DOCSLIB.ORG

Earth's Energy Budgets

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Earth's Energy Budgets Earth’s energy budgets ESE 101 2016 Global energy balance Incoming Reflected Outgoing solar radiation solar radiation longwave radiation 340 100 240 TOA Atmospheric Atmospheric Cloud reflection window effect 77 40 165 35 Clear Sky 75 Atmospheric absorption 188 23 24 88 398 345 Absorbed Reflected SH LH LW up LW down SW SW F 7.1: Earth’s global energy balance. The energy fluxes through the climate system are global averages estimated from satellite data and atmospheric reanalysis. They 2 are indicated in units of W m− . At the top of the atmosphere, the energy fluxes are 2 best constrained and have errors of order 1Wm− . The errors in surface fluxes, and 2 particularly latent heat fluxes are considerably larger, of order 10 W m− . The indicated fluxes were adjusted within the measurement errors such that the energy balance closes.1 Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 ENERGY BALANCES AND TEMPERATURES 109 ENERGY BALANCES AND TEMPERATURES 109 Surface energy balance @Ts c ⇢ ⇤ S# L" F F div F s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O F 7.2: Absorbed solar radiative flux at the surface. 7.3 LATENTF AND 7.2 SENSIBLE: AbsorbedSurface HEAT solar heat radiative FLUXES fluxes: flux at the surface. bulk aerodynamic formulae F ⇤ ⇢c ⇢C v T T z (7.2) 7.3 LATENT AND SENSIBLES p HEATd k FLUXESk [ s − a( r)] assume transfer coefficient Cd equal to sensible heat and latent energy (not F ⇤ ⇢c ⇢C v T T z (7.2) necessarily true) S p d k k [ s − a( r)] assume transfer coefficient Cd equal to sensible heat and latent energy (not ⇤ necessarily true) FL ⇢LCd v qs qa zr (7.3) k k − ( ) ⇤ assume qs q⇤ Ts over wet surfaces ⇥ ⇤ ( ) F ⇤ ⇢LC v q q z (7.3) L d k k s − a( r) assume q ⇤ q T over wet surfaces 7.4 BOWENs ⇤ RATIO( s) ⇥ ⇤ FS 7.4 BOWEN RATIO Bo ⇤ (7.4) FL F Bo ⇤ S (7.4) FL Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Net downward solar radiative flux at surface @Ts ENERGYc BALANCES⇢ AND TEMPERATURES⇤ S# L" F F div F 109 s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O 90°N ANN 25 100 45°N 225 150 0 250 Latitude 45°S 125 300 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 200 90°N 250 DJF 45°N 25 200 100 200 −2 150 0 250 150 275 W m Latitude 45°S 100 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 200 50 90°N JJA 100 0 45°N 300 250 275 0 Latitude 125 75 45°S 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 200 Longitude W m−2 F 7.2: Absorbed solar radiative flux at the surface. 7.3 LATENT AND SENSIBLE HEAT FLUXES F ⇤ ⇢c ⇢C v T T z (7.2) S p d k k [ s − a( r)] assume transfer coefficient Cd equal to sensible heat and latent energy (not necessarily true) F ⇤ ⇢LC v q q z (7.3) L d k k s − a( r) assume q ⇤ q T over wet surfaces s ⇤( s) ⇥ ⇤ 7.4 BOWEN RATIO F Bo ⇤ S (7.4) FL Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 AbsorbedENERGY BALANCES solar AND TEMPERATURES radiative flux at surface 109 90°N ANN 25 100 45°N 225 150 0 250 Latitude Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 45°S 125 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 200 90°N 100 CHAPTER 4 TOA annual mean albedo a 90°N Total 65 45°N 25 30 0 15 35 Latitude 45°S 70 90°S 0 120°E 120°W 0 0 40 80 F 7.2: Absorbed solar radiative flux at the surface. 7.3 LATENT AND SENSIBLE HEAT FLUXES F ⇤ ⇢c ⇢C v T T z (7.2) F 4.5: Earth’s annual-meanS albedop d k atk the[ s top− ofa( atmosphere.r)] (a) Total albedo, obtained as the ratio of total upward to downward solar radiative energy flux at the assume transfer coefficient Cd equal to sensible heat and latent energy (not topnecessarily of the atmosphere. true) (b) Clear-sky component of the albedo, obtained as the ratio of upward solar radiative energy flux from cloudless regions to total downward flux. All radiative energy fluxes were measured by NASA’s space-based Clouds and Earth’s F ⇤ ⇢LC v q q z (7.3) Radiant Energy System (CERES)L instruments.d k k s They− a( werer) averaged over the 13 years ⇤ 2 fromassume Marchqs 2000q⇤ T throughs over February wet surfaces 2013 prior⇥ to the computation⇤ of the albedos. The right panels show( the) zonal means of the left panels. The dashed red line in the upper right panel is the fit from the heuristic model in the box on p. 103. 7.4 BOWEN RATIO F land and Antarctica. Subtropical desertsBo ⇤ S such as the Sahara also stand out(7.4) as regions of high albedo compared with surroundingFL areas. But otherwise, land– ocean contrasts and other variations of Earth’s surface properties only leave a weak signature on top-of-atmosphere albedo variations. Instead, the dominant albedo variation is the gradual increase from 20% in the tropics, to 45% at ⇠ ⇠ 60◦N/S, to &70% near the poles. This is clearly evident in the zonal-mean albedo (Fig. 4.5a, right panel), which increases nearly symmetrically away from the equator—despite the strongly hemispherically asymmetric distribution of continents. The zonal albedo variations (the variations along latitude belts) are comparatively weak. They correlate with measures of cloudiness, such as cloud water path (Fig. 1.20) and cloud fraction (Fig. 1.22). For example, the albedo is elevated ( 30%) over the subtropical eastern Pacific with its high fraction of low clouds (cf.⇠ Fig. 1.22), and it is reduced over the subtropical western Pacific with its lower cloud water path and cloud fraction. These observations indicate that Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Net longwave radiative flux at surface 110 @Ts CHAPTER 7 c ⇢ ⇤ S# L" F F div F s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O 90°N ANN 45°N 100 75 125 0 50 100 Latitude 45°S 50 150 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 100 90°N DJF 50 25 45°N 100 100 −2 0 50 W m Latitude 125 100 45°S 50 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 100 90°N 0 JJA 45°N 125 125 50 150 0 Latitude 100 45°S 50 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 100 Longitude W m−2 F 7.3: Surface longwave radiation. how does it depend on climate cp Ts Ta Bo ( − ) (7.5) ⇠ L q T q T ⇤( s) − H ⇤( a) assume fixed T T and fixed relative⇥ humidity ⇤. s − a H 7.5 SURFACE ENERGY UPTAKE 7.6 TOP OF ATMOSPHERE ENERGY BALANCE @E ⇤ S# L" div F (7.6) @t TOA − TOA − Surface radiation balance Hartmann (2016) Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Surface sensible heat fluxes @Ts ENERGYc BALANCES⇢ AND TEMPERATURES⇤ S# L" F F div F 111 s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O 90°N ANN -25 45°N 50 50 0 Latitude 75 25 45°S 25 200 90°S 120°E 120°W −25 25 90°N 150 DJF 125 45°N 100 100 50 −2 0 W m Latitude 125 200 50 45°S 0 90°S 0 120°E 120°W −25 25 90°N JJA −50 45°N 50 100 100 25 0 50 Latitude 45°S -50 90°S 120°E 120°W −25 25 Longitude W m−2 F 7.4: Surface sensible heat fluxes. where F ⇤ FA + FO 7.7 FORMS OF ENERGY 7.7.1 Atmosphere To atmosphere can be taken to be an ideal gas. I I ⇤ cvT (7.7) Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Surface latent heat fluxes 112 @Ts CHAPTER 7 c ⇢ ⇤ S# L" F F div F s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O 90°N ANN 45°N 175 200 150 0 175 Latitude 100 45°S 50 250 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 100 90°N 200 DJF 45°N 250 250 150 −2 0 100 150 125 W m Latitude 100 45°S 25 90°S 50 120°E 120°W 0 100 90°N JJA 0 45°N 75 125 100 0 200 150 Latitude 45°S 75 90°S 120°E 120°W 0 100 Longitude W m−2 F 7.5: Surface latent heat fluxes. P Φ ⇤ gz (7.8) L Lq (7.9) K 1 K ⇤ u 2 (7.10) 2 k k Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 Surface fluxes residual ENERGY BALANCES@ ANDTs TEMPERATURES 113 c ⇢ ⇤ S# L" F F div F s s @t 0 − 0 − L − S − O 90°N ANN 45°N −125 −175 0 150 Latitude 125 45°S 25 300 −25 250 90°S 120°E 120°W −100 100 200 90°N DJF 150 45°N −250 −225 100 −75 50 −2 0 175 0 W m Latitude 175 45°S 125 −50 −100 90°S 120°E 120°W −100 100 −150 90°N −200 JJA −250 45°N 175 200 75 0 Latitude −100 45°S −225 −125 90°S 120°E 120°W −100 100 Longitude W m−2 F 7.6: [Update with Liu et al. 2015 estimates] Surface energy uptake, cal- culated as a residual of the fluxes in Figs. 7.2–7.5.2 C Vertical integral p 1 1 s dp ⇢Idz⇤ ⇢c Tdz⇤ c T (7.11) v v g π0 π0 π0 Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 ENERGY BALANCES AND TEMPERATURES 109 Climate_Book October 24, 2016 6x9 110 CHAPTER 7 F 7.2: Absorbed solar radiative flux at the surface.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cryosphere: a Kingdom of Anomalies and Diversity
    Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6535–6542, 2018 https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6535-2018 © Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Cryosphere: a kingdom of anomalies and diversity Vladimir Melnikov1,2,3, Viktor Gennadinik1, Markku Kulmala1,4, Hanna K. Lappalainen1,4,5, Tuukka Petäjä1,4, and Sergej Zilitinkevich1,4,5,6,7,8 1Institute of Cryology, Tyumen State University, Tyumen, Russia 2Industrial University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia 3Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Center SB RAS, Tyumen, Russia 4Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research (INAR), Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 5Finnish Meteorological Institute, Helsinki, Finland 6Faculty of Radio-Physics, University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia 7Faculty of Geography, University of Moscow, Moscow, Russia 8Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Correspondence: Hanna K. Lappalainen (hanna.k.lappalainen@helsinki.fi) Received: 17 November 2017 – Discussion started: 12 January 2018 Revised: 20 March 2018 – Accepted: 26 March 2018 – Published: 8 May 2018 Abstract. The cryosphere of the Earth overlaps with the 1 Introduction atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere over vast areas ◦ with temperatures below 0 C and pronounced H2O phase changes. In spite of its strong variability in space and time, Nowadays the Earth system is facing the so-called “Grand the cryosphere plays the role of a global thermostat, keeping Challenges”. The rapidly growing population needs fresh air the thermal regime on the Earth within rather narrow limits, and water, more food and more energy. Thus humankind suf- affording continuation of the conditions needed for the main- fers from climate change, deterioration of the air, water and tenance of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of Sea Level Rise
    FACT SHEET Causes of Sea OUR COASTAL COMMUNITIES AT RISK Level Rise What the Science Tells Us HIGHLIGHTS From the rocky shoreline of Maine to the busy trading port of New Orleans, from Roughly a third of the nation’s population historic Golden Gate Park in San Francisco to the golden sands of Miami Beach, lives in coastal counties. Several million our coasts are an integral part of American life. Where the sea meets land sit some of our most densely populated cities, most popular tourist destinations, bountiful of those live at elevations that could be fisheries, unique natural landscapes, strategic military bases, financial centers, and flooded by rising seas this century, scientific beaches and boardwalks where memories are created. Yet many of these iconic projections show. These cities and towns— places face a growing risk from sea level rise. home to tourist destinations, fisheries, Global sea level is rising—and at an accelerating rate—largely in response to natural landscapes, military bases, financial global warming. The global average rise has been about eight inches since the centers, and beaches and boardwalks— Industrial Revolution. However, many U.S. cities have seen much higher increases in sea level (NOAA 2012a; NOAA 2012b). Portions of the East and Gulf coasts face a growing risk from sea level rise. have faced some of the world’s fastest rates of sea level rise (NOAA 2012b). These trends have contributed to loss of life, billions of dollars in damage to coastal The choices we make today are critical property and infrastructure, massive taxpayer funding for recovery and rebuild- to protecting coastal communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Warming Impacts on Severe Drought Characteristics in Asia Monsoon Region
    water Article Global Warming Impacts on Severe Drought Characteristics in Asia Monsoon Region Jeong-Bae Kim , Jae-Min So and Deg-Hyo Bae * Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, Sejong University, 209 Neungdong-ro, Gwangjin-Gu, Seoul 05006, Korea; [email protected] (J.-B.K.); [email protected] (J.-M.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-2-3408-3814 Received: 2 April 2020; Accepted: 7 May 2020; Published: 12 May 2020 Abstract: Climate change influences the changes in drought features. This study assesses the changes in severe drought characteristics over the Asian monsoon region responding to 1.5 and 2.0 ◦C of global average temperature increases above preindustrial levels. Based on the selected 5 global climate models, the drought characteristics are analyzed according to different regional climate zones using the standardized precipitation index. Under global warming, the severity and frequency of severe drought (i.e., SPI < 1.5) are modulated by the changes in seasonal and regional precipitation − features regardless of the region. Due to the different regional change trends, global warming is likely to aggravate (or alleviate) severe drought in warm (or dry/cold) climate zones. For seasonal analysis, the ranges of changes in drought severity (and frequency) are 11.5%~6.1% (and 57.1%~23.2%) − − under 1.5 and 2.0 ◦C of warming compared to reference condition. The significant decreases in drought frequency are indicated in all climate zones due to the increasing precipitation tendency. In general, drought features under global warming closely tend to be affected by the changes in the amount of precipitation as well as the changes in dry spell length.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Milankovitch: Consideration of Signal and Noise Stephen R
    [American Journal of Science, Vol. 308, June, 2008,P.770–786, DOI 10.2475/06.2008.02] RESOLVING MILANKOVITCH: CONSIDERATION OF SIGNAL AND NOISE STEPHEN R. MEYERS*,†, BRADLEY B. SAGEMAN**, and MARK PAGANI*** ABSTRACT. Milankovitch-climate theory provides a fundamental framework for the study of ancient climates. Although the identification and quantification of orbital rhythms are commonplace in paleoclimate research, criticisms have been advanced that dispute the importance of an astronomical climate driver. If these criticisms are valid, major revisions in our understanding of the climate system and past climates are required. Resolution of this issue is hindered by numerous factors that challenge accurate quantification of orbital cyclicity in paleoclimate archives. In this study, we delineate sources of noise that distort the primary orbital signal in proxy climate records, and utilize this template in tandem with advanced spectral methods to quantify Milankovitch-forced/paced climate variability in a temperature proxy record from the Vostok ice core (Vimeux and others, 2002). Our analysis indicates that Vostok temperature variance is almost equally apportioned between three components: the precession and obliquity periods (28%), a periodic “100,000” year cycle (41%), and the background continuum (31%). A range of analyses accounting for various frequency bands of interest, and potential bias introduced by the “saw-tooth” shape of the glacial/interglacial cycle, establish that precession and obliquity periods account for between 25 percent to 41 percent of the variance in the 1/10 kyr – 1/100 kyr band, and between 39 percent to 66 percent of the variance in the 1/10 kyr – 1/64 kyr band.
    [Show full text]
  • 126 Climate Change, Forests and Forest Management
    ISSN 0258-6150 J, Climate change,change, : forests andand 126 J, forest managementmanagement i An overviewoverview s/ss 38V OL 111111sm-- ." Food and - AgdoultureAgriculture Organization - of _ the ,_. UnitedUnfted Nations , 11i - o Climate change,change, forests andand forest managementmanagement An overviewoverview by William M.M. CieslaCiesla Forest Protection Officer FAO Forest ResourcesResources DivisionDivision j ...... -..----- .. ,- -_'T~ ___ _ j t:;, .:;-~. ~ .. "_, , -' . .,. ,. ~, . '---~_~_l 1 ,,-, -" '.', I on LaLa DigueDigue i~_~: be particularlyparticularly )1irnate;limate change, andmd intensity of The designations employedemployed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concemingconcerning thethe legallegal statusstatus ofof any any country, country, territory,territory, citycity oror area or ofof itsits authorities,authorities, oror concemingconcerning the delimitationdelimitation of its frontiers oror boundaries.boundaries. M-08 ISBN 92-5-103664-092-5-103664-0 All rights reserved.reserved. NoNo partpart ofof thisthis publicationpublication maymay bebe reproduced,reproduced, storedstored inin aa retrieval system, or transmittedtransmitted inin any formform oror byby any any means, means, electronic, electronic, mechanical,me.chanical, photocopying oror otherwise, without the prior permissionpermission of thethe copyright owner. Applications forfor such permission, withwith a statement
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change: Evidence & Causes 2020
    Climate Change Evidence & Causes Update 2020 An overview from the Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences n summary Foreword CLIMATE CHANGE IS ONE OF THE DEFINING ISSUES OF OUR TIME. It is now more certain than ever, based on many lines of evidence, that humans are changing Earth’s climate. The atmosphere and oceans have warmed, which has been accompanied by sea level rise, a strong decline in Arctic sea ice, and other climate-related changes. The impacts of climate change on people and nature are increasingly apparent. Unprecedented flooding, heat waves, and wildfires have cost billions in damages. Habitats are undergoing rapid shifts in response to changing temperatures and precipitation patterns. The Royal Society and the US National Academy of Sciences, with their similar missions to promote the use of science to benefit society and to inform critical policy debates, produced the original Climate Change: Evidence and Causes in 2014. It was written and reviewed by a UK-US team of leading climate scientists. This new edition, prepared by the same author team, has been updated with the most recent climate data and scientific analyses, all of which reinforce our understanding of human-caused climate change. The evidence is clear. However, due to the nature of science, not every detail is ever totally settled or certain. Nor has every pertinent question yet been answered. Scientific evidence continues to be gathered around the world. Some things have become clearer and new insights have emerged. For example, the period of slower warming during the 2000s and early 2010s has ended with a dramatic jump to warmer temperatures between 2014 and 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Changes in Drought Conditions Under Different Levels of Under Different Global Warming Levels
    Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Global Changes in Drought Conditions Under 10.1002/2017GL076521 Different Levels of Warming Key Points: G. Naumann1 ,L.Alfieri1 , K. Wyser2 , L. Mentaschi1, R. A. Betts3,4 , H. Carrao1 , • This paper proposes a methodology 1 1 1 for assessing global changes in J. Spinoni , J. Vogt , and L. Feyen drought characteristics under 1 2 different warming levels, including Joint Research Centre, European Commission, Ispra, Italy, Rossby Centre, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological 3 4 an assessment of the related Institute, Norrköping, Sweden, Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, uncertainties University of Exeter, Exeter, UK • Drought magnitude will halve in 20% of the global land surface with warming of 1.5°C and higher levels • A progressive and significant increase Abstract Higher evaporative demands and more frequent and persistent dry spells associated with rising in frequency of droughts is projected temperatures suggest that drought conditions could worsen in many regions of the world. In this study, we with warming in the Mediterranean assess how drought conditions may develop across the globe for 1.5, 2, and 3°C warming compared to basin, most of Africa, West and Southern Asia, Central America, and preindustrial temperatures. Results show that two thirds of global population will experience a progressive Oceania, where droughts are increase in drought conditions with warming. For drying areas, drought durations are projected to rise at projected to happen 5 to 10 times rapidly increasing rates with warming, averaged globally from 2.0 month/°C below 1.5°C to 4.2 month/°C more frequent even under ambitious mitigation targets when approaching 3°C.
    [Show full text]
  • Earth's Global Energy Budget
    EARTH'S GLOBAL ENERGY BUDGET BY KEVIN E. TRENBERTH, JOHN T. FASULLO, AND JEFFREY KIEHL An update of the Earth's global annual mean energy budget is given in the light of new observations and analyses. Changes overtime and contributions from the land and ocean domains are also detailed. eather and climate on Earth are determined in various forms, and converted among the differ- by the amount and distribution of incoming ent types, giving rise to a rich variety of weather or radiation from the sun. For an equilibrium turbulent phenomena in the atmosphere and ocean. W 1 climate, OLR necessarily balances the incoming Moreover, the energy balance can be upset in various ASR, although there is a great deal of fascinating ways, changing the climate and associated weather. atmosphere, ocean, and land phenomena that couple Kiehl and Trenberth (1997, hereafter KT97) the two. Incoming radiant energy may be scattered reviewed past estimates of the global mean flow of and reflected by clouds and aerosols or absorbed in energy through the climate system and presented the atmosphere. The transmitted radiation is then a new global mean energy budget based on various either absorbed or reflected at the Earth's surface. measurements and models. They also performed a Radiant solar or shortwave energy is transformed number of radiative computations to examine the into sensible heat, latent energy (involving different spectral features of the incoming and outgoing radia- water states), potential energy, and kinetic energy tion and determined the role of clouds and various before being emitted as longwave radiant energy. greenhouse gases in the overall radiative energy flows.
    [Show full text]
  • 5. the Climate System 5.1. Weather, Climate, and Components of the Climate System 5.2. the Atmosphere
    5. The climate system 5.1. Weather, climate, and components of the climate system The weather is characterized by the atmospheric conditions (e.g. temperature, precipitations, cloud cover, wind speed) at a particular place at a particular time. It applies to short-term changes in these conditions (less than a day to a few weeks). Climate is the average atmospheric conditions of a region and applies to longer-term changes (years and longer). Climate can also apply to larger spatial scales like continents or oceans. One can even refer to the climate of a particular planet (i.e. average atmospheric conditions characterizing this planet). Factors influencing the climate include for example the latitude, the presence or absence of mountains, and the distance from the sea (continentality). The climate system consists of five interacting natural components (Fig. 53, see also section 1) and is powered by solar energy. These natural components are the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, the cryosphere, the lithosphere, and the biosphere. To these natural components, a sixth component can be added: the anthroposphere (sum of all factors related to human activities). The 2007 report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) stated: “there is very high confidence that the global average net effect of human activities since 1750 has been one of warming” and “most of the observed increase in global average temperature since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations”. Figure 53: Schematic representation of Earth’s climate system and its components: the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, the cryosphere, the lithosphere, the biosphere, and the anthroposphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Climate a Guide for Teaching Climate Change in Grades 3 to 8 the Climate System 1 and Greenhouse Effect by Lindsey Mohan and Jenny D
    ENVIRONMENTAL LITERACY TEACHER GUIDE SERIES Changing Climate A Guide for Teaching Climate Change in Grades 3 to 8 The Climate System 1 and Greenhouse Effect by Lindsey Mohan and Jenny D Ingber “Climate is what you increased risk of drought, wildfires, and of this natural phenomenon is now expect, weather is plant and animal extinctions. causing a range of changes throughout In order to make well-informed Earth’s system. what you get.” decisions that will enable humans and In this chapter we consider the Robert A. Heinlein other organisms to continue to thrive on differences between climate and Earth into the future, today’s students weather, look at the climate system in arth’s global climate is changing, need to have at least a basic scientific more detail, discuss what it means for bringing numerous changes to the understanding of our planet’s climate climate to change, and take a closer E planet and the organisms that live system and the role that humans are look at the Greenhouse Effect and what on it. Validated records from instruments playing in changing it. students know about this important around the world show that our global The climate system encompasses a phenomenon. temperature increased by around one complex set of processes that affect degree Celsius (almost two degrees conditions around the world. One of Our Experience Fahrenheit) during the second half of the most important features of the of Climate the 20th century. Consequences of this climate system—the Greenhouse Weather and climate are a part of observed warming include substantial Effect—is necessary for life on Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Rainfall and Drought
    EXTREME RAINFALL AND DROUGHT Climate change poses many risks to human health. Some health impacts of climate change are already being felt in the United States. We need to safeguard our communities by protecting people’s health, wellbeing, and quality of life from climate change impacts. Many communities are already taking steps to address these public health issues and reduce the risk of harm. BACKGROUND When we burn fossil fuels, such as coal and gas, we release carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 builds up in the atmosphere and causes Earth’s temperature to rise, much like a blanket traps in heat. This extra trapped heat disrupts many of the interconnected systems in our environment. Increases in precipitation extremes, either heavy rainfall events or droughts, can impact our health. Warmer temperatures cause more water to evaporate into the air and allow that air to hold more water. This sets the stage for heavier downpours. At the same time, global temperatures influence the way heat and moisture move around the planet, meaning drier conditions will occur in some regions of the world. THE CLIMATE-HEALTH CONNECTION Precipitation extremes create many safety hazards and health risks. Over the last several decades, we have already seen an increase in the number of heavy precipitation events in the U.S. These events have contributed to more severe flooding in certain regions. Floods are one of the deadliest weather-related hazards in the U.S. – second only to heat. Other hazards can appear after a storm has passed. For example, a damp or flooded building can develop mold.
    [Show full text]
  • The Carbon Cycle and Climate Change/J Bret Bennington – First Edition ISBN 1 3: 978-0-495-73855-8;;, ISBN 1 0: 0-495-73855-7
    38557_00_cover.qxd 12/24/08 4:36 PM Page 1 The collection of chemical pathways by which carbon moves between Earth systems is called the carbon cycle and it is the flow of carbon through this cycle that ties together the functioning of the Earth’s atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere, and oceans to regulate the climate of our planet. This means that as drivers of planet Earth, anything we do to change the function or state of one Earth system will change the function and state of all Earth systems. If we change the composition of the atmosphere, we will also cause changes to propagate through the biosphere, hydrosphere, and geosphere, altering our planet in ways that will likely not be beneficial to human welfare. Understanding the functioning of the carbon cycle in detail so that we can predict the effects of human activities on the Earth and its climate is one of the most important scientific challenges of the 21st century. Package this module with any Cengage Learning text where learning about the car- bon cycle and humanity’s impact on the environment is important. About the Author Dr. J Bret Bennington grew up on Long Island and studied geology as an under- graduate at the University of Rochester in upstate New York. He earned his doctorate in Paleontology from the Department of Geological Sciences at Virginia Tech in 1995 and has been on the faculty of the Department of Geology at Hofstra University since 1993. Dr. Bennington’s research is focused on quantifying stability and change in marine benthic paleocommunities in the fossil record and on integrating paleontological and sedimentological data to understand the development of depositional sequences in both Carboniferous and Cretaceous marine environments.
    [Show full text]