DOCSLIB.ORG

Economic Impact of Coal Exports Approaches $1 Billion Pier 6

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Economic Impact of Coal Exports Approaches $1 Billion Pier 6 Volume 77, No. 10 October 2013 Published by the Virginia Maritime Association, Norfolk, Virginia email: [email protected] • web site: www.VAMaritime.com Economic Impact of Coal Exports Approaches $1 Billion ld Dominion University released its 14th Annual State of the Region report. The eight-part report dedicated an Oentire segment to “Coal: A Very Important Economic Engine in Hampton Roads.” Hampton Roads is the largest coal port in the United States as well as one of the largest coal ports in the world. The area is home to three coal terminals: Lambert’s Point Dock, owned and operated by Norfolk Southern; Pier IX, owned and operated by Kinder Morgan; and Dominion Terminal Association, owned by subsidiaries of Alpha Natural Resources, LLC, Arch Coal, Inc. and Peabody Energy. In 2011, the three terminals transported a combined 47 million metric tons of coal through the port. Photo courtesy of Dominion Terminal Associates Many services are linked directly or indirectly to the transportation Despite growth in other energy sources over the past decade, the of coal, creating an economic ripple effect for freight forwarders, report shows coal remained the primary energy source in the U.S. ship agents, testing labs, samplers, surveyors, tugs and harbor and worldwide. Although in 2011, coal was used more often to pilots, plus an extensive range of auxiliary services. generate electricity than natural gas, the trend shows a decline in the use of coal for domestic electricity. However, it should not Hampton Roads handled roughly 40% of the U.S. coal export negatively impact the prosperity of the Port. Three-quarters of volumes in the past decade. Based on ODU’s data, the economic the aggregate coal shipments through Hampton Roads consists impact to the area equates to approximately 4,200 employees of metallurgical coal, primarily used to produce steel. with over $200 million in earnings and generates more than $900 million in goods and services for the region. To review the full report, visit our website news section. Pier 6 Golden Anniversary Topped with Record Coal Loading orfolk Southern’s Pier 6 celebrated its Golden Anniversary thriving steel industry that required low-sulfur, low volatile, on September 18, 2013. Built 50 years ago at a cost of $25 high-energy coal that the Appalachian coalfields were famous Nmillion, Pier 6 is still the world’s largest and fastest coal for. N&W’s decision to build a new pier was in response to handling facility. The pier has been extended twice from its increasing demand from overseas customers for the high quality original 1,600 foot length to 1,800 feet to accommodate vessels Appalachian coal. as they increased in size. Pier 6’s twin coal loaders are the largest moving machines in the U.S., capable of dumping 20,000 tons N&W engineers began drawing up plans for a new coal pier. When an hour. Pier 6’s operating efficiencies are such that no vessel the McDowell-Wellman Engineering Company of Cleveland, anywhere can accept coal as fast as the facility can load it. Ohio was tasked to design and build Pier 6 in 1961, there was no prototype to follow. The new pier had to be biggest, the fastest, In 1959, Norfolk & Western (now Norfolk Southern) acquired the and the most efficient coal pier in the world. They wanted it Virginian Railway, a railroad that brought central Appalachian to be able to handle loading 100,000-ton plus ships that were coal to Norfolk, giving N&W access not only to more mines, but expected in the future. consolidated Virginian’s two coal piers at Lamberts Point. This increased their efficiencies, yet put more strain on N&W’s export In the 1960’s, N&W Railway ran an advertisement that posed the facilities. Lambert’s Point’s first coal piers were primarily built to question “Why would a railroad build a $25 million coal pier?” load steam coal destined for domestic coastwise clients. That That question has been answered time and again over the changed as the economies in Europe and Japan recovered after WWII and coal exports grew. In the 1950’s, Japan developed a (continued on page 5) VIRGINIA MARITIME MIC Golf Classic Results ASSOCIATION OFFICERS n October 26, 130 golfers headed toward the tee boxes of Cedar Point CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD Country Club in Suffolk, Virginia, to support the Virginia Maritime Thomas W. Godfrey, Jr. OAssociation’s Maritime Issues Council (MIC). PRESIDENT Shirley G. Roebuck MIC is a Political Action Committee established by the Association in 2000 to work on behalf of our maritime industry with the Virginia General Assembly. Each year, VICE PRESIDENTS the maritime industry must address many issues with the General Assembly and Joseph A. Dorto Raymond A. Newlon our legislators. Funds generated through MIC are used to support these efforts. Jeffrey S. Heller Winning the round with a score of 59 was the team playing for JR Research: John EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY Arthur W. Moye, Jr. Rachels, Bill Magann, Jim Bento, and George MacDonald. Tim Foley with Gilco Properties, and Jesse Welsch of Endurance IT Services, “let it rip” down the fairway TREASURER to win the “Longest Drive” contests, while the accurate shots of Jeff Davidson, Judy M. Barrett Domestic Fuels and Lubes, Terry Voltz, W F Magann, and Pat Hall, Kinder Morgan, ASSISTANT TREASURER won the “Closest to the Pin” titles. It was the precision of Will Chaney that stunned Michael W. Coleman everyone when he made a hole-in-one on tee number 12. Congratulations to you all for a round well played. STAFF VMA would like to take this opportunity to recognize and thank the companies who VICE PRESIDENT David C. White supported this event through sponsorships. These sponsorships help make this event successful. Platinum Sponsors: Hampton Roads Shipping Association, Kinder AccoUNTING MANAGER/CONTROLLER Morgan Terminals, McAllister Towing, and Norfolk Southern; Gold Sponsors: CV Sam Davis International, CP & O, Gilco Properties, Liberty Tire, T. Parker Host, Troutman Sanders, EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT Vandeventer Black, and the Virginia Pilot Association; Silver Sponsors: Bay Diesel Janice S. Klasek Corporation, Capes Shipping Agencies, Colonna’s Shipyard, Dominion Terminal Associates, GreatWide/RJR Elite, Hasler & Company and Newport News Shipbuilding; EvENTS COORDINATOR Jennifer N. Parham and Bronze Sponsors: Arreff Terminals, Bay Disposal & Recycling, D.D. Jones, Givens Logistics, Jackson Lewis, Kemper Consulting, Launch Pad Consulting, The Hampton SHIPDESK CLERK Roads Global Commerce Council, W. F. Magann, and Western Branch Diesel. Lynne H. Stonum MEMBERSHIP/PUBLICATION COORDINATOR & EDITOR S usan N. Wisniewski ANCHOR MEMBERS Branscome, Inc. CSX Intermodal Maersk Line Limited McAllister Towing of Virginia TowneBank Virginia International Terminals Virginia Pilot Association Virginia Port Authority MARITIME BULLETIN is published 12 times a year by Virginia Maritime Association. Subscriptions are available through membership in the Association. Recipient of Presidential “E” and “E Star” Awards for Excellence in Export Service Recipient of ASAE Communication Excellence & Honorable Mention Award L-R Jim Bento, John Rachels, George MacDonald, missing from the group shot is Bill Magann. 2 MARITIME NEWS JLARC Reports on Performance and Operations of the Virginia Port Authority n October 15, the Joint Legislative Audit and Review they interviewed VPA and VIT staff and board members; Commission (JLARC) released a draft report on VPA customers in the shipping community (shippers, ocean Othe “Review of the Virginia Port Authority’s (VPA) carriers, rail and trucking companies); staff of other state Competitiveness, Funding and Governance.” port authorities, and economic development staff at State, Regional and Local government levels, as well as maritime The General Assembly’s Joint Legislative Audit and Review industry experts. To gain a proper perspective, members of Commission (JLARC) is the oversight agency established to JLARC also visited VPA’s container terminals. evaluate the operations and performance of State agencies The key findings of the current report are: and programs. It is how the General Assembly ensures that the funds it has appropriated are used effectively and efficiently • To date, the Virginia Port Authority (VPA) has competed by State and local agencies. The Commission is comprised of successfully against other ports to handle cargo destined nine members of the House of Delegates and five members for Virginia and the surrounding region and for major of the Senate. One of the objectives of JLARC is to make Midwest markets. recommendations on ways State agencies may achieve greater efficiency and effectiveness in their operations. • VPA’s plans for future growth in a highly competitive industry appear reasonable and will result in capabilities In October 2012, an initial review of the VPA was prompted comparable to those of its competitors, but these during the process to evaluate the impact of port privatization. strategies will be costly. House Appropriations Committee Chairman, Lacey E. Putney, requested JLARC to further review the reports prepared by • VPA’s reputation for high prices does not appear to be paid consultants and determine whether the studies fairly a problem at this time, but could hinder its ability to and accurately assessed the successes and shortcomings of compete for some future cargo. Steps should be taken the operations, whether the comparisons to Ports in other to make sure its prices are competitive and that its states were fairly made, and if the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Spanning the North Fork Of
    Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Spanning the North Fork of the Shenandoah River on Virginia State Route 767 .9 mile east of the town of Quicksburg HAf" ^ and .7 mile west of the Valley Turnpike !//""'"* Quicksburg Vicinity /r Shenandoah County ^/9~(^l)iKj^\\ Virginia '""""^ ' ' 'l PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD MID-ATLANTIC REGION, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19106 m <? t - A U: HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD Shenandoah River Bridge HAER No. VA-52 Location: Spanning the North Fork of the Shenandoah River on Virginia State Route 767, .9 mile east of the town of Quicksburg and .7 mile west of the Valley Turnpike Quicksburg vicinity, Shenandoah County, Virginia UTM: 17.703180.4284800 Quad: New Market, Virginia Date of Construction: 1916; moved to present location in 1936 Fabricator: Virginia Bridge and Iron Company of Roanoke, Virginia Present Owner: Virginia Department of Transportation 1401 East Broad Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 Significance: The Shenandoah River Bridge is a good example of a riveted steel modified Camelback truss. Project Information: This documentation was undertaken in May 1990 under contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation as a mitigative measure prior to the removal and disposal of the bridge. Luke Boyd Historian A Archaeological Research Center Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond, Virginia Shenandoah River Bridge HAERNo.VA-52 [Page 2] History of the Shenandoah River Bridge and Crossing The bridge is located on Route 767 over the North Fork of the Shenandoah River in gently rolling farm country. It is approximately seven-tenths of a mile west of the Valley Turnpike, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Nomination Form
    (Rtv. 10-90) 3-I5Form 10-9fMN United States Department of the loterior National Park Service NATIONAL MGISTER OF HTSTORTC PLACXS REGISTRATION FORM Thiq fMm is for use in nomvlaring or requesting detnminatiwts for indin'dd propenies and di-. See immtct~onsin How m Cornplerc the National Regi~terof Wistnnc P1w.s Regaht~onForm (National Rcicpistcr Bullctin I6A) Complm each Item by mark~ng"x" m the appmprlalc box or b! entermp lhc mfommion requested If my ircm dm~wt apph to toe prombeing dwumemad. enter WfA" for "MIappliable." For functions. arch~tccruralclass~ficatron. materials, adarras of s~mificance.enm only -ones and subcak-gmcs from the rnswctions- Pl- addmonal enmcs md nmtive ncrns on continuation sheets MPS Form 10-9OOa). Use a tJ.pewritcr, word pmsor,or computer, to complete: all tterrus I. Name of Property historic name Virginian Railway Passenger Station other nameskite number VOHR site # 128-5461 2, Loration street & number 1402 Jefferson Street Southeast not for publica~ion city or town Roanoke vicinity state Veinia codcVA county code 770 Zip 24013 3. SlatelFderat Agencv Certification As the desipated authority under the National FIistoric Reservation An of 1986, as amended, 1 hereby certifj. that this -nomination -request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standads for regisrering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set fonh in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property -X- meets -does not meet the National Rcgister Criteria. I recommend that this pmwbe considered significant - nationally - statewide -X- locally. ( - See -~wments.)C ~ipnature~fcerti$ng official Date Viwinia De~srtrnentof Historic Resources Sme- or Federal agency rrnd bureau-- In my opinion, the property -meets -does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Classic Trains' 2014-2015 Index
    INDEX TO VOLUMES 15 and 16 All contents of publications indexed © 2013, 2014, and 2015 by Kalmbach Publishing Co., Waukesha, Wis. CLASSIC TRAINS Spring 2014 through Winter 2015 (8 issues) ALL ABOARD! (1 issue) 876 pages HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photographs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are commonly identified; if there is no common identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name. Items from countries from other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country name. ABBREVIATIONS: Sp = Spring Classic Trains, Su = Summer Classic Trains, Fa = Fall Classic Trains, Wi = Winter Classic Trains; AA! = All Aboard!; 14 = 2014, 15 = 2015. Albany & Northern: Strange Bedfellows, Wi14 32 A Bridgeboro Boogie, Fa15 60 21st Century Pullman, Classics Today, Su15 76 Abbey, Wallace W., obituary, Su14 9 Alco: Variety in the Valley, Sp14 68 About the BL2, Fa15 35 Catching the Sales Pitchers, Wi15 38 Amtrak’s GG1 That Might Have Been, Su15 28 Adams, Stuart: Finding FAs, Sp14 20 Anderson, Barry: Article by: Alexandria Steam Show, Fa14 36 Article by: Once Upon a Railway, Sp14 32 Algoma Central: Herding the Goats, Wi15 72 Biographical sketch, Sp14 6 Through the Wilderness on an RDC, AA! 50 Biographical sketch, Wi15 6 Adventures With SP Train 51, AA! 98 Tracks of the Black Bear, Fallen Flags Remembered, Wi14 16 Anderson, Richard J.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard L. Hoover Railroad Materials, 1848-1999
    Collection # M 1065 BV 4927-4948 OM 0535 RICHARD L. HOOVER RAILROAD MATERIALS, 1848-1999 Collection Information Historical Sketch Scope and Content Note Series Contents Processed by Maire Gurevitz January 2014 Manuscript and Visual Collections Department William Henry Smith Memorial Library Indiana Historical Society 450 West Ohio Street Indianapolis, IN 46202-3269 www.indianahistory.org COLLECTION INFORMATION VOLUME OF 60 manuscript boxes, 22 bound volumes, 3 folders oversize COLLECTION: manuscripts, 4 folders OVA photographs, 9 boxes black and white photographs, 1 box color photographs COLLECTION 1848-1999 DATES: PROVENANCE: Richard L. Hoover RESTRICTIONS: None COPYRIGHT: REPRODUCTION Permission to reproduce or publish material in this collection RIGHTS: must be obtained from the Indiana Historical Society. ALTERNATE FORMATS: RELATED Nickel Plate Road Collection, SC 2737; New York Central HOLDINGS: System Stock Certificates, M 0230; Centennial History of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company: 1846-1946, HE2791.P43 B8 1949; The Nickel Plate Story, HE2791.N593 R43 1965; The Road of the Century: the Story of the New York Central, HE2791.N555 1947; History of the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad, HE2791.B33 S76 1987; Pennsylvania Railroad in Indiana, HE2791.P43 W38 1999; New York Central Railroad Company, Time books, M 0734 ACCESSION 2004.0020 NUMBER: NOTES: Track sketches and valuation maps are folded to fit in Manuscript size folders due to space restrictions, and patrons may need assistance with unfolding those items. HISTORICAL SKETCH The majority of information in this collection comes from railroads that eventually became part of the New York Central Railroad system or the Pennsylvania Railroad. Lines that were leased or affiliated with New York Central contained in this collection include the Big Four route (Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan November 2007
    ǡ ʹͲͲ͹ Preparedby Inassociationwith: CBCLLimited BermelloAjamil&Partners,Inc. MartinAssociates Ports of Sydney Master Plan November 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A consortium of marine terminal owners and operators formed The Marine Group to plan the maritime future of Sydney Harbour. The ports community has come together to foster economic benefits to the region and to work towards common goals of increased port development and international shipping. The road map for this new direction is documented in the Ports of Sydney Master Plan (2007). THE MASTER PLAN REFLECTS LEADERSHIP OF THE MARINE GROUP The Marine Group consists of the following active members: x Laurentian Energy Corporation: Owners/Operators of Sydport Industrial Park x Logistec Stevedoring (Atlantic): Operators of International Coal Pier x Marine Atlantic: Crown Corporation – Operator of Newfoundland ferries x Nova Scotia Power: Owners of International Coal Pier x Provincial Energy Ventures: Operators of Atlantic Canada Bulk Terminal x Sydney Steel Company: Owners of Atlantic Canada Bulk Terminal x Sydney Ports Corporation: Operators of Sydney Marine Terminal GOALS ARE FOCUSED ON FUTURE GROWTH The Master Plan has been driven by targeting the achievement of the following interrelated goals: x Develop a consolidated vision for Sydney Harbour. x Identify opportunities for future growth and expansion. x Develop a Master Plan to capture opportunities. x Demonstrate the economic importance of the Harbour, both today and in the future. x Develop ways to better market Sydney Harbour to customers. PORTS OF SYDNEY ALREADY GENERATE SUBSTANTIAL ECONOMIC BENEFITS This Master Plan establishes for the first time, the economic impacts of the Ports of Sydney. Port activities within Sydney Harbour currently have substantial economic benefit to the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Articles for Sale.Indb
    MAP: DIRECTIONAL RUNNING IN THE U.S. AND CANADA >>IN THE NEWS www.TrainsMag.com • November 2009 Class I recession scorecard Amtrak’s budget blues >>>> TTECHNOLOGYECHNOLOGY SSPECIALPECIAL Time for electric trains! It’s not too late to switch from diesels America’s rail technology center PLUS Sounder: How a commuter railroad is changing the Pacifi c Northwest Smithsonian’s indispensable curator Why short-haul intermodal is the next big opportunity WIRED>> TECHNOLOGY SPECIAL UP The future of electrifi cation on America’s freight railroads Once an electrifi cation pioneer, America threw in its lot with the diesel and never looked back. Could recent social and economic forces prompt a string of catenary from sea to shining sea? by Scott Lothes © 2009 Kalmbach Publishing Co. This material may not be reproduced in any form 24 Trains NOVEMBER 2009 without permission from the publisher. www.TrainsMag.com ating and maintaining separate fl eets of power over such short distances. In every case, improving tunnel ventilation to allow diesel run-throughs proved cheaper than maintaining short electric districts. Tunnel electrifi cations paved the way for larger projects. Both the Virginian Railway and the Milwaukee Road strung wire over their steepest mountain districts, where electrics held the greatest advantage over steam. In 1925, the Virginian electrifi ed 134 miles of main line, including 14 miles of 2 percent grade against loaded coal trains out of Mullens, W.Va. Where three Mallets had taken 21⁄2 hours to heft a 5,500-ton train to the summit, two box-cab electrics whisked a 6,050-ton train up the grade in an hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Growing up Withtrains One Engineer's Dream
    Growing up withTrains One Engineer’s Dream by Dr. Arthur D. Delagrange, Massachusetts Beta ’62 t an early age I knew I wanted to be an engi- neer. However, I was confused aas to exactly what this meant. My father was an engineer; he disappeared into a factory building at 8 a.m. and came out at 5 p.m. I had seen the machinery inside, but it was mostly unattended, and what little I saw being done by people seemed rather uninterest- ing. On the other hand, I often walked down to the railroad tracks to watch the huge locomotives thun- dering by. The man at the throttle was also called an engineer. Now that looked like fun! As I learned more I came to realize I had it back- wards. I went to engineer- ing school to learn how to Steam survives at the Durango & Silverton Railroad and Museum in Colorado. design wonderful things (circuits, in my case) and made a When a new president took over, diesels were brought decent living at it. Alternatively, it was impressed upon me in as fast as they could be bought, begged, or borrowed. that the railroad engineer basically just had to obey orders. They required less infrastructure (no watering, no frozen If anything exciting happened, it was probably unpleasant. coal, no ash, no external moving parts, and less mainte- In fact, on a passenger train, the conductor was the man in nance) and were more flexible (zero warmup time instead charge. I engineered toy trains for 40 years before I had a of hours, single control of multiple units, all wheels driven, chance to drive real locomotives.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Health Implications of PM10 Concentrations Collected Near Lambert’S Point Coal Terminal
    Public Health Implications of PM10 Concentrations Collected near Lambert’s Point Coal Terminal NORFOLK, VA Letter Health Consultation July 19, 2017 Virginia Department of Health Division of Environmental Epidemiology Richmond, Virginia 23219 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA Department of Health MARISSA J. LEVINE, MD, MPH PO BOX 2448 TTY 7-1-1 OR STATE HEALTH COMMISSIONER RICHMOND, VA 23218 1-800-828-1120 July 19, 2017 Demetria Lindsay, MD District Director Norfolk City Health District 830 Southampton Ave. Ste. 200 Norfolk, VA 23510 Dear Dr. Demetria Lindsay, This letter is in response to your request for the Virginia Department of Health (VDH) to examine potential public health implications of particulate matter measuring 10 microns (PM10) and less generated by the Norfolk Southern’s Coal Pier in Norfolk, Virginia. Through a cooperative agreement with the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR), VDH evaluated air monitoring results provided by the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) to determine if PM10 is present at levels that could be harmful to the surrounding community. BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In response to community members’ concerns about coal dust originating from Norfolk Southern Railway Company’s (NS) operations at Lambert’s Point coal terminal NS agreed to operate three PM10 ambient air monitors near its Lambert’s Point coal pier. Following DEQ approval of the monitoring plan, NS began initial operation of the monitors on August 1, 2015. Monitors were located at the Hampton Roads Sanitary Department’s (HRSD) facility to the north of the coal piers and to the east of the NS pier administration building (ADMIN).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Roanoke River & Railroad Historic District Other names/site number: VDHR# 128-6393 Name of related multiple property listing: N/A (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing ____________________________________________________________________________ 2. Location Street & number: Albemarle Avenue, SE; Fourth Street, SE; Jefferson Street, SE; Walnut Avenue, SE; Williamson Road, SE. City or town: Roanoke State: Virginia County: Independent City Not For Publication: N/A Vicinity: N/A ____________________________________________________________________________ 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this x nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Distribution Report - Annual OMB No
    U.S. Department of Energy Form Approved Energy Information Administration Coal Distribution Report - Annual OMB No. 1905-0167 Form EIA-6A (March 2005) Expires: 3/31/08 Instructions - Page 1 Burden: 5.0 hours I. PURPOSE This survey collects coal distribution data from U.S. coal mining companies and wholesale and retail coal dealers, including brokers. Information on coal production and purchases, distribution and stocks is collected to provide Congress with basic statistics concerning the origin, method of transportation, consumer use, and destination of U.S. coal, as required by the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974 (FEAA) (P.L. 93-275) as amended. These data appear in the Annual Coal Report, the Quarterly Coal Report, the Monthly Energy Review, and the State Energy Data Consumption Report. In addition, the Energy Information Administration uses the data for coal transportation related analysis and in short-term and long-term models such as the Short-Term Integrated Forecasting System (STIFS) and the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS) Coal Market Module. The forecast data appear in the Short-Term Energy Outlook and the Annual Energy Outlook publications. II. WHO SHALL SUBMIT Form EIA-6A shall be submitted by all companies in the 50 United States and the District of Columbia that owned or purchased and distributed 50,000 or more tons of coal during the reporting year. All companies in the states of Arkansas, Maryland, Oklahoma, and anthracite operations in Pennsylvania that owned or purchased and distributed 10,000 or more short tons during the year shall submit the Form EIA-6A. These companies include coal mining companies, wholesale coal dealers (including brokers), and retail coal dealers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tariff Csxt 8200-J
    _____________ TARIFF CSXT 8200-J Cancels CSXT 8200-I Series Tariff and Supplements CONTAINING COAL RATE DISTRICTS, MILEAGE SCALE PRICES AND RULES AND PRICES COVERING ACCESSORIAL SERVICES ON COAL (STCC 11) AND COKE (STCC 29 914) (THE DIRECT PRODUCT OF COAL) COAL/COKE/ACCESSORIAL SERVICES PRICE CATALOG ISSUED: June 10, 2008 EFFECTIVE: July 1, 2008 1 SECTION CONTENTS Governing Rules Contains Rules and Regulations Governing Application of Tariff 1 Weighing 2 Frozen Lading 3 Overloaded Cars and Unauthorized Use of Cars 4 Reconsignment/Diversion 5 Trainload/Unit Train Service 6 Not Used 7 Origin Rate Districts Alphabetically by States and Rate Districts 8 Coal/Coke Demurrage (except for those provisions found in Section 5) 9 Mileage Scale 10 Transfer and Dumping Service 11 CSXT System Car Cleaning 12 Fuel Surcharge 13 Credit Term, Payment of Charges, and Finance Charge 14 Explanation of Reference Marks 2 CSXT 8200-J PLAN OF TARIFF APPLICATION OF TARIFF: (No change in prices) This tariff publication contains Coal Rate Districts, Mileage Scale Prices, and Rules and Prices covering Accessorial Services on Coal (STCC 11) and Coke (the direct product of Coal) (STCC 29 914). CSXT provides essential transportation services to consignors, consignees, and terminals transferring coal to barges and vessels that involve the movement of empty and loaded coal cars and their placement at Mine Origins and destinations. The associated transportation performance requirements for these shipments are set forth in this tariff or other applicable transportation contracts. Any action by a consignor, consignee, or transfer terminal to initiate a reservation request from the carrier for loading of cars at a Mine Origin designated in this tariff will constitute acceptance of all the rules, requirements, and applicable charges contained.
    [Show full text]
  • Loss of Rail Competition As an Issue in the Proposed Sale of Conrail to Norfolk Southern: Valid Concern Or Political Bogeyman
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 34 Issue 3 Article 6 1986 Loss of Rail Competition as an Issue in the Proposed Sale of Conrail to Norfolk Southern: Valid Concern or Political Bogeyman Mark D. Perreault Nancy S. Fleischman Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Business Organizations Law Commons, and the Transportation Law Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Mark D. Perreault & Nancy S. Fleischman, Loss of Rail Competition as an Issue in the Proposed Sale of Conrail to Norfolk Southern: Valid Concern or Political Bogeyman, 34 Clev. St. L. Rev. 413 (1985-1986) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LOSS OF RAIL COMPETITION AS AN ISSUE IN THE PROPOSED SALE OF CONRAIL TO NORFOLK SOUTHERN: VALID CONCERN OR POLITICAL BOGEYMAN? MARK D. PERREAULT* NANCY S. FLEISCHMAN** 1. INTRODUCTION ......... ..................................... 414 II. PRESERVATION OF RAIL-RAIL COMPETITION AS A CONSIDERATION IN RAIL CONSOLIDATIONS ............................... 414 A . Prior to 1920 ................................. 414 B . 1920 - 1940 .................................. 418 C. 1940 - 1980 .................................. 421 D . 1980 - Present ................................ 425 Ill. PRESERVATION OF RAIL-RAIL COMPETITION AS A CONSIDERATION IN THE FORMATION OF CONRAIL AND SUBSEQUENT DETERMINATION TO SELL CONRAIL ........ ........................................ 428 A. 1970's Congressional Response to the Penn Central and Other Railroad Bankruptcies ..................... 428 B. Foundation of Initial CongressionalPolicy ........... 429 C. Implementing the Policy ......................... 432 D.
    [Show full text]