Update on Conflict and Diplomacy 16 NOVEMBER 2017–15 FEBRUARY 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update on Conflict and Diplomacy 16 NOVEMBER 2017–15 FEBRUARY 2018 Update on Conflict and Diplomacy 16 NOVEMBER 2017–15 FEBRUARY 2018 COMPILED BY PAUL KAROLYI This update is a summary of bilateral, multilateral, regional, and international events affecting the Palestinians and Israel. More than 100 print, wire, television, and online sources providing U.S., Israeli, Arab, and international independent and government coverage of unfolding events are surveyed to compile the quarterly Update. The most relevant sources are cited in JPS’s Chronology section, which tracks events day by day. JPS Chronologies are archived on the JPS website at www.palestine-studies.org. Highlights of the Quarter: Nearly every major action within Palestine and Israel this quarter is predicated on U.S. president Donald Trump’s pledges to move the U.S. embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem and to formally recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, reversing decades of U.S. policy. The decision provokes an international backlash, sparks a wave of protests and clashes in the occupied Palestinian territories, compromises U.S. diplomatic efforts, and encourages Israel to further advance settlement and annexation plans. While the Israelis celebrate Trump’s decision, the Palestinians argue that it illustrates Washington’s pro-Israel bias and refuse to accept the United States as the sole mediator in any future peace talks. Outraged, Trump orders punitive cuts to U.S. humanitarian aid dedicated to Palestinian refugees, further undercutting any peace initiative, which advisors insist is still underway. The Palestinians begin pursuing a new, multilateral framework to continue the peace process. Amid these developments, the Palestinian national reconciliation process stalls once again. Lastly, the arrest of teenage activist Ahed Tamimi causes an outpouring of support and casts the plight of Palestinian children detained in Israeli prisons into the spotlight worldwide. THE PALESTINIAN-ISRAELI support elsewhere. Israel’s right-wing CONFLICT government lauded Trump’s decision to With his peace initiative struggling to gain recognize Jerusalem, seizing the opportunity to traction, U.S. president Donald Trump fulfilled further alter the borders of the municipality of his campaign promise and recognized Jerusalem, strengthen the settlement enterprise, Jerusalem as Israel’s capital this quarter. The and implement new measures against the move enraged the Palestinians and pushed the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Palestinian Authority (PA) to seek diplomatic movement. Journal of Palestine Studies Vol. XLVII, No. 3 (Spring 2018), p. 135, ISSN: 0377-919X; electronic ISSN: 1533-8614. © 2018 by the Institute for Palestine Studies. All rights reserved. Please direct all requests for permission to photocopy or reproduce article content through the University of California Press’s Reprints and Permissions web page, http://www.ucpress.edu/journals.php?p=reprints. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2018.47.3.135. Spring 2018 || 135 Update on Conflict and Diplomacy THE TRUMP INITIATIVE Department official told Israeli newspaper As the quarter opened, the Palestinians were Haaretz (11/17) that the move should not be increasingly frustrated with Trump, his peace interpreted as meaning the United States was envoys, and their biased approach to the backing off its work with the Palestinians. Palestinian-Israeli conflict. Ever since entering The Palestinians interpreted the message office in 1/2017, the U.S. administration had differently. A PA spokesperson described “ ” tacitly approved of Israeli government moves (11/18) the move as dangerous and “ to hasten settlement construction in the West unprecedented in the relationship between ” Bank, offering only a promise to work on a Washington and the Arab world. It was plan to restart final-status negotiations evidence that the United States was losing its between the Palestinians and Israelis. status as a fair mediator in the peace process, “ The Trump administration promised to and, he claimed, it delivered a prize for Israel, which is trying to thwart American efforts by deliver the plan in early 2018, but the continuing to build in the settlements and president was angered by the comments PA opposing the two-state solution.” Abbas warned president Mahmoud Abbas made at the the Trump administration that if the PLO’s United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) Washington office were shuttered, he would meeting in 9/2017: In his UN speech, Abbas indefinitely suspend all Palestinian contacts stated, “[We] have called on the International with U.S. officials. Or, as PA foreign minister Criminal Court [ICC] to open an investigation Riyad al-Maliki put it on 11/18, the Palestinians and to prosecute Israeli officials for their would not give into “extortion.” He added, “The involvement in settlement activities and ball is now in the American court.” aggressions against our people.” Two months On 11/21, a State Department spokesperson later, the Associated Press reported that the said that U.S. officials were still discussing with State Department had informed the PA that their Palestinian counterparts the status of the the Washington office of the Palestinian PLO office in Washington as well as the larger Liberation Organization (PLO) delegation to issue of the “comprehensive peace process.” the United States would be closed unless the A PA official later confirmed that low-level Palestinians resumed peace talks with the contacts were ongoing, but al-Maliki refuted Israelis. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson alleged the broader claim. On 11/22, the Arab press ’ that Abbas s comments triggered a provision reported that Abbas had refused to take a phone in the 2016 Consolidated Appropriations Act call from Trump’s senior advisor and son-in- barring the operation of such an office if the law, Jared Kushner. Abbas reportedly referred “ Palestinians supported or took any action to Kushner to the PLO office in Washington. influence” an ICC investigation into Israeli war A week after the Associated Press report crimes. The Palestinians had been pursuing kicked off the controversy, the United States ICC action against Israel for years without any began to walk back its position. On 11/24, a U.S. invocation of the purported provision, State Department official announced that the and the State Department’s new interpretation PLO office would be allowed to remain open for of the law in question appeared to signal a new at least ninety more days. “The relevant statute phase in U.S.-Palestinian relations. As though provides that if, after ninety days, the President to dispel any such impression, a State determines the Palestinians are engaged in 136 || Journal of Palestine Studies Update on Conflict and Diplomacy direct and meaningful negotiations with Israel, would “take the region into [. .] instability.” restrictions on the PLO and its Washington A Hamas spokesperson threatened (12/2) an office may be lifted,” the official stated. “We “escalation of the Jerusalem intifada” should the have advised the PLO office to limit its activities U.S. embassy be moved, referencing the habba, to those related to achieving a lasting, the surge of Palestinian resistance, random comprehensive peace between the Israelis and attacks, and protests that began in Jerusalem in Palestinians.” 9/2015 (see JPS 45 [2]). Abbas personally called (12/2) the leaders of eight Arab states to ask ’ Recognizing Jerusalem as Israel s for their help in pressuring Trump to delay or Capital cancel the proposed embassy move. According As December approached, Trump was again to a PA spokesperson, Abbas “warned faced with the issue of the location of the U.S. categorically that taking such a step would lead embassy and whether he would sign a six- to the destruction of the peace process” and month waiver that would circumvent a 1995 propel the region into turmoil. law requiring that it be relocated from Tel Aviv The Palestinian outcry did little to dissuade to Jerusalem. Though Trump campaigned on Trump. According to a report in the a promise that he would implement the Washington Post, the U.S. president appeared Jerusalem Embassy Act of 1995 and move the “agitated and exasperated” during a meeting U.S. embassy to Jerusalem—thereby gaining with his top advisors on the subject of Jerusalem the support of numerous wealthy donors and on 11/27. “Trump seemed frustrated with the backing of key pro-Israel and evangelical pushback about the potential backlash among groups—he had initially acquiesced to his Palestinians and their supporters,” the report advisors upon taking office and signed the stated. waiver in 6/2017 (see JPS 47 [1]). On 12/5, Trump called Abbas, Israeli prime Now, based upon comments by administration minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Saudi king officials, there was much speculation in the Salman bin Abdulaziz, and Egyptian president media and among analysts that Trump would Abdel Fattah al-Sisi to let them know that he not sign the waiver and that he would recognize planned on making his announcement the Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. following day. At a UN event marking the seventy-year “After more than two decades of waivers, anniversary of the UN’s vote to partition we are no closer to a lasting peace agreement Palestine, U.S. vice president Mike Pence said between Israel and the Palestinians,” Trump (11/28) Trump was still “actively considering” said (12/6), in comments broadcast live from moving the embassy. Two days later, the U.S. the White House’s Diplomatic Reception press reported (11/30) that Trump was planning Room.
Recommended publications
  • Division for Palestinian Rights
    DIVISION FOR PALESTINIAN RIGHTS UNITED NATIONS SEMINAR ON ASSISTANCE TO THE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE United Nations Office at Vienna 24 and 25 March 2010 2 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction ………………………………………………………. 1-4 3 II. Opening session….…………….…………………………………. 5-50 3 III. Plenary sessions.…………………………………………………. 51-113 11 Plenary I ………………………………………………………...... 51-71 11 Plenary II …………………………………………………………. 72-96 15 Plenary III ………………………………………………………… 97-113 19 IV. Closing session …………………………………………………… 114-122 23 Annex List of participants ……………………………………………………………… 25 3 I. Introduction 1. The Committee on the Exercise of the Inalienable Rights of the Palestinian People convened the United Nations Seminar on Assistance to the Palestinian People under the theme “Building institutions and moving forward with establishing the State of Palestine.” In accordance with General Assembly resolutions 64/16 and 64/17. The meeting was held at the United Nations Office at Vienna on 24 and 25 March 2010. 2. The Committee was represented by a delegation comprising Zahir Tanin (Afghanistan), vice-Chairman and head of the delegation; Pedro Núñez Mosquera (Cuba), Vice-Chairman; Saviour F. Borg (Malta), Rapporteur; Minas A. Hadjimichael (Cyprus), and Riyad Mansour (Palestine). 3. The meeting consisted of an opening session, three plenary sessions and a closing session. The themes of the plenary sessions were “The current socio-economic situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territory”, “Looking to the future: advancing the Palestinian State-building agenda” and “International assistance in support of the Palestinian economy”. 4. Presentations were made by 16 experts. Representatives of 54 Member States in addition to the Holy See and Palestine, as well as 4 intergovernmental organizations, 6 United Nations bodies, 13 civil society organizations and the media attended the Meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 218, September 2016 Issue
    Applied Research Institute - Jerusalem (ARIJ) P.O Box 860, Caritas Street – Bethlehem, Phone: (+972) 2 2741889, Fax: (+972) 2 2776966. [email protected] | http://www.arij.org Applied Research Institute – Jerusalem Report on the Israeli Colonization Activities in the West Bank & the Gaza Strip Volume 218, September 2016 Issue http://www.arij.org Bethlehem Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) in Ad Duheisha refugee camp, south of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired rubber bullets and teargas grenades, causing tens of suffocation cases. During the clashes, the IOA arrested Naba’ As Safi after storming and searching his house in the camp. (Al-Quds 1 September 2016) Clashes erupted between Palestinians and the Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) at the western entrance of Tuqu village, southeast of Bethlehem city. The IOA fired rubber bullets and teargas grenades, causing tens of suffocation cases. (Al-Quds 2 September 2016) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) closed with earth mounds an agricultural road in Al Khader village, southwest of Bethlehem city, and prevented Palestinian farmers from entering their lands. (RB2000 2 September 2016) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) seized a Palestinian bulldozer owned by Hassan Salah, while he was using it in the reclamation work in his land in Al Ein ‘Amdan area in Battir town, west of Bethlehem city. (Wafa 7 September 2016) A Palestinian farmer; Hussen Musa, was injured after an Israeli settler hit him by his vehicle while he was crossing the street near An Nashash military checkpoint, at the southern entrance of Al Khader village, southwest of Bethlehem city. (Orient FM 8 September 2016) Israeli Occupation Army (IOA) raided and toured in several areas in Beit Fajjar village, south of Bethlehem city.
    [Show full text]
  • News of Terrorism and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict (March 8
    News of Terrorism and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict (March 8 – 14, 2017) Stabbing attack at the Lion Gate in the Old City of Jerusalem. Left: The scene of the attack. Right: The knife used in the attack (Twitter account of Palinfo, March 13, 2017). Overview n Popular terrorism continues in Judea and Samaria, with a stabbing attack at the Lion Gate in the Old City in east Jerusalem. Two Border Policemen were wounded. The Palestinian attacker was from Jabal Mukaber, an east Jerusalem neighborhood from which many Palestinian terrorist operatives have come. In a separate incident, a Palestinian stabbed an Israeli in an attack that took place near a roadblock south of Bethlehem. The motive for the attack is so far unclear. n On March 10, 2017, Mahmoud Abbas spoke on the phone with Donald Trump, the first conversation since Trump entered the White House. A spokesman for Mahmoud Abbas said Trump had invited Abbas to the White House to discuss ways to renew the peace process. According to Mahmoud Abbas, they discussed their mutual commitment to the peace process and the two-state solution. n Following the revelation that two senior UNRWA employees were elected to the new Hamas political bureau in the Gaza Strip, Israel appealed to the United States and other countries that contribute funds to UNRWA. In response the chairman of the department for refugee affairs in HamasJudea, threatened Samaria andcrises Jerusalem would occur if support for UNRWA were affected. He claimed it was the "right" of every Palestinian who worked for UNRWA to "engage in political activity" [i.e., to belong to Hamas].
    [Show full text]
  • Why Trump's Closure of the Palestinian Diplomatic Mission in Washington Could Backfire by Ghaith Al-Omari
    MENU Policy Analysis / Articles & Op-Eds Why Trump's Closure of the Palestinian Diplomatic Mission in Washington Could Backfire by Ghaith al-Omari Sep 12, 2018 ABOUT THE AUTHORS Ghaith al-Omari Ghaith al-Omari is a senior fellow in The Washington Institute's Irwin Levy Family Program on the U.S.-Israel Strategic Relationship. Articles & Testimony Both sides may have reached a dead end, with Washington seemingly running out of pressure points and the PA increasingly backing away from the eroding diplomatic process. he Trump Administration announced plans Monday to close the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) T mission in Washington D.C., sparking visceral reactions from Palestinian officials. The mission, which serves as a de facto Palestinian embassy, has been given a month to pack up. The move was described by PLO Executive Committee Member Hanan Ashrawi as “crude and vicious blackmail” while the head of the PLO Delegation to the United States, Ambassador Husam Zomlot, called it part of an “ongoing campaign to liquidate our [Palestinian] rights and cause.” The intensity of the Palestinian reactions cannot be explained purely by Monday’s announcement. After all, the PLO mission in Washington was regularly bypassed by senior Palestinian leaders in Ramallah who preferred to directly engage with U.S. officials—whether in terms of bilateral U.S.-Palestinian relations or regarding matters relating to the peace process. But the move is particularly symbolic. And with an escalatory dynamic and heated tensions defining Palestinian-U.S. relations in recent months, the mission’s closure has now become a major flashpoint. The establishment of a PLO mission in Washington in 1994 was a seminal moment.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 from Survival to Destiny Download Sheet
    Survey: 73% oppose a Palestinian state 85% of them Survey: support SOVEREIGNTY ריבונות Sovereignty A APolitical Political Journal Journal / / Issue Issue no. no. 11 7 // AugustMarch 20192016 73% Published by The SovereigntyPublished by Women Movement in Green founded and the by Forum Women for Sovereignty in Green oppose a Palestinion state 85% of them support MAKINGSovereignty PROGRESS NRG Poll, Jan 2016: Are you in favor of the gradual application of Israeli Law in Judea and Samaria? 44% in favor 44% 38% of gradual application In favor Not in favor of Israeli law in Judea and Samaria 18% No opinion 60% 61% 61% 69% 18% 32% of the youth favor of rightwingers of ultra-orthodox of those who dene of those who dene of those who dene the application of favor the favor the themselves themselves as themselves as leftwing the law on the application of law application of law rightwing favor the leftwingers favor the favor the application of entire area on the entire area on the entire area gradual application application of the law the law on the Jewish of the law on the entire area communities From Survival to Destiny The Jewish "Deal of the Century" Minister Haim Katz: Rep. Alan Clemmons: David P. Goldman: TAMAWe need a declaration of commitment 100 forIt is impossible the for Land a Jew to be of Israel Judea and Samaria in to Judea and Samaria as there was an occupier in his own ancestral a region of failed states. STRATEGICfor the Golan OUTLINE Heights PLAN | ISRAEL 2048 homeland, Judea Time is on Israel’s side Page 4 Page6 Page 12 2 / SOVEREIGNTY22
    [Show full text]
  • Netanyahu Formally Denies Charges in Court
    WWW.JPOST.COM THE Volume LXXXIX, Number 26922 JERUSALEFOUNDED IN 1932 M POSTNIS 13.00 (EILAT NIS 11.00) TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2021 27 SHVAT, 5781 Eye in the sky A joint goal Feminist religious art IAI unveils aerial Amos Yadlin on the need to When God, Jesus surveillance system 6 work with Biden to stop Iran and Allah were women Page 6 Page 9 Page 16 How did we miss Netanyahu formally denies charges in court Judges hint witnesses to be called only after election • PM leaves hearing early the exit • By YONAH JEREMY BOB two to three weeks to review these documents before wit- Prime Minister Benjamin nesses are called, that would ramp? Netanyahu’s defense team easily move the first witness fought with the prosecution beyond March 23. ANALYSIS on Monday at the Jerusalem Judge Rivkah Friedman Feld- • By YONAH JEREMY BOB District Court over calling man echoed the prosecution’s witnesses in his public cor- arguments that the defense A lifetime ago when living ruption trial before the March had between one to two years in northern New Jersey, I 23 election. to prepare for witnesses. But often drove further north for It seemed that the judges ultimately the judges did not work. were leaning toward calling seem anxious to call the first Sometimes the correct exit the first witness in late March witness before March 23. was small and easy to miss. or early April, which they A parallel fight between the But there were around five would present as a compro- sides was the prosecution’s or so exits I could use to avoid mise between the sides.
    [Show full text]
  • September 5 2017
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Tuesday, September 5 Headlines: • Russia Threatened to Veto anti-Hezbollah UN Move Led by Israel • Netanyahu Boasts Israel's Success, Mocks Barak • Ex-minister Arrested in Submarine Affair, Minister Likely to be Quizzed • Rivlin Heads to Munich to Unveil Monument to Athletes • IDF to Simulate War with Hezbollah in Largest Drill in Decades • Palestinian activist Arrested for Calling on Abbas to Resign • Churches Protest ‘Attempt to Weaken Our Presence in Jerusalem • Israel to Give $1 Million in aid to Houston's Jewish Community Commentary: • Ma’ariv: “Netanyahu and Israel Hayom: Dangerous Mutation” - By Ben Caspit, columnist at Ma’ariv • Al Monitor: “Is Israel’s Arab Party about to Split?” - By Shlomi Eldar, columnist at Al Monitor Israel Pulse S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts September 5, 2017 Ha’aretz Russia Threatened to Veto anti-Hezbollah UN Move Led by Israel Russia worked behind the scenes to protect Hezbollah during last week's discussions in the UN Security Council on a resolution to renew the mandate of the UN peacekeeping forces (UNIFIL) in southern Lebanon, talks with Israeli officials indicated. In last week’s decision to renew UNIFIL’s mandate several paragraphs were added. However, during the negotiations over the wording of the resolution, significant portions endorsed sought by the United States and Israel were removed, chiefly the direct reference to Hezbollah as conducting prohibited military activity in southern Lebanon that is in violation of Resolution 1701.
    [Show full text]
  • Please Click Here to Download The
    Addameer Prisoners’ Support and Human Rights Association Al-Mezan Center for Human Rights Al-Haq – Defending Human Rights Aldameer Association for Human Rights Huryyat- Centre for Defence of Liberties and Civil Rights Defence for Children International – Palestine Jerusalem Center for Legal Aid and Human Rights BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency Ramallah Center for Human Rights Studies and Refugee Rights Independent commission for Human Rights (Observer) The Palestinian Centre for Human Rights Date: 12.12.2017 PHROC calls on Member States of the European Union to Respect the Legal Status of Jerusalem and to Abide by their Obligations under International Law in the oPt In the fiftieth year of Israel’s unlawful occupation of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, Israel continues to significantly alter the legal status, demographic composition, and character of the city of Jerusalem in violation of international law. International consensus over the past seven decades has rejected any claim by Israel to sovereign rights over the city of Jerusalem, and condemned Israeli measures that have sought to alter the character of the Holy City as having no legal validity whatsoever, as reaffirmed by countless United Nations (UN) resolutions.1 United States (US) President Donald Trump broke with this international consensus on 6 December 2017 when he recognised Jerusalem as the capital of Israel and ordered the relocation of the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. President Trump’s declaration is not only in violation of international law,2 it also deepens Israel’s unlawful annexation of East Jerusalem and its illegal settlement enterprise in and around the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards New Strategies for Palestinian National Liberation
    TOWARDS NEW STRATEGIES FOR PALESTINIAN NATIONAL LIBERATION Options for Achieving Palestinian Strategic Objectives in the Light of the Breakdown of Bilateral Negotiations The Palestine Strategy Group August 2011 1 CONTENTS MEDIA ENQUIRIES 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 INTRODUCTION 9 STRATEGIC PREREQUISITES 11 STRATEGIC SCENARIOS 12 STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES 13 STRATEGIC OPTIONS 14 THE NEED FOR FURTHER STRATEGIC DISCUSSION 25 ACTION PLAN FOR THE NEXT MONTHS 29 CONCLUSION 30 2 MEDIA ENQUIRIES For further information and media enquiries, please contact: - Dr Khaled Hroub , Cambridge University Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 790 008 4284 - Hani Masri , Badael: Palestine Media, Research and Studies Centre, Ramallah Email: [email protected] Tel: +970-59-966-5000 - Dr Husam Zomlot, Founder, Palestine Strategy Group Email: [email protected] Tel: +970-59-713-3765 Also visit http://www.palestinestrategygroup.ps/ 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Palestine Strategy Group (PSG) is an open and inclusive forum for strategic discussion in which Palestinians from across the social and political spectrum conduct strategic analysis of the environment of the conflict with Israel in order to strengthen and guide the Palestinian national project for liberation and independence. The PSG hopes that this paper will contribute to enriching the current national dialogue and assist Palestinian decision-makers in adopting the policies that can best serve the higher Palestinian national interest during this decisive phase of our national struggle. The first part of the PSG’s task was completed in September 2008 with the production of the report Regaining the Initiative - Palestinian Strategic Options for Ending Israeli Occupation . This, along with the work and meetings that preceded it, formed the basis of the second phase of the PSG’s work, which has culminated in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Sadr Faces Hard Challenges After Surprise Win in Iraqi Elections
    Iran’s Qassem Welcoming Jerusalem move, Soleimani Ramadan Gaza violence and in the crosshairs Palestinian Nakba Page 13 Pages 6,21 Pages 4-8, 12 May 20, 2018 Issue 157, Year 4 UK £2 www.thearabweekly.com EU €2.50 Sadr faces hard challenges after surprise win in Iraqi elections ► In a sign of continued interference in Iraqi politics, Tehran sent Major-General Qassem Soleimani, leader of Iran’s al-Quds Force, to Iraq to encourage forming a coalition that does not include Sadr’s supporters. Mamoon Alabbasi Alliance led by Prime Minister partnership is very plausible, Iran Haider al-Abadi, which came third is likely to push for Abadi to join its in the race with 42 seats. favoured fold. After all, Abadi did London Another major Shia player that make a one-day alliance with Amiri. could join such a coalition – but not Even if a Sadr-Abadi coalition that he coalition backed by in- replace Abadi’s list — is the National includes Sunni and Kurdish lists is fluential Shia cleric Muqta- Wisdom Movement, which secured able to form a government, the na- da al-Sadr has secured the 19 seats. tionalist cleric would not necessar- T largest number of parlia- Sadr has already ruled out join- ily be able to select, let alone direct, mentary seats following Iraq’s elec- ing forces with the two Shia-led the new prime minister. tions but he faces a number of seri- lists that are staunchly backed by Marching Towards Reform is led ous challenges before he can shape Iran: the Conquest Coalition, led by by Hassan al-Aqouli, a doctor who the country’s next government.
    [Show full text]
  • Aid to the Palestinians
    U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians Updated December 12, 2018 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RS22967 SUMMARY RS22967 U.S. Foreign Aid to the Palestinians December 12, 2018 In calendar year 2018, the Trump Administration has significantly cut funding for the Palestinians during a time of tension in U.S.-Palestinian relations. Statements by Jim Zanotti President Trump suggest that the Administration may seek via these cuts to persuade the Specialist in Middle Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) to participate in U.S.-led diplomacy on the Eastern Affairs Israeli-Palestinian peace process. Despite the funding cuts, PLO Chairman and Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas and other PLO/PA officials have not reversed their decision to break off diplomatic contacts with the United States, which came after President Trump’s December 2017 recognition of Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. Various observers are debating what the Administration wants to accomplish via the U.S. funding cuts, and how compatible its actions are with U.S. interests. Some Members of Congress have objected to the cuts, including on the grounds that they could negatively affect a number of humanitarian outcomes, especially in Hamas-controlled Gaza. Some current and former Israeli security officials have reportedly voiced concerns about the effects of drastic U.S. cuts on regional stability. Until this year, the U.S. government had consistently supported economic assistance to the Palestinians and humanitarian contributions to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), even if funding in some cases was reduced or delayed.
    [Show full text]