DOCSLIB.ORG

Flora and Fauna Assessment - Riverside Oaks Golf Course - Conacher Travers 2001

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flora and Fauna Assessment - Riverside Oaks Golf Course - Conacher Travers 2001 Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Riverside Oaks Golf Course 74 O’Briens Road, Cattai March 2021 (REF: 18ROME02) Biodiversity Development Assessment Report Riverside Oaks Golf Course 74 O’Briens Road, Cattai Accredited Michael Sheather-Reid B. Nat. Res. (Hons.) – Managing Director assessors: Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17085 Lindsay Holmes B. Sc. – Senior Botanist – Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17032 George Plunkett B. Sc. (Hons.), PhD – Botanist – Accredited Assessor no. BAAS19010 Corey Mead B. App. Sc. – TreeHouse Ecology - Fauna Ecologist - Accredited Assessor no. BAAS19050 Plans prepared: Sandy Cardow B. Sc. Approved by: Michael Sheather-Reid (Accredited Assessor no. BAAS17085) Date: 02/03/2021 File: 18ROME02BDAR This document is copyright © Travers bushfire & ecology 2021 Disclaimer: This report has been prepared to provide advice to the client on matters pertaining to the particular and specific development proposal as advised by the client and / or their authorised representatives. This report can be used by the client only for its intended purpose and for that purpose only. Should any other use of the advice be made by any person, including the client, then this firm advises that the advice should not be relied upon. The report and its attachments should be read as a whole and no individual part of the report or its attachments should be interpreted without reference to the entire report. The mapping is indicative of available space and location of features which may prove critical in assessing the viability of the proposed works. Mapping has been produced on a map base with an inherent level of inaccuracy, the location of all mapped features is to be confirmed by a registered surveyor. TBE Environmental Pty Ltd 38A The Avenue t: 02 4340 5331 ABN 85 624 419 870 Mt Penang Parklands e: [email protected] PO Box 7138 Central Coast Highway Kariong NSW 2250 Kariong NSW 2250 www.traversecology.com.au Executive Summary Travers bushfire & ecology (TBE) has been engaged by Nanshan Holdings (Aust) Pty Ltd to prepare a biodiversity development assessment report (BDAR) at the Riverside Oaks Golf Course, Cattai. The site is known as the Riverside Oaks Tourist Resort and is currently an operational golf resort facility with significant tourist accommodation and social and corporate event management facilities. Purpose of BDAR The BDAR assesses the biodiversity impacts of a proposed concept masterplan to enable four (4) proposed residential precinct areas, hotel and associated access roads and services including asset protection zones (APZs). Background The surveyed landscape presently contains two (2) golf courses, tourist lodging, club house and function centre and residential development in the north-east part of the site, containing forty-two (42) lots. The study area is subject to a previously approved master plan (1989) based on previous surveys by Ecotone Ecological Consultants (1997) and Conacher Travers (2001). This plan included development spread within each of the major existing bushland portions providing hotel accommodation, holiday cabins, a resort complex, roads and a driving range. Some of this previous masterplan including Areas B, C, D and some of Area F (Figure 1.1) were acted upon to make up the current layout. The 1989 approval and APZs had an estimated impact area of 35.6 ha. The concept master plan has been developed to have less impact upon the site’s ecological resources and to maintain arboreal connectivity. The proposed concept master plan is smaller and estimated to have an impact on 29.44 ha of remnant native vegetation. The 1989 approval design in its entirety, including the remaining works will significantly impact upon natural resources and sever some arboreal connectivity across the landscape. In 2016 an Ecological Assessment report was prepared by Travers bushfire & ecology to support a Planning Proposal to provide a more consolidated landscape and protect important habitat. This assessment supported the implementation of the development control plan (DCP) for the site. A draft amendment to The Hills SCP 2012 Part B Section 1 - Rural has been prepared to support the 2016 planning proposal. The Planning Proposal was approved in 2018 by the Minister for an amendment to the Hills Local Environmental Plan (LEP) 2012 to permit up to three hundred (300) dwelling houses and tourist accommodation (refer to Figure 1.2). The biodiversity offset strategy (separate document) will take the 1989 approval into consideration for determining the appropriate offsets and rehabilitation works on retained vegetation on site. i Concept masterplan A concept masterplan (2019) has been prepared that is generally consistent with the DCP, with the hotel design at the northern tip of Precinct C. Precincts A and B have also been refined to reduce their footprint. An Ecological Consistency Report was prepared by Travers bushfire & ecology (April 2019) to identify the consistencies and inconsistencies in anticipated ecological impacts between the Riverside Oaks Tourism Complex, as referred to in Part B Section 1 - Rural of The Hills Development Control Plan 2012 (DCP), and the current proposed concept masterplan. Figure A below shows the original 1989 approved layout. Figure A - Master Plan Approval (1989) ii Figure B - Updated Master Plan, May 2019 The Ecological Consistency Report has been provided to Council and fundamentally demonstrated that the proposed concept masterplan does not significantly vary from the DCP outcomes and is consistent with the ecological outcomes and recommendations as proposed under the DCP and recommendations as agreed to by Dr Ross Goldingay for Yellow-bellied Glider. In particular there has been an improvement in the area of land protected under the conservation zone and the tree retention areas. The key outcomes of the Ecological Consistency Report include: • Closer examination of tree retention associated with the proposed hotel precinct and precinct C has identified priority areas for protection and enhancement of canopy connectivity. • Remapping of Shale Sandstone Transition Forest (SSTF) to Yellow Bloodwood - Narrow-leaved Apple heathy woodland PCT 1640 using the BAM (2020) associated with precinct B. • An overall reduced impact on (SSTF) and a not significant impact caused by the proposed changes as embodied in the Concept masterplan • An improvement in the overall width and extent of tree retention areas in precincts A, B & C resulting in an increase of 4.6 ha protected under tree retention areas which results in a significant improvement in canopy connectivity for Yellow-bellied Glider. • Detailed examination of the Hotel Precinct and proposed enhancement works to maintain and improve canopy connectivity. • More detailed assessment for arboreal connectivity options through the golf course iii Figure C – Overlay between approved Masterpolan (1989) and the concept master plan DA2019 It is noted that the consistency report was prepared prior this BDAR and changes in the concept masterplan have been made in response to agency comments. The two key changes are the provision of the eastern link road to RFS standards and the expansion of the stewardship site to cover all remaining large remnants of vegetation within the study area in accordance with the Biodiversity Offset Strategy. The concept masterplan will form the development application, and will be assessed within this report in accordance with BAM (2020). It includes the creation of four (4) Residential Development Precincts (A, B, C & D) and one (1) Tourist Precinct (H). This includes a conservation area which forms part of a Biodiversity Stewardship Site. All residual lands are to be managed in accordance with a vegetation management plan. Figure 1.2 of the document (or Figure B in the executive summary) shows the four (4) proposed development precincts (A-D) and the Hotel Precinct (H), Figure 1.3 depicts the staging of the development. In addition to the development precincts, an upgraded secondary road link has been provided to the south of precincts A & B extending to the east, entering Wisemans Ferry Road. For the purposes of determining development impacts, the link road between Precinct C, B and A out to the south-east corner of the study area has allowed 4m either side of the road for potential cut and fill impacts. The link road follows the existing access track where possible with an increased pavement width of 8m. Peripheral areas within the golf course lands (outside of the subdivision lots) include areas important for biodiversity as well as areas that will be used for asset protection and fire trails. The management of these peripheral areas is to be assured through the preparation of a vegetation management plan, biodiversity stewardship agreement and a fuel management plan, with long term management being undertaken by the landowner. Where the landowner iv will be the relevant neighbourhood association, funding for long term management will be incorporated into the Community Title Scheme. The fuel management plan will be integrated with the VMP and will detail the ongoing vegetation management requirements of the APZ and fire trails as well as incorporating a strategic burn program. Almost 55 ha of the proposed lands will be set up in the agreed conservation area, managed as a biodiversity stewardship site to be registered on title. Currently, the proposed stewardship site contains 52.84 ha of native vegetation. The ecological assessment in 2016 has involved extensive liaison with Dr Ross Goldingay
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Muelleria : an Australian Journal of Botany
    Muelleria Volume 5 Number 1 March, 1982 NATIONAL HERBARIUM OF VICTORIA DEPARTMENT OF CROWN LANDS AND SURVEY Muelleria Volume 5, Number 1 March, 1982 CONTENTS Page A revision of the genus Templelonia R.Br. (Papilionaceae) — J. H. Ross 1 The nomenclature of some Australian lichens described as Lecanora and Placodium by Miiller-Argoviensis — R. W. Rogers 31 New Australian species of Nymphoides Seguier (Menyanthaceae) — Helen 1. Aston 35 Vegetation of East Gippsland — S. J. Forbes, N. G. Walsh and P. K. Gullan 53 A new Australian lichen: Cladonia sulcata — A. W. Archer 115 Editor: Helen 1. Aston Published by the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL). Royal Botanic Gardens, South Yarra, Victoria 3141, Australia. D. M. Churchill, Director and Government Botanist. 43346/81 The date of publication of Volume 4, number 4, was 20 May 1981. A REVISION OF THE GENUS TEMPLETONIA R.Br. (PAPILIONACEAE) by J. H. Ross* ABSTRACT The endemic Australian genus Templetonia is revised. Eleven species are recognized and the uncertainty concerning the application of the name T. sulcata (Meissn.) Benth. is discussed. This discussion includes the selection ol a lectotype for Bossiaea rossii F. Muell., a possible synonym. Descriptions, a key to the identification of species, illustrations, and distribution maps are provided, together with notes on ecology and relationships. Two previous papers describing T. incana (.Muelleria 4: 247-249 (1980)) and T. negketa (loc. cit. 390-393 (1981)) should be used in conjunction with the present revision. INTRODUCTION Templetonia, a small genus of 1 1 species described by R. Brown in Ait. f Hort. , Kew. ed. 2, 4: 269 (1812), was named in honour of the Irish botanist John Templeton (1776-1825) ot Orange Grove, Belfast.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Indigenous/Low Water Use Species
    Shrubs Tristaniopsis laurina Eucalyptus heamastoma Eucalyptus saligna Eucalyptus resinifera Eucalyptus racemosa Eucalyptus piperita Eucalyptus pilularis Eucalyptus paniculata Eucalyptus luehmanniana Elaeocarpus reticulatus Corymbia gummifera Callicoma serratifolia Backhousia myrtifolia Angophora floribunda Angophora costata Allocasuarina torulosa Trees Botanical Name KU-RING-GAI CITYCOUNCIL List ofindigenous/lowwaterusespecies Water Gum Scribbly Gum Sydney BlueGum Red Mahogany Snappy Gum Sydney Peppermint Blackbutt Grey Ironbark Yellow TopAsh Blueberry Ash Red Bloodwood Black Wattle Grey Myrtle Rough BarkedApple Smooth BarkedApple Forest Oak Common Name * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Sandstone * * * * * Clay Soil Type Ku-ring-gai * Page 1 * * Riparian * Coastal & estuarine * Tertiary Alluvium Landscape Use * * * Shade tolerant * * * * Screening * * * * * * * * * * * * Bird attracting * * * * * * Showy flowers Plant Characteristics * * * * * Interesting fruit/seed pods * * * * Rare/uncommon 3-10 15-30 10-25 15-25 15-30 15-30 6-25 8-20 3-15 8-20 3-5 4-8 3-5 3-4 5-8 15 Height - metres 3-5 5-12 4-10 5-10 8-12 8-10 8-15 3-10 3-10 4-10 3-4 2-4 2-3 2-3 Width - metres Ku-ring-gai Allocasuarina distyla * * * * 2-3 2-3 Banksia ericifolia Heath Leaved Banksia * * * * 2-3 2.5 Banksia serrata Old Man Banksia * * * * 4-16 2-5 Callistemon citrinus Crimson Bottlebrush * * * * * 2-3 1-2 Ceratopetalum gummiferum NSW Christmas Bush * * * 2-4 1-3 Clerodendrum tomentosum Hairy Clerodendrum * * * * * * * 2 1.5 Kunzea ambigua Tick Bush * 2-4 2 Persoonia linearis Narrow Leaved Geebung * * * * * * * 3-5 1 Ground Covers / Scramblers Clematis aristata Old Man's Beard * * * * Dichondra repens Kidney Weed * * * * 0.1 x Pandorea Pandorana Wonga Wonga Vine * * * * * Pratia purpurascens * * * * * 0.1 x Ferns Adiantum aethiopicum Madenhair Fern * * * * 0.3 x Grasses / Tufted Plants Dianella caerulea s.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Below) with Family Name Provided
    1 Australian Plants Society Plant Table Profiles – Sutherland Group (updated August 2021) Below is a progressive list of all cultivated plants from members’ gardens and Joseph Banks Native Plants Reserve that have made an appearance on the Plant Table at Sutherland Group meetings. Links to websites are provided for the plants so that further research can be done. Plants are grouped in the categories of: Trees and large shrubs (woody plants generally taller than 4 m) Medium to small shrubs (woody plants from 0.1 to 4 m) Ground covers or ground-dwelling (Grasses, orchids, herbaceous and soft-wooded plants, ferns etc), as well as epiphytes (eg: Platycerium) Vines and scramblers Plants are in alphabetical order by botanic names within plants categories (see table of contents below) with family name provided. Common names are included where there is a known common name for the plant: Table of Contents Trees and Large shrubs........................................................................................................................... 2 Medium to small shrubs ...................................................................................................................... 23 Groundcovers and other ground‐dwelling plants as well as epiphytes. ............................................ 64 Vines and Scramblers ........................................................................................................................... 86 Sutherland Group http://sutherland.austplants.com.au 2 Trees and Large shrubs Acacia decurrens
    [Show full text]
  • Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd 'S WT PRIMAR NDTR1
    EIS 1790 Widemere Estate: Bora! Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd 's WT PRIMAR NDTR1 fAO66847 L c>C /ccTh Widemere Lstate Amendment to State Environmental Planning Policy No. 59 Boral Resources (NSW) Pty Ltd r -,---,k- - Ofli) I LI!IIIPJIOL LJUI ).))) EU i UaOr Delivering sustainable SOil!tIOfIS iii 0 more corupelilive world 7,w) Boral Resources (NS\N) Pty Ltd December 200 8010584 Approved by: Judy McKittrick - Position: Project Director www.entn.com Signed: Date: (1 21 December 2001 Euviron,nenlal Resources Management Australia Ply Ltd Quality System Jiii.irce.; ipr JRJ H :-.s hi i lrl iJ1s1t1 lii L\vcii }:lIillLllYiLlIL1 lsiieiuenI AusmiiIi '(v lid A( N 00277H 24e (ERNl disH (liCliLl1(. 1 he I eporl rclie up's dule, ILIrvevs, 1r'durdrncnlsu1d rel1s lakeis l or under t he i 'arliculci' tines and coisd i lions specified herein. Any find jigs, ci sitel nsons or reconi n etsdn Lions only apply to the aforenien tinned circn instances nd no rea Icr reliance should he a ssu nd or H saws by I he ClienI. Furthermore, the report l's,ss been prepared solely for use by (he Clien I and 11KM stccepls no 'esponsbililv lorik rweb'r oiler parties. TABLE OF CONTENTS Puge No. 1. INTRODUCTION I 2. SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA 3 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION 3 2.2 SITE HISTORY 3 2.3 SURROUNDING LAND USES 7 3. PLANNING CONTROLS 9 3.1 INTRODUCTION 9 3.2 STATE ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING POLICIES 9 3.2.1 Central Western Sydney Economic and Employment Area 9 3.2.2 Remediation of Land 10 3.2.3 Integrating Land Use and Transport 11 3.3 REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS 11 3.3.1 Georges River Catchment 11 3.3.2 Extractive Industry 12 3.3.3 Western Sydney Regional Park 13 3.4 LOCAL ENVIRONMENTAL PLANS 13 3.4.1 Fairfield Local Environmental Plan 1994 13 3.4.2 Hoiroyd Local Environmental Plan 13 3.5 OTHER PLANNING POLICIES 14 3.5.1 Shaping Western Sydney - The Planning Strategy for Western Sydney 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to Native Plants in North Sydney Nurseries Who Supply Local Native Plants for the North Sydney Region
    Live Local Plant Local a guide to native plants in North Sydney Nurseries who supply local native plants for the North Sydney region Ku-ring-gai Community Nursery Run through Ku-ring-gai Council. Ask for local plants for North Sydney area. 430 Mona Vale Road, St. Ives. Phone: (02) 9424 0376 / 0409 035 570 Tharwa Native Nursery Retail/Wholesale. Ask for local species for North Sydney area. 21 Myoora Road, Terry Hills. Phone: (02) 9450 1967 www.tubestocktharwanursery.com.au Wirreanda Nursery Indigenous species that Retail/Wholesale. Ask for local native species for North Sydney. make ideal garden plants 7 Wirreanda Road North, Ingleside. Phone: (02) 9450 1400 We can preserve and recreate some of North Sydney’s www.wirreandanursery.com.au unique native vegetation in our gardens by planting locally indigenous species. Many native species are Harvest Seeds & Native Plants becoming rare and our bushland is under threat from Retail/Wholesale. fragmentation, degradation, and the introduction of exotic Provenance is displayed. species. Planting locally not only benefits the environment 281 Mona Vale Road, Terry Hills. and native fauna, but is also beneficial to you, as these Phone: (02) 9450 2699 species require little watering, fertilising and maintenance. www.harvestseeds-nativeplants.com.au The selection of 30 indigenous species over the next few Indigo Native Nursery pages make ideal garden plants because they are hardy, Lot 57 Wattle Road, Ingleside. attractive, suitable for a variety of conditions and are easy Phone: (02) 9970 8709 to maintain.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains Including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas
    Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains including the Capertee, Coxs, Jenolan & Gurnang Areas Volume 1: Technical Report Hawkesbury-Nepean CMA CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains (including the Capertee, Cox’s, Jenolan and Gurnang Areas) Volume 1: Technical Report (Final V1.1) Project funded by the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority Information and Assessment Section Metropolitan Branch Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation July 2006 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been completed by the Special thanks to: Information and Assessment Section, Metropolitan Branch. The numerous land owners including State Forests of NSW who allowed access to their Section Head, Information and Assessment properties. Julie Ravallion The Department of Natural Resources, Forests NSW and Hawkesbury – Nepean CMA for Coordinator, Bioregional Data Group comments on early drafts. Daniel Connolly This report should be referenced as follows: Vegetation Project Officer DEC (2006) The Vegetation of the Western Blue Mountains. Unpublished report funded by Greg Steenbeeke the Hawkesbury – Nepean Catchment Management Authority. Department of GIS, Data Management and Database Environment and Conservation, Hurstville. Coordination Peter Ewin Photos Kylie Madden Vegetation community profile photographs by Greg Steenbeeke Greg Steenbeeke unless otherwise noted. Feature cover photo by Greg Steenbeeke. All Logistics
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 3 Section 5A Assessments “Seven Part Tests”
    APPENDIX 3 SECTION 5A ASSESSMENTS “SEVEN PART TESTS” Appendix 3: Seven Part Tests Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner bioregions is listed as an Endangered Ecological Community under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act (1995). It is not listed under the schedules of the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (1999). Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains of the NSW North Coast, Sydney Basin and South East Corner bioregions includes and replaces Sydney Coastal Estuary Swamp Forest in the Sydney Basin bioregion Endangered Ecological Community. This community is associated with humic clay loams and sandy loams, on waterlogged or periodically inundated alluvial flats and drainage lines associated with coastal floodplains (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). It occurs typically as open forests to woodlands, although partial clearing may have reduced the canopy to scattered trees or scrub. The understorey may contain areas of fernland and tall reedland or sedgeland which in turn may also form mosaics with other floodplain communities and often fringe wetlands with semi-permanent standing water (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains generally occurs below 20 metres ASL, often on small floodplains or where the larger floodplains adjoin lithic substrates or coastal sand plains (NSW Scientific Committee 2011). The species composition of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest is primarily determined by the frequency and duration of waterlogging and the texture, salinity nutrient and moisture content of the soil. The species composition of the trees varies considerably, but the most widespread and abundant dominant trees include Eucalyptus robusta Swamp Mahogany, Melaleuca quinquenervia and, south from Sydney, Eucalyptus botryoides Bangalay and Eucalyptus longifolia Woollybutt (OEH 2015a).
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER?
    Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology ISSN: 1409-3871 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica BACKHOUSE, GARY N. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA Lankesteriana International Journal on Orchidology, vol. 7, núm. 1-2, marzo, 2007, pp. 28- 43 Universidad de Costa Rica Cartago, Costa Rica Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44339813005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative LANKESTERIANA 7(1-2): 28-43. 2007. ARE OUR ORCHIDS SAFE DOWN UNDER? A NATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF THREATENED ORCHIDS IN AUSTRALIA GARY N. BACKHOUSE Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Division, Department of Sustainability and Environment 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia [email protected] KEY WORDS:threatened orchids Australia conservation status Introduction Many orchid species are included in this list. This paper examines the listing process for threatened Australia has about 1700 species of orchids, com- orchids in Australia, compares regional and national prising about 1300 named species in about 190 gen- lists of threatened orchids, and provides recommen- era, plus at least 400 undescribed species (Jones dations for improving the process of listing regionally 2006, pers. comm.). About 1400 species (82%) are and nationally threatened orchids. geophytes, almost all deciduous, seasonal species, while 300 species (18%) are evergreen epiphytes Methods and/or lithophytes. At least 95% of this orchid flora is endemic to Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Survey Guidelines for Australia's Threatened Orchids
    SURVEY GUIDELINES FOR AUSTRALIA’S THREATENED ORCHIDS GUIDELINES FOR DETECTING ORCHIDS LISTED AS ‘THREATENED’ UNDER THE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION ACT 1999 0 Authorship and acknowledgements A number of experts have shared their knowledge and experience for the purpose of preparing these guidelines, including Allanna Chant (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Allison Woolley (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment), Andrew Brown (Western Australian Department of Environment and Conservation), Annabel Wheeler (Australian Biological Resources Study, Australian Department of the Environment), Anne Harris (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), David T. Liddle (Northern Territory Department of Land Resource Management, and Top End Native Plant Society), Doug Bickerton (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), John Briggs (New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage), Luke Johnston (Australian Capital Territory Environment and Sustainable Development Directorate), Sophie Petit (School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia), Melanie Smith (Western Australian Department of Parks and Wildlife), Oisín Sweeney (South Australian Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources), Richard Schahinger (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment). Disclaimer The views and opinions contained in this document are not necessarily those of the Australian Government. The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and while reasonable care has been taken in its compilation, the Australian Government does not accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document.
    [Show full text]
  • 1995 New Zealand Botanical Society
    NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 42 DECEMBER 1995 New Zealand Botanical Society President: Jessica Beever Secretary/Treasurer: Anthony Wright Committee: Catherine Beard, Colin Webb, Carol West, Beverley Clarkson, Bruce Clarkson Address: C/- Auckland Institute & Museum Private Bag 92018 AUCKLAND Subscriptions The 1996 ordinary and institutional subs are $14 (reduced to $10 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). The 1996 student sub, available to full-time students, is $7 (reduced to $5 if paid by the due date on the subscription invoice). Back issues of the Newsletter are available at $2.50 each - from Number 1 (August 1985) to Number 41 (September 1995). Since 1986 the Newsletter has appeared quarterly in March, June, September and December. New subscriptions are always welcome and these, together with back issue orders, should be sent to the Secretary/Treasurer (address above). Subscriptions are due by 28 February of each year for that calendar year. Existing subscribers are sent an invoice with the December Newsletter for the next year's subscription which offers a reduction if this is paid by the due date. If you are in arrears with your subscription a reminder notice comes attached to each issue of the Newsletter. Deadline for next issue The deadline for the March 1996 issue (Number 43) is 28 February 1996. Please forward contributions to: Bruce & Beverley Clarkson, Editors NZ Botanical Society Newsletter 7 Lynwood Place HAMILTON Contributions may be provided on floppy disc (preferably in Word Perfect 5.1) or by e-mail ([email protected]). NEW ZEALAND BOTANICAL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER NUMBER 42 DECEMBER 1995 CONTENTS News New Zealand Botanical Society News From the Secretary 2 Regional Botanical Society News Nelson Botanical Society .
    [Show full text]