Site Meeting 7/29/14 (BMM)

APP 698570 – I-75 North of Kings Hwy to S. of Toledo Blade Widening

FIELD NOTES: Site Meeting 7/29/14 (BMM)

100L – FLUCCS 641

This system is located on the south side of I-75. This wetland historically extended to the north and connected to the wetland on the north side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was

observed. The dominant species within the assessment area are frog fruit (Phyla

nodiflora) and arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia); subdominant vegetation includes dog

fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), carpet grass (Axonopus furcatus), Carolina willow

(Salix caroliniana), Peruvian primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana), and wax myrtle

(Myrica cerifera). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species.

105M – FLUCCS 641 This system is located in the median of I-75. Historically, this wetland was a part of a larger system that continues to the north side of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. Dominant vegetation included Peruvian primrose willow and Carolina willow. Subdominant vegetation included broomsedge bluestem (Andropogon virginicus), arrowhead, grapevine (Vitis sp.), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia), frog fruit, dog fennel, mock bishops weed (Ptilimnium capillaceum), torpedo grass (Panicum repens), a few live oak (Quercus virginiana), and bahia grass (Paspalum notatum). This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species.

110L – FLUCCS 641 This system is located on the south side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and residential development to the south. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is dominated by redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana); subdominant vegetation includes Peruvian primrose willow, camphorweed (Pluchea odorata), and saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species.

123L – FLUCCS 631 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and residential development to the southwest. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is dominated by redroot; subdominant vegetation includes camphorweed and bahia grass. This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species.

135R – FLUCCS 631

This moderate quality wetland is located on the north side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues north and to the south side of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is dominated by bahia grass, Carolina willow, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), and saltbush; subdominant vegetation includes, maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), coinwort (Centella asiatica), Peruvian primrose willow, mock Bishop's weed, soft rush (Juncus effusus), muscadine (Vitis rotundifolia) and a few oak (Quercus sp.). Low levels of nuisance/exotic species were observed during the wetland assessment.

155R – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is on the north side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues north and to the south side of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods, electrical power facilities to the east and residential development to the north. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger marsh that is dominated by maidencane; subdominant vegetation includes saltbush, broomsedge bluestem, dog fennel, and Carolina willow. Nuisance/exotic species were not observed during the wetland assessment.

156L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush and vines is on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues south and to the north side of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and residential development to the south. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger marsh that is dominated by Peruvian primrose willow, a nuisance/exotic species; subdominant vegetation includes maidencane, saltbush, and sand cordgrass (Spartina bakeri) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, wax myrtle, and saltbush. This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species.

198L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush and vines is on the south side of I-75. This wetland historically extended to the north and connected to the wetland on the north side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is comprised of frog fruit, arrowhead, dog fennel, carpet grass, Carolina willow, Peruvian primrose willow, wax myrtle, and saltbush. It appears there has recently been clearing of Brazilian-pepper. This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species.

337 – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a contiguous system that continued to the north of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is a freshwater marsh that is dominated by redroot, arrowhead and Peruvian primrose willow; subdominant vegetation includes sand cordgrass and broomsedge bluestem with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of Peruvian primrose willow.

350L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a contiguous system that continued to the north of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is a freshwater marsh that is dominated by redroot, arrowhead and Peruvian primrose willow; subdominant vegetation includes sand cordgrass and broomsedge bluestem with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of Peruvian primrose willow.

367L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75 and the east side of the recreational fields of Woodland Middle School. Historically this wetland was connected to the wetland northeast of I 75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane, smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides), and Saint John's wort (Hypericum fasciculatum); subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata) and arrowhead with an edge comprised of Carolina willow and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a very low coverage of nuisance exotic species; Peruvian primrose willow, cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass principally near the edge. This wetland exhibits good zonation.

383L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland was connected to the wetland northeast of I-75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush, maidencane, smartweed, and Saint John's wort; subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed and arrowhead with an edge comprised of Carolina willow and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a very low coverage of nuisance exotic species; Peruvian primrose willow, cattail and torpedo grass. This wetland exhibits good zonation.

395L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the southwest side of I-75. Historically, this wetland may have been contiguous with the wetland to the northwest which extends to the north side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and a currently un-cleared residential development to the south. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by arrowhead and coinwort; subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed, red ludwigia (Ludwigia repens), ragweed (Ambrosia sp.), and dog fennel with an edge comprised of Carolina willow. This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of Peruvian primrose willow.

403L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland continued to the north of I-75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 no standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger system that is dominated by maidencane and St. Johns wort; subdominant vegetation includes arrowhead, wax myrtle, broomsedge bluestem, and slash pine (Pinus elliottii) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, saltbush, and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a low coverage of Peruvian primrose willow, a nuisance species.

416M – FLUCCS 641 Wetland 416M is located in the median of I-75. Historically this system was contiguous with wetlands to the north and south of I-75. Surrounding habitat consists primarily of mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forests. Dominant vegetation includes wax myrtle; subdominant species included saltbush, Peruvian primrose willow, cogon grass (Imperata cylindrica), and Brazilian pepper. This wetland contained a moderate coverage of nuisance/exotic species. No standing water was observed during field reviews.

422M – FLUCCS 641 Wetland 422M is located in the median of I-75. Historically this system was contiguous with wetlands to the north and south of I-75. Surrounding habitat consists primarily of mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forests. Dominant vegetation includes Carolina willow; subdominant species included laurel oak, cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, and wax myrtle along the edge and interior with an understory of arrowhead, Peruvian primrose willow, and maidencane. This wetland contained a low coverage of nuisance/exotic species. During field surveys standing no water was observed. 423M – FLUCCS 641 This moderate to low quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I-75. This is an isolated wetland that historically was contiguous with wetlands to the north and south of I-75. Surrounding habitat consists primarily of mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forests. The wetland was dominated by Carolina willow, saltbush, and wax myrtle along the edge and interior with an understory of arrowhead, Peruvian primrose willow, and cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea). This wetland contained a low coverage of nuisance/exotic species. During field surveys no standing water was observed.

430M – FLUCCS 641 This moderate to low quality isolated freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I-75. Surrounding habitat consists primarily of mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forest, north and south of I-75 are other wetland systems and pine flatwoods. This wetland was dominated by Carolina willow with an understory of arrowhead, dog fennel, broomsedge bluestem, swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum), grapevine, and beaksedge (Rhynchospora sp.). Nuisance/exotic species were not observed during the wetland evaluation and no standing water was observed.

437L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh is located on the south side of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues south and to the north side of I- 75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. During field surveys in April 2013 standing water was observed. The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush, maidencane, and smartweed; subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed, St. Johns wort, buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis) and arrowhead with an edge comprised of Carolina willow and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species; Peruvian primrose willow, cattail and torpedo grass.

450M – FLUCCS 641 This moderate to low quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues on the north and south sides of I-75 and is currently connected through a culvert. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median and other remnant wetlands, north and south of I-75 are other wetland systems and pine flatwoods. This wetland is dominated by Peruvian primrose willow, Carolina willow and wax myrtle. Subdominant species included arrowhead, frog fruit, dog fennel, broomsedge bluestem, beggarticks (Bidens alba), saltbush, cabbage palm, and red maple (Acer rubrum). No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species. 455M – FLUCCS 641 This moderate to low quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues on the north and south sides of I-75 and is currently connected through a culvert. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median and other remnant wetlands, north and south of I-75 are other wetland systems and pine flatwoods. This wetland was dominated by Peruvian primrose willow, Carolina willow and wax myrtle. Subdominant species included arrowhead, frog fruit, dog fennel, broomsedge bluestem, beggarticks, saltbush, cabbage palm, and red maple. No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. This wetland contains a moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species.

470L – FLUCCS 641 This moderate quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush and vines abuts I-75 to the north. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues south and to the north of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. The assessment area is part of a larger marsh that is dominated by maidencane, Carolina willow, wax myrtle, sand cordgrass, and softrush; subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed, pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata), slash pine, dog fennel and arrowhead with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, wax myrtle, and saltbush. This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species; Peruvian primrose willow and cattail.

PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 105M Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

Scoring Guidance Optimal (10) Moderate(7) Minimal (4) Not Present (0) The scoring of each Condition is less than Condition is optimal and indicator is based on optimal, but sufficient to Minimal level of support of Condition is insufficient to fully supports what would be suitable maintain most wetland/surface water provide wetland/surface wetland/surface water for the type of wetland or wetland/surface functions water functions functions surface water assessed waterfunctions

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate to low quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush and vines is located in the median of I-75. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues to the northside of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median, beyond I-75 is residential development. w/o pres or current with 3 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation; however, several hydrologic indicators were noted including stainlines and adventitious rooting. Hydrology of the wetland is normal. Water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is dominated by primrose willow (Ludwigia peruvianna ), a nuisance/exotic species, and Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ); subdominant vegetation includes broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus ), 1. Vegetation and/or arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ), grapevine (Vitis sp.), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia ), frog fruit (Phyla 2. Benthic Community nodiflora ), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium ), mock bishops weed (Ptilimnium capillaceum ), torpedo grass (Panicum repens ), live oak (Quercus virginiana ), and bahia grass (Paspalum notatum ). This wetland contains a w/o pres or moderate coverage of nuisance exotic species. current with 50

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.074 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.433 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.433 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL123L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh abuts I-75 to the northeast. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods heavily dominated by Brazilian pepper and a largely undeveloped residential community to the southwest. w/o pres or current with 4 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrology of the wetland is minimally disturbed. Additionally, water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

1. Vegetation and/or The assessment area is dominated by redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana ); subdominant vegetation includes 2. Benthic Community camphorweed (Pluchea odorata ), and bahia grass (Paspalum notatum ). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species and adjacent areas dominated by Brazilian pepper. w/o pres or current with 40

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.104 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.433 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.433 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL198L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh abuts I-75 to the northeast and Veterans Boulevard to the southwest. This wetland historically extended to the north and connected to the wetland on the north side of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and roadways. w/o pres or current with 4 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrology of the wetland is minimally disturbed as evidenced by the recruitment of wax myrtle into the interior of the wetland. Additionally, water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is is comprised of frog fruit (Phyla nodiflora ), arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ), dog fennel 1. Vegetation and/or (Eupatorium capillifolium) , carpet grass (Axonopus furcatus ), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ), primrose willow 2. Benthic Community (Ludwigia peruviana ), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera ), and saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia ). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species. The wetland is currently impacted due to roadside edge effects. w/o pres or current with 40

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.056 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.433 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.433 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 337 Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of Impact - Fill 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrology of the wetland is normal but there is significant erosion and sediment deposition. Water quality therefore less than optimal due to sedimentation and road runoff. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is part of a larger slough system that extends northeast of the project. The wetland is 1. Vegetation and/or dominated by Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ), cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto ), primrose willow (Ludwigia 2. Benthic Community peruviana ), and laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road that has resulted in recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. w/o pres or current with 50

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.015 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.5 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.5 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality slough extends northeast under I-75 . Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and interstate right-of-way. With project condition: surface water area will be shaded by extended bridge infrastructure. w/o pres or current with 5 3

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrology of the wetland is normal but significant erosion and sediment deposition noted. Water quality less than optimal due to sedimentation and road runoff. With project condition: hydrology is expected to remain the same. w/o pres or current with 5 5

.500(6)(c)Community structure

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.003 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.5 0.37

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.13 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 367L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh abuts I 75 to the northeastern side and the recreational fields of Woodland Middle School to the western side. Historically this wetland was connected to the wetland northeast of I 75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation; however, several hydrologic indicators were noted including muck, stainlines, and adventitious rooting. Hydrology of the wetland is normal. Water quality may be less than optimal due to runoff from the road and from Woodland Middle School. w/o pres or current with 6 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation 1. Vegetation and/or includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 2. Benthic Community lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Paicum repens ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the w/o pres or adjacency to the road that has resulted in some recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.147 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.566 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.566 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

.500(6)(c)Community structure The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 1. Vegetation and/or lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . This 2. Benthic Community wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Paicum repens ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road that has resulted in some recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. In the post-construction w/o pres or condition, the nuisance/exotic species will likely encroach into this neighboring assessment area, thus reducing the current with community structure quality. 86

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.023 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.633 0.566

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.067 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 383L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh abuts I 75 to the northeastern side. Historically this wetland was connected to the wetland northeast of I 75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation 1. Vegetation and/or includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 2. Benthic Community lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Paicum repens ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the w/o pres or adjacency to the road; thist has resulted in some recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.246 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.6 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.6 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation; however, several hydrologic indicators were noted including muck, stainlines, and adventitious rooting. Hydrology of the wetland is normal. Water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. No change in post-construction condition. w/o pres or current with 7 7

.500(6)(c)Community structure The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 1. Vegetation and/or lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . This 2. Benthic Community wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Paicum repens ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road; thist has resulted in some recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. In the post- w/o pres or construction condition, these nuisance/exotic species will likely encroach into this adjacent assessment area, current with reducing the overall community structure quality. 86

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.027 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.666 0.6

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.066 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 403L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality wet prairie abuts I-75 to the north. Historically this wetland continued to the north of I-75 and is now connected through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrologic indicators observed included stain lines and adventitious rooting. Hydrology has been minimally impacted in the past as indicated by the recruitment of slash pine and wax myrtle into the interior of the wetland. Water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 6 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is part of a larger system that is dominated by maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ) and St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasciculatum ); subdominant vegetation includes arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ), wax 1. Vegetation and/or myrtle (Myrica cerifera ), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus ), and slash pine (Pinus elliottii ) with an edge 2. Benthic Community comprised of Carolina willow, saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia ), and wax myrtle. This wetland contains a low coverage of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), a nuisance species. Diturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road that has resulted in shrub species dominating the northern edge and the w/o pres or recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.278 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.6 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.566 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 423L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate to high quality freshwater marsh abutsI-75 to the north. Historically this wetland was part of a contiguous system that continued south and to the north of I-75. The current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 6 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation; however, several hydrologic indicators were noted including muck, algal matting, stainlines, and adventitious rooting. Soils were saturated and hydrology of the wetland is normal. Water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 7 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ) and Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ); subdominant vegetation includes smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ), redroot (Lachnanthes caroliana ), carpet grass (Axonopus furcatus ) and sand cordgrass 1. Vegetation and/or (Spartina bakeri ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia ) and wax 2. Benthic Community myrtle (Myrica cerifera ). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ) and Brazilian pepper. Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency w/o pres or to the road that has resulted in shrub species dominating the northern edge and the recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.050 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.63 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.63 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 423M Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate to low quality isolated freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I- 75. Historically this system was contiguous with the wetlands to the north and south of I-75. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forest, north and south of I-75 are other wetland systems and pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 3 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Hydrology of the wetland is highly influenced by stormwater runoff from I-75 and has likely resulted in poor water quality. w/o pres or current with 3 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is dominated by Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ), saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia ), and 1. Vegetation and/or wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera ) along the edge and interior with an understory of arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ), 2. Benthic Community primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), and cinnamon fern (Osmunda cinnamomea ). Low coverage of nuisance/exotic species were observed. w/o pres or current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.220 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.4 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.4 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 430M Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/19/2013; 7/29/2014 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate to low quality isolated freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush, and vines is located in the median of I- 75. Surrounding habitat is primarily mowed median and hardwood conifer mixed forest, north and south of I-75 are other wetland systems and pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 3 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is dominated by Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) with an understory of arrowhead 1. Vegetation and/or (Sagittaria lancifolia ), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium ), broomsedge (Andropogon virginicus ), swamp fern 2. Benthic Community (Blechnum serrulatum ), grapevine (Vitis sp.), and beaksedge (Rhynchospora sp.). Nuisance/exotic species were not observed during the wetland evaluation. w/o pres or current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.14 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.43 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.43 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 437L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/2014 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh abuts I 75 to the north. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues south and to the northside of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert under the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods and other wetlands. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) Standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation. Several other hydrologic indicators were noted including muck, stainlines, and adventitious rooting. Hydrology of the wetland is normal. Water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 7 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure

The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation 1. Vegetation and/or includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 2. Benthic Community lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Panicum repens ). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the w/o pres or adjacency to the road that has resulted in the recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.38 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.6 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.6 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 437L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: field review with Scheda and B. impact (secondary) 7/29/2014 Meinecke of SWFWMD

.500(6)(c)Community structure The assessment area is part of a larger freshwater marsh that is dominated by spikerush (Eleocharis sp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), and smartweed (Polygonum hydropiperoides ); subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), St. Johns wort (Hypericum fasiculatum ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria 1. Vegetation and/or lancifolia ) with an edge comprised of Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ) and wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera) . In the 2. Benthic Community right-of-way, there is a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruviana ), cattail (Typha sp.) and torpedo grass (Panicum repens ). It is anticipated that these disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road that has resulted in the recruitment of nuisance/exotic w/o pres or vegetation. Therefore, in the post-project condition, it is anticipated that the nuisance/exotic species will recruit into current with this wetland area beyond the right-of-way. 86

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.025 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.67 0.6

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = -0.07 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] PART II – Quantification of Assessment Area (impact or mitigation) (See Sections 62-345.500 and .600, F.A.C.)

Site/Project Name Application Number Assessment Area Name or Number I-75 from Charlotte CL to S. of Toledo Blade WTL 470L Impact or Mitigation Assessment conducted by: Assessment date: TF/CS; field review with B. Meinecke of impact 4/18/2013; 7/29/14 SWFWMD

.500(6)(a) Location and Landscape Support This moderate quality freshwater marsh with shrubs, brush and vines abuts I-75 to the north. Historically this wetland was part of a larger system that continues south and to the northside of I-75; the current connection is through a culvert un the road. Surrounding habitat is primarily pine flatwoods. w/o pres or current with 5 0

.500(6)(b)Water Environment (n/a for uplands) No standing water was observed during the wetland evaluation; however, several hydrologic indicators were noted including stainlines and adventitous rooting. Hydrology of the wetland is minimally disturbed as evidenced by the recruitment of you wax myrtle and slash pine into the interior of the wetland. Additionally, water quality may be less than optimal due to road runoff. w/o pres or current with 6 0

.500(6)(c)Community structure The assessment area is part of a larger marsh that is dominated by maidencane (Panicum hemitomon ), Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana ), wax myrtle (Myrica cerifera ), sand cordgrass (Spartina bakeri ), and softrush (Juncus effusus ); subdominant vegetation includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata ), slash pine (Pinus elliottii ), 1. Vegetation and/or pennywort (Hydrocotyle umbellata ), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium ) and arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia ) 2. Benthic Community with an edge comprised of Carolina willow, wax myrtle, and saltbush (Baccharis halimifolia ). This wetland contains a low coverage of nuisance exotic species consisting of primrose willow (Ludwigia peruvianna ) and cattail (Typha w/o pres or sp.). Disturbances to the wetland are primarily due to the adjacency to the road that has resulted in shrub species dominating the northern edge and the recruitment of nuisance/exotic vegetation. current with 60

Score = sum of above scores/30 (if If preservation as mitigation, For impact assessment areas uplands, divide by 20) Preservation adjustment factor = current FL = delta x acres = -0.56 or w/o pres with Adjusted mitigation delta = 0.57 0

If mitigation For mitigation assessment areas Delta = [with-current] Time lag (t-factor) = RFG = delta/(t-factor x risk) = 0.57 Risk factor =

Form 62-345.900(2), F.A.C. [effective date] Table 3. Wetland and Surface Water UMAM Summary Total UMAM Type Impacts Impact ID Type (NWI) Drainage Basin Project UMAM Score Functional (FLUCFCS) (acres) Type Acreage Loss WTL 100L PEM1 6410 Peace River 0.39 0.36 F 0.50 0.18 WTL 105M PEM1/PSS3 6417 Peace River 0.96 0.17 F 0.43 0.07 WTL 110L PEM1 6410 Peace River 0.11 0.09 F 0.47 0.04 WTL 123L PEM1 6410 Peace River 0.26 0.24 F 0.43 0.10 WTL 135R PSS3 6310 Peace River 0.27 0.25 F 0.57 0.14 WTL 155R PEM1 6410 Peace River 0.37 0.11 F 0.63 0.07 WTL 156L PSS3 6417 Peace River 0.08 0.05 F 0.50 0.03 WTL 198L PSS3 6417 Myakka River 0.35 0.13 F 0.43 0.06 0.03 F 0.50 0.02 WTL 337 PSS3 6180 Myakka River 0.25 0.02 S 0.13 0.00 WTL 350L PEM1 6410 Myakka River 0.47 0.45 F 0.60 0.27 0.58 0.26 F 0.57 0.15 WTL 367L PEM1 6410 Myakka River N/A 0.34 secondary 0.07 0.02 0.68 0.41 F 0.60 0.25 WTL 383L PEM1 6410 Myakka River N/A 0.43 secondary 0.07 0.03 WTL 395L PEM1 6410 Myakka River 0.40 0.38 F 0.40 0.15 WTL 403L PEM1 6410 Myakka River 0.55 0.49 F 0.57 0.28 WTL 416M* PEM1/PSS3 6310 Myakka River 0.13 0.13 F 0.33 0.04 WTL 422M PSS3 6417 Myakka River 5.76 0.77 F 0.43 0.33 WTL 423L PEM1 6410 Myakka River 0.16 0.08 F 0.63 0.05 WTL 423M PEM1/PSS3 6417 Myakka River 3.49 0.55 F 0.40 0.22 WTL 430M PEM1/PSS3 6417 Myakka River 0.32 0.32 F 0.43 0.14 0.71 0.64 F 0.60 0.38 WTL 437L PEM1 6410 Myakka River N/A 0.36 secondary 0.07 0.03 WTL 450M PEM1/PSS3 6417 Myakka River 0.54 0.54 F 0.37 0.20 WTL 455M PEM1/PSS3 6417 Myakka River 1.05 1.05 F 0.37 0.39 WTL 470L PSS3 6417 Myakka River 2.88 0.98 F 0.57 0.56 WTL 480M PEM1 6410 Myakka River 0.38 0.38 F 0.40 0.15 SW 316L PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.06 0.03 F 0.47 0.02 SW 503L PEM1x 5100 Myakka River 0.32 0.16 F 0.47 0.08

Interstate 75 from the Charlotte County Line to south of Toledo Blade Boulevard Sarasota County, Florida FPID No. 413044-2-52-01 Table 3. Wetland and Surface Water UMAM Summary Total UMAM Type Impacts Impact ID Type (NWI) Drainage Basin Project UMAM Score Functional (FLUCFCS) (acres) Type Acreage Loss SW 450L (surface water PEM1x component) 5100 Myakka River 0.29 0.29 F 0.47 0.14 SW 277L PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.04 0.00 F 0.47 0.00 SW 249L PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.05 0.00 F 0.47 0.00 SW 206L PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.11 0.11 F 0.47 0.05 SW 173L PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.06 0.01 F 0.47 0.00 SW 127L PUB2Hx 5120 Peace River 0.03 0.00 F 0.47 0.00 SW 155R PEM1x 5100 Peace River 0.06 0.06 F 0.47 0.03 SW 162L PEM1x 5100 Myakka River 0.36 0.05 S 0.14 0.01 SW 174R PUB2Hx 5120 Peace River 0.05 0.01 F 0.47 0.00 SW 205R PUB2Hx 5120 Myakka River 0.05 0.01 F 0.47 0.00 Totals N/A N/A N/A 22.59 10.73 N/A N/A 4.67 USACE Mitigation N/A N/A N/A N/A 10.73 N/A N/A 4.67

SWFWMD Mitigation N/A N/A N/A N/A 9.87 N/A N/A 4.30 Impact Type (Type): D = dredge; F = fill; H = change hydrology; S = shading; C = clearing; O = other

* Isolated system less than 0.5 acres- does not require mitigation for SWFWMD as per Basis of Review

Interstate 75 from the Charlotte County Line to south of Toledo Blade Boulevard Sarasota County, Florida FPID No. 413044-2-52-01