DOCSLIB.ORG

Bakerville to Loveland Trail

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bakerville to Loveland Trail l Guanella St ch a Creek l i Reservoir u Empire n Cl ear G le er y 1 utl R 3 2 B a ) d ( ) 6 k e re e l r 0 r C d t r T e R v u 3 l B Douglas Mountain li i le ( S h Rd a c h Ball Mountain d l c u h l d G n lc G u R o u i h a 9550 r C G 12529 o O s y eek d r e r T e n ods C Lincoln Mountain a i rk Wo r M u va unny T ) l S Skies 6 A k mbine 3 Bard Creek Rd (252) T olu R 10363 e r C d (1 Urad il e l Turkey Gulch r Gu d Reservoir Bard a C R Silver Heritage Area Trails g m Silver Heritage Area Trails r t (upper) Engelmann Peak Creek T re Hassell Lake So e k Lake ek u R e t e h d re 13362 r il C C n Tra i S 2) r r (25 eek e d Cr lv p R r i k a p e e reek r re l S Trail C ing C C G d S ar u B l 15 c h R d ( 1 3 ) Clear Creek County, CO 0 0 Clear Creek County, CO ) 3 (1 d Bard Creek R Sprin lch Georgetown g Gulch u Robeson Peak G Sou n g th S pri 13140 l State r d T Pettingell Peak e R ) t tin 6 a It is the responsibility of the trail user to r o 14 L ma 2 a Wo G ods C 1 13553 reek Wildlife ( R uby C 2A d reek . 78 Alps Mountain R know some basic rules of etiquette: 7 7 in a Area t 1 n Herman Lake 10560 u t 2 s Mo S lp Georgetown 13 A e . n Lake i 1 t Saxon Mountain GRAND W Bard Peak n ) e a 6 White 1 Ute Creek Mount Machebeuf g 11546 (12 r d . 1. Please stay on the trail t 13641 Reservoir R Co A Herman Gulch in n r Democrat Mountain a 0 nt t 12805 Sherman Mountain A u in o lps o e You Are 1 M n u 11481 2. Please RESPECT private property COUNTY Herman Gulchta Trail 12287 7 s B U l Mount Parnassus 2 te C ree G Here . k R 2 D 13574 2 d i k v u ree and do not trespass off the trail. Georgetown 1 (11 8) C Republican Mountain 7 go id wn Chica l t a e c Silver Plume Mountain S h 3 12386 lly B 1C e o . Tr B 0 n M 12477 ro w i 1 a n 7 t 3. Please prepare for weather T G 4 8 u lc n Cascade Creek r h Hagar Mountain il e Mount Bethel g Ca a s r c ad 13195 i A e l - k 4. Please pack in-pack out-leave no trace 12705 C ee Rd r # 5 Brown Mountain (1 6 9 C 1 T l ) 5 h o o u Sixth St 3 Bar C m d d G p 11602 s r l o u e i n l e c 5. Rise above those that came before you a G k r h Dry T u Gulc l B k h c r h o l F a r i u o b r r Rose St Devils Canyon a a h b B c l and please leave the trail cleaner than you u r 12 9 o G s Griffith Mountain ou T tr a W u h c 11568 r l found it. u G n Pavilion Pt d o rt ke r Creek F in Clea r P Bakerville o o Mount Trelease to L f rk o r T vel y Rd Water St a lle h n Va lc e 12477 1 r u d G e h r T ilv an 7 r S m a d a a t e Georgetown i i D l u reek W Reservoir goC l ) ica est ) R st Ch Bak 02 1 We erville (3 8 - Rd 3 ( 1 d k ) e R 4 e 1 94 r Silver Plume 1 C s ( e R l ree k d y s C .2 a o a g u a P c 2 Q Leavenworth Mountain hi a Alpine Peak l C l st e e 11098 2) n 11552 W 5 a 11 3 ( u rth C G nwo reek Rd Pendleton Mountain ave Le enwo Leav rth Creek reek 12275 S Independence Mountain Clear C Mount Sniktau o ) 1 u 9 t . h 1 8 B C 3 l e ( 13234 4 1 a 11452 S . r C d t 2 e 8 r R e v C e o e 4 k lo h - . n Green Lake c l 2 s u G y G e l - u z Warrior Mountain Loveland l d c z i d k r h e a re G C Rd r a 8 o (32 g 11273 1 7 Lake Edith ica ) o h G C th Ski Area u R o S 1 0 St 3 eve d ns G Clear Lake ulch n a 3) 1 o 1 0 3 o 1 Ethel Creek r g ( h ulc Ganley Mountain l Kearney G i a d .1 Little Sugarloaf Peak R 4 a h 9 12902 W lc R u l r 11349 G 7 n e a Baker Mountain a m r v fer t i Hef . o R l n R o 12448 F e C e C k Cabin Creek a Reservoir e n (lower) n 3 Echo Lake il - i Devils Nose Tra 4 S E 6 Kelso Mountain t Paines Mountain ain - 5 t c n n u n 11057 1 13164 12048 - Beaverdam Creek o e h M l Bakerville to Loveland Trail (BLT) w i g o 16 o Captai r a n t r Lak T l A e e rai T 2 Grizzly Gulch g Continental Divide Trail e r Cabin Creek l o Reservoir o e (upper) H 6 G Sugarloaf Peak 3 s Herman Gulch Trail # 98 l 12513 l e H Idaho 4 Grays Peak National Springs Watrous Gulch Trail # 95 Grizzly Peak Reservoir Recreation Trail 54 13427 Torreys Peak 14267 2 5 Bard Creek Trail # 83 Waldorf Legend Goliath Peak 12216 6 Mount Evans County Boundaries Non-MotorizedVance Creek Trails Grays Peak National Recreation Trail # 54 SUMMIT COUNTY Edwards, Mount Wilderness Grays Peak 13850 ) M 2 1 t 2 . 7 14274 8 7 E 3 5 Argentine Central Railroad Grade Municipal Boundaries v Motorized Trails ( 5 k - a e n re - d s l l C i i T r o a R ag a ic 8 h r C s s t T s e s 8 s W Otter Mountain a Georgetown-Snake River Wagon Road e P Mount Evans Wilderness Freeway/Motorwayw k R a 12766 k e l e d o l r C a o e g ( a 5 c d n i L h ) 9 C a a e 7:30 Mine Trail u o M G Clear Creek Countyg Lands Highway se a u ic T o 10 Argentine Pass h D h Silver Dollar Lake Trail # 79 C Chicago t Lake C s (lower) Lincoln Lake Gray Wolf Mountain e - Mount Wilcox Municipal (City or Town) Lands Ramp/Slip Road R l 11 i 13408 13602 Rogers Peak Silver Dale Area a Chicago 13391 r Lake 12 T Argentine Peak Private/Other(upper) Lands Major Arterial Roads t s Rutherford Trail 13738 s e s r o a F P l A e a k Naylor Lake t ree n r C 13 s e o om i e tt G r n o State Lands Minor Arterial Roads Saxon Mountain Road t r c g S Murray Lake a i o en 9 N F Mount Warren t 7 t l - l a e n S l v i o i e i 13307 14 l s t S a o u o a Bennhoff Lake Trail r th v T C o N er Do e le U.S. Forest Service Lands Collector Road 0 0.5 1 2 Miles a R l ll r k r a La C / re e Summit Lake e o Silver k h b a a Dollar ap s Mount Spalding Ar I 15 Lake n Silver Creek Trail Sa 13842 10 e/ Pik S 16 0 0.5 1 2 3 Kilometers Decatur Mountain Square Seeu USFS Motor Vehicle Beartrack Creek Sm Top Lakes m McClellan Mtn Spur e l Shelf Lake t Bear Creek e Square Top Mountain (lower) 12890 r Square G m ulc Top Lakes h 2 13794 (upper) Mapit forke MotorizedF Trail 8 Trails l ts - k a a ree L ng C Tumbli Mount Evans 14264.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) § 294.49
    § 294.49 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–13 Edition) subpart shall prohibit a responsible of- Line Includes ficial from further restricting activi- Colorado roadless area name upper tier No. acres ties allowed within Colorado Roadless Areas. This subpart does not compel 22 North St. Vrain ............................................ X the amendment or revision of any land 23 Rawah Adjacent Areas ............................... X 24 Square Top Mountain ................................. X management plan. 25 Troublesome ............................................... X (d) The prohibitions and restrictions 26 Vasquez Adjacent Area .............................. X established in this subpart are not sub- 27 White Pine Mountain. ject to reconsideration, revision, or re- 28 Williams Fork.............................................. X scission in subsequent project decisions Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, Gunnison National Forest or land management plan amendments 29 Agate Creek. or revisions undertaken pursuant to 36 30 American Flag Mountain. CFR part 219. 31 Baldy. (e) Nothing in this subpart waives 32 Battlements. any applicable requirements regarding 33 Beaver ........................................................ X 34 Beckwiths. site specific environmental analysis, 35 Calamity Basin. public involvement, consultation with 36 Cannibal Plateau. Tribes and other agencies, or compli- 37 Canyon Creek-Antero. 38 Canyon Creek. ance with applicable laws. 39 Carson ........................................................ X (f) If any provision in this subpart
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC)
    Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Summits on the Air USA - Colorado (WØC) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S46.1 Issue number 3.2 Date of issue 15-June-2021 Participation start date 01-May-2010 Authorised Date: 15-June-2021 obo SOTA Management Team Association Manager Matt Schnizer KØMOS Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Page 1 of 11 Document S46.1 V3.2 Summits on the Air – ARM for USA - Colorado (WØC) Change Control Date Version Details 01-May-10 1.0 First formal issue of this document 01-Aug-11 2.0 Updated Version including all qualified CO Peaks, North Dakota, and South Dakota Peaks 01-Dec-11 2.1 Corrections to document for consistency between sections. 31-Mar-14 2.2 Convert WØ to WØC for Colorado only Association. Remove South Dakota and North Dakota Regions. Minor grammatical changes. Clarification of SOTA Rule 3.7.3 “Final Access”. Matt Schnizer K0MOS becomes the new W0C Association Manager. 04/30/16 2.3 Updated Disclaimer Updated 2.0 Program Derivation: Changed prominence from 500 ft to 150m (492 ft) Updated 3.0 General information: Added valid FCC license Corrected conversion factor (ft to m) and recalculated all summits 1-Apr-2017 3.0 Acquired new Summit List from ListsofJohn.com: 64 new summits (37 for P500 ft to P150 m change and 27 new) and 3 deletes due to prom corrections.
    [Show full text]
  • ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS in COLORADO, Proposed Rule
    ROADLESS AREA CONSERVATION: NATIONAL FOREST SYSTEM LANDS IN COLORADO, Proposed Rule Regulatory Impact Analysis And Cost-Benefit Analysis USDA Forest Service July 16, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................4 BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................25 PURPOSE AND NEED.............................................................................................................................................26 PROPOSED RULE AND ALTERNATIVES .........................................................................................................28 ROADLESS AREA BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................................................................28 ALTERNATIVES........................................................................................................................................................31 IMPLICATIONS OF RELATED PLANNING EFFORTS AND FEDERAL DIRECTION (DONE) ..............38 METHODOLOGY, DATA, AND ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................41 SCOPE OF ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................41 Benefits and Costs..............................................................................................................................................42
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Roadless Areas
    MAP 3 MAP 3 Colorado Roadless Areas CRA acres 135 Kreutzer-Princeton 43,300 255 Blackhawk Mountain 17,500 Rounded 232 Colorado Roadless Area Names 136 Little Fountain Creek 7,700 256 East Animas 16,900 233 to nearest Platte River 100 acres 137 Lost Creek East 14,900 257 Fish Creek 13,500 Wilderness Arapaho-Roosevelt National Forest 4 138 Lost Creek South 5,900 258 Florida River 5,700 246 236 1 Bard Creek 22,800 139 Lost Creek West 14,400 259 Graham Park 17,800 23 2 Byers Peak 10,200 ** Map Key ** 140 Methodist Mountain 6,900 260 HD Mountains 25,000 248 232 3 Cache La Poudre Adjacent Area 3,000 226 243 Mount 141 Mount Antero 38,700 261 Hermosa 148,100 234 4 Cherokee Park 7,600 Major Roads Zirkel 21 5 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas 44,200 142 Mount Elbert 22,100 262 Lizard Head Adjacent 5,800 Wilderness 23 249 244 6 Copper Mountain 13,200 143 Mount Evans 15,400 263 Piedra Area Adjacent 40,800 247 236 Rawah 25 76 10 7 Crosier Mountain 7,300 144 Mount Massive 1,400 Wilderness 264 Runlett Park 5,600 9 8 Gold Run 6,600 Colorado Roadless Areas 11 145 Pikes Peak East 13,700 265 Ryman 8,700 235 5 3 9 Green Ridge -East 26,600 146 Pikes Peak West 13,900 266 San Miguel 64,100 C3ache La Poudre 10 Green Ridge -West 13,700 5 3 Wilderness 147 Porphyry Peak 3,900 253 5 11 Grey Rock 12,100 267 South San Juan Adjacent 34,900 National Forest System Wilderness & 5 Comanche Peak 27 148 Puma Hills 8,800 268 Storm Peak 57,600 239 23 Wilderness 12 Hell Canyon 5,800 230 5 13 Indian Peaks Adjacent Areas 28,600 149 Purgatoire 16,800 269 Treasure Mountain 22,500 Other
    [Show full text]
  • BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN for Data Analysis Unit RBS-3
    BIGHORN SHEEP MANAGEMENT PLAN DATA ANALYSIS UNIT RBS-3 Georgetown Herd GAME MANAGEMENT UNIT S32 Prepared for: Colorado Division of Wildlife By: Sherri Huwer Terrestrial Wildlife Biologist Northeast Region Date: March 2010 Photo: Brett Crimmel i RBS-3 Bighorn Sheep Management Plan______________________ DAU RBS-3 (Georgetown Bighorn Sheep) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GMUs: S32 Land Ownership: 46% Private, 36% USFS, 11% City/County, 5 % State, 2% DOW, 1% BLM Posthunt Population: Previous Objective 250-350 2008 Estimate 370 Current Objective 250 - 350 Posthunt Sex Ratio: Previous Objective 60-80 2008 Observed 88 2008 Modeled 89 Current Object. 60-80 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Population Estimate Population 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Objective Estimate Figure 1: RBS-3 bighorn posthunt population estimate and objective range from 1991 to 2008. 120 100 80 60 40 20 Rams : 100 Ewes100 : Rams 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Modeled Observed Objective Range Figure 2: Observed, modeled and objective range of posthunt sex ratios for RBS-3 from 1991 to 2008. 40 30 20 10 Number Removed Number 0 1982 1985 1988 1991 1994 1997 2000 2003 2006 2009 Rams Ewes Figure 3: RBS-3 ram and ewe removals via harvest and translocation from bioyear 1982 to 2008. i RBS-3 Bighorn Sheep Management Plan______________________ Background Information The Georgetown Bighorn Sheep herd (Rocky Mountain Bighorn Sheep Data Analysis Unit 1 - DAU RBS-3) is one of the largest herds in Colorado. It is also one of the most highly valued for the opportunities it provides for hunting, wildlife viewing, and photography and as a source of bighorns for reintroductions and herd supplementations throughout Colorado and other states.
    [Show full text]
  • A Newsletter for Friends of the CAIC Spring 2003 ¨ Volume 7, Number 3
    A Newsletter for Friends of the CAIC Spring 2003 ¨ Volume 7, Number 3 for our CAIC crew. Some of the “If one wants to avalanche activity reached historic avoid avalanche proportions, and it was truly a wonder to have seen this. Unfortunately, these danger, one should types of events can come at a great cost to the people, the economy, and winter stay in bed, and activities in Colorado. In this last issue of The Beacon for the make sure the 2002–03 season, Knox Williams exam- ines the amazing storm that struck the house is not in an Front Range on March 17–20 with such intensity that people will be talking avalanche path.” about it for years, if not decades. by Scott Toepfer We also have an article from —Andre Roch Jonathan Thompson, the editor of the Silverton Standard & the Miner, one of Colorado’s oldest s you pick up this issue we are heading newspapers. Silverton has a long history of snow and down the road to spring or summer avalanche research. Jonathan's article profiles Chris depending on your elevation. As usual our Landry, who now continues Silverton's tradition in ava- winter was full of excitement, dry spells, lanche research at the Center for Snow and Avalanche A big storms, smiles and tragedy. Early Studies. season forecasts had called for a winter with near- Our last piece is by Brad Sawtell, the lead at the new normal temperatures and precipitation. The jury is still Summit County Avalanche Office. deliberating the final verdict with the given evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds
    Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds EUGENE H. SCHMITZ • Reprinted from THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST Vol. 61(4424-446. 1959 University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Ind. Seasonal Biotic Events in Two Colorado Alpine Tundra Ponds' EUGENE H. SCHMITZ University of Colorado, Boulder The rugged terrain and the rigorous climatic conditions of the alpine tundra present a rather formidable picture to the field biologist. The long winter, deep snow, blizzards, and high winds make the alpine tundra relatively inaccessible for biological studies with ordinary equipment during much of the year. Even in the short summer, high winds, frequent cold showers, and summer blizzards are likely to occur at any time. It has long been generally recognized that such severe climatic conditions are remarkably restrictive upon the aquatic as well as the terrestrial biota of the tundra. With the exception of Neldner and Pennak (1955), who conducted a full open season study on a single Colorado alpine pond, the Amer- ican literature on tundra ponds is almost non-existent, being limited to brief descriptions, single visits, and casual observations. European investigators, such as Brink and Wingstrand (1949), Pesta (1933, 1935, 1943, 1948), Pichler (1939a, 1939b) , Stirnimann (1926), Thomasson (1951, 1952), and Turnowsky (1946), have produced a much more extensive array of literature, but like the majority of Amer- ican papers, these are brief descriptions and not full seasonal studies. It is the purpose of the present paper to give a limnological description of two small Colorado alpine tundra ponds, based upon observations and data gathered at relatively frequent intervals during the entire open season.
    [Show full text]
  • C Lear Creek GIS C Ounty
    Creek G ilpin C o unty D D D 12147 D Jefferson County G ty Gilpin County rand Coun ICE LAKE D OHMAN LAKE STEUART LAKE D D REYNOLDS LAKE D D 13391 LAKE CAROLINELOCH LOMAND ST MARYS GLACIER Fox Mountain ST MARYS DLAKE FALL RIVER SILVER LAKE D D LAKE QUIVIRA 11239 13130 FALL RIVER RESERVOIR SLATER LAKE D SILVER CREEK SHERWIN LAKECHINNS LAKE Witter Peak D D 12884 D D James Peak Wilderness MEXICAN GULCH D ETHEL LAKEBYRON LAKE D D BILL MOORE LAKE HAMLIN GULCH D D 13132 CUMBERLAND GULCH D MILL CREEK D D Russell Peak Breckinridge Peak Berthoud Pass D D 12889 G D D ilp D in D C D ou n ty D Grand C D D ounty D MAD CREEK LION CREEK D Stanley Mountain YORK GULCH D D FALL RIVER 12521 BLUE CREEK Cone Mountain D D HOOP CREEK 12244 SPRING GULCH Red Elephant Hill D 10316 D ¤£US 40 D CLEAR CREEK This map is visual representation only, do not use Bellevue Mountain URAD RESERVOIR (LOWER) for legal purposes. Map is not survey accurate and ¨¦§I 70 D WEST FORK CLEAR CREEK 9863 Seaton Mountain may not comply with National Mapping Accuracy Red Mountain D D GUANELLA RESERVOIR 9105 12315 EMPIRE n County Standards. Map is based on best available data as Gilpi RUBY CREEK Ball Mountain Douglas Mountain of October, 2018 . BUTLER GULCH CENTRAL CITY D D VIRGINIA CANYON Lincoln Mountain GEORGIA GULCH 12529 9550 OHIO GULCH WOODS CREEK D GILSON GULCH Engelmann Peak 10363 TURKEY GULCH D IDAHO HASSELL LAKEURAD RESERVOIR (UPPER) 13362 BARD CREEK LAKE SILVER CREEK TRAIL CREEK J e US 6 f f ¤£ e r s o BARD CREEK SPRINGS n Flirtation Peak C Robeson Peak Columbia Mountain o ty
    [Show full text]
  • Fsm91 058053.Pdf
    PURPOSE The purposes of ths appendix are to 1) complement information contamed on the evaluation described in Chapter Three, Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences, Roadless Areas, 2) provide a summary of the evaluahon for each roadless area (RA), and 3) provide information on the Roadless Area Review and Evaluahon of 1979 (RARE n) INTRODUCTION Chapter Three provides 1 a legal framework for the RA analysis and evaluation, 2. a descripaon of the process, 3 a table of the RAs analyzed, 4 a table of the evaluation of each RA, and 5. the environmental consequences of the management area allocahons by alternative, based on the Need Assessment analysis. This appendix provides 1 a table of the RAs analyzed for reference, 2 the guidelines used by the Ranger Districts to evaluate roadless areas and determinahons for recommendations for designation, 3 the guidelines used for the detaled analysis and narrative for each RA, 4 the narrative for the James Peak RA, as an example, 5 summary tables of the detaled narratives for each RA, 6 the management area allocations by altemahve for all RAs, and 7 a summary of the RAs considered in the RARE 11 analysis. The detaded narrauves for the individual RAs are part of the Admnistrative Record. ROADLESS AREAS ANALYZED The Revision evaluates 330,230 acres in 38 Roadless Areas (RA), 34 percent of the non- wilderness Forest, for possible recommendations to Congress for designation, as shown below Appendax C I Inventory and Evaluation of Roadless Areas Table C.l Roadless Areas Evaluated in the Revision.
    [Show full text]
  • We've Got This
    ENGLEWOOD SUMMER 2020 | CITY MAGAZINE & RECREATION GUIDE CITIZEN WE’VE GOT THIS. Community and Business Response to COVID-19 Englewoodco.gov/recovery Due to COVID-19, events or programs may be canceled or postponed and may require social distancing practices. 1 12 44 11 14 24 36 Contents Recreation General Facility Information Aquatics / Water Fitness Adult Athletics 4 Mayor’s Message 8 “Flow it Forward,” Englewood 15 City News 22 32 44 Hear from Mayor Linda Olson 10 Englewood’s Proactive 23 Englewood Recreation Center 34 Swimming Lessons 45 Adult Fitness 5 Council’s Corner Response to COVID-19 Community Highlights Mayor Pro Tem Sierra and 16 Council Member Russell 24 Malley Recreation Center 36 Pirates Cove 48 Active Adult Fitness 11 Local Business Spotlight Grow + Gather 6 Planning for Englewood’s Future 18 Get Involved 26 Englewood Library 38 Cultural, Enrichment & 50 Yoga & Tai Chi City Council’s Strategic Plan Education Programs Creating a Sense of Place 12 Englewood Public Library Central Business District Turns 100 29 Computer / Tech Classes 52 Pilates Improvements Since 1920, the library has never 19 Parks at a Glance 41 Youth Athletics lost sight of its mission Facility Listing for City Parks 30 Broken Tee Golf Course 54 Excursions / Extended Travel 7 Community Connections 42 Active Kids Keeping Residents Connected Get Out and Explore 14 Fun for Everyone 20 Your Guide to City parks Mark your calendar for 31 Outdoor / Hiking 57 Special Events summer events 2 3 LINDA OLSON OTHONIEL SIERRA RITA RUSSELL MAYOR OF MAYOR PRO TEM COUNCIL MEMBER, MEETCOUNCIL'S YOUR NEIGHBORS CORNER ENGLEWOOD DISTRICT 1 AT LARGE This issue of the Englewood Citizen magazine contains The suddenness of the COVID-19 These past couple of months important City information and responses to assist pandemic has impacted every have been a very harrowing businesses and residents in this very difficult time with household, every business, and time for us.
    [Show full text]
  • 470 Part 294—Special Areas
    § 293.17 36 CFR Ch. II (7–1–20 Edition) (iii) The portage from Back Bay to under appropriate conditions deter- Pipestone Bay of Basswood Lake. mined by the Chief, Forest Service. (iv) The portages from Fall Lake to (b) Grazing of domestic livestock, de- Newton Lake to Pipestone Bay of Bass- velopment of water storage projects wood Lake. which do not involve road construc- (v) The portage from Vermilion Lake tion, and improvements necessary for to Trout Lake. the protection of the National Forests (2) The Forest Service may authorize, may be permitted, subject to such re- by special use permit, the use of motor strictions as the Chief, Forest Service, vehicles to transport watercraft over deems desirable. Within Primitive the following portages: Areas, when the use is for other than (i) Four Mile Portage From Fall administrative needs of the Forest Lake to Hoist Bay of Basswood Lake. Service, use by other Federal agencies (ii) Vermilion Lake to Trout Lake. when authorized by the Chief, and in (iii) Prairie Portage from Sucker emergencies, the landing of aircraft Lake to Basswood Lake and the use of motorboats are prohib- (iv) Loon River to Loon Lake and ited on National Forest land or water from Loon Lake to Lac La Croix. unless such use by aircraft or motor- (c) Snowmobile use. (1) A snowmobile boats has already become well estab- is defined as a self-propelled, motorized lished, the use of motor vehicles is pro- vehicle not exceeding forty inches in hibited, and the use of other motorized width designed to operate on ice and equipment is prohibited except as au- snow, having a ski or skiis in contact thorized by the Chief.
    [Show full text]