Part 175—Award Term for Trafficking in Persons

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Part 175—Award Term for Trafficking in Persons Pt. 175 2 CFR Ch. I (1–1–21 Edition) PARTS 171–174 [RESERVED] tribe or foreign public entity, if fund- ing could be provided under the award PART 175—AWARD TERM FOR to a private entity as a subrecipient. (b) The award term that an agency TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS must include, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, is: Sec. 175.5 Purpose of this part. I. Trafficking in persons. 175.10 Statutory requirement. a. Provisions applicable to a recipient that is 175.15 Award term. a private entity. 175.20 Referral. 1. You as the recipient, your employees, 175.25 Definitions. subrecipients under this award, and sub- AUTHORITY: 22 U.S.C. 7104(g); 31 U.S.C. 503; recipients’ employees may not— 31 U.S.C. 1111; 41 U.S.C. 405; Reorganization i. Engage in severe forms of trafficking in Plan No. 2 of 1970; E.O. 11541, 35 FR 10737, 3 persons during the period of time that the CFR, 1966–1970, p. 939. award is in effect; ii. Procure a commercial sex act during the SOURCE: 72 FR 63783, Nov. 13, 2007, unless period of time that the award is in effect; or otherwise noted. iii. Use forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award. § 175.5 Purpose of this part. 2. We as the Federal awarding agency may This part establishes a Government- unilaterally terminate this award, without wide award term for grants and cooper- penalty, if you or a subrecipient that is a ative agreements to implement the re- private entity — quirement in paragraph (g) of section i. Is determined to have violated a prohibi- tion in paragraph a.1 of this award term; or 106 of the Trafficking Victims Protec- ii. Has an employee who is determined by tion Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 the agency official authorized to terminate U.S.C. 7104(g)). the award to have violated a prohibition in paragraph a.1 of this award term through § 175.10 Statutory requirement. conduct that is either— In each agency award (i.e., grant or A. Associated with performance under this cooperative agreement) under which award; or B. Imputed to you or the subrecipient funding is provided to a private entity, using the standards and due process for im- section 106(g) of the TVPA, as amend- puting the conduct of an individual to an or- ed, requires the agency to include a ganization that are provided in 2 CFR part condition that authorizes the agency 180, ‘‘OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Govern- to terminate the award, without pen- mentwide Debarment and Suspension (Non- alty, if the recipient or a sub- procurement),’’ as implemented by our agen- recipient— cy at [agency must insert reference here to its (a) Engages in severe forms of traf- regulatory implementation of the OMB guide- ficking in persons during the period of lines in 2 CFR part 180 (e.g., ‘‘2 CFR part XX’’)]. time that the award is in effect; b. Provision applicable to a recipient other (b) Procures a commercial sex act than a private entity. We as the Federal during the period of time that the awarding agency may unilaterally terminate award is in effect; or this award, without penalty, if a sub- (c) Uses forced labor in the perform- recipient that is a private entity— ance of the award or subawards under 1. Is determined to have violated an appli- the award. cable prohibition in paragraph a.1 of this award term; or § 175.15 Award term. 2. Has an employee who is determined by the agency official authorized to terminate (a) To implement the trafficking in the award to have violated an applicable pro- persons requirement in section 106(g) of hibition in paragraph a.1 of this award term the TVPA, as amended, a Federal through conduct that is either— awarding agency must include the i. Associated with performance under this award term in paragraph (b) of this sec- award; or tion in— ii. Imputed to the subrecipient using the (1) A grant or cooperative agreement standards and due process for imputing the conduct of an individual to an organization to a private entity, as defined in that are provided in 2 CFR part 180, ‘‘OMB § 175.25(d); and Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide (2) A grant or cooperative agreement Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocure- to a State, local government, Indian ment),’’ as implemented by our agency at 20 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:23 Jun 29, 2021 Jkt 253005 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\253005.XXX 253005 OMB Guidance, Grants and Agreements § 175.25 [agency must insert reference here to its regu- § 175.20 Referral. latory implementation of the OMB guidelines in 2 CFR part 180 (e.g., ‘‘2 CFR part XX’’)]. An agency official should inform the c. Provisions applicable to any recipient. agency’s suspending or debarring offi- 1. You must inform us immediately of any cial if he or she terminates an award information you receive from any source al- based on a violation of a prohibition leging a violation of a prohibition in para- contained in the award term under graph a.1 of this award term. § 175.15. 2. Our right to terminate unilaterally that is described in paragraph a.2 or b of this sec- § 175.25 Definitions. tion: i. Implements section 106(g) of the Traf- Terms used in this part are defined as ficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 follows: (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)), and (a) Foreign public entity means: ii. Is in addition to all other remedies for (1) A foreign government or foreign noncompliance that are available to us under governmental entity; this award. (2) A public international organiza- 3. You must include the requirements of tion, which is an organization entitled paragraph a.1 of this award term in any subaward you make to a private entity. to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and d. Definitions. For purposes of this award immunities as an international organi- term: zation under the International Organi- 1. ‘‘Employee’’ means either: zations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288– i. An individual employed by you or a sub- 288f); recipient who is engaged in the performance (3) An entity owned (in whole or in of the project or program under this award; part) or controlled by a foreign govern- or ment; and ii. Another person engaged in the perform- ance of the project or program under this (4) Any other entity consisting whol- award and not compensated by you includ- ly or partially of one or more foreign ing, but not limited to, a volunteer or indi- governments or foreign governmental vidual whose services are contributed by a entities. third party as an in-kind contribution to- (b) Indian tribe means any Indian ward cost sharing or matching requirements. tribe, band, nation, or other organized 2. ‘‘Forced labor’’ means labor obtained by group or community, including any any of the following methods: the recruit- Alaskan Native village or regional or ment, harboring, transportation, provision, or obtaining of a person for labor or services, village corporation (as defined in, or through the use of force, fraud, or coercion established under, the Alaskan Native for the purpose of subjection to involuntary Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1601, servitude, peonage, debt bondage, or slavery. et seq.)) that is recognized by the 3. ‘‘Private entity’’: United States as eligible for the special i. Means any entity other than a State, programs and services provided by the local government, Indian tribe, or foreign United States to Indians because of public entity, as those terms are defined in 2 their status as Indians. CFR 175.25. ii. Includes: (c) Local government means a: A. A nonprofit organization, including any (1) County; nonprofit institution of higher education, (2) Borough; hospital, or tribal organization other than (3) Municipality; one included in the definition of Indian tribe (4) City; at 2 CFR 175.25(b). (5) Town; B. A for-profit organization. (6) Township; 4. ‘‘Severe forms of trafficking in persons,’’ (7) Parish; ‘‘commercial sex act,’’ and ‘‘coercion’’ have (8) Local public authority, including the meanings given at section 103 of the any public housing agency under the TVPA, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7102). United States Housing Act of 1937; (c) An agency may use different let- (9) Special district; ters and numbers to designate the (10) School district; paragraphs of the award term in para- (11) Intrastate district; graph (b) of this section, if necessary, (12) Council of governments, whether to conform the system of paragraph or not incorporated as a nonprofit cor- designations with the one used in other poration under State law; and terms and conditions in the agency’s (13) Any other instrumentality of a awards. local government. 21 VerDate Sep<11>2014 13:23 Jun 29, 2021 Jkt 253005 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\253005.XXX 253005 Pt. 176 2 CFR Ch. I (1–1–21 Edition) (d) Private entity. (1) This term means 176.100 Timely determination concerning any entity other than a State, local the inapplicability of section 1605 of the government, Indian tribe, or foreign Recovery Act. public entity. 176.110 Evaluating proposals of foreign iron, steel, and/or manufactured goods. (2) This term includes: 176.120 Determinations on late requests. (i) A nonprofit organization, includ- 176.130 Noncompliance. ing any nonprofit institution of higher 176.140 Award term—Required Use of Amer- education, hospital, or tribal organiza- ican Iron, Steel, and Manufactured tion other than one included in the def- Goods—Section 1605 of the American Re- inition of Indian tribe in paragraph (b) covery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Recommended publications
  • Including the Dossier of Documents Transmitted to the Court Pursuant To
    Tous droits réservés par la Cour internationale de Justice Al1 rights reserved by the Intcrnstional Court of Justice NO de vente : Sales number INTERPR~TATIONDES TRAIT% DE PAIX CO-JCLUS AVEC LA BULGARIE, LA HONGRIE ET LA ROUMANIE INTERPRETATION OF PEACE TREATIES WITH BULGARIA, HUNGARY AKD ROMANIA COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE M~MOZRES.PLAIDOIRIES ET DOCUMENTS INTERPRÉTATION DES TRAITÉS DE PAIX CONCLUS AVEC LA BULGARIE, LA HONGRIE ET LA ROUMANIE AVIS COXSULTATIFS DES 30 MARS ET 18 JUII-LET 1950 PLEADINGS, ORAL ARGUMENTS, DOCUMENTS INTERPRETATION OF PEACE TREATIES WITH BULGARIA, HUNGARY AND ROMANIA ADVISORY OFI.1'IOSS OF RIAIlCH 30th AXI) JULY 18th, 1950 SECTION A.-REQUEST FOR ADVISORY OPINION 1.-LETTER FROBI THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE INTER- NATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE, THE HAGUE 31 October 1949. Sir, I have the honour to inform you that the General Assernbly of the United Nations, by a Resolution adopted at its Swo hundred and thirty-fifth Plenarp Meeting held on 22 October 1949, in con- nexion with the question of "Observance in Bulgaria, Hungary and Komania of human rights and fundamental freedoms", decided to submit the following questions to the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion : "1. Do the diplomatic exchanges between Bulgaria, Hungary and Roniania on the one hand and certain Allied and Associated Powers signatories to the Treaties of Peace on the other, concerning the implementation of Article 2 of the Treaties with Bulgaria and Hungary and Article 3 of the Treaty with Romania, disclose disputes subject to the provisions for the settlement of disputes con- tained in Article 36 of the Treaty of Peace with Bulgaria, Article 40 of the Treaty of Peace with Hungary, and Article 38 of the Treaty of Peace with Romania ?" In the event of an affirmative reply to question I : "II.
    [Show full text]
  • Talent in Insurance 2015 Czech Republic in Focus
    Talent in Insurance 2015 Czech Republic in Focus UK Financial Services Insight Report contents Czech Republic in Focus • Macroeconomic and industry context • Survey findings 2 © 2015 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. Macroeconomic and industry context 3 © 2015 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. Youth unemployment almost doubled in the Czech Republic, to reach a post-crisis peak of 19.5 per cent in 2012, but fell to 15.8 per cent in 2014 Overall and youth unemployment, Czech Republic, 2008-2014 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Overall Youth (Aged 15-24) 4 Source: OECD © 2015 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. Average wages in the Czech Republic have fallen every year since 2011, and were almost 10 per cent lower than 2008 levels as late as 2014 Growth in average real wages (US$), Czech Republic, 2008-2014 $1,600 30.0% $1,400 25.0% 20.0% $1,200 15.0% $1,000 10.0% $800 5.0% $600 0.0% $400 -5.0% $200 -10.0% $0 -15.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average wages (monthly, US$) Growth in average wages (US$; % annual) Note: Average wages (monthly): average gross earnings per worker per month Growth in average wages (annual): percentage change in hourly wages in US$ over previous period Figures are converted to US$ using an average exchange rate 5 Source: Economist Intelligence Unit © 2015 Deloitte LLP. All rights reserved. The Czech total GWP remained broadly stable between 2008 and 2013; 2014 saw marginal growth in GWP in Czech koruna1 Total gross written premiums in millions US$ and as % of real GDP, Czech Republic, 2008-2013 $10,000 3.5% $9,000 3.0% $8,000 $7,000 2.5% $6,000 2.0% $5,000 1.5% $4,000 $3,000 1.0% $2,000 0.5% $1,000 $0 0.0% 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Gross Written Premium (millions US$) Gross Written Premium as a % of real GDP Note: 2014 data is not available Source: OECD 6 © 2015 Deloitte LLP.
    [Show full text]
  • THE REEM ISLAND GHOST: Framing State Narratives on Terror
    Perspectives THE REEM ISLAND GHOST: Framing State Narratives on Terror By Vivian S. Walker CPD PERSPECTIVES ON PUBLIC DIPLOMACY Paper 5, 2016 i ii The Reem Island Ghost: Framing State Narratives on Terror Vivian S. Walker August 2016 USC Center on Public Diplomacy University of Southern Califonia Los Angeles 1 The Reem Island Ghost: Framing State Narratives on Terror By Vivian S. Walker Published by Notice of Rights Copyright © 2016. All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system now known or to be invented, without prior written permission from the author, care of the USC Center on Public Diplomacy. 2 About the USC Center on Public Diplomacy The USC Center on Public Diplomacy (CPD) was established in 2003 as a partnership between the Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism and the School of International Relations at the University of Southern California. It is a research, analysis and professional education organization dedicated to furthering the study and practice of global public engagement and cultural relations. Since its inception, CPD has become a productive and recognized leader in the public diplomacy research and scholarship community. Having benefited from international support within academic, corporate, governmental, and public policy circles, it is now the definitive go-to destination for practitioners and international leaders in public diplomacy, while pursuing an innovative research agenda. USC received the 2008 Benjamin Franklin Award for Public Diplomacy from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis
    resources Article Instruments of Mineral Deposit Safeguarding in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia—Comparative Analysis Slávka Gała´s 1,* , Alicja Kot-Niewiadomska 2 , Andrzej Gała´s 2 , Julián Kondela 3 and Blažena Wertichová 4 1 Faculty of Geology, Geophysics and Environmental Protection, AGH University of Science and Technology, al. Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland 2 Mineral and Energy Economy Research Institute, Polish Academy of Science, Provision of Mineral Policy, Wybickiego 7A, 31-261 Krakow, Poland; [email protected] (A.K.-N.); [email protected] (A.G.) 3 Institute of Geosciences, Technical University of Košice, Letná 9, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia; [email protected] 4 Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, 17. listopadu 2172/15, 70800 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mineral deposits are essential for the economic, technological and social development. However, to enable them to play an appropriate role in the process of sustainable development, they need to be safeguarded in a comprehensive and systemic manner in the same measure as other elements of the environment. The practice of securing access to areas where the mineral deposits can be found is based on the statement that they can be extracted only in places where they occur. This fact defines the type and scope of instruments for safeguarding prospective deposit areas of minerals and their documented deposits. These issues gained in significance in the EU level in recent years however views on this subject across the Member States still vary. The paper subjects instruments of Citation: Gała´s,S.; Kot-Niewiadomska, A.; Gała´s,A.; mineral deposit safeguarding used in Poland, Slovakia and Czechia to the analysis and multi-criteria Kondela, J.; Wertichová, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Republic Country Profile Czech Republic Country Profile
    Czech Republic Country Profile EU Tax Centre June 2021 Key tax factors for efficient cross-border business and investment involving Czech Republic EU Member Yes. State Double Tax With the following countries, territories and jurisdictions: Treaties Albania Denmark Jordan Morocco Slovenia Armenia Egypt Kazakhstan Netherlands South Africa Australia Estonia Rep. of New Spain Austria Ethiopia Korea Zealand Sri Lanka Azerbaijan Finland People's Nigeria Sweden Bahrain France Rep. of North Macedonia Switzerland Korea Bangladesh Georgia Norway Syria Kuwait Barbados Germany Pakistan Tajikistan Kyrgyzstan Belarus Greece Panama Thailand Latvia Belgium Hong Kong SAR Philippines Tunisia Lebanon Bosnia & Hungary Poland Turkey Liechtenstein Herzegovina Iceland Portugal Turkmenistan Lithuania Botswana India Romania UAE Luxembourg Brazil Indonesia Russia Ukraine Malaysia Bulgaria Iran Saudi Arabia UK Malta Canada Ireland Serbia USA Mexico Chile Israel Singapore Uzbekistan Moldova China Italy Slovakia Venezuela Mongolia Colombia Japan Vietnam Montenegro Croatia Cyprus Most important Limited Liability Company (s.r.o.), joint-stock company (a.s.), European forms of doing Company (SE), Limited Partnership (k.s.), General Commercial Partnership business (v.o.s.), Cooperative. © 2021 Copyright owned by one or more of the KPMG International entities. KPMG International entities provide no services to clients. All rights reserved. 1 Legal entity s.r.o. - minimum registered equity is CZK 1; capital a.s. - minimum registered equity is MCZK 2; requirements SE - minimum registered equity is TEUR 120; v.o.s. - minimum registered equity is not set: k.s. - minumum registered equity is TCZK 5; cooperative - minimum registered equity is not set. Residence and A company is resident if it has been incorporated in the Czech Republic or if its tax system management and control are exercised in the Czech Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in Kazakhstan an Introductory Guide to Tax and Legal Issues 2 Doing Business in Kazakhstan Preface
    Doing business in Kazakhstan An introductory guide to tax and legal issues 2 Doing business in Kazakhstan Preface This publication is intended to provide a useful practical summary of some of the legal and tax issues that investors may face when starting and building a business in Kazakhstan. We hope that it will help investors to avoid common pitfalls and highlight areas where some forethought and planning can prevent problems from arising. Kazakhstan offers many opportunities and is strongly committed to encouraging foreign investment in key sectors of the economy. This guide is split into five sections: 1. Welcome to Kazakhstan 2. Our top 10 tax and legal tips for prospering in Kazakhstan 3. Getting started 4. An overview of tax rules in Kazakhstan 5. An overview of other laws affecting business administration. This guide is a high-level summary of the rules in force as of 1 January 2021. It is not a substitute for comprehensive professional advice, which should be sought before engaging in any significant transaction. It should also be noted that this guide does not cover all taxes in Kazakhstan (of which there are more than 30). Here, we cover only the most important taxes, so advice should be sought as to the actual taxes applicable to any particular business. We wish you every success in this exciting and dynamic environment. Doing business in Kazakhstan 1 Contents 2 Doing business in Kazakhstan Welcome to Kazakhstan . 4 Overview of other laws that affect Highlights ...................................... 5 business administration . 50 System of government ............................ 8 Transfer pricing ................................51 Time .......................................... 8 Employment regulations .........................51 Business hours .................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Commodity Summaries of the Czech Republic 2018
    MINERAL COMMODITY SUMMARIES OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC 2018 STATISTICAL DATA TO 2017 (Data deadline: August 31, 2018) Czech Geological Survey October 2018 Compiled by: Jaromír Starý Ivo Sitenský Dalibor Mašek Tereza Hodková Mirko Vaněček Jaroslav Novák Pavel Kavina Typesetting: Oleg Man Graphic design: Oleg Man Ludmila Richterová Budoš Volák Renata Kachlíková [email protected] www.geology.cz 3 CONTENTS EXPLANATORY NOTES .................................................11 List of abbreviations, symbols and technical units ................................11 Exchange and inflation rates of currencies in which minerals are priced ...............14 Annual inflation rates (%) in the USA (US), the United Kingdom (UK), the Euro Area (EUR) and the Czech Republic (CZ) ............................14 Average yearly exchange rates of CZK against EUR, USD and GBP ...............15 Mineral reserve and resource classification in the Czech Republic and its evolutional comparison with international classifications .....................16 Czech classification .....................................................16 International classifications ...............................................18 Comparison of Czech and international systems of classification ..................20 Conclusions ...........................................................23 INTRODUCTION. .24 MINERAL BASE OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND ITS DEVELOPMENT IN 2017 ........................................27 1. Legal framework for mineral resource use. .27 1.1. Reserved and non-reserved minerals
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in the United Arab Emirates
    LW.com Doing Business in the United Arab Emirates Second Edition Contents A. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................2 I Country Background II Free Zones III Status of Shari’ah Law in the UAE B. esTABLISHING A LEGAL PRESENCE IN THE UAE ...........................3 I Incorporating a Local Entity II Opening a Branch or Representative Office (Outside a Free Zone) III Setting up a Free Zone Entity IV Holding Companies V Commercial Agency Relationship C. GeNERAL LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS .................................................7 I Doing Business with the Public Sector II Import & Export Regulations III Foreign Exchange Controls & Anti-Money Laundering IV Bribery and Anti-Corruption V Taxation VI Employment Law VII Immigration VIII Real Property IX Intellectual Property X Data Protection and Privacy XI Governing Law XII Dispute Resolution XIII New Competition Law APPENDICES ............................................................................................15 1 Pros and Cons of Means to Set Up a Legal Presence in the UAE 2 Companies Law and Free Zone Entities ENDNOTES ................................................................................................19 This guide provides an overview of the principal legal issues for foreign (iii) Status of Shari’ah Law in the UAE investors considering doing business in the United Arab Emirates (the UAE). Foreign parties contemplating doing business in the UAE often assume that all aspects of law in the country are governed by
    [Show full text]
  • [Reserved] SUBCHAPTER M—INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC in ARMS REGULATIONS
    Department of State § 120.1 Subchapter L [Reserved] SUBCHAPTER M—INTERNATIONAL TRAFFIC IN ARMS REGULATIONS PART 120—PURPOSE AND 120.42 Subject to the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). DEFINITIONS 120.43 [Reserved] 120.44 Foreign defense article or defense Sec. service. 120.1 General authorities, receipt of li- 120.45 End-items, components, accessories, censes, and ineligibility. attachments, parts, firmware, software, 120.2 Designation of defense articles and de- systems, and equipment. fense services. 120.3 Policy on designating or determining AUTHORITY: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Pub. L. 90– defense articles and services on the U.S. 629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778, 2797); 22 Munitions List. U.S.C. 2794; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Pub. L. 105–261, 120.4 Commodity jurisdiction. 112 Stat. 1920; Pub. L. 111–266; Section 1261, 120.5 Relation to regulations of other agen- Pub. L. 112–239; E.O. 13637, 78 FR 16129. cies. SOURCE: 58 FR 39283, July 22, 1993, unless 120.6 Defense article. otherwise noted. 120.7 Significant military equipment. 120.8 Major defense equipment. § 120.1 General authorities, receipt of 120.9 Defense service. licenses, and ineligibility. 120.10 Technical data. 120.11 Public domain. (a) Section 38 of the Arms Export 120.12 Directorate of Defense Trade Con- Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2778), as amend- trols. ed, authorizes the President to control 120.13 United States. the export and import of defense arti- 120.14 Person. cles and defense services. The statu- 120.15 U.S. person. tory authority of the President to pro- 120.16 Foreign person.
    [Show full text]
  • Investment Guide
    KPMG IN KAZAKHSTAN AND CENTRAL ASIA Investment guide August 2013 kpmg.kz b | Investment guide Contents Country outline 2 Intellectual property Geography and climate Environmental regulations History Transfer pricing Government and politics Other business practices Population and language Tendering process for state companies Currency Use of stamps and seals Banking system Original documents Foreign trade Taxation Capital market Taxation of business entities in Kazakhstan Opening up Taxation of individuals in Kazakhstan Protection of taxpayer rights Key investment considerations 8 Customs Key investment sectors Accounting standards and audit requirements Overall approach Development zones Laws and regulations Investment law Migration regulations 26 Company law Visa requirements Form of foreign investment Legal entities KPMG in Kazakhstan 28 Branch offices and representative offices About us Not-for-profit organizations How KPMG can help? Practical issues Thought leadership Employment legislation Appendices 30 Employment of expatriates Useful links Securities regulation Current Kazakhstan treaties Currency regulation Kazakh content requirements Business activity without forming a legal entity © 2013 KPMG Audit LLC, KPMG Tax and Advisory LLC and KPMG Valuation LLC. All rights reserved. Investment guide | 1 © 2013 KPMG Audit LLC, KPMG Tax and Advisory LLC and KPMG Valuation LLC. All rights reserved. 2 | Investment guide Country outline© 2013 KPMG Audit LLC, KPMG Tax and Advisory LLC and KPMG Valuation LLC. All rights reserved. Investment guide | 3 Geography and climate Table 1. Country snapshot The ninth-largest country in the world and the second largest Capital: Astana state in the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), Kazakhstan is bordered by the Russian Federation to the Area (sq km): 2,724,900 north, the Caspian Sea to the west, China to the east and the former Soviet Central Asian republics of Kyrgyzstan, Population (mln): 17.01 Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan to the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Slovak Republic Cyber Readiness at a Glance
    SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE Melissa Hathaway, Francesca Spidalieri and Anushka Kaushik April 2019 AC INST M IT O U T B T O E P F O G S E R I P D O U LICY ST Copyright © 2019, Cyber Readiness Index 2.0, All rights reserved. Published by Potomac Institute for Policy Studies Potomac Institute for Policy Studies 901 N. Stuart St, Suite 1200 Arlington, VA 22203 www.potomacinstitute.org Telephone: 703.525.0770; Fax: 703.525.0299 Email: [email protected] Follow us on Twitter: @CyberReadyIndex Cover Art by Alex Taliesen. Acknowledgements The Potomac Institute for Policy Studies and the authors would like to thank Alex Taliesen for cover art and Sherry Loveless for editorial and design work. SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 2 1 . NATIONAL STRATEGY . .9 . 2 . INCIDENT RESPONSE . 16 . 3 . E-CRIME AND LAW ENFORCEMENT . 21. 4 . INFORMATION SHARING . 24 . 5 . INVESTMENT IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT . 26 6 . DIPLOMACY AND TRADE . 30 . 7 . DEFENSE AND CRISIS RESPONSE . 33 CRI 2 .0 BOTTOM LINE . .36 . ENDNOTES . 37. ABOUT THE AUTHORS . 47 . SLOVAK REPUBLIC CYBER READINESS AT A GLANCE Country Population 5,440 million Population Growth 0 .17% GDP at market prices (current $US) $95,769 billion (ranked 64th in 2017) GDP Growth 3 .4% Year Internet Introduced 1992 National Cyber Security Strategy 2008, 2015 Internet Domain(s) .cs and .sk Internet users per 100 users 81 .6 Fixed broadband subscriptions per 100 users 25 .8 Mobile cellular subscriptions per 100 users 130 .7 Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Development and Connectivity Standing International Telecommunications World Economic Forum’s Union (ITU) 46 Networked Readiness Index (NRI) 47 ICT Development Index (IDI) Sources: World Bank (2017), ITU (2017), and NRI (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Reserved Seats, Political Parties, and Minority Representation
    This article was downloaded by: [University of Konstanz] On: 06 July 2015, At: 02:21 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG Ethnopolitics: Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reno20 Reserved Seats, Political Parties, and Minority Representation Christina Isabel Zubera a Fachbereich Politik- und Verwaltungswissenschaft, Universität Konstanz, Germany Published online: 16 Apr 2015. Click for updates To cite this article: Christina Isabel Zuber (2015) Reserved Seats, Political Parties, and Minority Representation, Ethnopolitics: Formerly Global Review of Ethnopolitics, 14:4, 390-403, DOI: 10.1080/17449057.2015.1032007 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2015.1032007 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]