<<

Polymer Journal, Vol. 32, No. 6, pp 476-480 (2000)

Electrorheological Properties of Phosphoric Ester Cellulose Electrorheological Suspensions at Elevated Temperatures

Byeng-Gil AHN, Ung-Soo CHOI, and Oh-Kwan KWON

Tribology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P. 0. BOX 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130-650, Korea

(Received August 11, 1999)

ABSTRACT: The electrorheological (ER) behavior of suspensions in silicone oil of phosphoric ester cellulose powder (average particle size: 17.77 µm was investigated at elevated temperatures up to 100°C. For development of anhydrous ER suspensions for use at wide temperature range, the effect of temperature on ER activity has studied. Anhydrous ER suspensions were mixed with the phosphoric ester cellulose particles made from the phosphoric ester reactions of cellu­ lose. Durjng increasjng temperature, not only analysis of electrical properties, such as dielectric constant, current den­ sity and electrical conductivity but also rheological properties of ER suspensions were studied. Current density, conduc­ tivity and electrorheological effect ( rA/7:0) of phosphoric ester cellulose ER suspensions showed law dependence on tem­ 2 perature. Shear was closely related to the square of dielectric constant mismatch parameter (/3 ) under constant shear rate and electric field. KEY WORDS Phosphoric Ester Reactions of Cellulose I Dielectric Constant Mismatch Parameter I Anhydrous Electrorheological Suspension/ Electrorheological Effect I

Fluids which take on the characteristics of solids upon high-voltage generator (HVG 500). application of an electric field are known as electrorheo­ logical (ER) suspensions. Dramatic rheological effects EXPERIMENTAL are reversible and in most quite fast (~1 ms). They were first discovered by Winslow in the early Design ofAnhydrous ER Suspensions 1940's and the phenomenon sometimes bears his name, Synthesis of Phosphoric Ester Cellulose Particles. Winslow effect.1 These suspensions generally consist of Aqueous solutions at 2.5 mol of phosphoric acid (85% or­ micron or submicron particles dispersed in a dielectric thophosphoric acid) containing 4 mol of urea were . A key to their response lies in the fact that parti­ stirred for half an hour at room temperature for uni­ cles strongly polarize in presence of an electric field. Di­ formity of solution, and ammonium phosphate was gen­ electric mismatch between particles and carrier erated by reaction of phosphoric acid and urea. Raw cel­ gives rise to observed effects.2 lulose particles (Sigmacell, Sigma Chemical Co., average Early developed ER suspensions are mostly wet sys­ particle size 20 µm) were introduced into the ammonium tems, where water plays a specific role in the ER effect. phosphate solution and maintained at 20°C for 24 h. There are a number of theories to explain the function of After 24 h, cellulose particles were separated from am­ water. In most theories, water increases the interfacial monium phosphate solution by filtering and placed in an polarization of the particles by allowing or enhancing electrical furnace for phosphoric ester reactions 7 of cellu­ ionic migration and the formation of polarizable double lose particles. After maintaining 2 h at 80°C, furnace layer. Both theory and practice indicate that moist ER temperature was increased to 150°C and maintained for suspensions are essentially limited to a narrow tempera­ 2 h. The phosphoric ester cellulose particles made from ture range and show undesirable levels of conductivity phosphoric ester reactions of cellulose were neutralized arising from mobile ions.3 by 5~6 washings with distilled water. Since then research on ER suspensions has been done Phosphoric ester cellulose particles was controlled by both theoretically and experimentally. One significant a sieve shaker (passing 26 µm). To remove moisture development in electrorheology is the discovery of an from the particles, they were dried in vacuum oven at anhydrous (dry-base) ER suspension using semi­ 100°C for 48 h. Particle size distribution was measured conducting polymer like polyaniline,4 poly(acene qui­ by Image Analyzer System (Model Omnimet 2, UK), and none) radicals.5 One-phase ER suspension using liquid mean particle size was 17. 77 µm. crystalline polymer was also reported6 and suggests the Preparation of Phosphoric Ester Cellulose ER Suspen­ possibility of resolving problems caused by presence of sions. Dried phosphoric ester cellulose particles were solid particles such as sedimentation of solid particles. mixed with anhydrous silicone oil (50 cS, Shin-Etsu Sili­ The present work examines the electrorheological cone Co., Japan), prepared by exposing the oil to molecu­ properties of anhydrous ER suspensions of phosphoric lar sieves for one week. ER suspensions were made by ester cellulose particles 7 at increasing temperatures up mixing 20 vol% of phosphoric ester cellulose particles to 100°C by studing temperature dependence of ER sus­ and 80 vol% of silicone oil with ball-mill for 24 h for uni­ pension's electrical and rheological properties. Shear form dispersion. stress-shear rate behavior of phosphoric ester cellulose ER suspensions was measured with increase tempera­ ture by a Physica rheolometer (MClO0) connected to a

476 Electrorheological Properties of ER Fluids on Elevated Temperature

Inner electrode(AI)

-- Band _j heater

Outer electrode(AI)

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of electrode for measuring current density and electrical conductivity of ER suspensions at elevated temperature.

Characterization of ER Suspensions Based on Tempera­ ture Figure 2. Schematic diagram of viscometer for ER fluids. 1: ther­ Electrical Measurement at Elevated Temperature. mocouple, 2: thermal liquid-inlet, 3: cable of thermocouple, 4: bot­ tom of measuring cup, 5: packing ring, 6: thermal liquid-outlet, 7: Dielectric and conductive properties of phosphoric ester cover, 8: measuring cup, 9: measuring bob, 10: insulating distance cellulose ER suspensions were measured with variation pins, 11: holding flange, 12: bore for fixing screw M5, 13: plastic in temperature. Arrangement of dispersed particles (i.e., cover, 14: thermal liquid circulation chamber, 15: temperature chain formation) influences the electrical properties of probe of thermocouple, 16: plastic cover, 17: positioning pin for measuring cup. these fluids (Miller and Jones, 1988),8 and thus the fol­ lowing method was used to determine dielectric proper­ ties of ER suspensions. Experiment was performed with ER fluid was initially stirred at E=O, and increased up 1 increasing temperature with a DC bias LCR meter to 4.5 kV mm- . (Hewlett Packard, HP 4263B, U.S.A). Dielectric con­ The equation of current density CJr) is stants were calculated by capacitance9 of ER suspen­ sions. An LCR meter was used with high voltage bias. . Ir 1r=- (3) The equation used was as follows, A

Ks = f Cmeasure - Ca;rl/f Ctheory + 1] (1) The conductivity ( ar) of ER fluids was calculated as, where Ks is dielectric constant of ER suspensions, (4) Cmeasure measuring capacitance of ER suspensions, Cair capacitance of air, and Ctheory theoretical capacitance of free space which can calculate as, where A is electrode area in contact with ER suspension, If current under constant electric field, E electric field (2) and f;.}r the difference of current density of ER suspen­ sion as the difference in electric fields (f;.E). where Ks is the dielectric constant of free space, L cylin­ Dielectric constant of ER suspension calculated by lin­ 8 der gap between bob and cup, and r 2, r 1 inner radius of ear equation of volume fraction of dispersed particles is cup and outer radius of bob, respectively. DC conductiv­ as follows, ity determined by measuring the current on the high electric field conditions. Fluid specimens were held in a (5) heating aluminum cup as seen in Figure 1, whose outer diameter, inner diameter and height were 40 mm, 38 where KP and Kr are the dielectric constant of dispersed mm, and 50 mm, respectively, with a flat bottom made particle and insulating oil, respectively, ¢ the volume by plastic. Electrode area for calculating electrical prop­ fraction of dispersed particle and Ks the dielectric con­ erties was 59.69 cm2 and thickness, 1 mm. When using stant of ER suspension. other polymer particles, poly(p-phenylene), as ER parti­ Rheological behavior of ER suspensions with increas­ cles, the particles aggregated to one electrode under DC ing temperature were determined using Physica rheolo­ fields. But the developed ER particles, phosphoric ester meter (MClO0) as seen in Figure 2, a coaxial arranged cellulose, did not aggregate to one electrode under high design for relatively low strain and strain rate used by a 1 DC fields (up to 4.5 kV mm - ). Data were collected after conventional mechanical test machine. High-voltage

Polym. J., Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000 477 B.-G. AHN, U.-S. CHOI, and O.-K. KwoN

2 1000 Phosphoric acid 2.5 M Electric field (kV/mm) Urea 4 M 2.0 NE 100 cj," = 20 vol% 1.5 Heating rate 10 degree/min u 1 1.0 --s- 10 . 2:- . iii C: log j, a [24.2 - 26.4] log T .--. ID Cl ,, c .. P'" -- 11 ::, 0 /I u 0 1 s:: 1I - Cl 0 0 c;:: iV ...J 0 01 ctl r -

E 100 uj

0 -2 L___.....J__.___JC-L.-L-.....__.~__._.,____,_~_,_.___,_-'---'---'_,._~ 10 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 300 log cr, a [23.9] log T Temperature Cc) Figure 3. DSC curve of phosphoric ester cellulose particles treated with 2.5 mo! of phosphoric acid and 4 mol of urea. 0 1

001 ~------~-----~------,-' 200 Log temperature, T (°K) soo generator (HVG500) was supplied and connected to the cup and bob of Couette type by a thin wire. Figure 4. Current density and conductivity of phosphoric ester Data were obtained with increasing temperature up to cellulose ER suspensions plotted against temperature. 1 100°C at constant shear rate (100 s- ) and electric field. For ER suspensions, the electrorheological effect (ER effect, 7/R or TR, 7/R= T/AfT/o or TR= TAlro) at elevated measured at elevated temperatures. Volume fraction of temperatures is very important for application to real phosphoric ester cellulose particles was maintained con­ mechanical parts, where TIA (or TA) and 7/o (or T0) stand stant, but current density and conductivity should be for the apparent (or shear stress) with and measured differently. Current density Vr ex: rm, m = 24.2 without an electric field under constant temperature, re­ -26.4) and conductivity (ar ex: rn, n =23.9) increased spectively. with temperature, and were proportional to temperature with power law under constant concentration. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The dielectric behavior of 50 cS silicone oil with vari­ ation temperature up to l00°C is shown in Figure 5. The Analysis of Phosphoric Ester Cellulose Particles dielectric constant of silicone oil decreased with increas­ Density measurement of phosphoric ester cellulose ing temperatures. particles was done by a Pycnometer. Density was 1.28± The dielectric behavior of phosphoric ester cellulose 3 0.05 g cm - • Particle size of phosphoric ester cellulose ER suspensions (constant volume fraction) with vari­ particles was controlled by sieve shaker (passing 26 µm ation temperature up to l00°C is shown in Figure 6 at sieve). To remove moisture from the particles, they were constant volume fraction, the dielectric constant of ER dried in the vacuum oven at l00°C for 48 h. Particle size suspensions based on phosphoric ester cellulose parti­ distribution measured by Image Analyzer System cles increased till the temperature arrived at 80°C. But (Model Omnimet 2, UK) and their mean particle size above 80°C, it was nearly constant. For anhydrous ER was 17.77 µm.7 Thermal stability of phosphoric ester cel­ suspensions, shear stress behavior in the electric field is lulose particles was examined from DSC curve up to 200 closely related to the dielectric constant of ER suspen­ °C, as shown in Figure 3. In case of phosphoric ester cel­ sion. This ER behavior named "point dipole mechanism" lulose particles, no chemical reaction or decreasing was proposed by Klingenberg and Zukoski (1990)11 and weight was found below 200°C. Decomposition tempera­ Conrad et al. (1991).8 Assuming two dipoles separated ture of cellulose is between 200°C and 270°C .10 The phos­ more than their radii (a) in suspension, point dipole phoric ester cellulose particles dispersed into silicone oil force (Fd) between two particles may be written as fol­ were thus stable below 200°C, proving that the ER sus­ lows, pensions based on phosphoric ester cellulose are anhy­ drous ER suspensions. (6)

Electrical Properties at Elevated Temperature where p is the dipole moment of dispersed particles, t:0 The continuous phase of a ER suspension is typically a the dielectric constant of free space, and R the distance nonconductive and low dielectric constant oil. The cur­ between two particles. The point dipole force

478 Polym. J., Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000 Electrorheological Properties of ER Fluids on Elevated Temperature

1.0

0.9

0.8

0.7 ~- 3.0 ...;- C Ctl 0.6 en -C 0.5 0 N (.) c::l.. (.) ·;:;: 0.4 (.) 2.5 -Q) Q) 0.3 0 0.2

0.1

20 ~~.___._~~-L...~~-'-'-~-'-'-~~~~~ 0.0 '-L-L--'-'--L--'-'--L--'-'-~-'-'-~-'-'-~-'-'-~-'-'-~ 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Temperature (QC) Temperature (QC)

Figure 5. Dielectric constant of the 50 cS silicone oil vs. tempera­ Figure 7. Square of the dielectric mismatch parameter, /3 =(KP ture. - Krl/(KP+2Krl, vs. temperature.

12 ,------, 0.225

0.200 E = 0 kV/mm Phosphoric acid 2.5 M 10 Urea 4 M 0.175 pc =20 vol% en 1 "' - Shear rate = 100 s 8 e:,Ctl 0.150 "E >, Ctl cii "vi- 0.125 C 0 0 6 (.) • (.) en 0.100 (.) "> ·;:;: C (.) -Q) -Q) 4 ,._ 0.075 Q) a.Ctl 0 a. 0.050 Phosphoric acid 2.5 M <( 2 Urea 4 M q>" = 20 vol% 0.025

0 L.....--'--'----'-~L.....-'-...... -'--''----'--'-'----'--'-'----'--'- ...... 0.000 '-,..L-L...-'-'-~-'-'--L--'-'--L--'-'--L-~~-'-'-~-'-'-~ 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 0 1 0 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Temperature (QC) Temperature (QC)

Figure 6. Dielectric constant of phosphoric ester cellulose ER Figure 8. Apparent viscosity behavior of phosphoric ester cellu­ fluids plotted against temperature. lose ER fluids plotted against temperature.

(9) (7) From Figures 5, 6, and equation 4, variation of /3 2 at where a is the radius of dispersed particle and E the elevated temperature can be calculated and the results electric field. Therefore the point dipole force (Fd) be­ are shown in Figure 7. /J 2 increased until temperature tween two particles is as follows, up to 80°C. But, as temperature passed over 80°C, it re­ mained nearly constant. From Figure 7, it is possible to (8) guess that shear stress of anhydrous ER suspensions de­ veloped in this study has the highest point at 80°C at Where f3 is the dielectric constant mismatch parameter constant shear rate and electric field. of ER suspensions which is shown as {(Kp - Kr)/(Kp + Rheological Measurement at Elevated Temperature. 2Kr)l. Viscosity ( 17 0) without electric field has large influence From equation 8, the point dipole force (Fd) between on the electrorheological effect of anhydrous ER suspen­ two particles under constant E, a and Kr can be shown as sions of phosphoric ester cellulose particles and was follows, measured at temperatures up to 80°C as seen Figure 8.

Polym. J., Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000 479 B.-G. AHN, U.-S. CHOI, and O.-K. KwoN

5000 behavior was measured up to 80°C as seen in Figure 9. Shear rate 100 s· 1 Shear stress increased with temperature under constant 4500 shear rate and pc = 20 vol% electric field. But, as soon as ER suspen­ 4000 Phosphoric acid 2.5 M sion temperature is over 80°C, increasing shear stress Urea 4 M with temperature is abruptly stopped. These results can 3500 be explained from Figure 7. Till 80 t, shear stress of ER 2 co suspension was increased due to increasing value of {3 • e:, 3000 /;,;:Imm Slowdown of shear stress was observed over 80°C tem­ (/) (/) perature because the increase in f3 2 a> 2500 disappears. This be­ +-'... havior can be deduced (/) from eq 7 . 1 2000 Under constant shear ), ...co rate (100 s- electrorheologi­ a> cal effect ( rA/ro) of anhydrous ER suspensions of phos­ .c 1500 (/) phoric ester cellulose particles was measured at differ­ • -~//1~ k~/mm 1000 ent temperatures as seen in Figure 10. Electrorheologi­ cal effects increased with power law on increasing tem­ 500 perature. This proves that ER fluid developed in this study is anhydrous ER suspension which show good 0 ~_._~_,_...... __,_..___,__,_...... __,_..___,__,_.L.J._,_..___,__.._, ER 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 activity at over 80°C. Temperature (°C) CONCLUSIONS Figure 9. Shear stress us. temperature for E=l kV mm- 1 and 2 1 kVmm- . Phosphoric ester cellulose particles dispersed into sili­ cone oil were stable below 200 t, proving that ER sus­ pensions are anhydrous ER suspensions. Current den­ 10000 ~------r------, sity Ur oc rm, m = 24.2-26.4) and conductivity ( CY[ oc rn, log ER effect = (10.45] log r/ n = 23.9) of phosphoric ester cellulose ER suspension in­ 2.0kV/mm ; creased with increasing temperature, and had a power law dependence on temperature under constant concen­ 1 tration. The square of dielectric constant mismatch pa­ 2 rameter (/3 ) at elevated temperatures was closely re­ 1000 I; lated to shear stress of ER suspensions. The electrorheo­ Ii1 logical effect of phosphoric ester cellulose ER suspen­ sions increased with power law on increasing tempera­ Jog1 ER effect = [11.42] log l ture, proving that ER suspension developed in this study ;.0 kV/mm f was an anhydrous ER suspension which can be used at 100 wide temperature range.

REFERENCES ~pc= 20 vol% 1 Shear rate 100 s 1. W. M. Winslow, J. ofPhysics, 20, 1137 (1949). 2. T. B. Jones, Proceedings of Second International Conference 10 '-----~--~-~-~~~--'-~ on ER fiuid, 14 (1990). 100 1000 3. Yu. F. Deinega and G. V. Vinogradov, Rheo. Acta, 23, 636 Log temperature, T (°K) (1984). 4. C. J. Gow and C. F. Zukoski, J. Colloid and Interface Sci., Figure 10. Electrorheological effect of phosphoric ester cellulose 136,175 (1990). ER fluids plotted against temperature. 5. H. Block and J.P. Kelly, U.S. Patent 4687589, 1987. 6. I. K. Yang and A. D. Shine, J. Rhea/., 36, 1079 (1992). 7. B. G. Ahn, U. S. Choi, and 0. K. Kwon, Polym. J., 31, 494 (1999). Viscosity of developed ER suspensions was noted to be 8. H. Conrad, A. F. Sprecher, Y. Choi, and Y. Chen, J. , that of Newtonian fluids under without DC fields. From 35, 1393 (1991). the results of Figure 8, the apparent viscosity (r7o) meas­ 9. C. Wu and H. Conrad, J. Phys. D: Appl., 29, 3147 (1996). ured without electric fields decreased with temperature. 10. J. Brandrup and E. H. Immergut, "Polymer Handbook", Jone 1 Wiley & Sons, Inc., 3rd ed, New York, N.Y., 1989, p V/122. When strain rate (100 s- ) and electric field (1 1 1 11. D. J. Klingenberg and C. F. Zukoski, Langmuir, 6, 15 (1990). kV mm- and 2 kV mm- ) were constant, shear stress

480 Polym. J., Vol. 32, No. 6, 2000