The Sanctification of Marital Sexuality in Newlyweds
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SACRED SEXUAL UNIONS: THE SANCTIFICATION OF MARITAL SEXUALITY IN NEWLYWEDS Krystal M. Hernandez A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS June 2008 Committee: Annette Mahoney, Advisor Kenneth Pargament Anne Gordon i ABSTRACT Annette Mahoney, Ph.D., Advisor A number of religious teachings and spiritually-integrated literature supports viewing sexuality, particularly marital sexuality, as having divine character and significance, and such perceptions of sanctification may facilitate healthy couple functioning. However, few empirical links have been documented among sexuality, marriage, and religion (e.g., Young et al., 1998). Studies on sanctification within the family have focused on the sanctification of marriage (Mahoney et al., 1999) and sexual intercourse in loving relationships (Murray-Swank et al., 2005). This study extends empirical exploration of the sanctification of marital sexuality. Among a sample of 83 newly married individuals, higher sanctification of marital sexuality was positively correlated with greater sexual and marital satisfaction, sexual and spiritual intimacy, investment in the sexual bond, and positive and negative religious coping. Higher sanctification also related to less global distress from sexual difficulties. Hierarchical regression analyses revealed that sanctification of marital sexuality contributed an additional 1% to 17% of the variance in sexual, psychological, and spiritual criteria after accounting for demographic variables and conventional religiousness, with total variances accounted for by the regression models ranging from 28%-53%. Further analysis of two subscales of sanctification revealed that perceiving marital sexuality as sacred tended to contribute to significant variance over and above the perception of marital sexuality as a manifestation of God. Correlations between sanctification and sexual and non-sexual processes have implications for continued research and support the integrated assessment of religion and sexuality in marital therapy. ii To Deborah and Margaret, for your love, support, and continued inspiration. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to express sincere gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Annette Mahoney for her professional guidance and support of this project. Furthermore, I would like to thank my committee members, Drs. Kenneth Pargament and Anne Gordon. I am particularly grateful for my experience as a member of the SPiRiT research team as well as research assistant on the New Arrivals: Passage to Parenthood Study (NAPPS) with Drs. Mahoney and Pargament, as such involvement has helped shape my ideas for this project and served to continually renew my interest in the psychology of religion, and marriage and family life. In addition, I would like to thank Dr. Gordon for her helpful suggestions not only with this current project, but also regarding future research and professional goals. It has been a pleasure to meet with my committee, and I greatly value their support, enthusiasm, and feedback. Special thanks is awarded to the participants of this study, for they have made this project – and one of my aspirations - possible. I am grateful for their time and effort. I would like to acknowledge Doug Haryu for his help during the recruitment phase of the project. I also wish to thank my classmates and members of the SPiRiT research team, as well as members of the BGSU Campus Ministry for their genuine interest in this project, helpful suggestions, and quality discussions which have helped me not just persevere, but thrive throughout this endeavor. Furthermore, I extend my gratitude to my undergraduate Psychology and Theology professors, in particular, at Ohio Dominican University. They have helped spark my interest in integrating these disciplines, and in this topic, in particular. I am so thankful for my experience at ODU, their continued support, and the manner in which they continue to inspire me. iv I must also extend my deepest love and gratitude to my family for their love, faith, prayers, infinite support, and most precious (and needed) moments of laughter. v TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………… 1 REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ……………………………………………………….. 3 World Religions and the Language of the Sanctification of Marriage and Sexuality………………………………………………………………….… 3 Religion, Mating, and the Beginning Years of Marriage ………………………….. 6 The Impact of Religion on Marriages of Varying Duration .……..………………… 9 Religion and Marital Sexuality …………………………………………………..… 13 The Sanctification of Marriage and Sexual Intercourse …………………………… 18 PURPOSE OF THE MASTER’S THESIS ………………………………………………… 23 Theoretical and Empirical Framework of Sanctification ………………………….. 24 Hypotheses ……………………….………………………………………………… 25 Limitations of Prior Research which the Master’s Thesis Addresses ……………… 26 METHOD ………………………………………………………………………………….. 29 Participants ….……………………………………………………………………... 29 Instrumentation: Descriptive Information …………………………………………. 30 Global religiousness ………………………………………….……………. 30 Belief in God …………….………………………………………………... 30 Biblical conservatism ……………………………………………………... 31 Relationship and sexual history …………………………………….…….. 32 Presence of children ……………………………………………….……… 32 vi Page Instrumentation: Predictor Variable ………………………………………………. 32 Sanctification of marital sexuality ………………………………………. 32 Instrumentation – Criterion Variables: Sexual Processes ………………………... 33 Protecting and preserving marital sexuality: Sexual fidelity before and during marriage .…………………………………………….….… 33 Sexual benefits: Sexual frequency …………………………………….… 34 Sexual benefits: Sexual satisfaction ……………………………………... 34 Sexual benefits: Sexual intimacy ………………………………………... 35 Sexual benefits: Problems and distress related to marital sexuality …….. 35 Instrumentation – Criterion Variables: Psychological Processes ……………….. 36 Investment in marital sexuality: Time and effort devoted to creating and maintaining sexual bond in marriage …………………………… 36 Psychological benefits: Global marital satisfaction …………………….. 37 Drawing on psychological resources: Secular individual coping with problems about marital sexuality ..…….……………………….… 37 Protecting and preserving marital sexuality: Divorce proneness ……….. 39 Instrumentation – Criterion Variables: Spiritual Processes …………………….. 39 Spiritual benefits: Spiritual intimacy ………………………………….… 39 Drawing on spiritual resources: Religious individual coping with problems about marital sexuality ……………………………………………. 40 Instrumentation: Qualitative Information ………………………………..……… 41 vii Page Additional Instrumentation ……………………………………………………… 42 Procedure ………………………………………………………………………… 42 RESULTS ……………………………………………………………………………….. 47 Preliminary Data Analyses: Descriptive Statistics ……………………………….. 47 Global religiousness ……………………………………………………… 47 Belief in God …………………………………………………………….. 48 Biblical conservatism ……………………………………………………. 48 Relationship history ……………………………………………………… 48 Sexual history and current activity ……………………………………… 48 Presence of children ……………………………………………………… 49 Predictor variable: The sanctification of marital sexuality scale ………… 49 Criterion variables: Sexual functioning ………………………………….. 51 Criterion variables: Psychological functioning …..…………………..….. 52 Criterion variables: Spiritual functioning ..…………………………..…. 53 Data Analyses: Inferential Statistics ……………………………………………. 53 Bivariate correlations with conventional religiousness …………………. 53 Bivariate correlations with demographic variables ……………………. 54 Correlations among criterion variables ….……………………………… 55 Links between sanctification of marital sexuality and sexual, psychological, and spiritual criteria ……………………………. 55 Regression analyses ……………………………………………………. 57 viii Page DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………………………. 62 Summary ……………………………………………………………………….. 62 Understanding Marital Sexuality through the Conceptual Framework of the Effects of Sanctification ………………………………………………. 65 Personal and relational benefits of the sanctified marital sexual relationship: Sexual, psychological, and spiritual benefits …... 65 Drawing on spiritual and psychological resources ……………………… 68 Investment in the marital sexual bond …………………………………… 72 Protecting and preserving marital sexuality ………………………………. 73 Marital Sexuality through a New Religious Lens ……………………………….. 74 The power of the sanctification of marital sexuality beyond conventional religiousness ………………………………………………………. 74 Qualitative responses ………………………………………………….… 75 Religious beliefs and perceptions can play a positive role in sexuality …. 78 Limitations to the Present Study and Directions for Future Research ….……… 80 Next phase of the study ……………………………………………… 82 CONCLUSION .………………………………………………………………………… 84 REFERENCES ………………………………………………………………………….. 89 APPENDIX A. DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION …………………………………… 99 APPENDIX B. GLOBAL RELIGIOUSNESS …………………………………………. 100 APPENDIX C. BELIEF IN GOD ……………………………………………………… 101 ix Page APPENDIX D. BIBLICAL CONSERVATISM ……………………………………… 102 APPENDIX E. RELATIONSHIP AND SEXUAL HISTORY ………………………… 103 APPENDIX F. PRESENCE OF CHILDREN …………………………………….……. 104 APPENDIX G. SANCTIFICATION OF MARITAL SEXUALITY SCALE …….…… 105 APPENDIX H. SEXUAL FIDELITY ………………………………………………… 106 APPENDIX I. SEXUAL FREQUENCY ……………………………………………… 107 APPENDIX J. SEXUAL SATISFACTION …………………………………………… 108 APPENDIX K. SEXUAL INTIMACY ………………………………………………… 109 APPENDIX L. PERMISSION TO USE THE PHYSICAL/SEXUAL SAFETY SUBSCALE OF THE INTIMATE SAFETY QUESTIONNAIRE (ISQ)