The Women of Romans 16*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Women of Romans 16* 72 The Women of Romans 16* t the conclusion of his lengthiest and most theologically expansive named without reference to any male relative. In verse 2, Paul urges Aletter, Paul greeted members of the Christian congregations in the Roman Christians to receive Phoebe with honor and to offer her Rome (Rom. 16:3-16). Paul makes it clear that he had never visited help in a worthy manner.1 It is likely that her trip to Rome was what the Roman house-churches (15:22-30), but, due to close networks had enabled Paul to write the letter and be assured of its safe deliv- of association between the early churches, it is evident that Paul was ery. There is good reason to speculate that Phoebe was charged with closely acquainted with many Roman Christians. After commending carrying the letter to the Roman Christians and to read it aloud (as Phoebe to them (16:1-2), he sent greetings to 28 individuals. Of the was the custom of the time), representing Paul to the gatherings of 28 associates on that list, nine of them are women (seven named believers in Rome; thus, her commendation needed to be inscribed and two identified by relationship). in the letter itself. The Greek term that describes Phoebe’s role in the church in Paul’s Female Ministry Partners Cenchrae requires further discussion. The term from which our English term “deacon” is derived is diakonos. Across Paul’s letters, Paul wrote his letter to the Romans with some pragmatic purpos- the term diakonos appears 21 times. The NIV translates this one es in mind: He planned trips to Jerusalem and Spain, and he hoped term in several different ways, most commonly as “servant” (e.g., the robust Christian congregations in Rome would raise support for Rom. 13:4; 15:8; 1 Cor. 3:5), then “minister” (2 Cor. 3:6; Col. 4:7; him to make these journeys (see 15:23-26, 32). We should assume 1:7; 1 Tim. 4:6), and “deacon” (here; Phil. 1:1; 1 Tim. 3:8, 12). The that Paul was reinforcing relationships, but he was also “name-drop- term is used to convey one who is in service representing a greater ping,” so to speak, by listing the Christian leaders he knew whose authority. It is not a lowly term; when Paul had lowly service in mind, reputation would serve to secure his own. Surprisingly to many of us he utilized the term for “slave” (Greek, doulos), even when speaking today, we find that nearly one-third of these leaders are women! of himself (e.g., Rom. 1:1). In contrast, Paul used diakonos and other In the wider Greco-Roman society, where men were the authori- words from the diakon-root to indicate Christian ministry proper, ties, power brokers, and persons of perceived historical importance, not a lesser form of service. Thus, when Paul commended Phoebe there was little need to name women at all. In a personal letter, to the saints in Rome, this term indicates that her authority was as a referencing female family members might have been polite, but Christian minister--nothing less. even that would not have been expected. For example, we know that The very next person mentioned, and the first Roman Christian Jesus had brothers and sisters, but the Gospels--which are much to whom greetings were given, is Prisca, or Priscilla (16:3). Paul lengthier than Paul’s letters and thus provide even more space for greets his “co-workers,” Priscilla and Aquila. This wife and husband such information--have only passed on to us the names of Jesus’ duo were tentmakers by trade (like Paul) and Jewish Christians; brothers [e.g., Mark 6:3].) Paul’s naming of women in a collective Paul first met them after they were forced to leave Rome under letter written to circulate around several congregations in the pre- Emperor Claudius’s command (see Acts 18:2-3). They had partnered cincts of Rome exposes an astonishing counter-witness to prevailing in ministry with Paul in Corinth and Ephesus (vv. 18-19), taking a cultural practices. It demonstrates that many early Christian women crucial role in the theological education of Apollos in Ephesus (vv. held positions of influence and recognition among Roman believers, 24-28). Paul mentions the pair three times in his letters, making as well as having gained Paul’s respect. clear that their ministry partnership continued even from a distance (here, 1 Cor. 16:19; 2 Tim. 4:19). In fact, Paul’s praise for Priscilla The Women and Aquila highlights not only his personal indebtedness, but also, The first person named in Romans 16 is a woman, and it must in a sweeping statement, the gratitude of “all the churches of the be noted that she is not one of the nine Roman women who are Gentiles” (Rom. 16:4). named later. Phoebe was “a deacon of the church in Cenchreae” (v. Of the six times Priscilla and Aquila are named in the New 1). Cenchreae or Cenchrea [SEN-kree-uh] was the port city east of Testament, two things are noteworthy: (1) This husband and wife in Corinth on the isthmus linking the southern Greek Peloponnesus to this ministry partnership are always listed together; and (2) most of the mainland. Phoebe’s journey to Rome was a significant one, and the time, Priscilla’s name is listed prior to her husband’s (four of six Paul commends her. The Greek term behind the English word “com- times). Both of these factors indicate Priscilla’s prominence in the mend” has the literal sense of “standing with”; that is, Paul united early Christian movement. Ancient convention gave priority (or even his reputation with hers. She was likely a wealthy woman, based on exclusive place) to the male in a married couple--even more so than her ability to travel (from Cenchreae to Rome) and the fact that she is is common today, when “Mr. and Mrs.” remains standard. In light 73 of that ancient custom, it is likely that Priscilla was the better-known used of Mary in verse 6. Paul also greets Persis and calls her “be- minister in the couple. loved.” Her description is much like Tryphaena’s and Tryphosa’s, but The next woman in this list, in verse 6, is Mary; Paul notes her amplified: Persis worked “very” hard in the Lord. Her name indicates hard work among the Romans. The verb for her labor is kopiaō, the Persian lineage, perhaps; it is likely, then, that her presence in Rome term Paul used often of himself in his struggle for the gospel (see 1 was due to enslavement. Cor. 4:12; 15:10; Gal. 4:11; Phil. 2:6; Col. 1:29). So, the work Mary Even less information is available about the final three women undertook was that of Christian ministry, and it warranted the same mentioned in Paul’s greetings. Rufus’s mother, whose name we do term for intense and costly labor as Paul used of his own ministry. not know, Paul termed his own mother as well (v. 13). These We know no further specifics of Mary’s identity, but can say, based familial terms show high levels of mutual affection. In verse 15, on her name, that she was a Jewish-Christian woman. As the Gospel Julia and Nereus’s [NEE-ree-yoos’ehs] sister also receive greetings. accounts illustrate (and other historical records support) in Judea Alongside them, Paul greeted “all the Lord’s people [lit., saints] who and Galilee at the time, Mary was the most common female name are with them.” This is not the only time that collective greetings (as a form of “Miriam”). accompanied Paul’s individualized ones; the church in Priscilla and Junia receives Paul’s next greeting, along with her husband, Aquila’s house (v. 5), the family of Aristobulus [air-is-TOB-yuh-luhs] Andronicus (Rom. 16:7). Scholars have written much about Junia (v. 10), Narcissus’s family (v. 11), the “other brothers and sisters in the last decade. For years, Junia’s name was considered to be a with” Asyncritus [uh-SIN-krih-tuhs] as well as the others listed in man’s name; in many older translations of the Bible, it was translit- verse 14 along with him. Many other women would have been erated as “Junias.” Further study has nearly unanimously concluded, represented in each of these collective groups--unnamed but no less however, that reading it as a man’s name is highly improbable.2 This embedded into collections of Christian believers. fact would have been unremarkable, except for the information Paul Much has been made of two statements by Paul that seem, to provides about her. Most crucially, Paul called Andronicus and Junia some readers, to restrict women’s leadership among early Christians “outstanding among the apostles.” This is the only known instance (see 1 Cor. 14:34-35; 1 Tim. 2:12). There is not room here to delin- of a woman being named as an apostle (the foremost title held in eate the very complicated features of each of those statements within the earliest generation of Christians; see Acts 1:20-22). Furthermore, their contexts. Nevertheless, in Romans 16, we see clear evidence of Paul cited their status as “fellow Jews” or “kinfolk”† and sharers in Paul upholding actual women in ministry--hard work, partnership, imprisonment. Paul acknowledged further that Andronicus and Junia motherhood, and even, in one instance, apostleship! To put it even preceded him in coming to Christ.
Recommended publications
  • God Is Sovereign Notes
    Study Notes God Is Sovereign Romans 9:14-29 - Read Passage: epmkg.com/Romans9 ​ About Austin’s Study Notes This document contains information and resources Pastor Austin Rammell used to research and compile his weekly message. Resources are copyrighted by their respective authors and credited via footnotes. We encourage you to purchase the original resource materials to perform your own study. Notes THEODICY B: THE JUSTICE OF GOD (vv. 14–18) Again Paul anticipates his antagonists’ outcry and says it for them in verse 14: “What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all!” Or as Phillips renders it, “Do we conclude that God is monstrously unfair? Never!” At first it appears that Paul does not really answer the question but simply says it is impossible for God to do anything unjust. But the answer is sufficient. Luther comments, “Why, then should man complain that God acts unjustly, when this is impossible? Or, could it be possible that God is not God?” If we say God cannot be fair and be a God who elects, we show a faulty concept of God. If we think of God as an enlarged man, with human emotions and motives, how misled we are. God is infinite—we are finite. He knows all—our knowledge is incomplete and ephemeral. A. W. Tozer wrote: The Church has surrendered her once lofty concept of God and has substituted for it one so low, so ignoble, as to be utterly unworthy of thinking, worshiping men. This she has done not deliberately, but little by little and without her knowledge; and her very unawareness only makes her situation all the more tragic.
    [Show full text]
  • “Summer of Romans” Questions Romans 9 Esv
    “SUMMER OF ROMANS” QUESTIONS ROMANS 9 To prepare for CCP’s weekly Bible study, read the following passages and think through the questions below. ESV Romans 9:1 I am speaking the truth in Christ- I am not lying; my conscience bears me witness in the Holy Spirit- 2 that I have great sorrow and unceasing anguish in my heart. 3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brothers, my kinsmen according to the flesh. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises. 5 To them belong the patriarchs, and from their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ who is God over all, blessed forever. Amen. 1) What emotion does Paul have regarding Jewish people? Why do you think he feels this way? 2) Read Isaiah 53:6-8 and Galatians 3:13-14. How does Paul’s desire reflect the reality of Jesus’s experience? 3) According to verses 4-5, what properly belongs to the Israelites? 6 But it is not as though the word of God has failed. For not all who are descended from Israel belong to Israel, 7 and not all are children of Abraham because they are his offspring, but "Through Isaac shall your offspring be named." 8 This means that it is not the children of the flesh who are the children of God, but the children of the promise are counted as offspring.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chapters of Romans
    Liberty University Scholars Crossing An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible 5-2018 The Chapters of Romans Harold Willmington Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, Christianity Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Willmington, Harold, "The Chapters of Romans" (2018). An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible. 58. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/outline_chapters_bible/58 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the A Guide to the Systematic Study of the Bible at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in An Alliterated Outline for the Chapters of the Bible by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Romans SECTION OUTLINE ONE (ROMANS 1) Paul opens his letter to the Roman church by talking about God's anger with sin. The opening chapter may be thought of as a trial, where God is the judge and sinful humans are the accused. I. THE COURT RECORDER (1:1-17): Here Paul, author of Romans, provides his readers with some pretrial introductory material. A. His credentials (1:1, 5): Paul relates four facts about himself. 1. He is a servant of Jesus (1:1a). 2. He is an apostle (1:1b). 3. He has been set apart to preach the gospel (1:1c). 4. He is a missionary to the Gentiles (1:5). B. His Christ (1:2-4) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • God's Righteousness Revealed in His Choice of the Gentiles Over Israel
    Scholars Crossing Romans Study Guide Center for Global Ministries 2009 Romans 9: God's Righteousness Revealed in His Choice of the Gentiles over Israel Don Fanning Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_rom Recommended Citation Fanning, Don, "Romans 9: God's Righteousness Revealed in His Choice of the Gentiles over Israel" (2009). Romans Study Guide. 9. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/cgm_rom/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Global Ministries at Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in Romans Study Guide by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. R o m a n s 9 Study Guide P a g e | 1 NOTES Romans 9 God’s Righteousness Revealed in His ChoiCe between Israel and the Gentiles What about unsaved Israel? For 2,000 years, sinCe the seleCtion of Abraham, God had dealt almost exClusively with Israel on earth and gave all of His revelations to mankind only to and through them. Why, suddenly, are they not part of God’s plan for mankind? The simple answer is: they Could have been, should have been, but Chose not to be, so God Chose to give to the Gentiles the opportunity to reaCh the rest of the world until the end of times when God will again give Israel, as a nation, additional speCial revelations and signs. The Context of Romans 9‐11 is God’s Choosing the Gentiles and temporarily setting aside His priority on the nation of Israel until the end of the age.
    [Show full text]
  • Junia – a Woman Lost in Translation: the Name IOYNIAN in Romans 16:7 and Its History of Interpretation
    Open Theology 2020; 6: 646–660 Women and Gender in the Bible and the Biblical World Andrea Hartmann* Junia – A Woman Lost in Translation: The Name IOYNIAN in Romans 16:7 and its History of Interpretation https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2020-0138 received June 30, 2020; accepted October 27, 2020 Abstract: The name of the second person greeted in Romans 16:7 is given as IOYNIAN, a form whose gramma- tical gender could be either feminine or masculine which leads to the question: Is it Junia or Junias – awomanor aman– who is greeted alongside Andronicus as “outstanding among the apostles?” This article highlights early influential answers to this question in the history of interpretation (John Chrysostom’scommentary,thedisciple- ship list of Pseudo-Epiphanius, Luther’s translation, and Calvin’s interpretation) showing that societal percep- tions of women’s roles were a factor in how they interpreted IOYNIAN. The article then summarises the last 150 years of interpretation history which saw (a) the disappearance of Junia from the text and from scholarly discussion due to the impact of the short-from hypothesis in the nineteenth century, (b) the challenge to this male interpretation in connection with second wave feminism, and (c) the restoration of the female reading in the ensuing debate. Bringing together the main lines of the argument, it will be shown that there is only one reading supported by the evidence, the female reading which throughout the centuries was the more difficult reading in light of the church’sandsociety’s perception of women’s
    [Show full text]
  • The Sovereignty of God, Part 5 --- Romans 9:18-24 June 23, 2019
    The Sovereignty of God, Part 5 --- Romans 9:18-24 June 23, 2019 So then He has mercy on whom He desires, and He hardens whom He desires. 19You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who resists His will?” 20On the contrary, who are you, O man, who answers back to God? The thing molded will not say to the molder, “Why did you make me like this,” will it? 21Or does not the potter have a right over the clay, to make from the same lump one vessel for honorable use and another for common use? 22What if God, although willing to demonstrate His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much patience vessels of wrath prepared for destruction? 23And He did so to make known the riches of His glory upon vessels of mercy, which He prepared beforehand for glory, 24even us, whom He also called, not from among Jews only, but also from among Gentiles. Introduction John Calvin was a brilliant, highly intelligent man. But he was convinced that the Holy Spirit working through the faithful study and teaching of the Word of God could accomplish far more than all his brilliance. At one point in his life, Calvin was forced out of Geneva because of civil unrest against him and his leadership. He had been teaching through the book of Romans verse by verse before he left. A few years after he was forced to leave, he was asked to return to Geneva. The Sunday after his arrival, he returned to the church where he had been pastor.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 Is Paul's Conclusion To
    1 Ted Kirnbauer Romans 16 9/2/18 Chapter 16 is Paul’s conclusion to this great letter and his personal greetings and commendations to individuals he knows in Rome. Many in this list of names are only mentioned here, but even this teaches us many things about the infant church and culture into which it was born. In chapter 15 Paul had spoken of a mutual indebtedness among believers. The Gentiles were indebted to the Jewish believers for the salvation they enjoyed, so they gave a financial gift to help the Jewish Christians in Rome who were destitute (15:27). By receiving the gift, the Jews would then be indebted to the Gentile believers for their help. This is part of the beauty of the church. The church is a gathering of people who depend on one another. In Romans 15:5–7 Paul said, “May the God who gives perseverance and encouragement grant you to be of the same mind with one another according to Christ Jesus, so that with one accord you may with one voice glorify the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ. Therefore, accept one another, just as Christ also accepted us to the glory of God.” In Romans 16, this theme is applied to specific individuals. In this passage, Paul mentions 26 individuals, two families, and possibly three house churches (it is unclear what “those of Aristobulus” [16:10] and “those of Narcissus” [16:11] refer to. Although most translations insert the words, “of the household of” or “of the family of,” those additions are not present in the original Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • When Paul's Desire and God's Will Collide: a Reading of Romans 9:1•fi18
    WHEN PAUL'S DESIRE AND GOD'S WILL COLLIDE (ROMANS 9:1–18) WHEN PAUL'S DESIRE AND GOD'S WILL COLLIDE: A READING OF ROMANS 9:1–18 By RONY KOZMAN, B.SC., M.DIV. A Thesis Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts McMaster University © Copyright by Rony Kozman, September 2013 MASTER OF ARTS (2013) McMaster University (Religious Studies) Hamilton, ON TITLE: When Paul's Desire and God's Will Collide: A Reading of Romans 9:1–18 AUTHOR: Rony Kozman, B.Sc. (McMaster University), M.Div. (The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary) SUPERVISOR: Professor Stephen Westerholm NUMBER OF PAGES: v, 96 ii ABSTRACT This thesis proposes a new reading of Romans 9:1–18. The history of biblical interpretation of the passage is explored with the purpose of mapping out the diversity of interpretations and noting points of agreement between these interpretations and that which is proposed. The main objective is the proposed reading of Rom 9:1–18. It is argued that when full weight is given to Rom 9:1–5 as Paul's fleshly desire, what follows in 9:6–18 is correctly understood as Paul's appropriation of Israel's Scripture to address his own desire and grief. This brings to the fore a recurrent theme in the pentateuchal passages that Paul evokes: the conflicting desire of significant figures in Israel's history – Abraham, Isaac, and Moses – with God's will. As Paul applies Scripture to his own situation, Paul's desire for the salvation of his fellow Israelites based on ethnic descent conflicts with God's will to harden Israel and call Gentiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 8 1-11 There Is No Condemnation
    Peter Duckworth Romans Series, Autumn 2017 NO More Condemnation: Romans 8:1-11 Therefore, there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus, 2 because through Christ Jesus the law of the Spirit who gives life has set 3 you[a]free from the law of sin and death. For what the law was powerless to do because it was weakened by the flesh,[b] God did by sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh to be a sin offering.[c] And so he condemned sin in the flesh, 4 in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fully met in us, who do not live according to the flesh but according to the Spirit. 5 Those who live according to the flesh have their minds set on what the flesh desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. 6 The mind governed by the flesh is death, but the mind governed by the Spirit is life and peace. 7 The mind governed by the flesh is hostile to God; it does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. 8 Those who are in the realm of the flesh cannot please God. 9 You, however, are not in the realm of the flesh but are in the realm of the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, they do not belong to Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans 16:1-16 (Week 110) 01/17/2020 What Matters to Paul
    1 Romans 16:1-16 (Week 110) 01/17/2020 What Matters to Paul This is my message written out prior to being preached. Please excuse the bullet point format and any grammatical mistakes. This is meant to be spoken. • If you have your Bibles, please open to Romans Chapter 16. • I’ll begin by asking for Grace as I read the first 16 verses. I commend to you our sister Phoebe, a servant of the church at Cenchreae, that you may welcome her in the Lord in a way worthy of the saints, and help her in whatever she may need from you, for she has been a patron of many and of myself as well. Greet Prisca and Aquila, my fellow workers in Christ Jesus, who risked their necks for my life, to whom not only I give thanks but all the churches of the Gentiles give thanks as well. Greet also the church in their house. Greet my beloved Epaenetus, who was the first convert to Christ in Asia. Greet Mary, who has worked hard for you. Greet Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen and my fellow prisoners. They are well known to the apostles, and they were in Christ before me. Greet Ampliatus, my beloved in the Lord. Greet Urbanus, our fellow worker in Christ, and my beloved Stachys. Greet Apelles, who is approved in Christ. Greet those who belong to the family of Aristobulus. Greet my kinsman Herodion. Greet those in the Lord who belong to the family of Narcissus. Greet those workers in the Lord, Tryphaena and Tryphosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Ill Coypright Page
    This material has been provided by Asbury Theological Seminary in good faith of following ethical procedures in its production and end use. The Copyright law of the united States (title 17, United States code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyright material. Under certain condition specified in the law, libraries and archives are authorized to finish a photocopy or other reproduction. One of these specific conditions is that the photocopy or reproduction is not to be “used for any purpose other than private study, scholarship, or research.” If a user makes a request for, or later uses, a photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of “fair use,” that user may be liable for copyright infringement. This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept a copying order if, in its judgment, fulfillment of the order would involve violation of copyright law. By using this material, you are consenting to abide by this copyright policy. Any duplication, reproduction, or modification of this material without express written consent from Asbury Theological Seminary and/or the original publisher is prohibited. Contact B.L. Fisher Library Asbury Theological Seminary 204 N. Lexington Ave. Wilmore, KY 40390 B.L. Fisher Library’s Digital Content place.asburyseminary.edu Asbury Theological Seminary 205 North Lexington Avenue 800.2ASBURY Wilmore, Kentucky 40390 asburyseminary.edu AN EVALUATION OF ROMANS 1 1 :25-26 AS THE RESULT OF IMPROMPTU PRAYER IN ROMANS 9-11 by Dennis A. Hitchcock Approved: .. Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Biblical Studies Asbury Theological Seminary December 1995 AN EVALUATION OF ROMANS 11:25-26 AS THE RESULT OF IMPROMPTU PRAYER IN ROMANS 9-11 by Dennis A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israel of God: Part 1 – Romans 9 I
    The Israel of God: Part 1 – Romans 9 I. INTRODUCTION A. John 3:36 1. We’re going to be dealing with some tough stuff today so I want to begin here. 2. It’ll help us keep the proper perspective in our examination of Romans 9. He who believes in the Son has everlasting life; and he who does not believe the Son shall not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him. 3. The difference between salvation & judgment is faith in Christ. 4. But notice what John says - He who believes in the Son has everlasting life Not - He who has everlasting life believes in the Son. 5. John locates salvation in Jesus. Faith in Jesus taps that salvation. 6. Keep this in mind now as we turn to Romans 9. B. Romans 1. If, as many believe, ch. 8 is the Summit Peak of the Gospel, then chs. 9-11 are a cliff they want to stay far away from. 2. Paul says things here that are difficult to both understand & accept. 3. Several doctrinal controversies find their origin here, specially in ch. 9. 4. And for that reason, my method today will be opposite from what we usually do. a. Normally, we read the text, then explain & apply it. b. This morning, at a couple points I’ll explain, then read it. Here’s why . 5. What Paul says in chs. 9-11 cannot be taken in isolation from what he’s already said in Chs. 1-8. a. Yet some commentators do precisely that.
    [Show full text]