Authoritarian Communism and Libertarian Communism
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Library.Anarhija.Net Authoritarian Communism and Libertarian Communism Max Nettlau, Federica Montseny Max Nettlau, Federica Montseny Authoritarian Communism and Libertarian Communism 1928 Retrieved on March 31st, 2014 from http://libcom.org/library/ authoritarian-communism-libertarian-communism-max-nettlau Max Nettlau, “Comunismo Autoritario y Comunismo Libertario”, La Revista Blanca (February 1, 1928), VII, No. 113, pp. 513–517; (February 15, 1928), VII, No. 114, pp. 545–550; (March 1, 1928), VII, No. 115, pp. 577–579. Originally written in French, then translated into Spanish by Federica Montseny in 1928 during one of Nettlau’s visits to Spain. Translated from the Spanish translation available online at: http://agitacionrural.no-ip.org/node/68 lib.anarhija.net 1928 Contents Preface: Max Nettlau, or The Choice of Modesty – Federica Montseny 3 Chapter 1 9 Chapter 2 20 Chapter 3 35 2 Preface: Max Nettlau, or The Choice of Modesty – Federica Montseny Blessed are those whose souls are transparent, whose lives are honest, and whose hearts are pure; for theirs is the kingdom of the earth. Blessed are those who believe in human goodness, those who preserve their illusions intact and nourish the hope that for them the doors of life will open. Blessed are those who offer the world their fraternal right hand and friendly visage, those who go with a smile on their lips and cast a light before them. And blessed, too, are those who can love those who can believe, those who can discover within the human wasteland, a tree under which their anxieties concerning their ideal, and their human de- sires for trust and affection, can take shelter. Without goals to aim for and without any figures on the horizon in whom we can crystallize our life and our need for encouragement and for example, what would our lives be? Iconoclasts! We are all iconoclasts. We have overthrown all the idols of clay, the barbarous gods imagined by human barbarism; we have abolished all faiths, which exalted hidden forces and in- eluctable destinies. We have killed the thirst for submission within us, just as we have killed the thirst for domination. We feel a power- ful urge to throw down the pedestals that are currently being built, 3 to prevent the rise of new idols, of a new kind and of a new charac- more healthy it becomes in every domain, great or small, the easier ter. our task will be, which is not that of persuading the whole world Iconoclasts! Yes, iconoclasts with regard to all the icons, irrever- to accept a platform or a counter-platform or to impose our idea of ent towards all worship, heretics against all orthodoxies, demolition freedom on others (can this be done without authority?), but that agents, perpetual revolutionaries against all the bastions of received of conquering, gradually or all at once, the freedom to live our own ideas. When we see a man who speaks to us as if we are schoolchil- lives, which is anarchy (better without a platform, for my part, and dren, who attempts to lead us, who assumes priestly mannerisms let others live their own lives as long as they do not interfere with and a prophetic tone, we cry out with all the power of our voices our way of life, and not to commit acts of cruelty in the heat of re- and all the energy of our spirits. volt or of destruction of the social wealth belonging to others, or Down with the schoolmasters and down with the priests, down monopolizing these objects, etc.!). with the redeemers and down with sterile icons! Down with the The whole world, which will consent to live together harmo- era of messiahs and saviors, of shepherds put at the head of human niously and will be reasonable enough to practice some intelligent herds! Down with the icons, the personifications in wood or in flesh voluntarism and solidarity, will form one big family which one will of human ignorance and powerlessness; down with the icons which, be able to call, in accordance with the ideas of the trailblazers, lib- dead or alive, attempt to assume the role of the directors of our lives, ertarian communism, and the libertarian individualists who are not the depositories of eternal verities, the representatives of absolute vulgarly egotistical and antisocial, will always be welcome among ideas, the holders of religious or moral power over men. the free practitioners of solidarity. But once all the idols are cast down, and our belief in ourselves, The world of authoritarian communism will do what it wants in our will and our confidence, has been firmly established, would and the egotistical individualists will rejoice in its deeds (the NEP it be humanly possible, esthetically and ethically correct, to also already has found some supporters of this type), and if it invades uproot from ourselves that need for moral devotion, for a manifes- the free world, the latter will defend itself; otherwise, we will have tation of what is admirable, a spur to improvement that leads us to admit that there are people who think differently just as there to those outstanding figures of human thought and labor, who in- are those of different races and colors, and each will live inhisown still us with that mixture of fraternal affection, personal pride and way. elective affinity that we feel in the presence of those rare livesthat On such a basis of parallel forces, if they have not yet joined crystallize, in flesh and blood and heart and soul, the ideal ofhuman forces, the old and the new authority, a formidable mass, may yet perfection? be defeated by a great union of all men of good will. It seems to me A man has come among us, into the circle of our lives. A man with unlikely that this can be achieved by means of doctrinaire rigidity. grey hair and the expression of a child. A man of clear soul and pure Max Nettlau heart and broad spirit and a life lived well. A man who has left his 1928 mark on every one of us, a man who seemed to concentrate what is best in us, what we were before and what we want to become. A man who is frank, yes, and simple, as wise as he is modest, as 4 41 which—while a major task—does not pose the task of elaborating modest as a sage who unconsciously and unpretentiously possesses programs that are really impossible to put into practice, but rather the highest degree of the wisdom of humility. that of discovering the best way to lead life itself, the appeal to the And this captivating, profound and supreme modesty is the mod- practice of freedom and the return of that human dignity that is esty that is born from the ignorance of his own worth. The modesty constantly being sacrificed on the altar of authority, proclaiming, based on the unconsciousness of oneself, open like a violet to the finally, happiness and harmony, peace and freedom. face of the world. On its own, as it is theorized in programs and platforms, anarchy A human being before whom one feels no idolatrous servility, cannot overcome the inertia created by authority and its accom- or the moral mendicancy of the disciple, or the annihilation of the plice, routine, in the minds of almost everyone, even those people simple personality overwhelmed by the dominating personality, or who are said to be the most oppressed and exploited and who, for the impulse of repulsion and rebellion that the free spirit feels when this very reason, are assumed to be unconscious revolutionaries. faced with the stern expression of the conceited intellectual. A man The moral collaboration, or at least the silent approval, required of whom one must necessarily admire, whom one must contemplate as all those who in any particular circle, will practice spontaneity and a model and whom one must consider as a living encouragement, a association, will be necessary, and it will also be necessary that no mute invitation to improvement, to emulation, to the gradual ascent one attempts to set himself up as master of the others. Weliketo on the purifying path towards the human ideal. think that good is, after all, stronger in the world than evil. In that An ideal that sometimes seems to come nearer, and comes within case we have to unite ourselves with everything that is good and the reach of our lives, of our sight, of our existence. An ideal without try to create a vacuum around it without evil, until we manage to a categorical imperative, without self-consciousness, and precisely totally eliminate evil. Against the great evil of authority we have to for these reasons ideal and desired. oppose the great solidarity of the good. As much as I love anarchy, Faced with the men of the icons, the men who address us from a I am always pleased by any advances whatsoever in any sphere, priestly position, and the classical gesture of the shepherd among because it is progress, because it will be combined with the sum the mob, our personality rebels and we feel the compulsion of icon- of what is progressive against the sum, that terrible weight, of the oclasm. authoritarian and the routine. Faced with the man of courage, the spiritual man, the man of I do not share that way of viewing the world as a mass of corrup- life, the simple, spontaneous, candid, tranquil man, the real-life ac- tion that should be destroyed and which is not worth the trouble tualization of a human ideal, an ideal that can only be felt by those to bother about, nor do I feel that the anarchists are the only just who believe in goodness, those who have preserved their illusions men who can regenerate the world.