100 Nearby Colleges and Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
DOCUMONTRIMINI ED 031 994 HE 001 044 New York College Bound Corporation andCollege Bound Program. Annual Report 19671969. New York City Board of Education.Brooklyn. College Bound Program» New YorkCollege Bound Corp, N.Y. Pub Date Apr 69 Note-43p. ERRS Price MF 3025 HC 3225 Descriptors -*College Bound Students. *College HighSchool Cooperation. College Preparation.*Compensatory Education. *Disadvantaged Youth. *EducafionalOpportunities. Higher Education. High School Students The New York City Board ofEducation's College Pound Program wasestablished in 1967 to prepare deprivedhigh school students for eventualcollege entrance. By 1968 the program had enrolled6.000 students from 26 high schools toreceive special assistance intheir academic work. Almost100 nearby colleges and universities have workeddosely with the high schoolsby providing tutorial help. pre-admission counseling. dassroomassistance. and by conducting campustours and other activities. Thefirst class will be ready for admission intocollege in September. 1970. The New York CollegeBound Corporation (NYCBC) is a consortiumof primarily northeastern colleges and universities.the New York City publicschool system. the New York and Brooldyn diocesanschool systems. and Aspira.Inc. (in behalf of severely disadvantagedstudents). NYCBC's principalfunction is the placement of all successful graduates of theCollege Bound (CB) program in memberinstitutions. all of which have agreed not only toadmit CB students but toprovide them with financial aid and supplementarycounseling_and/or instruction when necessary.This first annual report of the NYCBC andthe CB program covers theactivities of the 2 groups between 1967 and 1968.(*1) Ol/gese . .-4 teN c) c:3 Annul Report La 1967-1968 NEW YORK COLLEGE BOUND CORPORATION A consortium of colleges, universities and COLLEGE BOUND PROGRAM Title I ESEA Board of Education of the City of New York EDUCATION aWELFARE U.S. DEPARTMENTOF HEM, OFFICE OFEDUCATION AS RECEIVEDFROM THE REPRODUCED EXACTLY THIS DOCUMENTHAS BEEN MINATO IT.POINTS Of VIEW02 OPINIONS PERSON OR016ANIZAHON OffKE OFEDUCATION NECESSARILY REPRESENTOF STATED DO NOT POSITION 01 POLICY. Table of Contents Page Introduction to the Annual Report 1 Report of the NYCBC . 3 Member Colleges and Universities . 4 The Corporation Central Office . 6 The Corporation Board of Directors 8 Report of the College Bound Program. 9 Introduction to the Program 10 Achievement Test Results 12 Scholastic Results 14 Comparison with Control Group 17 Differences among Schools 19 Curriculum Innovations 20 The Guidance Program . 21 Work of the Family Assistants 25 The Cultural Program 26 The College Bound Program Central Office 29 The Summer Session 30 Conclusion 36 Appendices Consortium Members . 38 Corporation Office Staff . 40 Corporation Board of Directors 40 Corporation Financial Report . 41 College Bound Program Staff 42 Board of Education 43 College Bound High Schools 44 Letter of Transmittal TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF EDUCATION AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF SCHOOLS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE NEW YORK COLLEGE BOUND CORPORATION Ladies and Gentlemen: We are happy to send you herewith the first Annual Report of theNew York City Board of Education's College Bound Program and the NewYork College Bound Corporation. It must be evident from the facts, and from the relative lengthof the two sec- tions of this report, that by far the greatest burden of thework of the New York College Bound Corporation and the College Bound Programis falling today on the secondary schools. This is where the students are now; this iswhere the largest amount of money is being spent now;and this is what the largest body of the report deals with. However, thecollege members will shortly be called upon to carry their part of the expenseand effort, and the report will reflect this change. In any event, the program is so full of hope for so many youngpeople, and the product of the first research done by the American Institute forResearch in the Behavioral Sciences (contracted for by the U.S. Office of Education)has been so favorable, (i.e. College Bound Program was among the 21 most exemplary programs in over 1000 compensatory education programs for the disadvantagedwhich were studied) that both writers of this letter of transmittal areheartened. Here is a pro- gram of enormous potential, a programthat will realize that potential in academic achievement. Respectfully submitted, HENRY T. HILLSON Director College Bound Program New York City Board of Education RICHARD L PLAUT President New York College Bound Corporation Introduction To The Annual Report This is a report of the first year'sactivities ( July 1, compensatory education thus far conceived, aid at an 1967 to June 30, 1968) of the New York College additional cost of $1,250 per student per year. In Sep- Bound Corporation (NYcBc), alreadyknown, to those tember 1968 an additional 2,500 9th and 10th graders with a passion for unnatural acronyms, as"Nicbick". It were put into the prograth in 26 highschools bringing seems indicated, at least inthis first report, to explain the total allocation to $6,000,000. Mr. Henry T. Hill- why there is aNYCBCand what it is doing and proposes son, principal of the George WashingtonHigh School to do. during the time of the highly successful Demonstration NYCBCis a consortium of, primarily northeastern, col- Guidance Project, is director of the Board of Education's leges and universities, the New York City public school College Bound Program. system, the New York andBrooklyn diocesan school 2. The institutions of higher education, ( first 43 in systems, and Aspira, Inc. in behalf of severelydisadvan- Greater New York, later expanded to over 100 in New taged, largely minority group students. York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Maine, Maryland, Colorado and Oregon ) Why? agreed to accept and give needed financial aid to stu- dents of their own selection, who complete the program It came into being as a result of the conjunction of successfully. three phenomena: 3. Mr. Richard L Plaut agreed to head, at first part 1. The notice taken by one of the writers of this re- time and without salary, a central office staff to care for port (then President of NationalScholarship and Fund the corporate affairs ofNYCBCbut primarily to serve as for Negro Students) of the establishment of a College liaison between the colleges and the high schools. This Bound Corporation in Philadelphia (already far sur- Central Office staff was to and does consist of profes- passed in size and complexity by the New York organi- sional specialists in school-college transition with the zation ). goal of seeing that each student completing the program 2. The acute awareness of the NewYork City Board successfully, has a chance to go to college. On June 1, of Education and its professional staff of the plight of the 1968, he retired as President ofNSSFNSand became the academic high school in the City. Only a small percent- full time director of the Central Office; then as execu- age, growing smaller each year,of students in these tive vice chairman ofNYCBC,and now as President of schools was graduating with academicdiplomas; even NYCBC. fewer were going on to college. The above three commitments now constitute the 3. The recognition by many colleges anduniversities three elements of the program ofNYCBC:First the Col- all over the country that they must do morefor disad- lege Bound program of the New York City Board of vantaged students. education, secondly the activities of the colleges and uni- What? versities, and third, the Ceatral Office activities. It is with the first year of these three elements of theNYCBCpro- Representatives of the above groups started to meet gram that this report willdeal. in small groups commencing in the fall of1966 and through that fall and winter in ever-widening numbers. Financing These meetings resulted, by the spring of 1967, in the formation ofNYCBCwith the folloviAng commitments The College Bound program in the Board of Educa- from each of the three elements. tion is financed, as stated, by federal funds. 1. The New York City Board of Education appropri- The colleges' contributions will consist largely of stu- ated, for the first year, $3,350,000 of funds from Title dent financial aid, although there will be some special Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. These programs. The financial aid will comefrom federal and funds were to be used in the 1967-68 school year to give state, as well as the colleges' ownfunds. 3,000 9th and 10th graders, identified in24 academic The Central Office program is financed by private high schools, the most extravagant, in-depth programof foundation and corporate grants. 1 Report of the NYCBC Member Colleges and Universities Given the primary focus of the College Bound pro- Although the high school College Bound coordinators gram the preparation of deprived youngsters for even- were prepared to receive assistance from their affiliates tual college entrance the active participation of con- shortly after opening of school in September 1967, final cerned institutions of higher education is vital. By agree- arrangements were not completed nor approved until ing to provide admission and appropriate financial aid late October. As a result, affiliation activities were some- to successful graduates of the program, the member col- what limited in the fall and early winter months. Sev- leges of NYCBC are providing the tangible goal toward eral campus visits and tours took place, however, and which these students are laboring. small numbers of tutors were made available by some Since the first College Bound students will not be colleges to some schools. Groundwork was being laid, ready for college until September 1970, nor the first full- and meetings took place between institutional represent- sized group until 1971, the contacts arranged between atives. By February, the tempo of exchange increased. the member colleges and the schools in this initial year It was by then obvious that the activities of greatest of operation were necessarily of a modest nature.