DOCSLIB.ORG

RAND History Project Interview: General Bernard Schreiver 5/18/1990

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RAND History Project Interview: General Bernard Schreiver 5/18/1990 NATIONAL A.IR AND SPACE !1CSEUM RAND CORPORATION JOINT ORAL HISTORY PROJECT ON THE HISTORY OF THE RAND CORPORATION EDITORIAL USE FORM PREFACE This manuscript is based upon a tape-recorded interview conducted by ~1artin collins on _....;:....;1a.;;:.y_l~8.:..,_1_9_9_0_~~____ The ~ape and the manuscript are the property of the undersigned: however, the originals and copies are indefinitely deposited, respec~ivelYI at the National Air and Space Museum of the Smithsonian Ins~itu~ion and at the RAND corpora~ion. I have read the transcript 'and have made only minor corrections and emendations. The reader is therefore asked to bear in mind that this manuscript is a record of a spoken conversation ra~her than a literary product. Though the Smithsonian Institution and the RAND corporation may use these materials for their own purposes as they deem appropriate, I wish to place the condition as selected below upon the use of this interview material by others and I understand that the smithsonian Ins~itution and the RAND Corporation will make reasonable efforts to enforce the condition to the extent possible. CONDI!'::!:ONS (Check one) PUBLIC. THE MATERIAL MAY BE MADE AVAILABLE TO AND MAY BE USED BY ~.NY PERSON FOR .Z>..NY !..AWFUL PURPOSE. I OPEN. This manuscript may be read and the tape heard by persons approved by the smithsonian Ins~itution or by ~he RAND Corporation. The user must agree not to quote from, cite or reproduce by any means this material except with the written permission of the smithsonian or RAND. MY PERMISSION REQU!RED TO QUOTE, CITE OR REPRODUCE. This manuscript and the ~ape are open to examination as above. The user ~ust agree not to quo~e from, cite or reproduce by any means this material except with the written permission of the Smithsonian or RAND in which permission I must join. Upon my death this interview becomes open. EDITORIAL ~SE FORM (CONT.~ MY PERMISSION REQUIRED FOR ACCESS. I mus~ give writen permission before t~e manuscrip~ or tape can be utilized o~her t~an by smithsonian or RAND s~aff :or official Smit~sonian or RAND purposes. Also my permission is required to quote, oite or reproduce by any means. Upon dea~h the 'nterview becomes open. nen) Bernard Schriever ed) ql (Da schriever, Bernard. Dates: May 18 and September 5, 1990. Interviewer: Martin Collins. Auspices: RAND. Length: 3 hrs.; 38 pp. Use restriction: Open. Schriever initially describes his pre-war military service and studies in engineering, General Arnold's interest in maintaining a close relationship between the military and scientific community, his assignment to the Scientific Liaison Office from late 1945 to 1949, the establishment of various post-war scientific advisory boards, and the relationship of these boards and RAND to the Scientific Liaison Office. He then discusses the creation of the Office of the Assistant for Development Planning in 1950 under DCS/Development, its mission to evaluate new weapons systems technologies for the period five to ten years in the future, the use of Development Planning Objectives (DPOs) in fulfilling this mission, some of the DPOs formulated while he headed the Office of the Assistant for Development Planning from 1950 to 1954, the controversies they produced, and the input of RAND and others into DPOs. May 18, 1990 TAPE 1, SIDE 1 1-3 Schriever's assignment to Pentagon after Second World War; reminiscence of General Hap Arnold and his views on the impact of technological development on the military; Schriever's background in engineering; Arnold's establishment of Air Force Scientific Liaison Office; Arnold's appointment of Theodore von Karman as his scientific advisor before Second World War 3-5 Arnold's establishment of Project RANDi definition of RAND mission and relationship with the Air Force 5-7 Relationship between RAND and Scientific Liaison Office; reminiscences of Gene Root, Larry Henderson 5-6 Establishment of assistant for development and planning 5-7 RAND studies on strategic bombing, nuclear weapons delivery from aircraft 8-9 Establishment of Scientific Advisory Board, Joint Research and Development Board, and their relationship with Scientific Liaison Office; development of Arnold Engineering Development Center; development of Edwards Air Force Flight Test Center TAPE 1, SIDE 2 9-11 Continued discussion of Scientific Liaison Office contacts with scientific community, Scientific Advisory Board, RAND, and Joint Research and Development Board; reminiscence of von Karman; vision of Hap Arnold 11-12 Difference between RAND and Scientific Advisory Board relationships with Air Force; creation or Division Advisory Groups (DAG) 12-14 Arnold's vision of what the Air Force needs were in scientific and technological capability in postwar SCHRIEVER-1 Interviewee: General Bernard Schriever Interviewer: Mr. Martin Collins Place: At General Schriever's home, Washington, D.C. Date: May 18, 1990 TAPE 1, SIDE 1 Hr. collins: Let me state for the record the objective of the interview. I'm interested in a better understanding of the relationship between RAND and the Air Force since RAND's inception in 1946, and more generally, how external expertise and advice has figured into Air Force decision making in some of the policy areas that RAND was involved with. It seems like a good beginning point is to go back to one of your first responsibilities immediately after World War II, as a chief of the Scientific Liaison Branch, and the deputy chief of staff, materiel area. I guess my initial question would be, "What were the responsibilities and objectives of that liaison branch, and how did it relate to the RAND enterprise, or did you come in contact with RAND at that point? General Schriever: Well, I think I might as well make a general statement as to what went on at that time, rather than to answer questions at this moment. You can then ask me questions. Because maybe I'll answer quite a few of the questions in just a discussion of what happened at that time. I returned from the Pacific war, after being over there about three and a half years in the southwest Pacific, in october of 1945. And had about two months' leave and more or less an opportunity--I was a colonel at the time--to determine my own assignment. I had been at wright Field prior to the war, and also at Stanford University, taking a graduate course there when the war started in December of '41. I also knew General ["Hap"] Arnold well, because he'd been my first commander at March Field when I finished flying school as a cadet in 1933. I was assigned to March Field, and he was the commander there, a lieutenant colonel at the time. Then in '34 he was also in charge of the western region, when the Air Corps was flying the airmail for several months, and he was stationed at Salt Lake City and I was stationed at Salt Lake City. SCBRIEVER-2 Getting back to my return, I was assigned to the Pentagon. That happened to be the place I wanted to go, and I was fortunate enough to get that assignment. General Arnold called me into his office and in essence expressed his view that the technology breakthroughs that had occurred in World War II, namely the nuclear weapon, rockets, radar, jet engines, would essentially revolutionize at least the equipments that the Air Force would need, that would require change of doctrine, strategy, and so forth. Hap Arnold was probably, at least in my opinion, the Air Force officer who had the greatest vision of any that I have known, including up to this time. And he made a number of speeches and wrote several memorandums or papers during that period right after the war, and took actions which I will try to enumerate, that certainly proves my point with respect to how visionary he was. He said to me, in terms of these technological and scientific breakthroughs, that the next war would be very different from the last one because of these technology breakthroughs, and that we needed to look far in advance, and not just a few years but like fifty years, which he talked about to (Theodore] von Karman, which I'll come to in a moment. He said, "The scientists who have made all these things possible in the laboratories that were created during World War II are all returning to their universities, for the most part, and other assignments that they had prior to the war." But they mostly had come from academia. He said it was absolutely essential for the Air Force, which he considered to be the leading service as far as technology was concerned, to maintain a very close interaction with the scientific community. He felt that it was essential that the Air Force work in a very harmonious, cooperative way with the scientific community, with the aircraft industry--we didn't call it aerospace at that time-­ and the Air Force. And he did several things during that time, but at that point he said, "Look, we need to set up an air staff office which has as its major function achieving the objective, as a staff officer." In support of the policy that he was enunciating, of having this very close relationship with the scientific community. And he said he wanted me to take over that office. He knew that I had, prior to the war, been at Wright Field, first as a test pilot and then as a student at what was called at that time the Air Corps Engineering School. It was a forerunner of what is now the Air Force Institute of Technology.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Air & Space Power Journal, September-October 2012, Volume
    September–October 2012 Volume 26, No. 5 AFRP 10-1 Senior Leader Perspective Driving towards Success in the Air Force Cyber Mission ❙ 4 Leveraging Our Heritage to Shape Our Future Lt Gen David S. Fadok, USAF Dr. Richard A. Raines Features The Air Force’s Individual Mobilization Augmentee Program ❙ 12 Is the Current Organizational Structure Viable? Col Robin G. Sneed, USAFR Lt Col Robert A. Kilmer, PhD, USA, Retired An Evolution in Intelligence Doctrine ❙ 33 The Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Mission Type Order Capt Jaylan Michael Haley, USAF Joint Targeting and Air Support in Counterinsurgency ❙ 49 How to Move to Mission Command LTC Paul Darling, Alaska Army National Guard Building Partnership Capacity ❙ 65 Operation Harmattan and Beyond Col James H. Drape, USAF Departments 94 ❙ Ira C. Eaker Award Winners 95 ❙ Views An Airman’s Perspective on Mission Command . 95 Col Dale S. Shoupe, USAF, Retired Seeing It Coming: Revitalizing Future Studies in the US Air Force . 109 Col John F. Price Jr., USAF A Misapplied and Overextended Example: Gen J . N . Mattis’s Criticism of Effects-Based Operations . 118 Maj Dag Henriksen, PhD, Royal Norwegian Air Force Academy, US Air Force Research Institute 132 ❙ Historical Highlights Geopolitics versus Geologistics Lt. Col. Harry A. Sachaklian 146 ❙ Ricochets & Replies 154 ❙ Book Reviews Embry-Riddle at War: Aviation Training during World War II . 154 Stephen G. Craft Reviewer: R. Ray Ortensie A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon . 157 Neil Sheehan Reviewer: Maj Thomas F. Menza, USAF, Retired Khobar Towers: Tragedy and Response . 160 Perry D. Jamieson Reviewer: CAPT Thomas B.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Years of Flight Test in the Miami Valley
    in the MiamiValley History Offke Aeronautical Systems Center Air Force Materiel Command ii FOREWORD Less than one hundred years ago, Lord Kelvin, the most prominent scientist of his generation, remarked that he had not “the smallest molecule of faith’ in any form of flight other than ballooning. Within a decade of his damningly pessimistic statement, the Wright brothers were routinely puttering through the skies above Huffman Prairie, pirouetting about in their frail pusher biplanes. They were there because, unlike Kelvin, they saw opportunity, not difficulty, challenge, not impossibility. And they had met that challenge, seized that opportunity, by taking the work of their minds, transforming it by their hands, making a series of gliders and, then, finally, an actual airplane that they flew. Flight testing was the key to their success. The history of flight testing encompassesthe essential history of aviation itself. For as long as humanity has aspired to fly, men and women of courage have moved resolutely from intriguing concept to practical reality by testing the result of their work in actual flight. In the eighteenth and nineteenth century, notable pioneers such asthe French Montgolfier brothers, the German Otto Lilienthal, and the American Octave Chanute blended careful study and theoretical speculation with the actual design, construction, and testing of flying vehicles. Flight testing reallycame ofage with the Wright bro!hers whocarefullycombined a thorough understanding of the problem and potentiality of flight with-for their time-sophisticated ground and flight-test methodolo- gies and equipment. After their success above the dunes at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina on December 17,1903, the brothers determined to refine their work and generate practical aircraft capable of routine operation.
    [Show full text]
  • AFA Aerospace Education Fellows
    Aerospace Education Fellows The Air Force Association proudly names each of individuals and organizations as Aerospace Education Fellows. AFA thanks both the Fellows and their sponsors for their continued support of AFA’s education programs. Doolittle Fellows Outstanding Current Operations (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter Outstanding Support (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) 432nd Special Operations Squadron (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter Groundbreaking Technology (Armed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) Predator – General Atomics (2017), presented by Central Florida Chapter David A. Dietsch (2016), presented by AFA Board of Directors General Robin Rand (2016), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Lt Gen David A. Deptula (2016), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Technology on the Horizon (Global Precision Attack) Small Diameter Bomb II (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Technology Today (Global Precision Attack) JDAM TAIL KIT (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Deployed Personnel (Global Precision Attack) USAF Deployed Airmen (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter Current Operations (Global Precision Attack) 336th Fighter Squadron (2016), presented by Central Florida Chapter HQ ACC/A3TW (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Angry Kitten EA Pod Team (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Capt Brad Dvorak (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Alpha-Omega Change Engineering (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter 705th Combat Training Squadron (2015), presented by Central Florida Chapter Maj Gen Jack Weinstein (2015), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Col Samuel Clinton Hinote (2015), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Jerry White (2015), presented by AFA National Directors Scott Van Cleef (2014), presented by AFA National Directors General Mark A. Welsh III (2014), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Major General Garrett Harencak (2014), presented by Iron Gate Chapter Colonel Robert S.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Air Force and Its Antecedents Published and Printed Unit Histories
    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AND ITS ANTECEDENTS PUBLISHED AND PRINTED UNIT HISTORIES A BIBLIOGRAPHY EXPANDED & REVISED EDITION compiled by James T. Controvich January 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTERS User's Guide................................................................................................................................1 I. Named Commands .......................................................................................................................4 II. Numbered Air Forces ................................................................................................................ 20 III. Numbered Commands .............................................................................................................. 41 IV. Air Divisions ............................................................................................................................. 45 V. Wings ........................................................................................................................................ 49 VI. Groups ..................................................................................................................................... 69 VII. Squadrons..............................................................................................................................122 VIII. Aviation Engineers................................................................................................................ 179 IX. Womens Army Corps............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Organizing for the Space Age
    USAF 's biggest challenge, opportunity, responsibility . Organizing for the Space Age CLAUDE WITZE Senior Editor, AIR FORCE/SPACE DIGEST N TWO gigantic steps the Defense Depart- huge headquarters at Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, no I ment has revolutionized its management longer will have responsibility for purchase of sys- concepts to catch up with space-age tech- tems; the new Systems Command will take charge nology and further unify the national from concept to delivery. AMC's name is being security effort. changed to the Air Force Logistics Command. It will The US Air Force has, in effect, been named the remain under the leadership of Gen. Samuel E. Ander- Department's single manager for the development of son. Eugene M. Zuckert, the Air Force Secretary, esti- military space systems. In turn, USAF has reorganized mates that about thirty percent of the dollars formerly to centralize direction of all its development and pro- spent by AMC will go over to the new Systems Com- curement programs and improve the management of mand. The latter office, which will remain at the old both its own projects and those it will develop for the ARDC Headquarters at Andrews AFB, Md., will have Army and Navy. a budget of about $5.8 billion for hardware in fiscal Robert S. McNamara, Secretary of Defense, made it year 1962. clear in announcing the first decision that the assign- There has been no estimate offered on how this ment of space development projects to USAF does not figure will change as the Air Force takes on the re- "predetermine the assignment of operational responsi- search and development of space projects under the bilities for space systems which will be made on a unified program set up by the Defense Department.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Outlines for Certain USAF Engineering Division Organizations
    Historical Outlines for Certain USAF Engineering Division Organizations (060507) Administration & Library Section, Administration Office, Equipment Laboratory (15 July 1952) Administration & Library Section was originally designated Administrative Unit of Equipment Administration in October 1946. In 1948, the library and technical reference functions were transferred from Plans Unit, Equipment Plans and consolidated with the functions of Administrative Unit. Included in the above transfer was the responsibility for indexing, distributing, and the custodianship of official file copies of all memorandum reports a written by personnel of the Equipment Laboratory. In October 1948, the name of this section was change to Administrative & Library Unit. In November 1951, it was redesignated Administration & Library Unit. In May 1952, units were redesignated as sections. Effective 2 September 1952, Weapons Components Division and Aeronautics Division were consolidated and redesignated The Directorate of Laboratories. (Ref WADC Notice No. 162, dtd 2 Sep 52.) Equipment Laboratory is now responsible to above Directorate, and organizational code WCLE was assigned to this activity to reflect above change. The function of Administration and Library Section remain the same as previously reported in Historical Outline dated 15 July 1952. Organizational code WCLEA-1 was assigned to this Section, effective 2 Sep 52. To date, this section has operated under the following organizational codes: TSEPE-3A MCREXE-X1 MCREXE-A1 DCEEA-1 WCEEA-1 WCLEA-1 (present code) AFEER Office at NACA, AAL, Moffett field, Calif. Establishment of Supply Function: To obtain in an orderly and expeditious manner Air Force Supplies to support AF aircraft assigned to NACA for flight test investigations, a supply function was established on 29 March 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of Missiles in the Us Air Force, 1957-1967
    FLAMEOUT: THE RISE AND FALL OF MISSILES IN THE U.S. AIR FORCE, 1957-1967 A Dissertation by DAVID WILLIAM BATH Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Joseph G. Dawson, III Committee Members, Terry H. Anderson Olga Dror Angela Pulley Hudson James Burk Head of Department, David Vaught December 2015 Major Subject: History Copyright 2015 David William Bath ABSTRACT This dissertation documents how the U.S. national perspective toward ballistic nuclear missiles changed dramatically between 1957 and 1967 and how the actions and attitudes of this time brought about long term difficulties for the nation, the Air Force, and the missile community. In 1957, national leaders believed that ballistic missiles would replace the manned bomber and be used to win an anticipated third world war between communist and capitalist nations. Only ten years later, the United States was deep into a limited war in Vietnam and had all but proscribed the use of nuclear missiles. This dissertation uses oral histories, memoirs, service school theses, and formerly classified government documents and histories to determine how and why the nation changed its outlook on nuclear ballistic missiles so quickly. The dissertation contends that because scientists and engineers created the revolutionary weapon at the beginning of the Cold War, when the U.S. and U.S.S.R. were struggling for influence and power, many national leaders urged the military to design and build nuclear ballistic missiles before the Soviet Union could do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Schriever and Early US Military Spaceflight Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Institute of Political and International Studies
    Bernard Schriever and Early US Military Spaceflight Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Institute of Political and International Studies Wing Commander Gerry Doyle RAF October 2016 i DISCLAIMER Research for this thesis was conducted under the auspices of a Royal Air Force Chief of Air Staff’s ‘Portal’ Fellowship while the author was a serving Royal Air Force officer. The view expressed within are, however, the author’s own, and should not be taken as representing the opinion or position of the Royal Air Force, the UK Ministry of Defence or HM Government. DECLARATION I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. 24 October 2016 G DOYLE © Gerry Doyle, 2016. ii CONTENTS Title Page………………………………………………………………………... i Disclaimer and Declaration…….……………………………………………… ii Contents…………………………………………………................................. iii Abstract………………………………………………………………………….. iv Bibliographic Notes…………………………………………………………….. v Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………….. vii List of Figures and Tables.…………………………………………………….. ix Chapter 1 – Technically Advanced Systems..………………………………. 1 Chapter 2 – Bernard Adolf Schriever …………………............................... 19 Chapter 3 – Literature, Sources and their Provenance............................... 47 Chapter 4 – The Virtuous Path: ICBMs and Reconnaissance Satellites…. 86 Chapter 5 – Manned Spaceflight: a Pet Project…………………………….. 120 Chapter 6 – Daydreaming: the USAF and Space Weaponization………… 151 Chapter 7 – Conclusions……………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS TX-3521 2507 Kennedy Circle HABS TX-3521 San Antonio Bexar County Texas
    BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS TX-3521 2507 Kennedy Circle HABS TX-3521 San Antonio Bexar County Texas PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY SOUTHWEST SYSTEM SUPPORT OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior PO Box 728 Santa Fe, New Mexico HISTORIC AMERICAN BUILDINGS SURVEY BROOKS AIR FORCE BASE HABS No. TX- 3521 Location: 2507 Kennedy Circle San Antonio Bexar County Texas ~~~QQtJ;lJ;~'l;:,t~~~,\,~,ii;) Uni'VefS'al";,q;:faflsvefS@",M(}f,~~"@(1ordjll'ateS: 1-4.,;),;)2948.3246714· ~::;. E:{1~>t~"'·· L ~,o ~~c;L ~;~>')::'i;i''\''i Present Owner: Brooks Development Authority (BDA) Present Occupant: U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) Present Use: Aerospace research and education Significance: The U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine (USAFSAM) at Brooks Air Force Base (AFB) is significant for its contributions to aviation and aerospace medicine. By pursuing research relating to the medical aspects of flight, USAFSAM has provided pilots and astronauts with the necessary equipment and support to ensure their overall safety and health. In 1926, Brooks Field began its first association with the School of Aviation Medicine (SAM) when it moved from New York in order to support the Primary Flying School at Brooks Field. While stationed there from 1926 to 1931, the school trained flight surgeons as well as performed cadet physical examinations. SAM's brief but important tenure at Brooks Field served as a vital step in the development of aviation medicine and its contributions to pilot safety and training. In 1959, SAM again was relocated to Brooks AFB as part of an Air Force plan to concentrate its aerospace medical research facilities at one location.
    [Show full text]
  • Siloed-Thinking.Pdf
    1 siloed thinking: A Closer Look at the Ground-Based Strategic Deterrent ABOUT FAS The Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is an independent, nonpartisan think tank that brings together members of the science and policy communities to collaborate on mitigating global catastrophic threats. Founded in November 1945 as the Federation of Atomic Scientists by scientists who built the first atomic bombs during the Manhattan Project, FAS is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obligation to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. In 1946, FAS rebranded as the Federation of American Scientists to broaden its focus to prevent global catastrophes. Since its founding, FAS has served as an influential source of information and rigorous, evidence- based analysis of issues related to national security. Specifically, FAS works to reduce the spread and number of nuclear weapons, prevent nuclear and radiological terrorism, promote high standards for the safety and security of nuclear energy, illuminate government secrecy practices, and prevent the use of biological and chemical weapons. The Nuclear Information Project provides the public with reliable information about the status and trends of the nuclear weapons arsenals of the world’s nuclear-armed countries. The project, which according to the Washington Post is “one of the most widely sourced agencies for nuclear warhead counts,” uses open sources such as official documents, testimonies, previously undisclosed information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, as well as independent analysis of commercial satellite imagery as the basis for developing the best available unclassified estimates of the status and trends of nuclear weapons worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Gen. Bernard Schriever Not Only Produced an ICBM Force in Record Time but Also Led the Way to American Dominance in Space
    Gen. Bernard Schriever not only produced an ICBM force in The record time but also led the way to American dominance in Man space. Who By Walter J. Boyne Built the Missiles EN. Bernard A. “Bennie” Schriever, un- questionably one of the most important officers in Air Force history, ranks Galongside the legendary Hap Arnold and Curtis LeMay in terms of long-term ef- fect upon the service and the nation. Fore- most among his many achievements was the development and acquisition in the 1950s and early 1960s of a reliable and operational ICBM force. It was a towering accomplishment— one that helped propel the United States to military dominance in space, as well. No one doubts Schriever’s pivotal role in these two stupendous achievements. In April 1957, his image appeared on the cover of Time magazine, which called him “America’s Missileman.” His official USAF biography flatly proclaims that Schriever is “the archi- tect of the Air Force’s ballistic missile and military space program.” 80 AIR FORCE Magazine / October 2000 Schriever himself is quick to point in New Jersey but returned to Ger- war on Germany and joined the Al- to the critical contributions of other many, settling in Bremerhaven just lies. members of his team, but the fact as a world war was set to explode. The Schrievers, marooned in the remains that he was the man in charge. Schriever, now 90, vividly recalls US, were forced to make the best of Had the ICBM program failed or how, as a child, he would watch the it.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943 – 1983, 29 August 1983
    Description of document: Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943 – 1983, 29 August 1983 Requested date: 09-April-2008 Released date: 23-July-2008 Posted date: 01-August-2008 Source of document: Department of the Air Force 11 CS/SCSR (MDR) 1000 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1000 Note: Previously released copies of this excellent reference have had some information withheld. This copy is complete. Classified documents described herein are best requested by asking for a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) rather than by asking under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE WASHINGTON, DC 23 July 2008 HAF/IMII (MDR) 1000 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC 20330-1000 Reference your letter dated, April 9, 2008 requesting a Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) for the "Guide to Air Force Historical Literature, 1943­ 1983, by Jacob Neufeld, Kenneth Schaffel and Anne E.
    [Show full text]