Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permit Applications September 2009 HQ-09938 Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permit Applications EXECUTIVE SUMMARY September 2009 HQ-09938 _____________________________________________________________________________________________Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits CONTENTS Section Page Acronyms and Abbreviations......................................................................................................ES-ii ES.1 Introduction.........................................................................................................................ES-1 ES.2 Purpose and Need for the Action........................................................................................ES-2 ES.3 Proposed Action .................................................................................................................ES-2 ES.4 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................ES-4 ES.5 Summary of Environmental Consequences........................................................................ES-4 Exhibit ES-1 Estimated Annual Proportion of Flight Profiles.................................................................ES-3 ES-2 Launch Sites and Associated Launch and Reentry Activities ...........................................ES-3 ES-3 Potential General Environmental Impacts under the Proposed Action ….........................ES-6 ES-4 Potential Site-Specific Environmental Impacts under the Proposed Action…..................ES-8 _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary ES-i _____________________________________________________________________________________________Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AST Office of Commercial Space Transportation CCAFS Cape Canaveral Air Force Station CFR Code of Federal Regulations Cl chlorine CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CSLAA Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004 dBA A-weighted decibels DNL day/night average sound level EA environmental assessment EIS environmental impact statement FAA Federal Aviation Administration H+ hydrogen ions H2O water HCl hydrogen chloride KLC Kodiak Launch Complex KSC John F. Kennedy Space Center LC Launch Complex MARS Mid-Atlantic Regional Spaceport NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NOX nitrogen oxides PEIS Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement PM particulate matter PM10 particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 microns SOX sulfur oxides U.S. United States VOC volatile organic compound _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ES-ii Executive Summary _____________________________________________________________________________________________Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES.1 Introduction The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST) regulates the commercial space transportation industry to ensure public safety for licensed U.S. launch activities and to support the continued growth and expansion of the U.S. space transportation industry. In fulfilling its mission and in accordance with the Commercial Space Launch Amendments Act of 2004 (CSLAA), the FAA issues (1) licenses for commercial launches of expendable and reusable launch vehicles and reentry activities, (2) licenses for the operation of commercial launch and reentry sites, and (3) experimental permits for the launch and reentry of developmental reusable suborbital rockets. The CSLAA directs the FAA to promote the development of the emerging commercial space flight industry; makes the FAA responsible for regulating private human space flight under 49 United States Code Subtitle IX, Chapter 701, Commercial Space Launch Activities (formerly the Commercial Space Launch Act); and establishes the Experimental Permit Program for launching developmental reusable suborbital rockets on suborbital trajectories. Under 49 U.S.C 70105a, an applicant must propose to operate a reusable suborbital rocket for one of the following purposes: • Research and development to test new design concepts, new equipment, or new operating techniques; • A showing of compliance with requirements for obtaining a license; or • Crew training before obtaining a license for a launch or reentry using the design of the rocket for which the permit would be issued. The FAA prepared this Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS) with cooperation from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the U.S. Air Force to examine the environmental impacts of an alternative approach for complying with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) when reviewing applications for reusable suborbital rockets operating under experimental permits. The intent of this PEIS is to facilitate the preparation of environmental documents for the issuance of experimental permits to individual launch operators. By providing information and analyses common to all reusable suborbital rockets, the FAA may choose to tier future environmental documents, either an environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement (EIS), as appropriate, from this PEIS to focus on environmental impacts specific to an applicant’s proposed operations under an experimental permit. Tiering from this PEIS would eliminate repetitive discussions of recurring issues and focus on the actual issues that are ready for decision. In addition, by providing information and analyses common to all reusable suborbital rockets and analyzing the environmental impacts of the use of such rockets at specified facilities, this PEIS could also provide the streamlining benefit of avoiding a duplicate NEPA analysis because some experimental permit applications would not require further NEPA analysis (an EA or EIS) for a decision about whether to grant an applicant an experimental permit. Rather, this PEIS would serve as the NEPA document for that decision, but only after the FAA/AST documented that the impacts of the pending permit decision have been analyzed or addressed in this PEIS. This PEIS will not authorize the launch or reentry of reusable suborbital rockets from launch sites. Individual launch operators would be required to coordinate with site operators to gain access to a site. In addition, the launch operators would be required to apply to the FAA for an experimental permit, which would require an individual safety and environmental review. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary ES-1 _____________________________________________________________________________________________Final Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement for Streamlining the Processing of Experimental Permits ES.2 Purpose and Need for the Action The purpose of the FAA Proposed Action is to facilitate the issuance of experimental permits for the launch and/or reentry of reusable suborbital rockets by streamlining the environmental review portion of the application. Environmental documents tiering from this PEIS would eliminate repetitive discussions of recurring issues and when necessary focus those environmental documents on any unaddressed impacts or issues ready for decision. In addition, the Proposed Action would further the mission of the FAA to promote the growth of the U.S. space transportation industry while protecting public health and safety, the safety of property, and U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. The need for the FAA Proposed Action results from the statutory direction from Congress to facilitate commercial rocket developers’ research and development associated with testing new design concepts, new equipment, or new operating techniques; compliance with requirements; and training of flight crews. Facilitating the issuance of experimental permits implements the direction and intent Congress provided to the FAA in the CSLAA. In addition, the need for the Proposed Action is to aid the permitting process to meet the 120-day deadline Congress imposed under the CSLAA. ES.3 Proposed Action Under the Proposed Action, which is the FAA’s preferred alternative, the FAA would issue experimental permits for the launch and reentry of reusable suborbital rockets from both FAA-licensed and non- licensed launch sites using this PEIS as the basis for determining the environmental consequences of issuing the permits. The information and analyses provided in this PEIS would be used to facilitate the preparation of environmental documents for the issuance of experimental permits to individual rocket operators. Because this PEIS presents information and analyses common to all reusable suborbital rockets, the FAA could choose to tier future environmental documents from the PEIS to focus on environmental impacts specific to an applicant’s proposed operations under an experimental permit. Tiering from this PEIS would eliminate repetitive discussions of recurring issues and focus on the issues that are ready for decision. So long as the activities analyzed in
Recommended publications
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name; Legend: Page 94 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 ALTERNATE NATURESERVE PRIMARY MAJOR SUB- U.S. N U.S. 2005 NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME(S) COMMON NAME GROUP GROUP G RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 Pseudoscorpion 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Minimal Impact Exploration Operation Near Tyrone in Grant County, New Mexico Westland Project No
    November 4, 2019 Mr. Michael Tompson NEW MEXICO MINING AND MINERALS DIVISION State of New Mexico Energy, Mineral and Natural Resources Department 1220 South Saint Francis Drive Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505 Re: PERMIT APPLICATION FOR MINIMAL IMPACT EXPLORATION OPERATION NEAR TYRONE IN GRANT COUNTY, NEW MEXICO WESTLAND PROJECT NO. 1883.18 Dear Mr. Tompson: On behalf of BHP Mineral Resources Inc., please find enclosed the permit application for minimal impact exploration drilling on Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land in Grant County, New Mexico. The project is designed to locate economic mineral deposits at one drilling site located southeast of Tyrone, New Mexico. The attached includes seven (7) copies of the Part 3 permit application with associated attachments to facilitate your review of the application. If you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Respectfully, WestLand Resources, Inc. Amanda Best Senior Environmental Specialist ALB:kd Attachment: Part 3 Minimal Impact Exploration Operation Permit Application 1. BLM Mining Notice for Exploration Drilling 2. BLM Claims 3. Class III Cultural Resources Survey Report 4. Biological Evaluation 5. Directions to Site 6. Forms WD-08 and WR-07 Application fee – Check # 136610 cc: Meghan Chesal, BHP Mineral Resources Inc. Santiago Gonzalez, BHP Mineral Resources Inc. Q:\Jobs\1800's\1883.18\ENV\04_State\20191104_Submittal_NM_State\20191104_Transmittal_Ltr.docx ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS 4001 E. Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona
    [Show full text]
  • Ipac Resource List
    IPaC Information for Planning and Consultation U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service IPaC resource list This report is an automatically generated list of species and other resources such as critical habitat (collectively referred to as trust resources) under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (USFWS) jurisdiction that are known or expected to be on or near the project area referenced below. The list may also include trust resources that occur outside of the project area, but that could potentially be directly or indirectly affected by activities in the project area. However, determining the likelihood and extent of effects a project may have on trust resources typically requires gathering additional site-specific (e.g., vegetation/species surveys) and project-specific (e.g., magnitude and timing of proposed activities) information. Below is a summary of the project information you provided and contact information for the USFWS office(s) with jurisdiction in the defined project area. Please read the introduction to each section that follows (Endangered Species, Migratory Birds, USFWS Facilities, and NWI Wetlands) for additional information applicable to the trust resources addressed in that section. Location Arizona and New Mexico Local offices Arizona Ecological Services Field Office (602) 242-0210 (602) 242-2513 9828 North 31st Ave #c3 Phoenix, AZ 85051-2517 http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arizona/ http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/EndangeredSpecies_Main.html New Mexico Ecological Services Field Office (505) 346-2525 (505) 346-2542 2105 Osuna Road Ne Albuquerque, NM 87113-1001 http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/NewMexico/ http://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/ES_Lists_Main2.html Endangered species This resource list is for informational purposes only and does not constitute an analysis of project level impacts.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior
    Friday J uary 6, 1989 MEN Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Animal Notice of Review • 554 Federal Register / Vol. 54, No. 4 / Friday, January 6, 1989 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Regional Director (FWE/SE), U.S. Fish least at times, to merit conSideration for and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, addition to the List of Endangered and Fish and Wildlife Service Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 (505/ Threatened Wildlife. The accompanying 766-2321 or FTS 474-2321). table identifies many of these taxa 50 CFR Part 17 Region 3. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, (including, by definition, biological Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, subspecies and certain populations of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Wisconsin. vertebrate animals) and assigns each to and Plants; Animal Notice of Review Regional Director (AE/SE), U.S. Fish one of the three categories described AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, and Wildlife Service, Federal Building, below. Unless it is the subject of a Interior. Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, Minnesota current published proposed or final rule 55111 (612/725-3276 or FTS 725-3276). determining endangered or threatened Notice of review. ACTION: Region 4. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, status, none of these taxa receives Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, SUMMARY: The Service issues a revised substantive or procedural protection notice identifying vertebrate and Mississippi, North Carolina, South pursuant to the Act (those species that invertebrate animal taxa, native to the Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and are the subject of a proposed or final the Virgin Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Psyche 101:1
    PSYCHE 1.101 1994 NO.1-2 Floyd Gerald Werner, 1 99 1 FLOYD GERALD WERNER 192 1-1992 ^loyd Gerald Werner was born June 1, 192 1, to Frank and Edith mper Werner. He attended the public schools in Ottawa, Illinois here his career in insects began with his first publication in partment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 uscrim received 7 December 1993, 1 2 Psyche [vo~.101 1938, an account of the habitat and behavior of Doru aculeatum (Scudder), an earwig found in the marshes of northern Illinois. His love of science was fostered by a high school teacher, Charles J. Alikonis. Upon graduation Floyd enrolled at Harvard College. In 1943, he was awarded a bachelor's degree in Biology, magna cum laude. At this time he was initiated into Phi Beta Kappa and Sigma Xi. Dur- ing these undergraduate years Floyd served as a student assistant in the Coleoptera Section of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, where he discovered many treasures that he would work on later in his career. World War I1 interrupted Floyd's college career, giving him the opportunity to serve as an entomologist with the U.S. Army in the South Pacific. His medical survey unit worked with mosquitoes and malaria in Okinawa and Korea. In 195 1 he returned to Okinawa at the request of the Pacific Science Board to study sweet potato pests, as sweet potatoes were the chief source of carbohydrates for a pop- ulation still in post-war recovery. In 1946-47, Floyd returned to the South Pacific as part of a sci- entific expedition charged with surveying the flora and fauna of the Philippine Islands, particularly Luzon, Mindanao and Palawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Statewide Public Involvement Plan for Formerly Used Defense Sites in New Mexico
    DRAFT STATEWIDE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES IN NEW MEXICO Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Albuquerque District Contract No. W9128F-04-D-0005 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—Privileged and Confidential Attorney/Client Work Product—Privileged March 2006 DRAFT STATEWIDE PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT PLAN FOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES IN NEW MEXICO Prepared for U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Albuquerque District 4101 Jefferson Plaza Northeast Albuquerque, New Mexico 87109 Prepared by HydroGeoLogic, Inc. 1155 Herndon Parkway, Suite 900 Herndon, Virginia 20170 March 2006 The findings, opinions, and conclusions contained in this report are solely those of HydroGeoLogic, Inc. These findings, opinions, and conclusions do not necessarily reflect the position of the United States of America, or any of its departments or agencies. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................1 1.1 Background .......................................................1 1.2 Goals of Community Relations and Public Outreach Programs ..................2 1.3 FUDS and Risk Communication ........................................4 2.0 NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY PROFILE ...................................11 2.1 State History .....................................................11 2.1.1 Native American Pueblos ......................................11 2.1.2 Spanish Colonization .........................................11 2.1.3 Mexican Province ...........................................12 2.1.4 American Territory
    [Show full text]
  • 20080905 Ecol Sustain Rpt Ap
    Appendix B Comprehensive Species List A comprehensive list of species (including plant, macro-lichen, bird, insect, and animal species) that have population or habitat concerns and that are found in Texas, New Mexico, and Oklahoma was developed. This list includes 1,655 species and was developed using: 1. Lists maintained under the Ecological Services Agency of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (US FWS 2007a, US FWS 2007b, US FWS 2007c), 2. Species ranks maintained by NatureServe (US FWS 2007b), 3. New Mexico, Texas, and Oklahoma State lists (NMDGF 2006a, ODWC 2007, TPWD 2007a, CWCS priority lists), 4. Species for which there are local concerns resulting from declines in habitat, population, and/or distribution (ODWC 2005, NMDGF 2006b, TPWD 2007b), 5. Species that are of high public interest, and 6. Species that have emerging issues (such as invasive species). Taxon: A = amphibian, B = bird, C = crustacean, F = fish, In = insect, L = lichen, Lv = liverwort, M = mammal, Mo = moss, Ms = mussel, P = plant, R = reptile, Sp = spider Background Color Green: Are the species found on Cibola National Grasslands Occurs on Scientific Name Common Name Taxon Grasslands? Ammodramus bairdii Baird's sparrow B Yes 1 Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald eagle B Yes 2 Vireo bellii Bell's vireo B Yes 3 Athene cunicularia hypugaea Burrowing Owl B Yes 4 Aimophila cassinii Cassin's sparrow B Yes 5 Buteo regalis Ferruginous hawk B Yes 6 Aquila chrysaetos Golden eagle B Yes 7 Ammodramus savannarum Grasshopper sparrow B Yes 8 Picoides villosus Hairy woodpecker B Yes
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Scientific Species List
    DEIS – River Management Alternatives for the Appendix D USIBWC Rio Grande Canalization Project (RGCP) Species List APPENDIX D SCIENTIFIC SPECIES LIST Table D-1. Index of Scientific Names for Plant Species Category Common Name Scientific Name Buttercup Ranunculus cymbalaria Forb / Herb Cattail Typha spp. Russian thistle Salsola kali Saltbush Atriplex spp. Black gama Bouteloua eriopoda Reed grass Pragmites australis G rasses Rush Juncus spp. Salt grass Distichlis spicatai Sedge Carex spp. Tubosa Hilaria mutica Creosote bush Larrea tridentate False indigo Amorpha fruticosa Shrub Snakeweed Gutierrezia sarothra Tarbush Flourensia cernua Wolfberry Lycium berlandieri Yucca Yucca spp. Acacia Acacia spp. Ash Fraxinus spp. Berlandier ash Fraxinus berlandieri Cottonwood Populus fremontii Desert willow Chilopis linearis Little walnut Juglans microcarpa Tree Mesquite Prosopis spp. Netleaf hackberry Celtis reticulata New Mexico olive Forestiera pubescens Russian olive Elaeagnus angustifolia Salt cedar Tamarix chinensis, Tamarix spp. Seep willow Baccharis glutinosa Western chokeberry Prunus virginiana Willow Salix gooddingii D-1 DRAFT December 2003 DEIS – River Management Alternatives for the Appendix D USIBWC Rio Grande Canalization Project (RGCP) Species List Table D-2. Index of Scientific Names for Animal Species Category Common Name Scientific Name Desert pocket gopher Geomys bursarius Mammal Jackrabbit Lepus calinifornicus Occult little brown bat Myotis lucifugus occultus Pecos River muskrat Ondatra zibethicus ripensis Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics, Systematics, and Phylogeny of Lytta, a Genus of Blister Beetles (COLEOPTERA, MELOIDAE) Lytta Magister, Male (Drawing by F
    HI men JSQH KSKS9 L I B R.A R.Y OF THE U N I VERSITY OF 1 LL1 NOIS 5T0.5 I LL v. E5-30 CO 2 r The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its return to the library from which it was withdrawn on or before the Latest Date stamped below. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of books are reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN *J'W)!NGUS£ V SEP 197 «£? .«>*' BUILDING U3E JUN 14 1^79 JUN 1 h iS7<i WILDING USE ONI* SEf L161 — O-1096 Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with funding from University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign http://www.archive.org/details/bionomicssystema28sela Bionomics, Systematics, and Phylogeny of Lytta, a Genus of Blister Beetles (Coleoptera, Meloidae) RICHARD B. SELANDER Illinois biological monographs: Number 28 THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PRESS URBANA, 1960 ILLINOIS BIOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS is the general title for a series of mono- graphs in botany, entomology, zoology, and allied fields. Volumes 1 through 24 con- tained four issues each and were available through subscription. Beginning with number 25 (issued in 1957), each publication is numbered consecutively. No subscriptions are available, but standing orders will be accepted for forthcoming numbers. Prices of previous issues still in print are listed below, and these may be purchased from the University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois. Requests for exchange arrangements should be addressed to the Exchange Department, University Library, Urbana, Illinois. BAKER, FRANK COLLINS (1922): The Mol- GAMBILL, WILLIAM G., jr.
    [Show full text]
  • Floyd Gerald Werner 1921–1992
    PSYCHE Vol. 101 1994 No. 1-2 Courtesy of Frances Werner Floyd Gerald Werner, 1991 FLOYD GERALD WERNER 1921-1992 BY CARL A. OLSON Floyd Gerald Werner was born June 1, 1921, to Frank and Edith Mumper Werner. He attended the public schools in Ottawa, Illinois and here his career in insects began with his first publication in Department of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 Manuscript received 7 December 1993. 2 Psyche [Vol. 101 1938, an account of the habitat and behavior of Doru aculeatum (Scudder), an earwig found in the marshes of northern Illinois. His love of science was fostered by a high school teacher, Charles J. Alikonis. Upon graduation Floyd enrolled at Harvard College. In 1943, he was awarded a bachelor's degree in Biology, magna cum laude. At this time he was initiated into Phi Beta Kappa and Sigma Xi. Dur- ing these undergraduate years Floyd served as a student assistant in the Coleoptera Section of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, where he discovered many treasures that he would work on later in his career. World War II interrupted Floyd's college career, giving him the opportunity to serve as an entomologist with the U.S. Army in the South Pacific. His medical survey unit worked with mosquitoes and malaria in Okinawa and Korea. In 1951 he returned to Okinawa at the request of the Pacific Science Board to study sweet potato pests, as sweet potatoes were the chief source of carbohydrates for a pop- ulation still in post-war recovery. In 1946-47, Floyd returned to the South Pacific as part of a sci- entific expedition charged with surveying the flora and fauna of the Philippine Islands, particularly Luzon, Mindanao and Palawa.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Service Sensitive Species That Are Not Listed Or Proposed Under the ESA Sorted By: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci
    Forest Service Sensitive Species that are not listed or proposed under the ESA Sorted by: Major Group, Subgroup, NS Sci. Name, 1 December 2004 REGION 10 REGION 1 REGION 2 REGION 3 REGION 4 REGION 5 REGION 6 REGION 8 REGION 9 MAJOR NS T NS U.S. N U.S. NATURESERVE SCIENTIFIC NAME NATURESERVE COMMON NAME GROUP SUBGROUP NS G RANK RANK RANK ESA C 9 Anahita punctulata Southeastern Wandering Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G4 NNR 9 Apochthonius indianensis A Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1G2 N1N2 9 Apochthonius paucispinosus Dry Fork Valley Cave PseudoscorpionInvertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Erebomaster flavescens A Cave Obligate Harvestman Invertebrate Arachnid G3G4 N3N4 9 Hesperochernes mirabilis Cave Psuedoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G5 N5 8 Hypochilus coylei A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G3? NNR 8 Hypochilus sheari A Lampshade Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 NNR 9 Kleptochthonius griseomanus An Indiana Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Kleptochthonius orpheus Orpheus Cave Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 9 Kleptochthonius packardi A Cave Obligate Pseudoscorpion Invertebrate Arachnid G2G3 N2N3 9 Nesticus carteri A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid GNR NNR 8 Nesticus cooperi Lost Nantahala Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1 N1 8 Nesticus crosbyi A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G1? NNR 8 Nesticus mimus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2 NNR 8 Nesticus sheari A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 8 Nesticus silvanus A Cave Spider Invertebrate Arachnid G2? NNR 9 Porhomma cavernicola Appalachian
    [Show full text]