNP, share in tourism services in the form of tourist guides and for trekking services and community support to uplift the socio economic condition. Consultant NRM commented that assigned tasks to Ev-K2-CNR consists only consultations and field surveys, there is no hard component assigned to Ev-k2-CNR but their concerns will be communicated to DNP officials, concerned line departments and UNDP.

Ev-K2-CNR staff was told that there are five community based organizations for the sake of development and conservation in Satpara valley but all of them are nonfunctional. There is an informal group of notables or a Jirga which takes the decisions and have consultations within the community and with other organizations. On their behalf their representatives participate in the meetings and consultative sessions. Satapara community demands the maximum share (80%) of the entry fee but government (DNP) intends to provide some financial support to other buffer zone valleys as well (Skardu side) as the DNP is formed to protect mainly Himalayan Brown Bear and Bear can go to any valley. But Satpara community insists that other valleys should not be given any share from their share (80% what they claim) but government should give them from their share or they should be compensated in the form of job and employment or any other benefit.

99 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Community representative expressed their disappointment that majority of the projects implemented in DNP with the focus on research and conservation only, neglecting the development of the buffer zone community. Currently there is only one small project on education is ongoing. The community listed three main priorities as the custodians of DNP; a. Control Human Movement b. Restrict camping to specific sites c. Waste Management Mr. Mehdi informed that in a last meeting with tours operators, DNP officials told them either they should bring back their generated waste or pay additional charges. Incinerator installed by Ev-K2-CNR in CKNP is demanded by the community to safely dispose off the waste. The local travelers between Astore and Skardu spread more waste than the tourists. According to the community the whole Satpara valleys is facing extreme negative impacts of climate change and if there are no mitigation and adaptation measures are taken soon then there might be climate induced human migration due to flash floods and soil erosion . The community is adapting some practices like plantation but at very limited scale. They asked to be given priority in social forestry and climate change adaptation interventions of the project. Project Coordinator assured them that the issue will be communicated to UNDP and District Disaster Management Authority. The community informed that the water bodies of Deosai National Park are rich in various fish species and fishing was completely ban in DNP earlier. But from last two years on the aasetion of the local tourists/people the government is issuing fishing license for Bara Pani and Kala Pani (declared fishing zone) only @500/License (5 fish in one license). In 2017, 50 to 60 fishing license sold by DNP. The local tourists are more responsible for illegal fishing rather than the tourists from down country. Community participants shared that there is no customary practice against hunting and deforestation, hunting has been reduced due to strict rules by DNP and awareness but there is no restriction on hunting from customary laws. Mainly Ibex and Chakore were hunted, the Satapara valley was declared as game sanctuary but there is no Community Controlled Hunting Area (CCHA) and community requested for CCHA so that through trophy hunting initiatives which may bring change in conservation and socio economic development of the community. Commenting on the role of women, the community told that the role of women in community decisions and participation in community matters is negligible. There is no women organization in the community. During the discussion, Ev-K2-CNR representatives were informed that mainly nomads or Gujjars are involved in harvest of medicinal and aromatic plants from Deosai plains. The community and DNP officials are now restricting nomads in unattainable and excessive harvest of medicinal plants. The community further added that Astore community favours Gujjars and some even take financial benefits from them. The Satpara community also suggested to merge the grazing fee and park entry fee to be merged so that the community of Chillam doesn’t give any favour of grazing to Gujjars. According to them it will be acceptable to the community if they both the fee merged and given share of 80%. The community complained that neither they received any benefit from DNP nor from Satpara Dam. Even community sacrificed 3000 kanals for Satpara Dam Reservoir but without any compensation. The community asked there is dire need to control soil erosion, health and education facilities. Community shared that discussion is going on between DNP and WAPDA to divert Shatung Nallah from Deosai to Satpapara Dam if it happens they will be more erosion, more silt and more threats of flash flood to Satpara valley and more losses to human and livestock.

100 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Attendance Sheet

Meeting with Deputy Secretary Forest, Wildlife & Environment Gilgit, 05th June, 2018 Secretary Forest, Wildlife & Environment Office, Gilgit Meeting with Deputy Secretary Forest, Wildlife and Environment was held at his office in Gilgit on Tuesday, 05st June, 2018. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting: 1. Mr. Musa-Deputy Secretary (DS) Forest, Wildlife & Environment

Ev-K2-CNR 2. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

101 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Discussion Ev-K2-CNR Project Coordinator briefed the DS about the UNDP project and tasks assigned to Ev-k2-CNR. He further said that though the management plan and operational plan of CKNP were approved by government of Gilgit Baltistan in 2014 but there is further need to consolidate the operations to cope with new emerging challenges, pressure on natural resources and climate change. Experiences and lessons learned in CKNP will be used in the management and operation planning of Deosai National Park.

Deputy Secretary assured his departmental support for this project and appreciated the efforts of Ev-K2-CNR in management planning of CKNP and capacity building of Karakoram International University through Socio- Economic and Environmental Development (SEED) Project. Deputy Secretary really appreciated the idea and efforts of identifying and mapping of ecological corridor. He said that it will be a good help to save the flora and fauna from the threat of habitat fragmentation. Ev-K2-CNR Social Mobilization Consultant further updated Deputy Secretary about the meetings held with CKNP, DNP and the communities. Consultant NRM further highlighted the issues of climate change, disaster risk, approval and designation of CCHAs which are being faced by the buffer zone communities of CKNP and DNP. DS informed Ev-K2-CNR delegation about the initiatives which are being taken by the Department of Forest, Wildlife and Environment including Social Forestry, Green Pakistan Program, Management Planning of Protected Forests, landscaping of city parks and awareness raising campaigns.

Meeting with Secretary Agriculture, Livestock & Fisheries Gilgit, 05th June, 2018 Secretary Office Agriculture, Gilgit Meeting with Secretary Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries was held at his office in Gilgit on Tuesday, 05st June, 2018. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting: 1. Mr. Sajjad Haide, r Secretary Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries Gilgit Baltistan

Ev-K2-CNR 2. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

102 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Discussion Ev-K2-CNR Project Coordinator briefed the secretary about the new project of UNDP and Ev-K2-CNR as one of the implementing partner. Consultant NRM informed the secretary in detail about the interventions of the project and particularly the tasks assigned to Ev-K2-CNR including management and operation planning of CKNP and DNP and mapping of an ecological corridor between CKNP and DNP.

The secretary assured Ev-K2-CNR all his possible support for this important and needed project. He said that Ev-K2-CNR has long history of high altitude research on environment, management planning of protected areas and engagement with the communities and government line departments in the mountainous regions of Gilgit Baltistan. Social Mobilization Consultant further briefed the Secretary about the meetings with buffer zone communities of DNP. He conveyed the miseries of the communities regarding soil erosion, climate change, wolves and snow leopard attacks on the livestock, need of predator proof corrals and development and maintenance of water channels and status of fisheries in the water bodies of CKNP and DNP. Secretary suggested contacting IFAD project as they have planned interventions in several various valleys of CKNP in Distrcit Ghanche. Consultant NRM further emphasized some needful interventions from the soil conservation department for Satpara Valley, a buffer zone community of DNP. Consultant Social Mobilization further added the training and capacity building needs of the communities in agriculture, agri produce marketing, rearing, sowing, water and soil conservation.

Meeting with CKNP Buffer Zone Community Thaley, 03rd June, 2018 Thaley Valley, Ghanche Ev-K2-CBR Pakistan Office organized a meeting with CKNP Buffer Zone community on Sunday, 3rd June, 2018 at the office of LSO - Thalay valley in District Ghanche. The agenda of the meeting was to present the UNDP Project “Improvement of Central Karakoram National Park (CKNP) Management System as Model for the Mountain Ecosystems of Northern Pakistan” and discuss various possible aspects of collaboration. The following participants from both sides attended the meeting:

LSO Thalay 1. Local Support Organization Representatives (list annexed)

103 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

Ev-K2-CNR 1. Mr. Riaz Ul Hassan, Project Coordinator, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 2. Mr. Arif Hussain, Consultant Social Mobilization, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 3. Mr. Muhammad Aurangzaib, Consultant NRM, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan 4. Mr. Muhammad Raza, SO, Ev-K2-CNR Pakistan

Presentation and Discussion Mr. Arif Hussain delivered introductory remarks and briefed the community about the project and activities assigned to Ev-K2-CNR. Mr. Arif clearly stated that Ev-K2-CNR is dealing with only soft component of the project so the community should not expect any livelihood or practical interventions. LSO president presented an introduction of LSO, achievements, expectations from UNDP and Ev-K2-CNR and challenges they are facing. LSO president briefed the participants about the history, geography and socio economic condition of the valley inhabitants. LSO Thaley is one of the very active community organizations in CKNP, there are 16 villages in UC Thaley, 1246 households (HH) with a total population of 12720 consisting 6060 males and 6660 females. The literacy rate is low and especially in females: only 16% males and 5% female are literate. The valley altitude ranges from 2600 to 5800 meters and hosts 3 lakes and 12 glaciers. The LSO president informed that majority of pastures of degraded. There are 40 pastures for the community of Thaley, majority of them about 25 are degraded. The main reasons are lack of rotation, lack of water and climate change. The community unanimously urged to initiate some steps for pasture management as majority of pastures are degraded and many people are being forced to quit the herding and livestock rearing, it may create more unemployment in the valley. Moreover the president commented that the packs of wolves have been seen around the valley and two snow leopards have also been recorded in the nearby Nallahs. LSO president presented list of activities including development, conservation, education, health and hygiene, tourism, conflict resolution, capacity building, water and sanitation, social forestry, livestock management and fodder cultivation interventions have been the carried out. The main challenges described by the LSO president are; I. Scattered population II. Climate Change III. High rate of unemployment IV. Low literacy rate of females

The community was of the view that there should be representation of the valley in CKNP watch and ward mechanism, the current game watcher for Thaley is from Balghar valley and the community demands their own representative instead.

104 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

During the discussion, LSO president informed the participants that the valley is rich in aromatic and medicinal plants. So there is need of some good scientific research about the available medicinal plants, their benefits and local use. The community expressed their disappointment that despite their excellent conservation efforts their case for Community Controlled Hunting Area (CCHA approval)is in pending from last two years. They urged to have this support, getting their request approved as it is a genuine case and community has shown great conservation initiatives in the valley. According to them once the population of Ibex was extremely low (13 ibex) because of poaching but now the population of ibex is about 370. Community demanded yak rearing initiatives; there are about 1600 to 2000 yaks in the valley. Due to climate change and degradation of the pastures the community also requested support for fodder (alpha alpha) cultivation. LSO president informed that the valley has a great potential of ecotourism. They have lush green valleys, beautiful rivers, lakes, glaciers, pastures, stunning treks to K2 and Shigar and opportunities of climbing. They asked some support to construct one bridge, camp site development and marketing and accommodation facilities for tourists. In the presentation, the community informed that the Thaley is one of the best potatoes production areas in the whole GB and in that context ETI project by IFAD is going to implement some potato value chain initiatives but there is no initiative of land development due to unavailability of land and community conflicts. Despite of the good production the lion’s share of their efforts are being taken away by the middle men, hence they requested for support in marketing. The community requested for proposal development support.

Attendance Sheet

105 Ev-K2-CNR Inception Report (Q2), June 2018

106