Causal Inference: What If

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Causal Inference: What If Causal Inference: What If Miguel A. Hernán, James M. Robins October 1, 2019 ii Causal Inference Contents Introduction: Towards less casual causal inferences vii I Causal inference without models 1 1Adefinition of causal effect 3 1.1 Individual causal effects....................... 3 1.2 Average causal effects........................ 4 1.3 Measures of causal effect....................... 7 1.4 Random variability .......................... 8 1.5Causationversusassociation.................... 10 2 Randomized experiments 13 2.1Randomization............................ 13 2.2Conditionalrandomization..................... 17 2.3Standardization............................ 19 2.4 Inverse probability weighting .................... 20 3 Observational studies 25 3.1 Identifiability conditions . ..................... 25 3.2 Exchangeability ............................ 27 3.3Positivity............................... 30 3.4 Consistency: First, definethecounterfactualoutcome...... 31 3.5 Consistency: Second, link counterfactuals to the observed data . 35 3.6Thetargettrial............................ 37 4Effect modification 41 4.1 Definition of effect modification................... 41 4.2 Stratification to identify effect modification............ 43 4.3 Why care about effect modification................. 45 4.4 Stratificationasaformofadjustment............... 47 4.5Matchingasanotherformofadjustment.............. 49 4.6 Effect modificationandadjustmentmethods........... 50 5 Interaction 55 5.1Interactionrequiresajointintervention.............. 55 5.2Identifyinginteraction........................ 56 5.3Counterfactualresponsetypesandinteraction........... 58 5.4 Sufficientcauses........................... 60 5.5 Sufficientcauseinteraction..................... 63 5.6 Counterfactuals or sufficient-componentcauses?.......... 65 iv Causal Inference 6 Graphical representation of causal effects 69 6.1Causaldiagrams........................... 69 6.2Causaldiagramsandmarginalindependence........... 71 6.3Causaldiagramsandconditionalindependence.......... 73 6.4Positivityandconsistencyincausaldiagrams........... 75 6.5 A structural classificationofbias.................. 78 6.6 The structure of effect modification................. 80 7 Confounding 83 7.1Thestructureofconfounding.................... 83 7.2 Confounding and exchangeability .................. 85 7.3 Confounding and the backdoor criterion .............. 87 7.4 Confounding and confounders .................... 90 7.5Single-worldinterventiongraphs.................. 93 7.6 Confounding adjustment . ..................... 94 8 Selection bias 99 8.1Thestructureofselectionbias................... 99 8.2Examplesofselectionbias...................... 101 8.3Selectionbiasandconfounding................... 103 8.4Selectionbiasandcensoring..................... 105 8.5Howtoadjustforselectionbias................... 107 8.6Selectionwithoutbias........................ 110 9 Measurement bias 113 9.1Measurementerror.......................... 113 9.2Thestructureofmeasurementerror................ 114 9.3 Mismeasured confounders . ..................... 116 9.4 Intention-to-treat effect: the effect of a misclassified treatment . 117 9.5 Per-protocol effect.......................... 119 10 Random variability 123 10.1 Identificationversusestimation.................. 123 10.2 Estimation of causal effects.................... 126 10.3Themythofthesuper-population................. 128 10.4Theconditionality“principle”................... 129 10.5Thecurseofdimensionality.................... 133 II Causal inference with models 137 11 Why model? 139 11.1Datacannotspeakforthemselves................. 139 11.2Parametricestimatorsoftheconditionalmean.......... 141 11.3Nonparametricestimatorsoftheconditionalmean....... 142 11.4Smoothing.............................. 143 11.5 The bias-variance trade-off ..................... 145 12 IP weighting and marginal structural models 149 12.1Thecausalquestion......................... 149 12.2EstimatingIPweightsviamodeling................ 150 12.3StabilizedIPweights........................ 153 12.4Marginalstructuralmodels..................... 155 12.5 Effect modificationandmarginalstructuralmodels....... 157 CONTENTS v 12.6Censoringandmissingdata.................... 158 13 Standardization and the parametric g-formula 161 13.1StandardizationasanalternativetoIPweighting........ 161 13.2Estimatingthemeanoutcomeviamodeling........... 163 13.3 Standardizing the mean outcome to the confounder distribution 164 13.4IPweightingorstandardization?................. 165 13.5Howseriouslydowetakeourestimates?............. 167 14 G-estimation of structural nested models 171 14.1Thecausalquestionrevisited................... 171 14.2 Exchangeability revisited . ..................... 172 14.3Structuralnestedmeanmodels.................. 173 14.4Rankpreservation.......................... 175 14.5G-estimation............................. 177 14.6Structuralnestedmodelswithtwoormoreparameters..... 179 15 Outcome regression and propensity scores 183 15.1Outcomeregression......................... 183 15.2Propensityscores.......................... 185 15.3 Propensity stratificationandstandardization........... 186 15.4Propensitymatching........................ 188 15.5Propensitymodels,structuralmodels,predictivemodels.... 189 16 Instrumental variable estimation 193 16.1Thethreeinstrumentalconditions................. 193 16.2TheusualIVestimand....................... 196 16.3Afourthidentifyingcondition:homogeneity........... 198 16.4Analternativefourthcondition:monotonicity.......... 200 16.5Thethreeinstrumentalconditionsrevisited........... 204 16.6Instrumentalvariableestimationversusothermethods..... 206 17 Causal survival analysis 209 17.1Hazardsandrisks.......................... 209 17.2Fromhazardstorisks........................ 211 17.3Whycensoringmatters....................... 214 17.4IPweightingofmarginalstructuralmodels............ 216 17.5Theparametricg-formula..................... 217 17.6G-estimationofstructuralnestedmodels............. 219 18 Variable selection for causal inference 223 18.1 The different goals of variable selection .............. 223 18.2Variablesthatinduceoramplifybias............... 225 18.3Causalinferenceandmachinelearning.............. 228 18.4Doublyrobustmachinelearningestimators............ 229 18.5 Variable selection is a difficultproblem.............. 230 III Causal inference from complex longitudinal data 233 19 Time-varying treatments 235 19.1 The causal effectoftime-varyingtreatments........... 235 19.2Treatmentstrategies........................ 236 19.3Sequentiallyrandomizedexperiments............... 237 vi Causal Inference 19.4Sequentialexchangeability..................... 240 19.5 Identifiability under some but not all treatment strategies . 241 19.6 Time-varying confounding and time-varying confounders .... 245 20 Treatment-confounder feedback 247 20.1Theelementsoftreatment-confounderfeedback......... 247 20.2Thebiasoftraditionalmethods.................. 249 20.3Whytraditionalmethodsfail................... 251 20.4 Why traditional methods cannot be fixed............. 253 20.5Adjustingforpasttreatment.................... 254 21 G-methods for time-varying treatments 257 21.1Theg-formulafortime-varyingtreatments............ 257 21.2IPweightingfortime-varyingtreatments............. 260 21.3Adoublyrobustestimatorfortime-varyingtreatments..... 265 21.4G-estimationfortime-varyingtreatments............. 267 21.5Censoringisatime-varyingtreatment.............. 273 22 Target trial emulation 277 22.1Thetargettrial(revisited)..................... 277 22.2 Causal effectsinrandomizedtrials................ 278 22.3 Causal effects in observational analyses that emulate a target trial281 22.4Timezero.............................. 283 22.5 A unifiedanalysisforcausalinference............... 284 INTRODUCTION: TOWARDS LESS CASUAL CAUSAL INFERENCES Causal Inference is an admittedly pretentious title for a book. Causal inference is a complex scientific task that relies on triangulating evidence from multiple sources and on the application of a variety of methodological approaches. No book can possibly provide a comprehensive description of methodologies for causal inference across the sciences. The authors of any Causal Inference book will have to choose which aspects of causal inference they want to emphasize. The title of this introduction reflects our own choices: a book that helps scientists–especially health and social scientists–generate and analyze data to make causal inferences that are explicit about both the causal question and the assumptions underlying the data analysis. Unfortunately, the scientific literature is plagued by studies in which the causal question is not explicitly stated and the investigators’ unverifiable assumptions are not declared. This causal attitude towards causal inference has led to a great deal of confusion. For example, it is not uncommon to find studies in which the effect estimates are hard to interpret because the data analysis methods cannot appropriately answer the causal question (were it explicitly stated) under the investigators’ assumptions (were they declared). In this book, we stress the need to take the causal question seriously enough to articulate it, and to delineate the separate roles of data and assumptions for causal inference. Once these foundations are in place, causal inferences become necessarily less casual, which helps prevent confusion. The book then describes various data analysis approaches that can be used to estimate the causal effect of interest under a particular set of assumptions when
Recommended publications
  • INTUITION .THE PHILOSOPHY of HENRI BERGSON By
    THE RHYTHM OF PHILOSOPHY: INTUITION ·ANI? PHILOSO~IDC METHOD IN .THE PHILOSOPHY OF HENRI BERGSON By CAROLE TABOR FlSHER Bachelor Of Arts Taylor University Upland, Indiana .. 1983 Submitted ~o the Faculty of the Graduate College of the · Oklahoma State University in partial fulfi11ment of the requirements for . the Degree of . Master of Arts May, 1990 Oklahoma State. Univ. Library THE RHY1HM OF PlllLOSOPHY: INTUITION ' AND PfnLoSOPlllC METHOD IN .THE PHILOSOPHY OF HENRI BERGSON Thesis Approved: vt4;;. e ·~lu .. ·~ests AdVIsor /l4.t--OZ. ·~ ,£__ '', 13~6350' ii · ,. PREFACE The writing of this thesis has bee~ a tiring, enjoyable, :Qustrating and challenging experience. M.,Bergson has introduced me to ·a whole new way of doing . philosophy which has put vitality into the process. I have caught a Bergson bug. His vision of a collaboration of philosophers using his intuitional m~thod to correct, each others' work and patiently compile a body of philosophic know: ledge is inspiring. I hope I have done him justice in my description of that vision. If I have succeeded and that vision catches your imagination I hope you Will make the effort to apply it. Please let me know of your effort, your successes and your failures. With the current challenges to rationalist epistemology, I believe the time has come to give Bergson's method a try. My discovery of Bergson is. the culmination of a development of my thought, one that started long before I began my work at Oklahoma State. However, there are some people there who deserv~. special thanks for awakening me from my ' "''' analytic slumber.
    [Show full text]
  • Duration, Temporality and Self
    Duration, Temporality and Self: Prospects for the Future of Bergsonism by Elena Fell A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy at the University of Central Lancashire 2007 2 Student Declaration Concurrent registration for two or more academic awards I declare that white registered as a candidate for the research degree, I have not been a registered candidate or enrolled student for another award of the University or other academic or professional institution. Material submitted for another award I declare that no material contained in the thesis has been used in any other submission for an academic award and is solely my own work Signature of Candidate Type of Award Doctor of Philosophy Department Centre for Professional Ethics Abstract In philosophy time is one of the most difficult subjects because, notoriously, it eludes rationalization. However, Bergson succeeds in presenting time effectively as reality that exists in its own right. Time in Bergson is almost accessible, almost palpable in a discourse which overcomes certain difficulties of language and traditional thought. Bergson equates time with duration, a genuine temporal succession of phenomena defined by their position in that succession, and asserts that time is a quality belonging to the nature of all things rather than a relation between supposedly static elements. But Rergson's theory of duration is not organised, nor is it complete - fragments of it are embedded in discussions of various aspects of psychology, evolution, matter, and movement. My first task is therefore to extract the theory of duration from Bergson's major texts in Chapters 2-4.
    [Show full text]
  • Yesterday, Today, and Forever Hebrews 13:8 a Sermon Preached in Duke University Chapel on August 29, 2010 by the Revd Dr Sam Wells
    Yesterday, Today, and Forever Hebrews 13:8 A Sermon preached in Duke University Chapel on August 29, 2010 by the Revd Dr Sam Wells Who are you? This is a question we only get to ask one another in the movies. The convention is for the question to be addressed by a woman to a handsome man just as she’s beginning to realize he isn’t the uncomplicated body-and-soulmate he first seemed to be. Here’s one typical scenario: the war is starting to go badly; the chief of the special unit takes a key officer aside, and sends him on a dangerous mission to infiltrate the enemy forces. This being Hollywood, the officer falls in love with a beautiful woman while in enemy territory. In a moment of passion and mystery, it dawns on her that he’s not like the local men. So her bewitched but mistrusting eyes stare into his, and she says, “Who are you?” Then there’s the science fiction version. In this case the man develops an annoying habit of suddenly, without warning, traveling in time, or turning into a caped superhero. Meanwhile the woman, though drawn to his awesome good looks and sympathetic to his commendable desire to save the universe, yet finds herself taking his unexpected and unusual absences rather personally. So on one of the few occasions she gets to look into his eyes when they’re not undergoing some kind of chemical transformation, she says, with the now-familiar, bewitched-but-mistrusting expression, “Who are you?” “Who are you?” We never ask one another this question for fear of sounding melodramatic, like we’re in a movie.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Adaption Gallery
    Introduction In 1991, a group of Heritage Center staff began meeting informally after work to discuss a Heritage Center expansion. This “committee” was formalized in 1992 by Jim Sperry, Superintendent of the State Historical Society of North Dakota, and became known as the Space Planning About Center Expansion (SPACE) committee. The committee consisted of several Historical Society staff and John Hoganson representing the North Dakota Geological Survey. Ultimately, some of the SPACE committee ideas were rejected primarily because of anticipated high cost such as a planetarium, arboretum, and day care center but many of the ideas have become reality in the new Heritage Center expansion. In 2009, the state legislature appropriated $40 million for a $52 million Heritage Center expansion. The State Historical Society of North Dakota Foundation was given the task to raise the difference. On November 23, 2010 groundbreaking for the expansion took place. Planning for three new galleries began in earnest: the Governor’s Gallery (for large, temporary, travelling exhibits), Innovation Gallery: Early Peoples, and Adaptation Gallery: Geologic Time. The Figure 1. Partial Stratigraphic column of North Dakota showing Figure 2. Plate tectonic video. North Dakota's position is indicated by the the age of the Geologic Time Gallery displays. red symbol. JULY 2014 1 Orientation Featured in the Orientation area is an interactive touch table that provides a timeline of geological and evolutionary events in North Dakota from 600 million years ago to the present. Visitors activate the timeline by scrolling to learn how the geology, environment, climate, and life have changed in North Dakota through time.
    [Show full text]
  • Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting
    European Medicines Agency June 1995 CPMP/ICH/377/95 ICH Topic E 2 A Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting Step 5 NOTE FOR GUIDANCE ON CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING (CPMP/ICH/377/95) APPROVAL BY CPMP November 1994 DATE FOR COMING INTO OPERATION June 1995 7 Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HB, UK Tel. (44-20) 74 18 85 75 Fax (44-20) 75 23 70 40 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.emea.eu.int EMEA 2006 Reproduction and/or distribution of this document is authorised for non commercial purposes only provided the EMEA is acknowledged CLINICAL SAFETY DATA MANAGEMENT: DEFINITIONS AND STANDARDS FOR EXPEDITED REPORTING ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline 1. INTRODUCTION It is important to harmonise the way to gather and, if necessary, to take action on important clinical safety information arising during clinical development. Thus, agreed definitions and terminology, as well as procedures, will ensure uniform Good Clinical Practice standards in this area. The initiatives already undertaken for marketed medicines through the CIOMS-1 and CIOMS-2 Working Groups on expedited (alert) reports and periodic safety update reporting, respectively, are important precedents and models. However, there are special circumstances involving medicinal products under development, especially in the early stages and before any marketing experience is available. Conversely, it must be recognised that a medicinal product will be under various stages of development and/or marketing in different countries, and safety data from marketing experience will ordinarily be of interest to regulators in countries where the medicinal product is still under investigational-only (Phase 1, 2, or 3) status.
    [Show full text]
  • Staphylococcus Aureus Bloodstream Infection Treatment Guideline
    Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infection Treatment Guideline Purpose: To provide a framework for the evaluation and management patients with Methicillin- Susceptible (MSSA) and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infections (BSI). The recommendations below are guidelines for care and are not meant to replace clinical judgment. The initial page includes a brief version of the guidance followed by a more detailed discussion of the recommendations with supporting evidence. Also included is an algorithm describing management of patients with blood cultures positive for gram-positive cocci. Brief Key Points: 1. Don’t ignore it – Staphylococcus aureus isolated from a blood culture is never a contaminant. All patients with S. aureus in their blood should be treated with appropriate antibiotics and evaluated for a source of infection. 2. Control the source a. Removing infected catheters and prosthetic devices – Retention of infected central venous catheters and prosthetic devices in the setting of S. aureus bacteremia (SAB) has been associated with prolonged bacteremia, treatment failure and death. These should be removed if medically possible. i. Retention of prosthetic material is associated with an increased likelihood of SAB relapse and removal should be considered even if not clearly infected b. Evaluate for metastatic infections (endocarditis, osteomyelitis, abscesses, etc.) – Metastatic infections and endocarditis are quite common in SAB (11-31% patients with SAB have endocarditis). i. All patients should have a thorough history taken and exam performed with any new complaint evaluated for possible metastatic infection. ii. Echocardiograms should be strongly considered for all patients with SAB iii. All patients with a prosthetic valve, pacemaker/ICD present, or persistent bacteremia (follow up blood cultures positive) should undergo a transesophageal echocardiogram 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Hebrews 13:8 Jesus Christ the Eternal Unchanging Son Of
    Hebrews 13:8 The Unchanging Christ is the Same Forever Jesus Christ the Messiah is eternally trustworthy. The writer of Hebrews simply said, "Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever" (Hebrews 13:8). In a turbulent and fast-changing world that goes from one crisis to the next nothing seems permanent. However, this statement of faith has been a source of strength and encouragement for Christians in every generation for centuries. In a world that is flying apart politically, economically, personally and spiritually Jesus Christ is our only secure anchor. Through all the changes in society, the church around us, and in our spiritual life within us, Jesus Christ changes not. He is ever the same. As our personal faith seizes hold of Him we will participate in His unchangeableness. Like Christ it will know no change, and will always be the same. He is just as faithful now as He has ever been. Jesus Christ is the same for all eternity. He is changeless, immutable! He has not changed, and He will never change. The same one who was the source and object of triumphant faith yesterday is also the one who is all-sufficient and all-powerful today to save, sustain and guide us into the eternal future. He will continue to be our Savior forever. He steadily says to us, "I will never fail you nor forsake you." In His awesome prayer the night before His death by crucifixion, Jesus prayed, "Now, Father, glorify Me together with Yourself, with the glory which I had with You before the world was" (John 17:5).
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship of Drought Frequency and Duration to Time Scales
    Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, 17-22 January 1993, Anaheim, California if ~ THE RELATIONSHIP OF DROUGHT FREQUENCY AND DURATION TO TIME SCALES Thomas B. McKee, Nolan J. Doesken and John Kleist Department of Atmospheric Science Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO 80523 1.0 INTRODUCTION Five practical issues become important in any analysis of drought. These include: 1) time scale, 2) The definition of drought has continually been probability, 3) precipitation deficit, 4) application of the a stumbling block for drought monitoring and analysis. definition to precipitation and to the five water supply Wilhite and Glantz (1985) completed a thorough review variables, and 5) the relationship of the definition to the of dozens of drought definitions and identified six impacts of drought. Frequency, duration and intensity overall categories: meteorological, climatological, of drought all become functions that depend on the atmospheric, agricultural, hydrologic and water implicitly or explicitly established time scales. Our management. Dracup et al. (1980) also reviewed experience in providing drought information to a definitions. All points of view seem to agree that collection of decision makers in Colorado is that they drought is a condition of insufficient moisture caused have a need for current conditions expressed in terms by a deficit in precipitation over some time period. of probability, water deficit, and water supply as a Difficulties are primarily related to the time period over percent of average using recent climatic history (the which deficits accumulate and to the connection of the last 30 to 100 years) as the basis for comparison. No deficit in precipitation to deficits in usable water single drought definition or analysis method has sources and the impacts that ensue.
    [Show full text]
  • Yesterday and Today
    Yesterday and Today IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Yesterday_and_Today_FC.indd 1 3/2/17 2:01 PM 2 Schools Past At school, you learn to read and write and do math, just like children long ago. These things are the same. Then This is what a school looked like in the past. The past means long ago, the time before now. Back then, schools had only one room. Children of all ages learned together. Abacus Hornbook There were no buses Children used Children learned to or cars. Everyone chalk to write read from a hornbook. walked to school. on small boards They used an abacus called slates. for math. yesterday and today_2-3.indd 6 3/2/17 2:04 PM 3 and Present Some things about school How are schools have changed. To change today different from is to become different. schools long ago? Now This photograph shows a school in the present. The present means now. Today, most schools have many rooms. Most children in a class are about the same age. Children may take a bus to school, or get a ride in a car. Special-needs school Home school Children have notebooks, books, There are different and computers. These are tools kinds of schools. for learning. A tool is something people use to do work. yesterday and today_2-3.indd 7 3/2/17 2:05 PM 4 Communities Past A community is a place where people live. In some ways, communities haven’t changed. They have places to live, places to work, and places to buy things.
    [Show full text]
  • The Standard Model of Particle Physics - I
    The Standard Model of Particle Physics - I Lecture 3 • Quantum Numbers and Spin • Symmetries and Conservation Principles • Weak Interactions • Accelerators and Facilities Eram Rizvi Royal Institution - London 21st February 2012 Outline The Standard Model of Particle Physics - I - quantum numbers - spin statistics A Century of Particle Scattering 1911 - 2011 - scales and units - symmetries and conservation principles - the weak interaction - overview of periodic table → atomic theory - particle accelerators - Rutherford scattering → birth of particle physics - quantum mechanics - a quick overview The Standard Model of Particle Physics - II - particle physics and the Big Bang - perturbation theory & gauge theory - QCD and QED successes of the SM A Particle Physicist's World - The Exchange - neutrino sector of the SM Model - quantum particles Beyond the Standard Model - particle detectors - where the SM fails - the exchange model - the Higgs boson - Feynman diagrams - the hierarchy problem - supersymmetry The Energy Frontier - large extra dimensions - selected new results - future experiments Eram Rizvi Lecture 3 - Royal Institution - London 2 Why do electrons not fall into lowest energy atomic orbital? Niels Bohr’s atomic model: angular momentum is quantised ⇒ only discreet orbitals allowed Why do electrons not collapse into low energy state? Eram Rizvi Lecture 3 - Royal Institution - London 3 What do we mean by ‘electron’ ? Quantum particles possess spin charge = -1 Measured in units of ħ = h/2π spin = ½ 2 mass = 0.511 MeV/c All particles
    [Show full text]
  • That's a Lot to PROCESS! Pitfalls of Popular Path Models
    1 That’s a lot to PROCESS! Pitfalls of Popular Path Models Julia M. Rohrer,1 Paul Hünermund,2 Ruben C. Arslan,3 & Malte Elson4 Path models to test claims about mediation and moderation are a staple of psychology. But applied researchers sometimes do not understand the underlying causal inference problems and thus endorse conclusions that rest on unrealistic assumptions. In this article, we aim to provide a clear explanation for the limited conditions under which standard procedures for mediation and moderation analysis can succeed. We discuss why reversing arrows or comparing model fit indices cannot tell us which model is the right one, and how tests of conditional independence can at least tell us where our model goes wrong. Causal modeling practices in psychology are far from optimal but may be kept alive by domain norms which demand that every article makes some novel claim about processes and boundary conditions. We end with a vision for a different research culture in which causal inference is pursued in a much slower, more deliberate and collaborative manner. Psychologists often do not content themselves with claims about the mere existence of effects. Instead, they strive for an understanding of the underlying processes and potential boundary conditions. The PROCESS macro (Hayes, 2017) has been an extraordinarily popular tool for these purposes, as it empowers users to run mediation and moderation analyses—as well as any combination of the two—with a large number of pre-programmed model templates in a familiar software environment. However, psychologists’ enthusiasm for PROCESS models may sometimes outpace their training.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Yesterday, How Many Times Did You Eat Vegetables, Not Counting French Fries?
    EFNEP Youth Group Checklist Grades 6th- 8th Name Date This is not a test. There are no wrong answers. Please answer the questions for yourself. Circle the answer that best describes you. For these questions, think about how you usually do things. 0 1 2 3 4 1. Yesterday, how many times did you eat vegetables, not counting French fries? Include cooked vegetables, canned vegetables None 1 time 2 times 3 times 4+ times and salads. If you ate two different vegetables in a meal or a snack, count them as two times. 2. Yesterday, how many times did you eat fruit, not counting juice? Include fresh, frozen, canned, and None 1 time 2 times 3 times 4+ times dried fruits. If you ate two different fruits in a meal or a snack, count them as two times. 3. Yesterday, how many times did you drink nonfat or 1% low-fat milk? Include low-fat chocolate or None 1 time 2 times 3 times 4+ times flavored milk, and low-fat milk on cereal. 4. Yesterday, how many times did you drink sweetened drinks like soda, fruit-flavored drinks, sports None 1 time 2 times 3 times drinks, energy drinks and vitamin water? Do not include 100% fruit juice. 5. When you eat grain products, how often do you eat whole grains, like Once in a Most of brown rice instead of white rice, Never Sometimes Always while the time whole grain bread instead of white bread and whole grain cereals? 6. When you eat out at a restaurant or fast food place, how often do Once in a Most of Never Sometimes Always you make healthy choices when while the time deciding what to eat? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7.
    [Show full text]