DOCSLIB.ORG

Insight: Contemplating the Cross of Christ in a Time of Healing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Insight: Contemplating the Cross of Christ in a Time of Healing Insight: Contemplating the Cross of Christ in a time of healing September 12, 2018 WASHINGTON, D.C. – As a new school year begins we say ‘thank you’ to catechetical leaders and catechists who begin their ministry of faith formation, education, and witness to faith. As catechists renew their commitment to leading others to Jesus Christ, the one who stands at the heart of all catechetical efforts, they will hear the anguished voices of the faithful in these challenging times. One image of Jesus’ crucifixion offers a profound visual catechesis for catechists and those they serve who seek hope, wisdom, and perseverance in faith in a season of healing. An image for times of pain and scandal The Small Crucifixion was painted by Matthias Grünewald, the master German painter, in the early years of the 16th century, a time marked by widespread scandal and deep divisions in the Church, sadly not unlike our own today. Only two dozen works of the artist survive, among them The Small Crucifixion, from the permanent collection at the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C. The painter’s best known masterpiece is the Isenheim Altarpiece, commissioned for the high altar of the church of the Monastery of Saint Anthony in Alsace, where patients suffering from the plague and various skin diseases were treated. In that large altarpiece, Grünewald depicts a crucified Christ whose body is racked with plague type scars. Patients bearing the pain of their physical afflictions found spiritual comfort as they gazed on the crucified Jesus and identified with the mystery of his unjust suffering. It is thought that The Small Crucifixion was a personal devotional image, intended either for a domestic setting or a private chapel. The bruised and broken Body of Christ While Grünewald’s image depicts the historical event of Jesus’ crucifixion, it is more than a visual record of a distant, past event. The Church is the Body of Christ and in Jesus’ suffering body on the cross we see an image of His Body, the Church, suffering and broken, silenced in anguished waiting for God’s healing and transformative power. So Grünewald’s image of Jesus’ suffering is an image of the Church in her suffering, in every age, and in our own painful times. He was wounded for our transgressions In The Small Crucifixion, the artist presents the vivid horror of Jesus’ suffering body. One sees the depths of Jesus’ abandonment, his deep despair, and the extreme physical pain of a crucifixion. His body bears scars of torture while his lean face and bowed head evoke the injustice of his torment. Under a piercing crown of thorns, our Lord’s sacred face bleeds. The depravity of his tormentors is evidenced by his tattered loincloth. Helpless, humiliated, and silenced in the face of betrayal, rejection, and injustice is the Lord’s body on the cross, and his Body that is the Church. But it is Jesus’ twisted hands and gnarled feet that convey the real depths of his agony. Obedient “even to death on a cross,” Jesus’ torment rises to heaven through gnarled fingers that cry out to the heavens. His twisted ankles, bending beneath the brutality of the nails that pierce his feet bear the chains of the world’s sinfulness. The crossbeam pulls downward under the mass of his body and the weight of divine mercy that takes the form of crucified love. A prayer for healing mercy Standing before the cross is Mary, the Blessed Mother of God, and St. John, the beloved disciple of the Lord. Mary’s head is bowed in anguished prayer, as she shares uniquely in her Son’s suffering. St. John bears the humiliation of a faithful disciple, like every faithful disciple who now looks on the Lord’s wounded body, his Church. And St. Mary Magdalene kneels at Jesus’ feet, faithful to the end. All three figures share in the Lord’s passion, as they witness his trial, condemnation, agony, and death on the cross. Their place at the foot of the cross is now ours as the faithful share in the unspeakable pain of survivors of abuse and beg God for their healing and for the renewal of the Church. As the canvas bends outward this sacred scene moves into our space. The stark realism of Grünewald’s depiction allows no room for mere spectators, just as the stark reality of current events in the Church does for the faithful. The force of God’s self-emptying love on the cross invites our participation in the mystery of Jesus’ suffering and the suffering of the Church. Only Christian faith gives access to this kind of participation. For with eyes of faith we see that Jesus’ crucified love is poured out on all humanity, but especially on those who suffer the most in his body, the Church. Grünewald’s vision allows us to see God’s healing mercy take the form of suffering love. Sometimes a catechist might hear the question – why did Jesus suffer? In these distressing times, a catechist will eventually be asked – why does Jesus’ body, the Church, suffer? The Catechism tells us that Jesus suffered out of the depths of God’s love for sinful humanity. Yes, Jesus’ passion was an unequaled suffering. But the Son of God offered himself on the cross for all our sins. No one, not even the saintliest person, can take on the sins of all or offer himself as a sacrifice for sinful humanity as a whole. Only God can and did on the cross. By your holy cross you have redeemed the world. At the Sign of Peace at every Eucharist, the priest prays these words, “Lord, look not on our sins, but on the faith of your Church.” From the cross, Jesus looked on the sins of humanity and willingly suffered for them. From the cross, Jesus looks now on the faith of the Church, nourished by many faithful, holy priests and catechists in parishes across this local Church. For their ministry of teaching, forming and strengthening the faith of children, youth, and adults we say ‘thank you’ with a prayer that their efforts advance the Church’s healing and renewal. For we know and believe in faith that the horror of Jesus’ crucifixion gives way to the radiant glory of His, and our, resurrection. Read more Articles by Dr. Jem Sullivan on the Catholic Standard website. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Download
    Journal of Arts & Humanities Volume 10, Issue 02, 2021: 28-50 Article Received: 02-02-2021 Accepted: 22-02-2021 Available Online: 28-02-2021 ISSN: 2167-9045 (Print), 2167-9053 (Online) DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/jah.v10i2.2053 The Enthroned Virgin and Child with Six Saints from Santo Stefano Castle, Apulia, Italy Dr. Patrice Foutakis1 ABSTRACT A seven-panel work entitled The Monopoli Altarpiece is displayed at the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston, Massachusetts. It is considered to be a Cretan-Venetian creation from the early fifteenth century. This article discusses the accounts of what has been written on this topic, and endeavors to bring field-changing evidence about its stylistic and iconographic aspects, the date, the artists who created it, the place it originally came from, and the person who had the idea of mounting an altarpiece. To do so, a comparative study on Byzantine and early-Renaissance painting is carried out, along with more attention paid to the history of Santo Stefano castle. As a result, it appears that the artist of the central panel comes from the Mystras painting school between 1360 and 1380, the author of the other six panels is Lorenzo Veneziano around 1360, and the altarpiece was not a single commission, but the mounting of panels coming from separate artworks. The officer Frà Domenico d’Alemagna, commander of Santo Stefano castle, had the idea of mounting different paintings into a seven-panel altarpiece between 1390 and 1410. The aim is to shed more light on a piece of art which stands as a witness from the twilight of the Middle Ages and the dawn of Renaissance; as a messenger from the Catholic and Orthodox pictorial traditions and collaboration; finally as a fosterer of the triple Byzantine, Gothic, Renaissance expression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth
    The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Fine Arts of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Adam R. Gustafson June 2011 © 2011 Adam R. Gustafson All Rights Reserved 2 This dissertation titled The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria by ADAM R. GUSTAFSON has been approved for the School of Interdisciplinary Arts and the College of Fine Arts _______________________________________________ Dora Wilson Professor of Music _______________________________________________ Charles A. McWeeny Dean, College of Fine Arts 3 ABSTRACT GUSTAFSON, ADAM R., Ph.D., June 2011, Interdisciplinary Arts The Artistic Patronage of Albrecht V and the Creation of Catholic Identity in Sixteenth- Century Bavaria Director of Dissertation: Dora Wilson Drawing from a number of artistic media, this dissertation is an interdisciplinary approach for understanding how artworks created under the patronage of Albrecht V were used to shape Catholic identity in Bavaria during the establishment of confessional boundaries in late sixteenth-century Europe. This study presents a methodological framework for understanding early modern patronage in which the arts are necessarily viewed as interconnected, and patronage is understood as a complex and often contradictory process that involved all elements of society. First, this study examines the legacy of arts patronage that Albrecht V inherited from his Wittelsbach predecessors and developed during his reign, from 1550-1579. Albrecht V‟s patronage is then divided into three areas: northern princely humanism, traditional religion and sociological propaganda.
    [Show full text]
  • Girolamo Muziano, Scipione Pulzone, and the First Generation of Jesuit Art
    journal of jesuit studies 6 (2019) 196-212 brill.com/jjs Girolamo Muziano, Scipione Pulzone, and the First Generation of Jesuit Art John Marciari The Morgan Library & Museum, New York [email protected] Abstract While Bernini and other artists of his generation would be responsible for much of the decoration at the Chiesa del Gesù and other Jesuit churches, there was more than half a century of art commissioned by the Jesuits before Bernini came to the attention of the order. Many of the early works painted in the 1580s and 90s are no longer in the church, and some do not even survive; even a major monument like Girolamo Muzia- no’s Circumcision, the original high altarpiece, is neglected in scholarship on Jesuit art. This paper turns to the early altarpieces painted for the Gesù by Muziano and Scipione Pulzone, to discuss the pictorial and intellectual concerns that seem to have guided the painters, and also to some extent to speculate on why their works are no longer at the Gesù, and why these artists are so unfamiliar today. Keywords Jesuit art – Il Gesù – Girolamo Muziano – Scipione Pulzone – Federico Zuccaro – Counter-Reformation – Gianlorenzo Bernini Visitors to the Chiesa del Gesù in Rome, or to the recent exhibition of Jesuit art at Fairfield University,1 might naturally be led to conclude that Gianlorenzo 1 Linda Wolk-Simon, ed., The Holy Name: Art of the Gesù; Bernini and His Age, Exh. cat., Fair- field University Art Museum, Early Modern Catholicism and the Visual Arts 17 (Philadelphia: Saint Joseph’s University Press, 2018).
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Van Dyck As a Religious Painter Thomas L
    Document generated on 09/28/2021 9:09 p.m. RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne Canadian Art Review Observations on van Dyck as a Religious Painter Thomas L. Glen Volume 10, Number 1, 1983 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1074637ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1074637ar See table of contents Publisher(s) UAAC-AAUC (University Art Association of Canada | Association d'art des universités du Canada) ISSN 0315-9906 (print) 1918-4778 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Glen, T. L. (1983). Observations on van Dyck as a Religious Painter. RACAR : Revue d'art canadienne / Canadian Art Review, 10(1), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.7202/1074637ar Tous droits réservés © UAAC-AAUC (University Art Association of Canada | This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit Association d'art des universités du Canada), 1983 (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ Observations on van Dyck as a Religions Painter* THOMAS L. GLEN McGill University When dealing with Europcan religious art of the for the main altar of the Church of St. Walburgis seventeenth century, one must inevitably contend (Fig. 2). In Rubens’ altarpiece we witness Christ with the awesome personality of Sir Peter Paul triumphant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mariology of St. Bonaventure As a Source of Inspiration in Italian Late Medieval Iconography
    José María SALVADOR GONZÁLEZ, La mariología de San Buenaventura como fuente de inspiración en la iconografía bajomedieval italiana The mariology of St. Bonaventure as a source of inspiration in Italian late medieval iconography La mariología de San Buenaventura como fuente de inspiración en la iconografía bajomedieval italiana1 José María SALVADOR-GONZÁLEZ Universidad Complutense de Madrid [email protected] Recibido: 05/09/2014 Aceptado: 05/10/2014 Abstract: The central hypothesis of this paper raises the possibility that the mariology of St. Bonaventure maybe could have exercised substantial, direct influence on several of the most significant Marian iconographic themes in Italian art of the Late Middle Ages. After a brief biographical sketch to highlight the prominent position of this saint as a master of Scholasticism, as a prestigious writer, the highest authority of the Franciscan Order and accredited Doctor of the Church, the author of this paper presents the thesis developed by St. Bonaventure in each one of his many “Mariological Discourses” before analyzing a set of pictorial images representing various Marian iconographic themes in which we could detect the probable influence of bonaventurian mariology. Key words: Marian iconography; medieval art; mariology; Italian Trecento painting; St. Bonaventure; theology. Resumen: La hipótesis de trabajo del presente artículo plantea la posibilidad de que la doctrina mariológica de San Buenaventura haya ejercido notable influencia directa en varios de los más significativos temas iconográficos
    [Show full text]
  • The Crucifixion C
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Italian Thirteenth and Fourteenth Century Paintings Paolo Veneziano Venetian, active 1333 - 1358 The Crucifixion c. 1340/1345 tempera on panel painted surface: 31 x 38 cm (12 3/16 x 14 15/16 in.) overall: 33.85 x 41.1 cm (13 5/16 x 16 3/16 in.) framed: 37.2 x 45.4 x 5.7 cm (14 5/8 x 17 7/8 x 2 1/4 in.) Inscription: upper center: I.N.R.I. (Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews) Samuel H. Kress Collection 1939.1.143 ENTRY The Crucifixion is enacted in front of the crenellated wall of the city of Jerusalem. The cross is flanked above by four fluttering angels, three of whom collect the blood that flows from the wounds in Christ’s hands and side. To the left of the Cross, the Holy Women, a compact group, support the swooning Mary, mother of Jesus. Mary Magdalene kneels at the foot of the Cross, caressing Christ’s feet with her hands. To the right of the Cross stand Saint John the Evangelist, in profile, and a group of soldiers with the centurion in the middle, distinguished by a halo, who recognizes the Son of God in Jesus.[1] The painting’s small size, arched shape, and composition suggest that it originally belonged to a portable altarpiece, of which it formed the central panel’s upper tier [fig. 1].[2] The hypothesis was first advanced by Evelyn Sandberg-Vavalà (originally drafted 1939, published 1969), who based it on stylistic, compositional, and iconographic affinities between a small triptych now in the Galleria Nazionale of Parma [fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinabeattie Cta Paper Final
    Paper given at the Annual Conference of the Catholic Theological Association of Great Britain 2006 Insight beyond sight: Sacramentality, Gender and the Eucharist with reference to the Isenheim Altarpiece 1 Tina Beattie Since Vatican II, the Eucharist has become riven by different interpretations, and gender has become an elusive but persistent theme that haunts the margins of our liturgical coherence. My concerns in this paper are with the relationship of the desiring and suffering body to the sacramental encounter between word and flesh in the unfolding drama of the Mass, and with the extent to which gender functions as a lens through which to view the mystery of Christ in the incarnation and the Eucharist. My argument is that both feminist and neo-orthodox theology 2 exaggerate the significance of gender and sexuality, and in so doing they make the sacramental life of the Church hostage to ideological struggles. I suggest that a more poetic and fluid understanding of gender might enable us to go beyond what many see as the rationalisation of worship after Vatican II, through the rekindling of a sense of mystery which resists the nostalgic mystique that infects much contemporary theology, not least through the cultic sex and death fantasies of Hans Urs von Balthasar. I have divided the paper into three parts, so that it is intended to form a reflective tryptich on the eucharist. In the first part, I consider some of the criticisms that have been made regarding the modern liturgy. In the second part, I contemplate the sacramental vision that informs Grünewald’s Isenheim altar.
    [Show full text]
  • Pontormo's Capponi Chapel* Leosteinberg
    385 Pontormo's Capponi Chapel* LeoSteinberg Pontormo's work in the Capponi Chapel in Santa Felicita, as "Christ is taken away from His Mother, towards the Florence, began in I525 with the decoration of its hemis- tomb... the Virgin's gesture... becomes one of farewell." pherical dome, a fresco of God the Father surrounded by Meanwhile, on the vault surface directly opposite, the figure four patriarchs. The fresco was followed by four circular of God the Father (known to us from the Uffizi drawings, panels for the pendentives with bust portraits of the evan- Figs. 4-5) extends his right hand in "a gesture of sublime gelists, partly Bronzino's work,1 and by the great altar- compassion and benediction directed across the Chapel to the piece, variously called Descentfrom the Cross (or Deposition), dead Christ." "The fusion by gesture and emotion of dome Pietd, or Entombment (Fig. I).2 The final work, datable in and altarpiece has the effect that the subject-matter of the 1528, was the fresco of the Annunciationon the window wall. parts also becomes one, and that an action takes place across This last, the four tondi, and the altarpiece in its rich the space of the chapel."6 period frame are intact. The cupola decoration was lost In what follows, I will have to quarrel with almost every when the original dome was destroyed to make way for the detail of Shearman's analysis. But my disagreements, in- present shallower vault; nor do we know whether this oc- stead of invalidating, will, I believe, confirm his essential curred in the sixteenth or the eighteenth century.3 In fact, intuition.
    [Show full text]
  • The Friedsam Annunciation and the Problem of the Ghent Altarpiece Author(S): Erwin Panofsky Reviewed Work(S): Source: the Art Bulletin, Vol
    The Friedsam Annunciation and the Problem of the Ghent Altarpiece Author(s): Erwin Panofsky Reviewed work(s): Source: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 17, No. 4 (Dec., 1935), pp. 432-473 Published by: College Art Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3045596 . Accessed: 14/06/2012 19:48 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. College Art Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Art Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org THE FRIEDSAM ANNUNCIATIONAND THE PROBLEMOF THE GHENT ALTARPIECE By ERWIN PANOFSKY N 1932 the collection of Early Flemish paintings in the Metropolitan Museum of New York was enriched by a fine and rather enigmatical Annunciation acquired and formerly owned by Col. Michael Friedsam (Fig. I). It has been tentatively attributed to Petrus Cristus, with the reservation, however, that it is "almost a van Eyck."1 To the attribution to Petrus Cristus there are several objections. The Friedsam painting does not show the technical characteristics of the other works by this master (the handling of the medium being "more archaic," as I learn from an eminent American X-ray expert,2 nor does it fit into his artistic development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Icon of the Pochayiv Mother of God: a Sacred Relic Between East and West
    The Icon of the Pochayiv Mother of God: A Sacred Relic between East and West Franklin Sciacca Hamilton College Clinton, New York Introduction There are myriad icons of the Mother of God that are designated as “miracle-working” (chudotvornyi in Ukrainian and Russian) in the Orthodox and Catholic lands of Eastern Europe. Thaumaturgic powers are often ascribed to the icon itself and therefore such panels are venerated with particular devotion. Pilgrims seek physical contact with these objects. From the lands of medieval Kievan Rus’, there are four surviving icons with Byzantine pedigree that achieved “miracle- working” status as early as the 11th c.: The Vladimir icon (known in Ukrainian tradition as Vyshhorod, after the location of the convent north of Kiev where it was originally kept); the Kievo-Pechersk icon of the Dormition; the Kholm icon (attributed to Evangelist Luke); and the so-called Black Madonna of Częstochowa (originally housed in Belz, and for the last 600 years in the Jasna Gora monastery in Poland). All of them are surrounded by complex folkloric legends of origin and accounts of miraculous interventions. In later centuries, numerous other wonder-working icons appeared in Ukrainian, Belarusian, Russian, Polish, Balkan lands, Figure 1: Pochayiv Mother Of among which is a relative late-comer (known from the late 16th c.)--The icon God in Dormition Cathedral, of the Mother and Child that was venerated at the Pochayiv monastery in Western Pochayiv Lavra. Ukraine. This small, originally domestic, icon achieved significant cult status throughout Eastern Europe, both in Orthodox and Catholic milieus. This article seeks to examine the origin of the icon in the context of the development of the monastery whose reputation was built as its repository.
    [Show full text]
  • Scenes from the Passion of Christ: the Crucifixion [Middle Panel]
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Italian Paintings of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries Andrea Vanni Andrea di Vanni Sienese, c. 1330 - 1413 Scenes from the Passion of Christ: The Crucifixion [middle panel] 1380s tempera on panel painted surface: 46.9 × 49 cm (18 7/16 × 19 5/16 in.) overall: 56.9 × 57.9 × 3.4 cm (22 3/8 × 22 13/16 × 1 5/16 in.) Inscription: lower center on original frame of the panel, some of the letters restored: ANDREAS UANNIS / DE SENIS / ME PINXIT (Andreas di Vanni of Siena painted me); above the cross, in gold bordered by red rectangle: INRI; on red flag, in gold: SPQR Corcoran Collection (William A. Clark Collection) 2014.79.711.b ENTRY This highly detailed panel from a triptych by the Sienese painter Andrea di Vanni is a recent addition to the National Gallery of Art collection. One of the most prominent works acquired from the Corcoran Gallery of Art, the altarpiece consists of three panels depicting stories from the Passion of Christ. Attached by modern hinges, the two lateral panels can be folded over the central painting to protect it and facilitate transportation. When opened, the triptych’s panels represent, from left to right, Christ’s Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane, the Crucifixion, and the Descent into Limbo. Placed against a gold ground, each scene is set on a rocky outcropping that extends from one panel to the next, creating a formal coherence among scenes that took place at different times and places. Scenes from the Passion of Christ: The Crucifixion [middle panel] 1 © National Gallery of Art, Washington National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Italian Paintings of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries The altarpiece’s left wing contains several episodes presented in a continuous narrative.
    [Show full text]
  • Madonna and Child on a Curved Throne C
    National Gallery of Art NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART ONLINE EDITIONS Italian Paintings of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries Byzantine 13th Century (possibly from Constantinople) Byzantine 13th Century Madonna and Child on a Curved Throne c. 1260/1280 tempera on linden panel painted surface: 82.4 x 50.1 cm (32 7/16 x 19 3/4 in.) overall: 84 x 53.5 cm (33 1/16 x 21 1/16 in.) framed: 90.8 x 58.3 x 7.6 cm (35 3/4 x 22 15/16 x 3 in.) Andrew W. Mellon Collection 1937.1.1 ENTRY The painting shows the Madonna seated frontally on an elaborate, curved, two-tier, wooden throne of circular plan. [1] She is supporting the blessing Christ child on her left arm according to the iconographic tradition of the Hodegetria. [2] Mary is wearing a red mantle over an azure dress. The child is dressed in a salmon-colored tunic and blue mantle; he holds a red scroll in his left hand, supporting it on his lap. [3] In the upper corners of the panel, at the height of the Virgin’s head, two medallions contain busts of two archangels [fig. 1] [fig. 2], with their garments surmounted by loroi and with scepters and spheres in their hands. [4] It was Bernard Berenson (1921) who recognized the common authorship of this work and Enthroned Madonna and Child and who concluded—though admitting he had no specialized knowledge of art of this cultural area—that they were probably works executed in Constantinople around 1200.
    [Show full text]