DOCSLIB.ORG

Tva-Final-Integrated-Resource-Plan-Eis-Volume-1.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tva-Final-Integrated-Resource-Plan-Eis-Volume-1.Pdf Integrated Resource Plan 2015 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 - MAIN TEXT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Integrated Resource Plan Document Type: EIS – Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Impact Statement Project Name: Integrated Resource Plan Project Number: 2014-2 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement July 2015 Proposed action: Integrated Resource Plan Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority For further information on the EIS, For further information on the project, contact: contact: Charles P. Nicholson Gary S. Brinkworth NEPA Compliance Integrated Resource Plan Project Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, WT 11D 1101 Market St., MR 3K-C Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Chattanooga, TN 47402 Phone: 865-632-3582 Phone: 423-751-2193 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) proposes to update its 2011 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to determine how it will meet the electrical needs of its customers over the next 20 years and fulfill its mission of low-cost, reliable power, environmental stewardship and economic development. Planning process steps included: 1) determining the future need for power; 2) identifying potential supply-side options for generating power and demand- side options for reducing the need for power; 3) developing a range of planning strategies encompassing different approaches, targets and emphasized resources; and 4) identifying a range of future conditions (scenarios) used in evaluating the strategies. Capacity expansion plans (portfolios) were then developed for each combination of strategies and scenarios, and these are evaluated for financial, risk, environmental, system flexibility and economic criteria. Five planning strategies, A – Reference Plan, B – Meet an Emission Target, C – Focus on Long-Term, Market Supplied Resources, D – Maximize Energy Efficiency and E – Maximize Renewables, a No Action Baseline Case alternative, and the Target Power Supply, the preferred alternative based on a combination of A, B and C, are analyzed. Under all alternative strategies and the Target Power Supply, a minimal amount of new baseload generation is added, coal-fired generation decreases and reliance on renewable and demand-side resources increases. Emissions of air pollutants, the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions and generation of coal waste decrease under all strategies. For most environmental resources, the impacts are greatest for the No Action alternative except for the land area required for new generating facilities, which is greater for the action alternatives, particularly Strategy E. INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN – 2015 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Summary Summary INTRODUCTION The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) has developed the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) and associated programmatic supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) to address the demand for power in the TVA service area, the resource options available for meeting that demand, and the potential environmental, economic and operating impacts of these options. The IRP will serve as a roadmap for meeting the energy needs of TVA’s customers over the next 20 years. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is the largest producer of public power in the United States. With a generating capability of 37,000 megawatts, TVA provides wholesale power to 155 local power companies and directly sells power to 59 large industrial and federal customers. TVA’s power system serves 9 million people in a seven-state, 80,000-square-mile region (Figure 1). Figure 1 The TVA service area and generating facilities. S-1 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN – 2015 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Summary Purpose and Need Like other utilities, TVA develops power supply plans. This planning process includes forecasting the demand for power and developing capacity expansion plans. TVA completed an IRP and associated EIS in 2011. Several changes in the power industry, both regionally and nationally, have led TVA to develop this new IRP and associated supplemental EIS. When completed, the new IRP will update and replace the 2011 IRP. The purpose of the IRP and EIS processes is to evaluate TVA’s current energy resource portfolio and alternative future portfolios of energy resource options at a least system-wide cost to meet the future electrical energy needs of the TVA region while taking into account TVA’s mission of energy, environmental stewardship and economic development. Energy resource options include the means by which TVA generates or purchases electricity, transmits that electricity to customers and influences the end use of that electricity through energy efficiency and demand response programs. As part of the IRP and EIS processes, TVA evaluated the future demand for electricity by its customers, characterized potential supply- and demand-side options for meeting future demand and assembled these options into planning strategies and capacity expansion plans or portfolios. TVA then evaluated the strategies for several criteria including capital and fuel costs, risk, reliability, compliance with existing and anticipated future regulations, environmental impacts and flexibility in adapting to changing future conditions. Following public review of the Draft IRP and SEIS, TVA has considered and addressed the public comments on the Draft IRP and SEIS, conducted further evaluations and has issued the Final IRP and SEIS. These reports identify TVA’s preferred resource planning strategy. TVA’s Board of Directors will decide whether to approve staff’s recommended plan or some other plan. Public Participation TVA conducted public scoping for the IRP and associated SEIS in October 2013 with the publication of the Notice of Intent in the Federal Register. TVA simultaneously issued news releases, posted notice on the project website and sent letters about the project to interested parties. During the 33-day scoping period, TVA held public scoping meetings at two locations and by webinar. About 45 people attended these meetings in person and about 50 participated by webinar. TVA received a total of 1,156 individual scoping comments. About 96 percent of the comments were from individuals with the remainder from organizations, businesses and state and federal agencies. Most of the comments from individuals were form letters and emails submitted in response to two advocacy campaigns. Comments from the largest of these campaigns thanked TVA for recent coal plant retirement decisions, urged TVA to prioritize the use of solar and wind energy, increase energy efficiency efforts and work to reduce the local economic impacts of coal plant retirements. Comments from the other campaign cited the abundance and stable cost of coal, the high capacity factor of coal plants, the employment provided by the use of coal and coal’s contribution of low and stable rates. Scoping comments addressed a wide range of IRP- related topics including potential energy resource options, impacts of power system operations and aspects of the integrated resource planning process. Results of the scoping process are available in the IRP EIS Scoping Report issued in June, 2014. To gain additional input, TVA established an IRP Working Group to more actively engage stakeholders throughout the development of the IRP. The 18-member group is comprised of representatives of state agencies, the Department of Energy, distributors of TVA power, S-2 INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLAN – 2015 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Summary industrial groups, academia, and energy and environmental non-governmental organizations. The members were expected to represent their constituencies and report to them on the IRP process, as well as provide input to TVA on the process. The group met at one- to two-month intervals beginning in November 2013. Additional information about the review group is available at http://www.tva.com/environment/reports/irp/index.htm. TVA held quarterly public briefings to educate the general public on the IRP planning process and to present results of major planning steps. Participants could attend these meeting in person or by web conference. The Draft IRP and SEIS were issued for public review and comment in March 2015. TVA held seven public meetings during the comment period. Comments were also accepted through an online form, by email, and by letter. TVA received about 200 unique comment submissions from about 2,400 people. TVA carefully reviewed the comments and responded to them in a comment response report. TVA’S RESOURCE PLANNING PROCESS TVA chose to employ a scenario planning approach in the IRP. The major steps in this approach include identifying the future need for power, developing scenarios and strategies, determining potential supply-side and demand-side energy resource options, developing portfolios associated with the strategies and ranking the strategies and portfolios. Need for Power The need for additional power is based on forecasts of the demand for power over the next 20 years and the ability of TVA’s existing energy resources to meet the forecasted demand. Demand forecasts are based on complex mathematical models that link electricity sales to regional economic activity, customer retention, the price of electricity, the price of substitute fuels and other factors for the residential, commercial and industrial sectors. The results are forecasts of peak load (the maximum amount of power used at a given
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,” Dated April 1995 (1995 SFES-OL-1)
    NUREG-0498 Supplement 2, Vol. 1 Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Supplement 2 Final Report Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as books, NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room at journal articles, transactions, Federal Register notices, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released Federal and State legislation, and congressional reports. records include, to name a few, NUREG-series Such documents as theses, dissertations, foreign reports publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; may be purchased from their sponsoring organization. NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative Copies of industry codes and standards used in a reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are and their attachments. maintained at— The NRC Technical Library NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC Two White Flint North regulations, and Title 10, “Energy,” in the Code of 11545 Rockville Pike Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Rockville, MD 20852–2738 of these two sources. 1. The Superintendent of Documents These standards are available in the library for reference U.S. Government Printing Office use by the public. Codes and standards are usually Mail Stop SSOP copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating Washington, DC 20402–0001 organization or, if they are American National Standards, Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov from— Telephone: 202-512-1800 American National Standards Institute nd Fax: 202-512-2250 11 West 42 Street 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee River and Tributaries Commerical River Terminals
    TENNESSEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMMERICAL RIVER TERMINALS MILES OWNER OR TYPE OF MECHANICAL RAIL ABOVE LOCATION SHELTER REMARKS OPERATOR FREIGHT APPLIANCES CONNECTIONS MOUTH TENNESSEE RIVER Permanently moored Office 0.1 L Paducah, KY Ingram Barge Co. None dock barge and marine None Towing Company Building ways 0.2 L Paducah, KY Paducah Scrap Inactive None Floating portable crane CSX James Marine Shopboat; 0.5 L Paducah, KY Fuel Incline ramp to dock None Service to floating craft Midstream Service Warehouse Boat office and storage 0.5 L Paducah, KY MG Transport Service None None None barge Shopboat; 0.8 L Paducah, KY Paducah River Service Fuel Dry Dock None Midstream fueling service Warehouse Petroleum Storage CSX & IC 1.1 L Paducah, KY Trans-Montaigne, Inc Pipelines with boom One steel dolphin Products tanks Railroad Petroleum CSX & IC 1.1 L Paducah, KY Gulf Oil Co (ITAPCO) Pipelines Two cell & one cell dolphin Products Railroad 1.2 L Paducah, KY James Diesel Service None Shopboat Dry Dock None Barge and towboat repair Lone Star Industries, 1.3 L Paducah, KY Bulk cement Silos Pipeline & crane CSX Four mooring cells Inc Paducah McCracken Boat office and storage 1.4 L Paducah, KY Misc. freight Shopboat None County River Port barge Petroleum 1.5 L Paducah, KY Trans-Montaigne, Inc Pipelines Two dolphins Products Boat office and storage 1.8 L Paducah, KY Bluegrass Marine None None None Towing Company barge Paducah McCracken 2.1 L Paducah, KY Sand & gravel Warehouse Conveyor & crane IC Railroad County River Port R: Right Decending Bank L: Left Decending Bank SHEET A-1 TENNESSEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMMERICAL RIVER TERMINALS MILES ABOVE OWNER OR TYPE OF MECHANICAL RAIL LOCATION SHELTER REMARKS MOUTH OPERATOR FREIGHT APPLIANCES CONNECTIONS Consolidated Grain 2.4 L Paducah, KY Grain None Cover Conveyor P&L & Barge Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations
    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
    [Show full text]
  • TVA 2011 Environmental Assessment
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Watts Bar Fossil Plant Deconstruction Project Number: 2011-16 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WATTS BAR FOSSIL PLANT DECONSTRUCTION Rhea County, Tennessee PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY JUNE 2011 Direct comments to: Amy B. Henry NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee Phone: 865-632-4045 Fax: 865-632-3451 E-mail: [email protected] Page intentionally blank Final Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................................. 1 1.1. The Decision ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Other Pertinent Environmental Reviews or Documentation ..................................................... 3 1.4. Project Scoping ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.5. Necessary Federal Permits or Licenses .................................................................................. 5 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION .................................................... 7 2.1. Alternatives ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Financing of Tva
    THE FINANCING OF TVA ARNOLD R. JoNEs* INTRODUCTION The Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) investment in power, flood control, navigation, chemical, and other fixed assets exceeds two and a half billion dollars. Capital expenditures are expected to reach $i6o million in the current fiscal year -i 9 6i-and will probably exceed $200 million next year. Capital expenditures of about the same range are expected during each year for the foreseeable future. Power revenue in fiscal 196o was $242 million; fertilizer revenue was $17 million. Expendi- tures for operation and maintenance of all programs were $i7o million last year but will increase steadily as the power system and other activities grow. These figures offer a glimpse of the size of TVA's financing responsibility. Large as the expenditures are, they are dwarfed by those of many government agencies. It is not, however, the size of TVA's expenditures that is of most interest. The interest in TVA's financing centers on its methods and policies; for a government agency, they have been unique. TVA now has three sources of funds: (i) appropri- ations, (2) revenues, and (3) electric power bonds. Each source will be discussed in this paper. The fact that TVA may use its revenues and bond proceeds without an- nual appropriation by Congress is of great importance in the stability of its self- financed activities. It is the purpose of this article to review these methods and policies, past and future, identifying the important ways in which they are unique and have contributed to effective management. I SCOPE OF OPFAATIONS I.
    [Show full text]
  • FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hamilton and Rhea Counties, Tennessee and Limestone County, Alabama
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Draft Environmental Assessment Project Name: Fukushima Response Strategy Project Number: 2012-12 FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hamilton and Rhea Counties, Tennessee and Limestone County, Alabama Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee March 2013 This page intentionally left blank Symbols, Acronyms, and Abbreviations Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Related Environmental Reviews .............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 6 1.5 Necessary Permits or Licenses ............................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Description of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 The No Action Alternative .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NRC Collection of Abbreviations
    I Nuclear Regulatory Commission c ElLc LI El LIL El, EEELIILE El ClV. El El, El1 ....... I -4 PI AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. 0. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica- tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu- ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro- ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro- chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula- tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service Include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Documents available from public and special technical libraries include all open literature items, such as books, journal articles, and transactions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1975 The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974 Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Tyrel Gilce Jr., "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1975. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/934 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. entitled "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. John B. Rehder, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Leonard W. Brinkman Jr., Edwin H. Hammond Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyre1 Gi1ce Moore, Jr •• entitled tiThe Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Fishing
    Bank Fishing The following bank fishing locations were compiled by 4. Fish are very sensitive to sounds and shadows and can TWRA staff to inform anglers of areas where you can fish see and hear an angler standing on the bank. It is good without a boat. The types of waters vary from small ponds to fish several feet back from the water’s edge instead and streams to large reservoirs. You might catch bluegill, of on the shoreline and move quietly, staying 20 to 30 bass, crappie, trout, catfish, or striped bass depending on feet away from the shoreline as you walk (no running) the location, time of year, and your skill or luck. from one area to the other. Point your rod towards the All waters are open to the public. Some locations are sky when walking. Wearing clothing that blends in privately owned and operated, and in these areas a fee is re- with the surroundings may also make it less likely for quired for fishing. It is recommended that you call ahead if fish to be spooked. you are interested in visiting these areas. We have included 5. Begin fishing (casting) close and parallel to the bank these fee areas, because many of them they are regularly and then work out (fan-casting) toward deeper water. stocked and are great places to take kids fishing. If you’re fishing for catfish, keep your bait near the bottom. Look around for people and obstructions Bank Fishing Tips before you cast. 1. Fish are often near the shore in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of Nuclear Facility Siting Using Coalition Opportunity Structures and the Advocacy Coalition Framework
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By KUHIKA GUPTA Norman, Oklahoma 2013 ORDER IN A CHAOTIC SUBSYSTEM: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF NUCLEAR FACILITY SITING USING COALITION OPPORTUNITY STRUCTURES AND THE ADVOCACY COALITION FRAMEWORK A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE BY ______________________________ Dr. Hank C. Jenkins-Smith, Chair ______________________________ Dr. Carol L. Silva, Co-Chair ______________________________ Dr. Christopher M. Weible ______________________________ Dr. Deven E. Carlson ______________________________ Dr. Jill A. Irvine © Copyright by KUHIKA GUPTA 2013 All Rights Reserved. Dedication For my incredible parents, Anil and Alpana Gupta, for making all of this possible, and my husband, Joseph T. Ripberger, for being a constant inspiration. Acknowledgements This dissertation would not be possible were it not for the invaluable support I have received throughout my journey as an undergraduate at Delhi University in India, a graduate student at the University of Warwick in England, and my pursuit of a doctorate at the University of Oklahoma in the United States. During my time at Delhi University, Ramu Manivannan was an amazing mentor who taught me the value of making a difference in both academia and the real world. My greatest debt is to Hank Jenkins-Smith and Carol Silva at the University of Oklahoma, whose encouragement, guidance, and intellectual advice has made this journey possible. I am deeply grateful for their unending support; this dissertation would not exist without them.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
    NUREG-0498 Supplement No. 1 Final Environmental Statement related to the operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-390 and 50-391 Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation April 1995 DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica• tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu• ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro• ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro• chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula• tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Degradation of Fuel Oil Flow to the Emergency Diesel Generator
    UNITED STATES REG~kq)~ 0 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 230 PEACHTREE STREET, N.W. SUITE 1217 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 ~*3 DEC 1 1977 In Reply Refer To: RII:JPO 50-438, 50-439 50-259, 50-260 50-296, 50-518 50-519, 50-520 50-521, 50-553 50-554, 50-327 50-328w 50-391, 7U75V6' 50-567 Tennessee Valley Authority Attn: Mr. Godwin Williams, Jr. Manager of Power 830 Power Building Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 Gentlemen: The enclosed IE Circular No. 77-15 is forwarded to you for information. No written response is required. Should you have any questions related to your understanding of this matter, please contact this office. Sincerely, James P. 0 eilly Director Enclosures: 1. IE Circular No. 77-15 2. List of IE Circulars Issued in 1977 cc: J. E. Gilleland Assistant Manager of Power 830 Power Building Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401 / 2-- ~q,) Tennessee Valley Authority -2- W. W. Aydelott, Project Manager Bellefonte Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 2000 Hollywood, Alabama 35752 Stan Duhan 400 Commerce Street E4D112 Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 J. G. Dewease, Plant Superintendent Box 2000 Decatur, Alabama 35602 R. T. Hathcote, Project Manager Hartsville Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 2000 Hartsville, Tennessee 37074 G. G. Stack, Project Manager Sequoyah Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 2000 Daisy, Tennessee 37319 J. M. Ballentine Plant Superintendent Sequoyah Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 2000 Daisy, Tennessee 37319 T. B. Northern, Jr. Project Manager Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P. 0. Box 2000 Spring City, Tennessee 37381 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT WASHINGTON D.C.
    [Show full text]