Section I – E Xecutive Summary
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
VEEP Episode #410 “Election Night” Teleplay By
VEEP Episode #410 “Election Night” Teleplay by: Simon Blackwell & Tony Roche Story by: Armando Iannucci, Simon Blackwell & Tony Roche AS BROADCAST SCRIPT May 26, 2015 VEEP As Broadcast Script Episode #410 01:00:17 [HBO ENTERTAINMENT OPENING LOGO] INT. HOTEL SUITE BEDROOM – NIGHT. President Meyer is sitting on the edge of the bed staring out the window. Kent knocks as he enters. KENT East coast polls are closing, ma’am. Tom knocks as he enters. TOM Ma’am? History’s calling, and it won’t go to voicemail. Gary knocks as he enters. GARY Hey. You okay, ma’am? PRESIDENT MEYER Oh, I’d love one, Gary. Thank you. GARY Okay, I’ll get, I’ll get you one. PRESIDENT MEYER Well, I’ve asked America if she wants me to be her president. Now she’s gonna give us her answer. (clears throat) GARY America doesn’t just love you, ma’am, she is in love with you. (chuckles) PRESIDENT MEYER (chuckles) Daily Transcription 1 5/26/2015 VEEP EPISODE #410 MIKE (OS) We’ve lost Kentucky! 01:00:53 [MUSIC IN] [OPENING SEQUENCE] EXT. TV STUDIO – NIGHT. Establishing shot. Election Night 7:15 pm DAN (VO) I assume you reached out to... INT. TV STUDIO HAIR AND MAKE-UP ROOM – NIGHT. Dan and Amy are seated at dressing mirrors. DAN ...the O’Brien camp. You taking a meeting with Charlotte or with Kim? AMY No, I, I haven’t contacted the O’Brien team. DAN Amy, if he wins, our lobbying stock is gonna droop like a chimp’s tits. -
9/11 Report”), July 2, 2004, Pp
Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page i THE 9/11 COMMISSION REPORT Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page v CONTENTS List of Illustrations and Tables ix Member List xi Staff List xiii–xiv Preface xv 1. “WE HAVE SOME PLANES” 1 1.1 Inside the Four Flights 1 1.2 Improvising a Homeland Defense 14 1.3 National Crisis Management 35 2. THE FOUNDATION OF THE NEW TERRORISM 47 2.1 A Declaration of War 47 2.2 Bin Ladin’s Appeal in the Islamic World 48 2.3 The Rise of Bin Ladin and al Qaeda (1988–1992) 55 2.4 Building an Organization, Declaring War on the United States (1992–1996) 59 2.5 Al Qaeda’s Renewal in Afghanistan (1996–1998) 63 3. COUNTERTERRORISM EVOLVES 71 3.1 From the Old Terrorism to the New: The First World Trade Center Bombing 71 3.2 Adaptation—and Nonadaptation— ...in the Law Enforcement Community 73 3.3 . and in the Federal Aviation Administration 82 3.4 . and in the Intelligence Community 86 v Final FM.1pp 7/17/04 5:25 PM Page vi 3.5 . and in the State Department and the Defense Department 93 3.6 . and in the White House 98 3.7 . and in the Congress 102 4. RESPONSES TO AL QAEDA’S INITIAL ASSAULTS 108 4.1 Before the Bombings in Kenya and Tanzania 108 4.2 Crisis:August 1998 115 4.3 Diplomacy 121 4.4 Covert Action 126 4.5 Searching for Fresh Options 134 5. -
Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea
Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. Map of Guinea1 1 For the purposes of this report, we will be using the following names for the regions of Guinea: Upper Guinea, Middle Guinea, Lower Guinea, and the Forest Region. Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................1 Proxy Voting and Participation of Executive Summary .........................2 Marginalized Groups ......................43 The Carter Center Election Access for Domestic Observers and Observation Mission in Guinea ...............5 Party Representatives ......................44 The Story of the Guinean Security ................................45 Presidential Elections ........................8 Closing and Counting ......................46 Electoral History and Political Background Tabulation .............................48 Before 2008 ..............................8 Election Dispute Resolution and the From the CNDD Regime to the Results Process ...........................51 Transition Period ..........................9 Disputes Regarding First-Round Results ........53 Chronology of the First and Disputes Regarding Second-Round Results ......54 Second Rounds ...........................10 Conclusion and Recommendations for Electoral Institutions and the Framework for the Future Elections ...........................57 -
Democracy Reform: a Nationwide Surveys of Registered Voters; Each Wave Represents Approximately 1,000 Interviews Taken Over the Prior Three-Five Days
Update: Thursday, June 17th Democracy Reform: A Nationwide surveys of registered voters; Each wave represents approximately 1,000 interviews taken over the prior three-five days. GuideLatest wave conducted for June Advocates10-June 14, 2021. For more info, visit navigatorresearch.org Key Takeaways: • While Americans are divided on how the country is doing, most think we need major changes in how our government works. • A majority support the For the People Act and see urgency in its passage before next year’s midterm elections. • Out of a range of For the People Act proposals, those that curb corruption, create accountability, and ensure absentee ballot access are seen as those that would have the greatest personal impact for Americans. Nationwide surveys of registered voters; Each wave represents approximately 1,000 interviews taken over the prior three-five days. Latest wave conducted June 10-June 14, 2021. For more info, visit navigatorresearch.org Americans Are Divided on the State of the Country and Want “Major Changes” in How Government Works Nearly two in three Americans want “major changes” to the way our government works (63%). In general, do you think America's best days are ahead, Generally speaking, do you think we need to America is at its peak, or America is in decline? make major changes in the way our government works, minor changes, or no changes at all? America’s best America is America is in Major Minor No changes Total days are ahead at its peak Not sure decline changes changes Don’t know at all Changes Overall 40 7 12 41 63 27 5 5 90 Democrats 57 10 12 21 60 31 6 92 Independents 32 7 23 38 64 23 9 4 87 Republicans 23 5 9 63 67 23 3 7 90 Black 57 13 13 17 62 24 11 86 Hispanic 39 12 16 33 61 29 5 5 91 White 36 5 12 47 65 26 4 5 91 Asian 40 12 20 28 45 40 13 86 NationwideNationwide survey surveys of 1,001 of registered registered voters; voters Eachconducted wave representsJune 10-June approximately 14, 2021. -
Battle of the Brains: Election-Night Forecasting at the Dawn of the Computer Age
ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: BATTLE OF THE BRAINS: ELECTION-NIGHT FORECASTING AT THE DAWN OF THE COMPUTER AGE Ira Chinoy, Doctor of Philosophy, 2010 Dissertation directed by: Professor Emeritus Maurine Beasley Philip Merrill College of Journalism This dissertation examines journalists’ early encounters with computers as tools for news reporting, focusing on election-night forecasting in 1952. Although election night 1952 is frequently mentioned in histories of computing and journalism as a quirky but seminal episode, it has received little scholarly attention. This dissertation asks how and why election night and the nascent field of television news became points of entry for computers in news reporting. The dissertation argues that although computers were employed as pathbreaking “electronic brains” on election night 1952, they were used in ways consistent with a long tradition of election-night reporting. As central events in American culture, election nights had long served to showcase both news reporting and new technology, whether with 19th-century devices for displaying returns to waiting crowds or with 20th-century experiments in delivering news by radio. In 1952, key players – television news broadcasters, computer manufacturers, and critics – showed varied reactions to employing computers for election coverage. But this computer use in 1952 did not represent wholesale change. While live use of the new technology was a risk taken by broadcasters and computer makers in a quest for attention, the underlying methodology of forecasting from early returns did not represent a sharp break with pre-computer approaches. And while computers were touted in advance as key features of election-night broadcasts, the “electronic brains” did not replace “human brains” as primary sources of analysis on election night in 1952. -
Profile -Douglas -Sarpy
The Heartland Workers Center (HWC) has produced a Spanish -language candidate profile. The questions asked of candidates are separate from those asked by the League of Women Voters. The candidate profile can be accessed via this link: https://www.heartlandworkerscenter.org/candidates -profile -douglas -sarpy 1 WHAT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING US PRESIDENT OUR COUNTRY AND HOW DO YOU PLAN TO ADDRESS IT DURING YOUR FIRST 100 DAYS IN Note: All qualified presidential candidates were invited to OFFICE? provide biographical information and responses to specific questions. Candidates were qualified if they met the following Joe Biden: Pandemic. Recession. Racial injustice. Climate criteria during the primary season: change. We’re facing historic crises; we have to tackle them all at once. Character and experience count. I’ll listen to 1. The candidate must have made a public announcement of scientists, tell the truth, and make sure we’re never so her/his intention to run for President. unprepared for a pandemic again. I’ll expand the Affordable Care Act, lowering costs and making health care a right for all. 2. The candidate must meet the Presidential Election I’ll build our economy back better, and make racial equity Campaign Fund Act's minimum contribution threshold central to recovery. In these crises, we have an enormous requirements for qualifying for matching funds, based on the opportunity, if we come together. As President, I’ll draw on most recent data publicly available on the Federal Elections the best of us, not the worst. I’ll work as hard for those who Commission website. -
Voting System Failures: a Database Solution
B R E N N A N CENTER FOR JUSTICE voting system failures: a database solution Lawrence Norden Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law about the brennan center for justice The Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law is a non-partisan public policy and law institute that focuses on fundamental issues of democracy and justice. Our work ranges from voting rights to campaign finance reform, from racial justice in criminal law to presidential power in the fight against terrorism. A singular institution – part think tank, part public interest law firm, part advocacy group – the Brennan Center combines scholarship, legislative and legal advocacy, and communication to win meaningful, measurable change in the public sector. about the brennan center’s voting rights and elections project The Brennan Center promotes policies that protect rights, equal electoral access, and increased political participation on the national, state and local levels. The Voting Rights and Elections Project works to expend the franchise, to make it as simple as possible for every eligible American to vote, and to ensure that every vote cast is accurately recorded and counted. The Center’s staff provides top-flight legal and policy assistance on a broad range of election administration issues, including voter registration systems, voting technology, voter identification, statewide voter registration list maintenance, and provisional ballots. The Help America Vote Act in 2002 required states to replace antiquated voting machines with new electronic voting systems, but jurisdictions had little guidance on how to evaluate new voting technology. The Center convened four panels of experts, who conducted the first comprehensive analyses of electronic voting systems. -
Election Security Best Practices Guide (PDF)
ELECTION SECURITY BEST PRACTICES GUIDE TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION www.sos.texas.gov www.votetexas.gov 1.800.252.8683 ∗ (Last Revised: April 2020) INTRODUCTION To protect elections throughout the state from cyber threats, HB 1421(2019) requires the Texas Secretary of State (SOS) to adopt rules defining classes of protected election data and establishing best practices for identifying and reducing risk to the electronic use, storage and transmission of election data and the security of election systems. The best practices prescribed in this document were developed by reviewing aggregate findings from the Election Security Assessments (ESAs) of county election offices that were conducted as required by HB 1421, reviewing election security documentation published by the Center for Internet Security and the State and Local Election Security Playbook by Belfer Center, the National Institute for Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework, and consultation with select election security experts. This Election Security Best Practices Guide is intended to help Election Authorities, defined as any organization that holds responsibility for conducting elections, by providing guidance on address cyberattack and other disaster risks that the Internet introduces to the election process. Defending elections not only involves protecting voting machines and ballots, but also protecting the functions and technologies that support election processes and manage voter and election result data. While most of the recommendations are directed -
Leading Female Characters: Breaking Gender Roles Through Broad City and Veep Abstract I. Introduction
82 — Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, Vol. 11, No. 1 • Spring 2020 Leading Female Characters: Breaking Gender Roles Through Broad City and Veep Christina Mastrocola Cinema and Television Arts Elon University Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements in an undergraduate senior capstone course in communications Abstract Historically, television has been dominated by male leads, but feminism and the challenges faced by working women are becoming more prominent in recent programming.This study analyzed two comedy television shows with female lead characters, Broad City and Veep, to examine if their main characters break traditional gender roles. In addition, this research studied if Broad City portrayed more feminist values than Veep, using feminist theory, which examines obvious and subtle gender inequalities. Three episodes from each show were chosen, selected by a ranking website. The coder analyzed three subcategories: behavior, interpersonal relationships, and occupation. This study concluded that both Broad City and Veep depicted strong female lead characters who broke gender roles continuously through their behavior, relationships, and occupation. Broad City depicted more feminist values through their main characters’ friendship, empowerment of female sexuality, as well as their beliefs against traditional gender roles. This conclusion sheds light on the fact that women in television, especially female lead characters, do not have to be portrayed in a traditionally feminine way. I. Introduction Society has placed gender roles upon men and women, expecting everyone to conform. These roles derive from “traditional societal roles and power inequalities between men and women” (Prentice & Carranza, 2002, p.1). These stereotypes are often learned through observation, including portrayals in television, film, and other forms of media. -
"Election Night" Guest: Clark Gregg [Intro
The West Wing Weekly 4.07: "Election Night" Guest: Clark Gregg [Intro Music] JOSH: You're listening to the West Wing Weekly. Welcome back. I'm Joshua Malina. HRISHI: And I'm Hrishikesh Hirway. Today we're talking about episode 7 of season 4, "Election Night". JOSH: It was written by Aaron Sorkin, the story’s by David Gerken and David Handelman, David Handelman, a friend of mine, and it was directed by Lesli Linka Glatter. Terrific director with whom I've worked on more than one occasion. It first aired, oh, all I wrote down was that it first aired, and you know what? I feel like that's good enough. [Hrishi laughing] JOSH: You don't care when it aired. It aired in 2002. HRISHI: No, I like knowing that it aired on November 6, 2002, which I think is a nice detail because it lines up with actual election week. JOSH: Indeed. HRISHI: Here's the synopsis from Warner Brothers. The official synopsis. I like this because of the way they talk about you. JOSH: Oh. HRISHI: Well, your character. "On election day Bartlet and his staff begin counting eXit poll votes across the country. In a conservative California congressional district the results have important implications for Sam and a maverick democratic campaign manager, Will Bailey." JOSH: I like the sound of that. HRISHI: "Meanwhile Donna meets an intriguing Navy Lt. Commander, Jack Reese, who has been transferred to the White House as Deputy Military Aide." JOSH: Played by Jack Nicholson impersonator, Christian Slater. Just kidding. If you're listening you're your own man and you're a terrific actor. -
Electoral Assistance HTN Final 08 December
How to note VERSION 1.0: DECEMBER 2010 On Electoral Assistance Comments on this note are welcome via www.dfid.gov.uk. Staff can comment and access further resources on the DFID Elections Hub . A summary version of the note is also available on these sites. For further advice on elections contact DFID‘s Politics and the State Team or the FCO‘s Human Rights and Democracy Group. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Why should the UK support elections? 3 2.1 Opportunity and risk in the electoral process .............................................................................. 3 2.2 Deciding on UK support to elections ............................................................................................ 5 3 Planning and delivering electoral support 8 3.1 Define clear goals and objectives.................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Identify and manage risks ........................................................................................................... 10 Tools for identifying risk ........................................................................................................... 11 Risks of violence ....................................................................................................................... 12 Mitigating actions .................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Agree support modalities ........................................................................................................... -
Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo November 28, 2011 Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The Carter Center strives to relieve suffering by advancing peace and health worldwide; it seeks to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and protect and promote human rights worldwide. Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo November 28, 2011 Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................2 Postelection Developments ..................55 Executive Summary .........................4 Tabulation ..............................55 Presidential Election Results ................60 Historical and Political Background ...........13 Legislative Results .........................61 Electoral Institutions and Legal Framework for Electoral Dispute Resolution .................63 the Presidential and Legislative Elections ......16 Legal Framework .........................16 Conclusions and Recommendations . .66 Electoral System ..........................18 Appendix A: Acknowledgments . 73 Election Management ......................21 Appendix B: Terms and Abbreviations ........75 Boundary Delimitation .....................26 Appendix C: Letters of Invitation ............76 Pre-Election Developments ..................28 Appendix D: The Carter Center Observation Voter Registration .........................28