REDCO PROPERTIES GROUP LIMITED 力高地產集團有限公司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with Limited Liability) (Stock Code: 1622)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REDCO PROPERTIES GROUP LIMITED 力高地產集團有限公司 (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with Limited Liability) (Stock Code: 1622) Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing Limited and The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited take no responsibility for the contents of this announcement, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this announcement. REDCO PROPERTIES GROUP LIMITED 力高地產集團有限公司 (incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited liability) (Stock Code: 1622) DISCLOSEABLE TRANSACTION ACQUISITION OF 35% INTEREST IN MAKATI CITY SUBWAY, INC. ACQUISITION OF 35% INTEREST IN MAKATI CITY SUBWAY, INC. — THE SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT On 18 February 2020, the Subscriber, a subsidiary of the Company, Infradev and MCSI entered into the Share Purchase Agreement pursuant to which: (i) Infradev conditionally agreed to assign, transfer and convey the Assignment Shares to the Subscriber (or its designee) and the Subscriber (or its designee) conditionally agreed to accept such assignment in the consideration of US$30,000,000; and (ii) the Subscriber conditionally agreed to subscribe for, and MCSI conditionally agreed to allot and issue, the Subscription Shares at the Subscription Price of US$72,000,000. Following the Assignment and the Subscription, the Subscriber will hold 35% of the issued share capital of MCSI as enlarged by the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares (assuming that there will be no change in the share capital of MCSI from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement to the Effective Date save for the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares). −1− Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, the Subscriber agreed to be part of the Consortium that will undertake the Project. On the same date of the entering of the Share Purchase Agreement, the Subscriber, ABG and MCSI entered into the Development Agreement pursuant to which the Subscriber and ABG agreed, among other things, through MRTD, to be jointly responsible for the development and construction of the TOD of the Required Land (except for the 15-Hectare Acquired Land which will be developed by MCSI). In addition, for the purpose of the development of the Project, the Subscriber and ABG agreed to establish MRTD in the Philippines, which, upon its establishment, will assume all rights and obligations of the Subscriber and ABG as developer as contemplated under the Development Agreement. LISTING RULES IMPLICATIONS As one or more of the applicable percentage ratios under Rule 14.07 of the Listing Rules in respect of the Assignment and the Subscription are more than 5% but all of them are less than 25%, the Assignment and the Subscription constitute a discloseable transaction for the Company under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules and is subject to reporting and announcement requirements under the Listing Rules, and is exempted from circular and shareholders’ approval requirements under Chapter 14 of the Listing Rules. ACQUISITION OF 35% INTEREST IN MAKATI CITY SUBWAY, INC. — THE SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT On 18 February 2020, the Subscriber, a subsidiary of the Company, Infradev and MCSI entered into the Share Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which: (i) Infradev conditionally agreed to assign, transfer and convey the Assignment Shares to the Subscriber (or its designee) and the Subscriber (or its designee) conditionally agreed to accept such assignment in the consideration of US$30,000,000; and (ii) the Subscriber conditionally agreed to subscribe for, and MCSI conditionally agreed to allot and issue, the Subscription Shares at the Subscription Price of US$72,000,000. Following the Assignment and the Subscription, the Subscriber will hold 35% of the issued share capital of MCSI as enlarged by the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares (assuming that there will be no change in the share capital of MCSI from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement to the Effective Date save for the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares). The Share Purchase Agreement shall only become effective on the Effective Date. −2− The Share Purchase Agreement Date 18 February 2020 Parties (i) MCSI, as issuer; (ii) Infradev as assignor; and (iii) the Subscriber as subscriber and assignee. To the best of the knowledge, information and belief of the Directors having made all reasonable enquiries, MCSI, Infradev and their respective ultimate beneficial owner are all independent third parties and are not connected with the Group. Subject Matter Pursuant to the Share Purchase Agreement, on the Effective Date (i) Infradev shall assign, transfer and convey the Assignment Shares to the Subscriber (or its designee) and the Subscriber (or its designee) shall accept such assignment in the consideration of US$30,000,000; and (ii) the Subscriber shall subscribe for, and MCSI shall allot and issue, the Subscription Shares at the Subscription Price of US$72,000,000. The Assignment Shares, being 15,000,000 unpaid up common shares of MCSI held by Infradev, represent approximately 10.29% of the issued share capital of MCSI as enlarged by the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares (assuming that there will be no change in the share capital of MCSI from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement to the Effective Date save for the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares). The Subscription Shares, being 36,000,000 primary common shares of MCSI, represent approximately 24.71% of the issued share capital of MCSI as enlarged by the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares (assuming that there will be no change in the share capital of MCSI from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement to the Effective Date save for the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares). The Subscription Shares, together with the Assignment Shares, represent 35% of the issued share capital of MCSI as enlarged by the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares (assuming that there will be no change in the share capital of MCSI from the date of the Share Purchase Agreement to the Effective Date save for the allotment and issue of the Subscription Shares). −3− Consideration of the Assignment Subject to the Share Purchase Agreement becoming effective, the consideration of the Assignment is US$30,000,000, which shall be paid (or caused to be paid) by the Subscriber to MCSI for the account of Infradev within 10 Business Days of the Effective Date. The consideration of the Assignment represents Infradev’s unpaid subscription payment for the Assignment Shares. Accordingly, after arm’s length negotiations between the Subscriber and Infradev and taking into account of (i) the unaudited net asset value of MCSI in the amount of approximately PHP2,500,000,000 (equivalent to approximately HK$370,000,000) as at 31 December 2019; (ii) the business prospect of MCSI; and (iii) the reasons for the acquisition of the Assignment Shares as mentioned in the paragraph headed “REASONS FOR AND BENEFITS OF THE TRANSACTIONS” in this announcement, the Directors are of the view that the consideration for the Assignment and the terms and conditions relating to the Assignment under the Share Purchase Agreement are fair and reasonable and in the interest of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole. Subscription Price Subject to the Share Purchase Agreement becoming effective, the Subscription Price for the Subscription Shares is US$72,000,000 and is payable by the Subscriber in cash in the following manner: (a) US$30,000,000 within 15 Business Days after fulfilment (or waiver) of all the conditions (other than condition (iii)) as set out in the paragraph headed “Conditions Precedent to payment of the First Payment and the Second Payment” below (the “First Payment”); and (b) US$42,000,000 within 15 Business Days after fulfilment (or waiver) of condition (iii) as set out in the paragraph headed “Conditions Precedent to payment of the First Payment and the Second Payment” below (the “Second Payment”). The Subscription Price for the Subscription Shares was determined after arm’s length negotiations between the Subscriber and MCSI taking into account, among other things: (i) the unaudited net asset value of MCSI in the amount of approximately PHP2,500,000,000 (equivalent to approximately HK$370,000,000) as at 31 December 2019; −4− (ii) the business prospect of MCSI; and (iii) the reasons for the Subscription of the Subscription Shares as mentioned in the paragraph headed “REASONS FOR AND BENEFITS OF THE TRANSACTIONS” in this announcement. In light of the above, the Directors are of the view that the Subscription Price and the terms and conditions relating to the Subscription under the Share Purchase Agreement are fair and reasonable and in the interest of the Company and the Shareholders as a whole. Conditions Precedent to payment of the First Payment and the Second Payment Subject to the Share Purchase Agreement becoming effective, the payment of the First Payment is conditional upon satisfaction (or waiver by the Subscriber, if applicable) of each of the following conditions (other than condition (iii)), and the payment of the Second Payment is conditional upon satisfaction (or waiver by the Subscriber, if applicable) of condition (iii), in each case, on or before 31 December 2020 (the “Long Stop Date”): (i) the representations and warranties made by MCSI in the Share Purchase Agreement remaining true and correct; (ii) the BIR having issued the certificate authorizing registration that is required for registration of two (2) pieces of lands in the Makati Properties under the name of MCSI; (iii) infradev having
Recommended publications
  • The Arithmetic Behind and Beyond the Proposed Manila Subway
    The Arithmetic Behind and Beyond the Proposed Manila Subway by Manny Gonzalez Though my present occupation is that of an innkeeper in Cebu, in a past incarnation I was an investment officer at World Bank-IFC on the Latin American desk. My specialty was running the numbers on private-sector projects, from small ones like a US$ 200 thousand sugar-mill rehabilitation in Haiti, to larger ones like a US$ 1 Billion copper mine expansion in Mexico. “Running the numbers” includes: determining that the cost estimates are reasonable and comprehensive; forecasting the financial and economic returns, and evaluating whether a project has an appropriate scope and economy of scale In all investment analysis, a healthy scepticism is useful. On one occasion I was assigned to recommend ways to improve profitability in an investment company headquartered in Midtown Manhattan, supposedly worth US$ 1 Billion. It was owned by the world’s then top companies in banking and industry (Citibank, GE, Morgan, IBM, Deutsche, etc. – and that was the problem: with so many illustrious parents, no one felt responsible for watching its numbers). After visiting most of its branches around Latin America and evaluating its asset portfolio, I realized it wasn’t even worth US$100 Million. I recommended shutting it down. Suddenly, a lot of big-name banks and companies were telling me my numbers must be wrong. But they weren’t. The company was liquidated. The proposed 36-km Manila Subway Phase One also has many illustrious parents or backers in both government and industry. And, as with the case described above, no one has looked closely at the numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Privacy Statement
    Privacy Statement LAST REVISED: June 27, 2017 THE SUBWAY® GROUP PRIVACY STATEMENT http://www.subway.com/en-AU Australia Table of Contents 1. SCOPE 2. EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework 3. U.S.-Swiss Safe Harbor Framework 4. KEY DEFINITIONS 5. NOTICE – WHAT PERSONAL INFORMATION DO WE COLLECT AND WHERE DO WE KEEP IT? 6. Prospective Employees 7. Consumers 8. Franchisees, Prospective Franchisees and Development Agents 9. All Internet Users - Cookies, Web Beacons, Internet Protocol (IP) Address, Aggregate Information 10. NOTICE – WHAT DO WE DO WITH THE PERSONAL INFORMATION WE COLLECT? 11. CHOICE 12. Compliance with the Digital Advertising Alliance and “Do Not Track” 13. Mobile Collection 14. Consent to Mobile and Electronic Communication 15. Where We Store Your Personal Information 16. ACCESS 17. DATA INTEGRITY – INFORMATION PURPOSE LIMITATION 18. ONWARD SHARING 19. SECURITY 20. REDRESS / COMPLIANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY 21. OTHER RIGHTS AND INFORMATION 22. Information Regarding Children 23. Links to Third-Party Websites 24. Changes to the Privacy Statement 25. Other Relevant Policies 1. SCOPE Your privacy is very important to the SUBWAY® Group (“we” or “us”) which is made up of the following affiliated entities: 1. Franchise World Headquarters, LLC (“FWH”) provides core business related services to SUBWAY® franchising entities, as well as, other affiliated entities to support the SUBWAY® brand. 2. Subway IP, Inc. (“SIP”), the owner of a proprietary system for establishing and operating restaurants featuring sandwiches, pizza and salads under our trade name and service mark SUBWAY® (the “System”) in order to develop SUBWAY® restaurants worldwide. 3. FWH Technologies, LLC (“FWHT”), the owner and licensor of the SubwayPOS™ software, which has been approved for use in SUBWAY® restaurants worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The #1Global Franchising Opportunity*
    The #1Global Franchising Opportunity* SUBWAY® FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE Pays de Loire, Bretagne Puerto Vallarta, Mexico Athens, Greece SUBWAY® FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE Lahore, Pakistan Orlando, Florida Panama Shopping Center SUBWAY® KOSHER FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE SUBWAY® FRANCHISE Los Angeles, California Houston, Texas Medical Center Shanghai Ramada Greetings, Here at SUBWAY® world headquarters, we strive to provide our franchise owners with the tools and knowledge to run a terrific local business, while selling products that they can be proud of. We also encourage our franchise owners to learn the skills that will allow them to expand and own several SUBWAY® locations. What gives us our edge in the sandwich category? ✔ Great food - our varied menu provides customers with many tasty options ✔ Simplicity - we have an easy-to-run operation ✔ Support - we have systems in place to assist our franchisees ✔ Control - we teach owners to use special cost control methods to help them run their business efficiently Because of these attributes, SUBWAY® franchisees opened more than 17,000 new locations in the past 10 years. We have a strong and growing brand that offers consumers a healthier alternative. What makes our sandwiches so good? ✔ Bread - we bake bread on premises in most stores all day long ✔ Great tastes - our seasoned breads and select sauces are delicious ✔ Made to order - each sandwich is made to order in front of the customer We also take great pride in our people, especially our growing team of franchise owners. Here’s what our franchisees love most about the SUBWAY® franchise system: ✔The quality of our product ✔ Location flexibility ✔ Low investment to build a store ✔ Training and operational support We work very closely with our franchisees.
    [Show full text]
  • (Region Iii & R Mega Manila Subway Project
    JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY (JICA) NATIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (NEDA) ROADMAP FOR TRANSPORT INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FOR METRO MANILA AND ITS SURROUNDING AREAS (REGION III & REGION IV-A) FINAL REPORT SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT NO. 2 MEGA MANILA SUBWAY PROJECT March 2014 ALMEC CORPORATION The rate used in the report is USD1.0= Php 40 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2. PROJECT CONCEPT ..................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Overall Urban Rail Network ................................................................................................2 2.2 Expected Role of the Project ..............................................................................................7 3. Preliminary Demand Forecast .................................................................................... 10 3.1 Methodology .....................................................................................................................10 3.2 Estimated Ridership ..........................................................................................................17 4. PRELIMINARY SYSTEM DESIGN ................................................................................ 25 4.1 Routes and Alignments .....................................................................................................25 4.2 Related Subsystems and Facilities...................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study Hong Kong MTR
    Public Health Impacts From Subway Noise: Case Study Hong Kong MTR The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Xu, Stephany. 2019. Public Health Impacts From Subway Noise: Case Study Hong Kong MTR. Master's thesis, Harvard Extension School. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37364574 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use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
    [Show full text]
  • View Profile
    Canada and including plateau-like highlands with thousands of lakes and rivers. Almost a quarter of the world’s fresh water is concentrated here. The second region is the Appalachian Mountains to the east, which cover Newfoundland, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and part of Québec. The mountains have been eroded by glaciers, wind and water over 300 million years; their highest elevation, in Gaspe’s Shickshock Mountains, is under 1,300 metres. The third region is the Great Lakes-St Lawrence Lowlands in the south-east, stretching from Québec City to Lake Huron. It is the country’s most productive agricultural area. The fertile Interior Plains or prairies, the fourth region, are a vast expanse of land and sky, rising gently from Manitoba to Alberta and spreading northward through the Mackenzie River valley to the Arctic Ocean. The Western Cordillera, the fifth region, is a rocky spine of mountains along the Pacific coastline. The Cordillera stretches from South America to Alaska, and the Canadian portion Canada is a federation of ten provinces and includes many peaks over 3,000 metres, the KEY FACTS three territories. The provinces (and provincial highest being in the Rocky Mountains. Joined Commonwealth: 1931 (Statute of capitals) are: Alberta (Edmonton), British The Arctic region, finally, consists of hundreds Westminster) Columbia (Victoria), Manitoba (Winnipeg), of islands, covering an area of 2,800 km by Population: 35,182,000 (2013) New Brunswick (Fredericton), Newfoundland 1,800 km and reaching to Canada’s northern GDP p.c. growth: 1.3% p.a. 1990–2013 and Labrador (St John’s), Nova Scotia tip.
    [Show full text]
  • Subway Spaces As Public Places: Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T
    Subway Spaces as Public Places: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T OF TEC HNO10LOGY by JUN 3 0 2011 Holly Bellocchio Durso Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning ARCHIVES in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Science in Planning and Master in City Planning at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2011 @2011 Holly Bellocchio Durso. All Rights Reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT the permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of the thesis document in whole or in part. Author C Department of Urban Studies and Planning May 19, 2011 Certified by Associate Professor Annette M. Kim Department of Urban Studies and Planning Thesis Supervisor Accepted by Professor Joseph Ferreira Chair, MCP Committee r Department of Urban Studies and Planning Subway Spaces as Public Places: Politics and Perceptions of Boston's T by Holly Bellocchio Durso Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning on May 19, 2011 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Bachelor of Science in Planning and Master in City Planning ABSTRACT Subways play crucial transportation roles in our cities, but they also act as unique public spaces, distinguished by specific design characteristics, governed by powerful state-run institutions, and subject to intense public scrutiny and social debate. This thesis takes the case of the United States' oldest subway system-Boston's T-and explores how and why its spaces and regulations over their appropriate use have changed over time in response to public perceptions, political battles, and broader social forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Cast Iron Subway Entrances Thematic District
    NOMINATION OF HISTORIC DISTRICT PHILADELPHIA REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES PHILADELPHIA HISTORICAL COMMISSION SUBMIT ALL ATTACHED MATERIALS ON PAPER AND IN ELECTRONIC FORM ON CD (MS WORD FORMAT) 1. NAME OF HISTORIC DISTRICT ______________________________________________________________________Cast Iron Subway Entrances Thematic District 2. LOCATION Please attach a map of Philadelphia locating the historic district. Councilmanic District(s):_______________1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 9 3. BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION Please attach a map of the district and a written description of the boundary. 4. DESCRIPTION Please attach a description of built and natural environments in the district. 5. INVENTORY Please attach an inventory of the district with an entry for every property. All street addresses must coincide with official Board of Revision of Taxes addresses. Total number of properties in district:_______________ 52 Count buildings with multiple units as one. Number of properties already on Register/percentage of total:________/________0 0% Number of significant properties/percentage of total:____________/____________21 40% Number of contributing properties/percentage of total:___________/____________31 60% Number of non-contributing properties/percentage of total:_______/____________0 0% 6. SIGNIFICANCE Please attach the Statement of Significance. Period of Significance (from year to year): from _________1928 to _________ 1955 CRITERIA FOR DESIGNATION: The historic district satisfies the following criteria for designation (check all that apply): ✔ (a) Has significant
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Transportation Systems
    DISASTER RESILIENCE FRAMEWORK 75% Draft for San Diego, CA Workshop 11 February 2015 Transportation Systems, Introduction 6. Transportation Systems 6.1. Introduction Transportation systems are critical to our daily lives. People use various systems of transportation on a daily basis to travel to and from work, school, visits to family and friends, attend business meetings, and medical emergency sites. However, the transportation network meets much more than just an individual’s needs. Businesses use trucks, ships, trains, and airplanes to transport goods from their point of production to their point of use or consumption. For example, food is often transported from the producer (e.g., a farm) to a processing and packing plant, then a regional or national distribution center, and finally to the local stores where it can be purchased by consumers. All of these steps in this example of product distribution rely heavily on the transportation system. Traditionally, people think about the transportation system as using roads and bridges to move both goods and people. While roads and bridges are a critical part of the transportation network, communities1 also rely upon other systems of transportation, including: Airports to transport people and goods long distances in a short period of time Passenger and freight rail lines to transport people and goods regionally/nationally Subway lines or light rail corridors in large urban centers (e.g., New York, DC, Chicago, Los Angeles) to transport people to/from work and entertainment/leisure activities Harbors and ports to import/export goods from/to the globally and distribute them on inland waterways Ferry terminals and waterways to transport the workforce to/from work (e.g., San Francisco, New York) Pipelines2 to transport natural gas and petroleum nationally and regionally to utilities and refineries The transportation system is a very complex system with multiple modes each with their own complexities that make coordinating activities to build resilience of the system and the communities they support very challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting the Commonwealth Key Public Transportation Projects and Their Benefits for Massachusetts
    Connecting the Commonwealth Key Public Transportation Projects and Their Benefits for Massachusetts MASSPIRG Education Fund Connecting the Commonwealth Key Public Transportation Projects and Their Benefits for Massachusetts MASSPIRG Education Fund Tony Dutzik Frontier Group Eric Bourassa MASSPIRG Education Fund Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank Fred Salvucci of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Shanna Vale of the Conservation Law Foundation, and Phineas Baxandall of U.S. PIRG for their insightful review of this report. Thanks also to the Center for Neighborhood Tech- nology for the use of their map of household transportation expenditures. Finally, thanks to Susan Rakov and Elizabeth Ridlington of Frontier Group for their editorial support. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. The recommendations are those of MASSPIRG Education Fund. The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of those who provided editorial review. Copyright 2008 MASSPIRG Education Fund With public debate around important issues often dominated by special interests pursuing their own narrow agendas, MASSPIRG Education Fund offers an independent voice that works on behalf of the public interest. MASSPIRG Education Fund, a 501(c)(3) organiza- tion, works to protect consumers and promote good government. We investigate problems, craft solutions, educate the public, and offer Bay Staters meaningful opportunities for civic participation. Frontier Group conducts research and policy analysis to support a cleaner, healthier and more democratic society. Our mission is to inject accurate information and compelling ideas into public policy debates at the local, state and federal levels. For more information about MASSPIRG Education Fund, or for additional copies of this report, please visit www.masspirg.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Environmental Project Report Addendum Scarborough Subway Extension Updated Environmental Project Report – 2020 Addendum
    Metrolinx Updated Environmental Project Report Addendum Scarborough Subway Extension Updated Environmental Project Report – 2020 Addendum Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. 105 Commerce Valley Drive West, 7th Floor Markham, ON L3T 7W3 Canada T: 905.886.7022 F: 905.886.9494 www.aecom.com Date: August 2020 Project #: 60617139 Metrolinx – Environmental Project Report Addendum Scarborough Subway Extension Updated Environmental Project Report – 2020 Addendum Statement of Qualifications and Limitations The attached Report (the “Report”) has been prepared by AECOM Canada Ltd. (“AECOM”) for the benefit of the Client (“Client”) in accordance with the agreement between AECOM and Client, including the scope of work detailed therein (the “Agreement”). The information, data, recommendations and conclusions contained in the Report (collectively, the “Information”): ▪ is subject to the scope, schedule, and other constraints and limitations in the Agreement and the qualifications contained in the Report (the “Limitations”); ▪ represents AECOM’s professional judgement in light of the Limitations and industry standards for the preparation of similar reports; ▪ may be based on information provided to AECOM which has not been independently verified; ▪ has not been updated since the date of issuance of the Report and its accuracy is limited to the time period and circumstances in which it was collected, processed, made or issued; ▪ must be read as a whole and sections thereof should not be read out of such context; ▪ was prepared for the specific purposes described in the Report and the Agreement; and ▪ in the case of subsurface, environmental or geotechnical conditions, may be based on limited testing and on the assumption that such conditions are uniform and not variable either geographically or over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Subways and Road Congestion
    Subways and Road Congestion Yizhen Gu, Chang Jiang, Junfu Zhang and Ben Zou∗ Abstract We study whether subways alleviate road congestion by examining 45 subway line launches in China and using detailed data on road speed. Our difference-in-differences estimation finds that in the first year after a subway line is launched, rush-hour speed on nearby roads in- creases by about 4%. The effect is most prominent in initially-congested roads and declines over distance to the new subway line. Evidence on road speed is corroborated with substitu- tion patterns among modes of transportation. Using auxiliary data from Beijing, we calculate that the time savings for each automobile or bus commute from faster speed is worth 0.1 USD. Keywords: Subway, congestion, public transit JEL Classification: R41, R42, L92 [Accepted for publication at American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.] ∗Gu: Institute for Economic and Social Research, Jinan University; email: [email protected]. Jiang: Maps Open Platform Department, Baidu, Inc.; email: [email protected]. Zhang: Department of Economics, Clark University; email: [email protected]. Zou: Department of Economics, Michigan State University; email: [email protected]. We would like to thank Seema Jayachandran and four anonymous referees for extremely helpful comments. We thank Richard Arnott, Victor Couture, Mark Jacobsen, Ajin Lee, Matt Turner, Cliff Winston, and participants at seminars and conferences at Brookings-Tsinghua Center, Fudan University, Harvard University, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Jinan University, MIT, Michigan State University, University of Chicago, and Singapore Management University for helpful comments. We are grateful to the people at the Baidu Maps Open Platform department, in particular Tianqi Liu and Xiangmin Li, for providing and helping us with the data.
    [Show full text]