Ecology Assessment Report Griffin 1AB78

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecology Assessment Report Griffin 1AB78 Ecology Assessment Report Lot 1 AB78 Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific Liquefied Natural Gas (Australia Pacific LNG) Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action Should indicates a recommended course of action May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Team Leader. Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-1027 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 45 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 1 AB78 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 5 1.1. Scope of Works ............................................................................................. 5 1.1.1. Ecological Assessment Field Survey Methodology .................................................... 5 1.2. Definitions & Abbreviations .............................................................................. 9 1.2.1. Definitions ................................................................................................. 9 1.2.2. Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 9 1.2.3. Document References .................................................................................. 10 2. Site context .......................................................................................... 13 2.1. Bioregion .................................................................................................. 13 2.2. Land Use ...................................................................................................... 13 2.3. Soils and Geology ........................................................................................... 13 2.4. Climate ....................................................................................................... 14 2.5. Site Description ............................................................................................. 14 3. Methodology ......................................................................................... 14 3.1. Desktop and Literature Review ....................................................................... 14 3.2. Field Survey ............................................................................................... 15 3.2.1. Vegetation Community Survey ........................................................................ 15 3.2.2. Habitat Surveys .......................................................................................... 16 3.2.3. Threatened Flora and Fauna Survey .................................................................. 16 3.2.4. Exotic Flora and Fauna Survey ........................................................................ 17 3.2.5. Disturbance Survey ..................................................................................... 17 3.2.6. Survey Limitations ...................................................................................... 17 4. Results and Discussions ............................................................................. 18 4.1. Desktop and Literature Review ....................................................................... 18 4.1.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters .............................................................. 18 4.1.2. Queensland Environmental Matters .................................................................. 20 4.2. Field survey ............................................................................................... 22 4.2.1. Commonwealth Environmental Matters .............................................................. 23 4.2.2. Queensland environmental matters .................................................................. 28 4.2.3. Weeds and Pests ........................................................................................ 32 4.2.4. Watercourses and Wetland Ecosystems .............................................................. 32 4.2.5. Disturbance .............................................................................................. 33 5. Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................. 34 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-1027 Revision: 0 Page 3 of 45 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 1 AB78 6. Appendix A: Site Location and Survey Points ................................................... 35 7. Appendix B: EPBC Protected Matters Search Tool Results ................................... 36 8. Appendix C: Wildlife Online Database Search Results ......................................... 37 9. Appendix D: EHP Mapping of Environmentally Sensitive Areas ............................... 38 10. Appendix E: EHP Regional Ecosystems and High Value Regrowth Mapping ................. 39 11. Appendix F: EHP Wetlands and Watercourse Mapping ......................................... 40 12. Appendix G: Flora and Fauna Recorded During the Surveys .................................. 41 13. Appendix H: Potential EPBC Threatened Ecological Communities ........................... 42 14. Appendix I: Field Validated Regional Ecosystems and High Value Regrowth Mapping .... 43 15. Appendix J: Threatened Species Recorded During the Surveys .............................. 44 16. Appendix K: Declared Plants and Animals Recorded During the Surveys.................... 45 List of Tables Table 1: Definitions ................................................................................................. 9 Table 2: Abbreviations .............................................................................................. 9 Table 3: Associated Document References .................................................................... 10 Table 4: PMST results for threatened ecological communities potentially occurring on Site ........ 18 Table 5: PMST results for threatened species potentially occurring on Site ............................ 19 Table 6: Wildlife online search tool results for threatened species potentially occurring on Site .. 20 Table 7: Endangered REs mapped as potentially present on Site ......................................... 21 Table 8: No concern at present REs mapped as potentially present on Site ............................ 21 Table 9: HVR mapped as potentially present on Site ....................................................... 22 Table 10: Weeds and pest fauna potentially present on Site .............................................. 22 Table 11: Threatened ecological communities present or potentially present on Site based on field survey results ....................................................................................................... 23 Table 12: EPBC Act protected flora species’ potential to occur on Site. ................................ 24 Table 13: EPBC Act protected fauna species potentially present on Site ............................... 25 Table 14: NC Reg listed threatened flora potentially occurring on Site ................................. 28 Table 15: NC Reg listed threatened fauna species present or potentially present on Site ........... 29 Table 16: Endangered and of concern REs identified to be present on Site ............................ 30 Table 17: No concern at present REs identified to be present on Site ................................... 31 Table 18: Declared plants recorded during the ecological field survey on Site ........................ 32 Table 19: Declared animals identified during the ecological field survey on Site ..................... 32 Table 20: Disturbance type, age, severity and frequency of occurrence on the Site. ................ 33 Doc Ref: Q-4500-15-RP-1027 Revision: 0 Page 4 of 45 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Team, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report Lot 1 AB78 1. Introduction This report provides a description of the ecological values found within defined study areas within Lot 1 on AB78 (the Site). At the request of the client (and due to land holder access restrictions), the defined areas subject to the formal assessment were primarily restricted to locations corresponding to remnant vegetation polygons shown on the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection’s (EHP) regional ecosystem (RE) mapping. The results are based on an initial desktop assessment followed by a field survey to confirm the vegetation
Recommended publications
  • Mistletoes on Mmahgh J) Introduced Trees of the World Agriculture
    mmAHGH J) Mistletoes on Introduced Trees of the World Agriculture Handbook No. 469 Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture Mistletoes on Introduced Trees of the World by Frank G. Hawksworth Plant Pathologist Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station Agriculture Handbook No. 469 Forest Service U.S. Department of Agriculture December 1974 CONTENTS Page Introduction ^ Mistletoes and Hosts 3 Host Index of Mistletoes 27 Literature Cited ^^ Library of Congress Catalog No. 74-600182 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington B.C. 20402 Price 75 cents Stock Number 0100-03303 MISTLETOES ON INTRODUCED TREES OF THE WORLD INTRODUCTION Spaulding (1961) published the first attempt at a worldwide inven- tory of the diseases of foreign (introduced) trees of the world. With the widespread introduction of trees to many parts of the world, it is becoming of increasing importance to know the susceptibility of trees introduced to new disease situations. Spaulding's comprehensive lists included forest tree diseases caused by fungi, bacteria, and viruses, but not the mistletoes. Therefore this publication on the mistletoes was prepared to supplement his work. Spaulding considered only forest trees, but the coverage here is expanded to include mistletoes parasitic on introduced forest, crop, orchard, and ornamental trees. In some instances, mistletoes are reported on trees cultivated within different parts of a country where the tree is native. Such records are included if it is indicated in the publication that the mistletoe in question is on planted trees. "Mistletoe" as used in this paper refers to any member of the fam- ilies Loranthaceae or Viscaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Budawangia* an E-Newsletter for All Those Interested in the Native Plants of the Nsw South Coast
    BUDAWANGIA* AN E-NEWSLETTER FOR ALL THOSE INTERESTED IN THE NATIVE PLANTS OF THE NSW SOUTH COAST Contact: Dr Kevin Mills – [email protected] No. 28 - July 2014 Aims: To connect those interested in the native flora of the NSW South Coast, to share up to date information on the flora of the region and to broaden the appreciation of the region’s native plants. Editorial July, the middle of winter, is perhaps not the most inviting time to get out into the bush, windy and cold weather discouraging excursions too far from home. There is however much to see in the bush at this time of year. Many rainforest plants have fruit, the foggy highlands provide good opportunities for early morning photographs, while the winter-flowering Banksias are putting on a show on the foreshores and in the woodlands. This edition contains an article on mistletoes, those plants that parasitise other plants. These shrubs play an important role in the ecology of forests and woodlands and recent research has identified them as critical to the well being of many animal species. The purpose of „plant of the month‟ is to discuss some of the more uncommon species in our region. This month we have Acacia hispidula, an uncommon wattle of the sandstone country. As usual, another mystery weed is presented, along with an article about two noxious weeds in the genus Xanthium and another article in the series on wetland plants. I am glad readers are finding the newsletter enjoyable and informative; comments such as the following encourage me to keep it going: Les from Kangaroo Valley - “Thanks for a very interesting issue.” Diane from Nowra - “Thanks Kevin.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materialsupplementary Material
    Supplementary Materials 10.1071/RJ16076_AC © CSIRO 2017 Supplementary Material: Rangeland Journal, 2017, 39(1), 85–95. Assessing the invasion threat of non-native plant species in protected areas using Herbarium specimen and ecological survey data. A case study in two rangeland bioregions in Queensland Michael R. NgugiA,B and Victor John NeldnerA AQueensland Herbarium, Department of Science Information Technology and Innovation, Mt Coot- tha Road, Toowong, Qld 4066, Australia. BCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Table S1. List of native species in Cape York Peninsula and Desert Uplands bioregions Cape York Peninsula native Species Desert Uplands native Species Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus ficulneus Abelmoschus moschatus subsp. Tuberosus Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia ovata Abildgaardia vaginata Abildgaardia vaginata Abutilon arenarium Abrodictyum brassii Abutilon calliphyllum Abrodictyum obscurum Abutilon fraseri Abroma molle Abutilon hannii Abrophyllum ornans Abutilon leucopetalum Abrus precatorius L. subsp. precatorius Abutilon malvifolium Abutilon albescens Abutilon nobile Domin Abutilon auritum Abutilon otocarpum Abutilon micropetalum Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armillata Abutilon oxycarpum Acacia armitii Abutilon oxycarpum var. incanum Acacia aulacocarpa Abutilon oxycarpum var. subsagittatum Acacia auriculiformis Acacia acradenia Acacia brassii Acacia adsurgens Acacia calyculata Acacia aneura F.Muell. ex Benth. var. aneura Acacia celsa Acacia aneura var. major Pedley Acacia chisholmii Acacia angusta Maiden
    [Show full text]
  • A Regional Examination of the Mistletoe Host Species Inventory
    354 Cunninghamia 8(3): 2004 Downey, Examination of the mistletoe host inventory A regional examination of the mistletoe host species inventory Paul Owen Downey Centre for Plant Biodiversity Research, CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, AUSTRALIA. Present Address Institute of Conservation Biology, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522 AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Abstract: Downey (1998) collated an inventory of mistletoe host species based on herbaria records for every aerial mistletoe species (families Loranthaceae and Viscaceae) in Australia. In this paper the representative nature of those host lists is examined in an extensive field survey of mistletoes and their host species in south-eastern New South Wales (including Australian Capital Territory). Four new host species not in the 1998 inventory, and eight new mistletoe-host combinations (i.e. a previously recorded host but not for that particular mistletoe species) were collected. These new records were distributed throughout the survey area. Interestingly, these new host-mistletoe combinations were for mistletoe species that were well represented in the national inventory (i.e. with many herbarium collections and numerous host species). The initial inventory was incomplete, at least for south-eastern New South Wales, indicating the need for (i) more targeted surveys similar to this one, and/or (ii) regular updates of the host inventory based on voucher specimens. A possible reasons why information on host-mistletoe combinations is incomplete may be that such combinations may be dynamic (i.e. mistletoe species may be expanding their suite of potential hosts, either fortuitously or as result of evolutionary pressures).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology Assessment Report – 58RG128 Ecology Assessment Report
    Ecology Assessment Report – 58RG128 Ecology Assessment Report Release Notice This document is available through the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project controlled document system TeamBinder™. The responsibility for ensuring that printed copies remain valid rests with the user. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Third-party issue can be requested via the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project Document Control Group. Document Conventions The following terms in this document apply: • Will, shall or must indicate a mandatory course of action • Should indicates a recommended course of action • May or can indicate a possible course of action. Document Custodian The custodian of this document is the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager. The custodian is responsible for maintaining and controlling changes (additions and modifications) to this document and ensuring the stakeholders validate any changes made to this document. Deviations from Document Any deviation from this document must be approved by the Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Project – Environmental Approvals Manager Doc Ref: Q-4300-15-RP-1004 Revision: 0 Page 2 of 59 Approvals, Land and Stakeholder Relations, Australia Pacific LNG Upstream Phase 1 Uncontrolled when printed unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy. Ecology Assessment Report – 58RG128 Ecology Assessment Report Table of Contents 1. Definitions & abbreviations ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Published on DES Disclosure Log RTI Act 2009
    Premium Ecotourism Products on Whitsunday Island Feasibility study Department of Environment and Science Reference: 503504 Final report 2019-01-17 Log Disclosure 2009 DES Act on RTI Published 19-067 File A Page 1 of 225 Document control record Document prepared by: Aurecon Australasia Pty Ltd ABN 54 005 139 873 Level 14, 32 Turbot Street Brisbane QLD 4000 Locked Bag 331 Brisbane QLD 4001 Australia T +61 7 3173 8000 F +61 7 3173 8001 E [email protected] W aurecongroup.com Log A person using Aurecon documents or data accepts the risk of: a) Using the documents or data in electronic form without requesting and checking them for accuracy against the original hard copy version. b) Using the documents or data for any purpose not agreed to in writing by Aurecon. Document control Report title Feasibility study Disclosure Document code Project number 503504 File path C:\Users\anna.gannon\AppData\Roaming\OpenText\OTEdit\EC_cs\c187438359\Whitsunday Island feasibility study_final 10.12.18.docx2009 Client Department of DESEnvironment and Science Client contact Michael O’Neill ActClient reference DES 18007 Rev Date Revisionon details/status Author Reviewer Verifier Approver (if required) 1 2018-10-12 Draft feasibilityRTI study report AG PG LK 2 2018-11-23 Final draft feasibility study AG PG DK report 3 2018-11-29 Final draft feasibility study AG PG DK report v2 4 2018-12-12 Final feasibility study report AG PG DK 5 2018-12-21 Final feasibility study report v2 AG PG DK 6 Published2019-01-18 Final Feasibility Study AG DK Current revision 6 Approval Author signature Approver signature Name Name Title Title Project number 503504 File EDOCS-#7475505-v1-Whitsunday_Island_Feasibility_Study_Final 2019-01-17 Revision 6 19-067 File A Page 2 of 225 Contents 1 Background and strategic context ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Genuine and Sequestered Natural Products from the Genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae, Lamiales)
    Review Genuine and Sequestered Natural Products from the Genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae, Lamiales) Friederike Scharenberg and Christian Zidorn * Pharmazeutisches Institut, Abteilung Pharmazeutische Biologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Gutenbergstraße 76, 24118 Kiel, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-431-880-1139 Received: 10 October 2018; Accepted: 28 October 2018; Published: 30 October 2018 Abstract: The present review gives an overview about natural products from the holoparasitic genus Orobanche (Orobanchaceae). We cover both genuine natural products as well as compounds sequestered by Orobanche taxa from their host plants. However, the distinction between these two categories is not always easy. In cases where the respective authors had not indicated the opposite, all compounds detected in Orobanche taxa were regarded as genuine Orobanche natural products. From the about 200 species of Orobanche s.l. (i.e., including Phelipanche) known worldwide, only 26 species have so far been investigated phytochemically (22 Orobanche and four Phelipanche species), from 17 Orobanche and three Phelipanche species defined natural products (and not only natural product classes) have been reported. For two species of Orobanche and one of Phelipanche dedicated studies have been performed to analyze the phenomenon of natural product sequestration by parasitic plants from their host plants. In total, 70 presumably genuine natural products and 19 sequestered natural products have been described from Orobanche s.l.; these form the basis of 140 chemosystematic records (natural product reports per taxon). Bioactivities described for Orobanche s.l. extracts and natural products isolated from Orobanche species include in addition to antioxidative and anti-inflammatory effects, e.g., analgesic, antifungal and antibacterial activities, inhibition of amyloid β aggregation, memory enhancing effects as well as anti-hypertensive effects, inhibition of blood platelet aggregation, and diuretic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Tyres Flat and Saramac Downs Vegetation Assessment Report
    Ecological Consulting Tyres Flat and Saramac Downs Vegetation Assessment Report Part of Lot 43 on Plan WV437, Lot 42 on Plan WV1499, Lot 41 on Plan WV436 and Lot 1 on RP200575. Compiled by BOOBOOK for Santos BOOBOOK 15 Quintin Street PO Box 924 Roma QLD 4455 Ph. 07 4622 2646 Fax 07 4622 1325 [email protected] ABN: 94 617 952 309 www.boobook.biz Revision Date Description Author Verifier Approved C. Eddie, R. A 31/07/13 Draft issued to client for review R. Aisthorpe C. Eddie Johnson R. Aisthorpe, R. B 22/10/2013 Report incorporating client comment - R. Johnson Johnson Amended report including discussion 0 31/8/2017 R. Johnson C. Eddie C. Eddie of MNES fauna habitat Executive Summary This report provides a summary of the results of a field inspection undertaken by BOOBOOK on the 23rd of November 2012 and 19th of June 2013 at ‘Tyres Flat’ and ‘Saramac Downs’, located about 31km east- northeast of Roma, Queensland (the Site). BOOBOOK Ecological Consulting (BOOBOOK) was engaged to ground truth Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP) certified High Value Regrowth (HVR) mapping occurring on both properties. The Site is currently mapped as non-remnant except for seven HVR polygons containing Endangered regional ecosystems (REs) or Least Concern REs. The intention of the field inspection was to ground-truth the mapped HVR and to assess the extent of any unmapped regrowth and remnant REs within the Site. Sixteen survey sites were completed during the assessment. Quaternary level assessments were undertaken at 14 of these sites to assess the vegetation and RE types present at each.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland in The
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Preliminary Determination The Scientific Committee, established by the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (the Act), has made a Preliminary Determination under Section 22 of the Act to support a proposal for the inclusion of Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland in the Sydney Basin Bioregion as a CRITICALLY ENDANGERED ECOLOGICAL COMMUNITY in Part 2 of Schedule 1A of the Act, and as a consequence to omit reference to Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland of the Sydney Basin Bioregion from Part 3 of Schedule 1 of the Act. This determination contains the following information: Parts 1 & 2: Section 4 of the Act defines an ecological community as “an assemblage of species occupying a particular area”. These features of Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland in the Sydney Basin Bioregion are described in Parts 1 and 2 of this Determination, respectively. Part 3: Part 3 of this Determination describes the eligibility for listing of this ecological community in Part 2 of Schedule 1A of the Act according to criteria as prescribed by the Threatened Species Conservation Regulation 2010. Part 4: Part 4 of this Determination provides additional information intended to aid recognition of this community in the field. Part 1. Assemblage of species 1.1 Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland in the Sydney Basin Bioregion (hereafter referred to as the Hunter Valley Weeping Myall Woodland) is characterised by the assemblage of species listed below. Acacia gunnii Elymus scaber var. scaber Acacia homalophylla–Acacia melvillei Enchylaena tomentosa complex Acacia implexa Enteropogon acicularis Acacia pendula Eragrostis alveiformis Acacia salicina Eremophila debilis Allocasuarina luehmannii Eucalyptus crebra Amyema congener subsp.
    [Show full text]
  • Ash Island Plant Species List
    Ash Island Plant Species List Lowland KWRP Family Botanical Name Common name Woodland Floodplain + Nursery Rainforest Malvaceae Abutilon oxycarpum Lantern Bush 1 Fabaceae Acacia falciformis 1 Fabaceae Acacia floribunda Sunshine Wattle 1 1 1 Fabaceae Acacia implexa Hickory Wattle 1 1 1 Fabaceae Acacia longifolia Sydney Golden Wattle 1 1 Fabaceae Acacia maidenii Maidens Wattle 1 1 Myrtaceae Acmena smithii Lillypilly 1 1 Rutaceae Acronychia oblongifolia Lemon Aspen 1 1 Adiantaceae Adiantum aethiopicum Rough Maidenhair 1 Adiantaceae Adiantum formosum Maidenhair 1 Adiantaceae Adiantum hispidulum Rough Maidenhair Fern 1 Sapindaceae Alectryon subcinereus Wild Quince 1 1 Casuarinaceae Allocasuarina paludosa Swamp She-Oak 1 1 Araceae Alocasia brisbanensis Cunjevoi 1 1 Rhamnaceae Alphitonia excelsa Red Ash 1 1 Amaranthaceae Alternanthera denticulate Lesser Joyweed 1 1 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus sp. Amaranth Loranthaceae Amyema congener 1 Loranthaceae Amyema gaudichaudii 1 Loranthaceae Amyema pendulum 1 Loranthaceae Amyema sp. Mistletoe Cunoniaceae Aphanopetalum resinosum Gum Vine 1 1 Anthericaceae Arthropodium sp. Vanilla Lily 1 1 Aspleniaceae Asplenium australasicum Bird’s Nest Fern 1 Aspleniaceae Asplenium flabellifolium Necklace Fern 1 Chenopodiaceae Atriplex cinerea 1 Sterculiaceae Brachychiton populneus Kurrajong 1 1 1 Euphorbiaceae Breynia oblongifolia Coffee Bush 1 1 Myrtaceae Callistemon salignus White Bottlebrush 1 1 1 Convolvulaceae Calystegia marginata 1 Rubiaceae Canthium coprosmoides Coast Canthium 1 Capparaceae Capparis arborea Native
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Assessment - Riverside Oaks Golf Course - Conacher Travers 2001
    Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Riverside Oaks Golf Course 74 O’Briens Road, Cattai March 2021 (REF: 18ROME02) Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Riverside Oaks Golf Course 74 O’Briens Road, Cattai Accredited Michael Sheather-Reid B. Nat. Res. (Hons.) – Managing Director assessors: Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17085 Lindsay Holmes B. Sc. – Senior Botanist – Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17032 George Plunkett B. Sc. (Hons.), PhD – Botanist – Accredited Assessor no. BAAS19010 Corey Mead B. App. Sc. – TreeHouse Ecology - Fauna Ecologist - Accredited Assessor no. BAAS19050 Plans prepared: Sandy Cardow B. Sc. Approved by: Michael Sheather-Reid (Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17085) Date: 02/03/2021 File: 18ROME02BDAR This document is copyright © Travers bushfire & ecology 2021 Disclaimer: This report has been prepared to provide advice to the client on matters pertaining to the particular and specific development proposal as advised by the client and / or their authorised representatives. This report can be used by the client only for its intended purpose and for that purpose only. Should any other use of the advice be made by any person, including the client, then this firm advises that the advice should not be relied upon. The report and its attachments should be read as a whole and no individual part of the report or its attachments should be interpreted without reference to the entire report. The mapping is indicative of available space and location of features which may prove critical in assessing the viability of the proposed works. Mapping has been produced on a map base with an inherent level of inaccuracy, the location of all mapped features is to be confirmed by a registered surveyor.
    [Show full text]
  • Mistletoes and Thionins
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Pharmacy 49 Mistletoes and Thionins as Selection Models in Natural Products Drug Discovery SONNY LARSSON ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6192 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-6824-8 2007 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7705 ! "!!# $!! % & % % ' ( % ' )* + , - &* . /* "!!#* + * / 0 ' & * 1 * 2* 34 * * 5/0 2#672744736"76* + % & % , % 8 * 5 8 9 ,& & % % & & * 1 8 % % * + % * : & % ; , % & & % 7 * % % & % , ; %% * 1 %% % / , * + % & % 01 ; , & % : & & 6/ "3/ 01 ; , / * 1 & & , ; % % / * + % 9 % 9 9 , % < * + % % ' + , & (/ ) / , , % & 7 7 2 #<+* & . , & % * 5 , 9 , % % ; 9 & , & & * ! "# & & / $ %" $ $ & '()$ $ *+(',-. $ !" = / . "!!# 5//0 34732" 5/0 2#672744736"76 $ $$$ 7##!4 ( $>> *9*> ? @ $ $$$ 7##!4) ...his task had never been to undo what he had done, but to finish what he had begun. A Wizard of Earthsea Ursula K. Le Guin List of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, referred to in the text by their roman numerals:
    [Show full text]