DOCSLIB.ORG

Con Nombre De Encasillamiento) Pimay (”Esaú/Gersón”) Ramsés II (Azarías/Uzías) Adad-Nirari III Príncipe Amon-Hir-Wenemef Amon/Seth-Hir-Khepeshef 548 A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Con Nombre De Encasillamiento) Pimay (”Esaú/Gersón”) Ramsés II (Azarías/Uzías) Adad-Nirari III Príncipe Amon-Hir-Wenemef Amon/Seth-Hir-Khepeshef 548 A Copyright © 2004 by Charles N. Pope Copyright © por la traducción, Óscar Calle, 2004 www.DomainOfMan.com Cuadro 28 “Cronología del Final del Imperio Nuevo” (Jeroboam II) (Con Nombre de Encasillamiento) Pimay (”Esaú/Gersón”) Ramsés II (Azarías/Uzías) Adad-nirari III Príncipe Amon-hir-wenemef Amon/Seth-hir-khepeshef 548 a. C. (Sadoc) (”Jacob/Coat”) (Meraiot/Pasur) (“Amón/Seth es su Brazo Fuerte”) Príncipe Setne- (Ahitob/Haruz/Cusi) Príncipe Ramsés Osorkon III Khaemwaset Hori / Kashta Paser Assur-dan III Sheshonq V Iuput II (”Merari”) Alara (Jo-Sadac) (Zacarías) Nes-Ptah Merenptah 538 a. C. Año 5 Invasión Ramsés Assur-nirari V de los Pueblos del Mar Tefnakhte Estela de Israel (”Moisés”) Ramsés VIII [Akhenamon] (”José”) Takelot G Bakenranef (”Faraón”) (Jotam) (Bochoris) (Amarías) (Acaz) (Salum) (Mesulam) Rudamon Año 2 (Menahem) Bakenkhonsu Uhhazti Pinudjem Radyan Amenmeses Amenhotep / Takelot III Ma-huhy Ramsés XI Piya-ma- (Pekaía) radus Tiglat- 524 a. C. Seti II Año 9 Año de las Hienas pileser III (”Aarón”) Nabonasar Peftjawybastet Smendes (Azarías/Harim) (Amón I) Pulu (Peka) (”Fineas”) Salmanasar V [Nesbanebdjed] Roma-Roy Amen- Shabaka Humbanigash Haremakhet (”Eliezer”) emnisu Siptah (Pedaías) (Oseas) Nimlot Osorkon F/IV Stefanites ¿Minmose? Pediese Setnakhte Twosret Panehesy Año 18 Año 20 Año 19Año del Renacimiento Akenesh Merodac- (Harhas/Hasra) (”Josué”) Año 16 Baladin Piankh- Deportación Harsiese S (Ma’asías II) Sematawy de Israel Herihor-Siamon (Profeta Isaías) Piye = Sargón II Sematawy- Masaharta Segunda Año 30 Año 11 Segunda Invasión Tefnakhte 507 a. C. Año 28 Mentuemhet Año 5 Año 8 Invasión Año 9 de los Pueblos del Mar de los Pueblos Harkhebi = Djedkhonsuefankh Año 25 del Mar = ¿Bakenkhonsu II? Año 14 Año 28 501 a. C. 500 a. C. Año 11 Año 14 Marduk-zakir-shumi II 1er Ataque de Año 14 Año 17 Senaquerib Año 15 Año 18 - Pascua Celebrada “El Griego” (”Judá”) (Ezequías / Josías) Ia-mani Sin-shari- (Hilcías) (Sebna/Bani) Shebitku = Psusennes (Manasés) ishkun (Hasabnías) Ramsés III Astiages/Giges Menkheperra II = (Nabusazbán) [Wasmu-aria] [Ishtumegu] Shuzubu (”Rubén”) (Sarezer) Senaquerib = “Destrucción 488 a. C. Nabu-sharru-user de Nínive” Nabopolasar Nabucodonosor II [Nabu-ku-durri-user] “Destrucción (Tirhaca) [Wah-ib-ra] de Babilonia” 2o Ataque de Taharqa = Psamético Senaquerib [Nefertem-khu-ra] Ramsés-nakht (Joacaz) Asurubalit II Usermaatra-nakht Año 32 Ramsés IV (Joacim) Necao II / Niku (”Simeón”) Año 53 Smendes II Psusennes II [Wah-em-ib-ra] (”Benjamín”) 476 a. C. Ramsés IX Siamon (”Isacar”) [Nes-ban- [Tit-kheperura] [Nefer-khau-ra] Ush-anukhuru (Profeta (Natanías) Asaradón eb-djed] Asar- (Joaquín) Nekau / Necao Jeremías) Shamash- ¿Montu-hirkhepshef? Ramsés V adón Ramsés-Ankhefenmut (Neco) Pinedjem II shuma-ukin en Menfis Año 8 Año 8 Año 10 Psamético II [Nefer-ib-ra] Ramsés VI (“Leví”) (Matanías/ Asur - 466 a. C. Año 13 (Amón II/Amarías II/Hananías) banipal Ramsés X Sedecías) Amenhotep (Adramelec) en Tebas Año 16 463 a. C. Amenemope Psamético III [Ankhara] Tandamane / Urdamane Asurbanipal Año 18 Humbanigash II 461 a. C. Amel- Teuman / Ardys / Urdi-mulissi (Hofra) Destrucción de Tebas” (Jerusalén) Merodac Tanutamon / Ramsés VII Apries Deportación de Judá [Haa-ib-ra] (Nergal-Sarezer) Leyenda (Ismael II) Nergilissar Negrita - Reyes/Faraones Amasis Subrayado - Reyes de Judá/Israel [Khnem-ib-ra] Nabónido Rojo – Encasillamiento de XII y XVIII Dinastías Azul – Sumos Sacerdotes de Amón Belsasar .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clarity Chronology: Egypt's Chronology in Sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, P1
    Clarity Chronology: Egypt's chronology in sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, p1 Clarity Chronology This Egyptian chronology is based upon the historically accurate facts in the Holy Bible which are supported by archaeological evidence and challenge many assumptions. A major breakthrough was recognizing Joseph and Moses lived during the reigns of several pharaohs, not just one. During the 18th dynasty in which Joseph and Moses lived, the average reign was about 15 years; and Joseph lived 110 years and Moses lived 120 years. The last third of Moses' life was during the 19th dynasty. Though Rameses II had a reign of 66 years, the average reign of the other pharaohs was only seven years. Biblical chronology is superior to traditional Egyptian chronology Joseph was born in 1745 BC during the reign of Tao II. Joseph was 17 when he was sold into slavery (1728 BC), which was during the reign of Ahmose I, for the historically accurate amount of 20 pieces of silver.1 Moses (1571-1451 BC) was born 250 years after the death of the Hebrew patriarch, Abraham. Moses lived in Egypt and wrote extensively about his conversations and interactions with the pharaoh of the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt; thus providing a primary source. The history of the Hebrews continued to be written by contemporaries for the next thousand years. These books (scrolls) were accurately copied and widely disseminated. The Dead Sea Scrolls contained 2,000 year old copies of every book of the Bible, except Esther, and the high accuracy of these copies to today's copies in original languages is truly astonishing.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Examination of the Egyptian Oracle
    Re-examination of the Egyptian Oracle 著者 Fukaya Masashi 雑誌名 哲学・思想論叢 号 30 ページ 88(1)-75(14) 発行年 2012-01-31 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2241/120586 Masashi FUKAYA Introduction Egyptian oracles have long been a popular topic explored by many scholars since the end of the Nineteenth Century. I) The mechanics and the setting of ora­ cle-givings are well known to us. This chiefly owes to a relatively large corpus of extant materials relevant to oracular sessions, particularly from New Kingdom Thebes (c. 1539-1077 BC). However, it is often difficult to distinguish oracles from other forms of divination. Kakosy (1982, 604), for example, defined oracles in comparison with prophecies, as follows: "the border of (the Egyptian) oracle and prophecy is always gray, and many oracles are related to the future. (Also) Oracle often serves to settle situations in the past, and many are in the form of divine decree and convey juridical constraint, whereas prophecy does not have such character". Aune (1987,81) in The Encyclopedia ofReligion notes that one of major differences between oracles and prophecies in the Greek-Roman context is that oracles are given in response to inquiries, whereas prophecies are unsolicited revelations that instigate social change. Kruchten (2001, 609) proposes a better definition that the Egyptian oracle was "requesting a deity to answer some practical question through the agency of its public image". In the same line, Shirun-Grumach (1989) is inclined to stress the 'revelation' of gods, a connotation of visibility. All these definitions, however, seem not to fit evidence available from the New Kingdom onwards perfectly.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass Vessels from the Reign of Thutmose III and a Hitherto Unknown Glass Chalice
    REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF GLASS STUDIES VOLUME 48 • 2006 Paul T. Nicholson Glass Vessels from the Reign of Thutmose III and a Hitherto Unknown Glass Chalice Copyright © 2006 by The Corning Museum of Glass, Corning, NY 14830-2253 Glass Vessels from the Reign of Thutmose III and a Hitherto Unknown Glass Chalice Paul T. Nicholson ver the years, there have been is believed to date from the seventh year of the many reports of glass in Egypt that is queen’s reign.6 Odated earlier than about 1500 B.C.1 Since raw glass of that period was naturally Several of these objects—including the famous greenish or brownish because of impurities such “Bull Mosaic” of Princess Khnumet2 and the as iron, it had to be decolorized in order to pro- lion’s head amulet inscribed for Nubkheperre3— duce colorless objects such as the name beads. are now known to have been made of materials Decolorization was a sophisticated process, and other than glass. The remaining pieces that are virtually all of the glass known from ancient known to us do not appear to represent any de- Egypt was strongly colored, usually in shades liberate and regular production of glass. Instead, of light or dark blue. The notion that colorless they may be the result of accidents that occurred glass could have been manufactured so early, in during the making of faience or frit. Egypt or elsewhere, suggests a remarkable so- There are two pieces of glass that may be rele- phistication in this early glass industry. vant to this discussion, but for the moment, their Chemical analysis of the beads has shown status remains unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival
    Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival Masashi FUKAYA* The Opet Festival is known for its juridical function relating to the oracles of Amun. There are only three texts unequivocally relevant to its oracular sessions, dated to the Nineteenth Dynasty and later. However, other evidence can be associated with this celebration, based on the dates of events. This paper consists of two parts, each re-examining the known evidence and presenting new one. The new sources examined here are mostly related to the installations of high-ranking individuals, such as the high-priests of Amun, the divine wives, and viziers. Unlike juridical oracular sessions, the dates of their ceremonial appointments are rather peripheral in nature, taking place in proximity either to the beginning or the end of the festival. This may hint at the legal assumption of priestly titles prior to religious events and subsequent approval by the god in ceremonial settings, or reward ceremonies when those individuals received special favours from the king for their devotion to him after particular festivals. The author also notes that the accessions of kings were probably modeled on the same pattern in view that some rulers celebrated an accession anniversary at the Opet Festival in their first regnal year when they went on a tour all over Egypt to proclaim their new authority. Keywords: Opet Festival, oracle, decree, installation, appointment Introduction Clear evidence attesting Egyptian oracular rituals is known only from the New Kingdom onwards.1 We have no more than four examples from the Eighteenth Dynasty, all of which pertain to decision-makings on state affairs made by Amun at Thebes.2 Two of them are dated – II Peret 30 and III Peret 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Overseer Shabtis of the High Priest of Amun
    The overseer shabtis of the High Priest of Amun Pinedjem II By Niek de Haan 2021 (second edition) © Niek de Haan – www.shabticollections.com - 2021 1 Table of content 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction to this study 1.2 Who was Pinedjem II? 1.3 Description of the shabtis 2. Museum pieces 3. Private collections pieces and unknown current location Index © Niek de Haan – www.shabticollections.com - 2021 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Introduction to this study This study provides an overview of the overseer shabtis of Pinedjem II. In addition to the published examples I added the shabtis I have come across in the world. I will start of with a short introduction of the ancient owner Pinedjem II and describe his shabtis in general. In the following chapters you will find the museum parallels (chapter 2) and the privately owned parallels (chapter 3). 1.2 Who was Pinedjem II? The High Priest of Amun Pinedjem II, born around 1030/1025 BC, ruled from the south of Egypt from 990 BC till 969 BC, following his brother Smendes II. He was married to both Nesy-Khonsu and Iset-em-Khebi. Nesi-Khonsu was the daughter of his brother Smendes II and his wife Ta-hen-Djehuty. Iset-em-Khebi was his full sister, both children of the High Priest of Amun Mencheppera. He died around Mummy, inner and outer coffin of Pinedjem II © Niek de Haan – www.shabticollections.com - 2021 3 1.3 Description of the shabtis In this document I will only describe the overseers. The overseers are carrying a whip in the left hand to the left shoulder.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: TT 358, TT 320 and KV 39. Three Early Eighteenth Dynasty Queen's
    Title: TT 358, TT 320 and KV 39. Three early Eighteenth Dynasty Queen’s tombs in the vicinity of Deir el-Bahari Author(s): David A. Aston Journal: Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean 24/2, Special Studies: Deir el-Bahari Studies, edited by Z. E. Szafrański Year: 2015 Pages: 15-42 ISSN: 1234–5415 (Print), ISSN 2083–537X (Online) Publisher: Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology, University of Warsaw (PCMA UW), Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego (WUW) www.pcma.uw.edu.pl - www.wuw.pl Abstract: This paper discusses the similarities between TT 358, TT 320 and, in its second stage, KV 39. In terms of both architecture and grave goods, it is suggested that these three tombs were all made for early Eighteenth Dynasty queens. That TT 358 was carved for Ahmose-Meryetamun is certain, whilst the suggestion that TT 320 was cut for Ahmose-Nofretari is defended. Although it is not certain for whom KV 39 may have been designed, the suggestion that it was Ahmose-Inhapi seems plausible. Keywords: Ahmose-Meryetamun, Ahmose-Nofretari, Ahmose-Inhapi, Amenophis I TT 358, TT 320 and KV 39. Three early Eighteenth Dynasty Queen’s tombs... EGYPT TT 358, TT 320 AND KV 39. THREE EARLY EIGHTEENTH DYNASTY QUEEN’S TOMBS IN THE VICINITY OF DEIR EL-BAHARI David A. Aston Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Abstract: This paper discusses the similarities between TT 358, TT 320 and, in its second stage, KV 39. In terms of both architecture and grave goods, it is suggested that these three tombs were all made for early Eighteenth Dynasty queens.
    [Show full text]
  • Černý Mss. 17.125.1-17 Catalogue and Scans
    © The Griffith Institute, University of Oxford ČERNÝ MSS. 17.125.1-17 CATALOGUE AND SCANS. Hand-copies of embossments from sets of Third Intermediate Period mummy braces, chiefly from the Bab el-Gasus cache and now in the Egyptian Museum, Cairo, made by Jaroslav Černý. Luigi Prada (catalogue) Jenni Navratil (scans) INTRODUCTION. The catalogue presents all the 48 hand-copies of pendants and tabs from mummy leather braces found in the first 17 pages of one of Jaroslav Černý’s notebooks, currently preserved in the Griffith Institute Archive, University of Oxford (Černý MSS. 17.125.1-17). The catalogue assigns a number (in bold) to each hand-copy, in a sequence from 1 to 48 that follows the order in which they appear in the notebook. Beside this number, the catalogue also records, in brackets and preceded by the letter Č. (for Černý), the alphabetic or alphanumeric cross-references that Černý himself assigned to almost all of them, matching most items in pairs. No mention of the objects’ original dimensions is found in the notebook, and it is has not been possible to ascertain whether the drawings are all in the same scale. Each object is first identified by type, as either pendant (nos. 1-7, 46-47, with further specification as to what type of pendant) or tab (nos. 8-45, 48). In the case of pendants, the description is limited to the text they bear, as they do not present any images, besides somewhat standardised decorative patterns (rosette in the case of menat-pendants, drop-shaped beads in that of menkhet-pendants).
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Butehamun – Scribe of Deir El-Medina
    Finding Butehamun Scribe of Deir el-Medina ’I would prefer to go on at Deir el-Medina,” Ramses said…“The site is unique...do you realize what we might learn from it? We’ve come across a cache of papyrus and a number of incribed ostrica; they confirm my belief that the people who lived in the village were craftsmen and artists who worked in the royal tombs of the Valley of the Kings.’ (From ’The Golden One’ by Elizabeth Peters) George Wood Kandidat uppsats i egyptologi 15 hp, VT 2016 Campus Engelska Parken Handledare: Sami Uljas 1 Abstract Butehamun was one of the most famous scribes involved in the building of the royal tombs of the Valley of the Kings, and a member of the most illustrious family of scribes there. Butehamun presided over the closure of the Valley and the workers’ village of Deir elMedina, and the move from building new tombs to the preserving and moving (some would say plundering) of the mummies left behind, marking the transition from the New Kingdom to the Third Intermediate Period, as Egypt splintered into what were essentially two realms. By studying the primary sources associated with Butehamun, including letters, reburial ‘dockets’, graffiti, the apparently unique decorations on Butehamun’s coffin, and the finds at his excavated house in Medinet Habu, this paper investigates what can be learned about Butehamun and the reburial project. Some of the sources seem to indicate he experienced some kind of religious crisis, which may have been brought on by feelings of guilt over his treatment of the royal mummies, two of whom were worshipped as gods in Deir el-Medina.
    [Show full text]
  • SETH – a MISREPRESENTED GOD in the ANCIENT EGYPTIAN PANTHEON? a Thesis Submitted to the University of Manchester for the Degre
    SETH – A MISREPRESENTED GOD IN THE ANCIENT EGYPTIAN PANTHEON ? A thesis submitted to the University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Life Sciences. 2012 Philip John Turner 2 1. C ontent s 3 1.1 List of Figures 6 2. Abst ract 7 3. Introduction 13 3 .1 Egyptian Religion 13 3 .2 Scholarship on Seth 14 3.2.1 Seth: Name, Iconography and Character 15 3 .3 Research Problem/Questions 1 8 4 . Seth in Predynastic Egypt 4400 -3100 B.C.E. 21 4 .1 Introduction 21 4.2 The Badarian culture in Ancient Egypt 21 4 . 3 The Amratian (Naqada I) culture in Ancient Egypt 22 4 . 4 The Gerzean (Naqada II) culture in Ancient Egypt 2 5 4.5 Summary 2 9 5. The Early Dynastic Period and the Old Kingdom 3100 to 2181 B.C.E. 32 5.1 Introduction 32 5 . 2 The Unification of Egypt 32 5 . 3 The First Dynasty 33 5 . 4 The Second Dynasty 3 5 5 . 5 The Old Kingdom 3 6 5.6 Seth and the Pyramid Texts 40 5.6.1 The negative texts (69 in number , 9.1% ) 42 5.6.2 The positive texts (20 in number , 2.6 %) 43 5.6.3 The neutral texts (44 in number , 5.8% ) 4 3 5.7 The Sixth Dynasty 4 4 5.8 Summary 4 4 6. The First Intermediate Period and Middle Ki ngdom 2181 -1782 B.C.E. 4 6 6.1 Introduction 4 6 6.2 The S event h D ynas t y 4 6 6.3 The Ei ght h and Nineth Dynasties 4 8 6.4 The Tent h Dynas t y 4 8 6.5 The El eventh D ynas t y 4 8 6.6 The Twel fth Dynasty 4 9 6.7 The C o ffin Tex ts 51 6.7.1 The negative texts (72 in number , 6.0% ) 52 6.7.2 The posi tive t exts (27 in number , 2.0% ) 53 6.7.3 The neutral tex ts (32 in numbe r, 3.0% ) 53 6.8 Summary 53 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass Working, Use and Discard
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Glass Working, Use and Discard Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2w17t0cw Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Author Nicholson, Paul Publication Date 2011-06-04 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California GLASSWORKING, USE AND DISCARD الزجاج، استخدامه والتخلص منه Paul T. Nicholson EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Material Culture University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Nicholson, 2011, Glassworking, Use and Discard. UEE. Full Citation: Nicholson, Paul T., 2011, Glassworking, Use and Discard. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz00289zd5 1081 Version 1, June 2011 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz00289zd5 GLASSWORKING, USE AND DISCARD الزجاج، استخدامه والتخلص منه Paul T. Nicholson Glasbearbeitung, Gebrauch und Entsorgung Verre, utilisation et écart Glass in ancient Egypt appeared in the New Kingdom. It was a novel and highly prized material, which quickly found favor with the elite. The first known glass sculpture in the round depicted the Egyptian ruler Amenhotep II. The purposes for which glass was used overlap with those traditionally known for objects made in faience, and both materials can be regarded as artificial versions of semiprecious stones, notably turquoise, lapis lazuli, and green feldspar. The techniques by which glass was worked in the Pharaonic period fall into two broad groups—the forming of vessels around a friable core, which was subsequently removed, and the casting of glass in molds to make solid objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Libyan’ Settlers: Setting the Scene
    1 Political turmoil and ‘Libyan’ settlers: setting the scene Histories of eras before the Saite Dynasty (26th Dynasty) in ancient Egypt have been largely based on Egyptian evidence, in spite of its inherent distortions and biases, as this has been the only major source available. With the Saite Period there is for the fi rst time a much broader range of archaeological and written evidence from outside the borders of the country as well as the traditional Egyptian sources. The Assyrian prisms, Babylonian and Persian sources and the accounts of the Classical authors allow cross-referencing and contribute to our understanding of this era. Particularly notable are the narratives of Herodotus which are still an important source on Saite Egypt and have been especially dominant in establishing a history of this period in modern accounts. Although caution is required when evaluating data from Herodotus ’ s Histories , 1 there is much to be gleaned from a judicious study of his works. In addition, the dates for the 26th Dynasty are well established, tied as they are to the fi rm chronologies of Greece, Babylonia and Persia. The Saite reunifi cation of Egypt in the mid-seventh century BC appears to have brought an end to the Third Intermediate Period and the occupa- tion of Egypt fi rstly by the Kushites and then later by the Assyrians. This so-called Intermediate era was a time of diminished centralised power, political fragmentation and the appearance of rulers of non-Egyptian extraction. It resulted in signifi cant changes in society and culture and represents a distinct phase in the history of ancient Egypt.
    [Show full text]
  • The Personnel of Khonsu During the Third Intermediate Period at Thebes: a Prosopographical Study of the 21St Dynasty
    The Personnel of Khonsu During the Third Intermediate Period at Thebes: A Prosopographical Study of the 21st Dynasty By Alba María Villar Gómez Submitted to the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degreeof Doctor of Philosophy Tesis doctoral Doctorado en Estudios del Mundo Antiguo Departamento de Historia Antigua, Historia MedievalyPaleografía y Diplomática, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Abril 2015 Supervisors - Dr. John H. Taylor (Assistant Keeper Ancient Egypt of the Department of Ancient Egypt and Sudan of the British Museum) - Professor Dr. Joaquín Mª Córdoba Zoilo (Catedrático de Historia Antigua, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) Cover and back cover image: Falcon-headed standart depicting the god Khonsu; Graffiti No. 21 from the roof of the Khonsu Temple at Karnak (Jacquet-Gordon 2003). This page image: Front view of the Khonsu temple at Karnak. Author’s personal picture SUMMARY The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to make a prosopographical reconstruction of the Theban personnel of Khonsu during 21st Dynasty as a means to understand the role played by their members both as servants of the different forms of Khonsu and as part of the cultic and administrative domains at Thebes. Although my research initially included the servants of this god during the whole Third Intermediate period throughout Egypt, the outstanding interpretations suggested by the variety of materials collected forced me to demarcate the limits of this dissertation. In this regard, I present a methodological proposal as well as a part of the results of a further reseach, whose main lines are summarised at the end of the dissertation.
    [Show full text]