Profile -Douglas -Sarpy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Omaha, Nebraska, Experienced Urban Uprisings the Safeway and Skaggs in 1966, 1968, and 1969
Nebraska National Guardsmen confront protestors at 24th and Maple Streets in Omaha, July 5, 1966. NSHS RG2467-23 82 • NEBRASKA history THEN THE BURNINGS BEGAN Omaha’s Urban Revolts and the Meaning of Political Violence BY ASHLEY M. HOWARD S UMMER 2017 • 83 “ The Negro in the Midwest feels injustice and discrimination no 1 less painfully because he is a thousand miles from Harlem.” DAVID L. LAWRENCE Introduction National in scope, the commission’s findings n August 2014 many Americans were alarmed offered a groundbreaking mea culpa—albeit one by scenes of fire and destruction following the that reiterated what many black citizens already Ideath of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. knew: despite progressive federal initiatives and Despite the prevalence of violence in American local agitation, long-standing injustices remained history, the protest in this Midwestern suburb numerous and present in every black community. took many by surprise. Several factors had rocked In the aftermath of the Ferguson uprisings, news Americans into a naïve slumber, including the outlets, researchers, and the Justice Department election of the country’s first black president, a arrived at a similar conclusion: Our nation has seemingly genial “don’t-rock-the-boat” Midwestern continued to move towards “two societies, one attitude, and a deep belief that racism was long black, one white—separate and unequal.”3 over. The Ferguson uprising shook many citizens, To understand the complexity of urban white and black, wide awake. uprisings, both then and now, careful attention Nearly fifty years prior, while the streets of must be paid to local incidents and their root Detroit’s black enclave still glowed red from five causes. -
Section I – E Xecutive Summary
SECTION I – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The mission of the State Election Commission is to ensure every eligible citizen has the opportunity to register to vote, participate in fair and impartial elections, and have the assurance that their vote will count. Over the past decade, the business of conducting elections has become vastly more complex and subject to exceptional scrutiny by voters, candidates, media, and the legal community as never before. This requires everyone involved in the elections process, whether at the municipal, county, or state level, to become more technologically savvy, be better trained, and possess a higher level of election expertise. This is the environment in which the State Election Commission (SEC) must operate and carry out its mission. As the chief election agency in South Carolina, the SEC is tasked with the responsibility of overseeing the voter registration and election processes in the State. Everything that we do as an agency, our programs and our projects, emanates from these responsibilities. The primary mission and goal is to provide the highest level and quality of service possible within our statutory mandates. The SEC maintains the State’s computerized statewide voter registration system. The system contains voter registration data on every registered voter in South Carolina. All county voter registration offices have online access to the database. The SEC is responsible for printing the lists of registered voters for all elections held in the State, which averages approximately 300 each year. In combination with the driver’s license file, the system also serves as the source for jury selection lists in the State. -
Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea
Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. Map of Guinea1 1 For the purposes of this report, we will be using the following names for the regions of Guinea: Upper Guinea, Middle Guinea, Lower Guinea, and the Forest Region. Observing the 2010 Presidential Elections in Guinea Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................1 Proxy Voting and Participation of Executive Summary .........................2 Marginalized Groups ......................43 The Carter Center Election Access for Domestic Observers and Observation Mission in Guinea ...............5 Party Representatives ......................44 The Story of the Guinean Security ................................45 Presidential Elections ........................8 Closing and Counting ......................46 Electoral History and Political Background Tabulation .............................48 Before 2008 ..............................8 Election Dispute Resolution and the From the CNDD Regime to the Results Process ...........................51 Transition Period ..........................9 Disputes Regarding First-Round Results ........53 Chronology of the First and Disputes Regarding Second-Round Results ......54 Second Rounds ...........................10 Conclusion and Recommendations for Electoral Institutions and the Framework for the Future Elections ...........................57 -
Download This
i n <V NFS Form 10-900 OMB NO. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name N/A other names/site number South Omaha Main Street Historic District 2. Location street & number 4723-5002 So. 24th Street N ffi^ not for publication city, town Omaha N /A! vicinity state Nebraska code NE county Douglas code Q55 zip code 68107 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property X private I I building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local fxl district buildings public-State EH site _ sites public-Federal I I structure _0_ structures I I object _0_ objects 36 _9_Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously N/A listed in the National Register 1 ___ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this [x] nomination LJ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. -
September 2015 Nebraska Right to Life State Affiliate to the National Right to Life Committee
September 2015 Nebraska Right to Life State Affiliate to the National Right to Life Committee 404 S. 11th Street • P.O. Box 80410 • Lincoln, NE 68501 (402) 438-4802 • [email protected] • www.nebraskarighttolife.org UNDERCOVER VIDEOS SHOW SHOCKING REVELATIONS ABOUT HARVESTING ABORTED BABIES FOR POSSIBLE SALE In mid-July the first undercover personnel. Some show the “labs” inside video by The Center for Medical PP abortion facilities where PP techni- Progress came across social media cians and journalists posing as reps and exposed the shocking callous- from a tissue procurement company ness and candidness of Planned pick through bloody aborted baby parts, Parenthood Federation of America looking for organs and tissue. (PPFA) Affiliates personnel with The fifth video was filmed inside regard PP Affiliates’ harvesting of PP of the Gulf Coast’s mega clinic in aborted babies’ tissues and organs Houston. On camera their Director of for possible sale to a fetal tissue Research Melissa Farrell is caught procurement company. They have discussing their ability to deliver whole, been releasing one video a week intact babies for research. Inside the (one week there were two) and, at the PP “POC — Products of Conception” Coast is doing later-term abortions time of this writing, we have now seen lab we see more gruesome footage and the baby shown in this video was seven videos. Some are interviews of bloody baby parts being picked Continued on Page 3 with PP Affiliates and PPFA top level through by the lab tech. PP of the Gulf DOES NEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE HAVE A DEATH PENALTY POSITION? NO Q With the Legislature repealing the Death Penalty and the and non-sectarian. -
2020 General Election Nebraska
2020 General Election Nebraska www.vote411.org Email: [email protected] 2020 Nebraska General Election Table of Contents General 2020 Notes Nebraska Voters Urged to Vote by Mail Presidential Race Federal Races (Nebraska) U.S. Senator U. S. House of Representatives, District 1 U. S. House of Representatives, District 2 U. S. House of Representatives, District 3 Nebraska State Legislature State Legislature, District 1 State Legislature, District 3 State Legislature, District 15 State Legislature, District 17 State Legislature, District 21 State Legislature, District 23 State Legislature, District 25 State Legislature, District 27 State Legislature, District 29 State Legislature, District 35 State Legislature, District 37 State Legislature, District 43 State Legislature, District 45 State Legislature, District 49 Natural Resource Districts Central Platte District 4 Lower Big Blue District 1 Lower Elkhorn District 1 Lower Elkhorn District 2 Lower Elkhorn District 4 Lower Platte North District 3 Lower Platte North District 5 Lower Platte North District 7 Lower Platte North District 9 Lower Platte South District 2 Lower Platte South District 2 Lower Platte South District 9 Lower Platte South District 10 Middle Republican District 3 Nemaha District 4 Papio Missouri River Subdistrict 1 Papio Missouri River Subdistrict 3 Papio Missouri River Subdistrict 5 Papio Missouri River Subdistrict 7 Papio Missouri River Subdistrict 9 South Platte District 7 Upper Big Blue District 4 Upper Big Blue District 5 State Board of Education State -
USGLC's Nebraska Advisory Committee
Nebraska Advisory Committee These business, faith, military, and community leaders believe that Nebraska benefits when America leads in the world through investments in development and diplomacy. Hon. Ben Nelson Hon. Douglas Bereuter* Co-Chairs U.S. Senate, (2001-2013) U.S. House of Representatives Governor, (1991-1999) (1979 – 2004) Sher Jan Ahmadzai Jean Aime Shabanza Mbiya Bondo Hon. Trent Fellers* University of Nebraska, Omaha International American Relief Society Five Iron Advisory Director of the Center for Afghanistan Executive Director Principal Studies City of Lincoln Hon. Patty Pansing Brooks Councilman (2013-2017) Cindi Allen Nebraska State Legislature State of Nebraska State Senator Hon. Mike Flood Assistant Secretary of State Nebraska State Legislature David Brown Speaker (2007-2013) Roma Amundson* Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce Flood Communications, LLC Lancaster County Board of Commissioners President and CEO Owner Commissioner Howard W. Buffett Hon. Curt Friesen Leslie R. Andersen Buffett Farms Nebraska LLC Nebraska State Legislature Bank of Bennington President State Senator President and Chief Executive Officer University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lecturer Greg Fripp* Pastor Tom Barber Whispering Roots Peoples’ City Mission Jamie Carson Founder and CEO Chief Executive Officer Carson+Co Global Founder and CEO Renee Fry Kenneth W. Bayles, Ph.D. OpenSky Policy Institute University of Nebraska, Omaha Hon. John Cavanaugh* Executive Director Co-Director for the Global Center for Health U.S. House of Representatives Security Member (1977-1981) Judi M. Gaiashkibos Interim Associate Vice Chancellor for Nebraska Commission on Indian Affairs Hon. Tanya Cook Research and Creative Activity Executive Director Nebraska State Legislature at the Office of Research and Creative State Senator (2009-2016) Hon. -
Democracy Reform: a Nationwide Surveys of Registered Voters; Each Wave Represents Approximately 1,000 Interviews Taken Over the Prior Three-Five Days
Update: Thursday, June 17th Democracy Reform: A Nationwide surveys of registered voters; Each wave represents approximately 1,000 interviews taken over the prior three-five days. GuideLatest wave conducted for June Advocates10-June 14, 2021. For more info, visit navigatorresearch.org Key Takeaways: • While Americans are divided on how the country is doing, most think we need major changes in how our government works. • A majority support the For the People Act and see urgency in its passage before next year’s midterm elections. • Out of a range of For the People Act proposals, those that curb corruption, create accountability, and ensure absentee ballot access are seen as those that would have the greatest personal impact for Americans. Nationwide surveys of registered voters; Each wave represents approximately 1,000 interviews taken over the prior three-five days. Latest wave conducted June 10-June 14, 2021. For more info, visit navigatorresearch.org Americans Are Divided on the State of the Country and Want “Major Changes” in How Government Works Nearly two in three Americans want “major changes” to the way our government works (63%). In general, do you think America's best days are ahead, Generally speaking, do you think we need to America is at its peak, or America is in decline? make major changes in the way our government works, minor changes, or no changes at all? America’s best America is America is in Major Minor No changes Total days are ahead at its peak Not sure decline changes changes Don’t know at all Changes Overall 40 7 12 41 63 27 5 5 90 Democrats 57 10 12 21 60 31 6 92 Independents 32 7 23 38 64 23 9 4 87 Republicans 23 5 9 63 67 23 3 7 90 Black 57 13 13 17 62 24 11 86 Hispanic 39 12 16 33 61 29 5 5 91 White 36 5 12 47 65 26 4 5 91 Asian 40 12 20 28 45 40 13 86 NationwideNationwide survey surveys of 1,001 of registered registered voters; voters Eachconducted wave representsJune 10-June approximately 14, 2021. -
Annual Report
2015 ANNUAL REPORT Care PAC is a political fund of the Nebraska Health Care Association Dear friends and colleagues, We are happy to present the 2015 Care PAC Annual Report! Upon reviewing the next few pages, you will see that 2015 was another record-breaking year in terms of the amount raised. Care PAC raised $50,449, an increase of 18 percent from the previous year. Together we are truly making a difference. 2015 was an important year in Nebraska politics. Your Care PAC contributions helped new and current state legislators understand the complexities that long-term care providers face on a daily basis. Building a strong political action fund is the key to being a political powerhouse, so we can now turn our attention toward helping to elect the next wave of state legislators in 2016. When it comes to the political process, we can choose to stay disconnected and allow others to make decisions for us; or we can choose to become engaged and be the masters of our own destiny. Part of engaging in the political process is the ability to financially contribute to candidates who share our vision. Not only does this help like-minded candidates get elected, but also signals to the legislature that we’re serious. It helps us get a seat at the table when long-term care and other issues important to you are discussed. Please assist us as we work on your behalf by contributing to NHCA’s Care PAC. Our entire field will be better thanks to your generosity. Sincerely, Shari Terry, Co-Chair Care PAC Jayne Prince, Co-Chair Care PAC 2016 Care PAC Committee Jayne Prince, Co-Chair ............The Willows ................................................. -
Election Security Best Practices Guide (PDF)
ELECTION SECURITY BEST PRACTICES GUIDE TEXAS SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION www.sos.texas.gov www.votetexas.gov 1.800.252.8683 ∗ (Last Revised: April 2020) INTRODUCTION To protect elections throughout the state from cyber threats, HB 1421(2019) requires the Texas Secretary of State (SOS) to adopt rules defining classes of protected election data and establishing best practices for identifying and reducing risk to the electronic use, storage and transmission of election data and the security of election systems. The best practices prescribed in this document were developed by reviewing aggregate findings from the Election Security Assessments (ESAs) of county election offices that were conducted as required by HB 1421, reviewing election security documentation published by the Center for Internet Security and the State and Local Election Security Playbook by Belfer Center, the National Institute for Standards and Technology Cybersecurity Framework, and consultation with select election security experts. This Election Security Best Practices Guide is intended to help Election Authorities, defined as any organization that holds responsibility for conducting elections, by providing guidance on address cyberattack and other disaster risks that the Internet introduces to the election process. Defending elections not only involves protecting voting machines and ballots, but also protecting the functions and technologies that support election processes and manage voter and election result data. While most of the recommendations are directed -
Electoral Assistance HTN Final 08 December
How to note VERSION 1.0: DECEMBER 2010 On Electoral Assistance Comments on this note are welcome via www.dfid.gov.uk. Staff can comment and access further resources on the DFID Elections Hub . A summary version of the note is also available on these sites. For further advice on elections contact DFID‘s Politics and the State Team or the FCO‘s Human Rights and Democracy Group. Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Why should the UK support elections? 3 2.1 Opportunity and risk in the electoral process .............................................................................. 3 2.2 Deciding on UK support to elections ............................................................................................ 5 3 Planning and delivering electoral support 8 3.1 Define clear goals and objectives.................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Identify and manage risks ........................................................................................................... 10 Tools for identifying risk ........................................................................................................... 11 Risks of violence ....................................................................................................................... 12 Mitigating actions .................................................................................................................... 13 3.3 Agree support modalities ........................................................................................................... -
Nebraska Legislature: How They Voted for the Early Advantage of Children in the 104Th Legislative Session 2015 – 2016
Nebraska Legislature: How they Voted for the Early Advantage of Children in the 104th Legislative Session 2015 – 2016 Dear Nebraska Friends and Colleagues, July 2016 We have pulled together the following information to indicate how Nebraska’s State Senators voted for children on select occasions during the 104th Legislative Session. These selected votes were based on legislative proposals critical to impacting working families and their children. These proposals were priorities of the Holland Children’s Movement related to issues of health, education and economic stability. We have included a percentage of each senator’s support of these priorities based on their votes on specific legislative measures throughout 2015-16. These voting records do not indicate other legislative activities of interest to Nebraska’s children, such as committee votes or bills introduced. We are pleased to report that more than half of all senators voted in support of the position of the Holland Children’s Movement 80% or more of the time. We would like to extend our sincere appreciation to all of our senators for their dedication to public service and our gratitude for the actions taken to make Nebraska a national leader in opportunities for all children. We hope you will continue to support efforts to tackle the root causes of family poverty and assure that every child in Nebraska will have the support and opportunities they need to reach their full potential. Sincerely, John J. Cavanaugh Chief Operating Officer 1700 Farnam St, Ste 1090 Omaha, NE 68102 2016