DOCSLIB.ORG

MONTHLY REVIEW VOL. 71 NO. 6 an Independent Socialist Magazine Founded in 1949 by Leo Huberman & Paul M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
MONTHLY REVIEW VOL. 71 NO. 6 an Independent Socialist Magazine Founded in 1949 by Leo Huberman & Paul M NOVEMBER 2019 MONTHLY REVIEW VOL. 71 NO. 6 An Independent Socialist Magazine Founded in 1949 by Leo Huberman & Paul M. Sweezy John Bellamy Foster, Editor ◊ Brett Clark, Associate Editor ◊ Camila Quarta, Assistant Editor ◊ Martin Paddio, Business Manager ◊ Gordon Beeferman, Circulation ◊ R. Jamil Jonna, Associate Editor for Communications & Production Former Editors: Harry Magdoff (1969–2006) ◊ Ellen Meiksins Wood (1997–2000) ◊ Robert W. McChesney (2000–2004) 134 W. 29th Street, Suite 706 Editorial: [email protected] New York, NY 10001 Circulation: [email protected] tel: 212-691-2555 MR Online: [email protected] REVIEW OF THE MONTH On Fire This Time John Bellamy Foster 1 The Angler and the Octopus: Kim Jong-un’s Ongoing Peace Offensive Tim Beal 18 The Trial of Thomas Hardy: A Forgotten Chapter in the Working-Class Fight for Democratic Rights Ian Angus 41 Endgame Marxism (and Urbanism) Andy Merrifield 47 REPRISE U.S. Weakness and the Struggle for Hegemony Immanuel Wallerstein 54 POETRY This is our legacy Marge Piercy 61 REVIEW Race and Mystery in Cape Cod Nicholas Powers 62 Notes from the Editors Immanuel Wallerstein, the celebrated world-systems theorist and longtime contributor to Monthly Review and Monthly Review Press, died on August 31, 2019. Wallerstein first achieved international fame with the publication in 1974 of his The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (the first in a four-volume masterwork on the Modern World- System, which was to continue with volume II, Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 [1980]; volume III, The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730s–1840s [1988]; and volume IV, Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914 [2011]). For those who encountered Wallerstein’s The Modern World-System when it first appeared in the 1970s, the effect was electrifying. It was here that he introduced his fundamental distinction between the two kinds of world-systems: world-empires and world-economies, with the latter playing a relatively minor role in most of world history, since almost inevitably absorbed by tributary-based world-empires. World-empires were conceptualized as a single political entity, like the Roman Empire, ruling over large parts of the world, exacting tribute, but lacking econom- ic integration. A world-economy, in contrast, represented an integrated division of labor with divided political sovereignties. In this scheme, the distinctiveness of the capitalist world-economy, or the modern world-system, was that it constituted a single world-economy “ruled” over by competing nation-states, which had ex- isted for five hundred years without being transformed into a world-empire. The DOI: 10.14452/MR-071-06-2019-10_0 (continued on inside back cover) Archive user name: mrnov | password: 33h8 (continued from inside front cover) capitalist world-economy had the additional characteristic of being divided into a center, a semiperiphery, and a periphery. Wallerstein also postulated a third po- tential form of world-system, namely a socialist world government, which would integrate both economy and polity at the global level. In later analyses, Wallerstein was to develop this framework by examining shifting political hegemonies, long cycles (approximately twenty-five to thirty years in the up and down swings), un- equal exchange, commodity chains, understandings of race and gender within the modern world-system, and numerous other factors. Wallerstein conceived of the capitalist world-economy as a somewhat static structure historically in that it could not be said to advance or significantly mod- ify its laws of motion through the emergence of distinct stages via industrializa- tion—for example, mercantilism, freely competitive capitalism, and monopoly capitalism—as in traditional Marxist theory. Rather, the modern world-system adhered to the same basic framework in the twentieth century as in its six- teenth- and seventeenth-century origins. The main economic shifts and crises within the world-system were the result of the changes in the economic produc- tivity (as well as military development and financial architecture) of individual states, resulting in alterations in world hegemony. The late twentieth century and early twenty-first century were thus characterized above all by The Decline of American Power (the title of his 2003 book), just as the late nineteenth and ear- ly twentieth century had been dominated by the decline of British hegemony, and the mid–seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries by the decline of Dutch hegemony. In the twenty-first century, however, Wallerstein argued, the world for numerous reasons—economic-political-military-ecological—would not see a repetition of this pattern and the formation of a new hegemony. Rather, the tran- sition would be to a new, noncapitalist world-system, the nature of which was yet unknown, but which would most likely be rooted in a world revolution of which the global revolt of 1968 was a preamble. Wallerstein had started off his career in the 1960s as a mainstream social sci- entist concerned primarily with colonialism/decolonialism in Africa. However, he moved steadily to the left in his analysis as a result of his attempts to draw out the historical implication of Fernand Braudel’s longue durée, first in relation to Africa and then in relation to the Global South in general, leading to his the- ory of the modern world-system. Beginning with the publication of The Modern World-System, if not sooner, he came to be closely associated with the Marxian left. Over the next nearly half century, his work gave strong credence to tradi- tional theories of class exploitation and imperialism, relying extensively on Karl Marx’s analysis. His analysis thus increasingly overlapped with the dependency- and imperialist-theory traditions, as exemplified by Paul Sweezy, Harry Magdoff, Samir Amin, Andre Gunder Frank, and Giovanni Arrighi, the last three of whom, together with Wallerstein, came to be known as “the Gang of Four” and wrote a number of books together, including The Dynamics of Global Crisis (1982) and Transforming the Revolution (1990) for Monthly Review Press. (continued on page 64) Monthly Review (ISSN 0027 0520) is published monthly, except bimonthly in July/August, by Monthly Review Foundation, 134 West 29th Street, Suite 706, New York, NY 10001. Periodicals postage is paid at New York, NY 10001 and additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send all address changes to Monthly Review Foundation, 134 West 29th Street, Suite 706, New York, NY 10001. MR is indexed in the PAIS Bulletin, Historical Abstracts, America: History and Life, Political Science Abstracts, and the Alternative Press Index, P.O. Box 33109, Baltimore, MD 21218, tel.: (410) 243-2471. Newsstand Distribution: Ingram Pe- riodicals, 1240 Heil Quaker Blvd., P.O. Box 8000, La Vergne, TN 37086; tel. 800.627.6247; tel (718) 875-5491; Disticor Direct, 695 Westney Road South, Suite 14, Ajax, ON L1S 6M9, Canada, (800) 668-7724 or (905) 619-6565; Central Books, 99 Wallis Road, London E9 5LN, England. Annual subscriptions: U.S.A. and Canada–$39; students, seniors, and low income–$29; other foreign–us$47; foreign students, seniors, and low income–us$37. Libraries and institutions please e-mail [email protected]. Copyright ©2019 by Monthly Review Foundation. 64 (continued from inside back cover) In the final sentences of The Modern World-System in 1974, Wallerstein wrote: “The mark of the modern world is the imagination of its profiteers and the counter-assertiveness of the oppressed. Exploitation and the refusal to accept ex- ploitation as either inevitable or just constitute the continuing antinomy of the modern era, joined together in a dialectic which has far from reached its climax in the twentieth century.” ~ William (Bill) Edwin Foster, a longtime MR friend and supporter, father of MR editor John Bellamy Foster, died on September 1, 2019. Foster was a member of the Civilian Conservation Corps during the New Deal. He joined the U.S. Navy during the Second World War and served as a pharmacist’s mate in the Pacific. He graduated with a BA from the University of Washington and later became a school- teacher, medical adjudicator, and a used-bookstore owner, founder of Orca Books in Olympia, Washington. A lifelong socialist, he supported Henry Wallace for pres- ident in the 1948 elections. He often remarked on the termination of three profes- sors at the University of Washington in 1948, during the McCarthyite witch hunt, for refusing to say if they had or had not ever been members of the Communist Party and not signing loyalty oaths. Paul Sweezy, soon to cofound MR with Leo Huberman, had provided testimony in favor of the professors. Foster eventually became a strong supporter of Monthly Review. One of his fondest memories was meeting Sweezy and Harry Magdoff in New York in 1985. He spent his last years reading the magazine from cover to cover each month, engaging with the big ideas and doing research for MR Online, providing numerous postings for Editors’ News Wire. He was especially concerned with issues of U.S. imperial- ism, nuclear armaments, and climate change. In 2016, at age 95, he traveled alone to a talk by Bernie Sanders in Springfield, Oregon, waited for hours in line, and managed to get a seat near the front. In one of his very last statements, he said that Monthly Review had proven that it is possible to hold out for the truth and that it needed to continue its work. He will be greatly missed. ~ We were pleased to read the editorial note celebrating our seventieth anniver- sary in the latest issue of Capitalism Nature Socialism (vol. 30, no. 2). We republish it here to commemorate our many decades of work and to extend our thanks for the well-wishes: We would like to congratulate the Monthly Review Editors on occasion of the sev- entieth anniversary of that eminent journal.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Streeten's Major Writings Paul Marlor SWEEZY
    .... 642 Paul Marlor SWEEZY Paul Marlor SWEEZY 643 I out agreeing with the late David McCord Wright, who once said, 'When It was under these circumstances that acquired a mission in life, not all at once and self-consciously, but gradually and through a practice that had a logic of its people tell me I am fuzzy, I reply, "life is fuzzy'", the heterodox dis�enters own. That mission was to do what I could to make Marxism an integral and prefer, I think, to be accused of fuzziness. They prefer to be vaguely nght to respected part of the intellectual life of the country, or, put in other terms, to take being precisely wrong. It is a matter of taste. The orthodox may say, part in establishing a serious and authentic North American brand of Marxism. 'Reductionism is not the occupational disease of economists, it is their occu­ pation.' But if in the process they throw out the baby instead of the bathwater, In pursuing these interests at Harvard, Sweezy received encouragement the reduction surely loses its point. from the great conservative economist Joseph Schumpeter, whose analysis of the origins, development and impending decline of capitalism revealed a Streeten's Major Writings complex and critical appreciation of Marxist analysis. 17 (1949), 'The Theory of Profit', The Manchester School, (3), September. Obtaining his Ph.D. in 1937, Sweezy took a job as an instructor at Harvard (1950a), 'Mangel des Preismechanismus', Vo//beschdftigung, Cologne: Bundverlag. (l 950b), 'The Inappropriateness of Simple "Elasticity" Concepts m the Analysis of Interna­ until 1939 when he rose to the rank of assistant professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Review Press Catalog, 2011
    PAID PAID Social Structure RIPON, WI and Forms of NON-PROFIT U.S. POSTAGE U.S. POSTAGE Consciousness ORGANIZATION ORGANIZATION PERMIT NO. 100 volume ii The Dialectic of Structure and History István Mészáros Class Dismissed WHY WE CANNOT TEACH OR LEARN OUR WAY OUT OF INEQUALITY John Marsh JOSÉ CARLOS MARIÁTEGUI an anthology MONTHLY REVIEW PRESS Harry E. Vanden and Marc Becker editors and translators the story of the center for constitutional rights How Venezuela and Cuba are Changing the World’s Conception of Health Care the people’s RevolutionaRy lawyer DOCTORS 2011 Albert Ruben Steve Brouwer WHAT EVERY ENVIRONMENTALIST NEEDS TO KNOW ABOUT CAPITALISM JOHN BELLAMY FOSTER FRED MAGDOFF monthly review press review monthly #6W 29th Street, 146 West NY 10001 New York, www.monthlyreview.org 2011 MRP catalog:TMOI.qxd 1/4/2011 3:49 PM Page 1 THE DEVIL’S MILK A Social History of Rubber JOHN TULLY From the early stages of primitivehistory accu- mulation“ to the heights of the industrial revolution and beyond, rubber is one of a handful of commodities that has played a crucial role in shaping the modern world, and yet, as John Tully shows in this remarkable book, laboring people around the globe have every reason to THE DEVIL’S MILK regard it as “the devil’s milk.” All the A S O C I A L H I S T O R Y O F R U B B E R advancements made possible by rubber have occurred against a backdrop of seemingly endless exploitation, con- quest, slavery, and war.
    [Show full text]
  • Excerpted from James Gustav Speth, America, Rising to Its Dream (Forthcoming, Yale U.P., Fall 2012) * How Can We Gauge What
    !"#$%&'$()*%+,)-.,$/)01/'.2)3&$'45))!"#$%&'()*%+%,-)./)01+)2$#'")34/$15&/"%,-()6'7#)89:9()4'77);<=;>)) 6) 7+8)#.9)8$):.1:$)84.')4./)4.&&$9$()'+)1/);9)'4$)&./')*$8)($#.($/).9() 84$%$)8$)/'.9()'+(.<=)>9$)8.<)'+).9/8$%)'4;/)?1$/';+9);/)'+)@++A).')4+8)8$) #+,&.%$)8;'4)+'4$%)#+19'%;$/);9)A$<).%$./B)3+)@$'C/)@++A).').):%+1&)+*).(2.9#$() ($,+#%.#;$/DD'4$)#+19'%;$/)+*)'4$)>%:.9;E.';+9)*+%)!#+9+,;#)F++&$%.';+9).9() G$2$@+&,$9'),;91/)'4$)*+%,$%)3+2;$')H@+#)#+19'%;$/5)I$";#+5)J1%A$<5)K+%$.5) L#[email protected](5)M1"$,H+1%:5).9()0%$$#$B)J4$)%$,.;9;9:)#+19'%;$/N9;9$'$$9)9+')#+19';9:) '4$)O9;'$()3'.'$/N#.9)H$)'4+1:4')+*)./)+1%)&$$%)#+19'%;$/B)P4.')8$)/$$)84$9)8$) @++A).')'4$/$)#+19'%;$/);/)'4.')'4$)O9;'$()3'.'$/);/)9+8).')+%)2$%<)9$.%)'4$)H+''+,);9) .)4+/')+*);,&+%'.9').%$./B)J+)+1%):%$.')/4.,$5)Q,$%;#.)9+8)4./RS) T)'4$)4;:4$/')&+2$%'<)%.'$5)H+'4):$9$%.@@<).9()*+%)#4;@(%$9U) T)'4$):%$.'$/');9$?1.@;'<)+*);9#+,$/U) T)'4$)@+8$/'):+2$%9,$9')/&$9(;9:)./).)&$%#$9'.:$)+*)0GV)+9)/+#;.@)&%+:%.,/) *+%)'4$)(;/.(2.9'.:$(U) T)'4$)@+8$/')/#+%$)+9)'4$)OWC/);9($")+*)X,.'$%;.@)8$@@DH$;9:)+*)#4;@(%$9YU) T)'4$)8+%/')/#+%$)+9)'4$)OWC/):$9($%);9$?1.@;'<);9($"U) T)'4$)@+8$/')/+#;.@),+H;@;'<U) T)'4$)4;:4$/')&1H@;#).9()&%;2.'$)$"&$9(;'1%$)+9)4$.@'4)#.%$)./).)&$%#$9'.:$)+*) 0GV5)<$').##+,&.9;$()H<)'4$)4;:4$/'R) D);9*.9'),+%'.@;'<)%.'$) D)&%$2.@$9#$)+*),$9'.@)4$.@'4)&%+H@$,/) D)+H$/;'<)%.'$) D)&$%#$9'.:$)+*)&$+&@$):+;9:)8;'4+1')4$.@'4)#.%$)(1$)'+)#+/') D)@+8)H;%'4)8$;:4')#4;@(%$9)&$%)#.&;'.)Z$"#$&')*+%)-.&.9[) !"#$%&'()*+$%"$,"-%*+!./)0/&&-%*&")/0"#-)+*-" ! -1$%2"3+*4"*4/"&4$0*/&*"1+,/"/5)/#*-%#6"-*"7+0*4"8/5#/)*",$0"9/%(-0:"-%."
    [Show full text]
  • Globalisation - to What End?*
    GLOBALISATION - TO WHAT END?* Harry Magdoff By the end of 1990, foreign direct investment - that is, investment in manufacturing, real estate, raw materials extraction, financial institutions, etc., made by capitalists of all lands outside their national borders - reached over $1.5 trillion. Actually, this official estimate grossly under- states the case because it is based on book values. But even as a minimum estimate, what is significant about this number is not only its size but the unprecedented speed with which it has grown in the last two decades: the amount directly invested in foreign lands nearly tripled in the 1980s alone. Moreover, this investment went far beyond manufacturing and the extrac- tion of raw materials. To an ever larger extent foreign capital spread to such fields as finance, real estate, insurance, advertising, and the media. This upsurge and diversification of globalisation has been introducing new economic and political features in the countries of both the periphery and the core. In the periphery, foreign capital has penetrated more widely and deeply than ever before. In the core, the change of direction has helped produce in the world's key money markets an extraordinary spiralling of credit creation, international flows of money capital, and speculation. This new stage of globalisation has meanwhile given rise to questions about its longer-run significance. A widely accepted theory visualises the erosion of national sovereignty at the centres of capitalism, presumably to be replaced by an 'international' of capital that will make and enforce the rules of international relations. The more thoughtful members of the ruling capitalist class are well aware how chimerical the notion of a rising international of capital is.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism Has Failed — What Next?
    The Jus Semper Global Alliance In Pursuit of the People and Planet Paradigm Sustainable Human Development November 2020 ESSAYS ON TRUE DEMOCRACY AND CAPITALISM Capitalism Has Failed — What Next? John Bellamy Foster ess than two decades into the twenty-first century, it is evident that capitalism has L failed as a social system. The world is mired in economic stagnation, financialisation, and the most extreme inequality in human history, accompanied by mass unemployment and underemployment, precariousness, poverty, hunger, wasted output and lives, and what at this point can only be called a planetary ecological “death spiral.”1 The digital revolution, the greatest technological advance of our time, has rapidly mutated from a promise of free communication and liberated production into new means of surveillance, control, and displacement of the working population. The institutions of liberal democracy are at the point of collapse, while fascism, the rear guard of the capitalist system, is again on the march, along with patriarchy, racism, imperialism, and war. To say that capitalism is a failed system is not, of course, to suggest that its breakdown and disintegration is imminent.2 It does, however, mean that it has passed from being a historically necessary and creative system at its inception to being a historically unnecessary and destructive one in the present century. Today, more than ever, the world is faced with the epochal choice between “the revolutionary reconstitution of society at large and the common ruin of the contending classes.”3 1 ↩ George Monbiot, “The Earth Is in a Death Spiral. It will Take Radical Action to Save Us,” Guardian, November 14, 2018; Leonid Bershidsky, “Underemployment is the New Unemployment,” Bloomberg, September 26, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaching Socialism
    Approaching Socialism HARRY MAGDOFF AND FRED MAGDOFF 1. Can ‘Human Nature’ Change? Among the arguments against socialism is that it goes against human nature. “You can’t change human nature” is the frequently heard refrain. That may be true of basic human instincts such as the urge to obtain food to eat, reproduce, seek shelter, make and wear protective clothing. However, what has usually been referred to as “human nature” has changed a great deal during the long history of humankind. As social systems changed, many habits and behavioral traits also changed as people adapted to new social structures. Anatomically modern humans emerged some 150,000 to 200,000 years ago. Over the tens of thousands of years since, many different kinds of social organizations and societies have developed. Initially, most were based on hunting and gathering, while for about the last 7,000 years many have been based on agriculture. These societies were organized as clans, villages, tribes, city-states, nations, and/or empires. Anthropologists who studied “primitive” societies found very different human relations and human nature than the highly competitive, dog-eat- dog, selfish characteristics that have dominated during the capitalist period. The economics of these early precapitalist societies often took the form of reciprocity and redistribution. Trade existed, of course, but trade between tribes was not for personal gain. Agricultural land was neither privately owned nor could it be bought and sold, instead, it was generally allocated and reallocated by village chiefs. Much of the food collected by the chiefs was redistributed at village ceremonial feasts. There were wars and domi- nation by local tyrants—these were not perfect societies by any means—but they had different values, social mores, and “human natures.” As Karl Polanyi explained in 1944: “The outstanding discovery of recent historical and anthropological research is that man’s economy, as a rule, is submerged in his social relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Santa Barbara Dissertation Template
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Santa Barbara Defining the Monster: The Social Science and Rhetoric of Neo-Marxist Theories of Imperialism in the United States and Latin America, 1945-1973 A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in History by Christopher Cody Stephens Committee in charge: Professor Nelson Lichtenstein, Chair Professor Alice O’Connor Professor Salim Yaqub June 2018 The dissertation of Christopher Cody Stephens is approved. ____________________________________________ Salim Yaqub ____________________________________________ Alice O’Connor ____________________________________________ Nelson Lichtenstein, Committee Chair April 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I had the benefit of working with many knowledgeable and generous faculty members at UCSB. As my advisor and the chair of my dissertation committee, Nelson Lichtenstein has ushered the project through every stage of its development, from conceptualization to defense. I pitched the idea of writing a seminar paper on Andre Gunder Frank in his office roughly four years ago, and since then he has enthusiastically supported my efforts, encouraged me to stay focused on the end goal, and provided detailed feedback on multiple drafts. That is not to say that I have always incorporated all his comments/criticisms, but when I have failed to do so it is mostly out of lack of time, resources, or self-discipline. I will continue to draw from a store of Nelson’s comments as a blueprint as I revise the manuscript for eventual publication as a monograph. Alice O’Connor, Mary Furner, and Salim Yaqub also read and commented on the manuscript, and more broadly influenced my intellectual trajectory. Salim helped me present my work at numerous conferences, which in turn helped me think through how the project fit in the frame of Cold War historiography.
    [Show full text]
  • Regis Debray and Revolution
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1969 Regis Debray and Revolution Salvatore J. Ferrera Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Ferrera, Salvatore J., "Regis Debray and Revolution" (1969). Master's Theses. 2387. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/2387 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1969 Salvatore J. Ferrera RFGIS DEBRAY AND REVOLUTION LOYOLA UNIVERSITY, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE by Salvatore J. Ferrera This thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M~ster of Political Science 1969 TABLE OF CONTEN'rS Introduction . 1 Section I • . 7 Section II . 65 91 Bibliography • • e • • • • . INTFODUCTION R gis DEbray, twenty-eight year old FTench Marxist philosopher, now sits imprisoned for allegedly giving assis­ tance to the late Che Guevara in his attempt at sparking rev­ olution in Bolivia. It is now of little significance whether or not the Bolivian government's claim is true that Debray pro­ vid2d active assistance to the rebels, or whether it is true, as Dt-bray contends, that he was simply an observer of Che's activities.
    [Show full text]
  • (2011). What Every Environmentalist Needs to Know About Capitalism
    Magdoff, F. & Foster, J.B. (2011). What every environmentalist needs to know about capitalism: A citizen’s guide to capitalism and the environment. New York: Monthly Review Press. Preface Wealth, if limits are not set for it, is great poverty. -EPICURUS1 Ecological economist Herman Daly is well known for emphasizing what he has called the "Impossibility Theorem" of unlimited economic growth in a limited environment. Put concretely, an extension of a U.S.-style high consumption economy to the entire world of 7 billion people— much less the 9 billion-plus world population projected for the middle of the present century—is a flat impossibility.2 In this book we are concerned with extending Daly's Impossibility Theorem by introducing what we regard to be its most important corollary: the continuation for any length of time of capitalism, as a grow-or-die system dedicated to unlimited capital accumulation, is itself a flat impossibility. We are constantly being told by the vested interests—and even by self-designated environmentalists and environmental organizations—that capitalism offers the solution to the environmental problem: as if the further growth of capital markets, green consumption, and new technology provide us with miraculous ways out of our global ecological dilemma. Such views are rooted in an absolute denial of reality, or what John Kenneth Galbraith has called a system of "innocent fraud."' In this make-believe, Through the Looking Glass world, the wondrous work- ings of markets, perhaps tweaked here or there by regulations and incentives, make miracles possible. In the process, the laws of physics, chemistry, biology, and ecology—as well as the limits of the earth—are simply conjured away.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Marxism & Socialism
    History of Marxism & Socialism: A Chart of Key Figures with Comments Dr. Rodney G. Peffer SOCIALIST SOCIALIST ANARCHISM ANARCHISM CLASSICAL UTOPIAN EVOLUTIONARY PROTO-SOCIAL IN EUROPE: IN UK & USA: MARXISM: SOCIALISM: SOCIALISM: DEMOCRACY 19th-Early 20th C. 19th-Early 20th C. 19th Century Late 18th Century- Late 19th Century Late 19th Century Mid 19th Century Pierre Proudhon William Godwin Karl Marx (Later) Fr. Engels Louis Blanc Mikhail Bakunin Johann Most Friedrich Engels Gracchus Babeuf Ferdinand Lassalle Daniel De Leon Louis Blanqui Oscar Wilde Eleanor Marx Saint-Simon William Morris1 William Morris2 Louise Michel James Connolly Wilhelm Liebknecht Auguste Comte Eduard Bernstein1 Eduard Bernstein2 Pietr Kropotkin Big Bill Haywood; August Bebel Charles Fourier Edward Bellamy; Henry George Leo Tolstoy Mother Jones; Joe Hill; Karl Kautsky Robert Owen Charlotte Gilmore Richard Ely Luigi Fabbri John Reed Georgi Plekhanov Perkins Victor Berger "LIBERAL" IMPORTANT NON- SOCIALIST HETERODOX MARXISTS/ CLASSICAL AUSTRO- MARXIST SOCIAL SOCIAL ANARCHISM ECONOMISTS SOCIALISTS i MARXISM: MARXISM SCIENTISTS DEMOCRACY Early-Mid 20th C. Early-Mid 20th C Early-Mid 20th C. Early-Mid 20th C. Early-Mid 20th C. Early-Mid 20th C Early-Mid 20th C. Emma Goldman J.M. Keynes Eugene V. Debs; Helen V.I. Lenin Rudolph Hilferding Emile Durkheim Jean Jaurès; Alexander Berkman; Michael Kalecki Keller; Antonie Panne- Leon Trotsky Otto Bauer Thorsten Veblin Sidney & Beatrice Ricardo Flores Magón; Nicholas Kaldor koek; G.D.H. Cole; Rosa Luxemburg Max Adler Max Weber Webb; G.B. Shaw; Rudolf Rocker; Gunnar Myrdal José Carlos Mariátegui; Karl Liebnecht Victor Adler Joseph Schumpeter Ramsay MacDonald; Buenaventura Duratti Joan Robinson Victor Serge; Andres Franz Mehring Karl Renner Talcott Parsons Leon Blum Lucía Sánchez Saornil Piero Sraffa Nin; George Orwell; Antonio Gramsci Otto Neurath C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Monthly Review Press Catalog [PDF]
    PAID RIPON, WI. U.S. POSTAGE PERMIT NO. 100 PERMIT NO. NON-PROFIT ORG. NON-PROFIT MONTHLY REVIEW FOUNDATION MONTHLY Suite 29th Street, West 706 134 NY 10001 York, New monthlyreview.org VIJAY PRASHAD Washington Bullets is written in the best traditions “Like his hero Eduardo Galeano, of Marxist journalism and history-writing. It is a Vijay Prashad makes the telling of the truth lovable; book of fluent and readable stories, full of detail not an easy trick to pull off, he does it effortlessly.” about US imperialism, but never letting the minutiae obscure the larger political point. It is a book that — Roger Waters, Pink Floyd could easily have been a song of despair – a lament of lost causes; it is, after all, a roll call of butchers and assassins; of plots against people’s movements and governments; of the assassinations of socialists, Marxists, communists all over the Third World by the country where liberty is a statue. WASHINGTON BULLETS Despite all this, Washington Bullets is a book about possibilities, about hope, about genuine heroes. One such is Thomas Sankara of Burkina Faso – also assassinated – who said: ‘You cannot carry out fundamental change without a certain amount of madness. In this case, it comes from nonconformity, the courage to turn your back on the old formulas, the courage to invent the future. It took the madmen of yesterday for us to be able to act with extreme clarity today. I want to be one of those madmen. We must dare to invent the future.’ Vijay Prashad MONTHLY REVIEW PRESS Washington Bullets is a book infused with this madness, the madness that dares to invent the future.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the PDF File
    White Notebook #2 1 Translation of original notes from KGB archive Files by Alexander Vassiliev (1993-1996) Translated by Steve Shabad, reviewed and edited by Alexander Vassiliev and John Earl Haynes (2007) [Pagination and formatting track the handwritten original notebook. Phrases in English in the original are italicized. Phrases that were transliterated from English to Russian in the original are in Arial font. Marginal comments in the left margin are chiefly page numbers from the archival file while those in the right margin are Vassiliev’s topic designations, his own comments, or notes to himself. Endnotes were added in translation.] ************************************************************************************************* File 70545 “Myrna” p. 3 “Complex” U.S. Shipping Corp. World Tourists “Complex” p. 9 Elizabeth Bentley was unknown to the Comintern. An inquiry was sent to the Comintern in November 1939 (p. 8). p. 19 “Clever Girl” established contact with “Pal” in March-April 1942. A cipher cable from Maxim “Pal” regarding this is dated 5.04.42. She was instructed to keep regular contact with him once or twice a month. p. 21 More precisely: Letter from NY to C 19.4.42 “Clever Girl” traveled to see “Pal” on 30 March 1942. “Sound” was forbidden to meet with “Pal” because of the investigation of the latter. p. 22 After that contact was maintained through Lud Ullmann, who would come to NY. Sometimes “Clever Girl” traveled to Wash. Now the station gets all the materials from Sound and Pal through Clever Girl, with whom “Sergey’s” wife, “Shura,” is in contact. “Shura” passes the materials to “Stock” or another operative.
    [Show full text]