Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan for Mongolia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan for Mongolia BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR MONGOLIA Ulaanbaatar April 1996 PREFACE by Dr. Z. Batjargal, Minister for Nature and the Environment Biodixersity conservation is one of Mongolia's priority issues. Biodiversity conservation requires more than just the traditional classic way of nature protection, which is important but responds to only part of the need. Conservation must be integrated into development which must be sustainable and compatible with the survival of living nature. Most of Mongolia's area is still pristine and its biodiversity is relatively little influenced by human activities, due to low population density and less developed industry. But Mongolia has an extreme continental climate, and its ecosystems are rather fragile and sensitive to unnatural pressure from human activities. To conserve biodiversity the government has been following a policy of protecting ecosystems, threatened species and species of economic importance. To date this has been done through appropriate management, habitat protection of species such as snow leopard and saiga and some species of plants, and preserving the gene pool of threatened species such as gobi bear and wild camel by restoring breeding populations. Another important effort is the reintroduction of the Przewalskii horse, which is extinct in the wild. The government has achieved some positive results. Many remaining issues will be solved through improved enforcement of environmental laws, economic incentives to protect the environment, combining of traditional and modem conservation methods, and increased public concern for biodiversity. In order to conserve Mongolia's biodiversity, ecological training is required for scientists and decision makers and certain advanced technologies are needed. This requires much more funding than the Mongolian government or even the entire nation' can provide. Therefore, the government, in coordination with UNDP, and with the financial support of GEF, developed the Biodiversity Project with the aim of protecting biodiversity. The implementation of its first phase is nearing completion with good success. This Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan was developed within the framework of the Biodiversity Project with assistance from experienced foreign specialists and Mongolian scientists. The Plan's concept was discussed with many representatives from governmental and non-governmental organizations. Mongolia is a large country with rich and unique biodiversity, but its economic base is small compared to many countries. For example, although Mongolia's territory is three times greater than France's, her per capita GDP is fifteen times smaller. For this reason and because the Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan is intended to solve both national and global biodiversity conservation problems, its iii implementation requires incremental Cost support from the GEF. Consequently, the Implementation Phase 2 has been developed. But it can not cover the cost completely. Therefore the establishment of a Trust Fund is needed in order to provide sufficient and sustainable support for critically needed actions identified in this document. If the latter projects and planned actions can be implemented, it will not only rescue the regional and global biodiversity from loss by saving the very rare species that are lef_ in Mongolia's territory, but it will effect the restoration of species in neighboring countries as well. It will provide a possibility to save habitat and species, which will be a great charity for the entire human race. Mongolia's government and the people are willing to make such a contribution. However, appropriate support is needed from the international community. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface, by Dr. Z. Batjargal, Minister for Nature and the Environment iii List of Tables ix List of Figures x List of Appendices x List of Acronyms, Terms, and Organizations xi Biodiversity Conservation Action Plan Process in Mongolia xiii INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 1 THE STATUS OF MONGOLIAN BIODIVERSITY 5 1.1 Overview of biological diversity in Mongolia 5 1.1.1 Ecosystem diversity .................. 6 1.1.1.1 Natural diversity ................ 6 1.1.1.2 Anthropogenic diversity ................ 9 1.1.2 Species diversity ................... 12 1.1.3 Genetic diversity ................... 14 1.1.3.1 Wild animals and plants ................ 14 1.1.3.2 Domestic animals and plants .... ........ 15 1.1.4 Special features of Mongolia's biodiversity ......... 15 1.1.4.1 Ecological and evolutionary features . ....... 16 1.1.4.2 Species endemism .................. 17 1.1.4.3 Endangered species .................. 18 1.1.4.4 Economically important wild species .......... 19 1.1.4.5 Regional and global importance of Mongolia's biodiversity . 19 1.2 Threatened status of biodiversity 20 1.2.1 The threats ................... 20 1.2.1.1 Ecosystems .................. 20 1.2.1.2 Species ...................... 21 1.2.1.3 Genetic varieties .................. 21 1.2.2 Causes of threats ................... 22 1.2.2.1 Population increases ................. 22 1.2.2.2 Industrialization, past and present economic policies, and pollution 22 1.2.2.3 Increase in per capita consumption of resources ....... 24 1.2.2.4 Destruction of habitat ..... 25 1.2.2.5 Over-exploitation ............... 26 1.2.2.6 Inadequate natural resource management ......... 27 1.2.2.7 Threats from outside national borders ......... 28 1.2.2.8 Climate change ............... 29 1.2.3 Need for sustainable development of resources 29 CHAPTER 2 STATUS OF CONSERVATION IN MONGOLIA 31 2.1 Description and assessment of conservation in the wild . 31 2.1.1 Protected areas ................ 31 2.1.1.1 History of establishment ............. 31 2.1.1.2 Numbers of different types of protected areas ....... 32 2.1.1.3 Legal status ................... 40 2.1.1.4 Protected area zonation ................ 41 2.1.1.5 Buffer zones around protected areas ..... · ...... 42 2.1.1.6 Management, staff and budgets ............. 42 2.1.1.7 Research and monitoring ................ 43 2.1.1.8 Enforcement of laws and regulations . , . : ....... 44 2.1.1.9 Community support ................. 45 2.1.1.10 Ecotourism .................... 45 2.1.2 Conservation of wild species ............. 46 2.1.2.1 Legal status .................... 47 2.1.2.2 Administration ................... 51 2.1.2.3 State Inspectors and Rangers ............. 51 2.1.2.4 Enforcement of laws and regulations ............ 52 2.1.2.5 Community support ................. 52 2,1.2.6 Protection of species with ranges crossing international borders 52 2.1.3 Conservation outside protected areas .......... 53 2.1.3.1 Soil conservation and agriculture . .. ......... 53 2,1.3,2 Range management ................. 53 2.1.3.3 Forest management ................. 54 2.1.3.4 Restoration of disturbed and damaged lands . .' ..... 55 2.2 Description and assessment of other conservation actions 55 2.2.1 Conservation of wild plants in botanical gardens 55 2.2.2 Conservation of wild animals in captive collections 56 2.2.3 Conservation of wild relatives of crops and livestock 56 2.2.4 Conservation of varieties of crops, livestock and domestic animals .................. 56 2.2.5 , Pollution control ................ 57 2.3 Assessment of availability of data and scientific research necessary to achieve biodiversity conservation . 58 2.3.1 Inventory and baseline data ............. 58 2.3.2 Monitoring ..................... 59 - 2.4 Assessment of institutional' framework ...... 59 2.4.1 Government - central ................. 59 2.4.2 Government - local ................. 61 2.4.3 Private - non-governmental Mongolian organizations 62 2.4.4 Private - for profit .................. 62 2.5 Assessment of law and policy ........ 63 2.5.1 Legislation: laws, regulations, resolutions, conflicts ..... 63 2.5.2 Strategy ..................... 64 2.6 Assessment of public information and education programs related to biodiversity conservation .... 65 · 2.6.1 Formal education: schools, colleges, universities. 65 2.6.2 Books, magazines, newspapers, TV, radio ........ 66 2.7 Assessment of personnel training for biodiversity conservation 67 2.8 Description and assessment of international cooperation on * biodiversity conservation 67 2.8.1 Multilateral cooperation 67 2.8.2 Bilateral cooperation ................ 68 2.8.3 Non-governmental Cooperation ............ 69 CHAPTER 3 ACTION PROGRAMS 71 3.1 Overall objectives ........... 71 · 71 3 2 Specific objectives and actions 3.2.1 Establish complete protected area system representative of all ecosystems and protecting endangered 'species, including joint actions with the Russian Federation and the People's Republic of China ................. ...... 71 3.2.2 Establish effective population control measures to limit human impact on the nation's biodiversity ............. 80 3.2.3 Implement an effective environmental impact assessment program to understand the effects of proposed actions on biodiversity. 81 3.2.4 Establish a research program that improves knowledge of biodiversity and relevant threats . ........... 83 3.2.5 Establish a nationwide information and monitoring system for biodiversity conservation ............... 84 3·2.6 Establish national education and training programs for biodiversity conservation ............... 85 3·2.7 Establish a public information program to improve people's knowledge of biodiversity and the importance of conserving it.. 86 3.2.8 Control pollution of air, water and soil .......... 87 3·2.9 Control hunting and fishing .............. 88 3.2.10 Prevent
Recommended publications
  • Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut Naturelles De Belgique Voor Natuurwetenschappen
    Institut royal des Sciences Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut naturelles de Belgique voor Natuurwetenschappen BULLETIN MEDEDELINGEN Tome XXXIII, n» 3 Deel XXXIII, nr 3 Bruxelles, janvier 1957. Brussel, januari 1957. ANALYSE DU POTENTIEL MORPHOLOGIQUE ET PROJET DE CLASSIFICATION DES COLUMBIFORMES (WETMORE 1934), par René Verheyen (Bruxelles). Si l'on prend comme critères le nombre de projets de classification soumis à l'appréciation des systématiciens, l'importance et la variété des études anatomiques comparées ainsi que la périodicité des « révisions » faites à la lumière des plus récentes découvertes, on constate que les Columbiformes n'ont guère intéressé les ornithologues. Dès l'aurore de la Systématique moderne, les Gangas et les Pigeons apparaissent, dans les Classifications, soit sous forme d'ordines jumelés, soit associés dans le même ordo. Aussi la systématique de base des Columbae, sauf modifi¬ cations mineures, semble se caractériser par une stabilité rigoureuse. Rap¬ pelons-nous que la Classification proposée par Sharpe (1891) et Salvadori (1893) est fondée sur la configuration du bec, l'aspect que présente la podothèque, la formule alaire, la longueur relative des tarses et de la queue, ainsi que sur la coloration générale et la présence d'en¬ sembles décoratifs dans le plumage comme seuls critères taxonomiques. Il faut croire que leur recueil de tables dichotomiques a largement suffi aux systématiciens de notre époque, malgré l'avis éclairé de Fürbringer (1902, p. 681) que « ein gutes, natürliches System der Columbidae ist noch Desiderat » et malgré la contribution importante apportée à l'ostéo- logie des Pigeons par Martin qui, en 1904 déjà, résuma l'état des recherches de notre époque de la manière suivante : « Die vergleichend anatomische Behandlung der Tauben ist verhâltnissmâssig neu und deshalb noch wenig weit gediehen.
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport of Water by Adult Sandgrouse to Their Young Tom J
    THE CONDOR VOLUME69 JULY-AUGUST,1967 NUMBER4 TRANSPORT OF WATER BY ADULT SANDGROUSE TO THEIR YOUNG TOM J. CADE and GORDONL. MACLEAN In 1896 the English aviculturist Meade-Waldo published an astonishing and seemingly incredible account of how the males of sandgrouse that he successfully bred in captivity carried water to their young in their breast feathers. To quote from his original report: As soon as the young were out of the nest (when twelve hours old) a very curious habit developed itself in the male. He would rub his breast violently up and down on the ground, a motion quite distinct from dusting, and when all awry he would get into his drinking water and saturate the feathers of the under parts. When soaked he would go through the motions of flying away, nodding his head, etc. Then, remembering his family were close by, would run up to the hen, make a demonstration, when the young would run out, get under him, and suckthe water from his breast. This is no doubt the way that water is conveyed to the young when far out on waterless plains. The young . are very independent, eating hard seed and weeds from the first, and roosting independently of their parents at ten days old (Meade-Waldo, 1896). See also Meade- Waldo (1921). Despite the fact that .Meade-Waldo (1897 ; 1921) observed 61 broods from three different species of sandgrouse hatched in his aviaries between 189.5 and l915, and soon received confirmation from another breeder for two species (St. Quintin, 1905), and despite the fact that field naturalists and native hunters have frequently observed wild male sandgrouse wetting their breast feathers at water holes in the way described (Meade-Waldo, 1906; Buxton, 1923; Heim de Balsac, 1936; Hoesch, 1955), the idea that the young do receive water in this exceptional way has met with a great deal of scepticism (Archer and Godman, 1937; Meinertzhagen, 1954, 1964; Hiie and Etchkcopar, 1957; Schmidt-Nielsen, 1964).
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan
    NEPA Biodiversity Profile of Afghanistan An Output of the National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environment Management (NCSA) for Afghanistan June 2008 United Nations Environment Programme Post-Conflict and Disaster Management Branch First published in Kabul in 2008 by the United Nations Environment Programme. Copyright © 2008, United Nations Environment Programme. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. United Nations Environment Programme Darulaman Kabul, Afghanistan Tel: +93 (0)799 382 571 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www.unep.org DISCLAIMER The contents of this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of UNEP, or contributory organizations. The designations employed and the presentations do not imply the expressions of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP or contributory organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or its authority, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Unless otherwise credited, all the photos in this publication have been taken by the UNEP staff. Design and Layout: Rachel Dolores
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Tree of Birds
    HANDBOOK OF BIRD BIOLOGY THE CORNELL LAB OF ORNITHOLOGY HANDBOOK OF BIRD BIOLOGY THIRD EDITION EDITED BY Irby J. Lovette John W. Fitzpatrick Editorial Team Rebecca M. Brunner, Developmental Editor Alexandra Class Freeman, Art Program Editor Myrah A. Bridwell, Permissions Editor Mya E. Thompson, Online Content Director iv This third edition first published 2016 © 2016, 2004, 1972 by Cornell University Edition history: Cornell Laboratory of Ornithology (1e, 1972); Princeton University Press (2e, 2004) Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Editorial Offices 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030‐5774, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley‐blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Sandgrouserefs Ver1.0.Pdf
    Introduction I have endeavoured to keep typos, errors, omissions etc in this list to a minimum, however when you find more I would be grateful if you could mail the details during 2016 & 2017 to: [email protected]. Please note that this and other Reference Lists I have compiled are not exhaustive and are best employed in conjunction with other sources. Grateful thanks to Killian Mullarney for the cover images. All images © the photographer. Joe Hobbs Index The general order of species follows the International Ornithologists' Union World Bird List (Gill, F. & Donsker, D. (eds.) 2016. IOC World Bird List. Available from: http://www.worldbirdnames.org/ [version 6.1 accessed February 2016]). Version Version 1.0 (May 2016). Cover Main image: Chestnut-bellied and Spotted Sandgrouse. Near Thumrayt, Oman. 3rd November 2008. Picture by Killian Mullarney. Vignette: Spotted Sandgrouse. Near Thumrayt, Oman. 3rd November 2008. Picture by Killian Mullarney. Species Page No. Black-bellied Sandgrouse [Pterocles orientalis] 6 Black-faced Sandgrouse [Pterocles decoratus] 8 Burchell's Sandgrouse [Pterocles burchelli] 10 Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse [Pterocles exustus] 5 Crowned Sandgrouse [Pterocles coronatus] 8 Double-banded Sandgrouse [Pterocles bicinctus] 9 Four-banded Sandgrouse [Pterocles quadricinctus] 9 Lichtenstein's Sandgrouse [Pterocles lichtensteinii] 8 Madagascar Sandgrouse [Pterocles personatus] 8 Namaqua Sandgrouse [Pterocles namaqua] 4 Painted Sandgrouse [Pterocles indicus] 9 Pallas's Sandgrouse [Syrrhaptes paradoxus] 3 Pin-tailed Sandgrouse [Pterocles alchata] 3 Spotted Sandgrouse [Pterocles senegallus] 6 Tibetan Sandgrouse [Syrrhaptes tibetanus] 2 Yellow-throated Sandgrouse [Pterocles gutturalis] 7 1 Relevant Publications Beaman, M. 1994. Palearctic birds: a checklist of the birds of Europe, North Africa and Asia north of the foothills of the Himalayas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Ecology of the Namaqua Sandgrouse and Other Arid-Zone Birds
    A STUDY OF THE ECOLOGY OF THE NAMAQUA SANDGROUSE AND OTHER ARID-ZONE BIRDS PENN LLOYD Thesis Presented for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Percy Fitzpatrick I nstitute of African Ornithology UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN February 1998' The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. "Part of facing up to the realities and complexity of nature is admilting that any approach we take will be incomplete, imperfect. provisional, experimental. The important thing is 10 try: Stephen Budiansky in Nature's Keepers And here I Iry I dedicate this thesis to my mother COLLEEN LLOYD for her many sacrifices to ensure my first-class education. and to DEKKER and SIKKIE STADLER whose hospitality and support kept me sane and made much of this study possible. I TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACf ........................................................................................................................................................... ] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................................................. 0 CHAPTERl GENERAL INTRODUCfION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification File for Sandgrouse
    • The following pages have some identification markers for each of the Sandgrouses found in India • To know more on these birds you can visit http://ogaclicks.com/sandgrouse/ • If you are interested in Coming on any of my tours or workshops please share your email id. I will keep you updated • Mail me at [email protected] • You can also call me on (91)9840119078 , (91) 9445219078 (91) 6369815812 List of Sandgrouse found in India Sno. Name Binomial Name 1 Black-bellied Sandgrouse Pterocles orientalis 2 Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse Pterocles exustus 3 Painted Sandgrouse Pterocles indicus 4 Palla's Sandgrouse Syrrhaptes paradoxus 5 Pin-tailed Sandgrouse Pterocles Alchata 6 Spotted Sandgrouse Pterocles senegallus 7 Tibetan Sandgrouse Pterocles tibetanus ©www.ogaclicks.com Black-bellied Sandgrouse Identification Tips Black-bellied Sandgrouse : Pterocles orientalis: Winter visitor to North West India Grey Head Upperparts are golden-brown with darker markings Bill is grey to black-horn Black chin Chestnut throat Grey Breast Male Thin black border around the lower breast Blackish grey legs Black belly Brown, finely marked head Brown, finely marked upperparts Yellow throat Female Brown, finely marked breast Difference from male Reference : Birds of Indian Subcontinent Inskipp and Grimmett ©www.ogaclicks.com White patch on lower breast Important id point www.HBW.com Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse Identification Tips Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse: Pterocles exustus: Widespread resident in India ( Except Himalayas, East & North East) Bill is slate blue
    [Show full text]
  • Dissemination of Plants by Birds
    May 17, 1888] NATURE 53 phyllere-Polycarpere, and nearly retated to the Andine genus Reports of the Geological Survey of New Zealand. Pycnophy!lmn, and the North Mexican genus Cerdia. THE issue of an index to the Reports of the Geological To my mind there are other difficulties in the way of such a Survey of New Zealand, from 1866 to 1885 inclusive, derivation of this insular vegetation as that suggested by Dr. enables us to see at a glance how large an amount of Guppy, but I will not enter into them here, as it would occupy valuable material has been accumulated by the staff of too much space. W, BOTTING HEMSLEY, this Survey, under its accomplished and energetic Direc­ tor, Sir James Hector. Several editions of the useful On the Reappearance of Pallas's Sand Grouse geological map of the colony have appeared, the latest (Syn-haptes paradoxus) in Europe. dated 1885; and the volumes containing the yearly THIS bird suddenly reappeared at the end of April of this year reports of progress are now eighteen in number. Mono­ at different localities of Central Europe, not having migrated so graphs on the palreontology of New Zealand are stated to far since 1863. A. R. Wallace, in his important work, "The be in preparation, and there are, besides these, museum Geographical Distribution of Animals," published in 1876, and laboratory reports, meteorological returns, and mis­ figured this sand grouse among the characteristic birds of Mon· cellaneous publications. The difficulties felt in correlating golia (vol. i. p. 226, plate 3), and remarks:-" A curious the strata of so isolated an area as New Zealand with the bird, whose native country seems to be the high plains of rocks of other districts must always be very great, and Northern Asia, but which often abounds near Pekin, and in it is therefore not surprising to find that warm and ani­ 1863 astonished European ornithologists by app!aring in con­ mated discussions are taking place among the different siderable numbers in Central and 'Vestern Europe, in every part of Great Britain, and even in Ireland." Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Ministry of Environmental Protection
    Republic of Kazakhstan Ministry of Environmental protection THE FOURTH NATIONAL REPORT ON PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CONVENTION ON BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN ASTANA, 2009 Content Chapter I - Overview of Biodiversity Status, Trends and Threats 3 Chapter II - Current Status of National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans 19 Chapter III - Sectoral and cross-sectoral integration or mainstreaming of biodiversity Considerations 28 Chapter IV - Conclusions: Progress Towards the 2010 Target and Implementation of the Strategic Plan 46 Appendix I - Information concerning reporting Party and preparation of national report 76 Appendix II - Further sources of information 77 Appendix III - Progress towards Targets of the Global Strategy for Plant Conservation and Programme of Work on Protected Areas 78 Appendix IV - National indicators used in the report (optional) 91 2 Chapter I - Overview of Biodiversity Status, Trends and Threats Republic of Kazakhstan is situated in the depth of Euroasian continent, it takes central and south latitudes of a temperate zone from 55°26' n.l. to 40°59' n.l. and from 46°05' to 87°03' e.l. Length of the territory of the country – 1600 km from the north to the south and 3000km from the west to the east, the area is 2,7 million km 2. The territory of Kazakhstan has a unique set of landscapes: from deserts to mountains and ecosystems of inland seas. Dry and sub-humid lands occupy more than 75% of the territory of the Republic of Kazakhstan. They concentrate more than 40% of the species composition of all biological diversity. In the face of increasing speed of economic development of the country and enhancement of the use of natural resources the issue on further improvement of the territorial nature protection system is becoming important.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 §4-71-6.5 List of Restricted Animals [ ] Part A: For
    §4-71-6.5 LIST OF RESTRICTED ANIMALS [ ] PART A: FOR RESEARCH AND EXHIBITION SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME INVERTEBRATES PHYLUM Annelida CLASS Hirudinea ORDER Gnathobdellida FAMILY Hirudinidae Hirudo medicinalis leech, medicinal ORDER Rhynchobdellae FAMILY Glossiphoniidae Helobdella triserialis leech, small snail CLASS Oligochaeta ORDER Haplotaxida FAMILY Euchytraeidae Enchytraeidae (all species in worm, white family) FAMILY Eudrilidae Helodrilus foetidus earthworm FAMILY Lumbricidae Lumbricus terrestris earthworm Allophora (all species in genus) earthworm CLASS Polychaeta ORDER Phyllodocida FAMILY Nereidae Nereis japonica lugworm PHYLUM Arthropoda CLASS Arachnida ORDER Acari FAMILY Phytoseiidae 1 RESTRICTED ANIMAL LIST (Part A) §4-71-6.5 SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME Iphiseius degenerans predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus longipes predator, spider mite Mesoseiulus macropilis predator, spider mite Neoseiulus californicus predator, spider mite Neoseiulus longispinosus predator, spider mite Typhlodromus occidentalis mite, western predatory FAMILY Tetranychidae Tetranychus lintearius biocontrol agent, gorse CLASS Crustacea ORDER Amphipoda FAMILY Hyalidae Parhyale hawaiensis amphipod, marine ORDER Anomura FAMILY Porcellanidae Petrolisthes cabrolloi crab, porcelain Petrolisthes cinctipes crab, porcelain Petrolisthes elongatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes eriomerus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes gracilis crab, porcelain Petrolisthes granulosus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes japonicus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes laevigatus crab, porcelain Petrolisthes
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 273 the AMERICAN Museum of NATURAL HISTORY Sept
    AMERICAN MUSEUM NOVITATES Published by Number 273 THE AMERICAN MusEum oF NATURAL HISTORY Sept. 6, 1927 New York City * 59.86,5P REMARKS ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF THE PTEROCLIDIDE BY W. WEDGWOOD BOWEN The family Pteroclididae, an Old World group of birds commonly known as Sandgrouse, contains sixteen species, ten of which inhabit Africa. Three genera, Syrrhaptes, Pterocles, and Eremialector, are usually recognized, though the validity of the last named is sometimes questioned. Syrrhaptes contains but two species, and is readily distin- guished from all other members of the family owing to the peculiar nature of its foot, which is feathered to the tips of the toes, lacks a hallux, and has the three front toes united to form a "pad" below. This, together with some osteological peculiarities which need not be considered here, fully justifies its generic distinction and, except in so far as affinities are indicated with other sandgrouse, attention in this study will be focused entirely on the remaining fourteen species of the family. A field acquaintance with five species, senegallus, senegalensis, coronatus, -lichtensteinii, and quadricinctus, gained during a residence of five years in the northern Sudan has convinced me that the elongation of the central pair of rectrices, the character used to distinguish th.e genera Pterocles and Eremialector, is not only insufficient but leads actually to an unnatural division; nevertheless, in their habits, especially in relation to drinking, these birds fall naturally into two groups and this is well known to anyone who is familiar with them in life. Of the five Sudan species, three are typically diurnal and come to drink with clockwork-like regularity each morning between the hours of seven and nine, after which they return far out into the desert to lie up during the heat of the day.
    [Show full text]