DOCSLIB.ORG

Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation L e g e n d Cross Island Greenway Proposed path Proposed reconstructed path Segment Thirteen: Proposed on-street route Roadway Crossing Joe Michael's Mile / Marina - Utopia Parkway Site Enlargement A a Cross Section At the terminus of Joe Michael's Mile, the route will Connection with travel north on the east side of Totten Avenue along a NYC Bicycle Network 13 C r o s new 8' asphalt path to replace an existing 5' concrete s ASTORIA I s l sidewalk. To the north, a connection will be made RAVENSWOOD a n d P a with Fort Totten, an historic and scenic route r kw ay SUNNYSIDE destination. The site, a decommissioned army base, L i t t l e B a y BLISSVILLE Hi l l s i de y a w k MASPETH a r nt P Ce r al nd Gr a is scheduled to be reused as a Fire Training Bridge Neck Throgs Shore Rd Academy for the NYC Fire Department. Abbot Rd Approximately 50 acres of public parkland will be y a w k r a designated, including development of a multi-use P Conduit Blvd n o t New 12' asphalt l e r u path along the water's edge. Conveyance of the land multi-use path and 8' S out her n Par kway a L hexblock walkway. to the City will take approximately 2-3 years; Utopia Parkway Murray Av however, an interim public access plan will be v A y r developed by DPR. o t S a Greenway users also have the option of travelling Totten Av west along the new waterfront path at Little Bay Park. The design of the path would continue the W Little Bay Park "dual carriageway" design from Joe Michael's Mile; Fort Totten a a high demand is expected along this path as it will offer spectacular waterfront views, access to the Connection A with Park's recreational facilities (including a new roller NYC Bicycle hockey rink) and connections to the residential Network t communities to the west. Working with existing S 14th Av h C t r conditions, the path would travel along the southern St 209th 2 o 1 s 217th St s 2 h A I 5t v s and western border of the parking lot located at the 1 l a n d entrance to Fort Totten, and continue west along the P B A Y a r k waterfront. The path could be aligned along the TERRACE w a waterfront in this section, pending an analysis of the y parking facilities. West of the parking lot and along the remainder of the Park's waterfront, an 17th Av approximate ten foot grassy buffer will be preserved Clearview Golf Course between the pathway and the rip rap along the waterfront. Finally, the route will connect with the community of Beechurst, and the proposed citywide bicycle network, at the existing Park exit at Utopia Parkway. 23rd Av Water Edge Dr 23rd Rd N MATCH LINE "K" Page 38 Schematic Design . Cross Island Greenway . Segment Thirteen Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation New 8' hexagonal block walkway; 12' asphalt path Fort Totten New Crosswalk Pedestrian Walkway New 8' asphalt path to replace 5' concrete sidewalk Little Bay Park Trail head 15' asphalt path New Ft Totten Rd Cross Island Parkway bollards N A Fort Totten / Little Bay Park A 1' 6' 6' 1' 8' 1' a-a Little Bay Park, looking west. Proposed 12' asphalt mixed-use path and 8' hexblock walkway Little Bay Park, looking west towards Fort Totten to replace existing informal dirt path. Schematic Design . Cross Island Greenway . Segment Thirteen Page 39 Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation On-street Bicycle Route Design On-street Signs and Pavement Markings The design of the on-stret portions of the proposed Below are the on-street regulatory, warning and Greenway is consistent with the design of existing on- guidance signs and pavement marking for on-street street bicycle routes throughout New York City. bicycle facilities as used by NYC DOT. As specified by state statute, the signs and markings are consistent with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). These signs are coupled with Greenway medallions for route continuity. Bicycle Lane Bicycle Path Bicycle lanes are part of the roadway and delineated by pavement markings and regulatory signage. The lane is ususally next to the curb parking lane, but may also be next to a curb where standing is prohibited. Guidance signs Regulatory signs Consistent with AASHTO guidelines, minimum bicycle lane width is 5 feet. Bicycle Route Warning signs Bicycle routes are identified by informational signing only. Bicycle routes on arterial roadways often have Lane and symbol marking wider curb lanes. Design Guidelines . On-street Bicycle Route Page 40 DesignGreenway Guidelines: Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Off-street Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island Paths City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation Off-street Bicycle/Pedestrian Route Design: Multi-Use Path Pedestrian Walkway Dimensions: 12 feet wide with one inch timber edge Dimensions: 8 feet wide with one foot wide curbs. A total trail width of 10 feet. Asphalt paths, ranging in width from 8' to 12', on either side. A total trail width of represent the majority of the off-street portions of the 12 feet, 2 inches. proposed greenways. In certain areas (along North Materials: Asphaltic hex pavers with blue stone curbing. Conduit between 80th and 88th Streets and in front Materials: Hot rolled asphalt travel way with crushed of Aqueduct Race Track), 8' asphalt paths replace 5' stoned clear zone concrete sidewalks. Signage is required along these 1" 1" 1' 8' 1' segments instructing cyclists to "go slow - respect 12' others". The paving of the path in asphalt will also alert pedestrians that this is not a "typical" sidewalk. Where dual carriageways are specified (Joe Michael's Mile, Little Bay Park and Conduit right-of- way), a hexagonal block walkway is located parallel to the asphalt path. The Parkways have a strong history of unique and varied plantings. This should be continued for the development of the Greenway, especially in areas where additional planting is possible. Planting will provide route continuity, interest and buffer Greenway travellers from automotive disturbance. Street tree planting plans should be developed for the Asphalt Hex Pavers on-street sections in cooperation with the Hot Rolled Asphalt community. Plan Hand tight 1 1/2" Binder Course Sand-swept joints 4" Asphalt 3 1/2" Bases Hex Pavers 2" Sand 12" Crushed 6" Crushed Stone Stone Compacted Subgrade Compacted Subgrade Concrete Page 41 Design Guidelines . Off-street Multi-use Path Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation Bridge Structure and Barrier Rails Vehicle Access Controls The Master Plan proposes a bicycle/pedestrian A physical barrier is needed at roadway intersections and bridge over an on-ramp on the Southern Parkway. entrances to the multi-use paths to prevent unauthorized Shown below is a detail for a multi-use bridge and motor vehicles from entering. A barrier is also warranted bridge railing, consistent with AASHTO standards. when the path is located near sensitive natural habitats, such The Master Plan also recommends use of the bridge as the proposed path in Idlewild Park. DPR has developed railing on paths adjacent to roadways to protect several guard rail and bollard details for various locations greenway users. throughout the city. Shown below are two examples. Detail for a collapsible steel bollard Source: Reconstruction of the Shore Parkway bicycle path, DPR Steel barrier rail along perimeter of Marine Park Details for multi-use bridge. Source: North Carolina DOT Design Guidelines . Off-street Multi-use Path Page 42 Greenway Master Plan: Conduit . Southern Queens . Laurelton . Cross Island City of New York/Department of City Planning . City of New York/Parks & Recreation Greenway Signage Path Pavement Markings DCP has proposed signage for the City's Greenway greenway's name. Shown below are five examples Shown below are the proposed path pavement System in an effort to provide recognizable identity of signs which could be used along the off-street markings for DPR's construction of the Cherry for a greenway while guiding users safely along the segments of the Conduit, Southern Queens, Walk section of the Hudson River Valley Greenway. route. The signage uses a green color and vertical Laurelton and Cross Island Greenways. The paths in the Conduit, Southern Queens, lozenge shape for easy recognition and installation Laurelton and Cross Island Greenways should on narrow paths, and a distinctive logo with the follow this example, with clear markings of a bicycle, in-line skater and a directional arrow. REEN REENW G W GREENWA A CG Y C Y Y A Y C Y NY N N C R C O D CO R SS N NDUIT OS ISLA D S ISLAN SLOW REENW REENW REENW G A G G C A A Y Y C Y C Y Y Y N N N S O C U S R L T N OS D A HE EE S ISLAN URELTON RN QU Respect Pedestrian Others Crossing Ahead GO SLOW Page 43 Design Guidelines .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Roundabouts Applying the 'System'
    Roundabouts Applying the 'System' to Roundabouts Let us suppose that you are on a dual carriageway approaching a roundabout (400m away). You are currently in the left lane and you intend to turn right at the roundabout. Information: - Take - You see the roundabout and its triangular warning signs in the distance. There are no vehicles between you and the roundabout but you see vehicles on the roundabout. Mirror check. There are two vehicles behind, both in the left lane. - Use - You know that you have to change to the right lane and that you will need to signal to change lane and then to signal continuously on the approach and through the roundabout (the standard Highway Code procedure for turning right at a roundabout)- Give - After checking your mirrors you signal right to the vehicles behind. Position: The right signal remains on for a few seconds and then gradually you move to the right hand lane (Information-Use/Give). When the manoeuver is complete you cancel the signal. After a few more seconds the right signal is re-applied to confirm to the drivers behind that you intend to turn right at the roundabout. Information: The speed and position of the vehicles behind are monitored as you approach the roundabout. An assessment is made of the movement of vehicles on the roundabout and those approaching it from the right and left. You look over the roundabout to see, if possible, vehicles approaching it from the opposite direction (Information-Take). Speed: As you approach the roundabout you begin to brake and lose speed smoothly and progressively (Information-Give).
    [Show full text]
  • TA 79/99 Amendment No 1 3
    Chapter 3 Volume 5 Section 1 Determination of Urban Road Capacity Part 3 TA 79/99 Amendment No 1 3. DETERMINATION OF URBAN ROAD CAPACITY 3.1 Table 1 sets out the types of Urban Roads and the features that distinguish between them and affect their traffic capacity. Tables 2 & 3 give the flow capacity for each road type described in Table 1. 3.2 Table 4 gives the adjustments when the proportion of heavy vehicles in a one way flow exceeds 15%. A heavy vehicle is defined in this context as OGV1, OGV2 or Buses and Coaches as given in the COBA Manual (DMRB 13.1 Part 4, Chapter 8). 3.3 The flows for road type UM in Table 2 apply to urban motorways where junctions are closely spaced giving weaving lengths of less than 1 kilometre. Urban motorways with layout and junction spacing similar to rural motorways can carry higher flows and TA46/97 “Traffic Flow Ranges for Use in the Assessment of New Rural Roads” will be more applicable. 3.4 Flows for single carriageways are based upon a 60/40 directional split in the flow. The one-way flows shown in Table 2 represent the busiest flow 60% figure. 3.5 The capacities shown apply to gradients of up to 5-6%. Special consideration should be made for steeper gradients, which would reduce capacity. 3.6 On-road parking reduces the effective road width and disrupts flow, e.g. where parking restrictions are not applied on road type UAP2 the flows are likely to be similar to UAP3 where unrestricted parking applies, see Table 1, Similarly effective parking restrictions can lead to higher flows.
    [Show full text]
  • Dual Carriageways Dual Carriageways – Know the Dangers
    ROAD SAFETY EDUCATION Dual Carriageways Dual carriageways – know the dangers Never confuse a dual carriageway with a motorway. Both may have 2 or 3 lanes, a central reservation and a national speed limit of 70 mph, but that’s as far as the similarity goes. When driving on a dual carriageway there are many dangers you need to be aware of. Know the difference between dual carriageways and motorways Unlike motorways… • Dual carriageways may have variable speed limits; • Dual carriageways usually permit right turns; • Dual carriageways allow traffic to join from the left and cross from left to right; • Cyclists, mopeds, farm vehicles and pedestrians are allowed to use dual carriageways; • Dual carriageways may have Pelican Crossings, traffic lights, roundabouts and Zebra Crossings. 2 Know the speed limits Dual carriageways often have lower or variable speed limits shown by red circular signs. Rule 124 of The Highway Code NI says you MUST NOT exceed the maximum speed limits for the road and for your vehicle. The presence of street lights generally means that there is a 30 mph (48 km/h) speed limit unless otherwise specified. 3 Know your stopping distances (Rule 126) Always drive at a speed that will allow you to stop well within the distance you can see to be clear. Leave enough space between you and the vehicle in front so that you can pull up safely if it suddenly slows down or stops. Remember - • Never get closer than the overall stopping distance (see typical stopping distances table); • Always allow at least a two-second gap between you and the vehicle Know how to join a in front on roads carrying dual carriageway fast-moving traffic and in tunnels where visibility is reduced; When joining a dual carriageway • The two-second gap rule should obey signs and road markings.
    [Show full text]
  • Speed Limits) Bill
    Research and Information Service Bill Paper 27th February 2014 Des McKibbin Road Traffic (Speed Limits) Bill NIAR 928-13 This paper examines the provisions of the Road Traffic (Speed Limits) Bill Paper 19/15 27th February 2014 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 928-13 Bill Paper Key Points The principal objective of the Road Traffic (Speed Limits) Bill (the Bill) is to reduce the number of accidents and fatalities caused by road traffic collisions, by introducing a 20mph speed limit for residential roads. The Bill provides DRD/Roads Service with the flexibility to make orders specifying that certain roads are, or are not, ‘residential roads’. In so doing, the Department has to consider whether or not the road is in a predominantly residential area or is a major thoroughfare. In order to apply this exemption it is anticipated that DRD/Roads Service would have to assess the entire urban unclassified road network (4,291km) to establish the most appropriate speed limit i.e. should the new national 20mph speed limit be applied or are the conditions right for a 30mph limit to be retained. A period of two years following royal assent has been prescribed for the DRD to carry out a public awareness campaign to ensure the public are made aware of the implications of this legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • SETTING LOCAL SPEED LIMITS Draft: July 2012
    SETTING LOCAL SPEED LIMITS Draft: July 2012 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Background and objectives of the Circular 3. The underlying principles of local speed limits 4. The legislative framework 5. The Speed Limit Appraisal Tool 6. Urban speed management 6.1. 20 mph speed limits and zones 6.2. Traffic calming measures 6.3. 40 and 50 mph speed limits 7. Rural speed management 7.1. Dual carriageway rural roads 7.2. Single carriageway rural roads 7.3. Villages 8. References/Bibliography Appendix A Key pieces of speed limit, signing and related legislation and regulations SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION Key points Speed limits should be evidence-led and self-explaining and seek to reinforce people's assessment of what is a safe speed to travel. They should encourage self-compliance. Speed limits should be seen by drivers as the maximum rather than a target speed. Traffic authorities set local speed limits in situations where local needs and conditions suggest a speed limit which is lower than the national speed limit. This guidance is to be used for setting all local speed limits on single and dual carriageway roads in both urban and rural areas. This guidance should also be used as the basis for assessments of local speed limits, for developing route management strategies and for developing the speed management strategies which can be included in Local Transport Plans. 1. The Department for Transport has a vision for a transport system that is an engine for economic growth, but one that is also more sustainable, safer, and improves quality of life in our communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Guerrilla Gardening: an Exploration of Illegal Cultivation in the UK
    Centre for Environment and Society Research Working Paper series no. 1 Understanding guerrilla gardening: an exploration of illegal cultivation in the UK Michael Hardman Understanding guerrilla gardening: an exploration of illegal cultivation in the UK Michael Hardman School of Property, Construction and Planning, Birmingham City University Working Paper Series, no. 1 2011 ISBN 978-1-904839-44-6 © Author, 2011 Published by Birmingham City University Centre for Environment and Society Research Faculty of Technology, Engineering and the Environment City Centre campus, Millennium Point, Curzon Street, Birmingham, B4 7XG, UK ii CONTENTS Contents ii List of illustrations ii Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii The development of guerrilla gardening 1 The purpose of guerrilla gardening 3 Case study: F Troop 6 The ethical implications of researching a guerrilla troop 7 F Troop digs 7 Guerrilla gardening as a movement 10 Understanding a ‘movement’ 10 The four stages 11 Acting collectively 12 Conclusion 15 References 16 List of illustrations Figure 1: Seed bombs moulded to look like hand grenades 2 Figure 2: A suburban guerrilla food-producing alleyway 4 Figure 3: A large skirt which hid the planting of saplings into the M41 5 Figure 4: Hardman’s spectrum of guerrilla groups 6 Figure 5: The location of many of F Troop’s digs 8 Figure 6: F Troop in action 9 Figure 7: The food alley, and F Troop’s Nasturtium arrangement 11 Figure 8: The four stages theory applied to guerrilla gardening troops 13 Abstract This paper explores the concept of guerrilla gardening. It begins with a history of unlawful growing before investigating why individuals take part in guerrilla gardening.
    [Show full text]
  • The UK Standards for Roundabouts and Mini Roundabouts
    THE UK STANDARDS FOR ROUNDABOUTS AND MINI-ROUNDABOUTS Janet V Kennedy Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) Crowthorne House Nine Mile Ride Wokingham Berkshire RG40 3GA United Kingdom Tel +44 (0) 1344 770953 Email [email protected] ABSTRACT The modern priority rule for roundabouts was first introduced in the UK during the 1960s and has been in widespread use ever since, gradually being adopted around the world. Roundabouts are recognised as a safe and efficient form of junction, particularly where side road flows are high. Extensive research led to predictive models for both safety and capacity and modern design is based on these relationships. The idea of mini-roundabouts was conceived during the 1970s. They are used in the UK in urban areas where a roundabout would be the first choice of junction if space permitted. They usually replace existing priority junctions. Like conventional roundabouts, they are seen as a safe and efficient form of junction. Both capacity and accident predictive relationships have been developed specifically for mini-roundabouts. The new standards for the geometric design of roundabouts and mini-roundabouts were published in 2007. Details of both standards are given in the paper. BACKGROUND The modern priority rule for roundabouts was first introduced in the UK during the 1960s and has been in widespread use ever since, gradually being adopted around the world. Roundabouts are recognised as a safe and efficient form of junction, particularly where side road flows are high. Extensive research led to predictive models for both safety and capacity and modern design is based on these relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS
    Rural Road Link Design DN-GEO-03031 June 2017 TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE IRELAND (TII) PUBLICATIONS About TII Transport Infrastructure Ireland (TII) is responsible for managing and improving the country’s national road and light rail networks. About TII Publications TII maintains an online suite of technical publications, which is managed through the TII Publications website. The contents of TII Publications is clearly split into ‘Standards’ and ‘Technical’ documentation. All documentation for implementation on TII schemes is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Standards), and all other documentation within the system is collectively referred to as TII Publications (Technical). Document Attributes Each document within TII Publications has a range of attributes associated with it, which allows for efficient access and retrieval of the document from the website. These attributes are also contained on the inside cover of each current document, for reference. TII Publication Title Rural Road Link Design TII Publication Number DN-GEO-03031 Activity Design (DN) Document Set Standards Stream Geometry (GEO) Publication Date June 2017 Document 03031 Historical NRA TD 9 Number Reference TII Publications Website This document is part of the TII publications system all of which is available free of charge at http://www.tiipublications.ie. For more information on the TII Publications system or to access further TII Publications documentation, please refer to the TII Publications website. TII Authorisation and Contact Details This document
    [Show full text]
  • Measures of Functional Reliability of Two-Lane Highways
    energies Article Measures of Functional Reliability of Two-Lane Highways Krzysztof Ostrowski 1,* and Marcin Budzynski 2 1 The Faculty of Civil Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Warszawska 24 Street, 31-155 Cracow, Poland 2 The Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Gdansk University of Technology, Narutowicza 11 Street, 80-233 Gdansk, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-604551175 Abstract: Rural two-lane highways are the most common road type both in Poland and globally. In terms of kilometres, their length is by far greater than that of motorways and expressways. They are roads of one carriageway for each direction, which makes the overtaking of slower vehicles possible only when there is a gap in the stream of traffic moving from the opposite direction. Motorways and express roads are dual carriageways that are expected to support high speed travel mainly over long distances. Express roads have somewhat lower technical parameters and a lower speed limit than motorways. Two-lane highways are used for both short- and long-distance travel. The paper presents selected studies conducted in Poland in 2016–2018 on rural two-lane highways and focuses on the context of the need for their reliability. The research was carried out on selected short and longer road sections located in various surroundings, grouped in terms of curvature change rate CCR, longitudinal slopes and cross-sections (width of lanes and shoulders). The studies of traffic volumes, travel time and travel speed, as well as traffic density, will be used to analyze traffic performance and identify measures of travel time reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • Solid Or Planted Central Median
    The creation of a central median barrier is preferred for high volume/ high speed roads and where turning/u-turns are not permitted or desirable. Solid and flush medians can be used in combination with each other. Planting can add amenity, lower traffic speeds and can also be used to discourage or prevent informal pedestrian crossing movements. However, due to maintenance requirements, planting cannot be installed on medians on collector or arterial roads. 1 5 2 Minimum lane widths: refer to 1 4 lane selection elements. Central median width minimum 1.0m to typically up to 3.3m. Minimum for planted median 3 2 is 2.5m. For carriageway width requirements for maintenance of planted medians see D137. If pedestrian crossing is supported, refuge areas are required every 3 120m. Design requirements are provided in the IDC Standard Drawings T423 and T440. Planting of shrubs and placement of light poles within the median are possible subject to space requirements and safety for maintenance. 4 Refer to "Soft landscape elements" in the Street design tool for preferred options and limitations for planted central medians. If streetlights are to be installed in medium strips and trees then root guard will be required. Select a tall and narrow tree for the median. For further information 5 please see TCC’s Planting Guide. Tree root space parameters also apply (>2.0m median width is likely to be required). Driving elements Infrastructure Development Code D108 Street Design Diagrams Solid or planted central median June 2021 Version 1 This element requires vehicle crossings to be restricted on high volume streets or freight routes and managed in a way that maintains safety and efficiency for all modes.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeway Geometric Design for Active Traffic Management in Europe
    International Technology Scanning Program Freeway Geometric Design for Active Traffic Management in Europe Sponsored by: In cooperation with: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials National Cooperative Highway Research Program MARCH 2011 NOTICE The Federal Highway Administration provides high-quality information to serve Government, industry, and the public in a manner that promotes public understanding. Standards and policies are used to ensure and maximize the quality, objectivity, utility, and integrity of its information. FHWA periodically reviews quality issues and adjusts its programs and processes to ensure continuous quality improvement. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-PL-11-004 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Freeway Geometric Design for Active Traffic March 2011 Management in Europe 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Jeffrey C. Jones, Martin C. Knopp, Kay Fitzpatrick, Mark A. Doctor, Charles E. Howard, Gregory M. Laragan, James A. Rosenow, Brooke A. Struve, Barton A. Thrasher, and Elizabeth G. Young 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) American Trade Initiatives 11. Contract or Grant No. P.O. Box 8228 Alexandria, VA 22306-8228 DTFH61-99-C-005 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of International Programs Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code U.S. Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials 15. Supplementary Notes FHWA COTR: Hana Maier, Office of International Programs 16. Abstract Continued growth in travel on congested urban freeway corridors exceeds the ability of agencies to provide sufficient solutions and alternatives based on traditional roadway expansion and improvement projects.
    [Show full text]
  • High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes
    TRAFFIC ADVISORY LEAFLET 3/06 High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes December 2006 INTRODUCTION HOV lanes, like all traffic engineering measures, are not The concept of using designated lanes for buses is well the automatic solution to any particular type of problem. understood and widely used by highway authorities in urban Scheme designers should therefore consider a HOV lane areas where bus services are adversely affected by traffic as one of a range of measures that might be used. The congestion. Details of commonly used measures can be found benefits and disbenefits to all traffic should be assessed as 1 in Local Transport Note (LTN) 1/971 and the Department's for any other designated lane, see LTN 1/97 . 2 Resource Pack "Bus Priority - The Way Ahead" . It could well be that the best solution for a particular High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes are a method of problem is, say, selective detection of buses at traffic signals, or granting buses exemption from prohibited utilising spare capacity in existing bus lanes. They can also turning movements. Alternatively, it might be appropriate be used where the introduction of new bus lanes cannot be to use traffic engineering measures of this, or another, type justified on bus frequency grounds, or as part of a policy to in addition to a HOV lane, to ensure that it operates in a encourage car sharing. satisfactory manner. The basic principle is that only vehicles carrying two or A HOV lane can also be co-ordinated with the more people, buses and two wheeled vehicles are introduction of a staff car-sharing scheme involving local permitted to use the lanes during the hours of operation.
    [Show full text]