DOCSLIB.ORG

Vulnerable Populations' Perspectives on Climate Engineering

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vulnerable Populations' Perspectives on Climate Engineering University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2015 Vulnerable Populations' Perspectives on Climate Engineering Wylie Allen Carr Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Carr, Wylie Allen, "Vulnerable Populations' Perspectives on Climate Engineering" (2015). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10864. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10864 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VULNERABLE POPULATIONS’ PERSPECTIVES ON CLIMATE ENGINEERING By WYLIE ALLEN CARR B.A. in Religious Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, 2006 M.S. in Resource Conservation, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, 2010 Dissertation presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Forest and Conservation Sciences The University of Montana Missoula, MT December 2015 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Dr. Laurie A. Yung, Chair Department of Society and Conservation Dr. Michael E. Patterson College of Forestry and Conservation Dr. Jill M. Belsky Department of Society and Conservation Dr. Christopher J. Preston Department of Philosophy Dr. Jason J. Blackstock Department of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Public Policy University College London © COPYRIGHT by Wylie Allen Carr 2015 All Rights Reserved ii Abstract Carr, Wylie A., Ph.D., December 2015 Forest and Conservation Sciences Vulnerable Populations’ Perspectives on Climate Engineering Chairperson: Dr. Laurie A. Yung Over the past decade, climate engineering—or the intentional, large-scale manipulation of the global environment to reduce or reverse anthropogenic climate change—has garnered increasing attention from scientists and policymakers. However, impacts from climate engineering will be unevenly distributed. Vulnerable populations already being disproportionately impacted by climate change might benefit or be made worse off. As such, legislators, members of the public, and academics alike have asserted that vulnerable populations deserve to have a say in the research and development of climate engineering technologies and the policies that will govern them. These calls have gone largely unfulfilled. The research presented in this dissertation was designed to help fill that gap. This project set out to answer two main research questions: First, how do vulnerable populations think climate engineering could affect them? And second, how could such populations be more effectively involved in future research and governance efforts? Drawing on 89 in-depth interviews with Solomon Islanders, Kenyans, and Alaska Natives, this dissertation examines perspectives from vulnerable populations on social, political, and ethical issues related to climate engineering. Specific findings are presented in a series of three manuscripts. The First Manuscript focuses on interviewees’ overall perspectives on climate engineering. The majority of interviewees across all three sites indicated they were willing to consider climate engineering. However, this willingness was both reluctant and conditional. The Second Manuscript focuses on ethical aspects of climate engineering and explores interviewee assertions that climate engineering could represent an extension of dominant society control over vulnerable populations. These findings corroborate ethical research suggesting that members of dominant societies need to vigilantly avoid moral corruption and ensure that climate engineering does not further erode the self-determination of vulnerable populations. The Third Manuscript examines interviewee perspectives on different governance frameworks for climate engineering. Quite a few interviewees argued that regional organizations could play a critical role in the governance of climate engineering research. A concluding chapter draws out connections between the three manuscripts, and suggests directions for policy-making and future research. iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank all of the Solomon Islanders, Alaska Natives, and Kenyans who so generously welcomed me into their homes and places of work and took the time the speak with me. I am grateful not only for their willingness to share their thoughts and opinions with me, but also their stories and cultures. I feel incredibly fortunate to have visited the incredible places the participants in this study call home. I relied heavily on research partnerships with a number of people and organizations to pull of this multi-sited effort. This project would not have been possible without considerable help from Chris Filardi, the American Museum of Natural History, and the Solomon Islands Community Conservation Program in the Solomon Islands; the Barrett family, David Pettigrew, Glenn Sheehan, and the Barrow Arctic Science Consortium in Alaska; and Nathaniel Robinson and the Olare Orok & Motorogi Trust in Kenya. I also received a great deal of assistance with the film used in this study from the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in Potsdam, Germany and Gravity Media Productions in Missoula, Montana. Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation (grant number SES 0958095), a Science to Achieve Results Graduate Fellowship from the Environmental Protection Agency, and several scholarships from the College of Forestry and Conservation at the University of Montana. I would like to thank Brian Wynne, Bron Szerszynski, and Clare Waterton with the Sociology Department at Lancaster University for allowing me to study under them as a visiting doctoral student. I would like to thank all of the faculty and staff at the University of Montana who invested their time, energy, and talents in this project through teaching and mentoring, and/or providing logistical and administrative support. I would also like to thank my fellow graduate students who provided friendship, encouragement, and commiseration over the years. I would like to express my gratitude for all of the support, encouragement, and feedback provided by my committee members, Mike Patterson, Jill Belsky, Christopher Preston, and Jason Blackstock. It has been an honor and privilege to work with them, and this project has benefitted immensely from their intellectual contributions. I want to extend a very special thank you to my chair and advisor, Laurie Yung for the incredible amount of time and effort that she put into this research project. I also want to thank her for her mentorship throughout the graduate school process. Finally, I cannot begin to express the depth of gratitude I feel towards my wife Austen and my two beautiful daughters for their support. They have kept me grounded and provided my greatest source of joy and laughter. iv Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1 CLIMATE ENGINEERING: A DEFINITION & BRIEF HISTORY 2 CLIMATE ENGINEERING: PROSPECTIVE TECHNIQUES & POTENTIAL IMPACTS 5 RESEARCH JUSTIFICATION: THE NEED TO INCLUDE VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 13 DISSERTATION OUTLINE 16 CHAPTER 2: METHODS 21 INTRODUCTION 21 STUDY POPULATION 22 STUDY AREAS 27 STUDY PARTICIPANTS 32 DATA COLLECTION 37 DATA ANALYSIS 40 QUOTATION SELECTION 43 STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS 45 CHAPTER 3: RELUCTANT BUT ACCEPTING: AN EXAMINATION OF PERSPECTIVES ON CLIMATE ENGINEERING FROM THE SOUTH PACIFIC, NORTH AMERICAN ARCTIC, AND SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA 61 INTRODUCTION 61 PERSPECTIVES FROM WEALTHY, DEVELOPED NATIONS 65 PERSPECTIVES FROM VULNERABLE POPULATIONS 67 METHODS 69 RESULTS 74 CLIMATE CHANGE 74 PRIOR AWARENESS 76 RELUCTANT ACCEPTANCE 78 NEGATIVE AND UNANTICIPATED IMPACTS 82 CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE 84 CONCLUSION 88 v CHAPTER 4: SKEWED VULNERABILITIES AND MORAL CORRUPTION IN GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES ON CLIMATE ENGINEERING 94 INTRODUCTION 94 SKEWED VULNERABILITIES 97 MORAL CORRUPTION 100 METHODS 102 RESULTS & DISCUSSION 105 SKEWED VULNERABILITIES 106 GEOGRAPHIC VULNERABILITY 110 ECONOMIC VULNERABILITY 112 POLITICAL VULNERABILITY 114 LACK OF INFLUENCE IN TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT 115 WILLINGNESS TO CONSIDER AND MORAL FAILURE 118 CONCLUSION: AVOIDING MORAL CORRUPTION 120 CHAPTER 5: REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS AND CLIMATE ENGINEERING GOVERNANCE 125 INTRODUCTION 125 CAN EXISTING GOVERNANCE STRUCTURES ACCOMMODATE CLIMATE ENGINEERING? 127 HOW INCLUSIVE SHOULD GOVERNANCE BE? 129 REGIONAL GOVERNANCE 133 METHODS 136 RESULTS 139 CONCERNS EMBEDDED IN GOVERNANCE RECOMMENDATIONS 140 PROS AND CONS OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKS 143 A ROLE FOR REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS? 148 DISCUSSION 153 CRITIQUES OF GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORKS 153 WHY REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS? THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS 154 POTENTIAL STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF REGIONAL ORGANIZATIONS 156 CONCLUSION 158 CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSION 160 INTRODUCTION 160 CHAPTER 3: THE PERSPECTIVES MANUSCRIPT 161 CONNECTIONS TO THE OTHER MANUSCRIPTS 164 CHAPTER 4: THE ETHICS MANUSCRIPT 165 CONNECTIONS TO THE OTHER MANUSCRIPTS 167 CHAPTER 5: THE GOVERNANCE MANUSCRIPT 169 vi CONNECTIONS TO THE OTHER MANUSCRIPTS 172 SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES IN PERSPECTIVES ACROSS THE SAMPLE 173 GOVERNANCE AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 184 GOVERNANCE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reforestation in a High-CO2 World—Higher Mitigation Potential Than
    Geophysical Research Letters RESEARCH LETTER Reforestation in a high-CO2 world—Higher mitigation 10.1002/2016GL068824 potential than expected, lower adaptation Key Points: potential than hoped for • We isolate effects of land use changes and fossil-fuel emissions in RCPs 1 1 1 1 •ClimateandCO2 feedbacks strongly Sebastian Sonntag , Julia Pongratz , Christian H. Reick , and Hauke Schmidt affect mitigation potential of reforestation 1Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany • Adaptation to mean temperature changes is still needed, but extremes might be reduced Abstract We assess the potential and possible consequences for the global climate of a strong reforestation scenario for this century. We perform model experiments using the Max Planck Institute Supporting Information: Earth System Model (MPI-ESM), forced by fossil-fuel CO2 emissions according to the high-emission scenario • Supporting Information S1 Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5, but using land use transitions according to RCP4.5, which assumes strong reforestation. Thereby, we isolate the land use change effects of the RCPs from those Correspondence to: of other anthropogenic forcings. We find that by 2100 atmospheric CO2 is reduced by 85 ppm in the S. Sonntag, reforestation model experiment compared to the reference RCP8.5 model experiment. This reduction is [email protected] higher than previous estimates and is due to increased forest cover in combination with climate and CO2 feedbacks. We find that reforestation leads to global annual mean temperatures being lower by 0.27 K in Citation: 2100. We find large annual mean warming reductions in sparsely populated areas, whereas reductions in Sonntag, S., J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Climate Engineering with Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Injections to Reduce Climate Injustice
    Journal of Global Ethics ISSN: 1744-9626 (Print) 1744-9634 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjge20 The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice Toby Svoboda, Peter J. Irvine, Daniel Callies & Masahiro Sugiyama To cite this article: Toby Svoboda, Peter J. Irvine, Daniel Callies & Masahiro Sugiyama (2019): The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice, Journal of Global Ethics, DOI: 10.1080/17449626.2018.1552180 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1552180 Published online: 07 Feb 2019. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjge20 JOURNAL OF GLOBAL ETHICS https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2018.1552180 The potential for climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections to reduce climate injustice Toby Svobodaa, Peter J. Irvineb, Daniel Calliesc and Masahiro Sugiyamad aDepartment of Philosophy, Fairfield University College of Arts and Sciences, Fairfield, USA; bSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA; cChair of International Political Theory, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; dPolicy Alternatives Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Climate engineering with stratospheric sulfate aerosol injections Received 5 February 2018 (SSAI) has the potential to reduce risks of injustice related to Accepted 26 September 2018 anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. Relying on KEYWORDS evidence from modeling studies, this paper makes the case that Climate change; justice; SSAI could have the potential to reduce many of the key physical climate engineering; risk risks of climate change identified by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
    [Show full text]
  • C2G Evidence Brief: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Its Governance
    Carnegie Climate EVIDENCE BRIEF Governance Initiative Carbon Dioxide Removal An initiative of and its Governance 2 March 2021 Summary This briefing summarises the latest evidence relating to Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) techniques and their governance. It describes a range of techniques currently under consideration, exploring their technical readiness, current research, applicable governance frameworks, and other socio-political considerations in section I. It also provides an overview of some generic CDR governance issues and the key instruments relevant for the governance of CDR in section II. About C2G The Carnegie Climate Governance Initiative (C2G) seeks to catalyse the creation of effective governance for climate-altering approaches, in particular for solar radiation modification (SRM) and large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR). In 2018, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) reaffirmed that large-scale CDR is required in all pathways to limit global warming to 1.5°C with limited or no overshoot. Some scientists say SRM may also be needed to avoid that overshoot. C2G is impartial regarding the potential use of specific approaches, but not on the need for their governance - which includes multiple, diverse processes of learning, discussion and decision-making, involving all sectors of society. It is not C2G’s role to influence the outcome of these processes, but to raise awareness of the critical governance questions that underpin CDR and SRM. C2G’s mission will have been achieved once their governance is taken on board by governments and intergovernmental bodies, including awareness raising, knowledge generation, and facilitating collaboration. C2G has prepared several other briefs exploring various CDR and SRM technologies and associated issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning About Climate Change the Pacific Way a Guide for Pacific Teachers Tuvalu Learning About Climate Change the Pacific Way
    Source: Carol Young Source: Source: SPC Learning about climate change the Pacific way A guide for Pacific teachers Tuvalu Learning about climate change the Pacific way A guide for Pacific teachers Tuvalu Compiled by Coping with Climate Change in the Pacific Island Region Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and Secretariat of the Pacific Community Secretariat of the Pacific Community Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) 2015 © Copyright Secretariat of the Pacific Community (SPC) and Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ), 2015 All rights for commercial/for profit reproduction or translation, in any form, reserved. SPC and GIZ authorise the partial reproduction or translation of this material for scientific, educational or research purposes, provided that SPC, GIZ, and the source document are properly acknowledged. Permission to reproduce the document and/or translate in whole, in any form, whether for commercial/for profit or non-profit purposes, must be requested in writing. Original SPC/GIZ artwork may not be altered or separately published without permission. Original text: English Secretariat of the Pacific Community Cataloguing-in-publication data Learning about climate change the Pacific way: a guide for pacific teachers – Tuvalu / compiled by Coping with Climate Change in the Pacific Island Region, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit and the Secretariat of the Pacific Community 1. Climatic changes — Tuvalu. 2. Environment — Management —
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit / Master´S Thesis
    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER´S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master´s Thesis „Climate Migration as Political Ammunition: The Political Use of the Academic Climate Migration Debate by the Greens/European Free Alliance in the European Parliament“ verfasst von / submitted by Luka De Bruyckere angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master (MA) Wien, 2016 / Vienna 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 067 805 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Individuelles Masterstudium: degree programme as it appears on Global Studies – a European Perspective the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Schweitzer MASTERARBEIT / MASTER THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit /Title of the master thesis Climate Migration as Political Ammunition: The Political Use of the Academic Climate Migration Debate by the Greens/European Free Alliance in the European Parliament Verfasser /Author Luka De Bruyckere angestrebter akademischer Grad / acadamic degree aspired Master (MA) Wien, 2016 Studienkennzahl : A 067 805 Studienrichtung: Individuelles Masterstudium: Global Studies – a European Perspective Betreuer/Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Schweitzer Table of contents ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………..………...……4 INTRODUCTION…………………...………………………..……………8 CHAPTER I - The academic climate migration debate…...………..............13 1. Early debate………………………………………………………………...……..13 1.1 Early definitions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ROUGH SEAS AHEAD: NAVIGATING the INEQUALITIES of FUTURE SEA-LEVEL RISE by Robert Dean Hardy (Under the Direction of Marguerite M
    ROUGH SEAS AHEAD: NAVIGATING THE INEQUALITIES OF FUTURE SEA-LEVEL RISE by Robert Dean Hardy (Under the Direction of Marguerite Madden) ABSTRACT With anthropogenic climate change poised to accelerate sea-level rise this century, millions of everyday lives and livelihoods are predicted be unevenly vulnerable to this social- ecological change. In this dissertation, I examine both outcome and contextual vulnerability by applying an integrative approach as my research design framework to navigate the problem of inequalities related to future sea-level rise. To apply mixed methods and plural epistemologies that move from the global to the local scale, I examined the inequalities of sea-level rise via three routes: (1) a global scale, quantitative analysis of country responsibility and risk related to multi- millennial sea-level rise; (2) a regional scale, quantitative analysis of spatiotemporal variation in risk to sea-level rise through the year 2050 for coastal Georgia; and (3) a comparative case study of two barrier island communities off the coast of Georgia, Tybee and Sapelo Islands, to show how race shapes vulnerability to sea-level rise. The are three primary findings for this dissertation: (1) our assessment of future populations’ social vulnerability to sea-level rise inundation indicates that the number of people at risk to sea-level rise on Georgia’s coast is more than double previous estimates that were based on 2010 population data; (2) acknowledgement and acceptance – by the professional community working on sea-level rise – of race as a process of enabling or constraining meaningful engagement, rather than as a mere demographic category, will help mitigate vulnerability for underrepresented communities; and (3) investigating the vulnerability to sea-level rise of a culture and/or place through narrative analysis of its stories and histories is strengthened by modeled projections of sea-level rise inundation and population change.
    [Show full text]
  • Islands Submerged Into the Sea Islands in the Cultural Imaginary of Climate Change by Camilla Asplund Ingemark
    Islands Submerged into the Sea Islands in the Cultural Imaginary of Climate Change By Camilla Asplund Ingemark Islands are a fascinating subject from many points of view; this is one thing Owe Ronström’s persistent enthusiasm for islands and island studies has taught me, as his most junior and recent colleague. They appeal to our (West- ern) imagination as sites of projection for our various desires – and aversions – which becomes especially clear in the context I intend to examine here: discourses on climate change and the peculiar role islands, sinking islands in particular, seem to play in it. I suspect my sudden and fervent interest in this motif in the contemporary cultural imaginary of climate change would not have arisen without Owe’s infuence, and in the following discussion I will especially be drawing on his articulation of the components of “islandness” in Öar och öighet (2016). Thus, I propose to study the recurrent motif of islands being submerged into the sea in texts and narratives on climate change. I am interested in why this image of sinking islands occupies such a prominent place in the con- temporary representation of climate change, and more generally, why it is so compelling to the Western imagination. Drawing on various forms of media content as well as vernacular texts, I attempt to trace the emergence of this motif as one of a handful of iconic images we commonly use to represent and visualize climate change – alongside the polar bear on its dwindling ice foe, melting glaciers etc. – and in the case of the vernacular texts, how this image is employed rhetorically to articulate a specifc stance vis-à-vis climate change.
    [Show full text]
  • Governing Climate Engineering: Scenarios for Analysis
    The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements November 2011 Discussion Paper 11-47 Governing Climate Engineering: Scenarios for Analysis Daniel Bodansky Arizona State University Email: [email protected] Website: www.belfercenter.org/climate Governing Climate Engineering: Scenarios for Analysis Daniel Bodansky Arizona State University Prepared for The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements THE HARVARD PROJECT ON CLIMATE AGREEMENTS The goal of the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements is to help identify and advance scientifically sound, economically rational, and politically pragmatic public policy options for addressing global climate change. Drawing upon leading thinkers in Australia, China, Europe, India, Japan, and the United States, the Project conducts research on policy architecture, key design elements, and institutional dimensions of domestic climate policy and a post-2012 international climate policy regime. The Project is directed by Robert N. Stavins, Albert Pratt Professor of Business and Government, Harvard Kennedy School. For more information, see the Project’s website: http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/climate Acknowledgements The Harvard Project on Climate Agreements is supported by the Harvard University Center for the Environment; the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School; Christopher P. Kaneb (Harvard AB 1990); the James M. and Cathleen D. Stone Foundation; and ClimateWorks Foundation. The Project is very grateful to the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, which provided major support during the period July 2007– December 2010. Citation Information Bodansky, Daniel. “Governing Climate Engineering: Scenarios for Analysis” Discussion Paper 2011-47, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, November 2011. The views expressed in the Harvard Project on Climate Agreements Discussion Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the Harvard Kennedy School or of Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • Has Climate Change Rendered the Concept of Sovereignty Obsolete? Marcus Arcanjo January 2019
    Has Climate Change Rendered the Concept of Sovereignty Obsolete? Marcus Arcanjo January 2019 Introduction Since the 1648 Treaty of Westphalia, state sovereignty has been the driving force underpinning the independence of countries, giving them right to exist via decisions from an organised government without outside intervention. Further, it has traditionally been ‘used to legitimize a strong and undivided power that could secure law and order in times of civil and religious wars’’.1 The 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of states determined that to be recognised as a state in international law, there must be: a permanent population, a defined territory, functioning government, and the ability to engage in relations with other states. Whilst such qualifications are seemingly straightforward, they do not take into account the threat of climate change, which was very much in the background at the time. Currently, a rapidly changing climate is placing island states and atoll nations in particular risk of becoming submerged due to rising sea levels.2 Unless the concept of sovereignty is revised, there will be a growing list of populations that are undefined and undefinable populations under current international law, which could well lead to global crisis and international instability. In this paper I argue that national sovereignty is not obsolete, but rather the concept must be redefined to take into account the effects of a changing climate. The core argument suggests that the discourse should shift away from whether sovereignty is useless and instead focus on the development of an all-encompassing definition for statehood, in order to protect the rights of countries and their citizens in the face of climate change, especially regarding the physical disappearance of their territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Engineering Field Research: the Favorable Setting of International Environmental Law
    Climate Engineering Field Research: The Favorable Setting of International Environmental Law Jesse Reynolds* Abstract As forecasts for climate change and its impacts have become more dire, climate engineering proposals have come under increasing consideration and are presently moving toward field trials. This article examines the relevant international environmental law, distinguishing between climate engineering research and deployment. It also emphasizes the climate change context of these proposals and the enabling function of law. Extant international environmental law generally favors such field tests, in large part because, even though field trials may present uncertain risks to humans and the environment, climate engineering may reduce the greater risks of climate change. Notably, this favorable legal setting is present in those multilateral environmental agreements whose subject matter is closest to climate engineering. This favorable legal setting is also, in part, due to several relevant multilateral environmental agreements that encourage scientific research and technological development, along with the fact that climate engineering research is consistent with principles of international environmental law. Existing international law, however, imposes some procedural duties on States who are responsible for climate engineering field research as well as a handful of particular prohibitions and constraints. Table of Contents I. Introduction ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Buying Time with Climate Engineering? an Analysis of the Buying Time Framing in Favor of Climate Engineering
    Buying Time with Climate Engineering? An analysis of the buying time framing in favor of climate engineering Zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades einer DOKTORIN DER PHILOSOPHIE (Dr. phil.) von der KIT-Fakultät für Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften des Karlsruher Instituts für Technologie (KIT) angenommene DISSERTATION von Frederike Neuber KIT-Dekan: Prof. Dr. Michael Schefczyk 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Gregor Betz 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Armin Grunwald Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 10.04.2018 This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.en Forewor This work is the outcome of three and a half years of research in the *,- priority program SPP 1689 QClimate Engineering P Risks, Challenges, 2pportunities'R as part of the proAect C-E-thics. The main obAectives of ) E thics was to sort, scrutinize and evaluate the main moral arguments about climate engineering. 7hile my colleagues worked, among others, on the trade-off argument, the lesser evil argument, and the argument from political economy, I myself was concerned with the buying time argument P an argument in favor of potential climate engineering deployment. It was a challenging argument in many ways: ,irstly, it was challenging to reconstruct a reasonable version of this argument, that adds to and clarifies the current discussion about a potential buying time deployment of climate engineering. Secondly, it challenged my own point of view about climate engineering. 7hile intuitively, I would headlong reAect any use of climate engineering, analyzing the buying time argument made me concede that there might be forms of deployment that actually could be beneficial and morally sound, albeit in very strict boundary conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • PCC 587, Fundamentals of Climate Change
    PCC 587, Fundamentals of Climate Change DARGAN M. W. FRIERSON DEPARTMENT OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES LAST DAY OF LECTURES!: 12/4/2013 Climate engineering! AKA geoengineering “The intentional, large-scale manipulation of the environment.” [David Keith] “Deliberate, large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system, in order to moderate global warming.’” [Royal Society] Geoengineering History 1974: Mikhail Budyko proposed injecting sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere to cool the earth (like volcanoes) Early 1990s: Edward Teller and collaborators proposed putting designer (nanotech) particles into the stratosphere to deflect sunlight Geoengineering History 1992: The National Academy of Sciences issues a detailed study on geoengineering options, including a cost-benefit analysis for each option 2006: Paul Crutzen (Nobel Prize winner for ozone hole) says we should consider it ¡ The scope and speed of climate changes due to increasing CO2 -- coupled with the lack of any progress on mitigation – requires sulfate aerosol geoengineering solution be seriously considered Two Main Strategies of Geoengineering Taking CO2 out of the atmosphere “Solar radiation management”: blocking out the Sun to cool the Earth back down ¡ This is what most people are talking about when they refer to geoengineering ¡ Various ideas to do this kind of thing (some sound like sci-fi!) Air Scrubbers Chemically remove CO2 by passing air through a scrubber Not operational yet Estimated cost of prototype ~ $160,000 Require millions of these Lackner scrubber scrubbers Ocean greening Generate more Phytoplankton/algae (in phytoplankton by green!) uptake fertilizing ocean with atmospheric CO2 iron--> more CO2 through photosynthesis. uptake by ocean. Organisms die and sink to deep ocean, having fixed the carbon.
    [Show full text]