1 04-03-2018 a Benghazi Murder & RICO "Probable Cause" Editorial
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
04-03-2018 A Benghazi Murder & RICO "Probable Cause" Editorial Allegation Against Obama and the Clintons' Retired Police Detective writes a probable cause Writ of RICO and Murder allegations against Barack Obama, William Jefferson Clinton and Hillary Clinton committed as Government Employees. He sites names, places, and acts that could support a motion for a Grand Jury Investigation . We at Alpha News|Codefore Publishing have been following the Clinton’s activities for several years. We have been posting about them on this blog for several years and posted and continue to post constantly on social media. We sort of gave up on the possibility that an investigation into, what we believe to be, the Clinton’s criminal ‘enterprise’ , as described in the Federal Racketeering Statute known as RICO, would ever be realized. Until now that is. http://codeforeblog.com/gray-money-slick-willy-clinton-got-name/ http://codeforeblog.com/john-podesta-how-to-wash-millions-get-hillary-clinton-elected-and-get-away-with-it/ http://codeforeblog.com/the-clinton-family-foundation-money-laundering-history-philosophy/ http://codeforeblog.com/obama-and-clinton-pay-their-debt-to-citibank-gun-control/ It’s one thing to say that the Clintons’ have committed crimes and should be put in prison but are these the words of someone who is ignorant of the law and really doesn’t know if the accusations are substantiated or not, or can the allegations be backed up with Probable Cause”? If you have viewed the video or read the book ‘Clinton Cash’ you will see that this Codefore writing, although independently investigated by Codefore, follows a similar path as the book and Video, but ‘Clinton Cash’ doesn’t get into some of the details that we have published ,doesn’t involve Barrack Obama and falls short of calling for the arrest of the Clinton’s... The contents of this document, on the other hand should be sufficient to ask for a Grand Jury Investigation and, when appropriate, immediate arrest because the intent is to establish ‘probable cause’. We now believe that things have changed. Up until Trump was elected, the Clintons’ controlled who gets investigated, who gets prosecuted and who goes to jail, via their network of political hacks and political appointments and if you have not been paying attention, it has not been the Clintons’ who went to jail.. But even if there is a Grand Jury or special prosecutor investigating them it will not be an easy path. We know, from years of looking into the Clinton activities, that there just has never been any hard evidence, and most, if not all, crucial witnesses against them are dead. This document does not get into the Hillary Clinton email quandary except that a few of the emails provided evidence of collusion and corruption surrounding Benghazi. In the real world of criminal law, hard evidence is not necessary for a prosecution and guilty verdict. There is circumstantial evidence also and although it’s not the preferred way to get a guilty verdict, a guilty verdict has been attained with overwhelming circumstantial evidence.. What we came up with when looking into the crimes relevant to the Clintons alleged crimes was circumstantial evidence. Hillary and Bill Clinton are both attorneys and they know how to isolate themselves from a direct connection to criminal activity. This type of behavior is exactly why the Federal RICO Statute was created. To make it simple to understand circumstantial evidence, If you see rabbit tracks leading to his hole, the tracks are circumstantial evidence that a rabbit went into his hole. If there is a video of him going into the hole, that is hard evidence that he went into the hole. This is the situation with the Clintons. Their crimes are simple thug, mafia type crimes and their motivations are all about stealing money. Their method of operation is to steal money, funnel it to one or more entities and then take possession of the money in a way that no-one can prove exactly where the money originated from or sometimes exactly where it went.. We all know the money trail leads directly to them. We all know that the disappearance of the money also leads to them but we just can’t definitively prove they have or took the money. It’s also likely that other crimes, such as the murder or death of witnesses is an apple from the same tree. From time to time the Clintons’ have made mistakes and soon after the mistake is uncovered, there is frequently a death. 1 At some point in time the Clintons’ realized that if, as Governor, they could steal 60 million dollars from the citizens of Arkansas, imagine what they could do as President of the United States. Their analogy was correct. But they also realized that they had to create the aurora of honesty, integrity, and character if they were to succeed. And to this day they continue to perform their masquerade. They know that their house of cards could crumble if just one card failed. Prior to Hillary Clinton’s the loss of the 2016 Presidential election, The Clinton’s and Obama’s covert illegal activities were becoming less covert, and began to be performed with openness and immunity. They were confident that Hillary would win her second bid for President and their escapades became lax and easier to see. They (HC-POTUS & deep state) also seemed confident that they were untouchable. As mentioned, a guilty verdict in a criminal court of law doesn’t require hard evidence but to arrest and prosecute a suspect, the courts require something called ‘probable cause.’ Without ‘PC’ there cannot be an arrest. And there should not be a prosecution. What is ‘probable cause’? ‘Probable cause to arrest, search, or seize property exists when facts and circumstances known to the police would lead a reasonable person to believe: that the person to be arrested has committed a crime; ... that property to be seized is contraband, stolen, or constitutes evidence of a crime..’ This is the standard that Judges in the United States use to determine whether or not an arrest warrant or search warrant will be issued. The difficult subjective issue the Judges must decide is, “what would a reasonable person think?” What exactly does ‘reasonable’ mean? a: being in accordance with reason a reasonable theory b : not extreme or excessive reasonable requests c : moderate, fair a reasonable chance a reasonable price d : inexpensive e : having the faculty of reason f : possessing sound judgment a reasonable man Webster’s Dictionary As you can see, ‘reasonable’ is subjective and open to opinion. Without going all the way back to the Clinton Arkansas days, where it appears they first began committing crimes we will only demonstrate an allegation of probable cause that the Clinton’s are and have been committing crimes against the United States and against private citizens by violating the RICO Act beginning with Bill Clinton in the white house and culminating with the murder of John Christopher Stevens and three other US Citizens in Benghazi. When establishing establishing ‘probable cause’ its sometimes necessary to demonstrate a pattern of criminal behavior. We begin with their activities in the Congo and culminate with Haiti. But the Benghazi incident is the main incident. Why the Benghazi incident? Because it’s probably the most difficult to prove of all of their crimes and its one of the most recent and also implicates former President Barrack Obama. Most important is that the murder of Christopher Stevens and others in Benghazi implicates both Hillary Clinton and Barrack Obama. There are however unanswered questions that could only be discovered by a Grand Jury. Please realize that at this time Bill Clinton’s direct culpability in the Benghazi incident is questionable but he is certainly involved in the other criminal activities and rest assured if you agree that there is enough ‘probable cause’ when you have completed reading this document, then you must also agree that William Jefferson Clinton as a culpable person would not be excluded from the allegations. Grand Juries have no investigative restrictions. BACKGROUND We shall begin with the background of the Clintons methods to commit crimes that resulted in massive amounts of US Dollars ending up in their possession. Background is important when establishing probable cause. A background description can illustrate patterns of behavior. It’s the same as habits verses isolated behavior. Why is this important? Isolated one time incidents can be explained as an accident, or mistake. In the case of an accident or mistake there is no 2 intent to commit a crime. Conversely repeated similar behavior can be considered as deliberate and even planned. Similar repeated behavior indicates intent and is, in many cases, a required element of a crime. So in some cases the law says that if you commit a crime you must have intended to commit the crime or you must have planned to commit the crime. If you did not intend to commit the crime, it is presumed to be a mistake or an accident. In most cases it’s not against the law to make a mistake. In order to describe relative criminal behavior, one must refer to a relative crime. In this case we refer to the Federal Crime of MURDER and the Federal Crime of RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS (RICO) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In the year 1993 William Clinton became President and served until the year 2001. During his tenure the US Congress impeached him for lying during a Congressional Hearing. Despite this he was re-elected for a second term.