DOCSLIB.ORG

The Right to Social Security: Can It Be Brought to Court?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Right to Social Security: Can It Be Brought to Court? The right to social security: Can it be brought to court? The right to social security has been successfully brought before international and regional courts and bodies that are empowered to receive applications or complaints and consider alleged violations of rights categorized a priori as civil or political. This became possible when the interconnection between the right to social security and other rights and principles was demonstrated. Although this type of indirect protection has proved to be significant, there are still aspects of social security that are poorly served by it or excluded from it. The development of direct justiciability mechanisms would rectify this situation. Christian Courtis1 brief of global and regional human rights courts and property. We will now examine how this protection International Commission of Jurists bodies that are empowered to receive applications, functions in two regional human rights systems, the petitions and complaints. European and the Inter-American. This report will endeavour to present several 1. Introduction different ways in which various aspects of the right 2.1. European human rights system The right to social security2 has been included in the to social security – through its interconnection with In the European system of human rights, this form of catalogue of human rights since the adoption of the other rights – have been addressed by courts and protection has manifested through the application of Universal Declaration of Human Rights itself in 1948 bodies empowered to consider alleged violations of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Conven- (see Article 22).3 It is also enshrined in a significant rights categorized a priori as civil or political. tion for the Protection of Human Rights and Funda- number of global and regional human rights trea- Without pretension to being exhaustive we will mental Freedoms. The central issue is the scope of ties and in instruments adopted by the International consider below three principal means of indirect the terms “property” or “possessions” in the article’s Labour Organization (ILO).4 protection for aspects of the right to social security: text. A narrow consideration of these terms could Nothing of what is said here is intended to deny a) aspects of social security as a component of in- limit the scope of the article, for example, to property the conceptual possibility of regarding the right to terests protected under the right to property; b) pro- understood only in the sense of physical property social security as an actionable right.5 National expe- cedural aspects relating to due process guarantees or property already incorporated in a person’s total riences demonstrate that the right to social security, and effective judicial tutelage of the right to social assets. But a wider interpretation of interests that can including rights derived from social security regimes, security; and c) the prohibition of discrimination and be included in the terms “property” or “possessions” together with employment rights, are areas in which the equality principle as applicable to the right to would allow for a looser notion of “property” that, litigation precedence is firmly established at a local social security. given the fulfilment of certain conditions, incorpo- level, both in developed and developing countries. rates the expectation of receiving a pension, or other However, at an international level, the scope of direct 2. The protection of the right to social form of money transfer, and of its maintenance, up- justiciability on this right has been limited, due par- security through the right to property dating or adjustment, among other possibilities. ticularly to the persistence of various restrictions that One of the indirect forms of protection for the right The old European Commission of Human Rights limit justiciability on economic, social and cultural to social security has been the inclusion of rights and the current European Court of Human Rights have rights. Nevertheless, adjudication on the right to so- and expectations relating to social security ben- clearly leaned towards this second possibility and have cial security falls within the judicial or quasi-judicial efits among the interests protected by the right to considered in many cases that social security benefits Director of the Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Programme, International Commission of Jurists, Geneva. Assistant professor in the Faculty of Law, University of PETITION MECHANISMS IN INTERNatioNAL Buenos Aires and invited professor in the Law Department of the Autonomous Technological Institute of Mexico (ITAM). A AND REGIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS BODIES complete version of this article is available in Spanish from: • At an international level, there is still no mechanism for applications and petitions that facilitates <www.socialwatch.org/es/informesTematicos/111.html>. the presentation of complaints about violations of rights embodied in the International Covenant References to “the right to social security” in this article include both contributory social security and non- of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR). However, Article 24 of the ILO Constitution contributory or welfare assistance; this differentiation is entitles unions and employers’ organizations to present ‘claims’ in the case of inadequate com- omitted as jurisprudence indicates its irrelevance in the pliance by the state with a convention that it is party to. This includes conventions relating to light of protection offered by rights incorporated in civil and social security such as Conventions 102, 121, 128, 130, 168, 103 revised, 118 and 157, among political rights instruments. others. See for example, Andreassen, B.A. (1999). “Article 22”, in Alfredsson, G. and Eide, A. (comps.), The Universal Declaration • In Europe the Additional Protocol to the European Social Charter, which establishes a system of Human Rights: A Common Standard of Achievement. The of collective complaints, allows legitimate stakeholders to present complaints alleging an Hague: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, p. 453-488. unsatisfactory implementation of obligations arising from the European Social Charter of See Courtis, C. (2003). “El derecho a la seguridad social en 1961, or its revised version of 1996, by a state that is party to it. el derecho internacional”, in Abramovich, V., Añón, M.J. and Courtis, C. (comps.), Derechos sociales: instrucciones de • The Inter-American human rights system allows for the presentation of individual petitions uso. Mexico: Fontamara, p. 257-270; Scheinin, M. (2001). to the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights alleging violations of the right to social “The right to social security”, in Eide, A. Krause, C. and Rosas, A. (comps.), Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. security as established by Article 16 of the American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of A textbook. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Martinus Nijhoff Man. Additionally, arguments have been made supporting the possibility of taking questions Publishers, 2nd Ed., p. 213-220. relating to direct violations of the right to social security to the Inter-American Court of Human Our general position on this can be found in Abramovich, Rights, but the practical application of this has thus far been disappointing. V. and Courtis, C. (2004). Los derechos sociales como derechos exigibles. Madrid: Trotta, 2nd Ed. Social Watch / 35 01-Temas_ing (01-80).indd 35 14/9/07 15:11:10 – including both contributory and non-contributory sen to achieve them. In social security, with its need effect on the substance of the right. In this case, the benefits – constitute “property” or “possessions”, for complex system management, this notion has Court considered that a difference of 38% between as referred to in Article 1 quoted above, and that they been reflected in the opinion of the Commission, the pension received by the woman applicant and therefore deserve protection against state actions that subsequently adopted by the European Court, that the one she would have received in the same condi- prejudice their peaceful enjoyment. the acknowledgement of the possible extension of tions had she been a man, constituted an unjustified So, for example, even in 1971 the now inexist- property right protection to social security benefits and discriminatory difference in treatment.12 It could ent European Commission of Human Rights held does not imply the guaranteeing of the right to a par- be argued that this percentage represents at least a that “while it is clear that no right to a pension is as ticular amount. Neither does it signify the right to the guideline for what constitutes an intolerable differ- such included in the Convention (European Conven- establishment of specific types of benefit, given that ence in the area of social security. tion on Human Rights), the making of compulsory the state has a wide discretional margin to create and contributions to a pension fund may, in certain cir- design social security schemes and their mode of Discrimination and violations cumstances, create a property right in a portion of finance. And even in the case of public policy objec- of the equality principle such fund and that such right may be affected by tives that need to be prioritized, the state has a certain In a series of cases, the European Court has consid- the manner in which the fund is distributed.”6 The margin to choose the means and timetable for their ered allegations of discrimination or violations of the European Court of Human Rights has upheld this accomplishment. Finally, in order to establish the equality principle in relation to protection derived interpretation in many cases. The Court has also held existence of a pecuniary right, the Court requires that from the right to property as applied to social security that rights deriving from the payment of contribu- the person alleging a violation meets the conditions rights. These cases will be examined in section 4, tions to social security systems are pecuniary rights prescribed by the relevant national law for obtaining which is exclusively devoted to the issues of dis- as defined in Article 1 of Protocol No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Protection of the Right to Social Security in European Constitutions
    International Labour Organization The protection of the right to Social Security in European Constitutions . Compendium of provisions of European Constitutions . Comparative tables Prepared by Lola Tonini Alabiso Online Edition, 2012 www.ilo.org/normes International Labour Standards Department International Labour Office Geneva Copyright © International Labour Organization 2012 First published 2012 (Online version) Disclaimer The International Labour Organization (ILO) welcomes the opportunity to promote its activities and publications to the public. Please be advised that the material contained on this Web site is for information only. The ILO endeavors to update the information on this site on a regular basis, but cannot guarantee its accuracy at all times. The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. Preservation of immunities Nothing herein shall constitute or be considered to be a limitation upon or a waiver of the privileges and immunities of the International Labour Organization.
    [Show full text]
  • No. 34 the Right to Adequate Food
    UNITED NATIONS The Right to Adequate Food Human Rights Human Rights Fact Sheet No. 34 The Right to Adequate Food Fact Sheet No. 34 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Material contained in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, provided credit is given and a copy of the publication containing the reprinted material is sent to the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, Palais des Nations, 8–14 avenue de la Paix, CH–1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland. ii CONTENTS Page Abbreviations . iv Introduction . 1 I. WHAT IS THE RIGHT TO FOOD? . 2 A. Key aspects of the right to food . 2 B. Common misconceptions about the right to food. 3 C. The link between the right to food and other human rights . 5 D. The right to food in international law. 7 II. HOW DOES THE RIGHT TO FOOD APPLY TO SPECIFIC GROUPS?. 9 A. The rural and urban poor . 10 B. Indigenous peoples. 12 C. Women . 14 D. Children. 16 III. WHAT ARE THE OBLIGATIONS ON STATES AND THE RESPONSIBILITIES OF OTHERS? . 17 A. Three types of obligations. 17 B. Progressive and immediate obligations . 19 C. Obligations with international dimensions . 22 D. The responsibilities of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights
    Universal Declaration of Human Rights Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people, Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law, Whereas it is essential to promote the development of friendly relations between nations, Whereas the peoples of the United Nations have in the Charter reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person and in the equal rights of men and women and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom, Whereas Member States have pledged themselves to achieve, in cooperation with the United Nations, the promotion of universal respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms, Whereas a common understanding of these rights and freedoms is of the greatest importance for the full realization of this pledge, Now, therefore, The General Assembly, Proclaims this Universal Declaration of Human Rights as a common standard of achievement for all peoples and all nations, to the end that every individual and every organ of society, keeping this Declaration constantly in mind, shall strive by teaching and education to promote respect for these rights and freedoms and by progressive measures, national and international, to secure their universal and effective recognition and observance, both among the peoples of Member States themselves and among the peoples of territories under their jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man
    AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN (Adopted by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogotá, Colombia, 1948) WHEREAS: The American peoples have acknowledged the dignity of the individual, and their national constitutions recognize that juridical and political institutions, which regulate life in human society, have as their principal aim the protection of the essential rights of man and the creation of circumstances that will permit him to achieve spiritual and material progress and attain happiness; The American States have on repeated occasions recognized that the essential rights of man are not derived from the fact that he is a national of a certain state, but are based upon attributes of his human personality; The international protection of the rights of man should be the principal guide of an evolving American law; The affirmation of essential human rights by the American States together with the guarantees given by the internal regimes of the states establish the initial system of protection considered by the American States as being suited to the present social and juridical conditions, not without a recognition on their part that they should increasingly strengthen that system in the international field as conditions become more favorable, The Ninth International Conference of American States AGREES: To adopt the following AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN Preamble All men are born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and, being endowed by nature with reason and conscience, they should conduct themselves as brothers one to another. The fulfillment of duty by each individual is a prerequisite to the rights of all.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Right to Food: the Meaning of General Comment No
    The “Breakthrough” of the Right to Food: The Meaning of General Comment No. 12 and the Voluntary Guidelines for the Interpretation of the Human Right to Food Sven Söllner1 I. Sources of the Right to Food 1. Major Human Rights Instruments 2. Humanitarian Law 3 Declarations 4. Regional International Law 5. National Constitutions II. General Comment No. 12 1. State Obligations Under the Right to Adequate Food a. Respect b. Protect c. Fulfil 2. The Normative Content of Article 11 ICESCR a. Adequacy b. Availability c. Accessibility 3. The General Principles of the ICESCR a. “Maximum of Available Resources” and “Progressive Realisation” b. Minimum Core Content/Core Obligation c. Non-Discrimination d. Participation e. Extraterritorial Obligations 1 This article is based on a working paper written together with Jennie Jon- sén for a Symposium in Mannheim (IBSA – Indicators for the Right to Food, 22 and 23 May 2006, Mannheim). A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 11, 2007, p. 391-415. © 2007 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in The Netherlands. 392 Max Planck UNYB 11 (2007) III. Voluntary Guidelines 1. Background 2. Legal Status 3. Content a. Main Content b. Structure and Content 4. Significance The right to food was finally established in international law in article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) as a legal binding norm, but it did not receive the necessary attention for a long time. FoodFirst Information and Action Network (FIAN) was set up in 1986. As an NGO it focussed on the right to food; the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (CESCR) was established as an expert body of ECOSOC and became operative in 1987.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Rights Approach to Social Protection
    Dr. Magdalena Sepúlveda of Chile has worked for the past four years for the United Nations Human Rights Council as Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights. In its resolution 8/11 (2008), the UN Human Rights Council requested that she examine the relationship between extreme poverty and the enjoyment of human rights, paying particular attention to the situation of vulnerable groups and the impact of discrimination. The Special Rapporteur set out to elaborate and promote a human rights framework for social protection, identifying best practices and disseminating lessons learned. Her approach involves the application of the central human rights principles of the human rights framework - equality and non- discrimination (including accessibility, acceptability, affordability and the incorporation of the gender perspective), participation, transparency and accountability - to the design, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of social protection systems. In this publication Dr. Sepúlveda and her assistant Ms. Carly Nyst have synthesised the key findings and recommendations from the following reports of the Special Rapporteur to the UN Human Rights Council and General Assembly: Human Rights Approach to Social Protection The 1) Human rights and cash transfer programmes; 2) The role of social protection in the face of the global financial crisis; 3) A human rights framework for non-contributory pensions; 4) The importance of social protection measures in achieving the MDGs, with a particular focus on gender-related concerns; and 5) The human rights approach to recovery from the global economic and financial crises. The publication also draws from the Special Rapporteur's country reports on Ecuador, Zambia, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Ireland, Timor-Leste and Paraguay.
    [Show full text]
  • Former U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents: Retired Without Benefits
    POLICY BRIEF 04.03.20 Former U.S. Lawful Permanent Residents: Retired Without Benefits Tran N. Dang, J.D., The Rhizome Center for Migrants INTRODUCTION LEGAL IMMIGRANTS: THE PERMANENT MEMBERS OF U.S. SOCIETY Mexico has been the leading country of origin for U.S. lawful permanent residents The Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (LPRs) each year since 1978.1 LPRs are outlines various paths for obtaining LPR persons the United States has granted status in the United States, including- but the privilege to reside permanently in not limited to- foreign nationals who are the country.2 In 2015, the estimated LPR sponsored by a close family member who is a population in the United States exceeded U.S. citizen or LPR, and foreign nationals who 13 million, of which Mexicans comprised are sponsored by an employer or otherwise 25%.3 Though LPRs pay taxes and have possess certain desirable skills.7 Once they many of the same rights as citizens except obtain LPR status, they are allowed to live that they cannot vote in U.S. federal, and work permanently in the United States, state and most local elections,4 they attend schools and universities, own property, enjoy less security than their U.S.-born and be eligible for Social Security benefits counterparts when it comes to accessing upon retirement or in the event of disability.8 An increasing and maintaining disability, retirement, and LPRs may join the Armed Forces and, if they number of Mexican survivors’ benefits (Social Security). Under meet certain requirements, naturalize, or legal permanent 9 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Guide to Human Rights 4.1 the Following Guide Contains Short Descriptions of Human Rights Regularly Considered by the Committee
    Page 1 PARLIAMENTARY JOINT COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RIGHTS Short guide to human rights 4.1 The following guide contains short descriptions of human rights regularly considered by the committee. State parties to the seven principal human rights treaties are under a binding obligation to respect, protect and promote each of these rights. For more detailed descriptions please refer to the committee's Guide to human rights.1 4.2 Some human rights obligations are absolute under international law, that is, a state cannot lawfully limit the enjoyment of an absolute right in any circumstances. The prohibition on slavery is an example. However, in relation to most human rights, a necessary and proportionate limitation on the enjoyment of a right may be justified under international law. For further information regarding when limitations on rights are permissible, please refer to the committee's Guidance Note 1 (see Appendix 4).2 Right to life Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR); and article 1 of the Second Optional Protocol to the ICCPR 4.3 The right to life has three core elements: it prohibits the state from arbitrarily killing a person; it imposes an obligation on the state to protect people from being killed by others or identified risks; and it imposes on the state a duty to undertake an effective and proper investigation into all deaths where the state is involved (discussed below, [4.5]). 4.4 Australia is also prohibited from imposing the death penalty. Duty to investigate Articles 2 and 6 of the ICCPR 4.5 The right to life requires there to be an effective official investigation into deaths resulting from state use of force and where the state has failed to protect life.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Protection and the Right to Food
    RIGHT TO FOOD ISSUES BRIEF 3 Social Protection and the Right to Food Social protection is a direct and immediate support to individuals who are unable to meet * basic needs, such as an adequate food intake. By targeting populations living in poverty it also contributes to social development and economic growth. The right to social security and the right to food are complementary and interdependent * human rights. Social protection programs have a crucial impact in ensuring access to food, decent health care and education – all basic human rights that lead to an adequate standard of living. Social protection programs provide concrete and effective instruments to increase levels * of human capital (improving levels of health, nutrition, education and social integration) and household income. This translates into higher resilience and better ability to cope and manage risks. Social protection programs require active and meaningful participation of all stakeholders to * secure ownership, legitimacy and long-term sustainability of the program. Independent evaluation and complaint mechanisms leading to corrective actions strengthen the * effectiveness of programs and protect people against corruption and other forms of abuse. The importance of social protection as a social and This Issues Brief aims to provide some guidance to economic stabilizer became particularly visible during decision makers on applying a human rights-based the global food crisis of 2008 and the economic and approach to social protection programmes since they financial crisis of 2009. As stated in SOFI 2012, significantly contribute to the progressive realization of social protection is crucial for accelerating hunger the right to food. reduction. First, it can protect the most vulnerable who do not benefit from economic growth; second, Social protection programmes can social protection when properly structured, can respond to different levels of protection contribute directly to more rapid economic growth.
    [Show full text]
  • American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man
    AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN (Adopted by the Ninth International Conference of American States, Bogotá, Colombia, 1948) WHEREAS: The American peoples have acknowledged the dignity of the individual, and their national constitutions recognize that juridical and political institutions, which regulate life in human society, have as their principal aim the protection of the essential rights of man and the creation of circumstances that will permit him to achieve spiritual and material progress and attain happiness; The American States have on repeated occasions recognized that the essential rights of man are not derived from the fact that he is a national of a certain state, but are based upon attributes of his human personality; The international protection of the rights of man should be the principal guide of an evolving American law; The affirmation of essential human rights by the American States together with the guarantees given by the internal regimes of the states establish the initial system of protection considered by the American States as being suited to the present social and juridical conditions, not without a recognition on their part that they should increasingly strengthen that system in the international field as conditions become more favorable, The Ninth International Conference of American States AGREES: To adopt the following AMERICAN DECLARATION OF THE RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF MAN Preamble All men are born free and equal, in dignity and in rights, and, being endowed by nature with reason and conscience, they should conduct themselves as brothers one to another. The fulfillment of duty by each individual is a prerequisite to the rights of all.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint and Appeals Mechanisms: Protecting the Right to Social Security [Zero Draft]
    ILO brief Social Protection Spotlight Date: January 2021 Complaint and appeals mechanisms: Protecting the right to social security [zero draft] Key points Access to sound and effective complaint and The Social Security (Minimum Standards) appeal mechanisms, as well as remedies, is core Convention, 1952 (No. 102) and the to any rights-based social security system. subsequently adopted more advanced standards lay out the basic principles and Redress mechanisms are an essential vehicle for parameters of the right to complaint and the effective exercise of every individual’s right to appeal as regards the quality and quantity of social security. They provide a means for users to benefits. seek an impartial review of the due application of the legal framework as a means to guarantee the These were most recently confirmed and human right to social security. further elaborated by the Social Protection Floors Recommendation, 2012 (No. 202) Such mechanisms also allow social protection which specifically advocates for redress systems, and the actors that are part of these, to mechanisms to be: impartial, transparent, be held accountable and “in touch” with their effective, simple, rapid, accessible and constituents through the detection and possible inexpensive. remedy of malfunctions, inefficiencies or violation of rights and obligations during the initial stages States have a duty to establish and effectively of collection and processing of complaints. implement the parameters of effective complaint and appeal mechanisms by International human rights and social security translating these principles into tangible standards enshrine the right to recourse and rights and obligations. independent review as well as the underlying principles for the design of social protection systems generally, and complaint and appeal mechanisms specifically.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrant Access to Social Protection Under Bilateral Labour Agreements: a Review of 120 Countries and Nine Bilateral Arrangements
    ESS – Extension of Social Security Migrant access to social protection under Bilateral Labour Agreements: A review of 120 countries and nine bilateral arrangements Clara van Panhuys Samia Kazi-Aoul Geneviève Binette ESS – Working Paper No. 57 Social Protection Department Labour Migration Branch Conditions of Work and Equality Department INTERNATIONAL LABOUR OFFICE, GENEVA Copyright © International Labour Organization 2017 First published 2017 Publications of the International Labour Office enjoy copyright under Protocol 2 of the Universal Copyright Convention. Nevertheless, short excerpts from them may be reproduced without authorization, on condition that the source is indicated. For rights of reproduction or translation, application should be made to ILO Publications (Rights and Licensing), International Labour Office, CH-1211 Geneva 22, Switzerland, or by email: [email protected]. The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with a reproduction rights organization may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. ISSN 1020-9581 ; 1020-959X (web pdf) The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. The responsibility for opinions expressed in signed articles, studies and other contributions rests solely with their authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by the International Labour Office of the opinions expressed in them.
    [Show full text]