DOCSLIB.ORG

FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hamilton and Rhea Counties, Tennessee and Limestone County, Alabama

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hamilton and Rhea Counties, Tennessee and Limestone County, Alabama Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Draft Environmental Assessment Project Name: Fukushima Response Strategy Project Number: 2012-12 FUKUSHIMA RESPONSE STRATEGY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Hamilton and Rhea Counties, Tennessee and Limestone County, Alabama Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee March 2013 This page intentionally left blank Symbols, Acronyms, and Abbreviations Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Related Environmental Reviews .............................................................................................. 5 1.4 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 6 1.5 Necessary Permits or Licenses ............................................................................................... 7 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Description of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1.1 The No Action Alternative .................................................................................................. 9 2.1.2 The Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 9 2.1.3 Alternatives Considered but Eliminated From Further Discussion .................................. 14 2.2 Comparison of Alternatives .................................................................................................... 15 2.3 Identification of Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................... 16 2.4 The Preferred Alternative ....................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 3 – AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ..................................................................................... 17 3.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases ....................................................................................... 20 3.2 Solid, Hazardous, and Radiological Wastes .......................................................................... 21 3.2.1 Browns Ferry ................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.2 Sequoyah ......................................................................................................................... 21 3.2.3 Watts Bar ......................................................................................................................... 22 3.3 Floodplains and Flood Risk .................................................................................................... 22 3.3.1 Browns Ferry ................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.2 Sequoyah ......................................................................................................................... 23 3.3.3 Watts Bar ......................................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Wetlands ................................................................................................................................ 24 3.4.1 Browns Ferry ................................................................................................................... 24 3.4.2 Sequoyah ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.4.3 Watts Bar ......................................................................................................................... 25 3.5 Endangered and Threatened Species ................................................................................... 25 3.5.1 Browns Ferry ................................................................................................................... 27 3.5.2 Sequoyah ......................................................................................................................... 28 3.5.3 Watts Bar ......................................................................................................................... 28 3.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................. 29 3.6.1 Browns Ferry ................................................................................................................... 29 3.6.2 Sequoyah ......................................................................................................................... 30 3.6.3 Watts Bar ......................................................................................................................... 30 3.7 Other Environmental Resources ............................................................................................ 30 3.7.1 Radiological Concerns ..................................................................................................... 30 3.7.2 Seismic Risk .................................................................................................................... 30 3.7.3 Visual and Aesthetic Character ....................................................................................... 31 3.7.4 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ................................................................... 32 3.7.5 Groundwater .................................................................................................................... 32 3.7.6 Surface Water and Aquatic Life ....................................................................................... 33 3.7.7 Vegetation and Wildlife .................................................................................................... 35 3.7.8 Transportation ................................................................................................................. 37 CHAPTER 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES .................................................................... 39 4.1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gases ....................................................................................... 41 Environmental Assessment i Fukushima Response Strategy 4.1.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 41 4.1.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Solid, Hazardous, and Radiological Waste ............................................................................ 42 4.2.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 42 4.2.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 42 4.3 Floodplains and Flood Risk .................................................................................................... 43 4.3.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 43 4.3.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 43 4.4 Wetlands ................................................................................................................................ 44 4.4.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 44 4.4.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 44 4.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ................................................................................... 44 4.5.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 44 4.5.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 44 4.6 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................................. 45 4.6.1 No Action Alternative ....................................................................................................... 45 4.6.2 Action Alternative ............................................................................................................. 45 4.7 Other Environmental Resources ............................................................................................ 46 4.7.1 Radiological Concerns ..................................................................................................... 46 4.7.2 Seismic Risk .................................................................................................................... 46 4.7.3 Visual and Aesthetic Character ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2,” Dated April 1995 (1995 SFES-OL-1)
    NUREG-0498 Supplement 2, Vol. 1 Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 Supplement 2 Final Report Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation AVAILABILITY OF REFERENCE MATERIALS IN NRC PUBLICATIONS NRC Reference Material Non-NRC Reference Material As of November 1999, you may electronically access Documents available from public and special technical NUREG-series publications and other NRC records at libraries include all open literature items, such as books, NRC’s Public Electronic Reading Room at journal articles, transactions, Federal Register notices, http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html. Publicly released Federal and State legislation, and congressional reports. records include, to name a few, NUREG-series Such documents as theses, dissertations, foreign reports publications; Federal Register notices; applicant, and translations, and non-NRC conference proceedings licensee, and vendor documents and correspondence; may be purchased from their sponsoring organization. NRC correspondence and internal memoranda; bulletins and information notices; inspection and investigative Copies of industry codes and standards used in a reports; licensee event reports; and Commission papers substantive manner in the NRC regulatory process are and their attachments. maintained at— The NRC Technical Library NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC Two White Flint North regulations, and Title 10, “Energy,” in the Code of 11545 Rockville Pike Federal Regulations may also be purchased from one Rockville, MD 20852–2738 of these two sources. 1. The Superintendent of Documents These standards are available in the library for reference U.S. Government Printing Office use by the public. Codes and standards are usually Mail Stop SSOP copyrighted and may be purchased from the originating Washington, DC 20402–0001 organization or, if they are American National Standards, Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov from— Telephone: 202-512-1800 American National Standards Institute nd Fax: 202-512-2250 11 West 42 Street 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennessee River and Tributaries Commerical River Terminals
    TENNESSEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMMERICAL RIVER TERMINALS MILES OWNER OR TYPE OF MECHANICAL RAIL ABOVE LOCATION SHELTER REMARKS OPERATOR FREIGHT APPLIANCES CONNECTIONS MOUTH TENNESSEE RIVER Permanently moored Office 0.1 L Paducah, KY Ingram Barge Co. None dock barge and marine None Towing Company Building ways 0.2 L Paducah, KY Paducah Scrap Inactive None Floating portable crane CSX James Marine Shopboat; 0.5 L Paducah, KY Fuel Incline ramp to dock None Service to floating craft Midstream Service Warehouse Boat office and storage 0.5 L Paducah, KY MG Transport Service None None None barge Shopboat; 0.8 L Paducah, KY Paducah River Service Fuel Dry Dock None Midstream fueling service Warehouse Petroleum Storage CSX & IC 1.1 L Paducah, KY Trans-Montaigne, Inc Pipelines with boom One steel dolphin Products tanks Railroad Petroleum CSX & IC 1.1 L Paducah, KY Gulf Oil Co (ITAPCO) Pipelines Two cell & one cell dolphin Products Railroad 1.2 L Paducah, KY James Diesel Service None Shopboat Dry Dock None Barge and towboat repair Lone Star Industries, 1.3 L Paducah, KY Bulk cement Silos Pipeline & crane CSX Four mooring cells Inc Paducah McCracken Boat office and storage 1.4 L Paducah, KY Misc. freight Shopboat None County River Port barge Petroleum 1.5 L Paducah, KY Trans-Montaigne, Inc Pipelines Two dolphins Products Boat office and storage 1.8 L Paducah, KY Bluegrass Marine None None None Towing Company barge Paducah McCracken 2.1 L Paducah, KY Sand & gravel Warehouse Conveyor & crane IC Railroad County River Port R: Right Decending Bank L: Left Decending Bank SHEET A-1 TENNESSEE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES COMMERICAL RIVER TERMINALS MILES ABOVE OWNER OR TYPE OF MECHANICAL RAIL LOCATION SHELTER REMARKS MOUTH OPERATOR FREIGHT APPLIANCES CONNECTIONS Consolidated Grain 2.4 L Paducah, KY Grain None Cover Conveyor P&L & Barge Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Take It to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities Was Licenses and Regulations
    Illustrations by Duane Raver/USFWS Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency ke2it2to2the2nkke2it2to2the2nk TennesseeTennessee bankbank fishingfishing opportunitiesopportunities Inside this guide Go fish!.......................................................................................1 Additional fishing opportunities and information..........6 Take it to the Bank: Tennessee Bank Fishing Opportunities was Licenses and regulations........................................................1 Additional contact agencies and facilities.....................6 produced by the Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency and Tennes- Bank fishing tips........................................................................2 Water release schedules..........................................................6 see Technological University’s Center for the Management, Utilization Black bass..................................................................................2 Fishing-related Web sites.................................................... ....6 and Protection of Water Resources under project 7304. Development Sunfish (bream).........................................................................2 How to read the access tables.................................................7 of this guide was financed in part by funds from the Federal Aid in Sportfish Restoration Crappie..................................................................3 Access table key........................................................................7 (Public Law 91-503) as documented
    [Show full text]
  • TVA 2011 Environmental Assessment
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Document Project Name: Watts Bar Fossil Plant Deconstruction Project Number: 2011-16 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WATTS BAR FOSSIL PLANT DECONSTRUCTION Rhea County, Tennessee PREPARED BY: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY JUNE 2011 Direct comments to: Amy B. Henry NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, Tennessee Phone: 865-632-4045 Fax: 865-632-3451 E-mail: [email protected] Page intentionally blank Final Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR ACTION .............................................................................. 1 1.1. The Decision ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Other Pertinent Environmental Reviews or Documentation ..................................................... 3 1.4. Project Scoping ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.5. Necessary Federal Permits or Licenses .................................................................................. 5 2.0 ALTERNATIVES INCLUDING THE PROPOSED ACTION .................................................... 7 2.1. Alternatives ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Financing of Tva
    THE FINANCING OF TVA ARNOLD R. JoNEs* INTRODUCTION The Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) investment in power, flood control, navigation, chemical, and other fixed assets exceeds two and a half billion dollars. Capital expenditures are expected to reach $i6o million in the current fiscal year -i 9 6i-and will probably exceed $200 million next year. Capital expenditures of about the same range are expected during each year for the foreseeable future. Power revenue in fiscal 196o was $242 million; fertilizer revenue was $17 million. Expendi- tures for operation and maintenance of all programs were $i7o million last year but will increase steadily as the power system and other activities grow. These figures offer a glimpse of the size of TVA's financing responsibility. Large as the expenditures are, they are dwarfed by those of many government agencies. It is not, however, the size of TVA's expenditures that is of most interest. The interest in TVA's financing centers on its methods and policies; for a government agency, they have been unique. TVA now has three sources of funds: (i) appropri- ations, (2) revenues, and (3) electric power bonds. Each source will be discussed in this paper. The fact that TVA may use its revenues and bond proceeds without an- nual appropriation by Congress is of great importance in the stability of its self- financed activities. It is the purpose of this article to review these methods and policies, past and future, identifying the important ways in which they are unique and have contributed to effective management. I SCOPE OF OPFAATIONS I.
    [Show full text]
  • Tva-Final-Integrated-Resource-Plan-Eis-Volume-1.Pdf
    Integrated Resource Plan 2015 FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 1 - MAIN TEXT TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Integrated Resource Plan Document Type: EIS – Administrative Record Index Field: Final Environmental Impact Statement Project Name: Integrated Resource Plan Project Number: 2014-2 Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement July 2015 Proposed action: Integrated Resource Plan Lead agency: Tennessee Valley Authority For further information on the EIS, For further information on the project, contact: contact: Charles P. Nicholson Gary S. Brinkworth NEPA Compliance Integrated Resource Plan Project Manager Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority 400 W. Summit Hill Drive, WT 11D 1101 Market St., MR 3K-C Knoxville, Tennessee 37902 Chattanooga, TN 47402 Phone: 865-632-3582 Phone: 423-751-2193 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) proposes to update its 2011 Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) to determine how it will meet the electrical needs of its customers over the next 20 years and fulfill its mission of low-cost, reliable power, environmental stewardship and economic development. Planning process steps included: 1) determining the future need for power; 2) identifying potential supply-side options for generating power and demand- side options for reducing the need for power; 3) developing a range of planning strategies encompassing different approaches, targets and emphasized resources; and 4) identifying a range of future conditions (scenarios) used
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 12-1975 The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974 Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Moore, Tyrel Gilce Jr., "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1975. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/934 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyrel Gilce Moore Jr. entitled "The Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. John B. Rehder, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Leonard W. Brinkman Jr., Edwin H. Hammond Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Tyre1 Gi1ce Moore, Jr •• entitled tiThe Role of Ferry Crossings in the Development of the Transportation Network in East Tennessee, 1790-1974.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank Fishing
    Bank Fishing The following bank fishing locations were compiled by 4. Fish are very sensitive to sounds and shadows and can TWRA staff to inform anglers of areas where you can fish see and hear an angler standing on the bank. It is good without a boat. The types of waters vary from small ponds to fish several feet back from the water’s edge instead and streams to large reservoirs. You might catch bluegill, of on the shoreline and move quietly, staying 20 to 30 bass, crappie, trout, catfish, or striped bass depending on feet away from the shoreline as you walk (no running) the location, time of year, and your skill or luck. from one area to the other. Point your rod towards the All waters are open to the public. Some locations are sky when walking. Wearing clothing that blends in privately owned and operated, and in these areas a fee is re- with the surroundings may also make it less likely for quired for fishing. It is recommended that you call ahead if fish to be spooked. you are interested in visiting these areas. We have included 5. Begin fishing (casting) close and parallel to the bank these fee areas, because many of them they are regularly and then work out (fan-casting) toward deeper water. stocked and are great places to take kids fishing. If you’re fishing for catfish, keep your bait near the bottom. Look around for people and obstructions Bank Fishing Tips before you cast. 1. Fish are often near the shore in the spring and fall.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2
    NUREG-0498 Supplement No. 1 Final Environmental Statement related to the operation of Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-390 and 50-391 Tennessee Valley Authority U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation April 1995 DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS UNLIMITED AVAILABILITY NOTICE Availability of Reference Materials Cited in NRC Publications Most documents cited in NRC publications will be available from one of the following sources: 1. The NRC Public Document Room, 2120 L Street, NW., Lower Level, Washington, DC 20555-0001 2. The Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P. O. Box 37082, Washington, DC 20402-9328 3. The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 Although the listing that follows represents the majority of documents cited in NRC publica• tions, it is not intended to be exhaustive. Referenced documents available for inspection and copying for a fee from the NRC Public Document Room include NRC correspondence and internal NRC memoranda; NRC bulletins, circulars, information notices, inspection and investigation notices; licensee event reports; vendor reports and correspondence; Commission papers; and applicant and licensee docu• ments and correspondence. The following documents in the NUREG series are available for purchase from the Government Printing Office: formal NRC staff and contractor reports, NRC-sponsored conference pro• ceedings, international agreement reports, grantee reports, and NRC booklets and bro• chures. Also available are regulatory guides, NRC regulations in the Code of Federal Regula• tions, and Nuclear Regulatory Commission Issuances. Documents available from the National Technical Information Service include NUREG-series reports and technical reports prepared by other Federal agencies and reports prepared by the Atomic Energy Commission, forerunner agency to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational and Promotional Films
    LEAVE BLANK REQUEST FOR RECORDS DISPOSITION AUTHORITY • JOB NO (See Instructions on reverse) iJ I --/Lfl- ~~1'~(p TO: GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION DATE RECEIVEO NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS SERVICE, WASHINGTON, DC 20408 /t-/It; - ff' 1. F ROM (A,~nc)' or ~atabli'hment) NOTIFICATION TO AGENCY Tennessee Valley Authority In accordance with the provisions of 44 U.S.C. 3303a 2. MAJOR SUBDIVISION the disposal request. including amendments. is approved Governmental and Public Affairs except for Items that may be marked "disposition not approved" or "withdrawn" in column 10. If no records 3. MINOR SUBOIVISION are proposed for dlsoosal. the signature of the Archivist is Media Relations not required. 4, NAME OF PERSONWITH WHOM TO CONFER 5, TELEPHONE EXT. ARCHIVIST OF THE UNITED STATES _~C~ C Ronald E. Brewer 615/751-2520 Z ;:;D ~~ 10 6. CERTIFICATE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE I I hereby certify that I am authorized to act for this agency in matters pertaining to the disposal of the agency's records; that the records proposed for disposal in this Request of page(s) are not now needed for the businessof this agency or will not be needed after the retention periods specified; and that written concurrence from the General Accounting Office, if required under the provisions of Title 8 of the GAO Manual for Guidance of Federal Agencies, is attached. A. GAO concurrence: D is attached; or [!] is unnecessary. B. DATE C. SIGNATURE OF AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE D. TITLE Assistant TVA Archivist 9. GRS OR 10. ACTION SUPERSEDED TAKEN ITEM (With Inc/u.ive Datet or RetenHon Period.) JOB (NARSUSE NO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2005 A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II William Wade Drumright University of Tennessee, Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Drumright, William Wade, "A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2005. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/4321 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by William Wade Drumright entitled "A River for War, a Watershed to Change: The Tennessee Valley Authority During World War II." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Robert J. Norrell, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: William Bruce Wheeler, Kurt Piehler, Charles S. Aiken Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Watts Bar Unit 2
    Tennessee Valley Authority, Post Office Box 2000, Spring City, TN 37381-2000 October 22, 2009 10 CFR 51.92 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Mail Stop: OWFN P1-35 Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-391 Subject: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF TVA FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FSEIS) (TAC MD8303) References: 1. TVA letter dated February 15, 2008, 'Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) - Unit 2 - Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for the Completion and Operation of Unit 2" 2. TVA letter dated July 2, 2008, "Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) - Unit 2 - Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement - Request for Additional Information (TAC No. MD8203)" 3. TVA letter dated January 27, 2009, 'Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) Unit 2 - Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement - Severe Accident Management Alternatives (TAC No. MD8203)" The purpose of this letter is to provide additional information in support of TVA's FSEIS for the completion and operation of WBN Unit 2 as requested by NRC during a site assessment in early October 2009. Printed on recycled paper U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 October 22, 2009 The WBN Unit 2 FSEIS (June 2007) was submitted to NRC on February 15, 2008 (Reference 1). -By letter dated July 2, 2008 (Reference 2), TVA responded to an NRC request for additional information. By letter dated January 27, 2009 (Reference 3), TVA provided the Severe Accident Management Alternatives (SAMA) analysis report for WBN Unit 2. TVA prepared the FSEIS to update the extensive previous environmental record.
    [Show full text]