Analysis of Breach Characteristics and Equilibrium Scour Title Pattern for Overtopping Induced River Dyke Breach
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
CBD Fifth National Report
Fifth National Report of Japan to the Convention on Biological Diversity Government of Japan March 2014 Contents Executive Summary 1 Chapter 1 Biodiversity: the current situation, trends and threats 7 1.1 Importance of biodiversity 7 (1) Characteristics of biodiversity in Japan from the global perspective 7 (2) Biodiversity that supports life and livelihoods 9 (3) Japan causing impacts on global biodiversity 10 (4) The economic valuation of biodiversity 11 1.2 Major changes to the biodiversity situation and trends 12 (1) The current situation of ecosystems 12 (2) The current situation of threatened wildlife 17 (3) Impacts of the Great East Japan Earthquake on biodiversity 19 1.3 The structure of the biodiversity crisis 21 (1) The four crises of biodiversity 21 (2) Japan Biodiversity Outlook (JBO) 22 1.4 The impacts of changes in biodiversity on ecosystem services, socio-economy, and culture 24 (1) Changes in the distribution of medium and large mammals and the expansion of conflicts 24 (2) Alien species 24 (3) Impacts of changes in the global environment on biodiversity 26 1.5 Future scenarios for biodiversity 28 (1) Impacts of the global warming 28 (2) The impacts of ocean acidification on coral reefs 29 (3) The forecasted expansion in the distribution of sika deer (Cervus nippon ) 30 (4) Second crisis (caused by reduced human activities) 30 Chapter 2 Implementation of the National Biodiversity Strategy and Mainstreaming Biodiversity 32 2.1 Background to the formulation of the National Biodiversity Strategy of Japan and its development -
Flood Loss Model Model
GIROJ FloodGIROJ Loss Flood Loss Model Model General Insurance Rating Organization of Japan 2 Overview of Our Flood Loss Model GIROJ flood loss model includes three sub-models. Floods Modelling Estimate the loss using a flood simulation for calculating Riverine flooding*1 flooded areas and flood levels Less frequent (River Flood Engineering Model) and large- scale disasters Estimate the loss using a storm surge flood simulation for Storm surge*2 calculating flooded areas and flood levels (Storm Surge Flood Engineering Model) Estimate the loss using a statistical method for estimating the Ordinarily Other precipitation probability distribution of the number of affected buildings and occurring disasters related events loss ratio (Statistical Flood Model) *1 Floods that occur when water overflows a river bank or a river bank is breached. *2 Floods that occur when water overflows a bank or a bank is breached due to an approaching typhoon or large low-pressure system and a resulting rise in sea level in coastal region. 3 Overview of River Flood Engineering Model 1. Estimate Flooded Areas and Flood Levels Set rainfall data Flood simulation Calculate flooded areas and flood levels 2. Estimate Losses Calculate the loss ratio for each district per town Estimate losses 4 River Flood Engineering Model: Estimate targets Estimate targets are 109 Class A rivers. 【Hokkaido region】 Teshio River, Shokotsu River, Yubetsu River, Tokoro River, 【Hokuriku region】 Abashiri River, Rumoi River, Arakawa River, Agano River, Ishikari River, Shiribetsu River, Shinano -
Geographical Variations in Morphological Characters of the Fluvial Eight-Barbel Loach, Nagare-Hotoke-Dojo (Cobitidae: Nemacheilinae)
Biogeography 17. 43–52. Sep. 20, 2015 Geographical variations in morphological characters of the fluvial eight-barbel loach, Nagare-hotoke-dojo (Cobitidae: Nemacheilinae) Taiki Ito*, Kazuhiro Tanaka and Kazumi Hosoya Program in Environmental Management, Graduate School of Agriculture, Kinki University, 3327-204 Nakamachi, Nara 631-8505, Japan Abstract. The morphological and color variations of Lefua sp. 1 Nagare-hotoke-dojo individuals from 13 river systems were examined. Analysis of variance revealed highly significant variations in Lefua sp. 1 mor- phology and coloration among the 13 populations examined, across all 19 measurements and counts. The 13 populations of Lefua sp. 1 were classified into two major clusters (I and II) by using UPGMA cluster analy- sis. Cluster I comprised fish from the Maruyama, Yura, Muko, Mihara, Yoshino, Hidaka, Kumano, Yoshii, Chikusa, and Ibo river systems. Cluster II comprised fish from the Yoshida, Saita, and Sumoto river systems. Cluster I was further subdivided into sub-clusters: I-i (the Maruyama, Yura, Muko, Mihara, Yoshino, Hidaka, Kumano, and Yoshii river systems) and I-ii (the Chikusa and Ibo river systems). Principal component analysis revealed that populations within cluster II clearly possessed longer caudal peduncles, while populations within cluster I possessed a longer anterior body on average and a deeper body. Populations within sub-cluster I-ii possessed a higher average dorsal fin and a longer average dorsal fin base than those of populations within sub-cluster I-i. A strong correlation was noted between the PC3 score and population latitude (r = 0.621). Observations of body color patterns revealed that individuals from the Yoshino, Mihara, Sumoto, and Hidaka river systems had dark brown mottling on both sides and the dorsal regions of their bodies and many small dark brown spots on the dorsal and caudal fins, while those from the Yura, Muko, and Kumano river systems possessed neither. -
RADIOACTIVITY SURVEY DATA in Japan
RADIOACTIV SURVEY D」A ln Al)ri11963,in compli seLforthbytheJapanAtomi the Division oE Radioactiv Institute ofRadiologicalSci( 1.Collect,rCCOrd and on radiation from Natiorl 2.Analyze theinform之】 3.Establish a radiatior exchange center. As a p;lrt Of thc asく thc Nationwidc R;ldioactiv Were aSSClnbled an〔1coll叩il Prcscntl)1ans are toissuet On a quarterly basis. For furtherinformatioI POrtedin thisissue,rCadcr5 COntributorsindicatedin th RadioactivitySurveyDa inJapan Number 4 AⅦguSt1964 Comtents Page MeteorogictlData I)ieta Strontium-90and Cesium-137in Rain andDry Strontium-90and Cesiu] Fallout(Jbpan AnalyticalChemistry (肋如彿αZ血βま宜紬fβ Rβgβαγ¢九九β招%fβ)………………….1 ぶ¢宜β%¢ββ)‥.‥‥‥. (九pα≠A≠α‡〃抽αZ( GeograpbicalData ∫九βf宜紬fβ)‥.‥.‥‥ Strontium-90and Cesium-137in Soil Strontium-90and Cesiul (抽出0耽α£∫朋f宜f≠fβげ月αd宜0~og宜¢α乙 (九pα彿A≠α如£¢αい ぶβ£β≠¢ββ)‥.‥‥‥‥.‥‥‥‥‥.‥‥‥ J九β£宜紬fβ)‥‥‥‥‥ (九pα彿A≠α‡〃士官¢αZC九β刑由fγyRβg紺γ¢九 (乃αγαg宜Pγ小β£≠γβ 力ほ抽加ゎ)…………………………‥ 7 Strontium-90and Cesiu] Water Data (九pαれA%α如ま¢αヱ・ Strontium-90and Cesium-137in City Water ∫れβf宜ねfβ)‥‥.‥‥. (抽出0≠α~∫≠βま宜ねまβq′Rαd宜0わgieα£ Strontium-90andCesiuI ぶ¢宜β竹βββ).‥‥‥‥‥‥.‥‥‥‥‥.‥.‥ (tねpα雅Aれα如宜eα‡・ (九pα≠A≠αZyfま¢α乙C九β例言8fγyRβββαγC九 ∫那f宜f髄fβ).‥‥‥‥. ● MeteorologlCalData Strontium-90and Cesium-137in Rain and Dry Fallout (九pα彿A≠α如宜¢α‡C九β例言β£γ財月βββαγC九∫れβ£加古β) SinceMay1963,theJapanAnalyticalChemistry StrOntium and cesium c王 ResearchInstitute,On COmmission bytheScience COlumn fi11ed with sodil] andTechnologyAgency,hasmeasuredstrontium-90 resin(Dowex 50W-Ⅹ8, and cesium-137 contentin monthly deposits at COlumn was sent totheJ VariouslocationsthroughoutJapan.Samplingand ResearchInstitute for m. for Pre-treatment concentration have been carried used wasillustratedin Outby24prefecturalpublic healthlaboratories. this publication. The tray recommended by the Science and After a fraction conl TechnologyAgencyhasacollectionareaof5,000cm2, and cesium-137was elut( to andis exposed rain and dust throughout the ChemicalanalysIS WaS Ca二 depth month・The of waterin the trayiskept recommendedbytheScien to atlOmm preventdust from beingblown away. -
Rainfall in Japan
SAKURA SCIENCE Exchange Program Contents Sakura Science Plan Dec. 9th, 2019 Brief Introduction of Recent Flood Disasters in Japan Recent Flood Disasters in Japan Flood Disasters in 2004 River Bank Breach at the Asuwa River River Bank Breach at the Maruyama River Prof. & Dr. Hajime NAKAGAWA [email protected] Hydroscience and Hydraulic Engineering Disaster Prevention Research Institute, Kyoto University 01 02 Brief Introduction of Recent Flood Rainfall in Japan Disasters in Japan One year (mean) 1,714 mm One day (max.) & 1,317 mm (Tokushima, 2004) 24 hours (max.) One hour (max.) 187 mm (Nagasaki, 1982) Ten minute 49mm (Kochi, 1946) (max.) 03 04 (Person) Death Toll due to Natural Disasters in Japan 6500 19,486 Recent Major Flood Disasters in Japan the rest (from 1998 onwards) Snow related 6400 6482 Volcanic 2016 flood disaster by Typhoon Earthquake 1607, 09, 10, 11 in Hokkaido Flood, wind 2010 flood disaster due to heavy 2003 flood disaster Japan Territory: rainfall in Hokkaido by Typhoon0310 in Hokkaido 2019 Flood & strong wind Disasters 2 2012,2013,2014 flood disaster due to 380,000 km heavy rainfall (Kyoto), 2018 storm caused by Typhoons 15 & 19 10 Typhoons surge & strong wind disaster in Osaka 2011 Tsunami disaster due to Tohoku 500 10% :Alluvial plains landed earthquake 438 2004, 2011 flood disaster 50% :Population in Hokuriku area 1998 flood disaster in Fukushima, Tochigi and Ibaragi 400 75% :Property 2004 flood disaster by Typhoon0423 327 2008 flood disaster by 2015 flood disaster in the Kinu River basin 300 heavy -
Chapter 8. Creating and Preserving a Beautiful and Healthy Environment
Section 1 Promoting Global Warming Countermeasures Creating and Preserving a Beautiful II Chapter 8 Chapter 8 and Healthy Environment Section 1 Promoting Global Warming Countermeasures a Beautiful and Healthy Environment and Preserving Creating 1 Implementing Global Warming Countermeasures At the 21st session of the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP21) held in 2015, the Paris Agreement was adopted as a new international framework for reducing greenhouse gas emissions be- ginning in 2020, with participation by all countries. The agreement went into effect in November 2016, and Japan is a signatory nation. Based on the Paris Agreement, Japan adopted the Plan for Global Warming Countermeasures by a Cabinet decision in May 2016, and has committed to efforts toward the achievement of the mid-term objective to achieve a 26.0% decrease in the FY2013 level of greenhouse gases by FY2030, and as a long-term objective aims to reduce emissions 80% by 2050. The MLIT has committed to a wide array of policy development initiatives for achieving the mid-term objective based on this plan, including making housing and buildings more energy efficient, measures for individual vehicles, and the promotion of low-carbon urban development. In addition, we partially amended our Environmental Action Plan in March 2017, and set out long-term roles for the MLIT in mitigation policies and other environmental policies. In March 2018, the Bill to Partially Amend the Act Concerning the Rational Use of Energy, which includes provisions for certifying energy-saving efforts through the collaboration of multiple transportation operators and allowing corpo- rations to allocate energy-saving credits amongst one another and report regularly, was submitted to the National Diet. -
Mitigation of Flood Hazards in Japan
River Basin Management IV 271 Mitigation of flood hazards in Japan M. Takezawa1, H. Gotoh1 & Y. Takeuchi2 1Nihon University, Tokyo, Japan 2Japan Infrastructure Partners Abstract In recent years, there have been instances of unusually heavy rain in Japan, including rainfall in excess of 200 mm/day. The aim of flood-control planning in Japan since 1945 has been to confine river water to within riverbanks and to ensure that levees protect river basins from flooding. In many rivers, dams were constructed in upstream areas and long levees were built along the riverbanks. The main aim of flood-control planning is to prevent the flooding of river basins by the over-flow of river water across riverbanks; however, as rainfall prediction has recently become difficult because of the effects of global warming, the main emphasis of flood-control planning has shifted from prevention to providing areas of refuge. Flood hazards must be dealt with by ‘hard measures’ such as levees and reservoirs, and ‘soft measures’ such as the provision of hydrological information, regulation of land use, and evacuation advice. In 2001, the Japanese Government made it mandatory for all regional bodies to compile and distribute flood-hazard maps to inform inhabitants of the danger of flooding and the locations of sites of refuge for all inhabitants. It is difficult to provide residents with complete protection from flooding hazards. Many people in Japan live alongside rivers, and Japanese culture has long encompassed wet-rice cultivation. Communities have always lived under the threat of flooding, but the profitability of river water makes it preferable to live close to a river even if flooding occurs at times of heavy rain. -
Low Genetic Diversities in Isolated Populations of the Asian Black Bear (Ursus Thibetanus) in Japan, in Comparison with Large Stable Populations
Conserv Genet (2007) 8:1331–1337 DOI 10.1007/s10592-006-9281-z ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Low genetic diversities in isolated populations of the Asian black bear (Ursus thibetanus) in Japan, in comparison with large stable populations Naoki Ohnishi Æ Takashi Saitoh Æ Yasuyuki Ishibashi Æ Toru Oi Received: 14 July 2006 / Accepted: 24 December 2006 / Published online: 2 March 2007 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract Populations of the Asian black bear (Ursus suggested genetic drift due to the small population size; thibetanus) are relatively large and continuous in cen- the genetic differentiation among the populations tral Honshu, the main island of Japan, but they are indicated low rates of gene flow among them. isolated in western Honshu. To clarify the degree of genetic isolation of the populations in western Honshu, Keywords Microsatellite DNA Á Habitat we compared the genetic diversities of four popula- fragmentation Á Genetic drift Á Heterozygosity Á tions in western Honshu with that of one of the con- Gene flow tinuous populations of central Honshu. Three of the four western Honshu populations were isolated and the other was continuous with the central Honshu popu- Introduction lations on a geographical distribution basis. The genotypes at 10 microsatellite loci of the sampled The Asian black bear Ursus thibetanus (G. Cuvier, individuals were determined and the genetic structures 1823) inhabits two main islands, Honshu and Shikoku, of the populations examined. Genetic diversities were in Japan (Fig. 1). The distribution of the bear is con- significantly lower in the isolated populations than in tinuous from eastern to central Honshu, except in the the continuous populations. -
Arao-Higata 鳥栖 I.C 日田 I.C 湯布院 I.C 佐賀大和 I.C 久留米 I.C 別府 I.C the Guide Book to Arao-Higata, Ramsar Site
門司 I.C 九 州 Ramsar Site 自 動 車 道 Fukuoka Airport Hakata St. 太宰府 I.C Arao-higata 鳥栖 I.C 日田 I.C 湯布院 I.C 佐賀大和 I.C 久留米 I.C 別府 I.C The Guide Book to Arao-higata, Ramsar Site 佐世保 I.C 武雄 I.C 八女 I.C 新大牟田駅 Saga Airport Nankan I.C 津久見 I.C Arao St. Kikusui I.C 新玉名駅 諫早 I.C KUMAMOTO 長崎 I.C 有明フェリー 熊本 I.C Kumamoto St. Aso-Kumamoto Airport 島原 新八代駅 Arao City, 鹿 八代 I.C 児 Kumamoto Pref. 島 本 線 芦北 I.C えびの I.C 九 州 新 宮崎 I.C 幹 都城 I.C 線 鹿児島中央駅 鹿児島 I.C Protect and nurture our rich treasure sea and the life of Arao-higata for the future 頴娃 I.C It’s a great expanse of tidal flat in the Sea of Ariake Tasty clams and laver are harvested from this tidal flat Migratory birds, shellfish, lugworms, a diversity of life Living side by side with the fertile tidal flat are the people who nurture the life in the tidal flat, who enjoy mud shrimp fishing during summer The Ramsar site, Arao-higata is our asset recognized by the World indeed Published by Kyushu Regional Environmental Offce, Ministry of the Environment, Japan. Outline of Arao-higata Arao-higata—a tidal fat that represents the Sea of Ariake The Sea of Ariake located in Kumamoto Prefecture, Japan, accounts for around 40% of the total tidal fat area of Japan. The ex- tensive tidal fats in the Sea of Ariake were formed by large volumes of sediment carried by Japan’s largest tidal fow and a vertical tid- al range of 6 meters. -
Appendix (PDF:4.3MB)
APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS: APPENDIX 1. Overview of Japan’s National Land Fig. A-1 Worldwide Hypocenter Distribution (for Magnitude 6 and Higher Earthquakes) and Plate Boundaries ..................................................................................................... 1 Fig. A-2 Distribution of Volcanoes Worldwide ............................................................................ 1 Fig. A-3 Subduction Zone Earthquake Areas and Major Active Faults in Japan .......................... 2 Fig. A-4 Distribution of Active Volcanoes in Japan ...................................................................... 4 2. Disasters in Japan Fig. A-5 Major Earthquake Damage in Japan (Since the Meiji Period) ....................................... 5 Fig. A-6 Major Natural Disasters in Japan Since 1945 ................................................................. 6 Fig. A-7 Number of Fatalities and Missing Persons Due to Natural Disasters ............................. 8 Fig. A-8 Breakdown of the Number of Fatalities and Missing Persons Due to Natural Disasters ......................................................................................................................... 9 Fig. A-9 Recent Major Natural Disasters (Since the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake) ............ 10 Fig. A-10 Establishment of Extreme Disaster Management Headquarters and Major Disaster Management Headquarters ........................................................................... 21 Fig. A-11 Dispatchment of Government Investigation Teams (Since -
River Basin Management Toward Nature Restoration ~ Case of Ise Bay River Basin ~
Development of Eco-Compatible River Basin Management toward Nature Restoration ~ Case of Ise bay River Basin ~ Yuji Toda and Tetsuro Tsujimoto Nagoya University Nature Restoration Projects of Japanese Rivers (2006) Shibetsu River Ishikari River Kushiro River Maruyama River Iwaki River Akagawa River Mukawa River Shinano River Matsuura River Jinzu River Mabechi River Tone River Tenjin River Ara River Go-no River Tama River Turumi River Kano River Tenryu River Toyo River YahagiRiver KisoRiver Yamato River Yodo River Kako River Ibo River Yoshii River Shigenobu River Shimanto River Gokase River Kikuchi River Restoration of Riparian Wetland by Flood Re-meandering (Kushiro River) Plain Excavation (Matsuura River) Restoration of Tidal Mud Flats (Mu River) Restoration of Sediment Continuity along River (Image: from Pamphlet of Nature Restoration: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, JAPAN) Mountainous Area Restoration of Forest (Mt. Kunugi) Preservation of Grassland (Mt. Aso) Agricultural Area Coastal Area Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer Preservation of Tidal Mad Flats (Sanban-se) (Image: from Pamphlet of Nature Restoration: Ministry of the Environment, JAPAN) Each Project has own Objective Each project might somewhat contribute the sustainability of our society, but - How can we measure the contribution of each project to sustainability? - How can we design the eco-compatible and sustainable society? Today’s my talk: Introduction of a Joint research project of Ise Bay Eco- Compatible River Basin Research Project (from 2006 -
FY2016 Results of the Radioactive Material Monitoring in the Water Environment
FY2016 Results of the Radioactive Material Monitoring in the Water Environment March 2018 Ministry of the Environment Contents Outline .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Part 1: National Radioactive Material Monitoring in the Water Environment in the Whole of Japan (FY2016) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Objective and Details ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Objective .................................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Details ........................................................................................................................................ 5 2 Survey Methods and Analysis Methods .............................................................................................. 18 2.1 Survey methods ....................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Analysis methods ..................................................................................................................... 19 3 Results ................................................................................................................................................