<<

NOVEMBER 2019 VOL. 71 NO. 6 An Independent Socialist Magazine Founded in 1949 by Leo Huberman & Paul M. Sweezy

John Bellamy Foster, Editor ◊ Brett Clark, Associate Editor ◊ Camila Quarta, Assistant Editor ◊ Martin Paddio, Business Manager ◊ Gordon Beeferman, Circulation ◊ R. Jamil Jonna, Associate Editor for Communications & Production

Former Editors: (1969–2006) ◊ (1997–2000) ◊ Robert W. McChesney (2000–2004) 134 W. 29th Street, Suite 706 Editorial: [email protected] New York, NY 10001 Circulation: [email protected] tel: 212-691-2555 MR Online: [email protected]

REVIEW OF THE MONTH On Fire This Time 1 The Angler and the Octopus: Kim Jong-un’s Ongoing Peace Offensive Tim Beal 18 The Trial of Thomas Hardy: A Forgotten Chapter in the Working-Class Fight for Democratic Rights Ian Angus 41 Endgame (and Urbanism) Andy Merrifield 47 REPRISE U.S. Weakness and the Struggle for Hegemony Immanuel Wallerstein 54

POETRY This is our legacy Marge Piercy 61

REVIEW Race and Mystery in Cape Cod Nicholas Powers 62

Notes from the Editors Immanuel Wallerstein, the celebrated world-systems theorist and longtime contributor to Monthly Review and Monthly Review Press, died on August 31, 2019. Wallerstein first achieved international fame with the publication in 1974 of his The Modern World-System: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century (the first in a four-volume masterwork on the Modern World- System, which was to continue with volume II, Mercantilism and the Consolidation of the European World-Economy, 1600–1750 [1980]; volume III, The Second Era of Great Expansion of the Capitalist World-Economy, 1730s–1840s [1988]; and volume IV, Centrist Liberalism Triumphant, 1789–1914 [2011]). For those who encountered Wallerstein’s The Modern World-System when it first appeared in the 1970s, the effect was electrifying. It was here that he introduced his fundamental distinction between the two kinds of world-systems: world-empires and world-economies, with the latter playing a relatively minor role in most of world history, since almost inevitably absorbed by tributary-based world-empires. World-empires were conceptualized as a single political entity, like the Roman Empire, ruling over large parts of the world, exacting tribute, but lacking econom- ic integration. A world-economy, in contrast, represented an integrated division of labor with divided political sovereignties. In this scheme, the distinctiveness of the capitalist world-economy, or the modern world-system, was that it constituted a single world-economy “ruled” over by competing nation-states, which had ex- isted for five hundred years without being transformed into a world-empire. The

DOI: 10.14452/MR-071-06-2019-10_0 (continued on inside back cover) Archive user name: mrnov | password: 33h8 (continued from inside front cover) capitalist world-economy had the additional characteristic of being divided into a center, a semiperiphery, and a periphery. Wallerstein also postulated a third po- tential form of world-system, namely a socialist world government, which would integrate both economy and polity at the global level. In later analyses, Wallerstein was to develop this framework by examining shifting political hegemonies, long cycles (approximately twenty-five to thirty years in the up and down swings), un- equal exchange, commodity chains, understandings of race and gender within the modern world-system, and numerous other factors. Wallerstein conceived of the capitalist world-economy as a somewhat static structure historically in that it could not be said to advance or significantly mod- ify its laws of motion through the emergence of distinct stages via industrializa- tion—for example, mercantilism, freely competitive , and monopoly capitalism—as in traditional Marxist theory. Rather, the modern world-system adhered to the same basic framework in the twentieth century as in its six- teenth- and seventeenth-century origins. The main economic shifts and crises within the world-system were the result of the changes in the economic produc- tivity (as well as military development and financial architecture) of individual states, resulting in alterations in world hegemony. The late twentieth century and early twenty-first century were thus characterized above all by The Decline of American Power (the title of his 2003 book), just as the late nineteenth and ear- ly twentieth century had been dominated by the decline of British hegemony, and the mid–seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries by the decline of Dutch hegemony. In the twenty-first century, however, Wallerstein argued, the world for numerous reasons—economic-political-military-ecological—would not see a repetition of this pattern and the formation of a new hegemony. Rather, the tran- sition would be to a new, noncapitalist world-system, the nature of which was yet unknown, but which would most likely be rooted in a world revolution of which the global revolt of 1968 was a preamble. Wallerstein had started off his career in the 1960s as a mainstream social sci- entist concerned primarily with colonialism/decolonialism in Africa. However, he moved steadily to the left in his analysis as a result of his attempts to draw out the historical implication of Fernand Braudel’s longue durée, first in relation to Africa and then in relation to the Global South in general, leading to his the- ory of the modern world-system. Beginning with the publication of The Modern World-System, if not sooner, he came to be closely associated with the Marxian left. Over the next nearly half century, his work gave strong credence to tradi- tional theories of class exploitation and , relying extensively on ’s analysis. His analysis thus increasingly overlapped with the dependency- and imperialist-theory traditions, as exemplified by , Harry Magdoff, Samir Amin, Andre Gunder Frank, and Giovanni Arrighi, the last three of whom, together with Wallerstein, came to be known as “the Gang of Four” and wrote a number of books together, including The Dynamics of Global Crisis (1982) and Transforming the Revolution (1990) for Monthly Review Press.

(continued on page 64)

Monthly Review (ISSN 0027 0520) is published monthly, except bimonthly in July/August, by Monthly Review Foundation, 134 West 29th Street, Suite 706, New York, NY 10001. Periodicals postage is paid at New York, NY 10001 and additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send all address changes to Monthly Review Foundation, 134 West 29th Street, Suite 706, New York, NY 10001. MR is indexed in the PAIS Bulletin, Historical Abstracts, America: History and Life, Political Science Abstracts, and the Alternative Press Index, P.O. Box 33109, Baltimore, MD 21218, tel.: (410) 243-2471. Newsstand Distribution: Ingram Pe- riodicals, 1240 Heil Quaker Blvd., P.O. Box 8000, La Vergne, TN 37086; tel. 800.627.6247; tel (718) 875-5491; Disticor Direct, 695 Westney Road South, Suite 14, Ajax, ON L1S 6M9, Canada, (800) 668-7724 or (905) 619-6565; Central Books, 99 Wallis Road, London E9 5LN, England. Annual subscriptions: U.S.A. and Canada–$39; students, seniors, and low income–$29; other foreign–us$47; foreign students, seniors, and low income–us$37. Libraries and institutions please e-mail [email protected]. Copyright ©2019 by Monthly Review Foundation. 64 (continued from inside back cover) In the final sentences of The Modern World-System in 1974, Wallerstein wrote: “The mark of the modern world is the imagination of its profiteers and the counter-assertiveness of the oppressed. Exploitation and the refusal to accept ex- ploitation as either inevitable or just constitute the continuing antinomy of the modern era, joined together in a dialectic which has far from reached its climax in the twentieth century.” ~ William (Bill) Edwin Foster, a longtime MR friend and supporter, father of MR editor John Bellamy Foster, died on September 1, 2019. Foster was a member of the Civilian Conservation Corps during the New Deal. He joined the U.S. Navy during the Second World War and served as a pharmacist’s mate in the Pacific. He graduated with a BA from the University of Washington and later became a school- teacher, medical adjudicator, and a used-bookstore owner, founder of Orca Books in Olympia, Washington. A lifelong socialist, he supported Henry Wallace for pres- ident in the 1948 elections. He often remarked on the termination of three profes- sors at the University of Washington in 1948, during the McCarthyite witch hunt, for refusing to say if they had or had not ever been members of the Communist Party and not signing loyalty oaths. Paul Sweezy, soon to cofound MR with Leo Huberman, had provided testimony in favor of the professors. Foster eventually became a strong supporter of Monthly Review. One of his fondest memories was meeting Sweezy and Harry Magdoff in New York in 1985. He spent his last years reading the magazine from cover to cover each month, engaging with the big ideas and doing research for MR Online, providing numerous postings for Editors’ News Wire. He was especially concerned with issues of U.S. imperial- ism, nuclear armaments, and climate change. In 2016, at age 95, he traveled alone to a talk by Bernie Sanders in Springfield, Oregon, waited for hours in line, and managed to get a seat near the front. In one of his very last statements, he said that Monthly Review had proven that it is possible to hold out for the truth and that it needed to continue its work. He will be greatly missed. ~ We were pleased to read the editorial note celebrating our seventieth anniver- sary in the latest issue of Capitalism Nature (vol. 30, no. 2). We republish it here to commemorate our many decades of work and to extend our thanks for the well-wishes: We would like to congratulate the Monthly Review Editors on occasion of the sev- entieth anniversary of that eminent journal. Since 1949, Monthly Review stands as a beacon of politically engaged Marxism in North America and beyond. Its importance to building the intellectual framework for socialism cannot be overestimated. Over the decades many of us have gained much insight by im- mersing ourselves in the journal’s pages. We are particularly grateful to John Bellamy Foster for bringing environmental concerns to greater prominence within the journal and thereby to a larger socialist audience. The indefatiga- bility of the Monthly Review Editors in developing and diffusing socialist ideas, through all sorts of media, is truly breathtaking. We would therefore like to join Monthly Review in celebrating the anniversary and we wish the journal many happy returns.