DOCSLIB.ORG

Jure Gašparič Slovenski Parlament Slovenski Parlament

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jure Gašparič Slovenski Parlament Slovenski Parlament Jure Gašparič Slovenski parlament Slovenski parlament 2014 Elektronska izdaja 1.0 Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino Jure Gašparič Slovenski parlament : Politično-zgodovinski pregled od začetka prvega do konca šestega mandata (1992 – 2014) Avtor: Jure Gašparič Urednika: Mojca Šorn Andrej Pančur Recenzenta: Zdenko Čepič Božo Repe Redakcija TEI, dodatno kodiranje TEI in računalniški zapis: Andrej Pančur Elektronska izdaja 1.0 Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino 2014 http://www.sistory.si/SISTORY:ID:26950 To delo avtorja Jure Gašparič je ponujeno pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Nekomercialno-Brez predelav 2.5 Slovenija licenco. CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnjica, Ljubljana 328(497.4)"1992/2014"(0.034.2) 323(497.4)"1992/2014"(0.034.2) GAŠPARIČ, Jure, 1977- Slovenski parlament [Elektronski vir] : politično-zgodovinski pregled od začetka prvega do konca šestega mandata (1992-2014) / Jure Gašparič. - Elektronska izdaja 1.0. - El. knjiga. - Ljubljana : Inštitut za novejšo zgodovino, 2014 Način dostopa (URL): http://www.sistory.si/SISTORY:ID:26950 ISBN 978-961-6386-48-7 (html) ISBN 978-961-6386-49-4 (ePub) ISBN 978-961-6386-50-0 (pdf) ISBN 978-961-6386-51-7 (mobi) 274588160 Kazalo poglavij Kazala Kazalo poglavij ......................................................................................................................... iii Seznam tabel ............................................................................................................................. v Imensko kazalo .......................................................................................................................... I Kazalo političnih strank ........................................................................................................ XV UVODNA POGLAVJA ................................................................................................................. 1 a. Parlament kot teater ............................................................................................................ 3 OSREDNJA POGLAVJA ............................................................................................................ 7 1. Položaj in vloga Državnega zbora ................................................................................... 9 2. Prvo mandatno obdobje – v znamenju tranzicije ....................................................... 15 3. Drugo mandatno obdobje – šibkost velike koalicije .................................................. 27 4. Tretje mandatno obdobje – v znamenju levice .......................................................... 43 5. Četrto mandatno obdobje – v znamenju desnice ...................................................... 55 6. Peto mandatno obdobje – v znamenju krize .............................................................. 67 7. Šesto mandatno obdobje – čas razočaranj in naveličanosti .................................... 81 ZAKLJUČNA POGLAVJA ....................................................................................................... 97 A. Viri ......................................................................................................................................... 99 A.1. Dokumentacijsko-knjižnični oddelek Državnega zbora RS: Dobesedni zapisi sej DZ ........................................................................................................................................ 99 A.2. Viri in literatura ........................................................................................................ 104 Priloge .................................................................................................................................... 113 B.1. Priloga 1 ................................................................................................................... 115 B.2. Priloga 2 ................................................................................................................... 117 B.3. Priloga 3 ................................................................................................................... 121 B.4. Priloga 4 ................................................................................................................... 131 B.5. Priloga 5 ................................................................................................................... 135 B.6. Priloga 6 ................................................................................................................... 137 C. Summary ........................................................................................................................... 157 C.1. History of the National Assembly of the Republic of Slovenia 1992-2014 ........ 157 Slovenski parlament Seznam tabel Skupno število sprejetih parlamentarnih aktov v letih 1997–2000 ................................................ 115 Skupno število sprejetih parlamentarnih aktov v letih 2001–2004 ................................................ 115 Skupno število sprejetih parlamentarnih aktov v letih 2005–2008 ................................................ 115 Skupno število sprejetih parlamentarnih aktov v letih 2008–2011 ................................................ 115 Skupno število sprejetih parlamentarnih aktov v letih 2011-2014 ................................................. 115 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v prvem mandatnem obdobju ....................................................... 117 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v drugem mandatnem obdobju .................................................... 117 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v tretjem mandatnem obdobju ..................................................... 117 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v četrtem mandatnem obdobju .................................................... 118 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v petem mandatnem obdobju ....................................................... 118 Pregled vloženih interpelacij o delu in odgovornosti vlade in njenih ministrov (krepko so označeni ministri, ki jim je bila izglasovana nezaupnica, v ležečem tisku pa tisti, ki so pred odločanjem odstopili) v šestem mandatnem obdobju ..................................................... 118 Delovna telesa državnega zbora v posameznih mandatnih obdobjih ......................................... 132 Število ponovno izvoljenih poslancev po mandatnih obdobjih ...................................................... 135 Poslanci Državnega zbora v I. mandatnem obdobju (1992–1996) ............................................... 137 Poslanci Državnega zbora v II. mandatnem obdobju (1996–2000) .............................................. 140 Poslanci Državnega zbora v III. mandatnem obdobju (2000–2004) ............................................. 143 Poslanci Državnega zbora v IV. mandatnem obdobju (2004–2008) ............................................. 146 Poslanci Državnega zbora v V. mandatnem obdobju (2008−2011) .............................................. 149 Poslanci Državnega zbora v VI. mandatnem obdobju (2011 – 2014) .......................................... 152 Seznam tabel v Jure Gašparič vi Seznam tabel UVODNA POGLAVJA Slovenski parlament Parlament kot teater pog.a. O slovenskem parlamentarizmu pog.a. Parlament ni le osrednje predstavniško in zakonodajno telo v državi s sistemom parlamentarne demokracije, marveč tudi (in zlasti) izrazito politična institucija. Poleg tistih funkcij, ki so jih parlamenti namenili pisci ustave, je hkrati stičišče političnih konceptov, strinjanj in nestrinjanj, zrcalo vsega, kar ljudje pojmujejo pod pojmom politika. Zato ni nenavadno, da so parlamenti vseh vrst pogosto predmet analiz in najrazličnejših raziskav, ki so v sedanjem času vse bolj interdisciplinarne in vse bolj kompleksne. Če so se raziskovalci parlamentov nekoč v glavnem usmerjali v klasične politične analize in zgodovinarske interpretacije, se sedaj vse bolj ozirajo po novih in drugačnih pristopih. Ob trdih in suhih dejstvih so v ospredju antropološki vidiki delovanja parlamenta, jezikovne analize političnega diskurza, analize ustnih virov in obsežne kvantitativne konceptualne analize parlamentarnega govora. Raziskovalci parlamenta ne vidijo več zgolj kot zakonodajalca, vse bolj vidijo teater. Parlament ima tudi širšo družbeno funkcijo, parlament ima nenazadnje tudi kulturno funkcijo. Parlament je javni prostor, ki legitimira, a hkrati izobražuje in zabava. ods.a.1. Morje raziskav parlamentarizma je nedvomno brezbrežno in pričujoče delo ga nikakor nima namena ne načeti ne zamejiti. Nasprotno, njegov temeljni namen je na eni strani ponuditi nepretenciozno ogrodje bodočih raziskav, po drugi strani pa
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Slovenia Before the Elections
    PERSPECTIVE Realignment of the party system – Slovenia before the elections ALEŠ MAVER AND UROŠ URBAS November 2011 The coalition government under Social Democrat Prime make people redundant. Nevertheless, the unemploy- Minister Borut Pahor lost the support it needed in Parlia- ment rate increased by 75 per cent to 107,000 over three ment and early elections had to be called for 4 Decem- years. This policy was financed by loans of 8 billion eu- ber, one year before completing its term of office. What ros, which doubled the public deficit. are the reasons for this development? Which parties are now seeking votes in the »political marketplace«? What However, Prime Minister Pahor overestimated his popu- coalitions are possible after 4 December? And what chal- larity in a situation in which everybody hoped that the lenges will the new government face? economic crisis would soon be over. The governing par- ties had completely different priorities: they were seek- ing economic rents; they could not resist the pressure of Why did the government of lobbies and made concessions; and they were too preoc- Prime Minister Borut Pahor fail? cupied with scandals and other affairs emerging from the ranks of the governing coalition. Although the governing coalition was homogeneously left-wing, it could not work together and registered no significant achievements. The next government will thus Electoral history and development be compelled to achieve something. Due to the deterio- of the party system rating economic situation – for 2012 1 per cent GDP growth, 1.3 per cent inflation, 8.4 per cent unemploy- Since the re-introduction of the multi-party system Slo- ment and a 5.3 per cent budget deficit are predicted – venia has held general elections in 1990, 1992, 1996, the goals will be economic.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election in Slovenia
    GENERAL ELECTIONS IN SLOVENIA 4th December 2011 European Elections monitor The Rightwing Opposition Forces forecast to win in the Slovenian General Elections on from Corinne Deloy translated by Helen Levy 4th December next. ANALYSIS On 4th December next Slovenia will be holding the first early general elections in its history. 1 month before This election follows parliament’s rejection on 20th September last of the confidence motion the poll presented by Borut Pahor’s government (Social Democratic Party, SD). 51 MPs of the Demo- cratic Party (SDS), the People’s Party (SLS), the Slovenian National Party (SNS), Zares (Z) and of the Democratic Pensioners’ Party (DeSUS) voted against the text, 36 members of the Social Democratic Party and of the Liberal Democratic Party (LDS) as well as three independent MPs voted in support. The Slovenian Parliament was dissolved on 21st October. Borut Pahor is the third Slovenian head of government to fall after Alojz Peterle (Slovenian Christian-Democrats) in 1992 and Janez Drnovsek (LDS) in 2000. After the announcement of the government’s collapse, President of the Republic, Danilo Türk left New York where he was attending the UN’s General Assembly to return to Ljubljana. “The vote of defiance has worsened the political crisis,” he declared, calling on all political parties to show courage rapidly in order to find solutions to the crisis in the interest of the Slovenian people. “The vote of defiance is good news because it will lead to a new government that will have wider public support, which is vital if the necessary decisions are to be taken,” declared Janez Sustarsic, professor at the Faculty of Management in Koper.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloads/Europas-Vergessene-Krise-P4417.H Tml
    VOLUME 10, NUMBER 1, JANUARY 2017 COHESIVE EUROPE OR CORE-PERIPHERY DIVIDE IN THE EU28: THE REGIONAL CHALLENGE OF DUAL CRISIS IN THE NEW MEMBER STATES Attila AGH ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… POLITICAL LEADERSHIP IN TIMES OF CRISES – THEORIES AND MODELS WORTHY FOR OUR CHANGING WORLD Aleksandar DIMITROV ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... ELECTRONIC VOTING IN COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE: STATUS QUO IN ESTONIA AND TRENDS IN CENTRAL EUROPE Markus REINERS ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... PARLIAMENTARY LEADERSHIP – PROBLEMS, DILEMMAS AND OPPORTUNITIES OF LEGISLATIVE LEADERS: THE CASE OF SLOVENIA Drago ZAJC ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... COMMUNAL POLITICAL MOBILIZATION: THE NEED TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN MINORITY AND MAJORITY PARTIES Agnes K. KOOS and Kenneth KEULMAN ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... BOOK REVIEW: “FROZEN CONFLICTS” IN EUROPE Jerzy J. WIATR ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………... JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE POLITICS 2 EDITORIAL TEAM General Editor General Editor Miro Haček Peter Csányi ................................................................. ................................................................ University of Ljubljana Alexander Dubč ek University Trenčin Faculty of social sciences, CAAPPI Department of Political Science Kardeljeva ploščad 5 Študentská 2 1000 Ljub ljana , S lovenia 911 50 Trenčin, Slovakia [email protected] [email protected] General Editor Assistant Editor Jurij Toplak Simona Kukovič .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia On
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND LEGAL AFFAIRS DIRECTORATE OF MONITORING Strasbourg, 7 December 2007 Public Greco Eval III Rep (2007) 1E Theme II Third Evaluation Round Evaluation Report on Slovenia on Transparency of Party Funding (Theme II) Adopted by GRECO at its 35 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 3-7 December 2007) Secrétariat du GRECO GRECO Secretariat www.coe.int/greco Conseil de l’Europe Council of Europe F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex +33 3 88 41 20 00 Fax +33 3 88 41 39 55 I. INTRODUCTION 1. Slovenia joined GRECO in 1999. GRECO adopted the First Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval I Rep (2000) 3E) in respect of Slovenia at its 4 th Plenary Meeting (12-15 December 2000) and the Second Round Evaluation Report (Greco Eval II Rep (2003) 1E) at its 16 th Plenary Meeting (Strasbourg, 8-12 December 2003). The aforementioned Evaluation Reports, as well as their corresponding Compliance Reports, are available on GRECO’s homepage (http://www.coe.int/greco ). 2. GRECO’s current Third Evaluation Round (launched on 1 January 2007) deals with the following themes: - Theme I – Incriminations: Articles 1a and 1b, 2-12, 15-17, 19 paragraph 1 of the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption (ETS 173) 1, Articles 1-6 of its Additional Protocol 2 (ETS 191) and Guiding Principle 2 (criminalisation of corruption). - Theme II – Transparency of party funding: Articles 11, 12, 13b, 14 and 16 of Recommendation Rec(2003)4 on Common Rules against Corruption in the Funding of Political Parties and Electoral Campaigns, and - more generally - Guiding Principle 15 (financing of political parties and election campaigns) .
    [Show full text]
  • Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: from Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? Debateu Jean Monnet
    DebatEU Jean Monnet paper No 2020/01 Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? DebatEU Jean Monnet Paper No 2020/01 May 2020 URL: jmce-ljubljana.eu To cite this article: Lajh, D., & Novak, M. (2020). Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? DebatEU Jean Monnet Paper, 2020/01. JEAN MONNET PAPERS publishes pre-print manuscript on the policymaking process and policy studies in Europe. The series is interdisciplinary in character and accept papers in the field of political science, international relations, European studies, sociology, law and similar. It publishes work of theoretical, conceptual as well as of empirical character and it also encourages submissions of policy-relevant analyses, including specific policy recommendations. Papers are available in electronic format only and can be downloaded in pdf-format at jmce- ljubljana.eu. Issued by University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Social Sciences Kardeljeva ploščad 5 1000 Ljubljana Email: [email protected] Tel: +386 1 5805 227 Fax: +386 1 5805 103 www.fdv.uni-lj.si This publication has been co-funded with support from Erusmus+ Programme of the European Union. This publication [communication] reflects the views only of the authors, and the European Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. 1 DebatEU Jean Monnet paper No 2020/01 Slovenian Bubble in the Brussels: From Best Student in Class to Passive Observer? Damjan Lajh and Meta Novak Abstract: With dissolution of socialist Yugoslavia Slovenia turned towards the European Union (EU) membership.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Populism in Europe
    2018 State of Populism in Europe The past few years have seen a surge in the public support of populist, Eurosceptical and radical parties throughout almost the entire European Union. In several countries, their popularity matches or even exceeds the level of public support of the centre-left. Even though the centre-left parties, think tanks and researchers are aware of this challenge, there is still more OF POPULISM IN EUROPE – 2018 STATE that could be done in this fi eld. There is occasional research on individual populist parties in some countries, but there is no regular overview – updated every year – how the popularity of populist parties changes in the EU Member States, where new parties appear and old ones disappear. That is the reason why FEPS and Policy Solutions have launched this series of yearbooks, entitled “State of Populism in Europe”. *** FEPS is the fi rst progressive political foundation established at the European level. Created in 2007 and co-fi nanced by the European Parliament, it aims at establishing an intellectual crossroad between social democracy and the European project. Policy Solutions is a progressive political research institute based in Budapest. Among the pre-eminent areas of its research are the investigation of how the quality of democracy evolves, the analysis of factors driving populism, and election research. Contributors : Tamás BOROS, Maria FREITAS, Gergely LAKI, Ernst STETTER STATE OF POPULISM Tamás BOROS IN EUROPE Maria FREITAS • This book is edited by FEPS with the fi nancial support of the European
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Slovenia
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE The Far Right in Slovenia Master‟s thesis Bc. Lucie Chládková Supervisor: doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D. UČO: 333105 Field of Study: Security and Strategic Studies Matriculation Year: 2012 Brno 2014 Declaration of authorship of the thesis Hereby I confirm that this master‟s thesis “The Far Right in Slovenia” is an outcome of my own elaboration and work and I used only sources here mentioned. Brno, 10 May 2014 ……………………………………… Lucie Chládková 2 Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to doc. JUDr. PhDr. Miroslav Mareš, Ph.D., who supervised this thesis and contributed with a lot of valuable remarks and advice. I would like to also thank to all respondents from interviews for their help and information they shared with me. 3 Annotation This master‟s thesis deals with the far right in Slovenia after 1991 until today. The main aim of this case study is the description and analysis of far-right political parties, informal and formal organisations and subcultures. Special emphasis is put on the organisational structure of the far-right scene and on the ideological affiliation of individual far-right organisations. Keywords far right, Slovenia, political party, organisation, ideology, nationalism, extremism, Blood and Honour, patriotic, neo-Nazi, populism. 4 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 7 2. Methodology .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Guide Euroscepticism
    Information Guide Euroscepticism A guide to information sources on Euroscepticism, with hyperlinks to further sources of information within European Sources Online and on external websites Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 2 Brief Historical Overview................................................................................. 2 Euro Crisis 2008 ............................................................................................ 3 European Elections 2014 ................................................................................ 5 Euroscepticism in Europe ................................................................................ 8 Eurosceptic organisations ......................................................................... 10 Eurosceptic thinktanks ............................................................................. 10 Transnational Eurosceptic parties and political groups .................................. 11 Eurocritical media ................................................................................... 12 EU Reaction ................................................................................................. 13 Information sources in the ESO database ........................................................ 14 Further information sources on the internet ..................................................... 14 Copyright © 2016 Cardiff EDC. All rights reserved. 1 Cardiff EDC is part of the University Library
    [Show full text]
  • Slovenian Democratic Path After European Union Accession
    The Difficult Look Back: Slovenian Democratic Path after European Union Accession MIRO HAČEK Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 15, No. 3 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2019-0023 Abstract: In the third wave of democratic changes in the early 1990s when the Central and Eastern European (CEE) political landscape changed radically and the democrati‑ sation processes started in the eastern part of the continent, Slovenia was one of the most prominent countries with the best prospects for rapid democratic growth. Slove‑ nia somewhat luckily escaped the Yugoslav civil wars and towards the end of the 20th century was already on the path towards a stable and consolidated democracy with the most successful economy in the entire CEE area. After the dissolution of Yugoslavia, Slovenia had a simple and straight ‑forward political goals, i.e. to join the European union as soon as possible, thus consolidating its place among the most developed countries within the region. After some setbacks, this goal was accomplished in (so far) the biggest enlargement to the Union in May 2004. But what happened after Slovenia managed to successfully achieve its pair of major political goals? In this chapter, we search for an answer to this question and find out why Slovenian voters are increas‑ ingly distrustful not only of political institutions, but why so ‑called new political faces and instant political parties are so successful and why Slovenian democracy has lost a leading place among consolidated democracies in CEE. Keywords: Slovenia; European Union; membership; distrust; democracy. Introduction After declaring its independence from former Yugoslavia in 1991, the Republic of Slovenia expressed its willingness and objective, both in its strategic develop‑ ment documents and at the highest political levels, to become a full member of POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 15 (2019) 3 419 the European Union (EU).1 As the crucial developmental documents2 indicate, the optimum long ‑term development of the Slovenian economy is inextricably tied to Slovenia’s full membership in the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Strenghtening European Social Democracy
    Brochure_roundtable_sd_EN:Mise en page 1 11/5/10 5:41 PM Page 1 STRENGTHENING EUROPEAN SOCIAL S&D GROUP ROUND TABLE DEBATES DEMOCRACY MAY & JUNE 2010 Brochure_roundtable_sd_EN:Mise en page 1 11/5/10 5:41 PM Page 2 PARTICIPANTS Juan Fernando López Aguilar Head of Delegation Spain Kader Arif Coordinator S&D Group France Henning Meyer Social Europe journal Germany Kriton Arsenis MEP Greece Miguel Ángel Martínez Martínez EP Vice-President Spain Maria Badia I Cutchet S&D Group Vice-President Spain Kyriakos Mavronikolas Head of Delegation Cyprus Thijs Berman Head of Delegation Netherlands Jelena Milinovic S&D Trainee Serbia Janna Besamusca Ecosy Secretary General Netherlands Alexander Mirsky Head of Delegation Latvia Antony Beumer S&D Group Secretariat Netherlands Javier Moreno GPF Secretary General Spain Henrik Bokor Facebook debate Sweden Anne Muxel Academic Speaker France David Capezzuto PES secretariat Italy Katarina Nevedalová MEP Slovakia Anna Colombo S&D Group Secr. General Italy Justas Vincas Paleckis Head of Delegation Lithuania Philip Cordery PES Secretary General France Ivari Padar Head of Delegation Estonia Massimo D’Alema FEPS President/speaker Italy Jan Pronk Professor/Speaker Netherlands Vasilica Viorica Dăncilă Head of Delegation Romania Kévin Pusieux Facebook debate France Jacki Davis Moderator UK Bernhard Rapkay Head of Delegation Germany Véronique De Keyser S&D Group Vice-President Belgium Poul Nyrup Rasmussen PES Pres./Speaker Denmark Proinsias De Rossa Head of Delegation Ireland Maria Joao Rodrigues PES special advisor Portugal Saîd El Khadraoui MEP Belgium Libor Roucek EP Vice-President Czech Rep. Edite Estrela Head of Delegation Portugal David-Maria Sassoli Head of Delegation Italy Monika Flašíková Beňová S&D Group Vice-President Slovakia Martin Schulz S&D Group President Germany Krisztian Gal Facebook debate Hungary Adrian Severin S&D Group Vice-Pres.
    [Show full text]
  • Ust Spr I.Vp:Corelventura
    REPUBLIKA SLOVENIJA DR@AVNI ZBOR USTAVNE RAZPRAVE 1996 – 1997 Izbor gradiv Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije I. knjiga Ljubljana, 2004 USTAVNE RAZPRAVE 1996-1997 Izbor gradiv Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije I. knjiga Uredniki: dr. Miro Cerar dr. Ale{ Novak Boris Vri{er Sodelavca urednikov: Primo` Gorki~ Gregor Jagodi~ Pri urejanju gradiva sta sodelovali: Natalija Muhi~ Sabahat Krasni~i Ljubljana, 2004 CIP - Katalo`ni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knji`nica, Ljubljana 342:342.53(497.4)"1996/1997" SLOVENIJA. Dr`avni zbor Ustavne razprave : izbor gradiv Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije / uredniki Miro Cerar, Ale{ Novak, Boris Vri{er. - Ljubljana : Dr`avni zbor Republike Slovenije, 2004- Knj. 1:1996-1997. - 2004 ISBN 961-6415-10-7 (knj. 1) 1. Gl. stv. nasl. 2. Cerar, Miro, 1963- 3. Vri{er, Boris 216136448 Zbornik "Ustavne razprave: izbor gradiv Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije" sodi v knji`no zbirko Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije, ki jo izdaja Slu`ba za odnose z javnostmi. Urednik zbirke: mag. Du{an Benko Uredniki zbornika: dr. Miro Cerar, dr. Ale{ Novak in Boris Vri{er Naslov zbornika: Ustavne razprave: izbor gradiv Dr`avnega zbora Republike Slovenije Naslov izdajatelja: Dr`avni zbor Republike Slovenije, Ljubljana, [ubi~eva 4 Telefon: +386 1 478 94 00 Produkcija: Slu`ba za odnose z javnostmi Oblikovanje in priprava za tisk: Multigraf, d.o.o. Tisk: Tiskarna Dr`avnega zbora RS Naklada: 600 izvodov Zbornik lahko poi{~ete tudi na elektronskem naslovu: www.dz-rs.si VSEBINA Uvod 5 Uredni{ko pojasnilo 7 PREDLOG ZA ZA^ETEK POSTOPKA ZA SPREMEMBO USTAVE REPUBLIKE SLOVENIJE 9 Predlog ve~ kot 40.000 volivk in volivcev za za~etek postopka za spremembo ustave (Za odpoklic poslanca) 11 STALI[^A IN MNENJA 13 Mnenje vlade k predlogu za za~etek postopka za spremembo prvega odstavka 82.
    [Show full text]
  • Powerpointova Predstavitev
    SIMBIOZA INTERNATIONAL ŽIGA, WHAT IS WWW? It started with a simple question of Žiga’s grandmother: “What is www?” Wake-up call for Slovenia: 94 % of people over the age of 65 has never touched a computer (2010). What to do? Ypsilon Institute was searching for answers to these questions… Žiga and his grandmother at Simbioza workshops SIMBIOZA …and so Simbioza was born – a nationwide volunteer project of intergenerational cooperation in connection with e-literacy. For one week the young became teachers and the elder became students = receipe for symbiosis (simbioza in Slovene). VALUES AND GOALS – Promote lifelong learning and active ageing and in this regard enable the elderly community to acquire the much needed basic computer skills, so to improve the e-literacy of the target population; – raising awareness and reaffirm faith and importance in volunteering and solidarity among the younger generations; – and by such means, make an important contribution towards improving the intergenerational dialogue and social inclusion of the elderly. AWARDS European Citizen Award, conferred by the European Parliament in 2012 for Simbioza 2011; Award for the title “Volunteer of the Year” in 2012 for Simbioza 2011, conferred by the National Youth Council of Slovenia (under the patronage of Dr. Danilo Türk, former President of the Republic of Slovenia); Award for Innovations in 2011 in Central Slovenian region (silver award), conferred by the Slovenian Chamber of Commerce in 2012 for Simbioza 2011; State youth sector award in 2013; European award for socially responsible entrepreneurship practices for partnership, innovations, and change conferred by CSR Europe and Business in the Community (BITC) in 2013 for Simbioza 2012; Award for social inclusion, conferred by Erste Foundation in 2013 Nomination by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Republic of Slovenia for United Nations Population Award 2014.
    [Show full text]